📌To try everything Brilliant has to offer-free-for a full 30 days, visit brilliant.org/Universeio/. You’ll also get 20% off an annual premium subscription.
Consider an apple a million kilometer away from Earth that is not moving but time is passing for it therefore the cylinder at that location is limited to the space-time of the apple which the time for apple is the circle, its radius is close to zero. If the apple starts to move toward earth as it gets closer the CONE widens. The circle represents time , a circle with very small radius means steady time. (Circumference=T∝0, d∝0) this means Time is passing but no movement.
The video is a bit deceptive the way it says an object dropped would not possess the ability to continue accelerating. The video is only looking at things from the small scale of the planet Earth. In reality, if there were a planet large enough, the acceleration would in fact continue until the speed of light was eventually reached. There are no known planets of this size; however, the acceleration would theoretically be possible if you did actually have a planet that large.
3 for one on how It gets computed while also simulating away the nature of time as a distance of measure lol and the dialectical vision required. Nice job
Think it goes the other way, physical rods for space and clocks for time maintain the same absolute length Thus the spatial coordinate grid stretches in the radial direction, so that it takes more and more physical rods to make it from one coordinate tick mark to the next Oppositely, in the time direction, the coordinate grid compresses, so that one clock tick near the object includes more and more time tick from farther out The cone narrows towards the body and becomes a point at the Schwarzchild radius
“TIME”. “Time” as it is DOES NOT exist, only MOTION does exist. Here is a simple Argument and simple Logic: We live in ETERNITY, so if we live in a Reality which has No Beginning and No End, while there is only ETERNITY, what “time” Can We Talk About??? How can ETERNITY and “time” go together? ETERNITY and “time” are Incompatible. In ETERNITY there is only MOTION. “Time” is a CODE, “time” is only a way to CODE the MOTION (in our Reality, on our Planet).
Physicist here: I am not sure what to make of the educational value of this presentation as it contains a number of severe conceptual errors that compromise most of the conclusions claimed. For instance, there is the idea of the "speed of proper time", which is nonsense unless you are referring to some comparison with a co-ordinate time at some spacetime point on the observer's path. It makes no sense to speak of any variation of proper time intrinsic to the observer whatever his motion. Then there is the idea of light not propagating somehow. This is some flaw of your periodic boundary condition on time, since light propagation will always have a time advance at a rate =c in any local frame except a degenerate one. Finally is the right you claim to shift from an example of a weak central curvature system like the "drilled earth" to the opposite in the case of mass collapsing to a singularity: no wonder the zero curvature centre of your embedding goes instantly to infinity. You seem to want to make use of the equivalence principle but then ignore it and speak of objective forces - which is it? I don't think this was well thought out.
You hit the event horizon and you get stuck in time and instantly explode due to the black hole exploding sometime in the far future due to Hawking radiation.
I don't think your diagram is correct. Shouldn't you see two bulges in the cylinder? One as you approach the surface and then approach the core, and then another as you approach the other surface and then approach free space?
Yes but space time is not a two-dimensional graph. This is a rat hole argument. Take away any of the 4 elements of existence the 3 spatial dimensions and it's duration - time and the object will cease to exist. Two dimensional space time exists only theory. Sorry for being obtuse but this didn't help at all.
📌To try everything Brilliant has to offer-free-for a full 30 days, visit brilliant.org/Universeio/. You’ll also get 20% off an annual premium subscription.
give this man a nobel prize in explaining...
Sadly, Alfred Nobel didn’t mention pedagogy in his will.
“ChatGPT, write a script for a
Thanks so much for putting a lot of time to make this great video.🎉
I got lost when the space-time plane was rolled into a cylinder.
I think time becomes the circle inside of the cylinder and space is the length of the cylinder.
Consider an apple a million kilometer away from Earth that is not moving but time is passing for it therefore the cylinder at that location is limited to the space-time of the apple which the time for apple is the circle, its radius is close to zero. If the apple starts to move toward earth as it gets closer the CONE widens. The circle represents time , a circle with very small radius means steady time. (Circumference=T∝0, d∝0) this means Time is passing but no movement.
Well done!
Love the soothing music to counter the brain fry.
Pretty amazing the curvature is so great so as to block the two-way speed of light.
The video is a bit deceptive the way it says an object dropped would not possess the ability to continue accelerating. The video is only looking at things from the small scale of the planet Earth. In reality, if there were a planet large enough, the acceleration would in fact continue until the speed of light was eventually reached. There are no known planets of this size; however, the acceleration would theoretically be possible if you did actually have a planet that large.
that planet by definition would have infinite mass because you would need infinite gravitational potential to reach infinite velocity i.e a black hole
Can you do a video on Lorentz transformations?
Sure thing!
3 for one on how It gets computed while also simulating away the nature of time as a distance of measure lol and the dialectical vision required. Nice job
Possible question: What is the relationship between the black hole and the axis of evil?
With retroactive causation with retroactive effect
Nonsense
@@ExistenceUniversity
What do you mean
@@user-96y You are speaking nonsense
@@ExistenceUniversity
I'm telling the truth
There is a lot of documented evidence
@@user-96y Wait I thought you were talking about WWII axis of evil lol
Think it goes the other way, physical rods for space and clocks for time maintain the same absolute length
Thus the spatial coordinate grid stretches in the radial direction, so that it takes more and more physical rods to make it from one coordinate tick mark to the next
Oppositely, in the time direction, the coordinate grid compresses, so that one clock tick near the object includes more and more time tick from farther out
The cone narrows towards the body and becomes a point at the Schwarzchild radius
Wouldn't there be a kind of rotation at the singularity
or simply following a path via the gravity hole in the Indian Ocean (lower gravity) 1:47
After long time seeing brilliant ad promotion 😅
“TIME”. “Time” as it is DOES NOT exist, only MOTION does exist. Here is a simple Argument and simple Logic: We live in ETERNITY, so if we live in a Reality which has No Beginning and No End, while there is only ETERNITY, what “time” Can We Talk About??? How can ETERNITY and “time” go together? ETERNITY and “time” are Incompatible. In ETERNITY there is only MOTION. “Time” is a CODE, “time” is only a way to CODE the MOTION (in our Reality, on our Planet).
Physicist here: I am not sure what to make of the educational value of this presentation as it contains a number of severe conceptual errors that compromise most of the conclusions claimed. For instance, there is the idea of the "speed of proper time", which is nonsense unless you are referring to some comparison with a co-ordinate time at some spacetime point on the observer's path. It makes no sense to speak of any variation of proper time intrinsic to the observer whatever his motion. Then there is the idea of light not propagating somehow. This is some flaw of your periodic boundary condition on time, since light propagation will always have a time advance at a rate =c in any local frame except a degenerate one. Finally is the right you claim to shift from an example of a weak central curvature system like the "drilled earth" to the opposite in the case of mass collapsing to a singularity: no wonder the zero curvature centre of your embedding goes instantly to infinity. You seem to want to make use of the equivalence principle but then ignore it and speak of objective forces - which is it? I don't think this was well thought out.
You hit the event horizon and you get stuck in time and instantly explode due to the black hole exploding sometime in the far future due to Hawking radiation.
I don't think your diagram is correct. Shouldn't you see two bulges in the cylinder? One as you approach the surface and then approach the core, and then another as you approach the other surface and then approach free space?
So What would you see if you fell into a black hole?
Ads for brilliant
Lol
He has the wrong direction of curve
Why would it drop to 0 at the center of the earth? It will still be weighted mass. Peace ✌️ 😎.
👍😊
Yes but space time is not a two-dimensional graph. This is a rat hole argument. Take away any of the 4 elements of existence the 3 spatial dimensions and it's duration - time and the object will cease to exist. Two dimensional space time exists only theory. Sorry for being obtuse but this didn't help at all.
You do not know the truth. We have all been killed. You, all humans, are dead. This is the truth
We all experience memories of the past
Possible question: What is the relationship between the black hole and the axis of evil?
science is not about morality
@@林黑黑-b3c
Yes, regarding behavior and ethics
bulshit, grabity can be 0 at the center of earthe because then the earth nucleus would colapse
Black holes don't exist!
They don't? Show me your evidence that refutes this