Calculus - Working with position, velocity, and acceleration

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 55

  • @lordmenkind5296
    @lordmenkind5296 8 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    Just a compliment: Your voice is very teacher like, it's very easy going and makes you feel relaxed when you're learning!
    Thanks for the video !! :D

  • @hanatekle
    @hanatekle 9 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    funny how it took this one vid to clear upmost of the things i been struggling trough in calc...thanks so much

  • @rubietues
    @rubietues 9 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    thank you so much. calculus has already cause 2 of my mental breakdowns.. missed one class due to some unforseen things, of course which they covered all this stuff that day - came back the next day and was completely blindsided. you explained this very well and clearly... thank you much ;)

  • @wyattramos4786
    @wyattramos4786 7 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    for those who were confused at 3:52 , the 4 isn't negative because you cant have negative time.

  • @howled0
    @howled0 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It is 6 in the morning having a mental breakdown over this subject, but this video just made everything so. damn. clear. even with my brain fog. Thank you once again.

  • @anonymousotter6455
    @anonymousotter6455 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    My teacher didn't explain everything, but this video makes it all super clear! Thanks!

  • @tabathadalponte409
    @tabathadalponte409 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    You just saved my calc grade.. missed a few days n have a test tomorrow. Thanks

  • @celsiusfahrenheit1176
    @celsiusfahrenheit1176 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    For the distance traveled I get 52 when taking the definite integral of the velocity for x=0 to 4, oh never mind, I forgot to wrap the function with an absolute value function, it's all good, thx!!!

  • @kekevillo1
    @kekevillo1 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    out of all the videos i watched today .. he made sense ! thank you

  • @ileiniofahengaue6821
    @ileiniofahengaue6821 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This helped so much. Thank you !

  • @shivangsrivastava8700
    @shivangsrivastava8700 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    informative!
    but you may simply want to confirm reversal of direction by ensuring double derivate of displacement fn as non zero, instead of cross checking in the disp prime fn.

  • @vladimircastanon9682
    @vladimircastanon9682 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Incredibly helpful video, thank you!

  • @kaitsune00
    @kaitsune00 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much! I didn't know about ways you could test if the velocity was positive or negative

  • @Lexyvil
    @Lexyvil 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great lesson!
    Also, why is position labeled as 's' instead of 'x'?
    Beautiful and clear handwriting by the way~ Helps memorize.

  • @lluvik2450
    @lluvik2450 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Where can i find examples like these to practice?

  • @rkumaresh
    @rkumaresh 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Simple and easily understandable.

  • @lluvik2450
    @lluvik2450 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Question: is the v(t) equal to the derrivitive of s(t) because v = the slope of s in the movement graphs? Im asking this because I know that when you get the derrivitive of something you are working out a function to work out the slope of the graph

  • @qienlin4766
    @qienlin4766 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for the great content. You really helped me a lot! THANK YOUUUUU!!!!

  • @swiftgoobie
    @swiftgoobie 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks, I needed help with physics and this really helped.

  • @wilhelmlouisfriedrichvongo8310
    @wilhelmlouisfriedrichvongo8310 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    if it were 'displacement', then it would be 52m for the last question, since from 3s to 4s it travels -2m.

  • @huiyenlo2461
    @huiyenlo2461 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the lesson!

  • @abenafrimpomaa5879
    @abenafrimpomaa5879 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    God bless u dear.i love it

  • @saintseer8214
    @saintseer8214 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    if this was the position of particle has it already stopped?

  • @Moises-Devzz
    @Moises-Devzz 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love your videos!!!

  • @JoseRivera-uj8km
    @JoseRivera-uj8km 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great Video. 👍

  • @chandarani710
    @chandarani710 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sir how you get 0=6t-24

  • @stebinalex1395
    @stebinalex1395 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    very helpful, thanks

  • @ronaldwashington6156
    @ronaldwashington6156 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you so much, i loved how you explained that :)

  • @armandotorres2283
    @armandotorres2283 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    this is a great example but I find like the marker some of the numbers look like something else other than the number youre writing

  • @veronicawicker5273
    @veronicawicker5273 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    I need to solve a word problem that doesn't give me an equation. How do I write one from speed and acceleration given?

  • @hishamhashim3603
    @hishamhashim3603 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you

  • @saadalabdali9982
    @saadalabdali9982 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    tanks that was helpful

  • @r_00_ng
    @r_00_ng 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this kinematics

  • @akm2000poler
    @akm2000poler 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank U so much 😍😍😍

  • @anastasiaanautodidact9856
    @anastasiaanautodidact9856 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's pretty fun & understandable but I have trouble putting my hand on how on earth a derivative turns into another function graphically. I mean, isn't a derivative basically the slope of two points approaching each other almost becoming one? Till we get the rise/run of just one point or the slope of the tangent?
    How do I derive one point then???
    I expect the answer: because it turns into another function.
    But speaking in a realistic manner, how does that happen & why?
    It just magically turns into acceleration/time? With totally different points on the graph?????
    Isn't acceleration just d/t/t ?
    How can it be "derived" from sth else?

    • @MySecretMathTutor
      @MySecretMathTutor  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The derivative of a function can evaluated at a single point, or you there are times you can evaluate it at all points.
      It is this later example that allows us to graph a brand new derivative function from the original.
      You can think of these as two different graphs with different information. (But still related)
      Graph 1 can give you say distance
      Graph 2 can give you speed

  • @louisemarienietes943
    @louisemarienietes943 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where did t raised to 3 minus 12 t raised to 2 plus 45 t came from?

    • @ZOMBLAYR
      @ZOMBLAYR 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Louise Marie Nietes the derivative

  • @haimantighosh1236
    @haimantighosh1236 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome

  • @xrisku
    @xrisku 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I know too many THIRD DERIVATIVES. I just laughed.

  • @louisemarienietes943
    @louisemarienietes943 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now I know where it came from

  • @TheDailyViralMemeChannel
    @TheDailyViralMemeChannel 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    When you are calculating distance direction doesn't matter you don't have to use velocity to find total distance. You could have just plugged it into the distance formula and added them up as the answer still would've been 56m.

    • @fcar851
      @fcar851 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      NO Aksh......if you plug 4 into the Distance Equation you get 52..not 56 This Tutorial is CORRECT ! ..Another way is to Integrate the ABSOLUTE VALUE of the Velocity Equation over interval 0 to 4 ...and you will also get 56Prof FCC..Oct 2017

  • @芒果牛奶-r3d
    @芒果牛奶-r3d 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    this is clear and succint! fxck I love it❤❤❤

  • @harsimratdhaliwal2806
    @harsimratdhaliwal2806 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    goat talk

  • @777DAvidandrew
    @777DAvidandrew 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    wait. Your (v)=0 at 3 and 5 don't you need to figure out the distance traveled between 4 and 5 not 3 and 4.

    • @hz9880
      @hz9880 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      agreed..

    • @111Gtfo
      @111Gtfo 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      no?
      because it's asking for the total distance traveled from x=0 to x=4

  • @ambujpatelmusic9448
    @ambujpatelmusic9448 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    such a long video only for this 😔

  • @jeetenderkakkar7570
    @jeetenderkakkar7570 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Beggat