Nabokov in Montreux: 1965 Interview

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 190

  • @grigoryborodavkin1730
    @grigoryborodavkin1730 ปีที่แล้ว +82

    His humor was delightful. He was delightful. But you knew that too.

    • @shrayerm
      @shrayerm  ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You're welcome. Thank you for subscribing.

  • @larrycarr4562
    @larrycarr4562 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    Nice to see the man behind the writings… an intimate delight.

  • @iridule
    @iridule ปีที่แล้ว +127

    Really can't appreciate this enough, Dr. Shrayer. So few interviews of Nabokov appear online so it's such a treat to see this extended interview. Thanky, thanky, thanky!

    • @shrayerm
      @shrayerm  ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Thanks so much

    • @shrayerm
      @shrayerm  ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thank so much you for subscribing

  • @vicomtedevalmont1073
    @vicomtedevalmont1073 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    This is definitely the most 'intimate' capturing of Nabokov on camera... It's nice to get a glimpse into his daily life + mannerisms LOL. Thanks for sharing this + doing the scholarly work you do on Nabokov as well. Very enlightening.

    • @shrayerm
      @shrayerm  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for subscribing.

    • @dajoker8998
      @dajoker8998 ปีที่แล้ว

      Pedo

  • @johngtrotman
    @johngtrotman 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Such a treat to find this. Thank you!

  • @MarieMarie-sv8ok
    @MarieMarie-sv8ok 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Vladeemer .. Nabokov que je n'ai jamais cessé d'aimer depuis ma première lecture : "Lolita" en 1970. Je relis encore ses livres, jamais rassasiée ni fatiguée de le lire. Nabokov est unique au monde.

  • @edgarpontes8247
    @edgarpontes8247 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    As Mr Nabokov concerning his interviews, no words come to me as I try to express my gratitude for this video. It's a rare experience to watch this great writer speaking for himself.

  • @abaridos
    @abaridos 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Драгоценное интервью, бесценный дар от тех, кто его подготовил, сохранил и опубликовал. Живое общение с этим редким человеком открывает многое в его творчестве, а именно - его отношение к читателю, к издателям, к юмору, к композиции, к разным странам, к переменам в жизни, к постоянным переменам в жизни при сохранении ее главного стержня, скрытого от людей с более низкой организацией... Цельность и целеустремленность этой личности поражает и освещает дорогу над нелегким настоящим куда-то еще в будущее с надеждой.

  • @anaklasis
    @anaklasis ปีที่แล้ว +24

    FINALLY, after so many years and I was starting to doubt did I really watch this film...again in TH-cam! Sir, you have my deepest gratitude. Hats off!

    • @shrayerm
      @shrayerm  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      My pleasure. Thank you for subscribing.

  • @claudiamanta1943
    @claudiamanta1943 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Delightful on so many levels. Thank you for sharing. 😊

  • @dennisbento7440
    @dennisbento7440 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    This was outstanding. Thank You Maxim for finding it.

    • @shrayerm
      @shrayerm  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you for subscribing

  • @trevorbailey1486
    @trevorbailey1486 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Thank you very much for posting this rewarding interview. I had the pleasure of staying in the Hotel Fairmont Le Montreux Palace in 2014. I sought it out in homage to this remarkable man. The foyer is (thankfully) unchanged. The helpful staff took me on a tour of the whole floor across which the Nabokovs lived, serving them then as an apartment. (And I can imagine what the writer, who prized peace of mind so highly, would have had to say about being woken at 2am by the nearby nightclub.)

    • @shrayerm
      @shrayerm  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for subscribing

  • @beatrixvantil8623
    @beatrixvantil8623 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    thank you for sharing , brilliant and kind Nabokov💟 , I can't agree more with his thoughts on Freud

  • @tryharder75
    @tryharder75 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    His control of my language is the closest to music i have ever read such beauty

  • @ivankaedinger3631
    @ivankaedinger3631 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great video, thank you. His wife was so beautiful. I still keep letter she sent me in 1988. Such a nice woman she was.

    • @shrayerm
      @shrayerm  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you so much.

  • @erwinwoodedge4885
    @erwinwoodedge4885 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    So glad to hear him mention Salinger and Updike!

  • @immaterialimmaterial5195
    @immaterialimmaterial5195 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    What a wonderful portrait of this great man. His writing is exquisite. What an incredible life.

  • @sreehari_nair_rediff
    @sreehari_nair_rediff ปีที่แล้ว +68

    This is one of those very rare video interviews, perhaps the only one (Dmitri Nabokov alludes to this one in a documentary), that VN had given without the aid of carefully prepared notes. And if you are astute about it, you can see that the characteristic Nabokovian Pride was essentially a lightness of spirit, a love of life, transfigured by matchless verbal dexterity.

  • @StephenDedalus74
    @StephenDedalus74 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Wooooooooooooooooow !!!! At last !!!! I have been looking for years for this interview !!! This is the perfect birthday present so thank you so much !!!!! :)

  • @MrUndersolo
    @MrUndersolo ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I am so glad this is up! Never knew he was on film at this time...

  • @annasper
    @annasper ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks so much Maxim for posting this wonderful interview. So many unexpected surprises. VN sweet and vulnerable? Who would have thought ? He hides nothing. Just look at his pleasure with his cards and that Florentine pencil . Or calling his Lolita editions pretty. VN actually using the word ´pretty´? Not to forget his child like happiness in the chess game with his wife. It was especially good to hear him describe his writing process as never smooth sailing. Anna

  • @alexander_p9
    @alexander_p9 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I enjoyed it so much ❤️ Thx

  • @mrvujinovicm
    @mrvujinovicm ปีที่แล้ว +4

    What a pleasure to see the old master talk about his work and his process, to see him acting so casual. Thank you very much for this video!

    • @shrayerm
      @shrayerm  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for subscribing

  • @thomasbell7033
    @thomasbell7033 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Thank you so very much for posting this. I didn't even know it existed before the algorithm translated my passion for Martin Amis'work into a similar one for VN. Upon Amis' death I went bingeing on interviews he gave. Apparently, many of us did this.

    • @shrayerm
      @shrayerm  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Many thanks for subscribing.

    • @jonharrison9222
      @jonharrison9222 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Amis’s introduction to the Everyman edition of Lolita is definitive. I think he reprinted it in The War Against Cliche.

  • @B_Estes_Undegöetz
    @B_Estes_Undegöetz ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thanks very much for posting this!

    • @shrayerm
      @shrayerm  ปีที่แล้ว

      My pleasure. Happy you subscribed.

  • @dmitriy2853
    @dmitriy2853 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Важно было услышать голос Владимира Набокова и видеть ,чтобы почувствовать его как человека. Спасибо! Его точная эмоционально поэзия для мыслящих людей неповторима, человеческая редкость. Ей мало уделяется внимания, вывод конечно неутешительный.

  • @dedalus1289
    @dedalus1289 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    thanks for posting this. Such a treat.

  • @stratovation1474
    @stratovation1474 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    What a gem! Like Von Neumann, little on film of brilliant and difficult lives. Insight into life and creativity.

    • @shrayerm
      @shrayerm  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for subscribing

  • @haileyuki5129
    @haileyuki5129 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    very enjoyable, thanks for posting!

    • @shrayerm
      @shrayerm  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you for subscribing.

  • @josebenito15
    @josebenito15 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Great Video. Thanks so much for uploading this. Not many interviews with Nabokov, not many documentaries either. One of the greatest writers in English language.. And English wasn't his mother tongue language 📖

    • @shrayerm
      @shrayerm  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you for subscribing

    • @josebenito15
      @josebenito15 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@shrayerm You welcome and Greetings from Spain

    • @AlikaLi357
      @AlikaLi357 ปีที่แล้ว

      English was more native to him than Russian. He spoke Russian tongue-tied and with an accent since childhood. His aristocratic family spoke English and French, and he only began learning Russian as a teenager. He often formed Russian words by adding Russian suffixes to English roots. In this video you can hear that, speaking Russian, he cannot pronounce the Russian sound “r” correctly. And his own translation of “Lolita” into Russian is funny and terrible. He brought out the obsolete Russian language from emigration. For example, he translated “jeans” as “blue cowboy pants,” although in Russia “jeans” are called jeans.

    • @DuncanMcLouder
      @DuncanMcLouder 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You are fundamentally wrong. Nabokov spoke Russian very well, and he said that he had no native language, but thought more often in Russian. Now to " the jeans", the first jeans appeared in the USSR at the end of the 50s, in the mid-60s they became popular. He translated the book in 1967, he translated this phrase very accurately, and the key word here for the soviet reader is “cowboy”. Я по-манере письма вижу, что вы русскоязычная, поэтому продолжу на этом языке, дабы вам было более понятно. Вы описываете его со "своей колокольни", так получилось, что моя жизнь с 6 лет сплошные переезды, в итоге 3 языка, на которых я спокойно из'ясняюсь, но не стоит путать разговорную речь и лит. письменную - это раз. Во-вторых, ну не перевод это в вашем обыденном понимании, Не Перевод, человек написавший худ. произ. его не переводит, а пишет как бы заново, на другом доступном ему языке с оглядкой на оригинал.

  • @orvitusmagnus54
    @orvitusmagnus54 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This interview was very pleasant, especially in these troubled times! Very interesting a true citizen of the world! RIP Vladimir 🙏🙏🙏🙏 Where was I then in 1965, oh yes, in elementary school! I find it a very moving and profound interview!

    • @shrayerm
      @shrayerm  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for subscribing

  • @fiorellafenati5395
    @fiorellafenati5395 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    undoubtedly the greatest writer of the 20th century, Lolita, a book so complex that it would take at least 3 readings.
    A great wonderful writer.

    • @varvarvarvarvarvar
      @varvarvarvarvarvar ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It would take you a lifetime to figure how it relates and expands on Pnin.

  • @НикитаРезвов-у4п
    @НикитаРезвов-у4п ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you, Dr. Shrayer, for the opportunity and pleasure not only to read this interview but also to watch it.
    If you have in possession the video of interview to Mossman and can upload it as well, that would be very kind of you.

    • @csaracho2009
      @csaracho2009 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/UbtvWnvbXTE/w-d-xo.html

  • @ghostmantagshome-er6pb
    @ghostmantagshome-er6pb หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Reading the Annotated Lolita it occurred to me this 'foreigner' had a far better grip on my native language and country than I did.
    I would completely trust his french translations to English.
    Amazing intellect.

  • @ivanpenkov2612
    @ivanpenkov2612 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you Dr. Shrayer, for giving us the chance to enjoy Nabokov's presence at our homes!!

  • @hanawana
    @hanawana ปีที่แล้ว +4

    what a gem
    thank you!

  • @anthonychase4364
    @anthonychase4364 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What a delight. Thanks for posting.

  • @alexastep
    @alexastep ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Truly thankful for sharing such wonderful interview with us! 🧡

    • @shrayerm
      @shrayerm  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for subscribing

  • @astrorho
    @astrorho 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What a wonderful interview, thank you so much for sharing this!

  • @taniahinkesambar1096
    @taniahinkesambar1096 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ой, ой, оййй! Набоков! Как хорошо! Мне и в голову не приходило, что я смогу увидеть и услышать своего любимого писателя. Спасибо!

  • @nuccicaggiati5625
    @nuccicaggiati5625 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Simply extraordinary! Thank you

  • @ИринаКрыжановская-ы2з
    @ИринаКрыжановская-ы2з 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like that interview so very much ! Thank you !
    ❤❤❤😮😮😊😊

  • @claudiamanta1943
    @claudiamanta1943 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The beginning is absolutely epic. EPIC. 😄

  • @qamarm1831
    @qamarm1831 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Well , it's so nice to watch this live interview, much delighted . I have great appreciation for his writing, he made romantic tragedy an epic by the notions he held. Thank you very much for showing it .

    • @shrayerm
      @shrayerm  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for subscribing

  • @lucasventer
    @lucasventer ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you very much.

  • @vangelisanna
    @vangelisanna 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thank you for uploading this!

  • @dasglasperlenspiel10
    @dasglasperlenspiel10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Oh thank you, thank you, thank you!

  • @jesuisravi
    @jesuisravi ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I remember watching interviews of this sort back in the 60's on WTTW channel 11 in Chicago. I was a kid with a nose for this kind of thing.

  • @iLuvSirin
    @iLuvSirin ปีที่แล้ว +4

    i love him so much 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

  • @annemcleod8505
    @annemcleod8505 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Such a treat, thank you!

  • @bbailey17b
    @bbailey17b ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'd understood/read that he insisted on having questions submitted in advance, so as to prepare his answers and read out responses.
    So this surprises me.

  • @kebabtvrtkic4299
    @kebabtvrtkic4299 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Уважаемый Максим Давидович - спасибо за замечательное видео (а так же, за вашу книгу "Бунин-Набоков")

    • @shrayerm
      @shrayerm  ปีที่แล้ว

      Большое спасибо. С наступающим Новым годом.

  • @troygaspard6732
    @troygaspard6732 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is wonderful and very intimate.

  • @nickboldewskul2136
    @nickboldewskul2136 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nabokov is more relaxed here without index cards than he was with Trilling on the program "Close Up" discussing Lolita with index cards. There's also a dearth of televised interviews with his younger cousin, Nicolas Nabokov; a composer, cultural ambassador, and friend of Stravinsky.

  • @hanawana
    @hanawana ปีที่แล้ว +2

    enjoyed every second

  • @countfurioso7589
    @countfurioso7589 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Beautiful find.

  • @tarnopol
    @tarnopol ปีที่แล้ว

    Huge upload!

  • @appidydafoo
    @appidydafoo ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you

  • @TheAj253
    @TheAj253 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I love that he detests humility. A truly sardonic soul with a unique zest for life.

    • @stuartwray6175
      @stuartwray6175 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      very Nietzschean

    • @shrayerm
      @shrayerm  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for subscribing

  • @jamesnicol3831
    @jamesnicol3831 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    fascinating in subject and presentation

    • @shrayerm
      @shrayerm  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for subscribing

  • @timelanguid4813
    @timelanguid4813 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Read once Nabokov said he had never been drunk. He was drinking wine here which obviously does not mean he was lying. He must know when to call it a night. Nice to see him playing football. I read he played football as a goalkeeper in England. Interesting man in many ways.

  • @recoveringscot3587
    @recoveringscot3587 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    "...like a hypnotised person making love to a chair." Wonderful.

  • @Alcander_arts
    @Alcander_arts 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nabokov played soccer is so wholesome

  • @robkeeleycomposer
    @robkeeleycomposer ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love this man.

  • @User-bl5cw
    @User-bl5cw ปีที่แล้ว +4

    (21:30) Imagine being the kid who got to play football with Vladimir Nabokov

  • @JAK-c9q
    @JAK-c9q 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A beautiful man. I loved the chess game with Vera.

  • @johndelreyb.jansinal8104
    @johndelreyb.jansinal8104 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    He's delighted

  • @tarjeik7162
    @tarjeik7162 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    A real LEGEND🤩💪🙏🏻😇

  • @mortalclown3812
    @mortalclown3812 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I had no idea he learned English first: I always thought his books were even more brilliant in light of the fact that he was Russian. He's still a total genius...😂
    The world is richer for his life. Amazing upload.
    Rest in paradise, V.

    • @shrayerm
      @shrayerm  ปีที่แล้ว

      SO glad you enjoyed, and thank you for subscribing.

    • @К.А-э2я
      @К.А-э2я ปีที่แล้ว +8

      This, of course, is an exaggeration, or rather mythology, the first was Russian, then English, then French😊

    • @AlikaLi357
      @AlikaLi357 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not quite so, in his aristocratic family they spoke English and French, but he knew Russian poorly and began to study only as a teenager, spoke with an accent, confusing Russian and English words.

  • @DerAleksan
    @DerAleksan ปีที่แล้ว +9

    05:08 Набоков читает по русски!

  • @pine-solitude
    @pine-solitude 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    When Nabokov wrote Lolita nobody really knew anything about him except he was a college professor. He was invited (plus one) to a swanky NY party full of writers and journalists, who fully expected him to arrive with a teenager on his arm. But there was this old White haired lady. To make matters more astonishing, Vladimir and Vera were clearly in love. One man there looked at her and was shocked by a realization: “SHE was Lolita!”
    I read that story somewhere once.
    They are buried in what amounts to the same Grave. There’s no line demarcating their bodies from one another under the slab of marble. This is True Love. ❤️

  • @jonharrison9222
    @jonharrison9222 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Seems to have been humbler and more genial than his writing suggests.

  • @ecce_homo7991
    @ecce_homo7991 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    even after decades of living in the west he didn't develop an accent when he spoke russian

    • @shrayerm
      @shrayerm  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for subscribing.

  • @larrycarr4562
    @larrycarr4562 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    “Cheated creation, by creating something yourself …”

  • @seanmccarthy8879
    @seanmccarthy8879 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    he talk about working on a novel about time...in which a seemingly scholarly essay on time morphs into the story. does anyone know if that was ever completed?

    • @FranzBubendorf
      @FranzBubendorf ปีที่แล้ว +2

      In a sense, yes. I believe 'The Texture of Time' is the name of the lecture Van Veen gives in the fourth chapter of Ada or Ardor.

    • @seanmccarthy8879
      @seanmccarthy8879 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@FranzBubendorf thanks, haven't read that one in years...I'll have to give it another read

    • @gautamchoudhury7622
      @gautamchoudhury7622 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ada or ardour?

    • @stuartwray6175
      @stuartwray6175 ปีที่แล้ว

      He 'talked'; 'talks' about ...

    • @seanmccarthy8879
      @seanmccarthy8879 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@stuartwray6175 do you really spend your time correcting typos on youtube comments? smh

  • @tryharder75
    @tryharder75 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    anyone got some obvious examples of N's use of "Chess Problems" in the plot/structure of his novels?

  • @adampowell5376
    @adampowell5376 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    If we did not already have Lolita I do not think that it could be published today.

  • @blairribeca5858
    @blairribeca5858 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Two commercial interruptions before 6 minutes pass.Does that seem excessive to you?

  • @rogerkeizerstein6147
    @rogerkeizerstein6147 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Funny guy!

  • @Anicius_
    @Anicius_ ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How in the f could google know i started reading Nabokov today? I havent searched for anything related to Nabokov here and i am getting recommendations both here and google homepage. Its kind of creepy. Last week youtube suggested me a video on laura melvey' visual pleasure and narrative cinema after i purchased a book which had that article in it. Wtf?

  • @lohkoon
    @lohkoon ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There was a writer named V Nabokov
    Who wrote a tale about a little girl;
    A sex book - that's what you are thinking of!
    And into great fame did its writer hurl.
    The book enriched him; he lived like a prince:
    He'd talked about nothing else ever since.

    • @shrayerm
      @shrayerm  ปีที่แล้ว

      Genius

    • @ldragon8er
      @ldragon8er 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I suspect he wrote mainly about himself. The hard work of editing and typing seems to have been done by Vera, who has work experience in her family's publishing company.

    • @Whatdoesntpass
      @Whatdoesntpass 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @lohkoon
      There was once a writer named Nabokov,
      Who wrote a sex book you're probably thinking of!
      Though fortune and fame the book gave him,
      He'd never stop talking about the damn thing.
      Yours is better, it only needs to further flow,
      It was f*ing with me so I gave it a go.

  • @gurbbyy6252
    @gurbbyy6252 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    wow

  • @jasonlynn1017
    @jasonlynn1017 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Nabokov's attack on Freud instantiates the very Philistinism he condemned in one of his better writings of lthat title; worse, that a genius like Nabokov had to "take second jobs" and "eek out a living proves that Philistinery has in fact won the Kulturkampf. But Freud was as far from Medieval as Voltaire, dear master novelist, and your "dreams" are up for penalty, but if you grant hypnosis, mental cause, and the Unconscious exist, which you just did when savaging Mann, well gee you are a Freudian.

    • @claudiamanta1943
      @claudiamanta1943 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You sound like Jordan Peterson (it’s up to you to take it as a compliment or not 😄).
      Freud was not Medieval, he was a cave man. With an umbrella. The question is not whether he and Jung were right (oh, the terrible reality that we live in a world which reveres quantum physics as much as psychoanalysis as divinely true, hence normative! 😄), but what they have been chosen to be ‘right’ for, over other (I should say more constructive) paradigms.

    • @jasonlynn1017
      @jasonlynn1017 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@claudiamanta1943 Magical thinking is not a more constructive paradigm, it's a regression to semi- infancy. Rhetoric like "constructive" begs the question as well, as what is being constructed is the laughable politics of ego fellation parading as science. Compliment? River Jordan? Ha. I have original theories, several, Monseigneur Peterson has not even one, not one I've heard but cannot listen to common sense values posing as truth: truth has no moral, no innate valuations. Peety, like most pop intellectuals neither understands nor can coherently explain Freud's theory. Neither can Richard Dawkins, but that's the consequence of pretending all biological causation happens at the micro level: fallacy deluxe, and a phallic narcissist territories- dispute. Siggy was not a caveman. My God. He and Sophocles discovered the greatest truth about human nature and 99% of humanity is not adult enough to know so. I suggest you read Freud from the late 1930s, and his heirs Otto Fenichel, Jeanne Lampl De Groot. Read the texts and drop the dogma. Nearly all that is said about Freud is dead wrong. Jung is not even a scientist or proper philosopher after 1914, and by his theory of THE SHADOW he had lapsed into a dissociative psychosis defined by Aggression Mania and Megalomania, his theory of The Shadow ( with apologies to Orson Welles) is literally the personification of his own mental illness, and its conversion into a "theory" which as it lacks even falsifiability, qualifies Jung as a foremost kook-mystic of the era, as was W. Reich after 1936 with the zany Orgone, the erotic cosmic energy (Fourrier and Empedocles beat him to that beat off). Too bad. Reich's was a vast and great mind and his diagnosis of Character Armor from retentive neurosis was a great discovery still not fully understood in this age of the philistine and fame-fuckery-fakery. But the early Reich of Character Analysis far surpassed in sheer genius anything by Jung. Reich from 1925-33 was one of the greatest discovers of human nature to live. Just ask Darwin. But I did take the time to reply to you given your obvious and deep intellect. But I really shouldn't blow it social media which is not very social and vile as media. Ciao, In Venerea Veritas. At least I made art of of my ideas as shown on my TH-cam channel but I need to go back to writing prose and real books

    • @jasonlynn1017
      @jasonlynn1017 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@claudiamanta1943 More simply: the difference between me and Jordan Peterson is between Diogenes and Ann Landers

    • @dajoker8998
      @dajoker8998 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Freud more like Fraud

    • @jasonlynn1017
      @jasonlynn1017 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dajoker8998 Oh boy, pun as proof. Yeah, humans are full of rational consciousness, free will and self made egos, especially for cheap as hominem from illiterates who cannot even correctly recite Freud's theories, or Darwin's for that matter. Go back to Gloria Steinem, or, The Bible and Fox news. Those are The American Choice.

  • @keithm257
    @keithm257 ปีที่แล้ว

    who was between kafka and proust? couldn't understand..!

    • @Valgant
      @Valgant ปีที่แล้ว +2

      "Петербург" Андрея Белого
      Petersburg by Andrey Belyi, a great russian writer

    • @keithm257
      @keithm257 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Valgant thank you… will see if I can’t find him in translation

    • @rosstheboss-q2f
      @rosstheboss-q2f ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Make sure you get the 1980s translation published by Penguin. It's first-rate. There was an earlier US version translated by two academics in the 70s which was rubbish, as well as leaving out great chunks of the novel. The Penguin version comes with indispensable notes at the back which explain a lot of the wordplay lost in translation. Hope you enjoy it - it really is a great novel.

    • @keithm257
      @keithm257 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@rosstheboss-q2f thanks… was pretty hard to find and unsure which edition I got but looked like 80’s cover art and is penguin so will find out soon when it arrives

  • @hajirizayev7374
    @hajirizayev7374 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    O.f.i.g.e.t.🤦🏻‍♂️ I could never imagine I would see Nabokov speaking English.

  • @villain7140
    @villain7140 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "How [Mann, Pasternak, Faulkner books] can be considered masterpieces... is to be the sort of absurd delusion as when a hypnotized person makes love to a chair" ...not much you can say after that

    • @NGS712
      @NGS712 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      As someone who loves Faulker's writing, very much, that made me bristle slightly. However, when he described them as "corncobby chronicles," I couldn't help but admire such a well-minted phrase. 😆

  • @liammcooper
    @liammcooper ปีที่แล้ว +3

    calling updike an artist and faulkner 'corn-cobby' is peak nabokov

    • @shrayerm
      @shrayerm  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for subscribing

  • @sergeylebedev8888
    @sergeylebedev8888 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very interesting English: neither British, no American. Первый раз услышал его английский))

  • @Diagnoc
    @Diagnoc ปีที่แล้ว +2

    His French is good.

  • @dhoraray1310
    @dhoraray1310 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Окey. But there's a touch of his mother tongue. Russian feels.

  • @hanawana
    @hanawana ปีที่แล้ว +1

    22:59

  • @justinleemiller
    @justinleemiller 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Can Russian speakers say something about his accent? Did people really use that accent?

    • @yeti2237
      @yeti2237 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yea his Russian surprises me he pronounces every syllable perfectly like an old british man speakinf English I’ve never heard anyone these days speak like that.

  • @No-0ne-is-Alone
    @No-0ne-is-Alone ปีที่แล้ว

    Didn't know he disliked Freud.

  • @fashion010101
    @fashion010101 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    English version of Lolita is much better. I've read it in both Russian and English.

  • @vitiachao9765
    @vitiachao9765 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    7:45 ¡Qué snob más insoportable! Mira que llamar estúpida (asinine) "La muerte en Venecia" de Thomas Mann. Pura envidia porque, a diferencia de Mann, a él no le dieron el Premio Nobel.
    La misma envidia él sentía de los Premios Nobel de Iván Bunin, Faulkner y Pasternak.

  • @tbwatch88
    @tbwatch88 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    and good old Vlad, my favourite writer save Tolstoy, claimed he was never ever drunk. hahaha. and that he detested music. but not film, mates. not film.

    • @shrayerm
      @shrayerm  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for subscribing

  • @0pieamii
    @0pieamii ปีที่แล้ว +4

    So glad he understood Freud was crazy, Jung not far behind.

  • @speakrussian6779
    @speakrussian6779 ปีที่แล้ว

    He was a snob but at the end of his life he accomplished what he wanted to have: to live in a palace and to be served. 😀

  • @SciMoTeAr
    @SciMoTeAr ปีที่แล้ว

    Who is he?

  • @nledaig
    @nledaig ปีที่แล้ว

    Of course he wouldn't like the word or concept: humility