Dvaita Vs Advaita; Dualism And Non-Dualism [The 2 Schools of Vedanta]

แชร์
ฝัง

ความคิดเห็น • 169

  • @adhvaitha
    @adhvaitha  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    HIT LIKE & SUBSCRIBE 🙂
    Namaste.
    We value all the traditions and philosophies of the ancient Sanatana Dharma. This video is not intended to disrespect any tradition or philosophy, but is only to give the perspective of Advaita Vedanta on how it sees reality. Personally, I believe these different philosophies are different models of reality which help us understand the complex nature of this existence from different perspectives.
    That being said, we will not be able to address all the comments and questions raised by everyone here. So, for those of you who wish to go deeper to understand the non-dualistic perspective of Advaita Vedanta on how it explains reality, we are attaching some links here. This will help.
    Understanding Advaita: advaita-vedanta.in/adi-shankara-preached-smarta-dharma
    Advaita in the Shastras: www.advaita-vedanta.in/advaita-in-shastras
    Objections on Advaita, Answered: www.advaita-vedanta.in/dispelling-doubts
    ------------------------------
    And Some of you have also suggested we look at the 'Dvaita' philosophy in greater depth to understand it more clearly. We request you to point us toward some resources and readings which may help us in this.
    Thank you.

    • @rdpakr
      @rdpakr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Advaitha is a great treatise but is insufficient in explaining the Upanishads, as it caters only to Abedha shruthi that is effective in describing the pralaya kaal, when all subside into the One.
      There is also Bedha shruthi in Upanishads that clearly describes various beautiful qualifies of the Paramaatma - i.e., Saguna Brahman and makes the case for such Brahman to be the causal entity of the multiverse and the Aatmas, when the creation process unfolds.
      Finally, there is Gataka shruthi, that reconciles the two and that’s what Sri Ramanujacharya leverages to beautifully explain Vishishtadvaitha, that says the Paramaatma can be both Nirguna and Saguna Brahman, as He is capable of assuming no and any form simultaneously. Jeevatma (Chith) and Matter (Achith) then, though distinct entities, are inseparable from the Ishwar, as He embodies ALL, by being both their substrate at the quantum and cosmic levels simultaneously.

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rdpakr Adhvaitha Vedanta by itself is a complete philosophy. It is not insufficient in explaining the Upanishads. Adhvaitha Vedanta gives it's own interpretation and explanations on what we call bedha shruthis, abedha shruthis and ghataka shruthis. But it considers 'Abedha Shruthis' as most important pointers on the nature of reality. Adhvaitha acknowledges the apparent duality and bedha at the level of body-mind and it also accepts the existence of "Saguna-Brahman" within the Manifested Universe.

  • @sivalogasivam1116
    @sivalogasivam1116 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Really worthy and very clear to understand. Keep going..
    Thank you so much❤

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you 🙂🙏

  • @royprotocol
    @royprotocol 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Very insightful video. Keep up the good work! Jai Shree Krishna🙏

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you 🙂🙏

  • @HemantKale
    @HemantKale 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Some of thel Dvaita Gurus are following.
    Shri Ramanujacharya, Shri Madhvacharya, Shri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, Tyagaraja, Thiruvallur, Sant Tukaram Maharaj, Sant Dnyaneshwar, Sant Eknath, Sant Namdeo, Tulsidas, Surdas, Meerabai, Ravidas, Andal, Guru Nanak Ji,
    Great Teachings by them. They really saved us from all Confused understanding and provided easy and simple way to attain Supreme by simply doing Bhakti.

  • @harishchitragar8106
    @harishchitragar8106 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    What we suggest is before coming to conclusion it is better to discuss with the scholars or any Guru or yati of Dhvaita sidhanta, as the adhvait followers Sri Trivikramapanditacharya and Sri Narayanapanditachrya' have surrendered to Sri Madhwachaya and accepted the Dhvaita Sidhant.

  • @jamesjoseph9998
    @jamesjoseph9998 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    DO NOT HEAR BY THE INTELLECT. HEAR BY THE HEART AND SEE HOW THESE HELP TO DESTROY THE EGO AND ACHIEVE ENLIGHTENMENT... SALUTE.❤❤

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      🙏🙂

  • @praveengwin
    @praveengwin 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Thank you. It is a good start for beginners on Advaita philosophy. However, I believe that the points brought for dvaita philosophy was just your perspective. It's not the best interpretation. Also that we are too less educated to make such a huge quick judgement on the dvaita school of thought. Please don't add your view point as a right way to understand these things, as other beginner's can keep wrong conclusions!!!! + Not just Advaita but every school of thought in Hindu culture asks the followers to introspect their paths and not to blindly accept it.

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      🙂🙏

  • @ramasatyanarayan9887
    @ramasatyanarayan9887 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Very interestingly narrated. Thanks 🙏

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you 🙏

  • @mitchmann5600
    @mitchmann5600 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thank you ♥ I just want to know where can I buy Bhagavad Gita for Advaita Vendanta and other classic books the only one which can be easy to get is from Hari Krishna

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Im Reading 'Holy Geeta' by Swamy Chinmayananda. Its available on Amazon.

    • @DCM88
      @DCM88 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Abhinavagupta commentary on the Bhagavad Gita.

    • @munnangivenkateswarareddy2855
      @munnangivenkateswarareddy2855 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Please read Ranganathananda's Bhagavadgita of Ramakrishna Mission .it is in three volumes.In fafact they are lectures delivered by him in English.
      If you are a Telugu read Bhagavadgita- Shankarabhasyam by. Pullela sriramachandrudu.
      If you want in samskit
      Read Bhasyarka prakashika by Bellamkonda Ramaraya kavi. ( Translation available in Telugu.
      Search Google for purchase.

    • @munnangivenkateswarareddy2855
      @munnangivenkateswarareddy2855 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Abhinava gupta is a proponent of kashmir saivisam.

  • @vijayhandoo6126
    @vijayhandoo6126 หลายเดือนก่อน

    To understand , go to Kashmir TANTRA , which is the convergence & synergy of Advita & Duwita . Adi Shankra , Ramanuja etc. all flocked to KASHMIR for ultimate Gyan & realisation of ultimate TRUTH. 🎉

  • @mohitvijayan2758
    @mohitvijayan2758 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That was so beautiful explained! Understood each & every word from it...super concise & to the point. Really captures the essence of it all. Tatvam asi ❤ Love u bro!

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'm glad you liked the content. 🙂🙏

  • @docsudipta
    @docsudipta 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Appreciate your efforts 🎉. But there are several questions arising today that non dualism is derived from Buddhism!!!! Some are telling Nagarjuna's philosophy is responsible for creations of nondualistic thoughts!!! etc...
    Plz try to put on light on this thing to break some misconceptions which some fellow have today.
    Try to make a profound video on theology in Buddhism and advdyta. A comparative study.
    Thank you.
    God bless you 🙏

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I have not studied Buddhism. But Swami Vivekananda once said 'Buddhism is the fulfillment of Hinduism'. So Buddhism is a derivative of Hinduism, not the other way round.
      Just think about it, What Adhvaitha Vedanta is telling us is simply the teachings of Upanishads and Upanishads existed 1000s of years before Buddha.
      Thank you 🙂

    • @kawalangdalawahan
      @kawalangdalawahan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why does it matter if it came from Buddhism or not? They all show the truth and They are all beautiful religions from the greatest civilization that is Bharat

  • @narayanansundram
    @narayanansundram 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wonderful explanation. ❤
    Keep up your good work.
    Please explain Vishishtadvaita in simple terms.

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you 🙂🙏

  • @rationalityrules111
    @rationalityrules111 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    15:15 not really, that is the case even with Dvaitha Vedanta, it surely utilizes Nyaya
    just another non-dualist deluded in supremacy of their own worldview

  • @shubhangisinha5100
    @shubhangisinha5100 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you 🙏 very nicely interpreted

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're very welcome :)

    • @shubhangisinha5100
      @shubhangisinha5100 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@adhvaitha 😇😊

  • @sumukhvshankar1652
    @sumukhvshankar1652 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Both are correct. But the absolute is Brahman alone which is advaita.
    One of the names of Bhagavan(Sri Lalita Tripura Sundari) is
    Nirdwaita Dwaita Varjita.
    which literally means Non duel and Dwaita is taken out.
    Another name of Bhagwan is
    Mithya Jagadadhishthana
    Which says Mithya(not actual truth) is the base of the world we see.
    Another name of Bhagavathi Ambal that absolutely establishes that advaita is alone is absolute truth
    The name is
    Brahmatmaikya swaroopini
    Meaning: She is the Brahman which is also the aatma that resides within us.
    Shastras clearly talks only about advaita. One of the greatest guru was ashtavakra, raikva rishi, sanat kumaras, Adi shankaracharya

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for these points.

  • @Jackcamomile
    @Jackcamomile หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm not Indian. Can you tell me why all people are in this illusion called "maya" from the Advaita point of view? After all, the triple suffering exists for everyone, even for those who have good karma. Right? Even some gods in the scriptures regret the presence of these sufferings. Then why does the mighty God torment people with these sufferings? Maybe some mighty rakshasas are causing these sufferings? I read that the text of the Maitrayani Samhita talks about the struggle between dark and light forces. Could you please confirm this?
    And I also want to ask about bhakti yoga. I have heard that in the bhakti movement a person himself can come up with ways to express his feelings towards God. In what scriptures can I find this thought? Probably in some Tamil texts?

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hi, The concept of God is distorted by many. God is simply infinite existence and intelligence which allows for everything to exist. And we are free to make of our lives what we wish

    • @Jackcamomile
      @Jackcamomile หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@adhvaitha Thank you

  • @arjunsarthi8966
    @arjunsarthi8966 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    My humble suggestion to you is please go through the Dvaitha philosophy one more time properly .

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Sure. You can point me toward any particular book/link that you may know.

  • @pyazkachori123
    @pyazkachori123 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Some of the claims are wrong here. Madhvacharya himself was a logician as well. He didnt pull things out of thin air. He argued this philosophy logically only. The same goes with vishishtadvaita.
    Btw, shankara and madhva were not founders of their respective schools. There were strong proponents and arguably the most popular teachers of their respective schools.

    • @govindarajannatesan7013
      @govindarajannatesan7013 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If one accepts everything came from Vishnu's naval and goes back there then ADVAITA only seems logical

    • @jamesjoseph9998
      @jamesjoseph9998 16 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      I was reading certain reviews. By taking a Doctorate, we will not be enlightened. Listen all these not with the intellect, but with the heart. The aim should be how to reach enlightenment. And I respect and salute this person..❤❤❤❤

    • @pyazkachori123
      @pyazkachori123 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@jamesjoseph9998 I disagree. Why can't you listen to anyone with both intellect and heart? You use intellect to understand things and put your heart in it. Jnana and bhakti are equally important. You learn about God with your intellect and worship God with the bhakti using the knowledge you have gained.

  • @venkateshkrishnarajpet3754
    @venkateshkrishnarajpet3754 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Advaita means what?
    As you rightly said , non -duality
    'Ie' there is only one reality which is Brahman which can not be explained by words(sarvashabda avachya) or comprehended by any other pramanas(swaprakasha)
    All the other entities are mithya ie neither real nor unreal and hence inexplicable(anirvachaneeya)
    Then two epistemological questions arise
    1. The only reality Brahman then who is to know HIM?,because all other entities aren't real[ Brahma satya jaganmithya jeevo brahmaiva naaparam]
    2, If Brahman is nitya,mukta,shuddha,buddha then why shastras,why sadhana needs to be exemplified
    Who is really under the spell of AVIDYA?
    if he's jeeva, is he real or mithya?
    He can't be another real entity as a second real entitity comes in(so Adwita haani)
    Then if he's mithya then how can his yet to be achieved mukti be real
    Instead Brahman himself undergoes the spell of AVIDYA and becomes a mithya jeeva then always this can keep on happening and mukti will not be permanent
    These are serious questions that has to be answered

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Very deep questions. I will try to answer.
      1. The Only Reality is Brahman. This is the Truth. Whoever is ignorant of this, can know this and realize this, or not.
      2. Brahman is ever free. But those of us who are in ignorance of this and who are in ignorance of who we are in our essence need shastras, practices, etc., to come out of this ignorance so that we can be free of suffering.
      3. Jeeva is Brahma in essence and he is infinite just like everything else.
      4. Brahman is the infinite potential beyond form, time, space, qualities, etc., And as the infinite potential it also has the potential/power of Avidya/Maya in order to project this reality. But this is just an aspect of Brahman and Brahman does not undergo Avidya, Brahman is beyond this.
      5. Let me put it this way, Every aspect of this existence is Brahman. [Sarvam Kalvidam Brahma - Chandogya Up.]
      The World, The animals, birds, a rock, and so on is Brahman, since in reality only Brahman exists and everything else is simply an appearance. But a rock cannot realize that it is Brahman, and it is infinite. Similarly a bird cannot realize this truth. But we humans can. That's the only difference.

  • @shreyasmoni7798
    @shreyasmoni7798 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Inconclusive, during the introduction of dvaita and Advaita vedanta, he was biased! He is inclined obviously towards Advaita.. there are a lot many gurus get urself know what understand Tatvavaada..
    Panchabheda Taaratamya Jagatsatya

  • @barathvenkatachalam7068
    @barathvenkatachalam7068 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    🙏🙏🙏🙏

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      🙂

  • @vegetarianninja
    @vegetarianninja 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In practice however, most Advaitis reject bhakti and God. Sure Shankara Acharya practiced Bhakti, but the Advaitis today believe that Mandirs and murti are not necessary. Who am I to say they are wrong! But certainly I can say that Mandirs and Murtis, and devotion to the sakar svarup of Bhagwan is a completely beautiful aspect of Sanatana Dharma. It is a great shame that Advaitis have not recognised such.

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Devotion is definitely a part of Advaita Vedanta. Whether it is Adi Shankara, or Ramakrishna Paramahamsa, And the entire lineage of Ramakrishna mission, Chinmaya mission, etc., they teach Advaita along with Bhakti.

  • @apsentertainment847
    @apsentertainment847 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ony Vishishtadwaita is correct.. God is supreme.. there is nothing like him and he can make us part of him too

  • @arjunsarthi8966
    @arjunsarthi8966 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So in my dream , when I am sleeping if I get enlightned and wake up suddenly , it doesn’t bring anything. Then what’s the use of getting enlightened when I am in wake state , and when it’s already an illusion , what does it bring ….

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The Dream is used as an example in Adhvaitha. For example, within the dream let's say you are suffering. Once you wake up from the dream, you transcend the suffering. Similarly, you can transcend this world.

  • @sharanghanvijayakumar4006
    @sharanghanvijayakumar4006 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dvaitha philosophy is the true fact. Not sure why other philosophies even exist.

  • @vedavyasau296
    @vedavyasau296 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Shri Hari is sarvaothama madhva is jeevothama sorry we disturbed you we are dvaita and dvaita is true it takes us directly to the God

    • @govindarajannatesan7013
      @govindarajannatesan7013 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Dvita syas God is absolutely different where is the question of (those who are different} us going directly to Paramatama

  • @haresrinivasa5226
    @haresrinivasa5226 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Vro you should understand tattvavada properly first
    What srimadhacharyaru said
    Paramatma only one
    But have infinity forms
    But adwaita says paramatma is nirguna
    Nirguna means don't have any gunas 😂
    Advaita giving limit to paramatma

  • @nagarajchin9752
    @nagarajchin9752 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    When you are bound with Karma u are supposed to suffer your own That is Dwita , as per u if all are one how come they suffer what u say is for higher realised soul , who are no way concerned to material thing they are awadhoot but not GOD

  • @sudarsanraghavachari3884
    @sudarsanraghavachari3884 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Aditvaita vedantha does not properly explains Brahma sutra of veda vyasa and only Sri Ramanujas Sri Bashyam and have you read the Sapta vidaya Aanupaoatti

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Brahma sutras are brilliantly explained by Shankaracharya. Yes, I have read about the Anupapatti.

  • @SaturnMood
    @SaturnMood 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Advaita teaches that there is Nurguna Brahman, something without qualities
    But how is he then different from a thing that does not exist. Thing that does not exist also has no qualities. So I agree with Ramanuja and Madhva that idea of Nirguna Brahman is bollocks

    • @sumukhvshankar1652
      @sumukhvshankar1652 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Arre read and go to a Sadguru. Don’t spread hate here. When you are in the deepest sleep do you have any qualities? No right but there is bliss

  • @user-hd7dr1og9k
    @user-hd7dr1og9k 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    info is clearly laid out and well presented. but here is food for thought: dvaita is originally called tattva vada - Realism- and explains nature as-is. advaita, the one without a second, relies on a secondary concept of maya to explain the oneness of reality and multiple realities, which by itself is a confusing starting point. to say advaita is the clearest interpretation - if that’s true why there were at least 5 popular schools that opposed advaita so much? surely not Ramanuja, Madhvacharya, Nimbarka, Vallabhacharya, Chaitanya Prabhu were mistaken? i suggest to read Sri Shankara Bhashyam on Vishnu Sahasra Nama in original. People don’t read originals and rely on poorly translated commentaries.

  • @nramesh118
    @nramesh118 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    I think probably anchor is NOT fully aware or know what Dvaita Siddantha is ????? please read , listen & talk to acharyas then post such videos

    • @govindarajannatesan7013
      @govindarajannatesan7013 หลายเดือนก่อน

      i try to hear to Dvita Acharya and end up wondering what have they added to Adi Sankara's teacings Of cource this is not a subject for everyone

  • @ragas_
    @ragas_ หลายเดือนก่อน

    So in summary advaitha says that the world and life is a simulation, and dvaita says the world is real and is made up of matter of different kinds. And yet some feel that some philosophies are “of the future”

  • @haresrinivasa5226
    @haresrinivasa5226 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think he have no knowledge of tattvavada
    Because tattvavada only philosophy in any debate never lose
    Power of tattvavada
    Look at history vro
    Adwaita losing debates everytime

  • @prahladrao4246
    @prahladrao4246 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Actually ...first came the Advaita ...then Vishishtadvaita which corrected the errors ...then came the Dwaita philosophy ...which again corrected the errors in the earlier two philosophies....
    Nothing came thereafter ...
    This says all

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      By this logic, after Dwaita comes 'Shuddhadvaita'.

  • @examhill937
    @examhill937 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Which one is true is very far first we have to control our senses lead discipline life follow vedic rules n regulation and come to the realization not theoritical that we r not this body

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      True.

  • @dilip8815
    @dilip8815 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Poor explanation. Almost to the point of being disrespectful to Madhwa.

    • @spg6651
      @spg6651 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not really - In fact BHAKTI KEERTHANS are written and mentioned that ADWAITA PHYSOLOPHY is defeated by DWAITA etc.. Dwaita always in fight with ADwaita -- Not otherway

    • @haresrinivasa5226
      @haresrinivasa5226 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@spg6651😂😂😂 nonsense vro

    • @kritharthochakrabarty4648
      @kritharthochakrabarty4648 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Madhwacharya called Jagatguru Adi Shankaracharya Vashyaputra🙂

    • @haresrinivasa5226
      @haresrinivasa5226 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@kritharthochakrabarty4648 where he said please tell me?

  • @atemlebens1457
    @atemlebens1457 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Dude dvaita (tatva vaada) doesn’t say that god and jiva are „Separate“ it says god and jiva are „Different“
    you yourself explained it saying bedha means difference 😊.

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      That is precisely the point. What Shankaracharya explains is, Jeeva and Brahma are 'different' only at the physical, subtle and causal levels. At the ultimate level, there is no difference.

  • @ravishukla884
    @ravishukla884 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dude kabhi aao haveli pe...sab ache se pata chal jaayega...
    Advaita kahan tak lekar jaayega aur Dvaita kahan tak lekar Jaa sakta hai...
    Hare Krishna
    Param Vijayate Shri Krishna Sankirtanam

  • @saralarani2656
    @saralarani2656 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    No right or wrong. It depends on the sisyas prepadness.

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes. Different perspectives.

  • @mr.sandippaul
    @mr.sandippaul 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Your understanding of Madhvāchārya's Tattvavāda is very poor.

    • @KaalaantargatA
      @KaalaantargatA 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The person is focusing only on Advaita of Sri Sankara. Hence the understanding of dwaita of aananda teerta is flawed.

  • @shripatipandurangi9177
    @shripatipandurangi9177 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There is proof for the three types of reality.

  • @rationalityrules111
    @rationalityrules111 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Just a typical overview, no real insight

  • @mady009
    @mady009 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Dvaita is more realistic and provable. No offense to any siddhantha

    • @kawalangdalawahan
      @kawalangdalawahan 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What is the proof sir

    • @venkataanirudhapramodp5589
      @venkataanirudhapramodp5589 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      if u accept ur existence is real then thats the biggest proof@@kawalangdalawahan

    • @spg6651
      @spg6651 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Advaita never says they are in competition with Dvaita .. Where as Dvaita siddnatha people always wants to prove they are superior -- That itself shows their errogance

    • @kawalangdalawahan
      @kawalangdalawahan 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@venkataanirudhapramodp5589acceptance is not proof, that’s called blind faith. so no there’s no proof.

    • @preethamacharya5010
      @preethamacharya5010 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Every child knew dvaita, you need to experience the life to some extend to know advaita

  • @sheshasaipuneeth
    @sheshasaipuneeth 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Your understanding of adwaitha is nice, but it looks like u have a poor understanding of Dwaitha. I feel that you are just more inclined towards adwaitha siddhanta. Read more about dwaitha deeply, too, and then come to a conclusion. It's the basic nature of the aatman to thrive for the love. We being part of the paramatman dont you think that paramatham has the feeling of love? How can a formless supreme absolute reality love something? Devotion is nothing but the ultimate form of love. If there is a lover, there has to be a lovable. Doesn't it make sense?
    There is a reason why Shankara gave this philosophy at that time. I dont have any disrespect towards Sripad. But one has to study the vedas detaily or approach a bonafide guru. Just studying one philosophy deeply and ignoring the other philosophy is foolishness.

  • @StephanieG1
    @StephanieG1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If all is one reality where does avidya(ignorance) come from? If you answer that ignorance is brought about by Maya then you are saying that Maya is as powerful as Brahman and as Brahman is seemingly unable or unwilling to remove Maya from the jivas He cannot be all powerful and in fact an argument can be made that Maya is more powerful than Brahman.
    Out of the three schools of Vedanta Ramanuja's teachings make the most sense to me.

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hi, The problem with this question is that we are assuming 'Avidya/Ignorance' to be a positive entity.
      Let's look at an example. Let's say I'm ignorant of 'Trigonometry'. Where does this ignorance come from? Answer: It doesn't come from anywhere as ignorance is simply the absence of knowledge of something. It always was. But can it end? Of course, when I study trigonometry and understand it, it ends. This is the nature of ignorance. It is technically not something that exists. So, in reality, only Brahman exists. This is Adhvaitha.

  • @user-yx1pg8tb6g
    @user-yx1pg8tb6g 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    WHEN YOU DIE AND REALIZE THAT THE WORLD IS REAL AND NOT MITHYA 🤣

    • @gokulkrishna2667
      @gokulkrishna2667 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Illusion is a reality. Come back and understand what I said after you remove crap from your head😂

    • @spg6651
      @spg6651 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Where where you before your birth -- After death Realizing something itself is erroneous argument -- No one has "talked " to the dead body and got answer to your question

  • @gopinathvenkataramana8760
    @gopinathvenkataramana8760 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Are you, the speaker real or not? It is as simple as that. Are you a transactional reality? Are you not an entity? Even if transactional, that is reality at present in the moment, right? Ok. If you are part of cosmic soul, why your soul ought to have different attributes? If your is the very same as the cosmic soul, why are you capable of ignoble intentions, faultful and imperfect in thought and deed? If you yourself are God, towards whom you will practice bhakthi and why at all bhakthi? Why all this devotional literature which Adi Shankara himself authored?

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      1. I am real.
      2. The true me is not a transactional reality, only the body-mind complex is.
      3. Yes, we are in a transactional reality now, which is not absolute or permanent.
      4. Soul doesnot have different attributes. Mind is what is different in each of us.
      5. imperfection is at the level of the mind.
      6. Bhakti is a beautiful relationship between the jeeva who is immersed in the world and is identified with the body-mind, and the god which is the source of creation and the essence of existence. Bhakti is needed until jeeva realizes god and becomes one with it.
      7. Adi Guru Shankaracharya's devotional literature is to help humanity realize god through devotion. Adi Guru Shankaracharya's other works like Bhashyas and Prakharana granthas are to help humanity realize god through knowledge.
      I think since that God is everywhere, we can find him outside through Bhakti or inside through Jnana. One can choose a path that is most suitable and compatible to him/her.
      Thank you.

  • @kirancs6217
    @kirancs6217 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It needs a rigorous study. All Acharya's promoted Bhakti and all are true and nothing comparable ,all their logics are equally true in the same realm of cosmos.
    Logically Composition and de composition cannot be simply argued , it needs a great depth.
    Some great gurus like Sri Thyagarajs told "Dwaitamu Sukhama ? A - Dvaitamu Sukhamaa ?"
    Which conduces to beatitude (“sukhamaa”), Dvaita or Advaita ? Dvaita which declares that Jivaatma is different from the Paramaatma or Advaita which asserts that they are identical ?
    As the Eternal Witness (“saakshi”) of cosmos (“saarva”), please enlighten me (“maa vinu”), Lord (“Chaitanya”). Throw light (“delpumu”) on this mystery (“vistaaramugaanu”) so that I comprehend (“naato”) it beyond any doubt.
    Supreme and Omnipresent, you are declared to be equally manifest (“dyavanilo”) in all the worlds (“gagana, pavana, tapana, bhuvanaa”) and to delight in sporting in the five elements, Trinity, the celestials and cream of devotees (“bhagavad bhaktha varaagresarulalo”). O worshipped (“archita”) by Tyagaraaja ! Do enlighten (“raminche”) me !

  • @krishnakantamisra1754
    @krishnakantamisra1754 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    According to adwait what's exactly happened in enlightenment or samadhi if enlightenment is a experience then who is the experiencer because there will be no experience without experiencer Adi Shankaracharya say's shivoham but who is the knower of Shivoham to whom it is known that i am Shiva to whom it is known i am pure awareness witnesses consiousnes

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      As per Adhvaitha, Enlightenment is nothing but the dissolution of the mind and being one with the universal awareness or God. It is not 'knowing' in the traditional sense. It is Awareness being aware of itself at the end.

    • @krishnakantamisra1754
      @krishnakantamisra1754 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@adhvaitha well who is the entity who became one with universal awareness,if it is awareness then how is it adwait Swarup there's an awareness and there's one who is aware of it so how in adwait

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@krishnakantamisra1754 An individual Person because of ignorance is seperated from the universal consciousness. As long as there is ignorance, there is division. But in truth, there is only one.

    • @krishnakantamisra1754
      @krishnakantamisra1754 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@adhvaitha well that's like same saying it's indescribable well if we are Brahman why ignorence in us why Maya affected us if it's all like a dream why we came under influence of dream and not knowing it's a dream

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It is a perspective on nature of reality as explained by realized bings and by Upanishads. The 'Why' Question will never have a direct answer. 'Why' can be asked about any philosophy and about anything. 'Why did God create us? Why the Universe was created? etc.,' @@krishnakantamisra1754

  • @proudindian3400
    @proudindian3400 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Swami Vivekananda despite being advaiti did not accept jagath mithya and he told jagath nishwara 😂

    • @Nutrino_1729
      @Nutrino_1729 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Who told you this false news 😂?

    • @proudindian3400
      @proudindian3400 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Nutrino_1729 Swami Vivekananda

    • @Nutrino_1729
      @Nutrino_1729 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@proudindian3400 Did you ever read any letters of swami vivekananda?
      If you had read you would not comment like this.
      Now you show me where he told this , in which lecture / work with proper reference as well as edition.

    • @proudindian3400
      @proudindian3400 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Nutrino_1729 if you have read his works please show me where did he mentioned jagath is mithya. As told in Advaita.

    • @Nutrino_1729
      @Nutrino_1729 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@proudindian3400
      Ay toh wahi bat ho gai " Ulta Chor Kotwal ko Dante" . According to the principal you are the one who first claim that Swami Vivekananda says that Jagat is Mithya , So it should be you who will showcase his statement to prove the opponent is wrong.
      Namaste
      Source: Complete Works of swami vivekananda, 23 edition, vol 1

  • @user-uq1wq1bi5w
    @user-uq1wq1bi5w 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Your Advaita philosophy was defeated long ago by Sri Mdhvacharya (unified incarnation of Lord Hanuman, Vayu Dev & Bheem).
    So your views on philosophy doesn't matter at all.

    • @AdvaiticChrist
      @AdvaiticChrist 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      *_If Ādvaita was defeated then my emotional problems should not have been fixed by Ādvaita. Thanks to Ātma-bodha._*

  • @user-wo5mp4gd4x
    @user-wo5mp4gd4x 20 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา +1

    Sir first accept that you have knowledge only about advita Vedanta
    You don't know dwaita vedanta

  • @vyasarajrithi3693
    @vyasarajrithi3693 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    God is infinite accepted. God has no quality and quantity is not confirming to the first statement God is infinite.

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes, A formless infinite God can anytime take form.

  • @mohannayak712
    @mohannayak712 หลายเดือนก่อน

    God is infinite. Is jeevathma infinite?

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes.

  • @planethome8014
    @planethome8014 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Is it like the movie Inception ?

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Some what 😅. But Reality is systematically and elaborately explained in Adhvaitha Vedantha.

  • @krishnavasishtha6782
    @krishnavasishtha6782 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ,,Adwaita is altimately truthful ndsupreme philosophy.Dvaita is very lower,nd based on puranas.It is not scientific.It is only belief.Madhwacharya has no dwaita sampradaya.Started by him.very very low Sidhdhanta.

  • @helionfelix6280
    @helionfelix6280 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Simultaneously one and different from God. The not dreaming reality.

  • @shripatipandurangi9177
    @shripatipandurangi9177 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The word lower reality, makes no sense

  • @harshitsah1525
    @harshitsah1525 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    it's never about wrong or right. 😂

  • @kaliyugam_moksham
    @kaliyugam_moksham 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    U don't have right to decide which one is gr8 and which one is not gr8😂😂😂

  • @heyitsme3529
    @heyitsme3529 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Whatever you want to say you can jabber over here, because its your session. Individually you cannot criticize one, which needs arguments. You can say I admire advaita over dvaita. But you cannot conclude advaita is better than dvaita as it needs arguments. In a Chess game, if you alone play both the roles, then who's is the winner. To decide a victory you have to undergo many process. So better always say "i like advaita than dvaita" but don't say, since you like advaita, it's the best. If so, then you live in a fools paradise 😅😅😅

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Yes. that's why I said in the beginning, "In my perspective".

    • @Dopeartz
      @Dopeartz 15 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@adhvaithapoor perspective

  • @shripatipandurangi9177
    @shripatipandurangi9177 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The word Illusionary reality making no sence

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  หลายเดือนก่อน

      ?

    • @shripatipandurangi9177
      @shripatipandurangi9177 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@adhvaitha भ्रमप्रकारः सत्यभूतः इति व्याहतम्

  • @knn9335
    @knn9335 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Aham bhramsmi.
    Hiranyashyapu ( HK)had a son named prahalada(P) whom he loved n never hated .
    Now if ur Advaita is right why did a king called HK who said worship me since " I am God " " Aham bhramasmi " was slaughtered by Lord Naramashmha who is " Aham bhramasmi " 🤣🤣🤣 .
    Hence rest of your maya theory is wrong.

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      This only shows ones ignorance of what Adhvaitha Vedanta is actually saying.

    • @knn9335
      @knn9335 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@adhvaitha this exactly shows you did not understand Dvaitha philosophy , the whole of india is suffering because of wrong understanding by adavaitha which has lead to Hindus beening massacred by wrong thinking of mahatma ghandhi who followed advaitha.
      Remember vishata dwaitha came after advaitha, then last came advaitha which corrected both.
      🤣🤣🤣 , bhrama killing bhrama . 🤣🤣🤣 .
      There is only 1 god and we can NEVER become God. 🙏🙏🙏 .

    • @Dopeartz
      @Dopeartz 15 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      Your e​xplanation is poor @@adhvaitha

  • @MM-dh3wr
    @MM-dh3wr 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You cannot collapse everything and say is the only reality. There are noncausal entities in the universe and cannot be converted into one reality. Only causal entities can be….you are just making statements…..

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ultimately, There is only one. This is the fundamental premise of Adhvaitha Vedantha.

    • @MM-dh3wr
      @MM-dh3wr 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@adhvaitha Kevla advaitha

  • @shree_purushottama.
    @shree_purushottama. หลายเดือนก่อน

    Without knowing the depth of the dvaita siddanta and rubbish things comes with your irresponsible knowledge with vedanta sit on the cool minded🙏🙏
    We dont need 3types of satya satya is only one god is omnipotent and jeeva is not a omnipotent.. 🙏 advaita is ends with a imaginary words not with experience 🙏

  • @ayushmanvishwakarma9502
    @ayushmanvishwakarma9502 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    but simply advaitvad is completely trash
    as chaitanya mahaprabhu says mayavad bhashya sule hoye sarv nash
    also shivji himself says in ramcharitmanas that he will incarnate in kaliyug and give the trash philosophy telling everyone that soul and god are one

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      All False Propaganda. Study Upanishads directly.

  • @Outofsampark11
    @Outofsampark11 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Badly refuted by sripada madhvacharya to advait sidhanta.

    • @adhvaitha
      @adhvaitha  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No.

  • @bhubaneswarvibes5
    @bhubaneswarvibes5 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wrost

  • @VinodKumar-jk7mx
    @VinodKumar-jk7mx 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Your knowledge is very poor in dwaita ...sir . Dinot do this kind of shame videos

  • @narasimhasithurea2271
    @narasimhasithurea2271 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Both philosophies boast as if they have accomplished in answering the ultimate quest.Learn from science.

  • @r.r.raagavendhrra2462
    @r.r.raagavendhrra2462 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Dwaita is ultimate truth sri madhwa charya is called poornprajna sri madhwa charya codemned adwaita.Adwaita is totally failure Siddhanta it tells mayavada tatwam it is totally wrong according to veda