Cell Potential Problems - Electrochemistry

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 275

  • @TheOrganicChemistryTutor
    @TheOrganicChemistryTutor  ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Electrochemistry - Free Formula Sheet: bit.ly/3NLeylq
    Chemistry 2 Final Exam Review: th-cam.com/video/lSmJN1_uVpI/w-d-xo.html
    Chapter 17 - Video Lessons: www.video-tutor.net/electrochemistry.html

  • @MATHBOSS287
    @MATHBOSS287 4 ปีที่แล้ว +574

    for years people have been wanting to see the owner of this golden voice

    • @berchin89
      @berchin89 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      fax

    • @Engr9
      @Engr9 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      When do you think he will reveal his face?

    • @asapstudy6065
      @asapstudy6065 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      True 😢 like just tell the username !! We will find you

    • @lalalanding234
      @lalalanding234 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes

    • @ezudinezere6034
      @ezudinezere6034 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      For years people have been wanting to hear the voice of this golden typer😜😜

  • @jonathanmendoza3154
    @jonathanmendoza3154 6 ปีที่แล้ว +513

    dude, you legit explain things much better than my professor and my two textbooks combined together.

    • @RB-nh1om
      @RB-nh1om 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      100% it only took me 5 minutes of this video to understand the whole thing. Teachers need to learn from this guy

    • @Guy_OFFICIAL
      @Guy_OFFICIAL 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Idris Jalen wow my account got hacked in the process because instapwn is a total scam!

    • @incognito6751
      @incognito6751 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Guy_OFFICIAL Both of these accounts are bots which were created at the same time to make Instapwn appear more authentic.

    • @_minus.X3RO
      @_minus.X3RO 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      lets clone him and let the clones replace all teacher on the planet...
      For a brighter future!

  • @nicolezalesak6281
    @nicolezalesak6281 4 ปีที่แล้ว +96

    I hope you aren't sick of hearing this; THANK YOU!!! I was stuck on this unit for two days. Your explanations are very clear and concise.

    • @jesus_saves_15
      @jesus_saves_15 ปีที่แล้ว

      Me too I was stuck and couldn't skip it either and he came and saved me

  • @n.kxznnn
    @n.kxznnn 6 ปีที่แล้ว +73

    this channel is legit helping me a lot with all my struggles in chem.

  • @Feyangel23
    @Feyangel23 5 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    For anyone wondering why at 7:40 the answer is -2.20V it's because electrolytic cells can have negative cell potentials which is the difference between galvonic cells.
    When electrolytic cells have negative cell potential values they need energy to run. It's like when your smartphone is dead; you need to recharge it first before it can run again

  • @tbdrosa8542
    @tbdrosa8542 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    another neat way to determine which cell potential is "flipped" is which is more negative. The more negative a cell potential is, the more it wishes to be oxidized.
    And when we oxidize reactions in problems similar to these we will flip the reaction, which also can flip the sign to its corresponding reduction potential

    • @shan8613
      @shan8613 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks!!!

    • @euroeuro12
      @euroeuro12 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Tnx

  • @kronosthewarrior9205
    @kronosthewarrior9205 4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Thank you dude you are saving me from having anxiety attacks. Thank you thank you thank you.

  • @Quote_It_official
    @Quote_It_official 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    6 years and this is still golden.....i hope next generation finds this helpful too

  • @Lol98-wk18
    @Lol98-wk18 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Do you know how many lives you’re saving by making these videos ? 🥺 thank you so much 😭😭

  • @KaavyaVijaykumar
    @KaavyaVijaykumar 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    i like, literally suck at chemitry and this man made me understand it so good, and he did it better than all my tutors and teachers

  • @amina23414
    @amina23414 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Now we are in 2024 and i'm watching ur vidéos all i want to say to you it's just you're perfect and thaaaaaank you for everything😻

  • @georgesadler7830
    @georgesadler7830 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Professor Organic Chemistry Tutor, thank you for showing How to analyze and calculate cell potential of a galvanic cell/ electrolytic cell in AP/General Chemistry. In this video, the examples are simple to follow and understand from start to finish. This is an error free video/lecture on TH-cam TV with the Organic Chemistry Tutor.

  • @kingdomheartsroxas99
    @kingdomheartsroxas99 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    First three seconds and you already answered my question I had thanks man!!!

    • @fauzansyauqi2815
      @fauzansyauqi2815 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      so fast huh

    • @adamc4640
      @adamc4640 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      fr so simple and i was wondering that after like 2 assignments and test tmr

    • @mysussyisnotbaka
      @mysussyisnotbaka 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sus

  • @johndawson6057
    @johndawson6057 5 ปีที่แล้ว +80

    You're the best man. I friggin' love you!

    • @sangeetakala1797
      @sangeetakala1797 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      😂😂😂😂

    • @HimanshuRaj-ry2gx
      @HimanshuRaj-ry2gx 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You gay

    • @sangeetakala1797
      @sangeetakala1797 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@HimanshuRaj-ry2gx to whom are u saying that??? 🤔🤔🤔

    • @aleks456
      @aleks456 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Bro quit dreaming

    • @fawazali8490
      @fawazali8490 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The heros we need (sakht launda)

  • @alirezasadeghifar3815
    @alirezasadeghifar3815 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I love your voice! Your videos are so helpful!

  • @ankledrew8150
    @ankledrew8150 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Thank you! Using you for entrace test. Happy teacher's day!

  • @Cryptomaniac719
    @Cryptomaniac719 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I’m studying chemistry in Greece and your videos are amazingly helpful..Thank you ;) !!!

  • @antyey6437
    @antyey6437 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you, I can't describe how much I appreciate the lessons you give us.

  • @ramao79615
    @ramao79615 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    the way he says reaction🥺❤️3:41

  • @elegiacleena
    @elegiacleena ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Never knew that a study ASMR also exists ❤

  • @zancrowc9642
    @zancrowc9642 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Im 10 min this guys explain 4 lessons better than a "AP chem" teacher did in combined of 4-5 hours =_=

  • @nofacefreak8986
    @nofacefreak8986 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    You just explained what my teacher told us in 1 and half hour in freaking 10 mins

    • @sumaiyarashid8930
      @sumaiyarashid8930 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      true dat my teacher just confused me so much that i had to revisit the whole thing again

  • @jesus_saves_15
    @jesus_saves_15 ปีที่แล้ว

    You don't know how much thankful I am .. i understood many other stuff too
    Thank you ❤

  • @sneha3927
    @sneha3927 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Explanation was too simple.... Thanks 😊

  • @ShubhraShandilya29
    @ShubhraShandilya29 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Explained wonderfully!
    Thanks!!

  • @JulianHernandez-bt7il
    @JulianHernandez-bt7il 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    "A standard cell potential has to be positive" can't believe my professor never mentioned that in lecture man haha

    • @avationmusic
      @avationmusic 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Keep in mind when he says that it has to be positive, he means the overall potential for the entire cell, and it only applies to galvanic cells. Electrolytic cells can be negative because they are powered by an external source. You can also use the value of the cell potential to determine if the reaction will be in equilibrium (Ecell = 0) or if it’s spontaneous (Ecell = positive) or non-spontaneous (Ecell = negative). Hopefully you knew this already but I’m adding it just in case :)

    • @AverageMED
      @AverageMED 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@avationmusic can an electrolytic cell be positive?? I am having a hard time wondering why they ever would be

    • @user-pr5py8cw9x
      @user-pr5py8cw9x 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@AverageMED He's wrong. An electrolytic cell, by definition, has a negative Ecell. Always negative. Never positive. First time I've seen him make a big mistake in a video.

    • @AverageMED
      @AverageMED 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@user-pr5py8cw9x yeah i was gonna say by definition it has to be negative

  • @somasch7552
    @somasch7552 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    THANK YOU SO MUCH ILY YOU ARE SAVING MY GRADES

  • @srinuchandaka3959
    @srinuchandaka3959 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Thank you!!!
    *Organic Chemistry Tutor*

  • @Yashi-x5h
    @Yashi-x5h 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    oh my god you cleared my greatest doubt i had since morning tmrw is my exam thnkusm

  • @fluffyflooff3270
    @fluffyflooff3270 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thankss! Ezpz to understand ur explanation ! My brain feels relaxed now😃 hopefully i will get my quiz n test excellent marks!🥺

  • @artswithus262
    @artswithus262 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like ur way of speaking .You are just fabulous.👍👍👍👍👏👏👏

  • @freezer-monkey
    @freezer-monkey 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bro this guy is a better teacher then my actual teacher

  • @CaptainKanundrum
    @CaptainKanundrum 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Thank you so much for this video, it is exactly what I was looking for! One question: for cases like Ag/Mg reaction, why does multiplying the Ag equation by 2 not change the cell potential at all? I keep thinking that if I have to move twice as many electrons, the potential should double.

    • @arhamralam
      @arhamralam 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Cell potential is an intensive property, so it will not change even if the number of moles vary.

    • @xii-cb.s.gokulakannan1945
      @xii-cb.s.gokulakannan1945 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      hi dude the basic thing of this chapter is electrode potential do not change with how many moles , pressure , temperature you add the ep donot change . i think my answer would clear your doubt .

  • @anvayaiyer5614
    @anvayaiyer5614 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You saved me some tears... Yet again

  • @Villainous12
    @Villainous12 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    U are a legend professor. God bless U😇😇

  • @arielwise9664
    @arielwise9664 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    what do you do when you're not told if it's electrolytic or galvanic?

  • @frankthetank8748
    @frankthetank8748 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    please dont ever stop making videos please

  • @7dnein944
    @7dnein944 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you very much for this my friend, much obliged

  • @sangeetakala1797
    @sangeetakala1797 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing explanation dude 👏👏👏👏👍👍👍👌👌👌👌

  • @ab123tube4
    @ab123tube4 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great.please make video how to affect using active and inert electrode on the product of electrolysis

  • @Sammi-nm8bg
    @Sammi-nm8bg 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    dude. if i had a million bucks i would give it all to you

  • @sajjadkazemi6186
    @sajjadkazemi6186 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You are a real teacher!
    Thanks!!!❤️

  • @ridhima1933
    @ridhima1933 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank u so much sir, u cleared my confusion

  • @catewebb6430
    @catewebb6430 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    loving this content

  • @joshm8256
    @joshm8256 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    1 bit of constructive feedback: invest in a quality microphone.
    I love your videos; you are great at explaining things.

  • @arexqui625
    @arexqui625 6 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    In Standard cell potential don't we subtract the cell potential of cathode from anode as per formula?

    • @shubhamsinghhh99
      @shubhamsinghhh99 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bkr video h nhi hai isko knowledge

    • @chisomovuegbe4248
      @chisomovuegbe4248 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Mohammad nasir you do, but he reversed one of the reactions, that’s why he still got the correct answer despite adding them.

    • @manishbarnwal3816
      @manishbarnwal3816 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@shubhamsinghhh99 I think you should check yourself before accusing him.

    • @jerymarschmid6176
      @jerymarschmid6176 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      yeap it should, that's how is shown on the books

    • @thabangmoloi1553
      @thabangmoloi1553 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      His half rxn are standard hence he can choose to reverse the other one

  • @ritapatel9246
    @ritapatel9246 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is awesome way to understand... Thanks👍👍👌👌

  • @vanessaduru1678
    @vanessaduru1678 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    He's sooo good🎉❤

  • @Ρατζ
    @Ρατζ 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    You are best ...
    India 🇮🇳

    • @sneharyan9701
      @sneharyan9701 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Where the hell comes india man.. can you see anybody commenting usa france Germany etc.. don't make india look bad because of your stupidity. . I am indian also but for god sake don't write everywhere i am from india love from india

  • @anivaldosambo7394
    @anivaldosambo7394 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    YOU SAVED ME AGAIN!!!

  • @Bohnr
    @Bohnr 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I always have to speed these up, but good stuff

  • @lanercat36
    @lanercat36 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Oohhh!!! I get it!! Light bulb. Thank you so much!!

  • @1messi_THEGOAT
    @1messi_THEGOAT หลายเดือนก่อน

    I can’t believe this appeared after just throwing such question yesterday during chemistry exams 😢

  • @punishmentbegins
    @punishmentbegins 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You're the best! Thank you.

  • @govindarajuankadala8563
    @govindarajuankadala8563 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Best explanation

  • @davidcherilus9112
    @davidcherilus9112 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Can anyone explain equation 3 ? Thank you.
    In contrast to a galvanic cell,the most positive standard reduction half reaction within an electrolytic cell is the one that experiences oxidation.
    With that in mind, Why did he reverse iron half reaction and not the Br half reaction (where Br would be our anode and Fe be our cathode? Ered of cathode - E red of anode.

    • @catastrophicdemon949
      @catastrophicdemon949 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Br is the one receiving the electron therefore it is a reduction and Fe is losing electron therefore it’s a oxidation. Knowing that reduction is cathode and oxidation is anode. Using the formula Ered-Eox or Ecathode - Eanode = 1.09-(0.77) which is 0.32

  • @themaninred7352
    @themaninred7352 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Hi question, does molarity of the substances affect the cell potential?

    • @jarodhans3758
      @jarodhans3758 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      yes it does. for calculating cell potential in standard conditions (1M) use the method in this video. for concentrations other than 1M use nernst equation

  • @ruthkoi8165
    @ruthkoi8165 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow! Thanks man you're helping me alot ❤🙏

  • @rosey5357
    @rosey5357 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    omgg thank you so much! This literally helped me alot!

  • @nurislamshimul5402
    @nurislamshimul5402 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    clear lecture.... thank u

  • @pydipaparao5379
    @pydipaparao5379 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    should we multiply the E°cell value when equation is being multiplied?

    • @TheKennethfilm
      @TheKennethfilm 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No since the standard potential is in volts and not in volts/mole.

  • @atttomole
    @atttomole 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Interesting. It’s a bit confusing when it comes to the redox flow battery. Can you do it for iron redox flow battery reactions.

  • @sumaiyarashid8930
    @sumaiyarashid8930 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this video was helpful

  • @brianreyes5831
    @brianreyes5831 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    thanks for always making it all seem easy :))

  • @ahmedader4283
    @ahmedader4283 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thankz 😭😰 u saved me

  • @kashrathore3146
    @kashrathore3146 5 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    How did u get -2.20 ..I got +2.20 in the last question

    • @mohammadrezasharghi8648
      @mohammadrezasharghi8648 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In an electrolytic cell, you have to put in energy to do the electrolysis, so Gibbs free energy is positive here, which means cell potential needs to be negative, not positive.

  • @mishal81
    @mishal81 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you sm :) god bless u. sending love your way

  • @nurulhdm
    @nurulhdm 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Question- why the volts are added together inside of subtracting it? Wouldnt you be incorporating based on the following emf formula E cell= E cathode - E anode instead?

  • @Fifi00416
    @Fifi00416 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i was soooo confused, thank you sooooo much

  • @zoudek123
    @zoudek123 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    In 10:56, +109, pls tell me how to get that number..

  • @nourahd6994
    @nourahd6994 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Why i didnt watch your videos a couple of years ago 😣

  • @ethioupdatedinfo.
    @ethioupdatedinfo. 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    On question 3) (7:35) you don't multiply Fe^2+ potential by two. So the overall result should be -0.45v not +0.32v. If this is the answer why galvanic cell result negative?

  • @wallflower1852
    @wallflower1852 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wanna hug and kiss this guy. Thank you so much!

  • @rajendrakumarmakwana8941
    @rajendrakumarmakwana8941 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much
    God 😇🙏👼 bless you all😄😇

  • @bbboyyy51
    @bbboyyy51 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Please tell me why souldn't we need to balance the last example?

  • @biancafrancis7788
    @biancafrancis7788 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    how did you come up with the reduction potentials?

  • @sanchitbolinjkar8291
    @sanchitbolinjkar8291 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Electrode potential is an intensive property and non additive in nature so we can't directly add it the way you did. Instead what we have to do is add all the reactions and equate it's Gibbs free energy to the final free energy. Could you pls solve this confusion for me?

  • @emmanueljohngallo8007
    @emmanueljohngallo8007 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks master 🙇

  • @aliyaiffat5217
    @aliyaiffat5217 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Forgalvanic cell cell potential hs to be positive. For electrolytic cell it can be negative positive or zero.

  • @lizardis89
    @lizardis89 ปีที่แล้ว

    I learned in class the formula for ecell was to subtract ecathode and eanode? Can you explain why you are adding them?

    • @101nevergiveup
      @101nevergiveup 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is the same problem I'm facing 😭

  • @inaj9455
    @inaj9455 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you po

  • @BrownCookieBoy
    @BrownCookieBoy 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    First you say the cell potential has to be positive, then you introduce a nonspontaneous reaction (were the potential is negative) without explaining.
    Im confused.
    So i wouldve had the wrong answer if i flipped the Standard for aluminum so i could do 1,66 - 0,535?

    • @giordicsaga
      @giordicsaga 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      same here! XP

    • @iubescman
      @iubescman 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      for galvanic cell, that's the rule that it must be positive. in electrolytic cell it can be either

  • @winproduction7585
    @winproduction7585 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir

  • @skygazer2678
    @skygazer2678 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks man!

  • @shrdani
    @shrdani 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    THANK U MAN

  • @brennan7846
    @brennan7846 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just wanted to know if the balancing of the electrons changed the cell potential for my homework. Thankfully I have found somewhere where it says that it does not change. Where else can I find the answer to this question? Like actually I was surfing this channels videos to find this answer.

  • @alphajohnalbert4517
    @alphajohnalbert4517 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Where did they get the value of Voltage?

  • @kehdu
    @kehdu 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you

  • @ZainabOyetola
    @ZainabOyetola ปีที่แล้ว

    Will the cell potential value for each reaction be given ?

  • @Roshankc12
    @Roshankc12 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good explain

  • @lost_saint.
    @lost_saint. 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    5:51 how did you get those cell potentials

  • @omsingharjit
    @omsingharjit 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why cell potential of lead acid battery is 2volt if lead and sulpher potential is much lower ????

  • @khnithhgor9698
    @khnithhgor9698 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    when the electrons are present on the same side then which reaction is to be inversed and on what basis?

    • @andrewquintana2068
      @andrewquintana2068 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      If a galvanic cell, invert the reaction that will result in a positive E.
      If an electrolytic cell, it depends what they are looking for. The "E" can be negative, positive, or zero. Thus it doesn't matter which you invert.

  • @velocity2516
    @velocity2516 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I will do my best

  • @binodanandbipin5960
    @binodanandbipin5960 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do we have to remember the data as you have shown in example 3..

  • @sajidmehmood6976
    @sajidmehmood6976 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dont you think when we subtract one from other with opposite charge the net result with sign of those which is larger term...as you did in case of secnd e.g ...suggest me please

    • @sajidmehmood6976
      @sajidmehmood6976 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      As in Ni and Fe eg. The net sign is negatve...
      I have read this eg in another book with Ni used as oxidation

    • @nathanmulopo9366
      @nathanmulopo9366 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@sajidmehmood6976 If Ni is used as oxidation it's wrong cause with half - reactions, one half - reaction must be reduced and the other oxidized . Both of them can't be oxidized. Fe is already oxidized

  • @whatsupwithtorii
    @whatsupwithtorii ปีที่แล้ว

    🩷🩷🩷💯Thankx you so much

  • @venusz6134
    @venusz6134 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    hmm I'm not quite understanding how he got +0.21V for Q2. After reversing the iron's rxn, it becomes an oxidation (anode) with E= +0.44. So should it be: E cell = E cat - E ano = -0.23 - 0.44 which is

    • @sandeepsammy9480
      @sandeepsammy9480 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Even I have the same doudt and going through the comments...so that anyone can reply me .

    • @sandeepsammy9480
      @sandeepsammy9480 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      If your doudt has clarified .. can you please tell ?

    • @venusz6134
      @venusz6134 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@sandeepsammy9480 Sure thing. For this question, it'd be helpful to arrange the half-rxns in the decreasing order of standard cell potential values - we will have Ni (-0.23V) then Fe (-0,44V) so Ni+2 rxn is reduction (cathode) and Fe+2 is oxidation (anode). The formula (Cathode - Anode) works according to the standard potential values of reduction half-rxn. Thus, since anode = -0.44, Cathode - Anode = -0.23 - (-0.44) = 0.23 + 0.44. Hope this helps :)

    • @venusz6134
      @venusz6134 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sandeepsammy9480 Also it's a galvanic cell meaning Cathode - Anode always > 0

    • @sandeepsammy9480
      @sandeepsammy9480 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@venusz6134 thankyou ...I understood ..thanks for the clarification

  • @IKRAMIKRAM-d9h
    @IKRAMIKRAM-d9h 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you soo much