Physics 34.1 Bernoulli's Equation & Flow in Pipes (8 of 38) Calculating the Frictional Head Loss

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 เม.ย. 2019
  • Visit ilectureonline.com for more math and science lectures!
    In this video I will calculate the frictional head loss of a cast iron pipe, L=100m, v=2m/s, D=2”=50.8mm, of water of temp=20C.
    To donate:
    www.ilectureonline.com/donate
    www.patreon.com/user?u=3236071
    Next video in this series can be seen at:
    • Physics 34.1 Bernoull...

ความคิดเห็น • 37

  • @ziky3329
    @ziky3329 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Now I understand why Western education system are so advanced and practical 👍

  • @frankebass
    @frankebass ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Great playlist, this is really well explained and helpful! Thanks for the great work

  • @bizanbourhim9745
    @bizanbourhim9745 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you Mr. Michel, Great lesson.

  • @kronnox256
    @kronnox256 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What if we are given the friction instead, how would you find the relative roughness or at least the roughness of a pipe using experimental data only?

  • @mro2038
    @mro2038 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great lecture!
    At 2:52 I think we should look for 0.003 instead of 0.03 on chart, if I'm not wrong.

    • @touseef_akhtar
      @touseef_akhtar 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      He did look for 0.003 on the map. :) Just a slip of tongue

  • @yvonnevianney5880
    @yvonnevianney5880 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you, I'm learning a lot more than my lecturer taught

  • @JasonP-pe4yz
    @JasonP-pe4yz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    thank you. simple and straight forward

  • @jace_Henderson
    @jace_Henderson 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why does my book and teach say RPR is D/e I noticed that a lot of formulas we’re using on my class are kinda swapped, like that, idk why. Our flow graph relative roughness numbers are the polar opposite, they’re tens of thousands as opposed to 10’s of thousandths.

  • @egmelaku
    @egmelaku 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear, Michel van Biezen.
    It was a wonderful tutorial. Appreciated it, Thank you!
    But, How about pipes connected end to end? or a network of supply lines going to the house tap, say, a shower?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, what we typically cover is the theoretical pipe flow without viscosity and affect of bending and connections. That requires a whole new set of videos covering those topics. We plan on covering that, we just haven't been able to get to it.

  • @ssksha690
    @ssksha690 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What is the unit of kinematic viscosity in this equation?

  • @finlaycharleson4263
    @finlaycharleson4263 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I know this is not really relevant to the video exactly but does the viscosity of a fluid depend on its temperature if so what formulae are there to describe this, also does the flow rate change therefore depending on temperature?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes, they are both dependent on temperature

  • @HappyDrawing24
    @HappyDrawing24 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks sir

  • @wizardhunts8078
    @wizardhunts8078 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great explanation! I was following all the way through. I just need to know what "effective length" is. Apparently it has the something to do with the addition of head loss in pipe and head loss due to fittings (k factor)? Any help would be greatly appreciated!

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The effective length is the length of a pipe that would account for the same pressure drop or head loss as the pipe in question without any bends, fittings, etc.

  • @JohnFekoloid
    @JohnFekoloid ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for this.

  • @user-bg3xk1tq1c
    @user-bg3xk1tq1c 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    where can use the formula 4flv^2/2gD and flv^2 / 2gD is there any difference? please give some example between 4flv^2 /2gD and flv^2 / 2gD . when I can use that formula?

  • @BryantJ31
    @BryantJ31 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @Michel van Biezen how are you doing?
    I was wondering if I can ask you a question, regarding head loss math problem I have. I can't seem to figure it out. Can I email you ?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We try to answer questions here on the comments when time permits. We have our regular jobs, so our time is very limited with the many requests.

    • @BryantJ31
      @BryantJ31 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@MichelvanBiezen Ok I understand, I appreciate your time. Thank you.

  • @kennethjamero4075
    @kennethjamero4075 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    where can use the formula 4fLv²/2gD and flv²/2gd is there any difference? thank you sir!😊

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The Darcy Weisbach equation for frictional head loss is: flv^2 / 2gd.

  • @mostafaabboud5184
    @mostafaabboud5184 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you

  • @user-ep6dz5fj2l
    @user-ep6dz5fj2l 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    What is rpr?

  • @yasitharajesh3233
    @yasitharajesh3233 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thanks sir 😍😍

  • @menailsajid7786
    @menailsajid7786 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't get same fanning friction factor value😭

  • @Er.GaneshKhadkaofficial
    @Er.GaneshKhadkaofficial 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Good explain man 😂