the software and most of its source *it's been confirmed there's proprietary bits* are provided for free, sure... but the actual ownership rights over the project and...ugh... "IP" is google/alphabet...
I don't think so. Google start in 2022 to offer poor results to bother people and to make them only consult the add because the search results were useless making billions of loss in productivity. I think it made people pissed and when people are pissed politician do something.
Ironically the reason they pay firefox is not to seem like a monopoly, and like there are other browsers out there. 80% of money the Mozilla foundation gets is from that deal with google. 80% of income!
They pay Firefox that 80% to keep Google as their default search engine on their browser. They are not doing some favour to keep Firefox afloat. They do the same thing with apple and safari and pay 10s of billions to them. For Firefox it was about 400 or so million iirc
@level1865 I never said they do it as a favour. But I do believe that keeping firefox afloat is a bigger drive of the deal. Without firefox chrome is the only browser on the block. Firefox gives them an illusion of fair competition.
Honestly, is there really anything that bad about paying for something you offer to be the default so long as the consumer can near effortlessly change it at no cost? How has this really harmed consumers?
@@level1865 That seems like how Microsoft was investing in Apple to not seem like a monopoly. Google is just Microsoft reincarnated. Embrace, Extend, Extinguish.
To heck with Mozilla, I feel sorry for *me* as an Iceweasel user-the Mozilla Foundation is doing a whole bunch of stupid moves that have nothing to do with the Google bribe.
Well, on the up-side they may gain browser market share again because of Manifest V3. My friends who refused to use Firefox are flocking to it now because their adblockers are already not working on some sites.
It would be hilarious if Matt Gaetz enters the office and begins shaming any corporation for trying to bribe him, or offer insider trading. The fallout would be hysterical.
I remember hearing this quote and I quote "You can't stand them but you can't live without them". Chrome with google=bad; Chrome without google=Get the hell out. Can you even fking imagine what these so-called big tech will do with chrome. Just imagine when you open chrome and you get hit with "From Meta" or "From Amazon". It will be pure chaos and have far-reaching implications that we can't even rn.
Edge is perfectly fine nowadays. It's already there, it's Chromium, it can sync with an MS account (if desired), it can use plugins from the Chrome store, and all the MS specific additions are easily ignored. And best of alp: it's not from Google. Yes, I somewhat soured on them over the last decade.
Alphabet’s stewardship of Chrome has denied users session token encryption in main memory, true 144hz web page scroll refreshing and other logical features- all to stay compatible with the lowest common denominator so they can collect maximum telemetry and push the most ads.
@@tjmarx and by legacy hardware you mean hardware that's perfectly functional for their needs but companies want them to throw it away to buy new $hit.
@@tjmarx You can find a lot of retailers selling some pretty minimal, efficiency-focused hardware brand new. I doubt an N100 processor could handle these features. Which isn't a defense of Google at all either, it just calls for a configuration toggle - which calls the entire set of logic into question, that's all tbh not even what I'm here for. What I'm saying to you is that "low computing power" doesn't necessarily mean "legacy".
You're part of the problem. Companies need money. Advertising has been a way to get money without making you pay for stuff. Would you pay for every single website that runs ads?
@@MostachoIrregular I really really wonder how Companies ran their presences before google... Also most is just clickbait, ragebait, propaganda, can´t wait to see it go the way of the dodo.
@@MostachoIrregular It really doesn't cost much to run basic HTML static webpages or with a little JS, and ultimately that's basically what I'm looking for from the internet for the most part, so yea maybe I would consider a monthly bill calculated based on sites visited and requests made to each.
@@MostachoIrregular this logic is very very flawed fellow youtube user. Ads are always a problem when they distract from website content or consume too much bandwidth. In this case the anger is aimed at Google, not at the ads - google is misusing chrome to force manifest v3 for extensions. this is the real problem, if you can't see this, well, I keep enjoying firefox :)
I think it would be worrisome if they have to sell Chrome, cause there will be no nonprofit or any other organisation that could actually buy it. So it would fall under one of they other monopolies, like Microsoft. And say what you will, in my mind, Google plays better with this!
@@catfood1788 And Google would get paid nothing for their development? Lol, I am pretty sure that would violate the confiscation clause. So in order for company to become its own company, they would need to: 1) Have lots of investors invest billions of dollars in the future of a new company with no record. 2) Chrome would need to get a lot of debt (like billions) to pay off Google. 3) A combination of #1 and #2. #1 I think is almost completely unworkable, who will be investing the billions of dollars and just wait to see if Chrome succeeds on its own or not? Either way, as its company and without a huge company like Apple and Microsoft to fund them, they would face immense pressure to generate revenue, and how is a browser supposed to generate revenue? Create their own search engine? Add ads next to all websites? I think it would be doomed to fail
If Google had to sell Chrome, couldn't they just make a Brand New Web Browser based on Chromium, because it is fully Open Source? And call it anything but Chrome, like The "Google Browser"? 😮
They could be barred from entering the browser industry again, this is what they did the AT&T with when they lost an antitrust case in the 80s when they were banned from getting into computer products
@@catfood1788That's not what happened. AT&T relinquished control of Bell, which provided local telephone service, while AT&T continued to provide long-distance service. In 1984, Bell was further divided into seven regional companies. By 2005, six of these seven "Baby Bells" have merged to form two companies: AT&T and Verizon
not really. there wasn't also no more pain than today. If you wanted strict HTML and CSS: develop for the Presto Engine (opera), if you wanted the most reach: Mozilla/Netscape, if you wanted to torture yourself: Internet Explorer... I really don't miss those IEHacks.
When software is free, either you are the product or you are the developer. I'd much rather use software that is free because the community developed it than software that is free so it can sell my data.
If you split Chrome then forget about JS features at all. Right now they are spending years to agree with all the vendors and in such case it would be easier just to forget about updates at all.
Chromium is free because it’s open source. There are reasons to have open source software that don’t have to do with making money off users’ PII / ads. The problem is Chromium has had proprietary Google features that nobody wants included, just like Android.
Transcript 00:03 Quantum tunneling allows objects to pass through solid barriers. 00:20 Exploration of atomic behavior and its implications. 00:34 Understanding complex calculations with Gaussian methods and atom numbers. 00:58 Discussing the vastness of quantifiable data beyond human understanding. 01:09 Explains the vastness of Google's data scale through mathematical comparisons. 01:24 Exploring the concept of multiple Google universes. 01:38 Exploring Google's potential isolation from early universe events. 01:54 Quantum tunneling is unlikely to break apart Google.
My ex Boss was Chrome engineer, and that's why I will never use Chrome since then. Top of the line in browser but filled with dozen of spywares to steal everything they can from users. Actually, selling data is nothing new in freeware, but some chose to tell you, some didn't ... until the right time.
@@Quest3Games It is not really the "licensing terms" in legal terms, but more on how application is processed, or not. - Only process application of registered entity, eg. inc, corp, non-profit, etc. That basically shut the door for most hobby level project started by individual, or small team that have no plan of any government registration. - USD5K application fee if agree to process - Process is controlled by Google (owns Windvine)
I think they mean widevine, and that is insanity how it's swept under the rug. Trusted computing in general is a minefield of turning your computer against you in the name of "security".
@@BeefIngot Thx for the correction. Widevine is not about security, but for playing DRM content. It is difficult for anyway browser to get widespread adoption without it.
If we go with taking things off out of Google, than pls DOJ take off TH-cam out of their hands as well, if they are talking about overpowered monopoly.
I remember people were talking about vertically breaking up Microsoft back in the days, that means they would be two companies both with the browser, the OS, and so on.
Great, break em up. I’d much rather be slightly inconvenienced as a developer than sell my soul to big tech who are killing small businesses and turning the world into a subscribe-to-continue-living model. The other companies NEXT.
0:50 It's on November 20, 2024 or Jumada al-Awwal 18, 1446 AH and you're watching Fireship Videos about Google Chrome Bre4kup on the Code Report Series.
They deserve to lose it. They could have used Chrome to integrate Android into Windows, Linux and Mac but chose not to. They are now struggling to even implement nearby/quick share and are stuck with half-arsed windows phone link. They have a piece of software that is on literally every user's device, and they wasted it. A software that is always online and up-to-date.
Windows asked me 3 times if I was sure I wanted to switch to Chrome. A year later Edge stole all my chrome data and made a cloud backup before I even knew what was going on.
Doesn't Apple have monopoly over xcode, final cut pro These softwares are only available for Apple machines Why aren't they fined for not making it available across other OS?
Nobody wants to use that shit. Xcode is terrible. Even if they owned IntelliJ as a macOS exclusive, you'd still have VS Code as a competitor. And Final Cut Pro isn't a "must-have" either, it too has alternatives like Premiere Pro (great) or DaVinci Resolve (free).
So lemme get this straight: They filed a lawsuit because of the chrome market, but all the reasons for that they have are Google search engine related and not chrome??? It'll prolly not go through.
This isn't that weird. Using dominance in one market to monopolize another is actually pretty common subject of antimonopoly laws. Imagine a conglomerate both runs a railroad and produces steel. If they refused to carry other companies' steel on their railway (or charged them more), that would be totally illegal. Google is using their dominance over browsers to maintain dominance in search. They have a browser and only have their own search engine be the default, pushing out other search engines.
No the lawsuit is about Google having such large power in the browser world (their 66%), which they started to use to shape the internet in their favour with manifest V3. Where ads become harder to block, meaning their ad business can become more profitable. More views > More ad placement customers & people starting to pay for their ad free subscriptions (e.g. TH-cam premium) < which they btw recently increased 50% in price. They are the advertiser, ad placement (TH-cam & the Google search engine) & the vehicle (Chrome)
so far, (is incredible when u know this) but GOOGLE one of the top TECH companies in the WORLD has failed at every project they have launched 296 so far. except google search, adsense, maps, gmail,. android, and chrome. I really dont know how they keep that stupid CEO
Did you just say that Google failed at every project and then mention a list of 6 their products that alone make up most of company's revenue? Your comment is contradictory.
Google's main profit is ads and if they start to shape the internet in their favour (ad placement with manifest V3) with the amount of power they have in the browser competition, then yeah... They became the advertiser, the ad placement (TH-cam & Google) & the vehicle (Chrome)
If they start? Google literally already shaped internet as they saw fit. Every single website on Earth has to bow down to their rules. By now Internet is their plaything.
Adblocking still works well enough on v3, I don't really see how losing some ground on the security vs convenience debate is that big a deal. FF has always smashed Chrome in this area and forks use super fast native blocking engines baked right into their codebase.
That throws a wrench into Google's plans to dominate the whole online experience. If they can't dictate what Chrome does with ads, and benefit from it, then they're back to Square One.
I don't know if this is a stretch, but wouldn't Trump's disruption to the legal system affect this case and outright dismiss it. A case of conflict of interest?
Spin off Chrome as its own company and sell all shares on the open market, limiting the amount of shares any company, institution or person can hold to secure actual change. This is the only way it makes sense, otherwise the monopoly will just change hands, not stop being a monopoly. I hope this actually happens and TH-cam will be next, followed by all the other platforms and services with over 1 billion active users.
@@kugelblitz2001 If Google pays Apple $20 billion a year to be the default search engine on Safari, imagine how much they would have to pay Chrome to remain the default search engine on Chrome with more than triple the user market share compared to Safari.
somebody is really gonna pay $20 Billion for chrome when they could just download it for free lmao smh
the software and most of its source *it's been confirmed there's proprietary bits* are provided for free, sure... but the actual ownership rights over the project and...ugh... "IP" is google/alphabet...
Chrome is mine. The block chain shows that I paid 20 billion in Trump coin for it and therefore its my property.
bruh
😂
@@ETXAlienRobot201Can't some one just fork it ? why does it matter how owns the ip?🙄
Dont worry gentlemen I will buy chrome
Thanks, please add automatic ad blocking
ok lil bro
Thank you. Please add horse tinder plugin finally
what about gentlewomen
thank you kid sir
They discover in the 2024 that Google has a monopoly?
they stoped lookin away
but Apple forcing all browsers to use safari engine on iOS is not!
crazy world :)
Isn’t Apple also being sued for being a monopoly right now?
Because court cases only take seconds to build.
I don't think so. Google start in 2022 to offer poor results to bother people and to make them only consult the add because the search results were useless making billions of loss in productivity. I think it made people pissed and when people are pissed politician do something.
Ironically the reason they pay firefox is not to seem like a monopoly, and like there are other browsers out there.
80% of money the Mozilla foundation gets is from that deal with google. 80% of income!
They pay Firefox that 80% to keep Google as their default search engine on their browser. They are not doing some favour to keep Firefox afloat. They do the same thing with apple and safari and pay 10s of billions to them. For Firefox it was about 400 or so million iirc
@level1865 I never said they do it as a favour. But I do believe that keeping firefox afloat is a bigger drive of the deal. Without firefox chrome is the only browser on the block. Firefox gives them an illusion of fair competition.
@@anonanon6596 Firefox has less than 3% market share tho. Edge, safari, etc have way more of a presence than ff.
Honestly, is there really anything that bad about paying for something you offer to be the default so long as the consumer can near effortlessly change it at no cost? How has this really harmed consumers?
@@level1865 That seems like how Microsoft was investing in Apple to not seem like a monopoly. Google is just Microsoft reincarnated. Embrace, Extend, Extinguish.
Gemini telling users to die was not on my 2024 bingo card
get gud
It's not even the first time. Or was that "Searches cures for depression > Gets directions to the Golden Gate Bridge" screenshot debunked?
I wouldn't put it past Gemini to say something like that, but how hard is it to open Chrome dev tools, edit the HTML, and screenshot it?
Hehe😢
GPT when offered the trolley problem with anything Vs a sentient AI, it always saved the sentient AI over anything
I feel sorry for Mozilla. They're about to run out of that Google money.
To heck with Mozilla, I feel sorry for *me* as an Iceweasel user-the Mozilla Foundation is doing a whole bunch of stupid moves that have nothing to do with the Google bribe.
Well, on the up-side they may gain browser market share again because of Manifest V3. My friends who refused to use Firefox are flocking to it now because their adblockers are already not working on some sites.
yeah but at least they wont have to compete with a cheating monopoly any more
Maybe they'll finally get their arses up the couch and work on Firefox
@@AnukTheWolf Up the couch?
I'll buy chrome for $20.99. Google hit me up
Best I can do is $3.50 if this other buyer flakes out.
Superior FF is free
2.66$ from me
I'll buy it for £π.
I'll own it if they pay me at least 10M and the contract says I can just delete it.
It's a shot across the bow cause they didn't pay their "lobbying fees" this month
when you pick a side instead of lobbying both sides
Lol
It would be hilarious if Matt Gaetz enters the office and begins shaming any corporation for trying to bribe him, or offer insider trading. The fallout would be hysterical.
@@Not_interestEd- Please tell me you don't seriously think Matt Gaetz has a shred of integrity.
maybe, but at least theyre doing theyre job a LITTLE BIT
I worked at WETA Digital in the advent of LOTR, sat next to Guy Williams and delivered the texture map for the one ring, coincidentally.
Thats cool.
Thank you for your service to film 🫡
try googling LOTR the one ring r34
Big dick energy right there..
pretty awesome
I remember hearing this quote and I quote "You can't stand them but you can't live without them". Chrome with google=bad; Chrome without google=Get the hell out. Can you even fking imagine what these so-called big tech will do with chrome. Just imagine when you open chrome and you get hit with "From Meta" or "From Amazon". It will be pure chaos and have far-reaching implications that we can't even rn.
If Chrome goes, does that mean I can finally stop pretending Edge is a joke?
Given Edge is Chromium, isn't it just Chrome from Wish?
@@Kyrolysisat least it's not Safari
oh wait, on iOS everything is safari, so google going down won't change much there
nope it still is if firefox exists
no.
Edge is perfectly fine nowadays. It's already there, it's Chromium, it can sync with an MS account (if desired), it can use plugins from the Chrome store, and all the MS specific additions are easily ignored.
And best of alp: it's not from Google. Yes, I somewhat soured on them over the last decade.
Google just needs to pray that the judge ain't some 90 year old grandpa who thinks google search is a manual process done by employees.
Or a Tech Savvy judge who wants a working Ad Blocker.
Appeal it to the supreme court where they can be bribed to rule in favor of Google.
To be honest, extreme censorship is done manually. There is no more page rank in Google search
@@thecodemachine oh, we so need that ad blocker judge, doj pls make it happen
Are you from UK?
Android as a seperate company again? Can we make it happen?
I feel like if that happens, Google Play Services and everything related must come with it otherwise it will likely collapse in of itself
@@kuda1532"Droid Play *sexual C3PO noises*"
Mesah wanna play with ma droid.
@@kuda1532 android market?
@@kuda1532sure, but that said it'd be amazing if somebody made their app store connected to an APK provider instead. Imagine the literal freedom
So it can be dead?
All Google services are subsidized by ads.
This is basically an attempt at killing consumer choice and boosting garbage like Apple.
Time to add 5 years of Google Chrome exp to my resume
along with the regional technology manager for blockbuster and toys R us
May be time for you to stop making the same joke on every video.
It stopped being funny years ago...
It's always funny, keep going
@@lucassilvas1 add that to the resume
Please DoJ sell Chrome to The Linux Foundation it would be so funny and I will be a good citizen that pays his taxes on time.
Highly unlikely, but dang do i want it to happen
Honestly it would probably be the fairest thing in order to avoid giving any of the other major tech companies a major advantage. GPL that sucker.
Donate 20 billion to the Linux foundation so they can buy it
TLF is just microsoft now and linus is a clown
The Linux Foundation spends only 2% on development of Linux according to 2023 financial reports it published. Let that sink in.
Alphabet’s stewardship of Chrome has denied users session token encryption in main memory, true 144hz web page scroll refreshing and other logical features- all to stay compatible with the lowest common denominator so they can collect maximum telemetry and push the most ads.
Which is this lowest common denominator that can't have these features?
And by lowest common denominator you mean users with legacy hardware. That's what you really mean.
They have the biggest brains in the industry to make this squeeze as tight as possible
@@tjmarx and by legacy hardware you mean hardware that's perfectly functional for their needs but companies want them to throw it away to buy new $hit.
@@tjmarx You can find a lot of retailers selling some pretty minimal, efficiency-focused hardware brand new. I doubt an N100 processor could handle these features. Which isn't a defense of Google at all either, it just calls for a configuration toggle - which calls the entire set of logic into question, that's all tbh not even what I'm here for. What I'm saying to you is that "low computing power" doesn't necessarily mean "legacy".
Firefox + DDG + Ublock has been my go-to for years. Can't stand googles self imposed moral authority over EVERYTHING.
That's me too lol
There's way better than ddg, guant but with a qw instead of a G and U (because yes I trust google that much)
@@MiauFrito never heard of gwant, i dont even use search engines anyways, just use one of the two llms and you should be fine
that's America in a nutshell lol, but eh let's not bring politics to the table
Zen browsee
finally. install a browser that actually protects your data and is not actively fighting against ad blocks.
You're part of the problem. Companies need money. Advertising has been a way to get money without making you pay for stuff.
Would you pay for every single website that runs ads?
@@MostachoIrregular Corporate bootlicker pls go
@@MostachoIrregular I really really wonder how Companies ran their presences before google...
Also most is just clickbait, ragebait, propaganda, can´t wait to see it go the way of the dodo.
@@MostachoIrregular It really doesn't cost much to run basic HTML static webpages or with a little JS, and ultimately that's basically what I'm looking for from the internet for the most part, so yea maybe I would consider a monthly bill calculated based on sites visited and requests made to each.
@@MostachoIrregular this logic is very very flawed fellow youtube user. Ads are always a problem when they distract from website content or consume too much bandwidth. In this case the anger is aimed at Google, not at the ads - google is misusing chrome to force manifest v3 for extensions. this is the real problem, if you can't see this, well, I keep enjoying firefox :)
I think it would be worrisome if they have to sell Chrome, cause there will be no nonprofit or any other organisation that could actually buy it. So it would fall under one of they other monopolies, like Microsoft. And say what you will, in my mind, Google plays better with this!
chrome needs to join internet explorer
Sounds like Chrome is Elon's next purchase
Selling it isn’t the only option, it could be spun off as its own company competing with google.
From frying pan to lava smh
@@catfood1788 And Google would get paid nothing for their development? Lol, I am pretty sure that would violate the confiscation clause. So in order for company to become its own company, they would need to: 1) Have lots of investors invest billions of dollars in the future of a new company with no record. 2) Chrome would need to get a lot of debt (like billions) to pay off Google. 3) A combination of #1 and #2. #1 I think is almost completely unworkable, who will be investing the billions of dollars and just wait to see if Chrome succeeds on its own or not? Either way, as its company and without a huge company like Apple and Microsoft to fund them, they would face immense pressure to generate revenue, and how is a browser supposed to generate revenue? Create their own search engine? Add ads next to all websites? I think it would be doomed to fail
"get off easy" made me do a spit take
Everyone got off easy when she was around
@@jonasbaine3538 and she was doing the spit takes.
I heard she was spitting too
@@jonasbaine3538 Who is that?
If Google had to sell Chrome, couldn't they just make a Brand New Web Browser based on Chromium, because it is fully Open Source? And call it anything but Chrome, like The "Google Browser"? 😮
That's what I would do. I'd just change the name or fork it; just s/search/replace/g the word "chrome."
They could be barred from entering the browser industry again, this is what they did the AT&T with when they lost an antitrust case in the 80s when they were banned from getting into computer products
@@catfood1788That's not what happened. AT&T relinquished control of Bell, which provided local telephone service, while AT&T continued to provide long-distance service. In 1984, Bell was further divided into seven regional companies. By 2005, six of these seven "Baby Bells" have merged to form two companies: AT&T and Verizon
Judgment would say Alphabet can't enter the browser market for next 99 years or something to that effect lmao!
Now where will I find another browser that uses my microphone to eavesdrop, then "coincidentally" advertise what I need at the moment?😮💨
dont worry bro edge has got you covered in that regard. maybe it will go back to it's explorer roots while at it 😂💀
Nobody records your dumb voice. Your search history and uhm TH-cam retention rate history! gets more data about you than you'd expect.
You can just block that. Google sucks, but no need to claim retarded nonsense.
Oh please!!!
Edge, opera and wave browser have you covered buddy don’t worry
I was the weird one out when I started using Chrome and now it's getting lawsuits for being too popular
Funny that right after this video a TH-cam ads suggested me to “do everything with chrome”
uh- what?
2:50 holy cursed meme
I've seen that woman before, where was it?
Who's that
It is the female officer who slept with 6 of their coworker
Leaving a comment here so I can come back later and find out who that woman is
An escort who briefly pretended to be a cop.
1:34 you jest, but the roto wipe changed my life
For the better or...?
@@GenesisAkaG he used to be a mister now he is a misses
@@o1-previewis that an ai generated joke?
@@TheDoomer666 I think the user called "preview" is either a) transphobic b) an idiot or c) both
It reminds me of an angle grinder, no thanks
DOJ: We have plans to separate Chrome.
Android: Hello?
3:21 Imagine the horrors...
"one browser to rule them all
one browser to find them
one browser to bring them all
and in the darkness bind them"
Wow nice fireship quotemaster
It's painful to imagine the web dev world before the release of Chromium
not really. there wasn't also no more pain than today. If you wanted strict HTML and CSS: develop for the Presto Engine (opera), if you wanted the most reach: Mozilla/Netscape, if you wanted to torture yourself: Internet Explorer... I really don't miss those IEHacks.
The polymarket reference lol
3:46 activated my "Hey Google" feature lol
0:34 Google: Don’t be evil.
0:55 Also Google: holds *66.6%* of browser market share.
When software is free, either you are the product or you are the developer. I'd much rather use software that is free because the community developed it than software that is free so it can sell my data.
Nothing will change. You can set up a reminder in one year to watch this video again, Chrome and Google will still be there.
If you split Chrome then forget about JS features at all. Right now they are spending years to agree with all the vendors and in such case it would be easier just to forget about updates at all.
Meanwhile me being in 2.65% firefox user 😎
We are the 3% :D
We are the exception
Wolves in a world of sheep.
I'm a Bing Edge kind of freak
@@charlesabju907 ...So, chromium.
When you said 'Google search', it activated my Gemini assistant. Thanks for not saying anything after to get me in trouble.
so much for a "smart" assistant. its better to not have anything at all if you ask me.
I'd pay as much as I pay for internet to access a search engine that no site can be "optimized" for.
they're all optimized for google, so just stop using google
kagi?
I am using Felo Search now, much better than Google.
Hopefully no one ever flags ur plug at 3:33 on sponsorblock. That was truly a masterful plug
Was unfortunately flagged as self promotion as far as I can tell (yellow bar thingy) + the segment was really cleanly marked
3:51 Polymarket lmao
Chromium is free because it’s open source. There are reasons to have open source software that don’t have to do with making money off users’ PII / ads. The problem is Chromium has had proprietary Google features that nobody wants included, just like Android.
That poem in the end was immaculate
Transcript
00:03 Quantum tunneling allows objects to pass through solid barriers.
00:20 Exploration of atomic behavior and its implications.
00:34 Understanding complex calculations with Gaussian methods and atom numbers.
00:58 Discussing the vastness of quantifiable data beyond human understanding.
01:09 Explains the vastness of Google's data scale through mathematical comparisons.
01:24 Exploring the concept of multiple Google universes.
01:38 Exploring Google's potential isolation from early universe events.
01:54 Quantum tunneling is unlikely to break apart Google.
0:52 ermm, akchually, it should be rounded to 66.7% and not 66.6% 🤓🤓
L software developer
He could round down or round off.
It has to be evil.😈
My ex Boss was Chrome engineer, and that's why I will never use Chrome since then.
Top of the line in browser but filled with dozen of spywares to steal everything they can from users.
Actually, selling data is nothing new in freeware, but some chose to tell you, some didn't ... until the right time.
The issue actually is not chrome(and derivatives) dominance/monopoly. It is the widevine licensing policy.
What is Windvine licensing policy?
@@Quest3Games It is not really the "licensing terms" in legal terms, but more on how application is processed, or not.
- Only process application of registered entity, eg. inc, corp, non-profit, etc. That basically shut the door for most hobby level project started by individual, or small team that have no plan of any government registration.
- USD5K application fee if agree to process
- Process is controlled by Google (owns Windvine)
I think they mean widevine, and that is insanity how it's swept under the rug.
Trusted computing in general is a minefield of turning your computer against you in the name of "security".
@@BeefIngot Thx for the correction. Widevine is not about security, but for playing DRM content. It is difficult for anyway browser to get widespread adoption without it.
If we go with taking things off out of Google, than pls DOJ take off TH-cam out of their hands as well, if they are talking about overpowered monopoly.
Watching this on Brave right now without any ads.
Just like me
Same
Re *cough* van *cough* ced
Same same...
Watching on Ungoogled Chrome with Ublock Origin Lite
Using Edge as my main browser for 3 years now, as a developer, I have to say it is improved significantly
cool, but do you use ARCH btw?
yes, EndeavourOS but its still ARCH.
@@CathrineMacNiel ew, you guys are not on bsd
@@o1-preview will be, when arch breaks again.
Daily driving arch
I remember people were talking about vertically breaking up Microsoft back in the days, that means they would be two companies both with the browser, the OS, and so on.
Great, break em up. I’d much rather be slightly inconvenienced as a developer than sell my soul to big tech who are killing small businesses and turning the world into a subscribe-to-continue-living model. The other companies NEXT.
This video pace is perfect, thanks for slowing down a bit.
Just a bit? I think he slowed down a while byte for yo ah
0:50 It's on November 20, 2024 or Jumada al-Awwal 18, 1446 AH and you're watching Fireship Videos about Google Chrome Bre4kup on the Code Report Series.
Up
You can't hide the TYPO that was in the title from us!
"The plan to to break apart Google..."
what was the typo
@@ArmenAtwalto to
@@ArmenAtwal he wrote to twice
James Bissonette. You're up!
Kelly Moneymaker's out, sadly
@ Maybe she’s out because she’s been asked to buy Chrome?
Breaking apart large corporations is good for the economy and good for everyone except shareholders of that specific corporation.
They deserve to lose it. They could have used Chrome to integrate Android into Windows, Linux and Mac but chose not to. They are now struggling to even implement nearby/quick share and are stuck with half-arsed windows phone link. They have a piece of software that is on literally every user's device, and they wasted it. A software that is always online and up-to-date.
This makes me sad for the chrome developers who will have to change their twitter bio to "Ex-googler"
Their ex-twitter bio you mean
This is a terrifying graphic 2:52 😨... When the crash happens and the bubble bursts, I hope it won't affect me
Don't worry guys I'll buy winrar
RIP Firefox, gonna run out of money without google's help
And then I existed
Just as I started a LOTR marathon I'm seeing references everywhere and then Fireship hits it with the "one browser to rule them all" 😂
I use Microsoft Edge + default Google search + uBlock 😭
thats like mixing all the sodas at the soda fountain
Windows asked me 3 times if I was sure I wanted to switch to Chrome. A year later Edge stole all my chrome data and made a cloud backup before I even knew what was going on.
0:36 I love that bill gates photo
I'm in love with this format.
Doesn't Apple have monopoly over xcode, final cut pro
These softwares are only available for Apple machines
Why aren't they fined for not making it available across other OS?
Nobody wants to use that shit. Xcode is terrible. Even if they owned IntelliJ as a macOS exclusive, you'd still have VS Code as a competitor. And Final Cut Pro isn't a "must-have" either, it too has alternatives like Premiere Pro (great) or DaVinci Resolve (free).
Not the same thing. False equivalency.
If Apple is a monopolist over Xcode then i am a monopolists over my shit too
The amount of companies using the same stock Lionhead logo is craaazy
bro misspelled the title
Did they fix the title? What was it when you posted this comment?
@ChloekabanOfficial there was two to's
@@startrooper453 Oh, okay.
"Got off Easy"
Bruh. That was savage.
So lemme get this straight: They filed a lawsuit because of the chrome market, but all the reasons for that they have are Google search engine related and not chrome??? It'll prolly not go through.
This isn't that weird. Using dominance in one market to monopolize another is actually pretty common subject of antimonopoly laws.
Imagine a conglomerate both runs a railroad and produces steel. If they refused to carry other companies' steel on their railway (or charged them more), that would be totally illegal.
Google is using their dominance over browsers to maintain dominance in search. They have a browser and only have their own search engine be the default, pushing out other search engines.
No the lawsuit is about Google having such large power in the browser world (their 66%), which they started to use to shape the internet in their favour with manifest V3. Where ads become harder to block, meaning their ad business can become more profitable. More views > More ad placement customers & people starting to pay for their ad free subscriptions (e.g. TH-cam premium) < which they btw recently increased 50% in price.
They are the advertiser, ad placement (TH-cam & the Google search engine) & the vehicle (Chrome)
"...and in the darkness bind them" damn that went hard.
so far, (is incredible when u know this) but GOOGLE one of the top TECH companies in the WORLD has failed at every project they have launched 296 so far. except google search, adsense, maps, gmail,. android, and chrome. I really dont know how they keep that stupid CEO
Well those are pretty damn incredible products and just as well ubiquitous
also was the stupid CEO that lunched some of those projects before he as CEO
@@ImpostorModanica"Incredible"? I have bridge to sell you.
And out of those projects, Android was bough, YT was bought, adsense was bought. Only maps, gmail, Chrome and search were actually made by Google.
Did you just say that Google failed at every project and then mention a list of 6 their products that alone make up most of company's revenue? Your comment is contradictory.
I prefer brave search to google, because the AI gives me better results
google just returns SEO and ads 🤷🏻♂️
Yeh same here
I haven't used Google Search as a main search engine since, about 2015
3:07 - Nobody exists on purpose. Nobody belongs anywhere.
Wrong, we do because God made us and gave us purpose
@@averdadeeumaso4003 There is no god.
Chrome without Google will be fucked
Bad with it, worse without it
Nah, it's just gonna stop fucking you from behind
chrome should join internet explorer
Chrome without Google already exists in the form of the dozen other Chromium based browsers out there like Edge and Brave and Opera.
@@TimCortesior plain chromium if you just want to suffer
Google's main profit is ads and if they start to shape the internet in their favour (ad placement with manifest V3) with the amount of power they have in the browser competition, then yeah...
They became the advertiser, the ad placement (TH-cam & Google) & the vehicle (Chrome)
If they start?
Google literally already shaped internet as they saw fit. Every single website on Earth has to bow down to their rules. By now Internet is their plaything.
Adblocking still works well enough on v3, I don't really see how losing some ground on the security vs convenience debate is that big a deal. FF has always smashed Chrome in this area and forks use super fast native blocking engines baked right into their codebase.
nobody is forced to use chrome. every iphone uses safari …
user tracking should be forbidden. that part of ads i don't like
3:57 nah edge is rhe best browser to download other browsers
Last quote goes hard
Zen is so underrated
shitty security, many zero days
@@o1-preview oh really? Any similar browsers that you think are better?
@@robertstan9733 Mercury
@@robertstan9733 ff is there. its also not their fault really, small development teams vs the entire world is crazy
That throws a wrench into Google's plans to dominate the whole online experience. If they can't dictate what Chrome does with ads, and benefit from it, then they're back to Square One.
I don't know if this is a stretch, but wouldn't Trump's disruption to the legal system affect this case and outright dismiss it. A case of conflict of interest?
The sponsorblock skip was particularly hilarious this time around.
Spin off Chrome as its own company and sell all shares on the open market, limiting the amount of shares any company, institution or person can hold to secure actual change.
This is the only way it makes sense, otherwise the monopoly will just change hands, not stop being a monopoly.
I hope this actually happens and TH-cam will be next, followed by all the other platforms and services with over 1 billion active users.
And where is this new Chrome company getting its revenue from?
@@kugelblitz2001 If Google pays Apple $20 billion a year to be the default search engine on Safari, imagine how much they would have to pay Chrome to remain the default search engine on Chrome with more than triple the user market share compared to Safari.
I can't believe it took Google 11 hours to recommend to me this video, that is just unacceptable!
I mean, if a company stops saying dont be evil, how would you not see this coming
They're all the same. The fact that yall think one mega corporation is evil and one isn't is hilarious.
the real embarrassment comes from the 90% of Google users just searching a website's homepage instead of just punching in the url in the address bar
1:15 Did this poorly-made LLM just called us _hipsters?_
There's a *lot* of low frequency rumble in the audio on this. Might be worth putting a low pass filter @fireship.
That would be a high pass filter. Low pass filters let low frequencies pass
When arch Linux video? I use arch btw
cool, but I use ARCH btw too
I got a chrome ad clicking this video
I like my browser drippy bruh
i like my browser iliggygillygul bruh
3:29 I wasn't expecting that, made me laugh out loud
no problemo
Google creating Gemini: "And just a pinch of nihilism... oops!"
They should break apart the entire company. That means: Android, Chrome, Google, double-click, WayMo, waze, and TH-cam - ESPECIALLY TH-cam!
Wouldn't that kill TH-cam immediately without Mama Google trucking money into it?
@@Quest3Games all the better. youtube deserves it.
@@Quest3Games Not if Elon bought it, fired 80% of its employees, and stopped censoring its users.
@@Quest3Gamesnah TH-cam actually makes money now, on its own without google weighing it down it would probably do better
“When software is free, it means that you are the product.”
Bruh
2013 called.