@@FaridResponds Prophet Muhammad SAW Prophecized Abu bakr becoming a Caliph Chapter: The appointment of a caliph The Prophet said, "But I should say, 'O my head!' I feel like calling Abu Bakr and his son and appoint (the former as my successors lest people should say something or wish for something. Allah will insist (on Abu Bakr becoming a Caliph) and the believers will prevent (anyone else from claiming the Caliphate)," or "..Allah will prevent (anyone else from claiming the Caliphate) and the believers will insist (on Abu Bakr becoming the Caliph).- Sahih Bukhari 7217
CHECK for yourself, Whether the previous Religion of ALI was ZOROASTRIANISM Avestan religion? before he accepted the Quran. Why did his sons marry MAGI women from Persia?????
Not only that: Abu Bakr ibn Ali was born 38 AH Umar ibn Ali is a little disputed regarding his actual birth, but let's put him to the side. Uthmaan ibn Ali was born 39 AH Uthmaan ibn Affaan died 35 AH. As you should know Abu Bakr and Umar both died before Uthmaan. It's not only the fact that Ali named his children these names, but he named them these names long after the events the Shias point to have concluded and long after the death of these individuals. Allah knows best, but perhaps Ali knew that future people would try to pit him against these three legends and this is why he named them these honourable names, in a way to disprove the evil of the future.
@ShiaGojo Yes its not his real name, but it was ONLY HIS lakab. No one else had the lakab Abu Bakr, it was unique only to that one person, and Ali named his son after that one Abu Bakr. How do you explain that? And moreover, how do you explain Umar ibn Ali and Uthman ibn Ali?
@@Spidershia if I bring it to u authentically from ur own books that Ali RA named his son Abu Bakr would u leave Shiaism? And the fact that Abu Bakr wasn’t his actual name proves our point even further since there’s no one else it could be after but Abu bakr As Saddiq RA since it was a kunya for him
Abu Bakr and Umar were juggernauts their superiority can't be questioned, we see that when fitnah started to creep in after they passed away. Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "I am astonished at these women who were with me. As soon as they heard your voice, they hastened to screen themselves." `Umar said, "O Allah's Apostle! You have more right to be feared by them." Then he addressed (those women) saying, "O enemies of your own souls! Do you fear me and not Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) ?" They replied. "Yes, for you are a fearful and fierce man as compared with Allah's Messenger (ﷺ)." On that Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said (to `Umar), "By Him in Whose Hands my life is, whenever Satan sees you taking a path, he follows a path other than yours." [Bukhari 3294] It was probably like an Eid for shaytan when Umar died because now they could sow the discord of fitnah.
It is well known to all Muslims of sound mind that the Fitnah between the Muslims after the Prophet ﷺ has nothing to do with our religious belief. This was a political disagreement, May Allāh forgive all of the companions. May Allāh have mercy on Uthmaan, ‘Ali, Abu Bakr, Umar, ‘Aishah, Talhah and all of the companions who had this disagreement. Islam never changed after the death of the Prophet ﷺ, anyone who changes it because of politics is misguided and is an innovator.
@@-------....___ Go cope with your insecurities somewhere else. The ummah has dealt with extremists like you throughout many centuries, never has your kind of people led Muslims to victory.
What an incredible point raised by Farid. Hats off to you my man. If Ali r.a was appointed by Prophet peace and blessings be upon him the ansar would've been the first to give baya to Ali r.a and even they would've fought Abu Bakr r.a or other quresh tribe. Also the second was very subtle. Sunnis could've written history according to their beliefs but they were true.!!!!
I've just watched a video on how Imam al-Bukhari used his Sahih al-Bukhari to specifically defend the Ansar against the Shia in the most unique way. However it wasn't mentioned why Shia hated the Ansar specifically. Masya Allah just a few minutes later your video pop up to answer that. Alhamdulillah.
It’s because the Ansar were better Sahaba supporters and die hard believers compared to those whom promised Al Husayn Ibn Ali RA support strength and love yet betrayed him like they betrayed his father and brother before !!!
Abu bakr was chosen by the will of Allah so is all the other caliphates after him, and we can see what happened after that the Muslims defeated the two biggest empires of their time. and spread Islam to almost everywhere,
Only the Rashidoon i.e. Abu Bakr as sidiq Radiallahu Anhu to Hasan ibn Ali Aleh salam , after that we don't believe anything about the kings that came from Bani Ummayah! Even Muawiya Radiallahu Anhu is considered to be a King!
@@SuperGulamali Ok, lets go with this. But where did abu bakr get this idea from? The prophet did not suggest anyone so why did he do this? Wich sunnah is he following? And omar did then something completly different with othman. But I have one question. If only 5 peoole are enough like with abu bakr or othman then was abu bakr al baghdadi the caliph of the umah? Because there was a grouo of muslims who elected him?
WRONG, ISLAM stay back within Arabia, only the QURAN was spread across the nations. Because the TAWRAT was never PREACHED, even though the QURAN command to JUDGE by the TAWRAT(according to the condition mentioned in QURAN 5 48, that the QURAN has GUARDIAN over the TAWRAT) The Arabs never preached the TAWRAT even though they were fully aware that the LAST prophet Muhammad and ZAYD IBN THABIT, Judged by the TAWRAT and took the Law for the crime of Adultery from the TAWRAT.
Sulaym continued to say: “I think that I met all of these people and I asked each one of them privately so some of them kept quiet and did not answer at all and hid it from me. Some of them informed me and then said: “We were surrounded be fitnah, our eyes and ears were overpowered and this was at the time when Abu Bakr claimed that he had heard the Holy Prophet (SAW) saying: “We Ahlulbayt are those whom Allah has blessed with reputation and has chosen the Hereafter for instead of this world for us and He does not want that for us Ahlulbayt He joins Nubuwat and Imamat.” and this is the argument that Abu Bakr used against Ali (AS) when he was brought to pay allegiance. So he confirmed it and four people who in our eyes were good and had done nothing wrong stood as witnesses - Abu Ubeydah, Saalim, Umar and Ma’az and we thought that they had said truth.
Sunnis; love all the the companions of Muhammed. Peace and blessings on all of them. Shia; only love selected few from Prophets family....and hate the rest as enemies of Allah. Becomes very obvious which side to choose. 🧐
You clearly don’t know our beliefs; we don’t believe every single companion of the Prophet is in hell nor did we ‘select’ who is in hell and who is in heaven. It’s a well-known fact, in Hadith and history, that the sahaba fought one another after the prophets death.
@@AJ10.99Even if you are not serious, you should never encourage someone to worship anything or anyone other than Allah. Instead, it is better to say 'may Allah guide you' or something of that sort. We should generally respond to ugly speach with beautiful speech, Insha'Allah. So may Allah make us amongst those whom use their tongue for beautiful speech, ameen Allahumma ameen.
@@mujahid5735 I don't encourage them to do anything. They think they have the true religion I just remind them that they worship a human. And I am serious
@@AJ10.99 No one worhips a human. But hey at least we dont accept such hadiths of bukhari "Now then, I am going to tell you something which (Allah) has written for me to say. I do not know; perhaps it portends my death, so whoever understands and remembers it, must narrate it to the others wherever his mount takes him, but if somebody is afraid that he does not understand it, then it is unlawful for him to tell lies about me. Allah sent Muhammad with the Truth and revealed the Holy Book to him, and among what Allah revealed, was the Verse of the Rajam (the stoning of married person (male & female) who commits illegal sexual intercourse, and we did recite this Verse and understood and memorized it. Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) did carry out the punishment of stoning and so did we after him. I am afraid that after a long time has passed, somebody will say, 'By Allah, we do not find the Verse of the Rajam in Allah's Book,' and thus they will go astray by leaving an obligation which Allah has revealed." (Sahih al-Bukhari 6830) Or: "'A'isha (Allah be pleased with, her) reported that it had been revealed in the Holy Qur'an that ten clear sucklings make the marriage unlawful, then it was abrogated (and substituted) by five sucklings and Allah's Apostle (ﷺ) died and it was before that time (found) in the Holy Qur'an (and recited by the Muslims)." Sahih Muslim 1452a
May Allah reward your parents This channel was very important for me during my formative years as a teenager May Allah preserve and protect you my brother Farid Your straight-forward, well mannered and sometimes sarcastic methods appealed to me Now I have more grey hairs than you haha
Farid Please make a playlist refuting Hisham Al Masry. Please you're the only one that can refute and put him in place. I'd appreciate if you tackle his arguments. Much love akhi and May Allah bless you!
Great video. Simply explained. Always tough on the deniers of the truth. We ask Allah to guide us all and the misguided amongst the Shi'a who are upon another religion, not islam that's for sure. Keep up the good work, cool, calm and collected always the best approach to dawah to the Deen of Allah, Al Islam.
Aqidah Al-Wasitiyyah by Shaykh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah with commentary by Shaykh Uthaymeen may Allāh be pleased with them. But if this is a bit too large, read Kitab at Tawhid by Shaykh Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahāb, May Allāh have mercy on him. There are others like Usool Al-Thalathah as well. My advise is that to learn about Aqidah but to not neglect the recitation and understanding of the the Qur’aan. The Qur’aan supersedes any other writing of knowledge, Allāh’s revelation has too much wisdom to be ignored.
Salafis will misguide you by advising you to read Wasitiyyah or commentaries by Salafis. Just read the standard aqida book of Muslims WITHOUT any commentary - aqida tahawiyyah.
Nice ma sha'a Allah Allahumma barik lak ameen It's really true when one thinks about it, aws and khazraj could've just said that they're on their territory now but they didn't, also if they all knew about Rasoolu Allah salla Allahu alayhi wa sallam appointing Ali radiya Allahu anh (and mind you, news spread fast and it would be before his death), then everyone would speak up, but they didn't
It reaches to his son, Muhammad Ibn Abu Bakr. And you should know he fought against his sister, Aisha, at the battle of Jamal. And your bloodline has nothing to do with whether you are righteous or not.
@@thatshiairaqi9886 So it reaches back to Abu Bakr then 😂. Btw, do you think Muhammad ibn Abu Bakr would approve of swine cursing his sister as a disbeliever, despite their own disagreements? 🤡
@@thatshiairaqi9886 Your bloodline has nothing to do with whether you are righteous or not? I wonder why some shias hold descendants of Muhammad s.a.w centuries or even millenia after to a higher degree.
@@thatshiairaqi9886 wrong, jamal wasn't against Ali ibn Abi talib, rather khawarij in army of Ali... You are dumb and stupid, ever wondered what happened with spoils of war of jamal? Their were no spoils because their was no war...
@@thatshiairaqi9886 Seems like you’ve forgotten whom Asma bint Abdur Rehman ibn Abi Bakr. Don’t forget the grandfather of Fatima bint Hasan, the grandmother of Imam Ja’far. That was Talha Ibn Ubaydullah عليه السلام , the father in law of Hasnayn عليهم السلام. Or the Husband of Umm Kulthum رضي الله عنه , Umar عليه السلام. Just looking at the marriages b/w the Sahaba and Ahlulbayt is problematic for you guys, majority of Shi’a don’t even have the slightest idea that Imam Ja’far(& all after him) are descendants of Abu Bakr(twice) and Talha عليہم السلام جمعا
Brother Farid can i please ask you some questions i am really having tough times with doubts in islam.I am muslim but i want to clearify somethings can you plz take few minutes to answer my questions i will be really gratefull.PLEASE
Kinda unrelated but I don't know why Ali (r.a.) appointed Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr as governor of Egypt when he had an active role in the siege of Uthman's house
Because in reality there were lots of conflicts between the remaining parties at the time. Shia make it out as if everyone was against Ali and demonic for doing so, and Sunnis make it out as if Aisha, Uthman, Ali, Umar, Abu Bakr, Fatima, and all were happy as clams. The fact is Fatima had disagreements with the other caliphs. Aisha had disagreements with Ali, all of them disagreed about some moves or decisions the others made (that is natural in any politics by the way). And so Ali may have made this choice thinking he was doing something right but the opinion of the people was against it. That was not uncommon in the time after the Prophet.
As salamu alaikum Brother Farid, be careful with your bookshelf brother we dont want you to get hurt. Reminds me of the story of Al Jahiz, Allah protect us.
The issue is they believe the sahabah apostated. The main argument should be whose sources are authentic or fabricated. The rest will fall in place after that
That's really simple. In shia sources, imams used to do taqiyyah in minor issues and agree to sunnis in every single matter. That proves that imams were sunnis and shia whenever they see the imams giving verdict in support of sunnis, they made th excuse that imams did taqiyyah. But they were caught red handed when they were ascribing that imams did taqiyyah in even minor issues.
@@LeafSoulsProphet Muhammad SAW Prophecized Abu bakr becoming a Caliph Chapter: The appointment of a caliph The Prophet said, "But I should say, 'O my head!' I feel like calling Abu Bakr and his son and appoint (the former as my successors lest people should say something or wish for something. Allah will insist (on Abu Bakr becoming a Caliph) and the believers will prevent (anyone else from claiming the Caliphate)," or "..Allah will prevent (anyone else from claiming the Caliphate) and the believers will insist (on Abu Bakr becoming the Caliph).- Sahih Bukhari 7217
Though Ali (rta) was a great warrior and sahabi and the Prophet (saww) loved him . Muslims respect him, but t here is no comparison between Abu Bakr (rta) and Ali (rta). It was obvious to the Muslims that AbuBakr (rta ) was the obvious choice as was in the case of Umar (rta), finally a committee of senior Sahaba selected Utjman (rta), not Ali (rta). The Shia live on some other planet and use Ali (rta) and his ahle bayt and progeny for their schism
What blows my mind is all this happened whilst Rasullah wasn't buried so doesn't mean the Caliphate was the most pressing issue? Where's the morals and nobility Rasullah came to perfect. Imagine someone already asking about inheritance before burying the dead. We all know this title was a worldly attachment and since we got the starting wrong, good luck to us all...
Ali vs abu bakr....who should have been the first khalifa of Prophet muhammad SAW??? My dear sunni bros for the love of Allah, Prophet SAW had already decided that matter for us 2 years before his death & we must submit to that as true muslims. Muhammad (SAW) said directly to Ali (AS) in many SAHIH AHADITH: "YOU ARE MY KHALIFA OVER EVERY BELIEVER AFTER ME." The prophet couldnt have been more explicit than this. May Allah guide these sunnis to the haq.
Did u not watch this video when the prophet saw said that there were people in attendance yet when Abu bakr went to become the khalifa why did they submit to Abu bakr if the prophet saw genuinely meant that Ali Ra should be khalifa? Bear in mind they are more knowledgeable then us all
@nbw_v3nom195 LOL....firstly, do u care about the TRUTH??? Secondly, did u read my comment carefully?!! Had u done it, u wouldn't have missed the crucial point. Let me repeat that CRUCIAL POINT again. U can NEVER be a TRUE MUSLIM unless u SUBMIT to the prophet (SAW) & take him as HUJJAH (authority) in everything. Lastly, there is NO place for logic in islam when we have TEXTUAL PROOF available. May Allah guide u to the truth, which im upon.
Ali vs Abu bakr….who should have been the first Khalifa of prophet Muhammad ﷺ?? This was answered by Muhammed ﷺ before his passing in Sahih Muslim 2387: A'isha reported that Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) in his (last) illness asked me to call Abu Bakr, her father, and her brother too, so that he might write a document, for he feared that someone else might be desirous (of succeeding him) and that some claimant may say: “I have better claim to it” whereas Allah and the Faithful do not substantiate the claim of anyone but that of Abu Bakr.
@SuperGulamali Imam Ali giving bayah to abu bakr?? LOL Food for thought: Would u give bayah to someone if u considered him to be a LIAR & TRAITOR?? I doubt! :) Ur another victim of distorted history! :(
Asalam o Alaikum brother, I watched a video of exmuslim and he said that Akbar in Allah Hu Akbar means larger, Apuss also had a video about this Can you help me understand this meaning
Why did the ansar gather right after the prophets death to choose a caliph and they didnt even invite abu bakr even though he is supposedly the best of the companions. You also talk about saqifa if it was a real election even though there where only 3 muhajirun present and they even started to fight with the ansar (Tarikh al Tabari volume 9 page 194 in the english version)? And here comes the best part: "The Ansar said, or some of them said, "We will not give the oath of allegiance [to anyone] except 'Ali.""(Tarikh al Tabari volume 9 page 186 in the english version) They even wanted to elect two caliphs one for the muhajirun and one from the ansar. "Let us have a ruler from us and another from you, O men of Quraysh" (Tarikh al Tabari volume 9 page 194 in the english version). So yes saqifa was a very sincere election
No need, the Quran explicitly refutes him. Surah Al’i Imran 68: إِنَّ أَوْلَى ٱلنَّاسِ بِإِبْرَٰهِيمَ لَلَّذِينَ ٱتَّبَعُوهُ وَهَـٰذَا ٱلنَّبِىُّ وَٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوا۟ ۗ (Indeed, those who have the best claim to Abraham are his followers, this Prophet, and the believers.)
Moreover, Allah literally says in the Quran that Ansar are promised Jannah. In Surah Tawbah verse 100 (Quran 9:100): وَٱلسَّـٰبِقُونَ ٱلْأَوَّلُونَ مِنَ ٱلْمُهَـٰجِرِينَ *وَٱلْأَنصَارِ* وَٱلَّذِينَ ٱتَّبَعُوهُم بِإِحْسَـٰنٍۢ رَّضِىَ ٱللَّهُ عَنْهُمْ وَرَضُوا۟ عَنْهُ وَأَعَدَّ لَهُمْ جَنَّـٰتٍۢ تَجْرِى تَحْتَهَا ٱلْأَنْهَـٰرُ خَـٰلِدِينَ فِيهَآ أَبَدًۭا ۚ ذَٰلِكَ ٱلْفَوْزُ ٱلْعَظِيمُ ١٠٠ As for the foremost-the first of the Emigrants (Muhajireen) and the Helpers *(Ansar)*-and those who follow them in goodness, Allah is pleased with them and they are pleased with Him. And He has prepared for them Gardens under which rivers flow, to stay there for ever and ever. That is the ultimate triumph.
Neither you nor your scholars understand this verse. If you read it in Arabic, it clearly says (مِنَ ٱلْمُهَـٰجِرِينَ وَٱلْأَنصَارِ) The verse clearly states ‘from AMONG the Muhajirin and Ansar Allah is pleased with them and they are pleased with Him.’
@@thatshiairaqi9886Quiet down you ignorant. When Allah said وَنُنَزِّلُ مِنَ ٱلْقُرْءَانِ مَا هُوَ شِفَآءٌۭ وَرَحْمَةٌۭ لِّلْمُؤْمِنِينَ ۙ (we reveal “MINAL” Quran as a healing and mercy for the believers) Now tell me o’ knowledgeable one, does this mean that Allah only revealed some of the Quran because he used the word من?
@@thatshiairaqi9886 1. The next verse pointed out who are the exceptions and hypocrites. It doesn't mention muhajiroon from whom is Abu Bakr (ra). 2. Surah anfal at the end mentions those who gave shelter and aid to the muhajiroon (ie ansar) are almuminoon alhaqq. There is no "among". You have been refuted by Quran.
CHECK for yourself, Whether the previous Religion of ALI was the ZOROASTRIAN Avestan religion? before he accepted the Quran. Why did his sons marry MAGI women from Persia?????
@@shahidabdoullakhanzorovr1564 Sunan Tirmirzi 2180. The Sahaba Asked the prophet for an Idol just as the companions of Musa A.S asked him for one. If this Hadeeth applies to anyone it is the sahaba. Why do you ignore so many ahadeeth like this for example Hadeeth Hauz Bukhari 7049.
@@Aoun-HussainIt wasn’t an idol you liar. The words Dhaat Anwaat: Anwaat is the plural of the word nawt, which refers to anything that is hung up. Dhaat Anwaat is the tree on which these things were hung. You Shias cannot refrain from lying even for a second.
Would you or anyone explain why three khalifa was killed by fellow Muslims (not madmen) on top of that why Aisha attacked Ali or may I say why the battle of Camel took place. Was it all power struggle? If not where is the divinity? Politics? If not then when did political Islam took shape? Anyone?
Doesn’t make sense tho. Why would the Prophet SAW feel the need to announce to thousands and thousands of companions that "whomever I am his maula, Ali is his maula"? When you say Yemenis what do you mean? Cuz Ghadir is not in Yemen, Ghadir is between Mecca and Medinah. Some ppl say it’s cuz of a dispute between Ali and Khalid ibn Walid, but then why would the Prophet SAW not include Khalid when mentioning the famous line. Use logic, three months before the Prophet SAW passes away, he appoints his successor, whether people want to challenge on the linguistics of maula is up to them. End of the day, you’re are someone who believes Abu Bakr could appoint his successor on his deathbed but the Prophet SAW failed to make it clear to his ummah who his successor would be, that’s your narrative not mine.
Ghadir Kum was a gathering for Khutba. And there Prophet a.s was showing to musliks that Ali should be their FRIEND/MALWA,after a dispute some soldiers had with Ali
@@iMan-610 so you are questioning whether the Prophet SAW appointed a successor just because he chose to not do it in hajj. Who are you to say where the prophet SAW appoints his successor. If the Prophet SAW wanted to make a last khutba that he tells us many things amongst Ali being the master of the believers, why didn’t he just do it in hajj ? You see there is a clear reason for why the prophet SAW waited to do it after hajj. For you to come and say that is stupid, because your questioning the prophet SAW over something that is a necessity in religion- successorship, Quran proves why the Prophet SAW has to appoint Ali as his successor in 13:7.
@@A.A471 You actually refuted shia argument since according to them Prophet (saws) must have appointed Ali (ra) there because it was such a big event and why would he not do something as big as appointing caliph in a big event? But you admitted final hajj was bigger and bigness has no relevance. You misinterpret 13:7. "Don't be sad. Indeed Allah is with us" words which are so terrifying to shias that one shia to whom I mentioned these words started debating the bible out of nowhere just to run away from this topic lol.
Look there is no who is better between companions you know which company are higher in rank the first four Khalifa are the highest in the in rank Hazrat Hasan being the fifth Khalifa does not make him the fifth in Rank between companions it is some other companion I think it was the Ashraf mubashirin are the companions that are the best after the Khalifa and then the companions that took by a pledge to the prophet in the tree that they will take the Revenge of Hazrat Uthman even if it means they will die obviously the Qureshi had captured Hazrat Uthman show the companions and the prophet thought that he was killed this is the correct tarkeeb
@@shahidabdoullakhanzorovr1564 Look there is no who is better between companions you know which company are higher in rank the first four Khalifa are the highest in the in rank Hazrat Hasan being the fifth Khalifa does not make him the fifth in Rank between companions it is some other companion I think it was the Ashraf mubashirin are the companions that are the best after the Khalifa and then the companions that took by a pledge to the prophet in the tree that they will take the Revenge of Hazrat Uthman even if it means they will die obviously the Qureshi had captured Hazrat Uthman show the companions and the prophet thought that he was killed this is the correct tarkeeb
I’ve never heard of an election take place where 90% of the electorate aren’t there. The prophet was also being buried by ali when Abu bakr and Umar Ra were rushing to saqifa Nonetheless the best leader and Successor to the prophet pbuh was clear In terms of closeness to the prophet there were none closer to him than Ali In terms of bravery and loyalty that was shown uhud where most of the sahaba ran away but he stayed In terms of knowledge same thing again
@@Hamzathefirst No, in Saqifa Abu Bakr was elected by the Ansar and Umar. Afterwards he was elected by the rest of the community including Ali. "Ali could never had a say in it" The Imam who was appointed by God couldn't say anything as Islam and his divine right to rule were being taken over by hypocrites like Abu Bakr and Umar?? See where you Shia logic leads you?
Sunni believe that the umma was left to go astray after the death of the prophet to a point where they believe that aisha , a woman, was left with the burden of fatwa 😅😅😅 for men in their intimate issues 😅😅😅
@@tryemc3026 what's ridiculous is shias go so far to defame a person whom Allah protected her honour by revealing a surah in the divine Quran. Curse on you just as those slanderers were cursed.
on the contrary you do have evidence as the victors controlling the narrative by who you perceive as the best after the prophet and in which order. subhan allah its the order of the not appointed khalifs and theres 'authentic' hadeeths to back there supposed superiority up and in the exact order as they ruled. we see clearly though whose virtues are unrivaled when the prophet was actually alive and events were unfolding in real time and no sincere historian can argue otherwise to who allah and his messenger showed was the actual superior one
![Debunking Shia Claim: Abu Bakr and Omar killed Fatima!! [Mahdi Modarresi]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/u92BmUM3rxM/mqdefault.jpg)
![Debunking Shia Claim: Abu Bakr and Omar killed Fatima!! [Mahdi Modarresi]](/img/tr.png)
Ghadirkhumm.com - The Sunni Perspective
Barak Allah feek boss
Jazak Allahu khayran
@@FaridResponds Prophet Muhammad SAW Prophecized Abu bakr becoming a Caliph
Chapter: The appointment of a caliph
The Prophet said, "But I should say, 'O my head!' I feel like calling Abu Bakr and his son and appoint (the former as my successors lest people should say something or wish for something. Allah will insist (on Abu Bakr becoming a Caliph) and the believers will prevent (anyone else from claiming the Caliphate)," or "..Allah will prevent (anyone else from claiming the Caliphate) and the believers will insist (on Abu Bakr becoming the Caliph).- Sahih Bukhari 7217
@FaridResponds I had to remove some people who are spamming so you know
CHECK for yourself, Whether the previous Religion of ALI was ZOROASTRIANISM Avestan religion? before he accepted the Quran.
Why did his sons marry MAGI women from Persia?????
never ask a shia why Ali RA named his son Abu Bakr lol
Not only that:
Abu Bakr ibn Ali was born 38 AH
Umar ibn Ali is a little disputed regarding his actual birth, but let's put him to the side.
Uthmaan ibn Ali was born 39 AH
Uthmaan ibn Affaan died 35 AH. As you should know Abu Bakr and Umar both died before Uthmaan.
It's not only the fact that Ali named his children these names, but he named them these names long after the events the Shias point to have concluded and long after the death of these individuals.
Allah knows best, but perhaps Ali knew that future people would try to pit him against these three legends and this is why he named them these honourable names, in a way to disprove the evil of the future.
Wait. Ali R.A had sons other than Hasan and Hussein?
He didn’t 😂 Abu bakrs real name isn’t Abu bakr
@ShiaGojo Yes its not his real name, but it was ONLY HIS lakab. No one else had the lakab Abu Bakr, it was unique only to that one person, and Ali named his son after that one Abu Bakr. How do you explain that? And moreover, how do you explain Umar ibn Ali and Uthman ibn Ali?
@@Spidershia if I bring it to u authentically from ur own books that Ali RA named his son Abu Bakr would u leave Shiaism? And the fact that Abu Bakr wasn’t his actual name proves our point even further since there’s no one else it could be after but Abu bakr As Saddiq RA since it was a kunya for him
Abu Bakr and Umar were juggernauts their superiority can't be questioned, we see that when fitnah started to creep in after they passed away.
Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "I am astonished at these women who were with me. As soon as they heard your voice, they hastened to screen themselves." `Umar said, "O Allah's Apostle! You have more right to be feared by them." Then he addressed (those women) saying, "O enemies of your own souls! Do you fear me and not Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) ?" They replied. "Yes, for you are a fearful and fierce man as compared with Allah's Messenger (ﷺ)." On that Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said (to `Umar), "By Him in Whose Hands my life is, whenever Satan sees you taking a path, he follows a path other than yours."
[Bukhari 3294]
It was probably like an Eid for shaytan when Umar died because now they could sow the discord of fitnah.
Rasulilah saw clearly is making a distinction that umar is such a shaitan that even shaitan runs away from him lmao
@@Dub.wub121 Use other hadiths from this very book then.
😂😂😂😂😂
These are fake stories . Don’t make Umar superior then prophet .
It is well known to all Muslims of sound mind that the Fitnah between the Muslims after the Prophet ﷺ has nothing to do with our religious belief.
This was a political disagreement, May Allāh forgive all of the companions. May Allāh have mercy on Uthmaan, ‘Ali, Abu Bakr, Umar, ‘Aishah, Talhah and all of the companions who had this disagreement.
Islam never changed after the death of the Prophet ﷺ, anyone who changes it because of politics is misguided and is an innovator.
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543
Send the Hadith.
(I want to make sure I’m looking at the same one).
@@-------....___
Go cope with your insecurities somewhere else. The ummah has dealt with extremists like you throughout many centuries, never has your kind of people led Muslims to victory.
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 I would kindly ask you not to respond to this person anymore and leave them to the mods, barak Allah feek
Let's make dua that Allah keeps Farid's bookshelf strong or replace with what is better
Love both sahaba
Sunnis love ALL companions thats a proof Sunnah wal jummah is the correct Orthodox tradition.
who u calling sahaba?
@@cirylgane7920 both
@@AlishaXPurnama u def need to read ur books
@@cirylgane7920 why?
The bookshelf behind Farid gives me anxiety, its moments away from snapping
Lol I didnt see that is scary.
Ali Ali Ali
Ali Ali Ali
Ali Ali Ali
Ali ❤
What an incredible point raised by Farid. Hats off to you my man. If Ali r.a was appointed by Prophet peace and blessings be upon him the ansar would've been the first to give baya to Ali r.a and even they would've fought Abu Bakr r.a or other quresh tribe. Also the second was very subtle. Sunnis could've written history according to their beliefs but they were true.!!!!
I've just watched a video on how Imam al-Bukhari used his Sahih al-Bukhari to specifically defend the Ansar against the Shia in the most unique way. However it wasn't mentioned why Shia hated the Ansar specifically. Masya Allah just a few minutes later your video pop up to answer that. Alhamdulillah.
It’s because the Ansar were better Sahaba supporters and die hard believers compared to those whom promised Al Husayn Ibn Ali RA support strength and love yet betrayed him like they betrayed his father and brother before !!!
Abu bakr was chosen by the will of Allah so is all the other caliphates after him, and we can see what happened after that the Muslims defeated the two biggest empires of their time. and spread Islam to almost everywhere,
Only the Rashidoon i.e. Abu Bakr as sidiq Radiallahu Anhu to Hasan ibn Ali Aleh salam , after that we don't believe anything about the kings that came from Bani Ummayah!
Even Muawiya Radiallahu Anhu is considered to be a King!
but why was abu bakr suposedly elected and omar then chosen by abu bakr? What is the sunnah now to chose a caliph?
@@mohamedmah53 he wasn't selected by Abu Bakr he was suggested as a candidate not the same thing...
@@SuperGulamali Ok, lets go with this. But where did abu bakr get this idea from? The prophet did not suggest anyone so why did he do this? Wich sunnah is he following? And omar did then something completly different with othman.
But I have one question. If only 5 peoole are enough like with abu bakr or othman then was abu bakr al baghdadi the caliph of the umah? Because there was a grouo of muslims who elected him?
WRONG, ISLAM stay back within Arabia, only the QURAN was spread across the nations.
Because the TAWRAT was never PREACHED, even though the QURAN command to JUDGE by the TAWRAT(according to the condition mentioned in QURAN 5 48, that the QURAN has GUARDIAN over the TAWRAT)
The Arabs never preached the TAWRAT even though they were fully aware that the LAST prophet Muhammad and ZAYD IBN THABIT, Judged by the TAWRAT and took the Law for the crime of Adultery from the TAWRAT.
Sulaym continued to say: “I think that I met all of these people and I asked
each one of them privately so some of them kept quiet and did not answer at
all and hid it from me. Some of them informed me and then said: “We were
surrounded be fitnah, our eyes and ears were overpowered and this was at
the time when Abu Bakr claimed that he had heard the Holy Prophet (SAW)
saying: “We Ahlulbayt are those whom Allah has blessed with reputation
and has chosen the Hereafter for instead of this world for us and He does not
want that for us Ahlulbayt He joins Nubuwat and Imamat.” and this is the
argument that Abu Bakr used against Ali (AS) when he was brought to pay
allegiance. So he confirmed it and four people who in our eyes were good
and had done nothing wrong stood as witnesses - Abu Ubeydah, Saalim,
Umar and Ma’az and we thought that they had said truth.
Sunnis; love all the the companions of Muhammed. Peace and blessings on all of them.
Shia; only love selected few from Prophets family....and hate the rest as enemies of Allah.
Becomes very obvious which side to choose. 🧐
You clearly don’t know our beliefs; we don’t believe every single companion of the Prophet is in hell nor did we ‘select’ who is in hell and who is in heaven. It’s a well-known fact, in Hadith and history, that the sahaba fought one another after the prophets death.
@@thatshiairaqi9886just go worship ali
@@AJ10.99Even if you are not serious, you should never encourage someone to worship anything or anyone other than Allah. Instead, it is better to say 'may Allah guide you' or something of that sort. We should generally respond to ugly speach with beautiful speech, Insha'Allah. So may Allah make us amongst those whom use their tongue for beautiful speech, ameen Allahumma ameen.
@@mujahid5735 I don't encourage them to do anything.
They think they have the true religion I just remind them that they worship a human.
And I am serious
@@AJ10.99 No one worhips a human. But hey at least we dont accept such hadiths of bukhari
"Now then, I am going to tell you something which (Allah) has written for me to say. I do not know; perhaps it portends my death, so whoever understands and remembers it, must narrate it to the others wherever his mount takes him, but if somebody is afraid that he does not understand it, then it is unlawful for him to tell lies about me. Allah sent Muhammad with the Truth and revealed the Holy Book to him, and among what Allah revealed, was the Verse of the Rajam (the stoning of married person (male & female) who commits illegal sexual intercourse, and we did recite this Verse and understood and memorized it. Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) did carry out the punishment of stoning and so did we after him. I am afraid that after a long time has passed, somebody will say, 'By Allah, we do not find the Verse of the Rajam in Allah's Book,' and thus they will go astray by leaving an obligation which Allah has revealed." (Sahih al-Bukhari 6830)
Or:
"'A'isha (Allah be pleased with, her) reported that it had been revealed in the Holy Qur'an that ten clear sucklings make the marriage unlawful, then it was abrogated (and substituted) by five sucklings and Allah's Apostle (ﷺ) died and it was before that time (found) in the Holy Qur'an (and recited by the Muslims)." Sahih Muslim 1452a
2:18 Please mention the actions of Hzt Saad ibn Ubadah here as well
♥️ Love ♥️ you ♥️ so ♥️ much ♥️ brother ♥️ Fareed ♥️ may ♥️ Allah ♥️ SWT ♥️ bless ♥️ the ♥️ DawahWise ♥️ team ♥️ Ameen ♥️
Farid, your bookshelf is about to explode
May Allah reward your parents
This channel was very important for me during my formative years as a teenager
May Allah preserve and protect you my brother Farid
Your straight-forward, well mannered and sometimes sarcastic methods appealed to me
Now I have more grey hairs than you haha
Yet they forget about Abu Bakr ibn Ali ibn Abi Talib (R.A)
You are right, although Abu Bakr is a title.
Farid Please make a playlist refuting Hisham Al Masry. Please you're the only one that can refute and put him in place. I'd appreciate if you tackle his arguments. Much love akhi and May Allah bless you!
Great video. Simply explained. Always tough on the deniers of the truth. We ask Allah to guide us all and the misguided amongst the Shi'a who are upon another religion, not islam that's for sure.
Keep up the good work, cool, calm and collected always the best approach to dawah to the Deen of Allah, Al Islam.
Can you recommend some Books on Aqeedah in English?
al-Aqeedah al-Wasitiyyah
Sharh as-Sunnah
Usool as-Sunnah
Al-Aqeedah al-Tahawiyah explained by Shaykh Salih al-Fawzan
Aqidah Al-Wasitiyyah by Shaykh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah with commentary by Shaykh Uthaymeen may Allāh be pleased with them.
But if this is a bit too large, read Kitab at Tawhid by Shaykh Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahāb, May Allāh have mercy on him.
There are others like Usool Al-Thalathah as well.
My advise is that to learn about Aqidah but to not neglect the recitation and understanding of the the Qur’aan. The Qur’aan supersedes any other writing of knowledge, Allāh’s revelation has too much wisdom to be ignored.
Salafis will misguide you by advising you to read Wasitiyyah or commentaries by Salafis.
Just read the standard aqida book of Muslims WITHOUT any commentary - aqida tahawiyyah.
8 book series on Aqeedah by Dr Umar Sulaymaan Al Ashqar
Guide to sound creed by Dr Salih Al Fawzaan rahimahullah
Never ask a sunni about battle of Jamal 😂
People asked so I gave a lecture about it.
th-cam.com/video/bbpf_VANFAI/w-d-xo.html
Wish we never split
WaAlaikum Assalam! May Allah bless you
جزاك الله خيرا
SHAIS CAN NEVER PROVE TO FOLLOW AHLE BAIT FROM QURAN
THOUGH WE LOVE THEM
BUT STILL NO PROFF RATHER QURAN EMPHASISES THE FOLLOWING OF SAHABA
❤️💯
Nice ma sha'a Allah Allahumma barik lak ameen
It's really true when one thinks about it, aws and khazraj could've just said that they're on their territory now but they didn't, also if they all knew about Rasoolu Allah salla Allahu alayhi wa sallam appointing Ali radiya Allahu anh (and mind you, news spread fast and it would be before his death), then everyone would speak up, but they didn't
Bro what's wrong with the book shelves behind you💀
JazakAllah khair
*_The will of Allah prevailed as Abu Bakr (R A) proclaimed as the first Caliph._*
Never ask a shia complete lineage of imam jafar sadiq,
It reaches back to Abu bakr 💀💀💀
It reaches to his son, Muhammad Ibn Abu Bakr. And you should know he fought against his sister, Aisha, at the battle of Jamal. And your bloodline has nothing to do with whether you are righteous or not.
@@thatshiairaqi9886 So it reaches back to Abu Bakr then 😂. Btw, do you think Muhammad ibn Abu Bakr would approve of swine cursing his sister as a disbeliever, despite their own disagreements? 🤡
@@thatshiairaqi9886 Your bloodline has nothing to do with whether you are righteous or not? I wonder why some shias hold descendants of Muhammad s.a.w centuries or even millenia after to a higher degree.
@@thatshiairaqi9886 wrong, jamal wasn't against Ali ibn Abi talib, rather khawarij in army of Ali...
You are dumb and stupid, ever wondered what happened with spoils of war of jamal?
Their were no spoils because their was no war...
@@thatshiairaqi9886
Seems like you’ve forgotten whom Asma bint Abdur Rehman ibn Abi Bakr. Don’t forget the grandfather of Fatima bint Hasan, the grandmother of Imam Ja’far. That was Talha Ibn Ubaydullah عليه السلام , the father in law of Hasnayn عليهم السلام. Or the Husband of Umm Kulthum رضي الله عنه , Umar عليه السلام. Just looking at the marriages b/w the Sahaba and Ahlulbayt is problematic for you guys, majority of Shi’a don’t even have the slightest idea that Imam Ja’far(& all after him) are descendants of Abu Bakr(twice) and Talha عليہم السلام جمعا
Brother Farid can i please ask you some questions i am really having tough times with doubts in islam.I am muslim but i want to clearify somethings can you plz take few minutes to answer my questions i will be really gratefull.PLEASE
الله يهديك آمين
Kinda unrelated but I don't know why Ali (r.a.) appointed Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr as governor of Egypt when he had an active role in the siege of Uthman's house
Because in reality there were lots of conflicts between the remaining parties at the time. Shia make it out as if everyone was against Ali and demonic for doing so, and Sunnis make it out as if Aisha, Uthman, Ali, Umar, Abu Bakr, Fatima, and all were happy as clams. The fact is Fatima had disagreements with the other caliphs. Aisha had disagreements with Ali, all of them disagreed about some moves or decisions the others made (that is natural in any politics by the way). And so Ali may have made this choice thinking he was doing something right but the opinion of the people was against it. That was not uncommon in the time after the Prophet.
As salamu alaikum Brother Farid, be careful with your bookshelf brother we dont want you to get hurt. Reminds me of the story of Al Jahiz, Allah protect us.
The issue is they believe the sahabah apostated. The main argument should be whose sources are authentic or fabricated. The rest will fall in place after that
That's really simple. In shia sources, imams used to do taqiyyah in minor issues and agree to sunnis in every single matter. That proves that imams were sunnis and shia whenever they see the imams giving verdict in support of sunnis, they made th excuse that imams did taqiyyah. But they were caught red handed when they were ascribing that imams did taqiyyah in even minor issues.
Read hadith in sahih Bukhari,
Prophet SAW Prophecized abu Bakr becoming Caliph. Prophet SAW said "Allah swt will insist on abu bakr becoming caliph.."
I need source
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 your a weirdo, did you know that?
@@LeafSoulsProphet Muhammad SAW Prophecized Abu bakr becoming a Caliph
Chapter: The appointment of a caliph
The Prophet said, "But I should say, 'O my head!' I feel like calling Abu Bakr and his son and appoint (the former as my successors lest people should say something or wish for something. Allah will insist (on Abu Bakr becoming a Caliph) and the believers will prevent (anyone else from claiming the Caliphate)," or "..Allah will prevent (anyone else from claiming the Caliphate) and the believers will insist (on Abu Bakr becoming the Caliph).- Sahih Bukhari 7217
@@filmyfun1 thanks 👍
Though Ali (rta) was a great warrior and sahabi and the Prophet (saww) loved him . Muslims respect him, but t here is no comparison between Abu Bakr (rta) and Ali (rta).
It was obvious to the Muslims that AbuBakr (rta ) was the obvious choice as was in the case of Umar (rta), finally a committee of senior Sahaba selected Utjman (rta), not Ali (rta).
The Shia live on some other planet and use Ali (rta) and his ahle bayt and progeny for their schism
How is Abu Bakr greater than Ali (a)? Your own books say Ali was the first Muslim and first to pray.
@@thatshiairaqi9886Ali (ra) himself said Abu Bakr (ra) was greater than him. Or did Ali (ra) lie?
@@thatshiairaqi9886
Our books say Abu bakr ra is greater lol
Farid you ended the stream so abruptly
A question shia's claim that prophet quoted 33:6 at ghadeer and this means authority so mawla means authority what are your thoughts?
nothing but nonsense
@@TommyGok can you elaborate bro or refer to a refutation video or article?
I’m uploading my answer soon
ghadirkhumm.com/meaning-of-mawla/
@@FaridResponds so what do we do with the reports that state that the prophet saww quotes 33:6?
What blows my mind is all this happened whilst Rasullah wasn't buried so doesn't mean the Caliphate was the most pressing issue?
Where's the morals and nobility Rasullah came to perfect.
Imagine someone already asking about inheritance before burying the dead. We all know this title was a worldly attachment and since we got the starting wrong, good luck to us all...
You shia are funny lol
The title of caliph is both religious and spiritual.
Imam Ali (a) stayed with the Messenger of Allah and washed his body and did everything while some of the companions were at saqifa.
@@karimmezghiche9921 jokes on you... I'm Sunni but to conceal is to oppress
@@marylasusa5970
A Sunni who spreads Shia lies?
Yeah I totally believe you 😂😂
Nice taqiyya
Ali vs abu bakr....who should have been the first khalifa of Prophet muhammad SAW???
My dear sunni bros for the love of Allah, Prophet SAW had already decided that matter for us 2 years before his death & we must submit to that as true muslims.
Muhammad (SAW) said directly to Ali (AS) in many SAHIH AHADITH: "YOU ARE MY KHALIFA OVER EVERY BELIEVER AFTER ME."
The prophet couldnt have been more explicit than this.
May Allah guide these sunnis to the haq.
Did u not watch this video when the prophet saw said that there were people in attendance yet when Abu bakr went to become the khalifa why did they submit to Abu bakr if the prophet saw genuinely meant that Ali Ra should be khalifa? Bear in mind they are more knowledgeable then us all
@nbw_v3nom195 LOL....firstly, do u care about the TRUTH???
Secondly, did u read my comment carefully?!! Had u done it, u wouldn't have missed the crucial point.
Let me repeat that CRUCIAL POINT again. U can NEVER be a TRUE MUSLIM unless u SUBMIT to the prophet (SAW) & take him as HUJJAH (authority) in everything.
Lastly, there is NO place for logic in islam when we have TEXTUAL PROOF available.
May Allah guide u to the truth, which im upon.
Ali vs Abu bakr….who should have been the first Khalifa of prophet Muhammad ﷺ??
This was answered by Muhammed ﷺ before his passing in Sahih Muslim 2387: A'isha reported that Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) in his (last) illness asked me to call Abu Bakr, her father, and her brother too, so that he might write a document, for he feared that someone else might be desirous (of succeeding him) and that some claimant may say:
“I have better claim to it” whereas Allah and the Faithful do not substantiate the claim of anyone but that of Abu Bakr.
So by giving Bay'ah to Abu Bakr, not only did Ali go Against the Prophet but also against Allah?
Yeah that makes a lot of sense!
@SuperGulamali Imam Ali giving bayah to abu bakr?? LOL
Food for thought: Would u give bayah to someone if u considered him to be a LIAR & TRAITOR?? I doubt! :)
Ur another victim of distorted history! :(
Asalam o Alaikum brother, I watched a video of exmuslim and he said that Akbar in Allah Hu Akbar means larger, Apuss also had a video about this
Can you help me understand this meaning
@BilalYousef-qy7dz got it brother
Why did the ansar gather right after the prophets death to choose a caliph and they didnt even invite abu bakr even though he is supposedly the best of the companions. You also talk about saqifa if it was a real election even though there where only 3 muhajirun present and they even started to fight with the ansar (Tarikh al Tabari volume 9 page 194 in the english version)? And here comes the best part: "The Ansar said, or some of them said, "We will not give the oath of allegiance [to anyone] except 'Ali.""(Tarikh al Tabari volume 9 page 186 in the english version)
They even wanted to elect two caliphs one for the muhajirun and one from the ansar. "Let us have a ruler from us and another from you, O men of Quraysh" (Tarikh al Tabari volume 9 page 194 in the english version). So yes saqifa was a very sincere election
Because they accept Hadith about ruler must be from Quraish
Can you respond to Yadir Qadhis kufri Statement of "Jews are the true followers of Moses"? JzkAllah khair
No need, the Quran explicitly refutes him. Surah Al’i Imran 68: إِنَّ أَوْلَى ٱلنَّاسِ بِإِبْرَٰهِيمَ لَلَّذِينَ ٱتَّبَعُوهُ وَهَـٰذَا ٱلنَّبِىُّ وَٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوا۟ ۗ
(Indeed, those who have the best claim to Abraham are his followers, this Prophet, and the believers.)
Jake the muslil metapasition did a vid on that. Give it a look
Moreover, Allah literally says in the Quran that Ansar are promised Jannah. In Surah Tawbah verse 100 (Quran 9:100):
وَٱلسَّـٰبِقُونَ ٱلْأَوَّلُونَ مِنَ ٱلْمُهَـٰجِرِينَ *وَٱلْأَنصَارِ* وَٱلَّذِينَ ٱتَّبَعُوهُم بِإِحْسَـٰنٍۢ رَّضِىَ ٱللَّهُ عَنْهُمْ وَرَضُوا۟ عَنْهُ وَأَعَدَّ لَهُمْ جَنَّـٰتٍۢ تَجْرِى تَحْتَهَا ٱلْأَنْهَـٰرُ خَـٰلِدِينَ فِيهَآ أَبَدًۭا ۚ ذَٰلِكَ ٱلْفَوْزُ ٱلْعَظِيمُ ١٠٠
As for the foremost-the first of the Emigrants (Muhajireen) and the Helpers *(Ansar)*-and those who follow them in goodness, Allah is pleased with them and they are pleased with Him. And He has prepared for them Gardens under which rivers flow, to stay there for ever and ever. That is the ultimate triumph.
Neither you nor your scholars understand this verse. If you read it in Arabic, it clearly says (مِنَ ٱلْمُهَـٰجِرِينَ وَٱلْأَنصَارِ)
The verse clearly states ‘from AMONG the Muhajirin and Ansar Allah is pleased with them and they are pleased with Him.’
@@thatshiairaqi9886You know more than scholars. Gotcha.
@@thatshiairaqi9886Quiet down you ignorant. When Allah said وَنُنَزِّلُ مِنَ ٱلْقُرْءَانِ مَا هُوَ شِفَآءٌۭ وَرَحْمَةٌۭ لِّلْمُؤْمِنِينَ ۙ
(we reveal “MINAL” Quran as a healing and mercy for the believers)
Now tell me o’ knowledgeable one, does this mean that Allah only revealed some of the Quran because he used the word من?
@@thatshiairaqi9886
1. The next verse pointed out who are the exceptions and hypocrites. It doesn't mention muhajiroon from whom is Abu Bakr (ra).
2. Surah anfal at the end mentions those who gave shelter and aid to the muhajiroon (ie ansar) are almuminoon alhaqq. There is no "among".
You have been refuted by Quran.
CHECK for yourself, Whether the previous Religion of ALI was the ZOROASTRIAN Avestan religion? before he accepted the Quran.
Why did his sons marry MAGI women from Persia?????
The Prophet said to the sahaba that you will follow in the footsteps of the jews and the christians.
He (SAW) meant the Ummah as a whole, as we see today. But go on, skip over all the accounts of how the Prophet (SAW) praised and honored the Sahaba.
@@shahidabdoullakhanzorovr1564 Sunan Tirmirzi 2180. The Sahaba Asked the prophet for an Idol just as the companions of Musa A.S asked him for one. If this Hadeeth applies to anyone it is the sahaba.
Why do you ignore so many ahadeeth like this for example Hadeeth Hauz Bukhari 7049.
@@Aoun-HussainIt wasn’t an idol you liar. The words Dhaat Anwaat: Anwaat is the plural of the word nawt, which refers to anything that is hung up. Dhaat Anwaat is the tree on which these things were hung. You Shias cannot refrain from lying even for a second.
@@Aoun-Hussain lol why you ignore the Quran which praises them?
@@cowdyayaad6378 No we accept that the Quran does praise the good ones and so do we and where the quran condems the bad ones so do we
The channel isnt displaying my replies to 2 other guys. What a shame!
There’s no conspiracy.
👍👍
☝🏽
Bro what's wrong with the book shelves behind you
The ones right behind me are Shia books and they seem to be plotting to destroy my furniture.
@@FaridResponds😂😂😂
first
Would you or anyone explain why three khalifa was killed by fellow Muslims (not madmen) on top of that why Aisha attacked Ali or may I say why the battle of Camel took place. Was it all power struggle? If not where is the divinity? Politics? If not then when did political Islam took shape? Anyone?
Umar ra wasn't killed by a Muslim.
Farid has a whole lecture. Instead of being lazy go watch.
@@cowdyayaad6378 Since you watch those, please give me the link. Why should I watch every single video?
Ghadir Khumn was about solving the dispute between Ali (ra) and some Yemenis.
Doesn’t make sense tho. Why would the Prophet SAW feel the need to announce to thousands and thousands of companions that "whomever I am his maula, Ali is his maula"? When you say Yemenis what do you mean? Cuz Ghadir is not in Yemen, Ghadir is between Mecca and Medinah. Some ppl say it’s cuz of a dispute between Ali and Khalid ibn Walid, but then why would the Prophet SAW not include Khalid when mentioning the famous line. Use logic, three months before the Prophet SAW passes away, he appoints his successor, whether people want to challenge on the linguistics of maula is up to them. End of the day, you’re are someone who believes Abu Bakr could appoint his successor on his deathbed but the Prophet SAW failed to make it clear to his ummah who his successor would be, that’s your narrative not mine.
Ghadir Kum was a gathering for Khutba. And there Prophet a.s was showing to musliks that Ali should be their FRIEND/MALWA,after a dispute some soldiers had with Ali
@@A.A471use your logic. Why Prophet a.s didnt appoint Ali during Hajj when all muslims were present?!
@@iMan-610 so you are questioning whether the Prophet SAW appointed a successor just because he chose to not do it in hajj. Who are you to say where the prophet SAW appoints his successor. If the Prophet SAW wanted to make a last khutba that he tells us many things amongst Ali being the master of the believers, why didn’t he just do it in hajj ? You see there is a clear reason for why the prophet SAW waited to do it after hajj. For you to come and say that is stupid, because your questioning the prophet SAW over something that is a necessity in religion- successorship, Quran proves why the Prophet SAW has to appoint Ali as his successor in 13:7.
@@A.A471
You actually refuted shia argument since according to them Prophet (saws) must have appointed Ali (ra) there because it was such a big event and why would he not do something as big as appointing caliph in a big event? But you admitted final hajj was bigger and bigness has no relevance.
You misinterpret 13:7.
"Don't be sad. Indeed Allah is with us" words which are so terrifying to shias that one shia to whom I mentioned these words started debating the bible out of nowhere just to run away from this topic lol.
Look there is no who is better between companions you know which company are higher in rank the first four Khalifa are the highest in the in rank Hazrat Hasan being the fifth Khalifa does not make him the fifth in Rank between companions it is some other companion I think it was the Ashraf mubashirin are the companions that are the best after the Khalifa and then the companions that took by a pledge to the prophet in the tree that they will take the Revenge of Hazrat Uthman even if it means they will die obviously the Qureshi had captured Hazrat Uthman show the companions and the prophet thought that he was killed this is the correct tarkeeb
Abu Bakr (ra) and Umar (ra) were the best, then possibly Uthman (ra), then everyone else. That's what Ali (ra) said 🙂.
@@shahidabdoullakhanzorovr1564 Look there is no who is better between companions you know which company are higher in rank the first four Khalifa are the highest in the in rank Hazrat Hasan being the fifth Khalifa does not make him the fifth in Rank between companions it is some other companion I think it was the Ashraf mubashirin are the companions that are the best after the Khalifa and then the companions that took by a pledge to the prophet in the tree that they will take the Revenge of Hazrat Uthman even if it means they will die obviously the Qureshi had captured Hazrat Uthman show the companions and the prophet thought that he was killed this is the correct tarkeeb
Weak Analysis
Never ask a Sunni about who was responsible for the death of thousands of Muslims at The Battle Of Jamal
I have a lecture on it.
@@FaridResponds Let me guess Abdullah Ibn Saba was responsible?
@@Ismael2019popyes and his followers which ali knew which is why he escorted aisha ra back to medina with his daughters ☠️
@@Ismael2019popOt was the khawarij.
Khwarij
Seems like the Ansar got shafted in the whole political process. Unfortunate.
I’ve never heard of an election take place where 90% of the electorate aren’t there. The prophet was also being buried by ali when Abu bakr and Umar Ra were rushing to saqifa
Nonetheless the best leader and Successor to the prophet pbuh was clear
In terms of closeness to the prophet there were none closer to him than Ali
In terms of bravery and loyalty that was shown uhud where most of the sahaba ran away but he stayed
In terms of knowledge same thing again
Typical shiee narrative.
The entire community pledged aligeance to Abu Bakr after Saqifa, including Ali.
So they elected him
@@karimmezghiche9921 keyword after😭, let’s use our brains the “election” already took place , ali and co never had a say in it
@@Shah_husain objective narrative unless I said something wrong then feel free to correct me
@@Hamzathefirst
No, in Saqifa Abu Bakr was elected by the Ansar and Umar.
Afterwards he was elected by the rest of the community including Ali.
"Ali could never had a say in it"
The Imam who was appointed by God couldn't say anything as Islam and his divine right to rule were being taken over by hypocrites like Abu Bakr and Umar??
See where you Shia logic leads you?
Sunni believe that the umma was left to go astray after the death of the prophet to a point where they believe that aisha , a woman, was left with the burden of fatwa 😅😅😅 for men in their intimate issues 😅😅😅
Bro what 💀
@@battekyake6107
It's documented in bukahri and sahih muslim !! She used to teach men all sort of stuff !! 😅😅😅
And shia believes in 12 infallible imams and the last one doesn't even exist.
Just go worship ali
@@tryemc3026 what's ridiculous is shias go so far to defame a person whom Allah protected her honour by revealing a surah in the divine Quran. Curse on you just as those slanderers were cursed.
@@cowdyayaad6378
Unless that sura says she is inflatable, you have no case. Teaching men occurred after the death of your prophet
on the contrary you do have evidence as the victors controlling the narrative by who you perceive as the best after the prophet and in which order. subhan allah its the order of the not appointed khalifs and theres 'authentic' hadeeths to back there supposed superiority up and in the exact order as they ruled. we see clearly though whose virtues are unrivaled when the prophet was actually alive and events were unfolding in real time and no sincere historian can argue otherwise to who allah and his messenger showed was the actual superior one