Answering Daniel Haqiqatjou
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ก.ย. 2024
- Answering Daniel Haqiqatjou
Follow Muhammad James Sutton here: / @muhammadjamessutton
Your support helps the dawah, jazakumAllahukhairan 🤝:
❤️ Patreon: / ilmstitute
GoFundMe: www.gofundme.c...
PayPal: www.paypal.me/...
CashApp: cash.app/$Brot...
TH-cam Membership: / @saajidlipham
📚 Islamic Classes: courses.ilmsti...
👕 Merch! (shirts, hoodies, etc.): teespring.com/...
🔗 Social Media:
📱 Facebook: / brothersaajid
📱 Twitter: / saajidlipham
📷 Instagram: / brothersaajid
💻 Website: www.ilmstitute.com
🔈 Soundcloud: / user-1260072
🔈 Podcast: itunes.apple.c...
Subhana Allah. I have never seen that Daniel talks about the Rulers being Kuffar. Where does he call the people to make khuruj and takfir ? Why is he from the Khawarij now ? The last question would be : DID YOU ACTUALLY WATCH THE VIDEO ?! DID YOU WATCH HIS VIDEOS ?! May Allah guide us Ameen
See the last video of saajid lipham his hideous takfiri tendencies were exposed there
@Siseneg Ages exactly. They showing that DH is right all the way
Abu Mussab received messages where Daniel does takfir of MBS and UAE rulers
Did u even watch the video. It has nothing to do with your comment
@@HK00088 an ignorant person like daniel is not to be given the light of day to "settle our differences" he should close his youtube channel and sit down and shut up and learn his religion just like the rest of us
And not make himself out as if hes a scholar and a beacon for the people
"You have no knowledge, you are nobody, nobody knows you." With all due respect it sounded very arrogant and many people may say the same thing about you. And if DQ's criticism doesn't make any difference it won’t affect the ruler’s authority over his people, right? Then why you people are so upset?
I understand taking knowledge from well-known scholars and a lot of muslims actually listen to actual scholars like Sh. Albani (Rah.), Sh. Uthaymeen (Rah.) etc. But there are lots of issues which new generation muslims are facing. The west and zi0nists are openly spending billions of dollars to destroy the muslim values, cultures even interfering with muslim education systems. But I don’t see anybody from a certain muslim group warning and educating muslims about these issues. They are too busy calling other muslims jahil, ignorant, deviant.
There are so many graduates from Islamic universities and so called "scholars" but I don't see any of them challenging people who are mocking islam, preaching atheism, liberalism among the muslims. If the so called “scholars” and “students of knowledge” did their job then perhaps the nobodies like Daniel wouldn’t have to open their mouth. Just because someone is a graduate and known to some scholars doesn’t always mean that Allah will bless their knowledge and make it beneficial to the Muslims. Ahmed Deedat (rah.) had no formal education yet Allah has blessed his dawah so much.
I apologize if I said anything to hurt you or said anything too harsh. I rarely comment and english is not my first language.
Your problem thinking that the scholars of the Ummah don't know what they are doing and Daniel is the only person who is protecting Islam, shows where you lack your understanding of the Deen. So you choose to believe that Allah has disregarded the scholars who have stayed upon the Manhaj of the Salaf and given Daniel from Harvard and TH-cam the correct understanding of Deen when you can clearly see the Hadiths and Manhaj prove otherwise? May Allah guide you brother.
Also you're wrong there's a plethora of Salafi scholars that challenges this Sajid, abu taymiyya, etc one of whom actually built a school. And even ways thats not posted on social media, heck I'd even argue are the biggest opponents of liberalism and modern trends
@@casilasgoaler
*1.* I did not say scholars don't know what they are doing.
On the contrary I consider scholars of Islam to be most intelligent and knowledgeable of the people. But no one is infallible other than the Prophets (peach be upon them). And the following hadith may be beneficial to read
Abdullah ibn Amr reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Verily, Allah does not withhold knowledge by snatching it away from his servants, but rather he withholds knowledge by taking the souls of scholars, until no scholar remains and people follow ignorant leaders. They are asked and they issue judgments without knowledge. Thus, they are astray and lead others astray.” (Source: Sahih al-Bukhari 100, Sahih Muslim 2673)
*2.* Would you be kind enough where did I state DQ is the only person protecting Islam? Islam doesn't need anyone's “protection” but Allah, He will protect it Himself. To me both Daniel and Saajid (among million others) are serving Islam. May Allah keep them on the straight path and increase in their good deeds.
*3.* Even the wisest may have lack of understanding in some matters. And Islam doesn’t command us all to become alim. You can be a better Muslim from Harvard or a cab driver, businessman, engineer etc. than be a scholar who leads others astray.
*4.* "So you choose to believe that Allah has disregarded the scholars" quite bold of you to assume something like that about me. I hope you are able to produce the proof in front Allah.
*5.* “Clearly see Hadiths and Manhaj prove otherwise”. Sorry but hundreds of comments are saying that they cannot see clearly. Five scholars can interpret the same hadith in five ways. So as a layman muslim I tend to believe the one who produces most proofs and discuss all ayas from the Quran and hadiths not just the ones that fit their narrative.
Also, there were lots of issues where even the Sahaba (may Allah be pleased with them all) disagreed with each other. So, a muslim from the 21st century should think quite a bit before having the mentality ‘my way or the highway’. And AFAIK scholars of Ahles Sunnah Wal Jama’ah are allowed to differ in their opinions based on the Quran and Sunnah.
*6.* Ameen. May Allah guide us all and rectify our affairs.
*What I really said*
There are people who are not scholars (for example Ahmed Deedat Rah., Zakir Naik) but are serving Islam better than many self-proclaimed "scholars" whose only job is to find fault in other scholars, daees and fellow Muslims.
The enemies of Islam and the Zi0nists are trying their best with military, intelligence, money and media against the muslims. They boost videos of islamophobes, liberals and atheists. There are lots of people who make career out of refuting nad mocking muslims. And they have millions viewers but no scholar is there to refute them on these platforms. I understand that scholars are not superhuman, they cannot be scholars/expert in every branch of knowledge or may not have time to refute them. That means we have lack of scholars who can deal with them.
But when some muslims try to fight them suddenly hundred so called “scholars” and “student of knowledge” pop up who have all the time and knowledge to refute their own fellow muslims. They don’t have the calibre to stand in front of the enemies of Islam but are very eager to fight against the Muslims.
*And finally to me both the Madhkhalis and Kharijis are other sides of the same coin. Both are very harsh to muslims but soft to nonmuslims. One side physically destroys muslims and other group spiritually*
The truth is Daniel set out his case in an intelligent manner neither Sajad nor this individual have done that very well by responding to the issues he raised and asked for a response to. But there seems to be an awful lot of name-calling which they accuse Daniel of. Quite disappointing to see this ....
@@ravondain1931 you very jahl... lib is the symptom, bida is cause, if Islam wasn't misrepresented ppl wouldn't turn to liberalism, its why many reverts learn the Sunnah... if bida didn't divide the umma like Uthmani's sufi ashari bida lead to secularism, they wouldn't have divided & fell, they would of been grounded and united.
"we're not here to answer your questions because you're ignorant and insignificant". SubhanAllah. Isn't the point of being a person of knowledge imparting that knowledge? Can't fathom not having the desire to educate and rectify if one is able to. No on has to respond to DH, but how about addressing the questions for the sake of those who are were exposed to it.
They're not anwsering Daniels questions because they don't have any good anwsers.
Did you watch the video? He answered every claim Daniel made.
@Siseneg Ages
DH called the brothers agents
A khawriji is atleast a muslim , an agent works against islam
You tell me whats worse
@@adamyoutube281 did he answered the 5 questions daniel asked sajid to answer ? No he didnt .What are you watching ?
@Siseneg Ages
The one of the brothers works in a government department?
Yeah , it definitely screams "agent" when a brother works in an electric company owned by the government . This is blatant slander against faris.
DH spoke the truth to intend flasehood
I'm folowing Daniel's telegram channel where he make dawah to khurooj? Which ulama he atacked ya Ustath? Wajdi akkari and Faris are ulama??????? You
throwing accusations without proof and talking about muslim blood and he's dignity is haram to another muslim...
All the conditions for khurooj have been met according to DH
Hi! You should debate Daniel in person, in front of an audience! He invited you for a conversation!
Ustadh James sutton would destroy Daniel in a debate.
I don’t think he has the guts for that. He never debates with the ones who he normally accuses of something.
@@Aemulatius an ignorant person like daniel is not to be given the light of day to "settle our differences" he should close his youtube channel and sit down and shut up and learn his religion just like the rest of us
And not make himself out as if hes a scholar and a beacon for the people
Show us the evidence that he did
@@user-ok2rc1jz8u May Allah forgive you to make such statements
FLAWS IN THIS VIDEO
"You are not Al-Albani, nor Ibn Baz nor Ibn Taymiyya. You are not on their level and they have the right to do public inkar when they deem it beneficial, effective and necessary."
ANSWER: Daniel never claimed to be on their level. This is a strawman.
Of course Ulama should do public inkar of a tyrannical ruler when they deem it necessary.
Problem is, that same Ulama is being arrested by the tyrannical ruler.
That was the case back then, too.
Ibn Hanbal got arrested and even flogged by the tyrannical ruler (hence Ibn Hanbals students publicly protested)
Besides, who are according to you "the 'Ulama, who have the level to criticise rulers"?
Who decides who is a big enough scholar to condemn a ruler?
This obviously opens the door to blind government-loyalists to push opportunists as authorities (no wonder the CIA in official papers praises you madkhali-guys and Rabi al Madkhali and suggests financing you)
When Ibn Baz and Ibn Uthaymeen say that Sayyid Qutb was a Muslim and that his books have wrong but also beneficial content, you have no problem. They are excused.
If a professor of fiqh in some Saudi Uni, with decades of teaching, said that, the Saudi regime arrests him.
Why is this Ustadh not a big enough Alim for you?
The same question can be posed here in matter of condemning the ruler and the double standards of you madkhalis become apparent.
"Nobody has to answer you to anything. You are just arrogant for expecting that."
ANSWER: Yes, you do have to answer.
These makhali ideologues Wajdi and Faris and omar Chatila have attacked Daniel and warned from him.
Daniel explains why his views are correct and in line with the Salaf and the scholarly tradition.
Now, when accusing a fellow Muslim like that, you are obliged to give an explanation. If not in this world, then surely in the Hereafter you will be held accountable and questioned why you labeled people the way you did.
Since we are at labeling, calling Daniel arrogant and shizophrenic is just a pathetic ad hominem attack by sutton.
Sutton, may Allah guide you.
The only flaw is in your understanding of the evidence presented.
It's ironic how these bootlickers are proving Daniel right by making a weak sauce response like this.
@@muhammadjamessutton Brother, his issue is not what you're presenting, it's the questions that weren't answered. No need to get arrogant. I too have questions but everyone is bringing up rebellion and not really answering the questions I have. And I'm not even taking sides here. So you present yourself as a student of knowledge but avoid answering questions and say someone's understanding it flawed. Imagine going to a scholar and wanting to learn the Deen and you get refused if something didn't make sense to you. Humble yourself a bit bro.
@@muhammadjamessutton come on man just come clean, how much are they paying you? 2000..3000?
@@abdullamomak3470 Bro come on, we don't have a good reason to accuse him of being an agent. It's just as childish as him accusing Daniel of having schizophrenia.
Arguing over little details.Thought Brother Sajid was smarter than this.
All Muslim Skeptic did was give a heads up to the Muslims against the behaviour of the rulers like in Arabia for bringing in paganism things like Halloween parties with music and so on into the Muslim lands,amongst other things which are blatantly scrutinise worthy and you guys are bombarding Daniel with all these labels and negative portrayal.
Brother Sajid and the likes need to slow down and watch the recent video by Daniel a few more times.Sajid is acting like Daniel told everyone to take up arms and go on a killing spree.He was scrutinising the evil of these rulers for their many evils and pushing back at liberalism itself.These things go together because that's the main evil that is being advocated in these actions to the world and especially destroying the barriers of the Muslim homes and minds.
The more the Muslim world knows from an intellectual stand point about the liberal agendas pushed by these rulers the less effect it has on the Muslim world as a whole and at least the Muslims can live according to true teachings and preserve Islamic family values no matter how much liberalism is pushed on us.Brother Daniel is at the forefront of this and it's great because he is pushing true Islamic values from the valid authentic sources and doing it very sound and intelligently.His work is strengthening Muslim men to be leaders to their wives and families and helping preserve it in the long run.
go learn dean from your deobandi fanboy who acts as salafi between salafis and a deobandi amongst debobandis etc. he isnt even firm in hes deen and aqeeda so how can hes followers be , daniel is a big joke , every one with littel knowledge can see this
Bro the only ‘answer’ he gave to DH is that Shaykh Albani r.a is a scholar and you’re not. Therefore, he can criticize and you can’t. Hence, he’s not a khawarij, but you are. Like wth! 🤯 where does it say only non scholars can be labeled as kahawarij?
The brother labeled different examples answers and sources, but that's all you got, not too mention the overlooking of the mistakes Daniel made in citing his sources.
Sounds like it all went over your head, child.
So it’s okay to label people Schizophrenic? What medical evidence do you that Daniel is schizophrenic? If you have no medical evidence then you should publicly apologize to him.
The video mostly talking about Kawarij and how they are not considered Kuffar,
But the issue at hand is “public Inkar of the ruler”
انا لا ادعو للخروج و الثورة
و لكن لا يمكنني تجاهل الإقرار بأن بعض الحكام العرب الحاليين و حكوماتهم غاصبة و ظالمة و حتى متامرة ضد شعوبها. لا أحد يمكنه إنكار ذلك، حكومة السعودية تؤدي بشعبها إلى الهاوية عبر نشر الانحلال الأخلاقي و دعوة الفسقة والعهرة و نصب الاحتفالات الماجنة، كذلك سجن العلماء الذين انكروا ذلك و هو ظلم كبير. الإمارات تتعاون مع الصهاينة، كذلك البحرين و المملكة المغربية، لا يمكننا تجاهل هذه الأمور و التظاهر برضانا عنها. طبعا ليس اي من هذه الأمور يستدعي الخروج، و لكن يستدعي النظر و يستدعي الاستياء، و لا يجب ابدا تجاهله بل يجب التوعية بمثل هذه الأمور و الا لضاع وعي الأمة بمشاكلها و انحلت فيها.
The Messenger of Allah (salallāhu ‘alaihi wasallam) said: “If one of you sees something from the ruler that he hates, let him not publicise it.” This is a clear hadeeth forbidding openly protesting and publicly speaking against the ruler. Then he peace be upon him gave the Muslims a method of correcting the ruler: “Rather you should take the ruler by his hand into seclusion and advise him privately. If he accepts the advice, then that is good. If he refuses, then you have fulfilled your duty.” - Sahi Hadeeth reported by Imām Ahmad in al-Musnad 3/403 no. 15369, As-Sunnah of Ibn Abī ‘Āsim 3/102 no. 910.
Hudhayfa ibn al-Yaman reported: I asked, “O Messenger of Allah, we were living in an evil time and Allah brought us good in which we live now. Will there be evil after this good?” The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Yes.” I said, “And any good after this evil?” The Prophet said, “Yes.” I said, “And any evil after this good?” The Prophet said, “Yes.” I said, “How will it be?” The Prophet said, “Rulers after me will come who do not follow my guidance and my Sunnah. Some of their men will have the hearts of devils in a human body.” I said, “O Messenger of Allah, what should I do if I live to see that time?” The Prophet said, “You should listen and obey them, even if the ruler strikes your back and takes your wealth, even still listen and obey.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1847 Grade: Sahih (authentic)
According to Muslim عن حُذَيْفَة بْن الْيَمَانِ قُلْتُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ إِنَّا كُنَّا بِشَرٍّ فَجَاءَ اللَّهُ بِخَيْرٍ فَنَحْنُ فِيهِ فَهَلْ مِنْ وَرَاءِ هَذَا الْخَيْرِ شَرٌّ قَالَ نَعَمْ قُلْتُ هَلْ وَرَاءَ ذَلِكَ الشَّرِّ خَيْرٌ قَالَ نَعَمْ قُلْتُ فَهَلْ وَرَاءَ ذَلِكَ الْخَيْرِ شَرٌّ قَالَ نَعَمْ قُلْتُ كَيْفَ قَالَ يَكُونُ بَعْدِي أَئِمَّةٌ لَا يَهْتَدُونَ بِهُدَايَ وَلَا يَسْتَنُّونَ بِسُنَّتِي وَسَيَقُومُ فِيهِمْ رِجَالٌ قُلُوبُهُمْ قُلُوبُ الشَّيَاطِينِ فِي جُثْمَانِ إِنْسٍ قَالَ قُلْتُ كَيْفَ أَصْنَعُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ إِنْ أَدْرَكْتُ ذَلِكَ قَالَ تَسْمَعُ وَتُطِيعُ لِلْأَمِيرِ وَإِنْ ضُرِبَ ظَهْرُكَ وَأُخِذَ مَالُكَ فَاسْمَعْ وَأَطِعْ 1847 صحيح مسلم كتاب الإمارة باب وجوب ملازمة جماعة المسلمين عند ظهور الفتن
Awf ibn Malik reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “The best of your rulers are those whom you love and they love you, who pray for you and you pray for them. The worst of your rulers are those whom you hate and they hate you, whom you curse and they curse you.” It was said, “Shall we confront them with swords?” The Prophet said, “No, as long as they establish prayer among you. If you find something hateful from them, you should hate their actions but not withdraw your hand from obedience.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1855 Grade: Sahih (authentic)
According to Muslim عَنْ عَوْفِ بْنِ مَالِكٍ عَنْ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ قَالَ خِيَارُ أَئِمَّتِكُمْ الَّذِينَ تُحِبُّونَهُمْ وَيُحِبُّونَكُمْ وَيُصَلُّونَ عَلَيْكُمْ وَتُصَلُّونَ عَلَيْهِمْ وَشِرَارُ أَئِمَّتِكُمْ الَّذِينَ تُبْغِضُونَهُمْ وَيُبْغِضُونَكُمْ وَتَلْعَنُونَهُمْ وَيَلْعَنُونَكُمْ قِيلَ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ أَفَلَا نُنَابِذُهُمْ بِالسَّيْفِ فَقَالَ لَا مَا أَقَامُوا فِيكُمْ الصَّلَاةَ وَإِذَا رَأَيْتُمْ مِنْ وُلَاتِكُمْ شَيْئًا تَكْرَهُونَهُ فَاكْرَهُوا عَمَلَهُ وَلَا تَنْزِعُوا يَدًا مِنْ طَاعَةٍ 1855 صحيح مسلم كتاب الإمارة باب خيار الأئمة وشرارهم
And this Hadith goes in line with the statement of Sahl ibn Abdillah at tustari Rahimahullah , The wisdom behind these traditions is that violent rebellion, which is civil war, is almost certainly worse than the oppression of any government ruler. The long track-record of failed rebellions and harmful civil wars has led latter scholars to achieve consensus on the prohibition of insurrection. Stated Imaam Barbahaaree in Sharh us-Sunnah: "If you find a man making supplication against the ruler, know that he is a person of innovation. If you find a person making supplication for the ruler to be upright, know that he is a person of the Sunnah, if Allaah wills. Fudayl ibn 'Iyaad said, ''If I had an invocation which was to be answered, I would not make it except for the ruler.'' It was said to him, ''O Abu 'Alee, explain that to us,'' he replied, ''If I were to make an invocation for myself, it would not go beyond me. Whereas if I make it for the ruler, he is corrected and through that, the servants and the land are set in order.'' We are ordered to make supplication for them (ie. the rulers) to be upright. We have not been ordered to make supplication against them, even if they commit tyranny and oppression, since their tyranny and oppression reflect only upon themselves but their rectitude is good for themselves and the Muslims."....................
÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷
@@mohammadadnan9685 There's absolutely no way I'd be able to talk to these kings in private. Moreover I'm not talking about them, I'm talking about their policies. Never said anything personal about the rulers.
If I can't say these straight facts above, then it really starts getting ridiculous. Again, not calling for rebellion whatsoever. But still, you want us to just literally ignore what happens around us and act as if nothing is happening while our ummah is being destroyed from within and without?? Basically just let whatever happen, don't talk about it, just shut up and do as you're told. It's a strange image of a muslim citizen you have, a dead bot that is not allowed to interact with his environment.
“One day Umar Stood up to deliver a sermon; in it, he said,
‘O people, whoever among you sees any crookedness in me in my character, my deals, my action, then let him straighten out that crookedness.’
A man from the audience called out, “by Allaah, were we to see any crookedness in you, we would have straightened it out with out swords.’
Umar then said, All praise is for Allaah, who has placed in this nation someone who will straighten the crookedness of Umar with his sword.’”
Akhbaar Umar (pg 231,232) and Ar-Riyaadh an Nadirah.
See the podcast of AbdurRahman Hassan on rebelling against muslim leader there is probably an explanation of this hafith.
@@selfresurgence4394 yes of course, there's always ways to go around the truth for people of desire.
@@alia-wm8ug the hadith says advice rulers in private like Musa did to Firaun, the point was Umar has ppl who stand for the truth that's all, don't take things and cut and paste it, that only shows you are a person of kathib
@@911mossadvanbomberplotaipa8 I can say the same for you
@@alia-wm8ug
Sure scholars are bootlickers and laymen are the scholars now
Idk how many times people need this clarification. Daniel NEVER called for rebellion, watch his videos!!! He consistently shares that we must enjoin what’s good and forbid evil, and we must be brave enough to call out the wrongdoings of anyone, including publicly criticizing the rulers (when private confrontation is not possible).
Criticising the rulers is not our job leave it to ulema. Daniel is not a scholar so he doesn't know when to to criticize it or to leave it.
Yes he did call for rebellion. The Halloween video was not an isolated video. His been spewing khariji nonsense on his telegram.
I agree with you
Doesnt convince me.
Few good points but doesnt convince me on a whole. everyone should obey one thing. Follow every muslim ruler than. Why involved in civil war in other country in coup?
Sheikh al assim also spoke something about this sect. There whole point comes to defend arab rulers but dont apply same rule to other muslim rulers. Also let the ruler invite filth and shirk onto the land of tawheed?
A temple has been raised in uae and it was allowed under secularism.
There is something very wrong in our ummah right noe
Daniel brought up 6 points and if he is really spreading deviancy then why is none of them being answered
@@abdallaMoa I honestly don't know what you guys are talking about and this shows how jahl Dan and his followers are turning the din to a joke, even in Islam there is ettiquette of bringing proof to those you disagree wih...
Because they can't refute the points Daniel brought up. Instead they have to attack his character. They lost the argument and everyone who is honest with themselves has to admit that.
@@shadowbond6284 the brother corrected Dan's lies... so what's the problem?
What was Dan's questions? Kindly List them and be concise as sunna says to save time, so I can see if what you say in public is true.
You And Sajjad both are talking now without main point. If khawarij are have muslim rights why sajjad need to remove videos with Daniel ? Sajjad Definitely talking about rebelling against ruler. You guys are playing with word.
Didn’t brother Haqiqatju already declared that he did not call to revolt on the ruler?
I thought they had an open meeting and resolved the misunderstanding.
Why is everyone attacking everyone in public? This is getting out of hand.
His telegram activities say otherwise. The issue is that he is dishonest.
man, this attack on brother Daniel is soooo strange
no one of his audience or associates mentioned anything near khuruj, no one accused him of this until a couple online sheikhs rised up all at once accusing him without having any clear cut statement of khuruj from Daniel
I don't know, it's strange and I can't wrap my head around it
there's no explanation except that the Saudi Government has so much apologists and influence .. because Daniel criticized a lot of islamic deviants and liberalized islam apologists, but the second he calls out the Saudi Government, everyone lost their minds
real
That's right. He called out a government, that's the difference. As for the Halloween video, that is not an isolated situation. He's been saying a lot on his telegram too. The last video by saajid clarifies this. DH is double-faced.
@@aaliyah3037
with all due respect to Sajid, I like his work and appreciate him, but I don't see his criticisms of Daniel are legitimate .. I knew this while I was listening to him on the spot, I was like "no that's not true" , "him saying X doesn't necessarily means Y"
what Sajid did in his last video can easily be done to ANYONE if you cherry picked multiple individual sentences that seems to contradict each other out of their context
Sajid's video was disappointing because I thought he would answer Daniel's questions or at least address his video and engage in a conversation to reconcile the misconception .. but all he did was gathering some screenshots and clips to point out supposed contradictions in Daniel's speech
I hope they resolve this misunderstanding
@@ahmedsayed8012 Yes, you're right that saying X doesn't necessarily mean Y but when you constantly focus on that and refuse to stop speaking about the rulers even after having been advised multiple times, it definitely does say something. People didn't randomly start criticising DH for the Halloween video, he was advised even before that for several other statements of his. And please let us know where Saajid took DH's words out of context.
@@aaliyah3037
Please, tell me the Khuruj statements that he made, like quotes
I knew you can't answer Daniel. The best you can do is to say some random stuffs, throw some insults and add some Arabic terminology in your sentences. YES THIS IS THE BEST YOU CAN DO
So according to you the Hadith and the Tafsir are "random stuffs and Arabic"? Open your eyes bro. May Allah guide you.
@@casilasgoaler I peeped that too, some of these people need to get off the comments
@@casilasgoalerbro these guys want their desires and answers in the English language 🤣 no point replying to them honestly. Probably very young zealous and over emotional keyboard warriors that have no ilm
@@casilasgoaler If you dont know arabic it does sound like random stuff
Foolish comment from a foolish fanboy. Shame on you.
You really didn’t answer Daniel’s questions either. Also just in case you don’t know, the first people that are getting thrown in jail nowadays for no reason other than enjoining good and forbidding evil to the people in power are ulama and duat who have done nothing but great teaching and work for the ummah. Also when you guys try to defend the ruler you gotta remember that a ruler is supposed to be appointed by the people or shoora which is similar to pure uncorrupt elections, not those zionists and English men who have appointed them for the very purpose of destroying the Deen and robbing and corrupting our countries and youth!! You guys are sooooo different from the salaf!! May Allah guide you!!
1) It is not permissible to rebel against a ruler merely because he is oppressive.
2) A ruler's rule can be valid even without the consent of the majority. An individual can legitimately rule if they have the support of the elite/people of influence (Ahl al-all wa-l-aqd). Throughout history, the vast majority of muslim rulers were elected to power not by the people as a whole but rather by the elites in power. Their pledge of allegiance is sufficient.
this video just proved daniel to be right
These ppl are literally fighting for secularisim saying as long as you can pray in your home dont criticize the goverment for any public degeneracy.
And i dont know why he was saying daniel cant forbid evil and enjoin good because he isnt a scholar, for the most part what is good and evil is preety clear to everyone. I dont need a scholar to tell me what i can clearly see.
@@vypa-bk1iy hotak zamaray 🐺🐺🦁🏳🏳
Fr this guy doesn't seem to mention any of the points that Daniel made in his video and instead is nitpicking on the fact that Daniel isn't an "expert" in Islam or whatever.
@@believeranon5686 True, seems like an emotional response. I thought deflecting & character assassination was beneath scholars.
To the brothers saying "this causes disunity , please stop".
We need to disunite ourselves from falsehood and unite upon the truth(tawheed).
There is no use of unity if our hearts are disunited.
Edit:
To the people siding with DH
- DH belittles aqeeda by saying its just a "plaything" . Aqeedah is the foundation of the deen. If it is corrupted, so too will everything else be.
- Supports deobandi movement , no different then supporting sufism. A proper Muslim adheres to the Quran and sunnah by the understanding of our righteous predecessors (the salaf)
- Is friends with shayk haytham sayfaddin , a takfiri khariji with links to Al qaida innovators like Sulayman al-Alwan who allows suicide missions to be permissible in islam .
Abu Huraira reported: The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “A man is upon the religion of his best friend, so let one of you look at whom he befriends.”
Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 2378
بارك الله فيك
Thank you. Unity isn't achieved by ignoring deviance.
@@Zzucia Daniel thinks the opposite lol. He has downplayed the importance of purifying aqeedah before attempting to politically unite.
@@aq4356 Yep, I've seen it. He referred to Aqeedah as a "plaything" without Khilafah. May Allah guide him.
@@Zzucia
No way , he couldn't go that low
evidence? , If u dont mind me asking
Jazakallah khair
Your point of Shaykh Ul Islam and Alalbani was not clear. So you can't criticize the ruler but if you have knowledge you can criticize him? What is the threshold of knowledge that allows you to criticize the ruler?
Can't you see that they're making it up as they go, clear sign of biddah.
I was not only waiting for this video but praying for it.
Daniel is confusing the community and bringing harm because most of the viewers are laymen and have no basis in ‘aqeedah
جزاك الله خيرا
E X A C T L Y.All his audiences are BASHING in every response videos by calling Bootlickers,Madhkali etc.They are also demanding proper answer.Lol they are not in this video though😂.
@@basedblackbeard4456 Lol just watching Daniel referring "BRO HAJJI"(the uneducated JAHIL who said he will kiss the grave of Rasulﷺ) Yeah Daniel is gone long from the True Aqeedah.Good luck with your Ikhwani Manhaj.💩💩💩💩
Much appreciated Sheikh. We keep telling the people how ignorant and slanderous this man is and instead of the people taking heed and protecting themselves from these trails and chaos, they continue to attack, insult and lie at any cost.
This is all the ramification of what they learn from DH. He is actively teaching them bad manners, name calling and lowliness. All in the name of supposedly defending Islaam.
Sad state to be in indeed.
Assalamualaikum ustad
I love you
From a brother , jazakallah khair
@UCSVFKDTLd4-SvhMeo7hAfsw
Assalamualaikum akhi
May Allah keep you on the truth
I would say is to learn from proper scholars about your religion, foundations of islam , about Allah , his rights and attributes etc . For now , i would say is to avoid this and prioritize whats important , maybe in the future this whole stuff would make sense after you learn about your deen
May Allah bless you so much akhi
@@weldalhaj4163 The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "Whoever has the following four (characteristics) will be a pure hypocrite and whoever has one of the following four characteristics will have one characteristic of hypocrisy unless and until he gives it up.
1. Whenever he is entrusted, he betrays.
2. Whenever he speaks, he tells a lie.
3. Whenever he makes a covenant, he proves treacherous.
4. Whenever he quarrels, he behaves in a very imprudent, evil and insulting manner."
Bukhari 34
@@weldalhaj4163 easy with the accusations akhi, don't forget that everything you type and say is being recorded
And by "recorded" I mean by the angels sorry I should've written that earlier
i was becoming aware of the chanel of haqiqatjou since a couple of month and was rally disturbed about it from the beginning. the comment section where muslim people saying really hateful and arrogant things disturbed me the most. maybe youtube is not a good way of dawah because many people will be confused and misguided. who s seeking for knowledge really should read the books and contact people that really studied the religion. a'udu billahi mina shaytani rahjeem. thx for this vid, may allah guide us to the right path and forgive us all. salam 3leikum
Where your daleel about he calling to khurooj?
You told on video he calling us to khurooj and than move on to explain who is khawareej.
Making a response video with the highlighting point "Nobody has to respond to you". 😂😂😂
*DO YOU EVEN KNOW WHAT RANDKHALIS MEANS? DANIEL IS USING FOUL LANGUAGES AGAINST ALL SALAFI BROTHERS "RAND" MEANS PROSTITUTE AND KHALIS ACCORDING TO JAAHIL SKEPTIC MEANS MADKHALIS/AGENTS AND BOOTLICKERS SO IN 1 WORD ON HIS LATEST VIDEO THUMBNAIL HE PORTRAYED SALAFI BROTHERS ABU MUSAB, SAAJID LIPHAM, FARIS HAMMADI AND ANOTHER SALAFI BROTHER AND TRUE SALAFI MUSLIMS IN GENERAL AS : PROSTITUTES AND AGENTS AND BOOTLICKERS OF MUSLIM RULERS! NAOOZUBILLAH AND U TAKE YOUR ISLAMIC KNOWLEDGE FROM THIS FOUL MOUTHED DANIEL SKEPTIC!*
Save this note for the khawarij:
✅👑 *MONARCHY/KINGSHIP & KHILAFAH R ALL ALLOWED IN ISLAM1️⃣If monarchy/kingship is wrong, then why did Allah تعالى appoint Taloot as a king⁉️{& their Prophet said to them:Indeed Allah has appointed Talut as a king over you"} ►Quran2:2472️⃣If kingship is wrong then why were Prophets Dawood & Sulaiman عليهم السلام ruling as kings⁉️3️⃣If the kingship is wrong in itself, then why did the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم not warn against it when he said:The Caliphate of Prophecy will last 30 years✅then Allah will give the Kingdom or His Kingdom to anyone He wills►✅AbuDawud 4646/4647 & Tirmizi 2226 & graded as Hasan Sahih by ShaikhAlbani✅This was a perfect opportunity for the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم to warn against monarchy, but he didn't✅If a ruler/king has done something wrong, then this is a completely different subject4️⃣If establishing Khilafah is the reason why Allah تعالى sent the Prophets, then why did Yusuf عليه السلام cooperate with the king? Why did he عليه السلام ask to be the guardian of the storehouse instead of working to establish the Khilafah⁉️NO MATTER WHAT TYPE OF RULERSHIP it is, the sole purpose is to establish WORSHIP of Allah ALONE TAWHEED☝Messenger of Allah ﷺ said “I have been commanded (by Allah) to fight people until they testify أن لا إله إلا الله وأن محمدا رسول الله & perform Salah & pay Zakah✅If they do so, they will have protection of their blood & property from me except when justified by Islam & then account is left to Allah”►[Sahihain]✅Allah’s promise is that whoever establishes His Worship, Allah will give them authority, make it easy for them to practice their religion & provide them safety BUT SOME PEOPLE TRY TO DO THE OPPOSITE, saying we will 1st establish Khilafah & then work on Tawheed🔥AJEEB🔥Astaghfirullah Naoozubillah*
*وَعَدَ اللَّـهُ الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا مِنكُمْ وَعَمِلُوا الصَّالِحَاتِ لَيَسْتَخْلِفَنَّهُمْ فِي الْأَرْضِ كَمَا اسْتَخْلَفَ الَّذِينَ مِن قَبْلِهِمْ وَلَيُمَكِّنَنَّ لَهُمْ دِينَهُمُ الَّذِي ارْتَضَىٰ لَهُمْ وَلَيُبَدِّلَنَّهُم مِّن بَعْدِ خَوْفِهِمْ أَمْنًا ۚ يَعْبُدُونَنِي لَا يُشْرِكُونَ بِي شَيْئًا ۚ وَمَن كَفَرَ بَعْدَ ذَٰلِكَ فَأُولَـٰئِكَ هُمُ الْفَاسِقُونَ*
*{Allah has promised those among you who believe &do righteous good deeds, that He will certainly grant them succession to (the present rulers) in the earth as He granted it to those before them & that He will grant them the authority to practice their religion, that which He has chosen for them (Islam) & He will surely give them in exchange a safe security after their fear (provided) they (believers) WORSHIP Me & do not associate anything (in worship) with Me BUT WHOEVER DISBELIEVED AFTER THIS, they are the Rebellious►**24:55*
*Also read:The Khilafah Lasted for 30 Years Then There Was Kingship Which Allaah Gives To Whomever He Pleases*
*U JAHIL TAKFEERI IDEOLOGIST🤦🏻♂️😴SO ACCORDING TO YOU, A RULER WHO UNJUSTLY LASHES YOUR BACK AND SNATCHES YOUR WEALTH AND PROPERTY IS FOLLOWING SHARIAH LAW⁉️ SAHIH MUSLIM💚U KNOW BETTER THAN SAHIH MUSLIM⁉️ U KNOW BETTER THAN RASOOLULLAH SALLALLAHUALAIHIWASALLAM ⁉️ HE LITERALLY SAID RULERS WILL NOT FOLLOW HIS SUNNAH AND WILL NOT GIVE U YOUR RIGHTS BUT WE SHOULD GIVE THEM THEIR RIGHTS & BE PATIENT UNTIL WE MEET RASOOLULLAHﷺ ON JUDGEMENT DAY INSHAA ALLAH ☝🏻AND U MADE AN EXCEPTION THAT ITS ONLY FOR THOSE WHO RULE BY SHARIAH IMPECCABLY⁉️WOW YOUR KHARIJI ARROGANCE IS TOO MUCH*
*MESSAGE TO RHYAD JAAHIL:You provided zero proofs of PRIORITIZING POLITICAL POWER & SOVEREIGNTY & ESTABLISHING KHILAFAH OVER ESTABLISHING TAWHEED u jaahil revolutionist ikhwani SAYYID QUTB IDEOLOGIST‼️PROPHETﷺ NEVER SAID BUILD KHILAFAH BEFORE ESTABLISHING TAWHEED‼️HE PREACHED ONLY TAWHEED FOR 13 YEARS IN MAKKAH & NEVER WARNED AGAINST ZINA ALCOHOL ROBBERY ETC. HE ONLY WARNED AGAINST SHIRK 1ST🔥✅️He said stick to THE JAMA'AH MAIN MUSLIM BODY i.e. Muslim rulers & kings in obedience‼️NO NEED FOR KHILAFAH WHEN U HAVE KINGSHIP MULOOKIYYAH‼️Rulership is also kingship MULOOKIYYAH JUST LIKE KSA🇸🇦& UAE🇦🇪 ALHUMDULILLAH✅️WHEN U HAVE MUSLIM KINGS‼️U DONT NEED KHILAFAH AS AN OBLIGATION AT ALL‼️KHILAFAH IS MUSTAHABB RECOMMENDED BUT NEVER FARD‼️SHOW ME 1 AYAH FROM THE QURAN WHERE ALLAH SAID KHILAFAH IS FARD⁉️OR ANY SAHIH HADITH WHERE PROPHET MUHAMMADﷺ PRIORITIZED ESTABLISHING KHILAFAH BEFORE ESTABLISHING TAWHEED☝🏻Khilafah is NOT FARD‼️IT'S ONLY A GIFT FROM ALLAH IF WE FULFIL IT'S CONDITIONS AS ALLAH SAID IN SURAH NOOR **24:55* ✅️
*_وَعَدَ اللَّـهُ الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا مِنكُمْ وَعَمِلُوا الصَّالِحَاتِ لَيَسْتَخْلِفَنَّهُمْ فِي الْأَرْضِ كَمَا اسْتَخْلَفَ الَّذِينَ مِن قَبْلِهِمْ وَلَيُمَكِّنَنَّ لَهُمْ دِينَهُمُ الَّذِي ارْتَضَىٰ لَهُمْ وَلَيُبَدِّلَنَّهُم مِّن بَعْدِ خَوْفِهِمْ أَمْنًا ۚ يَعْبُدُونَنِي لَا يُشْرِكُونَ بِي شَيْئًا ۚ وَمَن كَفَرَ بَعْدَ ذَٰلِكَ فَأُولَـٰئِكَ هُمُ الْفَاسِقُونَ_*
*_{Allah has promised those among you who believe & do righteous good deeds, that He will certainly grant them succession (khilafah) to (the present rulers) in the earth as He granted it to those before them & that He will grant them the authority to practice their religion, that which He has chosen for them (Islam) & He will surely give them in exchange a safe security after their fear (provided) they (believers) WORSHIP Me & do not associate anything (in worship) with Me BUT WHOEVER DISBELIEVED AFTER THIS, they are the Rebellious►_**_24:55_*
☝🏻 *_Khilafah Rashida or Prophetic Khilafah ended after 30 years‼️ESTABLISHING A Khilafah is NOT an obligation in Islam‼️ESTABLISHING TAWHEED IN SOCIETY IS THE MOST IMPORTANT OBLIGATION IN ISLAM‼️ ALSO KINGSHIP OR MULOOKIYYAH IS ALSO AN ISLAMIC SYSTEM WHICH DOES NOT NEED KHILAFAH TO REPLACE IT✅️IF KHILAFAH WAS AN OBLIGATION, WHY WOULD MUAAWIYAH RADIALLAHUANHU RULE AS A KING FOR 19 YEARS (instead of starting a new Khilafah after those 30 years of prophetic caliphate including AbuBakr Umar Usman Ali RadiAllahuAnhum) & THEN HIS SON YAZEED BECAME KING WITH OVER 60 COMPANIONS PLEDGING ALLEGIANCE TO YAZEED⁉️‼️KINGSHIP IS 100% HALAL & ISLAMIC HENCE WE HAVE KINGSHIP IN KSA UAE ETC. NO NEED FOR A KHILAFAH WHEN WE HAVE MUSLIM KINGS ALHUMDULILLAH!_*
*Rhyad is wrong‼️SAAJID IS CORRECT✅️ CORRECT TRANSLATION IS: THERE IS NO GOD WORTHY OF WORSHIP EXCEPT ALLAH*
*_ALL RADICAL KHARIJI TAKFIRI EXTREMIST IDEOLOGIES SUCH AS CIVILIAN KILLINGS SUIC!DE BOMB!NGS ETC🔥DEBUNKED BY PROPHET MUHAMMADﷺ✅️AbuAminaEliasاعوذ بالله من الشيطان الرجيم بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم✅️It is NOT LAWFUL for us to violently rebel against an unjust Muslim ruler or any ruler, as long as we can practice the basics of Islam in safety. Rather Muslims MUST be patient & encourage reform through non-violent action✅️Obedience to civil laws, whether in a Muslim or non-Muslim state, is obligatory as long as we are not commanded to commit sins✅️If the rulers command us to commit sins or they stubbornly persist in oppression, then we must strive to reform them without resorting to violence or destabilizing civil order✅️Allah said:يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا أَطِيعُوا اللَّهَ وَأَطِيعُوا الرَّسُولَ وَأُولِي الْأَمْرِ مِنكُمْ✅️Oh you who believe obey Allah & obey the Messenger & those in authority among you✅️Quran 4:59✅️IbnUmar reported The Prophet saidالسَّمْعُ وَالطَّاعَةُ عَلَى الْمَرْءِ الْمُسْلِمِ فِيمَا أَحَبَّ وَكَرِهَ مَا لَمْ يُؤْمَرْ بِمَعْصِيَةٍ فَإِذَا أُمِرَ بِمَعْصِيَةٍ فَلَا سَمْعَ وَلَا طَاعَةَ✅️Listening to & obeying the leader is an obligation upon a Muslim, whether he likes it or dislikes it, as long as he is not commanded to disobey Allah. If he is commanded to disobey, then there is no listening or obedience✅️Bukhari 2796 Grade Muttafaqun Alayhi✅️In many narrations the Prophet FORBADE us from rebelling against the rulers as long as they pray & allow Islam to be practiced in their lands. Violence that leads to civil war almost always results in a much worse situation than the unjust ruler himself. While an unjust ruler is an evil in itself, the violence required to overthrow him is even worse✅️Hudhayfa ibnAlYaman reported The Messenger of Allah saidيَكُونُ بَعْدِي أَئِمَّةٌ لَا يَهْتَدُونَ بِهُدَايَ وَلَا يَسْتَنُّونَ بِسُنَّتِي وَسَيَقُومُ فِيهِمْ رِجَالٌ قُلُوبُهُمْ قُلُوبُ الشَّيَاطِينِ فِي جُثْمَانِ إِنْسٍ✅️Rulers after me will come who do not follow my guidance & my tradition (SUNNAH). Some of their men will have the hearts of devils in a human body‼️I said “O Messenger of Allah what should I do if I live to see that time?” The Prophet saidتَسْمَعُ وَتُطِيعُ لِلْأَمِيرِ وَإِنْ ضُرِبَ ظَهْرُكَ وَأُخِذَ مَالُكَ فَاسْمَعْ وَأَطِعْ✅️You should listen & obey them even if the ruler strikes your back & takes your wealth EVEN STILL LISTEN & OBEY✅️Sahih Muslim 1847✅️SAHIH✅️AwfIbnMalik reported: The Messenger of Allah saidخِيَارُ أَئِمَّتِكُمْ الَّذِينَ تُحِبُّونَهُمْ وَيُحِبُّونَكُمْ وَيُصَلُّونَ عَلَيْكُمْ وَتُصَلُّونَ عَلَيْهِمْ وَشِرَارُ أَئِمَّتِكُمْ الَّذِينَ تُبْغِضُونَهُمْ وَيُبْغِضُونَكُمْ وَتَلْعَنُونَهُمْ وَيَلْعَنُونَكُمْ✅️The best of your rulers are those whom you love & they love you, who pray for you & you pray for them. The worst of your rulers are those whom you hate & they hate you, whom you curse & they curse you✅️It was said “Shall we confront them with swords?” The Prophet saidلَا مَا أَقَامُوا فِيكُمْ الصَّلَاةَ وَإِذَا رَأَيْتُمْ مِنْ وُلَاتِكُمْ شَيْئًا تَكْرَهُونَهُ فَاكْرَهُوا عَمَلَهُ وَلَا تَنْزِعُوا يَدًا مِنْ طَاعَةٍ✅️No, as long as they establish prayer among you. If you find something hateful from them, you should hate their actions but not withdraw your hand from obedience✅️Sahih Muslim 1855✅️Sahih✅️UmmSalamah reported:The Messenger of Allah saidسَتَكُونُ أُمَرَاءُ فَتَعْرِفُونَ وَتُنْكِرُونَ فَمَنْ عَرَفَ بَرِئَ وَمَنْ أَنْكَرَ سَلِمَ وَلَكِنْ مَنْ رَضِيَ وَتَابَعَ✅️There will be rulers from whom you will see both goodness & corruption. One who recognizes their evil & hates it will maintain his innocence, but one who is pleased with it & follows them will be sinful✅️It was said “Shall we not fight them?” The Prophet saidلَا مَا صَلَّوْا✅️No‼️as long as they pray✅️Sahih Muslim 1854✅️Sahih✅️Many of those who call for violent rebellion have resorted to the use of terrorism against innocent civilians to destabilize the government🔥Such acts are completely forbidden in Islam. The Prophet severely warned those who engage in unlawful civil disobedience & acts of reckless & indiscriminate violence saying that they have nothing to do with Islam & will have died a death of ignorance✅️AbuHuraira reported The Messenger of Allah saidمَنْ خَرَجَ مِنَ الطَّاعَةِ وَفَارَقَ الْجَمَاعَةَ فَمَاتَ مَاتَ مِيتَةً جَاهِلِيَّةً وَمَنْ قَاتَلَ تَحْتَ رَايَةٍ عُمِّيَّةٍ يَغْضَبُ لِعَصَبَةٍ أَوْ يَدْعُو إِلَى عَصَبَةٍ أَوْ يَنْصُرُ عَصَبَةً فَقُتِلَ فَقِتْلَةٌ جَاهِلِيَّةٌ وَمَنْ خَرَجَ عَلَى أُمَّتِي يَضْرِبُ بَرَّهَا وَفَاجِرَهَا وَلاَ يَتَحَاشَ مِنْ مُؤْمِنِهَا وَلاَ يَفِي لِذِي عَهْدٍ عَهْدَهُ فَلَيْسَ مِنِّي وَلَسْتُ مِنْهُ✅️Whoever rejects obedience to the ruler & divides the community & dies will have died upon ignorance. Whoever fights under the banner of 1 who is blind, raging for the sake of tribalism or calling to tribalism or supporting tribalism & is killed will have died upon ignorance. Whoever rebels against my nation, striking the righteous & wicked alike & sparing not even the believers & does not fulfil the pledge of security, THEN HE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ME & I HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH HIM✅️Sahih Muslim 1848✅️Sahih✅️The righteous predecessors (al-salaf al-ṣāliḥ) recognized that the evil of violent rebellion is far worse than the evil of an unjust ruler himself. For this reason, they counseled patience & wisdom in the face of injustice. In fact they would pray for the ruler to be guided to righteousness, as the reform of the ruler would benefit the entire society✅️HasanAlBasri saidلَوْ أَنَّ النَّاسَ إِذَا ابْتُلُوا مِنْ قِبَلِ سُلْطَانِهِمْ صَبَرُوا مَا لَبِثُوا أَنْ يُفْرَجَ عَنْهُمْ وَلَكِنَّهُمْ يَجْزَعُونَ إِلَى السَّيْفِ فَيُوَكَّلُونَ إِلَيْهِ فَوَاللَّهِ مَا جَاءُوا بِيَوْمِ خَيْرٍ قَطُ✅️If the people had patience when they are being tested by their unjust ruler, it will not be long before Allah will give them a way out. However, they always rush to their swords, so they are left with their swords. By Allah, not even for a single day did they bring about any good✅️Source alṬabaqātAlKubra 8789✅️FudaylibnIyad saidلَوْ أَنَّ لِي دَعْوَةً مُسْتَجَابَةً مَا جَعَلْتُهَا إِلَّا فِي إِمَامٍ فَصَلَاحُ الْإِمَامِ صَلَاحُ الْبِلَادِ وَالْعِبَادِ✅️If I had 1 supplication to be answered, I would make it for no one but the ruler. If the ruler is righteous then it will lead to the righteousness of the country & the people✅️Source SiyarA’lam An-Nubula 8/434✅️AtTahawi saidوَلَا نَرَى الْخُرُوجَ عَلَى أَئِمَّتِنَا وَوُلَاةِ أُمُورِنَا وَإِنْ جَارُوا وَلَا نَدْعُو عَلَيْهِمْ وَلَا نَنْزِعُ يَدًا مِنْ طَاعَتِهِمْ وَنَرَى طَاعَتَهُمْ مِنْ طَاعَةِ اللَّهِ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ فَرِيضَةً مَا لَمْ يَأْمُرُوا بِمَعْصِيَةٍ وَنَدْعُو لَهُمْ بِالصَّلَاحِ وَالْمُعَافَاةِ✅️We do not recognize the rebellion against our leader or those in charge of our affairs even if they are unjust, nor do we wish evil for them, nor do we refuse to follow them. We hold that obedience to them is part of obedience to Allah the Exalted & therefore obligatory as long as they do not command us to commit sins. We pray for their right guidance & pardon✅️AlAqidahAlTahawiyyah_*
*_AhmadibnHanbal saidلَا يُتَعَرَّضُ بِالسُّلْطَانِ فَإِنَّ سَيْفَهُ مَسْلُولٌ✅️Do not confront the ruler, for his sword is unsheathed✅️Source JāmiAlUlūmwalḤikam 34✅️AnNawawi summarizes the views of the righteous predecessors sayingوَأَمَّا الْخُرُوجُ عَلَيْهِمْ وَقِتَالُهُمْ فَحَرَامٌ بِإِجْمَاعِ الْمُسْلِمِينَ وَإِنْ كَانُوا فَسَقَةً ظَالِمِينَ وَقَدْ تَظَاهَرَتِ الْأَحَادِيثُ بِمَعْنَى مَا ذَكَرْتُهُ وَأَجْمَعَ أَهْلُ السُّنَّةِ أَنَّهُ لَا يَنْعَزِلُ السُّلْطَانُ بِالْفِسْقِ وَأَمَّا الْوَجْهُ الْمَذْكُورُ فِي كُتُبِ الْفِقْهِ لِبَعْضِ أَصْحَابِنَا أَنَّهُ يَنْعَزِلُ وَحُكِيَ عَنِ الْمُعْتَزِلَةِ أَيْضًا فَغَلَطٌ مِنْ قَائِلِهِ مُخَالِفٌ لِلْإِجْمَاعِ قَالَ الْعُلَمَاءُ وَسَبَبُ عَدَمِ انْعِزَالِهِ وَتَحْرِيمِ الْخُرُوجِ عَلَيْهِ مَا يَتَرَتَّبُ عَلَى ذَلِكَ مِنَ الْفِتَنِ وَإِرَاقَةِ الدِّمَاءِ وَفَسَادِ ذَاتِ الْبَيْنِ فَتَكُونُ الْمَفْسَدَةُ فِي عَزْلِهِ أَكْثَرَ مِنْهَا فِي بَقَائِهِ✅️As for rebelling against the ruler & fighting him, it is forbidden by consensus of the Muslims even if he is sinful & oppressive‼️I have mentioned many narrations with this meaning✅️The people of the Sunnah have agreed that the ruler should not be removed due to his sinfulness. As for the view mentioned in the books of jurisprudence from some of our companions that he should be removed, which is also the opinion of the Mu’tazilites, then it is a serious mistake from them & is in opposition to the consensus. The scholars have said the reason his removal & rebellion against him is forbidden is because of what that entails of tribulations, bloodshed & corruption for the harm in removing the ruler is greater than letting him remain✅️Sahih Muslim 1840✅️Some Muslims claim that the narrations mentioned earlier forbidding rebellion against a Muslim ruler only apply to a ruler who “implements the Sharia” as they understand it. This is an unjustified restriction of the prophetic command that they have invented✅️Rather, the Prophet has forbidden violence even if “THEY STRIKE YOUR BACK & TAKE YOUR WEALTH” & “THEY DO NOT FOLLOW MY GUIDANCE OR TRADITION” & "THEY HAVE HEARTS OF DEVILS.” The only criterion the Prophet mentioned is that they allow the prayer✅️For this reason, Imam Muslim collected all of these narrations under the following chapter heading:وُجُوبِ الإِنْكَارِ عَلَى الأُمَرَاءِ فِيمَا يُخَالِفُ الشَّرْعَ وَتَرْكِ قِتَالِهِمْ مَا صَلَّوْا وَنَحْوِ ذَلِكَ✅️The obligation to denounce the rulers when they contradict the Sharia & to avoid fighting them as long as they pray & so on✅️To claim that the Sharia is a political system, the absence of which necessitates violence, is a modern innovation in the religion✅️Instead the proper way to enjoin good & forbid evil regarding the rulers is through non-violent preaching, advising✅️AhmadIbnHanbal saidالتَّغْيِيرُ بِالْيَدِ لَيْسَ بِالسَّيْفِ وَالسِّلَاحِ✅️Changing evil with one’s hand is NOT DONE with swords or weapons✅️Source Jamial Ulumwal Hikam 34✅️MUSLIMS MUST SINCERELY ADVISE THE RULER USING CALM & MEASURED SPEECH✅️ALLAH SENT MOSES & AARON ALAIHIMUSSALAM TO SPEAK TO PHARAOH GENTLY EVEN THOUGH HE WAS A GREAT TYRANT WHO CLAIMED TO BE GOD & ENSLAVED & MASSACRED THOUSANDS✅️Allah saidفَقُولَا لَهُ قَوْلًا لَّيِّنًا لَّعَلَّهُ يَتَذَكَّرُ أَوْ يَخْشَىٰ✅️Speak to him with mildly that perhaps he may be reminded or fear Allah✅️Quran 20:44✅️Moses & Aaron spoke to Pharaoh with the intention to guide him to the truth, not to condemn him to Hell. If this is how Allah asked his Prophets to speak to 1 of the worst tyrants the world has seen, then we should act the same in our situation✅️We must also have a good intention to benefit the ruler on a personal level, as part of the good will (nasiha) they should receive from us. We should advise them of their misdeeds in private only✅️IyadibnGhanam reported The Messenger of Allah saidمَنْ أَرَادَ أَنْ يَنْصَحَ لِسُلْطَانٍ بِأَمْرٍ فَلَا يُبْدِ لَهُ عَلَانِيَةً وَلَكِنْ لِيَأْخُذْ بِيَدِهِ فَيَخْلُوَ بِهِ فَإِنْ قَبِلَ مِنْهُ فَذَاكَ وَإِلَّا كَانَ قَدْ أَدَّى الَّذِي عَلَيْهِ لَهُ✅️Whoever intends to advise 1 with authority, then he should not do so publicly. Rather, he should take him by the hand & advise him in seclusion. If he accepts the advice, then all is well. If he does not accept it, then he has fulfilled his duty✅️Musnad Ahmad 14909✅️Sahih✅️ Even so it may be necessary to become more vocal & assertive if the ruler is a stubborn oppressor. Speaking the truth to him in this case is a form of non-violent jihād without weapons✅️AbuSaeedALKhudri reported The Messenger of Allah saidإِنَّ مِنْ أَعْظَمِ الْجِهَادِ كَلِمَةَ عَدْلٍ عِنْدَ سُلْطَانٍ جَائِر✅️Verily among the greatest jihād is a word of justice in front of a tyrannical ruler✅️Tirmidhī 2174✅️Sahih✅️Muslims should reform an unjust ruler & enjoin good without resorting to violence or destabilizing society✅️Violence & terrorism leads to the fracturing of Muslim society, which is even worse than the oppression of the rulers. Rather Muslims must be patient & wise in the face of injustice & we should pray for Allah to guide the rulers to right conduct✅️Allah knows best_*
May Allah bless you and all Muslims with his mercy and guidance and give us all the strength to follow Allah commands and worship him as he wanted us to! Amin!
Allahu akbar! It’s clear when someone is speaking from real knowledge. This is so beautiful. I have goosebumps, may Allah reward this brother and all of those striving to teach people the Haqq. May Allah protect us from misguidance.
When i first started practicing deen, I indiscriminately wanted to be wherever Allah was being mentioned and used to attend HT lectures. I am so grateful for the sister who advised me against it. Alhamdulilaah
Some of Hijab's content is good and some from Daniel too but are they knowledgeable in Islam? Not exactly. And it clearly shows. Would I take Islamic knowledge from the latter? No way. Simply because they haven't received their knowledge from scholars in Muslim countries. Quite frankly I don't think you should give them any attention or air time. Just do your videos and let them say whatever.
Aren’t you doing the same as Daniel calling him schizophrenic?
Daniel start attacking so he replay now
*People need to stop saying "discuss it in private". As Shaykh Muhamad said we are not concerned about what Daniel Haqiqatjou says as his words are not relevant, however what we are concerned about is the amount of Muslims that will become misguided and confused due to what Daniel Haqiqatjou is spreading.*
Exactly. Because of my lack of knowledge in this topic, I became confused after all this drama.. but this brother Muhammad made things clearer with clear proof from the Qur'an and the Hadith- as it should be- may Allah reward him and guide us all.
If you want counter Daniel then it would be best to engage with the points he raised in his hr long video. I still haven't seen 1 video where someone gave a rebuttal to his 6 questions. It's bot as though Daneil didn't make citations and references including audio. Insults won't make Daniel go away, in fact it will only make gis position more solid in the listeners. This brother is doing a disservice with his emotions
This is the knowledge Daniel Haqiqatjou is missing. The deep understanding of the Aqeedah of Ahlu Al Sunnah Wal Aljammah based on the Quran and the Sunnah and the understanding of the Salaf Al Saleh.
Exactly, he has a very poor knowledge in aqeedah. He said that the sifat of Allah is not an important subject. He is just like Ali Needs dawah . They both have never studied any books when it became to aqeedah, yet they are talking has if they are scholars or student of knowledge.
I have noticed some of the Harvard PhD muslims holders going off the path little by little
@@AISHAHALI05 it is because they are affected with the dieses of philosophies. You can watch the video dus dawah about how philosophy was introduced to the ummah by some individuals. It destroyed them .
The Messenger of Allah (salallāhu ‘alaihi wasallam) said: “If one of you sees something from the ruler that he hates, let him not publicise it.” This is a clear hadeeth forbidding openly protesting and publicly speaking against the ruler. Then he peace be upon him gave the Muslims a method of correcting the ruler: “Rather you should take the ruler by his hand into seclusion and advise him privately. If he accepts the advice, then that is good. If he refuses, then you have fulfilled your duty.” - Sahi Hadeeth reported by Imām Ahmad in al-Musnad 3/403 no. 15369, As-Sunnah of Ibn Abī ‘Āsim 3/102 no. 910.
Hudhayfa ibn al-Yaman reported: I asked, “O Messenger of Allah, we were living in an evil time and Allah brought us good in which we live now. Will there be evil after this good?” The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Yes.” I said, “And any good after this evil?” The Prophet said, “Yes.” I said, “And any evil after this good?” The Prophet said, “Yes.” I said, “How will it be?” The Prophet said, “Rulers after me will come who do not follow my guidance and my Sunnah. Some of their men will have the hearts of devils in a human body.” I said, “O Messenger of Allah, what should I do if I live to see that time?” The Prophet said, “You should listen and obey them, even if the ruler strikes your back and takes your wealth, even still listen and obey.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1847 Grade: Sahih (authentic)
According to Muslim عن حُذَيْفَة بْن الْيَمَانِ قُلْتُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ إِنَّا كُنَّا بِشَرٍّ فَجَاءَ اللَّهُ بِخَيْرٍ فَنَحْنُ فِيهِ فَهَلْ مِنْ وَرَاءِ هَذَا الْخَيْرِ شَرٌّ قَالَ نَعَمْ قُلْتُ هَلْ وَرَاءَ ذَلِكَ الشَّرِّ خَيْرٌ قَالَ نَعَمْ قُلْتُ فَهَلْ وَرَاءَ ذَلِكَ الْخَيْرِ شَرٌّ قَالَ نَعَمْ قُلْتُ كَيْفَ قَالَ يَكُونُ بَعْدِي أَئِمَّةٌ لَا يَهْتَدُونَ بِهُدَايَ وَلَا يَسْتَنُّونَ بِسُنَّتِي وَسَيَقُومُ فِيهِمْ رِجَالٌ قُلُوبُهُمْ قُلُوبُ الشَّيَاطِينِ فِي جُثْمَانِ إِنْسٍ قَالَ قُلْتُ كَيْفَ أَصْنَعُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ إِنْ أَدْرَكْتُ ذَلِكَ قَالَ تَسْمَعُ وَتُطِيعُ لِلْأَمِيرِ وَإِنْ ضُرِبَ ظَهْرُكَ وَأُخِذَ مَالُكَ فَاسْمَعْ وَأَطِعْ 1847 صحيح مسلم كتاب الإمارة باب وجوب ملازمة جماعة المسلمين عند ظهور الفتن
Awf ibn Malik reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “The best of your rulers are those whom you love and they love you, who pray for you and you pray for them. The worst of your rulers are those whom you hate and they hate you, whom you curse and they curse you.” It was said, “Shall we confront them with swords?” The Prophet said, “No, as long as they establish prayer among you. If you find something hateful from them, you should hate their actions but not withdraw your hand from obedience.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1855 Grade: Sahih (authentic)
According to Muslim عَنْ عَوْفِ بْنِ مَالِكٍ عَنْ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ قَالَ خِيَارُ أَئِمَّتِكُمْ الَّذِينَ تُحِبُّونَهُمْ وَيُحِبُّونَكُمْ وَيُصَلُّونَ عَلَيْكُمْ وَتُصَلُّونَ عَلَيْهِمْ وَشِرَارُ أَئِمَّتِكُمْ الَّذِينَ تُبْغِضُونَهُمْ وَيُبْغِضُونَكُمْ وَتَلْعَنُونَهُمْ وَيَلْعَنُونَكُمْ قِيلَ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ أَفَلَا نُنَابِذُهُمْ بِالسَّيْفِ فَقَالَ لَا مَا أَقَامُوا فِيكُمْ الصَّلَاةَ وَإِذَا رَأَيْتُمْ مِنْ وُلَاتِكُمْ شَيْئًا تَكْرَهُونَهُ فَاكْرَهُوا عَمَلَهُ وَلَا تَنْزِعُوا يَدًا مِنْ طَاعَةٍ 1855 صحيح مسلم كتاب الإمارة باب خيار الأئمة وشرارهم
And this Hadith goes in line with the statement of Sahl ibn Abdillah at tustari Rahimahullah , The wisdom behind these traditions is that violent rebellion, which is civil war, is almost certainly worse than the oppression of any government ruler. The long track-record of failed rebellions and harmful civil wars has led latter scholars to achieve consensus on the prohibition of insurrection. Stated Imaam Barbahaaree in Sharh us-Sunnah: "If you find a man making supplication against the ruler, know that he is a person of innovation. If you find a person making supplication for the ruler to be upright, know that he is a person of the Sunnah, if Allaah wills. Fudayl ibn 'Iyaad said, ''If I had an invocation which was to be answered, I would not make it except for the ruler.'' It was said to him, ''O Abu 'Alee, explain that to us,'' he replied, ''If I were to make an invocation for myself, it would not go beyond me. Whereas if I make it for the ruler, he is corrected and through that, the servants and the land are set in order.'' We are ordered to make supplication for them (ie. the rulers) to be upright. We have not been ordered to make supplication against them, even if they commit tyranny and oppression, since their tyranny and oppression reflect only upon themselves but their rectitude is good for themselves and the Muslims."....................
***
if what you say is true about Daniel why not debate publically?
Daniel had the chance to defend his position when he was challenged by Karim abu zaid publicly, but he cowered.
He became like a parrot repiting word and loghfing
For the reasons that Daniel has explained in his video. Madkhalis will never accept a live debate since they know that they'd risk getting called out on their bs.
This is actually pathetic. Unsubscribed for dodging all of Daniels questions and mischaracterizing his positions.
Go ahead . No one need you
the way of the Salaf is always beautiful
Indeed
I didn’t notice any important thing you said.
In fact DH is more consistent
I keep seeing changes in opinions overtime.
First your group say don't criticize the rulers at all
then they say criticize the actions but don't mention the ruler's name
and now you say criticize the ruler only if you are a major Muslim scholar.
What are your proofs for all these different opinions? Show us as Daniel showed us his proofs and then it can be clear who is right and who is wrong.
Also, I want to know why you didn't criticize Daniel when he criticized Qatar, Morrocco, and Algeria many times and you only criticized him when he talked about Saudi Arabia. it appears that the issue you have with him is not whether you criticize the ruler or not but rather who you criticize.
May Allah protect us from misinformation
we should stay unbiased, and have good akhlaq
Daniel provided so much evidence in his videos from the salaf AND scholars like ibn Tahmiyyah, Ibn Baz and Albani. You all just seem to be completely ignoring that part of the video
@@WeeNat313 How to Advise the Muslim Rulers & How Not To Advise the Muslim Rulers According to the Quran & Sunnah (Part 1)
Advising the Muslim Rulers is one of the most important matters of the religion it is so important in Islam that the prophet Mohammed said, “Three things that the heart of a Muslim will not despise (does not have any hatred in his heart for):making the action sincerely for Allah, advising the leaders of the Muslims, and holding fast to their jamaah.” Ibn Maajah, Authenticated by Shaykh al-Albaanee.
Advising the Muslim Rulers can lead to great benefits for the ruler himself and the ummah as a whole when done properly.
However if advising the ruler is not done according to the Quran and Sunnah it can also lead to great harm and oppression from the rulers upon the ummah in general and if there is no caliph, the oppression will be direct to the ruler’s subjects of his state.
Today we live in a time where many of the laymen have entered into the area of sincerely advising the Muslim rulers of today. This is great and should lead to a great overall benefit but instead it has lead to oppression from the Muslim rulers.
The reason why this has happened is because many of those who advice the Muslim rulers of today are laymen who have are takfire so they do not or those influenced by the takfire dawah. So their intention is for the sake of Allah when advising the ruler and they wish to bring about good through their actions however they are ignorant of the correct methodology in advising the Muslim ruler. Therefore they often advise the ruler in a way that contradicts the shariah and often leads to evil and rarely leads to any benefit.
Shaykh Ahmad Bazmool clarified the different ways of advising the rulers in his book titled ‘As-Sunnah in that which is connected to the one in charge of the affairs.’ Al-Ma’loom min Waajib il-‘Ilaaqah bain al-Haakim wal-Mahkoom, (pp.22-23).
After the shaykhs points in between the brackets are some extra points or info from ME (ABDUL KAREEM IBN OZZIE, NOT THE SHAYKH), to make it easier to understand the shaykhs advice inshallah.
The shaykh said: 1. Advising the leader in a secret/private manner that’s between the leader and the one advising.
As for the first manner of giving advice to the leader, it is when it is done privately. This is a foundation from the foundations of the methodology of the salaf, which the people of desire and innovation have opposed like the Khawarij and others. This is based upon that which is on the authority of I’yaad (bin Ghanam) that the Prophet said:
“Whoever wants to advise a sultan (leader/ruler) with a matter, do not do it outwardly but let him take him by the hand and go into seclusion with him. If he accepts it from him then that (is good) and if not then he (the adviser) has fulfilled that which was upon him (to do).” Musnad of Ahmad, as-Sunnah of Ibn Abee Aa’sim, authenticated by al-Albaanee.
(In the above hadeeth the prophet said “If he (the ruler) accepts it (the advice) from him (the ruler’s subject) then that (is good) and if not then he (the adviser) has fulfilled that which was upon him (to do)”.
Therefore if a person gives a Muslim ruler advice and he does not accept his advice leave him alone, this is because if he rejects the sincere advice then ultimately the ruler is responsible for his rulership and Allah will hold him accountable for it.
The prophet said, “If the ruler orders people with righteousness and rules justly, then he will be rewarded for that, and if he does the opposite, he will be responsible for that (his rulership).” Recoded by Bukhari.
The Messenger of Allah said, “Hear and obey, for they will bear responsibility for that entrusted to them (ruling over Allahs servants), and you for that entrusted to you (hearing and obeying the ruler and advising him sincerely)”. Recorded by Muslim
So the responsibility Allah has given the Muslim ummah in regards to the Muslim rulers is that we give them the bay’ah (pledge of allegiance) to hear and obey him in what they like and dislike to the best of their abilities and to advice the leader secretly and sincerely for Allahs sake. If a Muslim does this he has fulfilled that which was upon him to do.
However even if he ruler rejects the advice the person still has fulfilled that which was upon him to do. Thus when some of the takfires or those affected by their dawah claims they are calling for armed revolt or demonstrations or they are involved in both or either due to the Muslim ruler not accepting the ummahs advice to rule only by Allahs law these actions are haram. As these actions contradict what the prophet speech as the prophet said“If he (the ruler) accepts it (the advice) from him (the ruler’s subject) then that (is good) and if not then he (the adviser) has fulfilled that which was upon him (to do)”.
The prophet Mohammed did not say if the ruler accepts the advice then that is good and if not then the adviser has to call for armed revolt or demonstrations or be involved in both or either has fulfilled that which was upon him to do.
Calling for armed revolt or demonstrations or be involved in both or either only leads to more haram than then the rules bad rule as the other actions will lead to more blood shed between the Muslims, hatred among Muslims and disunity in that Muslim state all of which is haram in the shariah.
Shaykh Abdul-Muhsin bin Naasir al-Ubaykaan used to be with the Qutbiyyah in the early 1990’s. The Qutbiyyeen would shower praises upon him, accompany him and frequent his mosque in large numbers. He said: “in the past, I expressed my opinion in public; I now believe that public denunciations are a mistake, both on a religious and rational level. I continue, however, to give advice to and discuss matters with those in power, in private.”)
On the authority of Shaqeeq that it was said to Usaamah bin Zayd: quote: “Will you not enter upon Uthmaan and talk to him?” So he (Usaamah bin Zayd) said: “Do you see that I don’t talk to him except that I make you to hear (what I say to him)? By Allaah I have spoken to him in manner which was between me and him without opening an affair that I do not love to be the first one to open it.” Recorded in Bukhari 3267.
In this narration, we see that the advise given out in the open is an evil affair which will result in their being turmoil. Also we see that giving the advise privately is the origin in which the advise can be completed without their being turmoil.
(Advising the leader in a secret is a means of giving the Muslim ruler sincere advice for the sake of Allah as no is watching you and it is from themost excellent Jihad.
Indeed the Messenger of Allah said: “The most excellent Jihad is a truthful word spoken to an oppressive ruler.” The hadeeth was related by Ibn Maajah (no. 4012), and Ahmad (5/251); and it was authenticated by Shaykh al-Albaanee in Saheehul-Jaami’ (no. 1100).
Note how this most excellent Jihad takes a real man (i.e. brave person not a coward) to undertake it as it can not be achieved by hiding behind others and talking about the Muslim ruler behind his back in the streets, masjids, gathering of friends or family, lessons, on the net, on TV it can only be achieved by speaking to ruler directly in secret and then keeping the conversation secret.
This most excellent jihad can also be achieved inshallah by using any other means of communicating with the leader only like emailing his office, a letter to his office or phoning his office etc and Allah knows best.
Advising the leader in is secret also a way of implementing part of the prophets saying, when the prophet said, “The Deen is Naseehah (Sincerity/Advice).”We (The companions) said: “For who?” The Prophet said: “For Allaah, His book, His messenger, the leaders of the Muslims and their common folk.” (Muslim)
Imam An-Nawawee said “Sincerity to the Leaders is to help them upon the truth. To obey them in it, to order them with it, to remind and advise them with kindness and gentleness (does not include backbiting, slandering or name calling the Muslim ruler), to remind them of that which they are heedless and neglectful of, to help them fulfil those rights of the Muslims that have not reached them yet. Not to rebel against them and to enamour the hearts of the people with obedience to them.”
Imam al-Khattaabee said “From sincerity to them is Prayer behind them, Jihad along with them (not jihad against them), to give the zakat (charity) to them, and not to rebel against them(the Muslim rulers) with the sword when injustice or bad treatment appears from them (the Muslim rulers). And that they are not praised with false praises, and that duaa (supplication) is made for their righteousness.
(Fudayl Ibn Iyaad (d.187H) said, “If I had a supplication that would be answered, I would not make it, except for the ruler. Because when the ruler becomes righteous, the towns and the servants become safe and secure.” Refer to Hilyatul-Awliyaa (8/91-92).
Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal (d.241H) said, “Verily I supplicate for the ruler, for his correctness, success and support - night and day - and I see this as being obligatory upon me.’’ Refer to as-Sunnah (no. 14) of Aboo Bakr al-Khallaal.
Imam Al-Barbahari states, “If you see a man supplicating against the ruler, know that he is a person of desire (meaning a person from Ahlu Bidah), and if you see a man supplicating for the ruler, know that he is a Sunni (meaning from Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaah) inshallah.” (Sharh Al-Sunnah p113, 114))
(Copied from www,thekhalids.org)
@@WeeNat313 (Imam al-Khattaabee continues) All of this is based upon the fact that what is meant by the leader of the Muslims is the Caliph and other than him from the administrators who take charge of the affairs of the Muslims.”
Also Shaykh Abu Nu’aym al-Asbahaanee said, “Whoever advises the leaders and the rulers is guided, and whoever deceives them is misguided and has transgressed the bounds.”)
2. Advising the leader in front of the people outwardly in his presence while having the ability to advise him privately.
This is exposing (of the faults) and not advice (in reality). It is prohibited for the following reasons:
1. It opposes the hadeeth of I’yaad bin Ghanam.
(The Prophet said, “Whoever wants to advise a sultan (leader/ruler) with a matter, do not do it outwardly but let him take him by the hand and go into seclusion with him. If he accepts it from him then that (is good) and if not then he (the adviser) has fulfilled that which was upon him (to do).” Musnad of Ahmad, as-Sunnah of Ibn Abee Aa’sim, authenticated by al-Albaanee.)
2. It opposes the narrations of the salaf, as well as their methodology like we have seen in the narration of Usaamah bin Zayd (may Allaah be pleased with them both).
(The narration is: “Will you not enter upon Uthmaan and talk to him?” So he (Usaamah bin Zayd) said: “Do you see that I don’t talk to him except that I make you to hear (what I say to him)? By Allaah I have spoken to him in manner which was between me and him without opening an affair that I do not love to be the first one to open it.” Recorded in Bukhari 3267
From the salaf - In Aqeedah at-Tahawiyah of Imam Tahawi it says
“When changing the evil of the rulers, then this should be done by the scholars and not openly as is mentioned by a clear Ahaadeeth of the Prophet “When you wish to correct the sultan then take him by the hand in secret and advise him.”” The full length version of this hadeeth was reported by Ahmad (3/403) and Ibn Abee ‘Aasim in Kitaabus-Sunnah (2/251): ‘‘Chapter: How are the leaders of the common-folk to be advised?’’ (2/521) with a Saheeh isnad and it was authenticated by Shaykh al-Albaanee in Dhilaalul-Jannah fee Takhreejis-Sunnah (no. 1096))
3. It opposes the statement of the Prophet.
(The prophet said) “Whoever disgraced the ruler of Allah (by backbiting, slandering (lying) or twisting the truth about him) in the earth, Allaah will disgrace him.” at-Tirmidhee, authenticated by Imaam al-Albaanee
(In addition the story of Ibn Aamir when he was the Muslim ruler shows the impermissibility of disgracing the leader.
Once when Ibn Aamir was delivering a sermon and he was wearing a fine garment. So Abu Bilaal said ‘Look at our ruler wearing the garment of the sinners!’ So Abu Bakrah said ‘Be Silent!! I heard the Messenger of Allah say ” Whoever sends scorn upon the one whom Allah has given rulership to upon the earth, Allah will scorn him.’hasan by Shaykh Albaani in Ibn Abee Asim’s As Sunnah)
(Copied from www,thekhalids.org)
@@WeeNat313 Daniel has a deviant understanding of the topic.
*I don't think people understand how dangerous what Daniel Haqiqatjou is doing.*
*He's literally taking hadith out of context and giving his own interpretation to push his own agendas. And as a result is misguiding many Muslims in the process.*
1. I truly dislike your calling DH a "schizophreniac / jahel". (and DH calling you back as "bootlicker")
2. Do an open discussion. This refuting and re-refuting do the ummah no good at large!
I didn't like the name calling but same can be said for Daniel who initiated it
Imam al-Tabarani:
And some of the (salaf) said:
Rulers should be condemned "publicly" and however possible for their Munkar (evil act)
It is (the opinion) narrated of Omar ibn al khattab and obay ibn k'ab.
Sharh Saheeh Al-Bukhari - Ibn Battal (10/50)
15:40 What is permissible to sheikh ibn Taymiyya not permissible to Daniel or to other persons? How that works Islamically?
Watch full, he has explained that. If sheikh Albani can grade hadeeses can Daniel too be allowed to do that?? No right? Daniel is not an Ulema, it's not for laymen to go make Takfir!
@@abdulbasith5152 bro where exactly did daniel do a takfir?
Th you talkin about?
Apparently madkhalis aren't just bootlickers, they're also innovators. Inventing new rules into the religion like "only person x can openly criticize the ruler".
@@elite7329 Mr ulema may I know your qualification please? I hope you are a qualified ulema to shed light on this
Best thing about Islam .. No one can make up things as they go, based on their own interpretations .
May Allah reward you both for all the effort.
Edit : If you are not a scholar then you should stick with the SCHOLARS CONSENSUS around the world who are following Quraan and Sunnah, your own understanding or whatever sect/ group / youtube channel you follow can lead to bloodshed and you will be held accountable in front of Allah swt for any muslim killed in the chaos . ( many examples around you ) .
Half knowledge is as dangerous as no knowledge at all .
But we don't go with our interpretations
We go with the understanding of the righteous predecessors
Ameen
The Messenger of Allah (salallāhu ‘alaihi wasallam) said: “If one of you sees something from the ruler that he hates, let him not publicise it.” This is a clear hadeeth forbidding openly protesting and publicly speaking against the ruler. Then he peace be upon him gave the Muslims a method of correcting the ruler: “Rather you should take the ruler by his hand into seclusion and advise him privately. If he accepts the advice, then that is good. If he refuses, then you have fulfilled your duty.” - Sahi Hadeeth reported by Imām Ahmad in al-Musnad 3/403 no. 15369, As-Sunnah of Ibn Abī ‘Āsim 3/102 no. 910.
Hudhayfa ibn al-Yaman reported: I asked, “O Messenger of Allah, we were living in an evil time and Allah brought us good in which we live now. Will there be evil after this good?” The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Yes.” I said, “And any good after this evil?” The Prophet said, “Yes.” I said, “And any evil after this good?” The Prophet said, “Yes.” I said, “How will it be?” The Prophet said, “Rulers after me will come who do not follow my guidance and my Sunnah. Some of their men will have the hearts of devils in a human body.” I said, “O Messenger of Allah, what should I do if I live to see that time?” The Prophet said, “You should listen and obey them, even if the ruler strikes your back and takes your wealth, even still listen and obey.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1847 Grade: Sahih (authentic)
According to Muslim عن حُذَيْفَة بْن الْيَمَانِ قُلْتُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ إِنَّا كُنَّا بِشَرٍّ فَجَاءَ اللَّهُ بِخَيْرٍ فَنَحْنُ فِيهِ فَهَلْ مِنْ وَرَاءِ هَذَا الْخَيْرِ شَرٌّ قَالَ نَعَمْ قُلْتُ هَلْ وَرَاءَ ذَلِكَ الشَّرِّ خَيْرٌ قَالَ نَعَمْ قُلْتُ فَهَلْ وَرَاءَ ذَلِكَ الْخَيْرِ شَرٌّ قَالَ نَعَمْ قُلْتُ كَيْفَ قَالَ يَكُونُ بَعْدِي أَئِمَّةٌ لَا يَهْتَدُونَ بِهُدَايَ وَلَا يَسْتَنُّونَ بِسُنَّتِي وَسَيَقُومُ فِيهِمْ رِجَالٌ قُلُوبُهُمْ قُلُوبُ الشَّيَاطِينِ فِي جُثْمَانِ إِنْسٍ قَالَ قُلْتُ كَيْفَ أَصْنَعُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ إِنْ أَدْرَكْتُ ذَلِكَ قَالَ تَسْمَعُ وَتُطِيعُ لِلْأَمِيرِ وَإِنْ ضُرِبَ ظَهْرُكَ وَأُخِذَ مَالُكَ فَاسْمَعْ وَأَطِعْ 1847 صحيح مسلم كتاب الإمارة باب وجوب ملازمة جماعة المسلمين عند ظهور الفتن
Awf ibn Malik reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “The best of your rulers are those whom you love and they love you, who pray for you and you pray for them. The worst of your rulers are those whom you hate and they hate you, whom you curse and they curse you.” It was said, “Shall we confront them with swords?” The Prophet said, “No, as long as they establish prayer among you. If you find something hateful from them, you should hate their actions but not withdraw your hand from obedience.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1855 Grade: Sahih (authentic)
According to Muslim عَنْ عَوْفِ بْنِ مَالِكٍ عَنْ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ قَالَ خِيَارُ أَئِمَّتِكُمْ الَّذِينَ تُحِبُّونَهُمْ وَيُحِبُّونَكُمْ وَيُصَلُّونَ عَلَيْكُمْ وَتُصَلُّونَ عَلَيْهِمْ وَشِرَارُ أَئِمَّتِكُمْ الَّذِينَ تُبْغِضُونَهُمْ وَيُبْغِضُونَكُمْ وَتَلْعَنُونَهُمْ وَيَلْعَنُونَكُمْ قِيلَ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ أَفَلَا نُنَابِذُهُمْ بِالسَّيْفِ فَقَالَ لَا مَا أَقَامُوا فِيكُمْ الصَّلَاةَ وَإِذَا رَأَيْتُمْ مِنْ وُلَاتِكُمْ شَيْئًا تَكْرَهُونَهُ فَاكْرَهُوا عَمَلَهُ وَلَا تَنْزِعُوا يَدًا مِنْ طَاعَةٍ 1855 صحيح مسلم كتاب الإمارة باب خيار الأئمة وشرارهم
And this Hadith goes in line with the statement of Sahl ibn Abdillah at tustari Rahimahullah , The wisdom behind these traditions is that violent rebellion, which is civil war, is almost certainly worse than the oppression of any government ruler. The long track-record of failed rebellions and harmful civil wars has led latter scholars to achieve consensus on the prohibition of insurrection. Stated Imaam Barbahaaree in Sharh us-Sunnah: "If you find a man making supplication against the ruler, know that he is a person of innovation. If you find a person making supplication for the ruler to be upright, know that he is a person of the Sunnah, if Allaah wills. Fudayl ibn 'Iyaad said, ''If I had an invocation which was to be answered, I would not make it except for the ruler.'' It was said to him, ''O Abu 'Alee, explain that to us,'' he replied, ''If I were to make an invocation for myself, it would not go beyond me. Whereas if I make it for the ruler, he is corrected and through that, the servants and the land are set in order.'' We are ordered to make supplication for them (ie. the rulers) to be upright. We have not been ordered to make supplication against them, even if they commit tyranny and oppression, since their tyranny and oppression reflect only upon themselves but their rectitude is good for themselves and the Muslims."....................
Hadith on Rulers: Advising the Muslim leader in private
Abu Wa’il reported: It was said to Usamah ibn Yazid, may Allah be pleased with him, “Have you not spoken to Uthman?” Usamah said, “You think I have not spoken to him unless you heard it? I have certainly spoken to him in the matter between us without bringing it up. I do not like to be the first to bring it up.”
Source: Musnad Aḥmad 21784
Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Arna’ut
عَنْ أَبِي وَائِلٍ قَالَ قِيلَ لِأُسَامَةَ بن زيد رضي الله عنه أَلَا تُكَلِّمُ عُثْمَانَ فَقَالَ إِنَّكُمْ تَرَوْنَ أَنْ لَا أُكَلِّمَهُ إِلَّا سَمْعَكُمْ إِنِّي لَأُكَلِّمُهُ فِيمَا بَيْنِي وَبَيْنَهُ مَا دُونَ أَنْ أَفْتَتِحَ أَمْرًا لَا أُحِبُّ أَنْ أَكُونَ أَوَّلَ مَنْ افْتَتَحَهُ
21784 مسند أحمد
36/117 المحدث شعيب الأرناؤوط خلاصة حكم المحدث إسناده صحيح على شرط الشيخين في تخريج المسند
Alhamdulellah
Sheikh Saleh Al Fawzan was threatened a lot by ISIS and Alqaeda supporters trying to make him condemn the rulers publicly. He refused because he follows Sunnah. May Allah bless Saleh Al Fawzan.
@@assadsalah4296
Because the rulers subject is very sensitive. Why you insist in unfollowing the prophet ?
The prophet peace be upon him said: obey your ruler even if he flogs you and take your money.
The prophet peace be upon him said: advice your ruler privately. Take him by the hand alone. If he listens to you it’s good and if he doesn’t go back.
Islam says that Muslims are more precious than the whole creation.
Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him even said that Muslims are more precious than the Ka’aba.
If you disobey the ruler and cause revolution you will be responsible for the death of Millions. (Like what’s happening now in Syria, Yemen, Lybia, Tunisia, and Egypt).
Are you better than the prophet ?
NO
So much ego and so little restraint among these so called scholars.
I do not understand why starting your video by calling daniel stupid. You could have answered the question with labeling him. This is not the way of salaf. I will stop the video here at the very beginging and go listen to something else
This video is very important. I was siding with Daniel then I saw this and was blown alway how well you explained the stance from the way of the salaf
Daniel needs to learn more before giving fotowa.
The Messenger of Allah (salallāhu ‘alaihi wasallam) said: “If one of you sees something from the ruler that he hates, let him not publicise it.” This is a clear hadeeth forbidding openly protesting and publicly speaking against the ruler. Then he peace be upon him gave the Muslims a method of correcting the ruler: “Rather you should take the ruler by his hand into seclusion and advise him privately. If he accepts the advice, then that is good. If he refuses, then you have fulfilled your duty.” - Sahi Hadeeth reported by Imām Ahmad in al-Musnad 3/403 no. 15369, As-Sunnah of Ibn Abī ‘Āsim 3/102 no. 910.
Hudhayfa ibn al-Yaman reported: I asked, “O Messenger of Allah, we were living in an evil time and Allah brought us good in which we live now. Will there be evil after this good?” The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Yes.” I said, “And any good after this evil?” The Prophet said, “Yes.” I said, “And any evil after this good?” The Prophet said, “Yes.” I said, “How will it be?” The Prophet said, “Rulers after me will come who do not follow my guidance and my Sunnah. Some of their men will have the hearts of devils in a human body.” I said, “O Messenger of Allah, what should I do if I live to see that time?” The Prophet said, “You should listen and obey them, even if the ruler strikes your back and takes your wealth, even still listen and obey.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1847 Grade: Sahih (authentic)
According to Muslim عن حُذَيْفَة بْن الْيَمَانِ قُلْتُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ إِنَّا كُنَّا بِشَرٍّ فَجَاءَ اللَّهُ بِخَيْرٍ فَنَحْنُ فِيهِ فَهَلْ مِنْ وَرَاءِ هَذَا الْخَيْرِ شَرٌّ قَالَ نَعَمْ قُلْتُ هَلْ وَرَاءَ ذَلِكَ الشَّرِّ خَيْرٌ قَالَ نَعَمْ قُلْتُ فَهَلْ وَرَاءَ ذَلِكَ الْخَيْرِ شَرٌّ قَالَ نَعَمْ قُلْتُ كَيْفَ قَالَ يَكُونُ بَعْدِي أَئِمَّةٌ لَا يَهْتَدُونَ بِهُدَايَ وَلَا يَسْتَنُّونَ بِسُنَّتِي وَسَيَقُومُ فِيهِمْ رِجَالٌ قُلُوبُهُمْ قُلُوبُ الشَّيَاطِينِ فِي جُثْمَانِ إِنْسٍ قَالَ قُلْتُ كَيْفَ أَصْنَعُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ إِنْ أَدْرَكْتُ ذَلِكَ قَالَ تَسْمَعُ وَتُطِيعُ لِلْأَمِيرِ وَإِنْ ضُرِبَ ظَهْرُكَ وَأُخِذَ مَالُكَ فَاسْمَعْ وَأَطِعْ 1847 صحيح مسلم كتاب الإمارة باب وجوب ملازمة جماعة المسلمين عند ظهور الفتن
Awf ibn Malik reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “The best of your rulers are those whom you love and they love you, who pray for you and you pray for them. The worst of your rulers are those whom you hate and they hate you, whom you curse and they curse you.” It was said, “Shall we confront them with swords?” The Prophet said, “No, as long as they establish prayer among you. If you find something hateful from them, you should hate their actions but not withdraw your hand from obedience.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1855 Grade: Sahih (authentic)
According to Muslim عَنْ عَوْفِ بْنِ مَالِكٍ عَنْ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ قَالَ خِيَارُ أَئِمَّتِكُمْ الَّذِينَ تُحِبُّونَهُمْ وَيُحِبُّونَكُمْ وَيُصَلُّونَ عَلَيْكُمْ وَتُصَلُّونَ عَلَيْهِمْ وَشِرَارُ أَئِمَّتِكُمْ الَّذِينَ تُبْغِضُونَهُمْ وَيُبْغِضُونَكُمْ وَتَلْعَنُونَهُمْ وَيَلْعَنُونَكُمْ قِيلَ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ أَفَلَا نُنَابِذُهُمْ بِالسَّيْفِ فَقَالَ لَا مَا أَقَامُوا فِيكُمْ الصَّلَاةَ وَإِذَا رَأَيْتُمْ مِنْ وُلَاتِكُمْ شَيْئًا تَكْرَهُونَهُ فَاكْرَهُوا عَمَلَهُ وَلَا تَنْزِعُوا يَدًا مِنْ طَاعَةٍ 1855 صحيح مسلم كتاب الإمارة باب خيار الأئمة وشرارهم
And this Hadith goes in line with the statement of Sahl ibn Abdillah at tustari Rahimahullah , The wisdom behind these traditions is that violent rebellion, which is civil war, is almost certainly worse than the oppression of any government ruler. The long track-record of failed rebellions and harmful civil wars has led latter scholars to achieve consensus on the prohibition of insurrection. Stated Imaam Barbahaaree in Sharh us-Sunnah: "If you find a man making supplication against the ruler, know that he is a person of innovation. If you find a person making supplication for the ruler to be upright, know that he is a person of the Sunnah, if Allaah wills. Fudayl ibn 'Iyaad said, ''If I had an invocation which was to be answered, I would not make it except for the ruler.'' It was said to him, ''O Abu 'Alee, explain that to us,'' he replied, ''If I were to make an invocation for myself, it would not go beyond me. Whereas if I make it for the ruler, he is corrected and through that, the servants and the land are set in order.'' We are ordered to make supplication for them (ie. the rulers) to be upright. We have not been ordered to make supplication against them, even if they commit tyranny and oppression, since their tyranny and oppression reflect only upon themselves but their rectitude is good for themselves and the Muslims."....................
*****
This video didn't answered daniels questions,
Bro let’s get it in simple and clear words, if you support whoever is friends with “Israel” then get your empty words outta here, if you stand with Muslim brotherhood and Holy Land of Palestine then i d die for ya without u saying a word
Too many bots in these comments
المداخلة آفة المسلمين في هذا الزمن .. هداهم الله
I love that video,. full of knowledge. Barak Allah Feekom Saajid Lipham and Muhammad James Sutton. 🥰
lol... full of -knowledge- khurafat. Saajid Lipham and Muhammad James Sutton are 🥾👅
Asc,if you want to condemn someone you should condemn saudi establishment & the rest of golf countries unless you defending it by attacking Daniel ,Iam sick & tired of most sheikh’s deflecting attention from the real problem ummah got today
This also highlights the importance of learning aqeedah and continuously seek knowledge. May Allah reward you abundantly. Baarakallahu feekum!
@@d.bcooper2271 your Dan H. has supported ls & AI Q imams who worked with yeah-hood, just allow me to intro my name... you dishonest... & Morsi called to democracy, so based on your Dh cariji idea its ok though right? be honest and don't divide believers.
@@d.bcooper2271 you quote WlKl & spam Dan H who's known to be a kathib & per jar wa tadil isn't be reliable...
have haya..., Salafis like Sh. Anjari have said Muslims should reject curuj to Erdogan & in general, watch NasirAlHanbali on this.
May الله تعالى reward brother Muhammad James Sutton and preserve him and brother Saajid. May Allaah taaala guide brother Daniel
Aamiin
امين
Ameen
@@d.bcooper2271 It's not based on any authentic information that you've mentioned here.
Pursuit of The Truth who is not recognizing that here? If a scholar was wrongfully imprisoned we ask Allaah taalaa to free him from jail and reward him for the harms he had to endure. It seems as if someone blanket calls anyone who goes against khurooj as a bootlicker or madkhali these days. Rabee al madlhali made takfeer of rulers outside saudi and was criticized by some scholars in Yemen for that. Also our salafi imams muqbil al waadiee rahimahullaa was imprisoned too for a time unjustly. We should be careful to not blanket label and whom we associate with as the brother said there are many subsects amongst khawaarij and ahl al bidah
Mashallah brother Saajid hasn’t grown only in knowledge but also in age.
😂
😂😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
😂
U're calling br james old لول
دانيال من الإخوة الفضلاء الذين خدموا السنة
وعلموا الناس الخير، نحسبه كذلك والله حسيبه ولا نزكي على الله أحداً، والله يحفظه ويحميه من كيد وشر المداخلة والجامية
يابو زهرة والله ماعندك سالفة للاسف. فرق بين السماء والارض، دانيا حتى شهادة في علوم الدين ماعنده. تخيل شخص كان شيعي سني ومر على كل المذاهب يجي يتكلم في موضوع فقهي مثل موضوع الخروج على ولي الامر. ترى جاسين يدافعون عنك وعن حكامك فلا تصير اهبل تجي تطبل لواحد منحرف مثل دانيال. مو عشانه سوا كم مناظرة مع غير مسلم يعنيي انه على حق في اطروحاته الاخرى خصوصا عندما تتلعق بالعقيدة.
this is getting annoying. why you'll are saying daniel is calling for khuruj? be honest, did you watch his madhkhalis video?
Sheikh people(ulamas) have spoken up against things in middle east but they get thrown in prison for many years. They can't even open their mouth. If they do they know they will be thrown into prison like others so most of them are scared to even oppose them or their actions even without naming them.
You fellows are not leaving any choice. If those ulama who speak up get thrown in prison and you fellows are queit and supporting these crooks and suppressing anyone who speaks against them, what choice do you leave people with.
You fellows are just using religion as a tool to shield these crooks and their actions.
This is what it looks like when you have proper knowledge and foundation. Allahuma barik.
@@d.bcooper2271 Stop spamming
The Students of Knowledge need to rectify the misguidance that's being spread on internet. It's necessary.
These kids on comment section, they don't know any better, most of them are teenagers or in their early twenties, they don't even study under The Ulama.
جزاك الله خيراً يا شيخ
Haqq
السلام عليكم،
انا فقط اتابع الحوار و لكني حتى الساعة محتار. يبدو أن الأخ اعترض على نصائح دانيال للحكام العرب علنا فقط لانه ليس اهلا لذلك، اذا يبدو أنه من الجائز فعل ذلك لكن بمؤهلات علمية؟ مثال ذلك الشيخ ابن تيمية؟
ثم بعد ذلك، مازلت محتارا في أمر تعبير الناس عن استيائهم من بعض سياسات الحكومات. مثلا هل يجوز لي التعبير عن استيائي اذا قامت حكومة دولتي بقرار غاصب؟ هل للناس الحق في التكلم في ذلك بينهم و التعبير عن استيائهم؟
ثم اريد رأيك في قضية عملية، مثلا حاليا في المملكة السعودية نحن نرى جهارا نهارا كيف أن الحكومة تريد أن تنشر التحرر بين الناس بإقامة الحفلات و دعوة من هب و دب من المغنين و الفسقة، هل يحق لنا أن نشير إلى هاته الأفعال على أنها غير مقبولة ام فقط نقبل و نغلق افواهنا؟
33 minute video and comments from after being up for less than 5 minutes saying the entire video is wrong, the liars expose themselves without even knowing, they do not care for the truth as they’ve already heard what they want from Daniel, I will listen to this before passing judgement
Lol even I can debunk his inconsistencies easily
First they claimed, talking against leader is Khuruj
And when we pointed out with references, he said You're not a Sahabi, Ibn Taymiyah, Albani
So if those people committed Khuruj or not according to your first statement?
And as we follow them, How can we only be Khwarij?
Wow! You are so knowledgeable of the religion. When are you going to start having classes in Sahih Muslim and Sahih Al-Bukhari on your TH-cam page. I hope soon. I am sure all the people want to benefit.
@@muhammadjamessutton
Do you have any counter argument for that?
I've shown inconsistency of RAND products own statement
@@timetorise8510 Akhi your statement was just so detailed and conclusive. How could anybody respond to that? I am sure your parents are very proud of you. Keep up the good work. You might have a future in trolling insha'Allah.
@@muhammadjamessutton I've represented arguments rather than trolling because It's related to my Deen
If you were Non believer you would not have got such soft words
@@timetorise8510 Congratulations. I feel honored. Now please go listen to my latest recording on Telegram.
Wallahi I love this brother for the sake of Allah.
you can see from his face expression that he is sincere may Allah bless him and guide us all ameen.
@@Nima-ec4tr Amin brother or sister. Thank you for your du'a!
Many don't understand Jhad has levels, on one's nafs, taqwa, dawa, sadaqa like Ansar did for muhajirun, then in the end came physical... these Carijis skip the most basic jhad nafs & dawa like they want dunya, so ask why last Caleef fell to secularism if not for bida division, ask who harmed the sahaba more... their silence is what's defeaning.
it's like a couple who want to get back together but don't deal with what really caused their split... shameful these carijis... Salahudin and ibn Qudama did work together but this was short term as it wasn't long before ahl bida sufi & shia grave worshipers aided monguls... long term solution is what the sahabs did!
The Messenger of Allah (salallāhu ‘alaihi wasallam) said: “If one of you sees something from the ruler that he hates, let him not publicise it.” This is a clear hadeeth forbidding openly protesting and publicly speaking against the ruler. Then he peace be upon him gave the Muslims a method of correcting the ruler: “Rather you should take the ruler by his hand into seclusion and advise him privately. If he accepts the advice, then that is good. If he refuses, then you have fulfilled your duty.” [Sahi Hadeeth reported by Imām Ahmad in al-Musnad 3/403 no. 15369, As-Sunnah of Ibn Abī ‘Āsim 3/102 no. 910.]
Hadith on Rulers: Advising the Muslim leader in private: Abu Wa’il reported: It was said to Usamah ibn Yazid, may Allah be pleased with him, “Have you not spoken to Uthman?” Usamah said, “You think I have not spoken to him unless you heard it? I have certainly spoken to him in the matter between us without bringing it up. I do not like to be the first to bring it up.”
Source: Musnad Aḥmad 21784. Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Arna’ut
Hudhayfa ibn al-Yaman reported: I asked, “O Messenger of Allah, we were living in an evil time and Allah brought us good in which we live now. Will there be evil after this good?” The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Yes.” I said, “And any good after this evil?” The Prophet said, “Yes.” I said, “And any evil after this good?” The Prophet said, “Yes.” I said, “How will it be?” The Prophet said, “Rulers after me will come who do not follow my guidance and my Sunnah. Some of their men will have the hearts of devils in a human body.” I said, “O Messenger of Allah, what should I do if I live to see that time?” The Prophet said, “You should listen and obey them, even if the ruler strikes your back and takes your wealth, even still listen and obey.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1847 Grade: Sahih (authentic)
According to Muslim عن حُذَيْفَة بْن الْيَمَانِ قُلْتُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ إِنَّا كُنَّا بِشَرٍّ فَجَاءَ اللَّهُ بِخَيْرٍ فَنَحْنُ فِيهِ فَهَلْ مِنْ وَرَاءِ هَذَا الْخَيْرِ شَرٌّ قَالَ نَعَمْ قُلْتُ هَلْ وَرَاءَ ذَلِكَ الشَّرِّ خَيْرٌ قَالَ نَعَمْ قُلْتُ فَهَلْ وَرَاءَ ذَلِكَ الْخَيْرِ شَرٌّ قَالَ نَعَمْ قُلْتُ كَيْفَ قَالَ يَكُونُ بَعْدِي أَئِمَّةٌ لَا يَهْتَدُونَ بِهُدَايَ وَلَا يَسْتَنُّونَ بِسُنَّتِي وَسَيَقُومُ فِيهِمْ رِجَالٌ قُلُوبُهُمْ قُلُوبُ الشَّيَاطِينِ فِي جُثْمَانِ إِنْسٍ قَالَ قُلْتُ كَيْفَ أَصْنَعُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ إِنْ أَدْرَكْتُ ذَلِكَ قَالَ تَسْمَعُ وَتُطِيعُ لِلْأَمِيرِ وَإِنْ ضُرِبَ ظَهْرُكَ وَأُخِذَ مَالُكَ فَاسْمَعْ وَأَطِعْ 1847 صحيح مسلم كتاب الإمارة باب وجوب ملازمة جماعة المسلمين عند ظهور الفتن
Awf ibn Malik reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “The best of your rulers are those whom you love and they love you, who pray for you and you pray for them. The worst of your rulers are those whom you hate and they hate you, whom you curse and they curse you.” It was said, “Shall we confront them with swords?” The Prophet said, “No, as long as they establish prayer among you. If you find something hateful from them, you should hate their actions but not withdraw your hand from obedience.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1855 Grade: Sahih (authentic)
According to Muslim عَنْ عَوْفِ بْنِ مَالِكٍ عَنْ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ قَالَ خِيَارُ أَئِمَّتِكُمْ الَّذِينَ تُحِبُّونَهُمْ وَيُحِبُّونَكُمْ وَيُصَلُّونَ عَلَيْكُمْ وَتُصَلُّونَ عَلَيْهِمْ وَشِرَارُ أَئِمَّتِكُمْ الَّذِينَ تُبْغِضُونَهُمْ وَيُبْغِضُونَكُمْ وَتَلْعَنُونَهُمْ وَيَلْعَنُونَكُمْ قِيلَ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ أَفَلَا نُنَابِذُهُمْ بِالسَّيْفِ فَقَالَ لَا مَا أَقَامُوا فِيكُمْ الصَّلَاةَ وَإِذَا رَأَيْتُمْ مِنْ وُلَاتِكُمْ شَيْئًا تَكْرَهُونَهُ فَاكْرَهُوا عَمَلَهُ وَلَا تَنْزِعُوا يَدًا مِنْ طَاعَةٍ 1855 صحيح مسلم كتاب الإمارة باب خيار الأئمة وشرارهم
And this Hadith goes in line with the statement of Sahl ibn Abdillah at tustari Rahimahullah , The wisdom behind these traditions is that violent rebellion, which is civil war, is almost certainly worse than the oppression of any government ruler. The long track-record of failed rebellions and harmful civil wars has led latter scholars to achieve consensus on the prohibition of insurrection. Stated Imaam Barbahaaree in Sharh us-Sunnah: "If you find a man making supplication against the ruler, know that he is a person of innovation. If you find a person making supplication for the ruler to be upright, know that he is a person of the Sunnah, if Allaah wills. Fudayl ibn 'Iyaad said, ''If I had an invocation which was to be answered, I would not make it except for the ruler.'' It was said to him, ''O Abu 'Alee, explain that to us,'' he replied, ''If I were to make an invocation for myself, it would not go beyond me. Whereas if I make it for the ruler, he is corrected and through that, the servants and the land are set in order.'' We are ordered to make supplication for them (ie. the rulers) to be upright. We have not been ordered to make supplication against them, even if they commit tyranny and oppression, since their tyranny and oppression reflect only upon themselves but their rectitude is good for themselves and the Muslims."
There are people who think that because some of the rulers commit acts of kufr and sin, we are obliged to rebel against them and attempt to change things even if that results in harming the Muslims in that country, at a time when there are many problems in the Muslim world. What is your opinion?
Praise be to Allah.
The basic comprehensive principle of sharee’ah is that it is not permitted to remove an evil by means of a greater evil; evil must be warded off by that which will remove it or reduce it. Warding off evil by means of a greater evil is not permitted according to the scholarly consensus (ijmaa’) of the Muslims. If this group which wants to get rid of this ruler who is openly committing kufr is able to do so, and can bring in a good and righteous leader without that leading to greater trouble for the Muslims or a greater evil than the evil of this ruler, then that is OK. But if rebellion would result in greater trouble and lead to chaos, oppression and the assassination of people who do not deserve to be assassinated, and other forms of major evil, then that is not permitted. Rather it is essential to be patient and to hear and obey in matters of good, and to offer sincere advice to the authorities, and to pray that they may be guided to good, and to strive to reduce evil and increase good. This is the correct way which should be followed, because that is in the general interests of the Muslims, and because it will reduce evil and increase good, and because this will keep the peace and protect the Muslims from a greater evil.
Source: Majmoo’ Fataawa Wa Maqaalaat Mutanawwi’ah Li Samaahat Al-Shaykh Al-‘Allaamah ‘Abd Al-‘Azeez Ibn ‘Abd-Allaah Ibn Baaz (May Allaah Have Mercy On Him), Vol. 8, P. 202
‘Amr on Fitnah: Tyranny a better situation than lengthy tribulation: Ibn ‘Asakir reported: ‘Amr ibn al-‘As, may Allah be pleased with him, said to his son, “My son, memorize what I instruct you: a just leader is better than abundant rain, a predatory lion is better than an oppressive leader, and an oppressive and tyrannical leader is better than an everlasting tribulation.”
Source: Tārīkh Dimashq 46/184
Ibn Taymiyyah said, “It is said that sixty years of a tyrannical leader is more proper than a single night without an authority, and experience has proven this true.”
Source: Majmū’ al-Fatāwá 28/391
How to Advise the Muslim Rulers & How Not To Advise the Muslim Rulers According to the Quran & Sunnah (Part 1)
Advising the Muslim Rulers is one of the most important matters of the religion it is so important in Islam that the prophet Mohammed said, “Three things that the heart of a Muslim will not despise (does not have any hatred in his heart for):making the action sincerely for Allah, advising the leaders of the Muslims, and holding fast to their jamaah.” Ibn Maajah, Authenticated by Shaykh al-Albaanee.
Advising the Muslim Rulers can lead to great benefits for the ruler himself and the ummah as a whole when done properly.
However if advising the ruler is not done according to the Quran and Sunnah it can also lead to great harm and oppression from the rulers upon the ummah in general and if there is no caliph, the oppression will be direct to the ruler’s subjects of his state.
Today we live in a time where many of the laymen have entered into the area of sincerely advising the Muslim rulers of today. This is great and should lead to a great overall benefit but instead it has lead to oppression from the Muslim rulers.
The reason why this has happened is because many of those who advice the Muslim rulers of today are laymen who have are takfire so they do not or those influenced by the takfire dawah. So their intention is for the sake of Allah when advising the ruler and they wish to bring about good through their actions however they are ignorant of the correct methodology in advising the Muslim ruler. Therefore they often advise the ruler in a way that contradicts the shariah and often leads to evil and rarely leads to any benefit.
Shaykh Ahmad Bazmool clarified the different ways of advising the rulers in his book titled ‘As-Sunnah in that which is connected to the one in charge of the affairs.’ Al-Ma’loom min Waajib il-‘Ilaaqah bain al-Haakim wal-Mahkoom, (pp.22-23).
After the shaykhs points in between the brackets are some extra points or info from ME (ABDUL KAREEM IBN OZZIE, NOT THE SHAYKH), to make it easier to understand the shaykhs advice inshallah.
The shaykh said: 1. Advising the leader in a secret/private manner that’s between the leader and the one advising.
As for the first manner of giving advice to the leader, it is when it is done privately. This is a foundation from the foundations of the methodology of the salaf, which the people of desire and innovation have opposed like the Khawarij and others. This is based upon that which is on the authority of I’yaad (bin Ghanam) that the Prophet said:
“Whoever wants to advise a sultan (leader/ruler) with a matter, do not do it outwardly but let him take him by the hand and go into seclusion with him. If he accepts it from him then that (is good) and if not then he (the adviser) has fulfilled that which was upon him (to do).” Musnad of Ahmad, as-Sunnah of Ibn Abee Aa’sim, authenticated by al-Albaanee.
(In the above hadeeth the prophet said “If he (the ruler) accepts it (the advice) from him (the ruler’s subject) then that (is good) and if not then he (the adviser) has fulfilled that which was upon him (to do)”.
Therefore if a person gives a Muslim ruler advice and he does not accept his advice leave him alone, this is because if he rejects the sincere advice then ultimately the ruler is responsible for his rulership and Allah will hold him accountable for it.
The prophet said, “If the ruler orders people with righteousness and rules justly, then he will be rewarded for that, and if he does the opposite, he will be responsible for that (his rulership).” Recoded by Bukhari.
The Messenger of Allah said, “Hear and obey, for they will bear responsibility for that entrusted to them (ruling over Allahs servants), and you for that entrusted to you (hearing and obeying the ruler and advising him sincerely)”. Recorded by Muslim
So the responsibility Allah has given the Muslim ummah in regards to the Muslim rulers is that we give them the bay’ah (pledge of allegiance) to hear and obey him in what they like and dislike to the best of their abilities and to advice the leader secretly and sincerely for Allahs sake. If a Muslim does this he has fulfilled that which was upon him to do.
However even if he ruler rejects the advice the person still has fulfilled that which was upon him to do. Thus when some of the takfires or those affected by their dawah claims they are calling for armed revolt or demonstrations or they are involved in both or either due to the Muslim ruler not accepting the ummahs advice to rule only by Allahs law these actions are haram. As these actions contradict what the prophet speech as the prophet said“If he (the ruler) accepts it (the advice) from him (the ruler’s subject) then that (is good) and if not then he (the adviser) has fulfilled that which was upon him (to do)”.
The prophet Mohammed did not say if the ruler accepts the advice then that is good and if not then the adviser has to call for armed revolt or demonstrations or be involved in both or either has fulfilled that which was upon him to do.
Calling for armed revolt or demonstrations or be involved in both or either only leads to more haram than then the rules bad rule as the other actions will lead to more blood shed between the Muslims, hatred among Muslims and disunity in that Muslim state all of which is haram in the shariah.
Shaykh Abdul-Muhsin bin Naasir al-Ubaykaan used to be with the Qutbiyyah in the early 1990’s. The Qutbiyyeen would shower praises upon him, accompany him and frequent his mosque in large numbers. He said: “in the past, I expressed my opinion in public; I now believe that public denunciations are a mistake, both on a religious and rational level. I continue, however, to give advice to and discuss matters with those in power, in private.”)
On the authority of Shaqeeq that it was said to Usaamah bin Zayd: quote: “Will you not enter upon Uthmaan and talk to him?” So he (Usaamah bin Zayd) said: “Do you see that I don’t talk to him except that I make you to hear (what I say to him)? By Allaah I have spoken to him in manner which was between me and him without opening an affair that I do not love to be the first one to open it.” Recorded in Bukhari 3267.
In this narration, we see that the advise given out in the open is an evil affair which will result in their being turmoil. Also we see that giving the advise privately is the origin in which the advise can be completed without their being turmoil.
(Advising the leader in a secret is a means of giving the Muslim ruler sincere advice for the sake of Allah as no is watching you and it is from themost excellent Jihad.
Indeed the Messenger of Allah said: “The most excellent Jihad is a truthful word spoken to an oppressive ruler.” The hadeeth was related by Ibn Maajah (no. 4012), and Ahmad (5/251); and it was authenticated by Shaykh al-Albaanee in Saheehul-Jaami’ (no. 1100).
Note how this most excellent Jihad takes a real man (i.e. brave person not a coward) to undertake it as it can not be achieved by hiding behind others and talking about the Muslim ruler behind his back in the streets, masjids, gathering of friends or family, lessons, on the net, on TV it can only be achieved by speaking to ruler directly in secret and then keeping the conversation secret.
This most excellent jihad can also be achieved inshallah by using any other means of communicating with the leader only like emailing his office, a letter to his office or phoning his office etc and Allah knows best.
Advising the leader in is secret also a way of implementing part of the prophets saying, when the prophet said, “The Deen is Naseehah (Sincerity/Advice).”We (The companions) said: “For who?” The Prophet said: “For Allaah, His book, His messenger, the leaders of the Muslims and their common folk.” (Muslim)
Imam An-Nawawee said “Sincerity to the Leaders is to help them upon the truth. To obey them in it, to order them with it, to remind and advise them with kindness and gentleness (does not include backbiting, slandering or name calling the Muslim ruler), to remind them of that which they are heedless and neglectful of, to help them fulfil those rights of the Muslims that have not reached them yet. Not to rebel against them and to enamour the hearts of the people with obedience to them.”
Imam al-Khattaabee said “From sincerity to them is Prayer behind them, Jihad along with them (not jihad against them), to give the zakat (charity) to them, and not to rebel against them(the Muslim rulers) with the sword when injustice or bad treatment appears from them (the Muslim rulers). And that they are not praised with false praises, and that duaa (supplication) is made for their righteousness.
(Fudayl Ibn Iyaad (d.187H) said, “If I had a supplication that would be answered, I would not make it, except for the ruler. Because when the ruler becomes righteous, the towns and the servants become safe and secure.” Refer to Hilyatul-Awliyaa (8/91-92).
Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal (d.241H) said, “Verily I supplicate for the ruler, for his correctness, success and support - night and day - and I see this as being obligatory upon me.’’ Refer to as-Sunnah (no. 14) of Aboo Bakr al-Khallaal.
Imam Al-Barbahari states, “If you see a man supplicating against the ruler, know that he is a person of desire (meaning a person from Ahlu Bidah), and if you see a man supplicating for the ruler, know that he is a Sunni (meaning from Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaah) inshallah.” (Sharh Al-Sunnah p113, 114))
(Copied from www,thekhalids.org)
Can you guys do a live session together with Daniel? Daniel said He wants to do it but why are you making videos back and forth and don't come to a live discussion?
May we all be reunited in Jannah..In'sha'Allah...:)
Say aamiin, :) not inshaAllah
@M. Agil Najib *_MuslimSkeptic Daniel Haqiqatjou says:“I support Deobandis, they are the real ones. Most scholars are deobandis. I’m a fanboy of deobandis. They are preserving Islam, according to the Salaf(!)” Also DanielHaqiqatjou: “I’m Athari, Hanbali” Sorry, but this man is a deceiver. Daniel is a sympathizer of Khawarij who praises innovators from Deobandi sect upon soofiyyah. Wahdat ul Wujood is one of the worst forms of shirk and this is one of the core beliefs of Deobandis and barelvis. The Ulama of Deoband propogate and defend this kufr but the majority of their public does not know this Aqeedah. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani had the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood as well. Haji Imdadullah Makki is the “Shaikh ul Ulama”, “Murshad”, “Syed”, “Aala Hazrat”, “The Shuyyookh ul Shuyookh of the Mashaaikh” of Deobandis. He writes in Kulyaat-e-Imdaadiya Page 18 printed by Darul Ishat that:“And after this he should be engrossed in the Zikr of HOO HOO so much so that he himself becomes the Mazkoor (i.e Allaah) and this is the meaning of Fana dar Fana. Upon achieving this state he will become a capapie of Noor”_*
*DANIEL HAQIQATJOU PRAISED INNOVATORS LIKE SUFI SECTS OF DEOBANDI DEVIANTS WHO HAVE PANTHEISM WAHDATUL WUJOOD AQEEDAH🔥🔥BUT innovators like deobandi naqshbandi barelwi etc. don't deserve any praise no matter how much khair they do or how many huffaz they produce each year! USING THAT LOGIC WE SHOULD ALSO START PRAISING THE QURANIST APOSTATES WHO ARE HADITH REJECTORS BUT "HAVE DONE SOME KHAYR"🔥ALLAH CURSED THE INNOVATOR AS WELL AS THE 1 WHO ACCOMMODATES THE INNOVATOR‼️🔥Let alone promotes such innovators' ideologies or sect or deviated beliefs!*
*ALL MY COMMENTS ARE DETAILED REFUTATIONS OF KHUROOJ AGAINST RULERS BY SPEECH OR WEAPONS! ALHUMDULILLAH JAAHIL SKEPTIC DH, ALI DAWAH, MH, BROHAJJI ETC. HAVE BEEN DEBUNKED IN ALL MY COMMENTS & VIDEOS!*
*FOLLOWING QURAN AND AUTHENTIC SUNNAH ACCORDING TO ASLAAF IS WRONG ACCORDING TO IKHWANI JAAHILS*
*_Deobandi sufis & Homosexual lustful relationships🔥Is there any truth in their own books and scriptures for such an accusation? Or is 'Mufti Aziz ur Rehman's scandal a one off thing⁉️‼️Lets read from works of Deoband which reads:Book: Hikayat ul Awliya, Arwah thalatha, page no. 228🔥Hafiz Mohammad Ahmad sahib, my father mentions that, once there was a gathering at khanqah (certain dedicated area) of Gangoh (name of place). All the mureeds (blind followers) & shagird (students) of Gangohi & Nanotwi (deobandi scholars) were present there🔥Gangohi said to Nanotwi with lots of love: Why don't you lie here a bit (with me)🔥At this Nanotwi, got a bit shy, but Gangohi persisted🔥So Nanotwi lay down flat as per request🔥Gangohi, got onto that same charpai (bed)🔥Then Gangohi placed his hand on to the chest of Nanotwi while lying on that bed facing him, in such a way as how an 'ashiq' (sexual lustful lover) tries to satiate their heart through it🔥Nanotwi objected:Miyan(word means husband, but can be used in a way of respect for a person as well), what are you doing!?🔥WHAT WILL THE PEOPLE SAY⁉️🔥Upon hearing this, Gangohi replied:Let them say whatever (i.e. I don't care)!_*
*_Haji Imdadullah Makki is the “Shaikh ul Ulama” “Murshad” “Syed” “Aala Hazrat” “The Shuyyookh ul Shuyookh of the Mashaaikh” of Deobandis. He writes in Kulyat-e-Imdadiya Page 18 printed by Darul Ishaat that:🔥“And after this he should be engrossed in the Zikr of HOO HOO so much so that he himself becomes the Mazkoor (i.e Allah) and this is the meaning of ‘Fana dar Fana’🔥Upon achieving this state he will become a capapie of Noor”🔥Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi confirms in Imdad ul Mushtaq page 62 that, “He (Imdadullah Makki) used to say that the human being is outwardly a slave and inwardly (Batini) the Haqq (Allah).” Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi further elaborates, “The batin is the reality which is manifest in the human, and the batin should not be considered a part of the human"🔥🔥🔥Deobandis seemed to have applied this recipe, hence in Fadhaail Sadqat page 558 Published by Kutub Khaana Faizi, Molana Zakriya Kandholwi narrates a dua from Rasheed ahmed gangohi in which he is asking Allah to forgice him & says:“O Allah forgive me🔥I am a Liar, I am nothing… What am I? I am nothing and whatever I am, It is You. And me & you are Shirk upon Shirk”🔥So he first admits that he is a liar, he is nothing and then tells Allah that what ever I am, it is you as well and that me & you are shirk upon shirk🔥Astaghfirullah🔥This is Wahdat ul Wujood. Now see the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood from Mirza Qadiani which he mentioned in one of his books🔥“I saw in my kashf that I am Allah Himself and I believed with certainty that I was definitely Him..”_*
*_Zakariya Kandhalwi was narrating from a letter of Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi to his Shaykh Imdadullah AlMakki🔥(All3️⃣are from the elders of deoband)🔥Ashraf Ali Thanvi confirms in Imdad ul Mushtaq page 62 that, “He (Imdadullah Makki) used to say that the human being is outwardly a slave & inwardly (Batini) the Haq (Allah).” Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi further elaborates, “The batin is the reality which is manifest in the human, and the batin should not be considered a part of the human…”🔥Deobandis seemed to have applied this recipe, hence in Fadhail Sadqat page 558 Published by Kutub Khaana Faizi, Molana Zakriya Kandholwi narrates a dua from Rasheed ahmed gangohi in which he is asking Allah to forgive him & says:🔥“O Allah forgive me… I am a Liar, I am nothing… What am I? I am nothing & whatever I am, It is You. And me and you are Shirk upon Shirk”🔥So he first admits that he is a liar, he is noting and then tells Allah that what ever I am, it is you as well & that me & you are shirk upon shirk🔥Astaghfirullah🔥This is Wahdat ul Wujood. Now see the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood from Mirza Qadiani:🔥“I saw in my kashf that I am Allah Himself and I believed with certainty that I was definitely Him..”_*
*_MuslimSkeptic Daniel Haqiqatjou says:“I support Deobandis, they are the real ones. Most scholars are deobandis. I’m a fanboy of deobandis. They are preserving Islam, according to the Salaf(!)” Also DanielHaqiqatjou: “I’m Athari, Hanbali” Sorry, but this man is a deceiver. Daniel is a sympathizer of Khawarij who praises innovators from Deobandi sect upon soofiyyah. Wahdat ul Wujood is one of the worst forms of shirk and this is one of the core beliefs of Deobandis and barelvis. The Ulama of Deoband propogate and defend this kufr but the majority of their public does not know this Aqeedah. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani had the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood as well. Haji Imdadullah Makki is the “Shaikh ul Ulama”, “Murshad”, “Syed”, “Aala Hazrat”, “The Shuyyookh ul Shuyookh of the Mashaaikh” of Deobandis. He writes in Kulyaat-e-Imdaadiya Page 18 printed by Darul Ishat that:“And after this he should be engrossed in the Zikr of HOO HOO so much so that he himself becomes the Mazkoor (i.e Allaah) and this is the meaning of Fana dar Fana. Upon achieving this state he will become a capapie of Noor”_*
*DANIEL HAQIQATJOU PRAISED INNOVATORS LIKE SUFI SECTS OF DEOBANDI DEVIANTS WHO HAVE PANTHEISM WAHDATUL WUJOOD AQEEDAH🔥🔥BUT innovators like deobandi naqshbandi barelwi etc. don't deserve any praise no matter how much khair they do or how many huffaz they produce each year! USING THAT LOGIC WE SHOULD ALSO START PRAISING THE QURANIST APOSTATES WHO ARE HADITH REJECTORS BUT "HAVE DONE SOME KHAYR"🔥ALLAH CURSED THE INNOVATOR AS WELL AS THE 1 WHO ACCOMMODATES THE INNOVATOR‼️🔥Let alone promotes such innovators' ideologies or sect or deviated beliefs!*
*ALL MY COMMENTS ARE DETAILED REFUTATIONS OF KHUROOJ AGAINST RULERS BY SPEECH OR WEAPONS! ALHUMDULILLAH JAAHIL SKEPTIC DH, ALI DAWAH, MH, BROHAJJI ETC. HAVE BEEN DEBUNKED IN ALL MY COMMENTS & VIDEOS!*
*FOLLOWING QURAN AND AUTHENTIC SUNNAH ACCORDING TO ASLAAF IS WRONG ACCORDING TO IKHWANI JAAHILS*
*_Deobandi sufis & Homosexual lustful relationships🔥Is there any truth in their own books and scriptures for such an accusation? Or is 'Mufti Aziz ur Rehman's scandal a one off thing⁉️‼️Lets read from works of Deoband which reads:Book: Hikayat ul Awliya, Arwah thalatha, page no. 228🔥Hafiz Mohammad Ahmad sahib, my father mentions that, once there was a gathering at khanqah (certain dedicated area) of Gangoh (name of place). All the mureeds (blind followers) & shagird (students) of Gangohi & Nanotwi (deobandi scholars) were present there🔥Gangohi said to Nanotwi with lots of love: Why don't you lie here a bit (with me)🔥At this Nanotwi, got a bit shy, but Gangohi persisted🔥So Nanotwi lay down flat as per request🔥Gangohi, got onto that same charpai (bed)🔥Then Gangohi placed his hand on to the chest of Nanotwi while lying on that bed facing him, in such a way as how an 'ashiq' (sexual lustful lover) tries to satiate their heart through it🔥Nanotwi objected:Miyan(word means husband, but can be used in a way of respect for a person as well), what are you doing!?🔥WHAT WILL THE PEOPLE SAY⁉️🔥Upon hearing this, Gangohi replied:Let them say whatever (i.e. I don't care)!_*
*_Haji Imdadullah Makki is the “Shaikh ul Ulama” “Murshad” “Syed” “Aala Hazrat” “The Shuyyookh ul Shuyookh of the Mashaaikh” of Deobandis. He writes in Kulyat-e-Imdadiya Page 18 printed by Darul Ishaat that:🔥“And after this he should be engrossed in the Zikr of HOO HOO so much so that he himself becomes the Mazkoor (i.e Allah) and this is the meaning of ‘Fana dar Fana’🔥Upon achieving this state he will become a capapie of Noor”🔥Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi confirms in Imdad ul Mushtaq page 62 that, “He (Imdadullah Makki) used to say that the human being is outwardly a slave and inwardly (Batini) the Haqq (Allah).” Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi further elaborates, “The batin is the reality which is manifest in the human, and the batin should not be considered a part of the human"🔥🔥🔥Deobandis seemed to have applied this recipe, hence in Fadhaail Sadqat page 558 Published by Kutub Khaana Faizi, Molana Zakriya Kandholwi narrates a dua from Rasheed ahmed gangohi in which he is asking Allah to forgice him & says:“O Allah forgive me🔥I am a Liar, I am nothing… What am I? I am nothing and whatever I am, It is You. And me & you are Shirk upon Shirk”🔥So he first admits that he is a liar, he is nothing and then tells Allah that what ever I am, it is you as well and that me & you are shirk upon shirk🔥Astaghfirullah🔥This is Wahdat ul Wujood. Now see the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood from Mirza Qadiani which he mentioned in one of his books🔥“I saw in my kashf that I am Allah Himself and I believed with certainty that I was definitely Him..”_*
*_Zakariya Kandhalwi was narrating from a letter of Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi to his Shaykh Imdadullah AlMakki🔥(All3️⃣are from the elders of deoband)🔥Ashraf Ali Thanvi confirms in Imdad ul Mushtaq page 62 that, “He (Imdadullah Makki) used to say that the human being is outwardly a slave & inwardly (Batini) the Haq (Allah).” Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi further elaborates, “The batin is the reality which is manifest in the human, and the batin should not be considered a part of the human…”🔥Deobandis seemed to have applied this recipe, hence in Fadhail Sadqat page 558 Published by Kutub Khaana Faizi, Molana Zakriya Kandholwi narrates a dua from Rasheed ahmed gangohi in which he is asking Allah to forgive him & says:🔥“O Allah forgive me… I am a Liar, I am nothing… What am I? I am nothing & whatever I am, It is You. And me and you are Shirk upon Shirk”🔥So he first admits that he is a liar, he is noting and then tells Allah that what ever I am, it is you as well & that me & you are shirk upon shirk🔥Astaghfirullah🔥This is Wahdat ul Wujood. Now see the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood from Mirza Qadiani:🔥“I saw in my kashf that I am Allah Himself and I believed with certainty that I was definitely Him..”_*
@@muhammadsalafiahlulhadith do you know who are deobandis?
@@sultan__8636 He is a Madkhali troll, ignore him... he is just copy-pasting what his master told him. Similar to WhatsApp University 😂
30:45 that is scary dont u think? he is insignificant yet he has often more influence then true scholars,
that is interesting tho, why is that? should the scholar be as a cloud and rain where is need or a well?
In previous video, I saw many "ulama" in the comment section, now I see the real ulama lecturing, masya Allah very clear explanation, barokallaahu fiikum. May Allah give us guidance, aamiin 🤲
Very educational video. I have learned the following:
-Only ulama who studied the deen very well can critique the muslim rulers, laymen are not allowed as this will create chaos and fitnah.
-Khawarij are still muslims but they deviated.
-We fight them only in the battlefield if they actually rise arms. They still have the rights of muslim. Ex: if they are injured we hospitalise them, we let them flee, we don t kill the prisoners.
-If they are just running their mouth, we are not allowed to fight them.
Please correct me if i didn t understand correctly the shaykh
What if the ulema who studied the Deen very well work in the interest of government policy ? What if they speak out against the ruler they are put in jail ? Then who is going to speak out
You're right.
The Messenger of Allah (salallāhu ‘alaihi wasallam) said: “If one of you sees something from the ruler that he hates, let him not publicise it.” This is a clear hadeeth forbidding openly protesting and publicly speaking against the ruler. Then he peace be upon him gave the Muslims a method of correcting the ruler: “Rather you should take the ruler by his hand into seclusion and advise him privately. If he accepts the advice, then that is good. If he refuses, then you have fulfilled your duty.” - Sahi Hadeeth reported by Imām Ahmad in al-Musnad 3/403 no. 15369, As-Sunnah of Ibn Abī ‘Āsim 3/102 no. 910.
Hudhayfa ibn al-Yaman reported: I asked, “O Messenger of Allah, we were living in an evil time and Allah brought us good in which we live now. Will there be evil after this good?” The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Yes.” I said, “And any good after this evil?” The Prophet said, “Yes.” I said, “And any evil after this good?” The Prophet said, “Yes.” I said, “How will it be?” The Prophet said, “Rulers after me will come who do not follow my guidance and my Sunnah. Some of their men will have the hearts of devils in a human body.” I said, “O Messenger of Allah, what should I do if I live to see that time?” The Prophet said, “You should listen and obey them, even if the ruler strikes your back and takes your wealth, even still listen and obey.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1847 Grade: Sahih (authentic)
According to Muslim عن حُذَيْفَة بْن الْيَمَانِ قُلْتُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ إِنَّا كُنَّا بِشَرٍّ فَجَاءَ اللَّهُ بِخَيْرٍ فَنَحْنُ فِيهِ فَهَلْ مِنْ وَرَاءِ هَذَا الْخَيْرِ شَرٌّ قَالَ نَعَمْ قُلْتُ هَلْ وَرَاءَ ذَلِكَ الشَّرِّ خَيْرٌ قَالَ نَعَمْ قُلْتُ فَهَلْ وَرَاءَ ذَلِكَ الْخَيْرِ شَرٌّ قَالَ نَعَمْ قُلْتُ كَيْفَ قَالَ يَكُونُ بَعْدِي أَئِمَّةٌ لَا يَهْتَدُونَ بِهُدَايَ وَلَا يَسْتَنُّونَ بِسُنَّتِي وَسَيَقُومُ فِيهِمْ رِجَالٌ قُلُوبُهُمْ قُلُوبُ الشَّيَاطِينِ فِي جُثْمَانِ إِنْسٍ قَالَ قُلْتُ كَيْفَ أَصْنَعُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ إِنْ أَدْرَكْتُ ذَلِكَ قَالَ تَسْمَعُ وَتُطِيعُ لِلْأَمِيرِ وَإِنْ ضُرِبَ ظَهْرُكَ وَأُخِذَ مَالُكَ فَاسْمَعْ وَأَطِعْ 1847 صحيح مسلم كتاب الإمارة باب وجوب ملازمة جماعة المسلمين عند ظهور الفتن
Awf ibn Malik reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “The best of your rulers are those whom you love and they love you, who pray for you and you pray for them. The worst of your rulers are those whom you hate and they hate you, whom you curse and they curse you.” It was said, “Shall we confront them with swords?” The Prophet said, “No, as long as they establish prayer among you. If you find something hateful from them, you should hate their actions but not withdraw your hand from obedience.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1855 Grade: Sahih (authentic)
According to Muslim عَنْ عَوْفِ بْنِ مَالِكٍ عَنْ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ قَالَ خِيَارُ أَئِمَّتِكُمْ الَّذِينَ تُحِبُّونَهُمْ وَيُحِبُّونَكُمْ وَيُصَلُّونَ عَلَيْكُمْ وَتُصَلُّونَ عَلَيْهِمْ وَشِرَارُ أَئِمَّتِكُمْ الَّذِينَ تُبْغِضُونَهُمْ وَيُبْغِضُونَكُمْ وَتَلْعَنُونَهُمْ وَيَلْعَنُونَكُمْ قِيلَ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ أَفَلَا نُنَابِذُهُمْ بِالسَّيْفِ فَقَالَ لَا مَا أَقَامُوا فِيكُمْ الصَّلَاةَ وَإِذَا رَأَيْتُمْ مِنْ وُلَاتِكُمْ شَيْئًا تَكْرَهُونَهُ فَاكْرَهُوا عَمَلَهُ وَلَا تَنْزِعُوا يَدًا مِنْ طَاعَةٍ 1855 صحيح مسلم كتاب الإمارة باب خيار الأئمة وشرارهم
And this Hadith goes in line with the statement of Sahl ibn Abdillah at tustari Rahimahullah , The wisdom behind these traditions is that violent rebellion, which is civil war, is almost certainly worse than the oppression of any government ruler. The long track-record of failed rebellions and harmful civil wars has led latter scholars to achieve consensus on the prohibition of insurrection. Stated Imaam Barbahaaree in Sharh us-Sunnah: "If you find a man making supplication against the ruler, know that he is a person of innovation. If you find a person making supplication for the ruler to be upright, know that he is a person of the Sunnah, if Allaah wills. Fudayl ibn 'Iyaad said, ''If I had an invocation which was to be answered, I would not make it except for the ruler.'' It was said to him, ''O Abu 'Alee, explain that to us,'' he replied, ''If I were to make an invocation for myself, it would not go beyond me. Whereas if I make it for the ruler, he is corrected and through that, the servants and the land are set in order.'' We are ordered to make supplication for them (ie. the rulers) to be upright. We have not been ordered to make supplication against them, even if they commit tyranny and oppression, since their tyranny and oppression reflect only upon themselves but their rectitude is good for themselves and the Muslims.".........................
@@kingmaker2603
Your speech is that of the khawarij, as the ulama are from wullat amr, stop accusing major scholars with such madness you'll not be able to answer for such slander on the day of judgment.
@@tayloryoung4974 Well I put 2 scenarios First is that ulema are government agents the Second is that they are under threat from government to not speak out against there policies both of these scenarios are highly plausible and we have seen it happen before so what should the public do in these scenarios ? It's a genuine question I have
@@kingmaker2603
It's none of your business, literally.
Your business is tawheed and Salah.
This reminds me of the parable of scholars of Baghdad foolishly debating while the Mongols were at the gates.
May Allah guide brother Daniel, at the end of the day we just want good for everyone. اللهم اهدنا يا رب
Ameen. May Allah ﷻ guide us all
Ameen
Yes, I agree. Daniel will be a great asset to our Dean if he was just to stick to certain issues and stay away from others..
@@abuahmad67 he is misguided, for a man who spews anti liberalism or whatever, he believe liberal media news or use these liberal media to incite muslims. Then i read his newest post about khilafa, that another red flag if i see one aside from his education history.
@@d.bcooper2271 then its their sin and its between them and allah. Our order is to advice them, kindly. As for scholars jailed for saying haqq is not new, throughout history scholars always jailed and its happen but never scholars of islam order muslims to disobey ruler because the harm is greater. Imam hanbali tortured and jailed by caliphs in his era but he never advocate of disobey and rebel and imam hanbali diassosiate himself with these peoples who do disobey and rebels. In the end al haqq win over bathil.
Please don't make schizophrenics an example.... It's a serious and grave suffering too..,..
May Allah bless you and all the brothers who are, for speaking the truth and guide us all and keep us steadfast and increase us in knowledge
This is not a good way of applying the w3th (advising) that you mentioned. Calling your muslim brother schizophrenic ?
one simple question, is Halloween halal or haram?
Haram
No one says Halloween is halal.
@@nonameh4867 Saudi is a shariah state. You are speaking without knowledge.
@@nonameh4867
Did they celebrate Halloween, the official statement is they just having a costume event on Riyadh by nom government.
@@nonameh4867 they didnt say it was hallowen . it was called weekend thriller . and it was different date . also you enter by a ticket. saudi is going for tourism nowdays so its for foreigner . beside look around u all the world and see how ppl act.
May Allah reward you brother Muhammad. I have been following your lectures and I have benefited tremendously.
The Messenger of Allah (salallāhu ‘alaihi wasallam) said: “If one of you sees something from the ruler that he hates, let him not publicise it.” This is a clear hadeeth forbidding openly protesting and publicly speaking against the ruler. Then he peace be upon him gave the Muslims a method of correcting the ruler: “Rather you should take the ruler by his hand into seclusion and advise him privately. If he accepts the advice, then that is good. If he refuses, then you have fulfilled your duty.” - Sahi Hadeeth reported by Imām Ahmad in al-Musnad 3/403 no. 15369, As-Sunnah of Ibn Abī ‘Āsim 3/102 no. 910.
Hudhayfa ibn al-Yaman reported: I asked, “O Messenger of Allah, we were living in an evil time and Allah brought us good in which we live now. Will there be evil after this good?” The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Yes.” I said, “And any good after this evil?” The Prophet said, “Yes.” I said, “And any evil after this good?” The Prophet said, “Yes.” I said, “How will it be?” The Prophet said, “Rulers after me will come who do not follow my guidance and my Sunnah. Some of their men will have the hearts of devils in a human body.” I said, “O Messenger of Allah, what should I do if I live to see that time?” The Prophet said, “You should listen and obey them, even if the ruler strikes your back and takes your wealth, even still listen and obey.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1847 Grade: Sahih (authentic)
According to Muslim عن حُذَيْفَة بْن الْيَمَانِ قُلْتُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ إِنَّا كُنَّا بِشَرٍّ فَجَاءَ اللَّهُ بِخَيْرٍ فَنَحْنُ فِيهِ فَهَلْ مِنْ وَرَاءِ هَذَا الْخَيْرِ شَرٌّ قَالَ نَعَمْ قُلْتُ هَلْ وَرَاءَ ذَلِكَ الشَّرِّ خَيْرٌ قَالَ نَعَمْ قُلْتُ فَهَلْ وَرَاءَ ذَلِكَ الْخَيْرِ شَرٌّ قَالَ نَعَمْ قُلْتُ كَيْفَ قَالَ يَكُونُ بَعْدِي أَئِمَّةٌ لَا يَهْتَدُونَ بِهُدَايَ وَلَا يَسْتَنُّونَ بِسُنَّتِي وَسَيَقُومُ فِيهِمْ رِجَالٌ قُلُوبُهُمْ قُلُوبُ الشَّيَاطِينِ فِي جُثْمَانِ إِنْسٍ قَالَ قُلْتُ كَيْفَ أَصْنَعُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ إِنْ أَدْرَكْتُ ذَلِكَ قَالَ تَسْمَعُ وَتُطِيعُ لِلْأَمِيرِ وَإِنْ ضُرِبَ ظَهْرُكَ وَأُخِذَ مَالُكَ فَاسْمَعْ وَأَطِعْ 1847 صحيح مسلم كتاب الإمارة باب وجوب ملازمة جماعة المسلمين عند ظهور الفتن
Awf ibn Malik reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “The best of your rulers are those whom you love and they love you, who pray for you and you pray for them. The worst of your rulers are those whom you hate and they hate you, whom you curse and they curse you.” It was said, “Shall we confront them with swords?” The Prophet said, “No, as long as they establish prayer among you. If you find something hateful from them, you should hate their actions but not withdraw your hand from obedience.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1855 Grade: Sahih (authentic)
According to Muslim عَنْ عَوْفِ بْنِ مَالِكٍ عَنْ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ قَالَ خِيَارُ أَئِمَّتِكُمْ الَّذِينَ تُحِبُّونَهُمْ وَيُحِبُّونَكُمْ وَيُصَلُّونَ عَلَيْكُمْ وَتُصَلُّونَ عَلَيْهِمْ وَشِرَارُ أَئِمَّتِكُمْ الَّذِينَ تُبْغِضُونَهُمْ وَيُبْغِضُونَكُمْ وَتَلْعَنُونَهُمْ وَيَلْعَنُونَكُمْ قِيلَ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ أَفَلَا نُنَابِذُهُمْ بِالسَّيْفِ فَقَالَ لَا مَا أَقَامُوا فِيكُمْ الصَّلَاةَ وَإِذَا رَأَيْتُمْ مِنْ وُلَاتِكُمْ شَيْئًا تَكْرَهُونَهُ فَاكْرَهُوا عَمَلَهُ وَلَا تَنْزِعُوا يَدًا مِنْ طَاعَةٍ 1855 صحيح مسلم كتاب الإمارة باب خيار الأئمة وشرارهم
And this Hadith goes in line with the statement of Sahl ibn Abdillah at tustari Rahimahullah , The wisdom behind these traditions is that violent rebellion, which is civil war, is almost certainly worse than the oppression of any government ruler. The long track-record of failed rebellions and harmful civil wars has led latter scholars to achieve consensus on the prohibition of insurrection. Stated Imaam Barbahaaree in Sharh us-Sunnah: "If you find a man making supplication against the ruler, know that he is a person of innovation. If you find a person making supplication for the ruler to be upright, know that he is a person of the Sunnah, if Allaah wills. Fudayl ibn 'Iyaad said, ''If I had an invocation which was to be answered, I would not make it except for the ruler.'' It was said to him, ''O Abu 'Alee, explain that to us,'' he replied, ''If I were to make an invocation for myself, it would not go beyond me. Whereas if I make it for the ruler, he is corrected and through that, the servants and the land are set in order.'' We are ordered to make supplication for them (ie. the rulers) to be upright. We have not been ordered to make supplication against them, even if they commit tyranny and oppression, since their tyranny and oppression reflect only upon themselves but their rectitude is good for themselves and the Muslims."....................
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
بارك الله فيك
Hadith on Rulers: Advising the Muslim leader in private
Abu Wa’il reported: It was said to Usamah ibn Yazid, may Allah be pleased with him, “Have you not spoken to Uthman?” Usamah said, “You think I have not spoken to him unless you heard it? I have certainly spoken to him in the matter between us without bringing it up. I do not like to be the first to bring it up.”
Source: Musnad Aḥmad 21784
Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Arna’ut
عَنْ أَبِي وَائِلٍ قَالَ قِيلَ لِأُسَامَةَ بن زيد رضي الله عنه أَلَا تُكَلِّمُ عُثْمَانَ فَقَالَ إِنَّكُمْ تَرَوْنَ أَنْ لَا أُكَلِّمَهُ إِلَّا سَمْعَكُمْ إِنِّي لَأُكَلِّمُهُ فِيمَا بَيْنِي وَبَيْنَهُ مَا دُونَ أَنْ أَفْتَتِحَ أَمْرًا لَا أُحِبُّ أَنْ أَكُونَ أَوَّلَ مَنْ افْتَتَحَهُ
21784 مسند أحمد
36/117 المحدث شعيب الأرناؤوط خلاصة حكم المحدث إسناده صحيح على شرط الشيخين في تخريج المسند
@@d.bcooper2271 your Dan H. has supported ls & AI Q imams who worked with yeah-hood, just allow me to intro my name... you dishonest... & Morsi called to democracy, so based on your Dh cariji idea its ok though right? be honest and don't divide believers.
@@d.bcooper2271 you quote WlKl & spam Dan H who's known to be a kathib & per jar wa tadil isn't be reliable...
have haya..., Salafis like Sh. Anjari have said Muslims should reject curuj to Erdogan & in general, watch NasirAlHanbali on this.
Barakallahu feekum ya ikhwan, Allah increase us in khayr
Ameen
Ameen
Aamiin
Allahuma barik. This is what you call a رد علمي by a dedicated student of knowledge .. not a student of Harvard and Deobandies. May Allah reward our noble brother Shaykh Muhammad James Sutton for this excellent response. I love this brother for the sake of Allah. Barak Allah feeh
The salafi brothers are now holding contradictory positions on this issue. Faris Al Hammadi reports ijma on the impermissible status of openly criticising a ruler. This guy says only certain scholars can do it. I noticed Shamsi and others are quietly shifting their position even though they held a similar position to Faris and Abdurrahman Hassan before.
I think the problem and the contradiction comes from rushing to conflate khawarij Aqeedah
and rebellion/critiquing rulers. Whilst the khawarij do call to rebellion, a rebel isn’t always a khawarij, and critique of a ruler doesn’t always have to be done with the intention of inciting rebellion.
According to DH all the conditions of khurooj have been met. That's all you need to know.
This was very beneficial in clarifying some of the points that Daniel made barak Allahu feek. The difference between Al Albani and DH in knowledge is huge. That difference went over my head when DH brought it up subhanAllah. Jazak Allah khair for the video.
May Allah guide us all and increase us in knowledge. Aameen. My heart shook when you mentioned the rights that Allah has over us. May Allah have mercy on us and guide all aameen. I really need to study more. subhanAllah.
We all do, may Allah make the knowledge easy to obtain and retain and make it beneficial for us and easy to practice.
@@d.bcooper2271 brother or sister can you tell me where you got your info, I would like to share it...
@@d.bcooper2271 Are you spreading spam from Daniel h's Instagram? Isn't he red pill? doesn't the exception tot he rule prove the rule? & isn't the greater harm Curuj? How did the salaf handle this?
@@d.bcooper2271 Imam Ahmad was imprisoned and tortured for 28 months. did he encourage his followers to rebel against the ruler? this kind of propaganda is trash
@@d.bcooper2271 So if I understand, are you suggesting that laymen should be speaking out on issues because the scholars are being jailed?
I do not know this sheikh you have mentioned unfortunately but wouldn't he have been a shaheed in the scenario you have presented? Did he not fulfill his obligations to advise the ruler? Wouldn't his affair be a good one on the day of judgement?
Regardless, how can we forgo the correct process (i.e. following the Quran and sunnah as understood by the salaf) because we are not getting our desired results?? Or because someone we loved has been treated poorly. This life is a test and success is with Allah and this dunya is only but a moment.
I have been wronged many times by my fellow Muslims brothers and sisters but that does not mean I wil no longer fulfill their rights as described in the Quran and sunnah. My affair is with Allah as is all ours. Any wrongs and injustices will be addressed on the day of judgement.
I don't see how we can strive for anything except improving upon ourselves and being patient in our efforts. Allah is the most knowledgeable. It just seems like a lack of patience bro.
I don't understand what DH has done that these people are saying that hes calling for khurooj? someone enlighten me please!
He said the Saudi rulers are trying to Westernize and modernize the country (it's true), and this can be seen by having music festivals in Jeddah, allowing and promoting Halloween celebrations which are shirk, etc.
According to this shaikh and others, only Ulema are allowed to criticize Muslim rulers openly and publicly because it can be dangerous and destabilizing for lay people to do so.
So this is what he did wrong
@@fark69 Why can't he criticize what is wrong? It really doesn't make sense, all Muslims are equal in the eyes of Allah except in good deeds in piety. The rulers can be criticized for their wrong doings just like anyone else. Just because someone is a ruler doesn't mean they are above the law
This video might help to get a clear understanding of the matter InshaAllah
th-cam.com/video/xrqdKEwkNTI/w-d-xo.html
@@hayat711 This is talking about rebellion? It has nothing to do with what Daniel said from my understanding he simply criticised
@@fark69 brother. To be honest. I think the truth of the matter is if the scholars refuse to rebuke the rulers in public after talking to them in private and they don’t listen. Someone else will rebuke them. The failure of the scholars of our time to do this is what gave birth to the likes of DH.
And rebuke or criticise is what I say. Not rebel or call for an uprising. Those are different things. We all know Halloween is wrong and borderline demonic. And it didn’t get here suddenly.
For long. Things like this have been brewing. The issue wasn’t arrested when it was small. Now it’s grown large to Halloween. Only Allah knows what next they’ll do. I think the scholars of our time need to speak about this else someone like DH will and people will listen
MashaAllah so beneficial and very educational بارك الله فيك و في علمك و ثبتك على الحق
Do you truly believe from your heart Daniel is an insincere liar? Because if not then it's not right to throw the khawarij label on someone who you think doesn't know better. We can still warn against someone without being accusatory as we can't read hearts (happy to accept correction if there's evidence against what I said).
So should we listen to this brother who studied Islam for decades or Daniel who has never studied Islam professionally a day in his life?
WE SHOULD LISTEN TO DH , HE STUDIED PHILOSOPHY.........
@King Sultan what does that mean? You gain some real Islamic education then you teach the people. If it’s not clear where Daniel studied then why are people so quick to follow him?
@kingsultan3who? Yasir qadhi as he himself admitted?
@King Sultan Must of his teachers are Deobandis and takfiris ( khawarij ) . His takfiris khawarij teachers who spend times in making individuals on all muslim rulers on Twitter and some even said that the salaf had disagreement on the sifat of Allah which not true . And his Deobandis teachers have a lot of issues in aqeedah just like majority of the Deobandis . Daniel has studied in Havard University in philosophy let's forgot that.
Oh my god, I don't know the brother, but he fails at basic logic!
He said: "if the people result to name calling it means they reached the end of the line as far as the evidence is concerned"
I say: right back at you! You just name called Daniel! What is this? Who is this brother?!
Have we seen the days that the dawah has become entertainment? What happened to correcting people on what they propagate without taking shots at the person? May Allah guide us all
I'm about to be done with islamic channels because of so much unnecessary drama 🙄. This video shouldn't even have been posted.
This is still so confusing and I'm not fully satisfied with this video as well , I don't label my self to any sect I'm Muslim as I can call myself a Salafi and commit kufr and nobody can know. And I can call myself a shia and be ignorant about the sins or kufr I'm committing but Allah can forgive me. So stick with what Allah called us in the Quran which is Muslim. Follow Allah and the prophet ﷺ like the Quran says. Don't add or subtract from it. So Being totally unbiased br Danial may Allah preserve him and bless him seems more accurate and have right understanding. the default opinion is that we are not allowed to criticise rulers in public advice him in private only , one who does that is either a khwariji Or has a trait of khwarijis.
.
Dan, Mhijab and Bro Hajji- the default opinion is to advice ruler in private but if it's not possible then criticise them in public based on enjoining good and forbidding bad.
.
If I have not strawmaned anyones position then this is what I have understood so far from both parties.
. Both are arguing from different principles all together.
.
Settle the principle and you settle the dispute.
Now even if we say okay let's only scholer can advice the ruler only privately then "
Sheikh al-Qadi did it and he was arrested in 2016 because of a private letter of advice he sent to the Saudi Royal Court in which he described violations committed by the Ministry of Education.
He was known for his work with the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice.
It’s been three years since Sheikh Fahd al-Qadi died in Saudi prison due to medical negligence by the authorities
He was sent to prison because he advised the ruler PRIVATELY! What will Madkhalis say next? Advise the rulers in your hearts?
Now i know madkhalis will come up with same few Hadiths like Musnad Aḥmad 14909 don't bother yourself I've read them all. Don't be a blind eye and have a look on all Hadiths to get a balance like
عَنْ أَبِي سَعِيدٍ الْخُدْرِيّ رَضِيَ اللهُ عَنْهُ قَالَ سَمِعْت رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه و سلم يَقُولُ: "مَنْ رَأَى مِنْكُمْ مُنْكَرًا فَلْيُغَيِّرْهُ بِيَدِهِ، فَإِنْ لَمْ يَسْتَطِعْ فَبِلِسَانِهِ، فَإِنْ لَمْ يَسْتَطِعْ فَبِقَلْبِهِ، وَذَلِكَ أَضْعَفُ الْإِيمَانِ" . [رَوَاهُ مُسْلِمٌ].
On the authority of Abu Sa`eed al-Khudree (may Allah be pleased with him) who said: I heard the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) say, “Whosoever of you sees an evil, let him change it with his hand; and if he is not able to do so, then [let him change it] with his tongue; and if he is not able to do so, then with his heart - and that is the weakest of faith.”
[Muslim]
Hadith 34, 40 Hadith an-Nawawi
sunnah.com/nawawi40:34
Or
الأمر بالمعروف والنهي عن المنكر
And many many Hadiths and verses like this.
As br Danial said absolute obedience is only for اللّٰہﷻ .
We should not rebel or talk against with tongue only if they're not doing clear cut kuffar like happened to libya and iraq and now iran is being the next target. They should not rebel against their government you all so called salafis should guide them and do what's best you can do to stop them but no all your support lies to Saudi and UAE. You're letting other rebel from hands and marching on road still stay quiet and speak only when someone point fingers against these two muslim governments this is hypocrisy at it's best.
So if a leader asked to marry your daughter forcefully, deal in interest which they're already doing with hundreds other sins like imprisoning thousands of scholars and imams in Saudi Arabia while bringing Korean mukhannatheen and global female icons of lust to sing and dance minutes away from the two holy mosques is not kufr, then I don't know what kufr can be.
Non Muslim are doing even more for oppressed muslim and Palestinians than our Muslim how can we are one body then. We should shame on ourselves we are hypocrites. The madkhalis will only say work on yourself work on yourself be a good muslim, and spend all the life on this as even a 15, years education is less for them and let our Muslim sisters children and brothers be molested and die in agony. As we will fight for the 10% difference between each other and let the evildoers do and achieve their goals on ruling us.
Br danial and dr israr ahmed and speaker like them are true salafis. As they talk about unity than differences. And has a balanced approached.
The ignorants and hypocrites will go after other muslims heads when they raise point based with Islamic evidence on clear kuffar so they leadership get improved and stop doing the kuffar because of societal pressure. No one talking about blood and violence but pressuring government to stop going against Allah and his commandments is our responsibility as a Muslim.
I don't get it ! Are you saying " Nahy ala almunkar " is egal to "calling or encouraging revolt against the ruler ?
I think for some reason you talked much BUT you missed the main subject !!!
May Almighty Allah protect and guide Bro Daniel H and family and shower them with his abundant and miraculous blessings..so many enemies who want to water down / reform Islam..deny the TRUTH
Dont like this attacking tone
Attacking tone? Lol. When Daniel makes name calling videos that's very nice and lenient, and when someone uses the Quran and Sunnah to explain the misinterpretation, then they are hostile? We are not Christian bro that you will attack us and we will kiss you. If you are hostile, you get the same thing back. This wasn't even hostile in the first place lol.
@@casilasgoaler wht ? Did watch the video?..he called him insignificant and stupid and belittling him ..how is that going to change daniel mind..why he didnt advise him upon quran and sunnah then
@@ahmedmahmoud6504 did you watch the video bro? The whole video was Naseeha. It was advice on the Deen. If you don't find the Naseeha here, you must be lost big time. And he rightly said that Daniel is no one in the bigger sphere of things. What is wrong here? None of them are. And you become even no one when what you spew is just nonsense. So Daniel should have known better. We don't advice people by calling their name. We advice by mentioning the Sunnah and that's the Naseeha in there. Kindly watch the video with a clear mind, you will understand. He is not speaking from himself, he is speaking what the scholars mentioned 1000 years ago.
@@casilasgoaler dont reply by the same u should watch it calling him stupid and insignificant is not an advice at all .u keep talking and u dont want to reply on that
Yeah bootlicker is not attacking tone?
May Allah unite together all our Muslims brother and show us the Sunnah of our Prophet Sallaho Alaihi Salaam .
Jazak Allah khair , We Love all our Muslims brother . I hope for PEACE
❤❤❤
Akhi you should change your profile pic it does not befit a muslim. BarakAllahu feek.
3eeb Akhi change the pfp BarakAllahu Fik
The Messenger of Allah (salallāhu ‘alaihi wasallam) said: “If one of you sees something from the ruler that he hates, let him not publicise it.” This is a clear hadeeth forbidding openly protesting and publicly speaking against the ruler. Then he peace be upon him gave the Muslims a method of correcting the ruler: “Rather you should take the ruler by his hand into seclusion and advise him privately. If he accepts the advice, then that is good. If he refuses, then you have fulfilled your duty.” - Sahi Hadeeth reported by Imām Ahmad in al-Musnad 3/403 no. 15369, As-Sunnah of Ibn Abī ‘Āsim 3/102 no. 910.
Hudhayfa ibn al-Yaman reported: I asked, “O Messenger of Allah, we were living in an evil time and Allah brought us good in which we live now. Will there be evil after this good?” The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Yes.” I said, “And any good after this evil?” The Prophet said, “Yes.” I said, “And any evil after this good?” The Prophet said, “Yes.” I said, “How will it be?” The Prophet said, “Rulers after me will come who do not follow my guidance and my Sunnah. Some of their men will have the hearts of devils in a human body.” I said, “O Messenger of Allah, what should I do if I live to see that time?” The Prophet said, “You should listen and obey them, even if the ruler strikes your back and takes your wealth, even still listen and obey.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1847 Grade: Sahih (authentic)
According to Muslim عن حُذَيْفَة بْن الْيَمَانِ قُلْتُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ إِنَّا كُنَّا بِشَرٍّ فَجَاءَ اللَّهُ بِخَيْرٍ فَنَحْنُ فِيهِ فَهَلْ مِنْ وَرَاءِ هَذَا الْخَيْرِ شَرٌّ قَالَ نَعَمْ قُلْتُ هَلْ وَرَاءَ ذَلِكَ الشَّرِّ خَيْرٌ قَالَ نَعَمْ قُلْتُ فَهَلْ وَرَاءَ ذَلِكَ الْخَيْرِ شَرٌّ قَالَ نَعَمْ قُلْتُ كَيْفَ قَالَ يَكُونُ بَعْدِي أَئِمَّةٌ لَا يَهْتَدُونَ بِهُدَايَ وَلَا يَسْتَنُّونَ بِسُنَّتِي وَسَيَقُومُ فِيهِمْ رِجَالٌ قُلُوبُهُمْ قُلُوبُ الشَّيَاطِينِ فِي جُثْمَانِ إِنْسٍ قَالَ قُلْتُ كَيْفَ أَصْنَعُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ إِنْ أَدْرَكْتُ ذَلِكَ قَالَ تَسْمَعُ وَتُطِيعُ لِلْأَمِيرِ وَإِنْ ضُرِبَ ظَهْرُكَ وَأُخِذَ مَالُكَ فَاسْمَعْ وَأَطِعْ 1847 صحيح مسلم كتاب الإمارة باب وجوب ملازمة جماعة المسلمين عند ظهور الفتن
Awf ibn Malik reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “The best of your rulers are those whom you love and they love you, who pray for you and you pray for them. The worst of your rulers are those whom you hate and they hate you, whom you curse and they curse you.” It was said, “Shall we confront them with swords?” The Prophet said, “No, as long as they establish prayer among you. If you find something hateful from them, you should hate their actions but not withdraw your hand from obedience.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1855 Grade: Sahih (authentic)
According to Muslim عَنْ عَوْفِ بْنِ مَالِكٍ عَنْ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ قَالَ خِيَارُ أَئِمَّتِكُمْ الَّذِينَ تُحِبُّونَهُمْ وَيُحِبُّونَكُمْ وَيُصَلُّونَ عَلَيْكُمْ وَتُصَلُّونَ عَلَيْهِمْ وَشِرَارُ أَئِمَّتِكُمْ الَّذِينَ تُبْغِضُونَهُمْ وَيُبْغِضُونَكُمْ وَتَلْعَنُونَهُمْ وَيَلْعَنُونَكُمْ قِيلَ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ أَفَلَا نُنَابِذُهُمْ بِالسَّيْفِ فَقَالَ لَا مَا أَقَامُوا فِيكُمْ الصَّلَاةَ وَإِذَا رَأَيْتُمْ مِنْ وُلَاتِكُمْ شَيْئًا تَكْرَهُونَهُ فَاكْرَهُوا عَمَلَهُ وَلَا تَنْزِعُوا يَدًا مِنْ طَاعَةٍ 1855 صحيح مسلم كتاب الإمارة باب خيار الأئمة وشرارهم
And this Hadith goes in line with the statement of Sahl ibn Abdillah at tustari Rahimahullah , The wisdom behind these traditions is that violent rebellion, which is civil war, is almost certainly worse than the oppression of any government ruler. The long track-record of failed rebellions and harmful civil wars has led latter scholars to achieve consensus on the prohibition of insurrection. Stated Imaam Barbahaaree in Sharh us-Sunnah: "If you find a man making supplication against the ruler, know that he is a person of innovation. If you find a person making supplication for the ruler to be upright, know that he is a person of the Sunnah, if Allaah wills. Fudayl ibn 'Iyaad said, ''If I had an invocation which was to be answered, I would not make it except for the ruler.'' It was said to him, ''O Abu 'Alee, explain that to us,'' he replied, ''If I were to make an invocation for myself, it would not go beyond me. Whereas if I make it for the ruler, he is corrected and through that, the servants and the land are set in order.'' We are ordered to make supplication for them (ie. the rulers) to be upright. We have not been ordered to make supplication against them, even if they commit tyranny and oppression, since their tyranny and oppression reflect only upon themselves but their rectitude is good for themselves and the Muslims."....................
@@Anonymous-lq1yb *Husayn ibn Ali ibn Abi Talib* (grandson of the Prophet Muhammad) REBELLED against the Umayyads. *Abdullah ibn al-Zubayr* (Grandchild of Abu Bakr) REBELLED against the Umayyads. *Muhammad al-Nafs al-Zakiyya* (a direct descendant of the prophet Muhammad) REBELLED against the Umayyads. *Imam Abu Hanifa* (founder of oldest Sunni Madhhab) OPENLY REFUTED Abbasid Caliph *Al-Mansur.* For this reason, Imam Abu Hanifa was punished by *imprisonment* and *flogging.* It is said that Imam Abu Hanifa was taken out each day and given *10 lashes* until he was released. *_Are all these GIANT pious Salaf didn't know the Deen? What are you talking about? Oh Madkhali, are these pious Salaf Khawarij?_*
@@MuhammadAbdullah-kx3kn you disgusting liar, I have seen ppl correct you on this...
8:03 now is that called name calling too or not?
Commanding good and forbidding evil is for every Muslim not just the scholars
When Br Daniel was calling out compassionate imams why didn't you say he is resorting to elementary school name calling?
Is he so insignificant now when he talks about Halloween in Saudi ? Clearly he is significant if his videos are taken down or is he is worthy enough to be called khawarij. I feel a lot of inconsistencies sorry to say. He called for public discussion isn't it? Why don't you sit with him and sort it out. May Allah guide us all
also br Daniel needs to come clean on extreme deibandi aqeedah on wahadatul wujood and rejection of almost every deoband alim of sahih hadith starting with how to pray salah. He can't bake the cake and eat it himself
Calling someone *Schizophrenic* , *Ya Jahil* , *Insignificant and ignorant* isn't elementary and sarcastic way of responding?
Evidence first, no shenanigans, praiseworthy demeanor and attitude... Alhamdulillah
The Messenger of Allah (salallāhu ‘alaihi wasallam) said: “If one of you sees something from the ruler that he hates, let him not publicise it.” This is a clear hadeeth forbidding openly protesting and publicly speaking against the ruler. Then he peace be upon him gave the Muslims a method of correcting the ruler: “Rather you should take the ruler by his hand into seclusion and advise him privately. If he accepts the advice, then that is good. If he refuses, then you have fulfilled your duty.” - Sahi Hadeeth reported by Imām Ahmad in al-Musnad 3/403 no. 15369, As-Sunnah of Ibn Abī ‘Āsim 3/102 no. 910.
Hudhayfa ibn al-Yaman reported: I asked, “O Messenger of Allah, we were living in an evil time and Allah brought us good in which we live now. Will there be evil after this good?” The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Yes.” I said, “And any good after this evil?” The Prophet said, “Yes.” I said, “And any evil after this good?” The Prophet said, “Yes.” I said, “How will it be?” The Prophet said, “Rulers after me will come who do not follow my guidance and my Sunnah. Some of their men will have the hearts of devils in a human body.” I said, “O Messenger of Allah, what should I do if I live to see that time?” The Prophet said, “You should listen and obey them, even if the ruler strikes your back and takes your wealth, even still listen and obey.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1847 Grade: Sahih (authentic)
According to Muslim عن حُذَيْفَة بْن الْيَمَانِ قُلْتُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ إِنَّا كُنَّا بِشَرٍّ فَجَاءَ اللَّهُ بِخَيْرٍ فَنَحْنُ فِيهِ فَهَلْ مِنْ وَرَاءِ هَذَا الْخَيْرِ شَرٌّ قَالَ نَعَمْ قُلْتُ هَلْ وَرَاءَ ذَلِكَ الشَّرِّ خَيْرٌ قَالَ نَعَمْ قُلْتُ فَهَلْ وَرَاءَ ذَلِكَ الْخَيْرِ شَرٌّ قَالَ نَعَمْ قُلْتُ كَيْفَ قَالَ يَكُونُ بَعْدِي أَئِمَّةٌ لَا يَهْتَدُونَ بِهُدَايَ وَلَا يَسْتَنُّونَ بِسُنَّتِي وَسَيَقُومُ فِيهِمْ رِجَالٌ قُلُوبُهُمْ قُلُوبُ الشَّيَاطِينِ فِي جُثْمَانِ إِنْسٍ قَالَ قُلْتُ كَيْفَ أَصْنَعُ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ إِنْ أَدْرَكْتُ ذَلِكَ قَالَ تَسْمَعُ وَتُطِيعُ لِلْأَمِيرِ وَإِنْ ضُرِبَ ظَهْرُكَ وَأُخِذَ مَالُكَ فَاسْمَعْ وَأَطِعْ 1847 صحيح مسلم كتاب الإمارة باب وجوب ملازمة جماعة المسلمين عند ظهور الفتن
Awf ibn Malik reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “The best of your rulers are those whom you love and they love you, who pray for you and you pray for them. The worst of your rulers are those whom you hate and they hate you, whom you curse and they curse you.” It was said, “Shall we confront them with swords?” The Prophet said, “No, as long as they establish prayer among you. If you find something hateful from them, you should hate their actions but not withdraw your hand from obedience.” Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1855 Grade: Sahih (authentic)
According to Muslim عَنْ عَوْفِ بْنِ مَالِكٍ عَنْ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ قَالَ خِيَارُ أَئِمَّتِكُمْ الَّذِينَ تُحِبُّونَهُمْ وَيُحِبُّونَكُمْ وَيُصَلُّونَ عَلَيْكُمْ وَتُصَلُّونَ عَلَيْهِمْ وَشِرَارُ أَئِمَّتِكُمْ الَّذِينَ تُبْغِضُونَهُمْ وَيُبْغِضُونَكُمْ وَتَلْعَنُونَهُمْ وَيَلْعَنُونَكُمْ قِيلَ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ أَفَلَا نُنَابِذُهُمْ بِالسَّيْفِ فَقَالَ لَا مَا أَقَامُوا فِيكُمْ الصَّلَاةَ وَإِذَا رَأَيْتُمْ مِنْ وُلَاتِكُمْ شَيْئًا تَكْرَهُونَهُ فَاكْرَهُوا عَمَلَهُ وَلَا تَنْزِعُوا يَدًا مِنْ طَاعَةٍ 1855 صحيح مسلم كتاب الإمارة باب خيار الأئمة وشرارهم
And this Hadith goes in line with the statement of Sahl ibn Abdillah at tustari Rahimahullah , The wisdom behind these traditions is that violent rebellion, which is civil war, is almost certainly worse than the oppression of any government ruler. The long track-record of failed rebellions and harmful civil wars has led latter scholars to achieve consensus on the prohibition of insurrection. Stated Imaam Barbahaaree in Sharh us-Sunnah: "If you find a man making supplication against the ruler, know that he is a person of innovation. If you find a person making supplication for the ruler to be upright, know that he is a person of the Sunnah, if Allaah wills. Fudayl ibn 'Iyaad said, ''If I had an invocation which was to be answered, I would not make it except for the ruler.'' It was said to him, ''O Abu 'Alee, explain that to us,'' he replied, ''If I were to make an invocation for myself, it would not go beyond me. Whereas if I make it for the ruler, he is corrected and through that, the servants and the land are set in order.'' We are ordered to make supplication for them (ie. the rulers) to be upright. We have not been ordered to make supplication against them, even if they commit tyranny and oppression, since their tyranny and oppression reflect only upon themselves but their rectitude is good for themselves and the Muslims."
I don't know how you can call insulting another Muslim character "praiseworthy demeanor", I will admit I am not as educated on the topic as both Daniel and this particular sheikh however I am seeing a lot of emotional behaviour that is not befitting of a Muslim
@@sami5322 agree. Evidence. Not emotion.
Calling an individual schizophrenic… Not cool
i dont think name calling dh as schizophrenic is praiseworthy attitude but whatever.
Assalamu aleykum wa rahmetullahi ustadh.
Bin Baz made takfir of Saddam Hussain because he was a Baathist. Was this ok?
Yh because he has the authority to do so
@@tamjidislam5558 so if an non Saudi scholar would criticise the current ruler this would be ok?
Again u missed the point of the video, daniel, u and me are not bin baz or ibn uthaymeen or ibn taymiyyah, if u cant spot the difference between them and laypeople like daniel who doesnt even speak arabic, then i have no words
@@K.w897 brother are you aware that even laymen can make takfir if the matter is obvious? You remember that hadith from Umar radiallahu anhu where we judge by the apparent?
You don't need to be a alim to see that many things which are happening in SA go against Qur'an and Sunnah. Many scholars who spoke against the things which are happening without even mentioning the name of the ruler are in prison. So it's not like there was no open denunciation.
And these things are happening for years now, let's assume the best and the shuyukh advised the ruler but we can all see that the fisq is spreading even faster.
Where is the line where khurooj is permissible?
Baathism is secular Arab nationalism and shaikhs ibn baaz and muqbil both made takfeer of him because of their kufr bawaah. The problem is ignorant takfeeris making takfeer of Muslims who are not like saddam, qaddaafi, Asad etc. There are Muslim rulers who are oppressors and sinners but do not have kufr bawaah or clear major kufr. But some make takfeer of them anyways upon jahl
But Daniel is not calling anyone to kharooj, why is he and Sajjid going into the extremes with each other suphanallah, you guys are brothers in Islam. Have a talk in private with a mediator and stop this nonsense may Allah forgive me if I said anything wrong. I just look up to both and hate these never ending refutations, you both have a large platform of followers, teach us Islam!!! We rather learn then see these arguments
*FROM THE 10 NULLIFIERS OF ISLAM: NULLIFIERS NUMBER 4️⃣&8️⃣ BOTH HAVE MINOR AS WELL AS MAJOR KUFR CATEGORIES & MUST ALWAYS BE INVESTIGATED BY THE SALAFI ULAMA☝🏻😎🇸🇦🕋🕌DEBUNKING KHAWARIJ isis alqaeda ikhwanul mufliseen fanboys & fangirls:🤚🏻STOP MISQUOTING THE SAHIH HADITH TO FULFIL YOUR IKHWANI KHARIJI TAKFEERI AGENDA OF CRITICIZING RULERS🔥THE HADITH SAYS SPEAKING A WORD OF TRUTH IN FRONT OF THE RULER (MEANING IN HIS OWN PERSONAL CHAMBER ACCORDING TO VARIOUS OTHER SAHIH HADITHS)🔥NOT CRITICIZING RULERS ON PULPITS OR OTHER PUBLIC PLATFORMS SUCH AS TV, social media etc.🔥ALSO EDUCATE YOURSELF🔥EVEN A SINFUL MUSLIM CAN BE A TAGHOOT🔥NOT ALL TAWAGHEET ARE KUFFAR🔥ALL KUFFAR ARE TAWAGHEET BUT ALL TAWAGHEET ARE NOT NECESSARILY KUFFAR🔥JUST LIKE EVERY TYPE OF SHIRK (MAJOR OR MINOR) IS HARAM BUT EVERY TYPE OF HARAM IS NOT NECESSARILY SHIRK🔥THE 5 HEADS OF TAGHOOT ALSO INCLUDE THE 1 WHO TAKES BRIBES🔥AN INNOVATOR🔥SO ACCORDING TO YOU EVERY INNOVATOR WILL BE A DISBELIEVER⁉️EVERY BRIBER WILL BE A DISBELIEVER U JAAHIL⁉️EDUCATE YOURSELF*
*ITS FARD COMPULSORY FOR EVERY MUSLIM TO HATE SHIRK & KUFR & ALSO HATE THE MUSHRIKEEN & KUFFAR BCUZ OF THEIR SHIRK & KUFR🔥🔥WHOEVER LACKS THE ABOVE✋🏻DOES NOT HAVE AL WALA WAL BARA i.e. ALLEGIANCE & DISAVOWAL (LOVE & HATRED) FOR THE SAKE OF ALLAH☝🏻😎🤲🏻🇸🇦🕋✅ALLYING WITH THE KUFFAR IS KUFR ASGHAR (minor kufr) BUT CAN ALSO BE KUFR AKBAR (MAJOR KUFR WITH CONDITION OF THE HEART THAT IS UNKNOWN & MUST BE INQUIRED)🔥ON THE OTHER HAND PEACE TREATIES WITH KUFFAR IS PERFECTLY HALAL BCUZ PROPHET MUHAMMADﷺ HAD PEACE TREATIES WITH THE KUFFAR🔥PROPHET MUHAMMADﷺ EVEN SAID WE WILL TAKE HELP OF THE KUFFAR IN JIHAD AGAINST A COMMON ENEMY🔥SUBHANALLAH☝🏻WHAT WILL isis alqaeda nusra bokoharam etc🔥TAKFEERIS GIVE THE FATWA ON MUHAMMADﷺ NOW⁉️Yes 1 of the treaties were broken unilaterally by THE MUSHRIKS of Makkah🔥SO SURAH TAWBAH WAS REVEALED☝🏻Even if it was broken🔥It does NOT make peace treaties KUFR OR HARAM🔥✋🏻SAUDI ARABIA BANS ISRAEL TRADE BUT HAS PEACE TREATIES WITH USA & TRADES WITH USA🔥NOTHING HARAM IN TRADING PRODUCTS WITH NONMUSLIM COUNTRIES🔥EVEN IF THEY TRADE WEAPONS✅NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT✅THE KHAWARIJ isis alqaeda nusra etc🔥PUT TAKFEER ON SAUDI GOVERNMENT FOR TRADING WEAPONS WITH USA🔥BUT PROPHET MUHAMMADﷺ LITERALLY SAID:U WILL FIGHT ALONGSIDE KUFFAR AGAINST A COMMON KAAFIR ENEMY IN JIHAD✅SO THAT HADITH REFUTES THE KHAWARIJ TAKFEERIS✅ALSO WEAPONRY ARE 1 OF THE MOST IMPORTANT ASSETS OF ANY NATION✅FOR ITS ARMY & DEFENSE✅IF U DONT HAVE HEAVY POWERFUL WEAPONS🔥HOW CAN U DEFEND YOUR COUNTRY AGAINST UNEXPECTED AMBUSHES & TERRORIST ATTACKS⁉️SO ALHUMDULILLAH ISLAM IS PERFECT✅Treachery or treason are all punishable by death under Islamic court of Law & also USA🔥& 1 of the main forms of treachery is Ridda🔥Apostasy🔥AMERICAN SUGARCOATERS WEST INFATUATED LIBERALIZED JAAHIL MUSLIMS KEEP SAYING:"DEATH PENALTY IS ONLY IF AN APOSTATE COMMITS TREASON AGAINST GOVERNMENT BLAH BLAH"🔥BUT WE HAVE NUMEROUS NARRATIONS THAT APOSTASY IS PUNISHED BY DEATH IN ISLAM✅THESE LIBERALS ARE ON THE VERGE OF KUFR DANGLING ON THE FENCE WALLAH REJECTING AUTHENTIC NARRATIONS OF RASOOLULLAHﷺ✅ALSO APOSTASY ITSELF IS THE BIGGEST FORM OF TREASON🔥If treason against a human probably temporary government is punishable by death penalty🔥THEN WHAT ABOUT TREASON AGAINST ALLAH THE KING OF ALL KINGS⁉️THE CREATOR OF THE WHOLE UNIVERSE ⁉️THAT'S THE BIGGEST TREASON SUBHANALLAH✅SO APOSTASY IS FAR MORE LEGIBLE FOR DEATH PENALTY THAN TREASON AGAINST A GOVERNMENT OR MAN MADE CONSITUTIONS LIKE USA EUROPE ETC🔥May Allah guide these JAAHIL liberals SUGARCOATERS of Islam AMEEN*
6️⃣ *MAJOR KUFR1️⃣ISTIHLAAL⛔BELIEVING & SAYING CLEARLY THAT 1 OR MORE HARAM/PROHIBITIONS IN ISLAM IS HALAL SUCH AS ALCOHOL GAMBLING DRUGS PORK ZINA MURDER STEALING ETC2️⃣JUHOOD⛔CLEARLY & VERBALLY REJECTING ALLAH'S LAWS BUT NOT IN HIS HEART (Like Firaun/Pharaoh VERBALLY REJECTED MUSA ALAIHISALAM BUT believed in his heart THAT Musa ALAIHISALAM was upon the Haq/Truth)3️⃣TAKZEEB⛔️CLEARLY & VERBALLY REJECTING ALLAH'S LAWS BOTH VERBALLY AS WELL AS IN HIS HEART i.e. BOTH EXTERNALLY AS WELL AS INTERNALLY4️⃣TAFDEEL⛔BELIEVING & SAYING CLEARLY THAT MAN MADE LAWS ARE SUPERIOR TO ALLAH'S LAWS5️⃣MUSAWAAT⛔️BELIEVING & SAYING CLEARLY THAT MAN MADE LAWS & ALLAH'S LAWS ARE EQUAL6️⃣TABDEEL⛔RULING BY MAN MADE LAWS & CLEARLY & VERBALLY ASCRIBING THEM TO ALLAH🔥🔥🔥3️⃣MINOR KUFR7️⃣Istibdaal🚯RULING BY MAN MADE LAWS WITHOUT ASCRIBING THEM TO ALLAH8️⃣Taqneen🚯COMING UP WITH A NEW LAW9️⃣Tashree' 'Aam🚯GENERAL MAN MADE LEGISLATION & ENFORCEMENT ON PUBLIC*
*THE JUDGEMENT OF ALLAH COVERS EVERYONE, NOT JUST THE MUSLIM RULERS✅MAY ALLAH GUIDE & PROTECT ALL MUSLIM RULERS AMEEN✅EVERY MUSLIM IS A SINNER & HE/SHE JUDGES BY OTHER THAN ALLAH'S LAWS THROUGH HIS SINS EVERY DAY JUST LIKE ANY RULER OR HUMAN BEING BCUZ NOBODY IS PERFECT LIKE ANGELS✅WHENEVER WE SIN🔥WE JUDGE BY OUR NAFS/EGO &/OR SHAYTAAN'S WHISPERS WHICH ARE CLEARLY NOT ALLAH'S JUDGEMENT✅🔥THAT IS 100% JUDGING BY OTHER THAN ALLAH & ITS NOT KUFR AKBAR TO JUDGE BY OTHER THAN ALLAH UNLESS IT CLEARLY AND VERBALLY FALLS UNDER THE 6 CATEGORIES OF MAJOR KUFR:1️⃣ISTIHLAAL (CLEARLY & VERBALLY SAYING THE HARAM MAN MADE LAWS ARE HALAL)2️⃣TABDEEL (CLEARLY & VERBALLY ATTRIBUTING MAN MADE LAWS TO ALLAH & JUDGING BY THEM)3️⃣TAFDEEL (CLEARLY & VERBALLY SAYING MAN MADE LAWS ARE SUPERIOR OR BETTER THAN ALLAH'S LAWS)4️⃣MUSAWAAT (CLEARLY & VERBALLY SAYING MAN MADE LAWS ARE EQUAL TO ALLAH'S LAWS)5️⃣JUHOOD (CLEARLY JUDGING BY OTHER THAN ALLAH'S LAWS EXTERNALLY WITH CLEAR PROVEN ARROGANCE IN HEART & ACTIONS AGAINST ALLAH LIKE FIRAUN WHO BELIEVED THAT MUSA ALAIHISALAM'S LAW OF TORAH WAS RIGHT BUT ARROGANTLY REJECTED & OPPOSED IT WITH HIS TONGUE & ACTIONS) & FINALLY6️⃣TAKZEEB (CLEARLY & VERBALLY REJECTING ALLAH'S LAWS BOTH INTERNALLY IN HIS HEART AS WELL AS EXTERNALLY WITH HIS TONGUE & ACTIONS)*
*THIS IS WHAT THE SALAFI KIBAARUL ULAMA ALSO MENTIONED SO U SHOULD FEAR ALLAH & STOP SUPER IMPOSING YOUR DEFINITIONS ON THE CLEAR CUT IJMA OF THE SALAFUSSALIHEEN & ALL THOSE WHO FOLLOW THE RIGHTEOUS SALAFI AQEEDAH & MANHAJ*
*MESSAGE TO RHYAD JAAHIL:You provided zero proofs of PRIORITIZING POLITICAL POWER & SOVEREIGNTY & ESTABLISHING KHILAFAH OVER ESTABLISHING TAWHEED u jaahil revolutionist ikhwani SAYYID QUTB IDEOLOGIST‼️PROPHETﷺ NEVER SAID BUILD KHILAFAH BEFORE ESTABLISHING TAWHEED‼️HE PREACHED ONLY TAWHEED FOR 13 YEARS IN MAKKAH & NEVER WARNED AGAINST ZINA ALCOHOL ROBBERY ETC. HE ONLY WARNED AGAINST SHIRK 1ST🔥✅️He said stick to THE JAMA'AH MAIN MUSLIM BODY i.e. Muslim rulers & kings in obedience‼️NO NEED FOR KHILAFAH WHEN U HAVE KINGSHIP MULOOKIYYAH‼️Rulership is also kingship MULOOKIYYAH JUST LIKE KSA🇸🇦& UAE🇦🇪 ALHUMDULILLAH✅️WHEN U HAVE MUSLIM KINGS‼️U DONT NEED KHILAFAH AS AN OBLIGATION AT ALL‼️KHILAFAH IS MUSTAHABB RECOMMENDED BUT NEVER FARD‼️SHOW ME 1 AYAH FROM THE QURAN WHERE ALLAH SAID KHILAFAH IS FARD⁉️OR ANY SAHIH HADITH WHERE PROPHET MUHAMMADﷺ PRIORITIZED ESTABLISHING KHILAFAH BEFORE ESTABLISHING TAWHEED☝🏻Khilafah is NOT FARD‼️IT'S ONLY A GIFT FROM ALLAH IF WE FULFIL IT'S CONDITIONS AS ALLAH SAID IN SURAH NOOR **24:55* ✅️
*_وَعَدَ اللَّـهُ الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا مِنكُمْ وَعَمِلُوا الصَّالِحَاتِ لَيَسْتَخْلِفَنَّهُمْ فِي الْأَرْضِ كَمَا اسْتَخْلَفَ الَّذِينَ مِن قَبْلِهِمْ وَلَيُمَكِّنَنَّ لَهُمْ دِينَهُمُ الَّذِي ارْتَضَىٰ لَهُمْ وَلَيُبَدِّلَنَّهُم مِّن بَعْدِ خَوْفِهِمْ أَمْنًا ۚ يَعْبُدُونَنِي لَا يُشْرِكُونَ بِي شَيْئًا ۚ وَمَن كَفَرَ بَعْدَ ذَٰلِكَ فَأُولَـٰئِكَ هُمُ الْفَاسِقُونَ_*
*_{Allah has promised those among you who believe & do righteous good deeds, that He will certainly grant them succession (khilafah) to (the present rulers) in the earth as He granted it to those before them & that He will grant them the authority to practice their religion, that which He has chosen for them (Islam) & He will surely give them in exchange a safe security after their fear (provided) they (believers) WORSHIP Me & do not associate anything (in worship) with Me BUT WHOEVER DISBELIEVED AFTER THIS, they are the Rebellious►_**_24:55_*
☝🏻 *_Khilafah Rashida or Prophetic Khilafah ended after 30 years‼️ESTABLISHING A Khilafah is NOT an obligation in Islam‼️ESTABLISHING TAWHEED IN SOCIETY IS THE MOST IMPORTANT OBLIGATION IN ISLAM‼️ ALSO KINGSHIP OR MULOOKIYYAH IS ALSO AN ISLAMIC SYSTEM WHICH DOES NOT NEED KHILAFAH TO REPLACE IT✅️IF KHILAFAH WAS AN OBLIGATION, WHY WOULD MUAAWIYAH RADIALLAHUANHU RULE AS A KING FOR 19 YEARS (instead of starting a new Khilafah after those 30 years of prophetic caliphate including AbuBakr Umar Usman Ali RadiAllahuAnhum) & THEN HIS SON YAZEED BECAME KING WITH OVER 60 COMPANIONS PLEDGING ALLEGIANCE TO YAZEED⁉️‼️KINGSHIP IS 100% HALAL & ISLAMIC HENCE WE HAVE KINGSHIP IN KSA UAE ETC. NO NEED FOR A KHILAFAH WHEN WE HAVE MUSLIM KINGS ALHUMDULILLAH!_*
*Rhyad is wrong‼️SAAJID IS CORRECT✅️ CORRECT TRANSLATION IS: THERE IS NO GOD WORTHY OF WORSHIP EXCEPT ALLAH*
*_ALL RADICAL KHARIJI TAKFIRI EXTREMIST IDEOLOGIES SUCH AS CIVILIAN KILLINGS SUIC!DE BOMB!NGS ETC🔥DEBUNKED BY PROPHET MUHAMMADﷺ✅️AbuAminaEliasاعوذ بالله من الشيطان الرجيم بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم✅️It is NOT LAWFUL for us to violently rebel against an unjust Muslim ruler or any ruler, as long as we can practice the basics of Islam in safety. Rather Muslims MUST be patient & encourage reform through non-violent action✅️Obedience to civil laws, whether in a Muslim or non-Muslim state, is obligatory as long as we are not commanded to commit sins✅️If the rulers command us to commit sins or they stubbornly persist in oppression, then we must strive to reform them without resorting to violence or destabilizing civil order✅️Allah said:يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا أَطِيعُوا اللَّهَ وَأَطِيعُوا الرَّسُولَ وَأُولِي الْأَمْرِ مِنكُمْ✅️Oh you who believe obey Allah & obey the Messenger & those in authority among you✅️Quran 4:59✅️IbnUmar reported The Prophet saidالسَّمْعُ وَالطَّاعَةُ عَلَى الْمَرْءِ الْمُسْلِمِ فِيمَا أَحَبَّ وَكَرِهَ مَا لَمْ يُؤْمَرْ بِمَعْصِيَةٍ فَإِذَا أُمِرَ بِمَعْصِيَةٍ فَلَا سَمْعَ وَلَا طَاعَةَ✅️Listening to & obeying the leader is an obligation upon a Muslim, whether he likes it or dislikes it, as long as he is not commanded to disobey Allah. If he is commanded to disobey, then there is no listening or obedience✅️Bukhari 2796 Grade Muttafaqun Alayhi✅️In many narrations the Prophet FORBADE us from rebelling against the rulers as long as they pray & allow Islam to be practiced in their lands. Violence that leads to civil war almost always results in a much worse situation than the unjust ruler himself. While an unjust ruler is an evil in itself, the violence required to overthrow him is even worse✅️Hudhayfa ibnAlYaman reported The Messenger of Allah saidيَكُونُ بَعْدِي أَئِمَّةٌ لَا يَهْتَدُونَ بِهُدَايَ وَلَا يَسْتَنُّونَ بِسُنَّتِي وَسَيَقُومُ فِيهِمْ رِجَالٌ قُلُوبُهُمْ قُلُوبُ الشَّيَاطِينِ فِي جُثْمَانِ إِنْسٍ✅️Rulers after me will come who do not follow my guidance & my tradition (SUNNAH). Some of their men will have the hearts of devils in a human body‼️I said “O Messenger of Allah what should I do if I live to see that time?” The Prophet saidتَسْمَعُ وَتُطِيعُ لِلْأَمِيرِ وَإِنْ ضُرِبَ ظَهْرُكَ وَأُخِذَ مَالُكَ فَاسْمَعْ وَأَطِعْ✅️You should listen & obey them even if the ruler strikes your back & takes your wealth EVEN STILL LISTEN & OBEY✅️Sahih Muslim 1847✅️SAHIH✅️AwfIbnMalik reported: The Messenger of Allah saidخِيَارُ أَئِمَّتِكُمْ الَّذِينَ تُحِبُّونَهُمْ وَيُحِبُّونَكُمْ وَيُصَلُّونَ عَلَيْكُمْ وَتُصَلُّونَ عَلَيْهِمْ وَشِرَارُ أَئِمَّتِكُمْ الَّذِينَ تُبْغِضُونَهُمْ وَيُبْغِضُونَكُمْ وَتَلْعَنُونَهُمْ وَيَلْعَنُونَكُمْ✅️The best of your rulers are those whom you love & they love you, who pray for you & you pray for them. The worst of your rulers are those whom you hate & they hate you, whom you curse & they curse you✅️It was said “Shall we confront them with swords?” The Prophet saidلَا مَا أَقَامُوا فِيكُمْ الصَّلَاةَ وَإِذَا رَأَيْتُمْ مِنْ وُلَاتِكُمْ شَيْئًا تَكْرَهُونَهُ فَاكْرَهُوا عَمَلَهُ وَلَا تَنْزِعُوا يَدًا مِنْ طَاعَةٍ✅️No, as long as they establish prayer among you. If you find something hateful from them, you should hate their actions but not withdraw your hand from obedience✅️Sahih Muslim 1855✅️Sahih✅️UmmSalamah reported:The Messenger of Allah saidسَتَكُونُ أُمَرَاءُ فَتَعْرِفُونَ وَتُنْكِرُونَ فَمَنْ عَرَفَ بَرِئَ وَمَنْ أَنْكَرَ سَلِمَ وَلَكِنْ مَنْ رَضِيَ وَتَابَعَ✅️There will be rulers from whom you will see both goodness & corruption. One who recognizes their evil & hates it will maintain his innocence, but one who is pleased with it & follows them will be sinful✅️It was said “Shall we not fight them?” The Prophet saidلَا مَا صَلَّوْا✅️No‼️as long as they pray✅️Sahih Muslim 1854✅️Sahih✅️Many of those who call for violent rebellion have resorted to the use of terrorism against innocent civilians to destabilize the government🔥Such acts are completely forbidden in Islam. The Prophet severely warned those who engage in unlawful civil disobedience & acts of reckless & indiscriminate violence saying that they have nothing to do with Islam & will have died a death of ignorance✅️AbuHuraira reported The Messenger of Allah saidمَنْ خَرَجَ مِنَ الطَّاعَةِ وَفَارَقَ الْجَمَاعَةَ فَمَاتَ مَاتَ مِيتَةً جَاهِلِيَّةً وَمَنْ قَاتَلَ تَحْتَ رَايَةٍ عُمِّيَّةٍ يَغْضَبُ لِعَصَبَةٍ أَوْ يَدْعُو إِلَى عَصَبَةٍ أَوْ يَنْصُرُ عَصَبَةً فَقُتِلَ فَقِتْلَةٌ جَاهِلِيَّةٌ وَمَنْ خَرَجَ عَلَى أُمَّتِي يَضْرِبُ بَرَّهَا وَفَاجِرَهَا وَلاَ يَتَحَاشَ مِنْ مُؤْمِنِهَا وَلاَ يَفِي لِذِي عَهْدٍ عَهْدَهُ فَلَيْسَ مِنِّي وَلَسْتُ مِنْهُ✅️Whoever rejects obedience to the ruler & divides the community & dies will have died upon ignorance. Whoever fights under the banner of 1 who is blind, raging for the sake of tribalism or calling to tribalism or supporting tribalism & is killed will have died upon ignorance. Whoever rebels against my nation, striking the righteous & wicked alike & sparing not even the believers & does not fulfil the pledge of security, THEN HE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ME & I HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH HIM✅️Sahih Muslim 1848✅️Sahih✅️The righteous predecessors (al-salaf al-ṣāliḥ) recognized that the evil of violent rebellion is far worse than the evil of an unjust ruler himself. For this reason, they counseled patience & wisdom in the face of injustice. In fact they would pray for the ruler to be guided to righteousness, as the reform of the ruler would benefit the entire society✅️HasanAlBasri saidلَوْ أَنَّ النَّاسَ إِذَا ابْتُلُوا مِنْ قِبَلِ سُلْطَانِهِمْ صَبَرُوا مَا لَبِثُوا أَنْ يُفْرَجَ عَنْهُمْ وَلَكِنَّهُمْ يَجْزَعُونَ إِلَى السَّيْفِ فَيُوَكَّلُونَ إِلَيْهِ فَوَاللَّهِ مَا جَاءُوا بِيَوْمِ خَيْرٍ قَطُ✅️If the people had patience when they are being tested by their unjust ruler, it will not be long before Allah will give them a way out. However, they always rush to their swords, so they are left with their swords. By Allah, not even for a single day did they bring about any good✅️Source alṬabaqātAlKubra 8789✅️FudaylibnIyad saidلَوْ أَنَّ لِي دَعْوَةً مُسْتَجَابَةً مَا جَعَلْتُهَا إِلَّا فِي إِمَامٍ فَصَلَاحُ الْإِمَامِ صَلَاحُ الْبِلَادِ وَالْعِبَادِ✅️If I had 1 supplication to be answered, I would make it for no one but the ruler. If the ruler is righteous then it will lead to the righteousness of the country & the people✅️Source SiyarA’lam An-Nubula 8/434✅️AtTahawi saidوَلَا نَرَى الْخُرُوجَ عَلَى أَئِمَّتِنَا وَوُلَاةِ أُمُورِنَا وَإِنْ جَارُوا وَلَا نَدْعُو عَلَيْهِمْ وَلَا نَنْزِعُ يَدًا مِنْ طَاعَتِهِمْ وَنَرَى طَاعَتَهُمْ مِنْ طَاعَةِ اللَّهِ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ فَرِيضَةً مَا لَمْ يَأْمُرُوا بِمَعْصِيَةٍ وَنَدْعُو لَهُمْ بِالصَّلَاحِ وَالْمُعَافَاةِ✅️We do not recognize the rebellion against our leader or those in charge of our affairs even if they are unjust, nor do we wish evil for them, nor do we refuse to follow them. We hold that obedience to them is part of obedience to Allah the Exalted & therefore obligatory as long as they do not command us to commit sins. We pray for their right guidance & pardon✅️AlAqidahAlTahawiyyah_*
*_AhmadibnHanbal saidلَا يُتَعَرَّضُ بِالسُّلْطَانِ فَإِنَّ سَيْفَهُ مَسْلُولٌ✅️Do not confront the ruler, for his sword is unsheathed✅️Source JāmiAlUlūmwalḤikam 34✅️AnNawawi summarizes the views of the righteous predecessors sayingوَأَمَّا الْخُرُوجُ عَلَيْهِمْ وَقِتَالُهُمْ فَحَرَامٌ بِإِجْمَاعِ الْمُسْلِمِينَ وَإِنْ كَانُوا فَسَقَةً ظَالِمِينَ وَقَدْ تَظَاهَرَتِ الْأَحَادِيثُ بِمَعْنَى مَا ذَكَرْتُهُ وَأَجْمَعَ أَهْلُ السُّنَّةِ أَنَّهُ لَا يَنْعَزِلُ السُّلْطَانُ بِالْفِسْقِ وَأَمَّا الْوَجْهُ الْمَذْكُورُ فِي كُتُبِ الْفِقْهِ لِبَعْضِ أَصْحَابِنَا أَنَّهُ يَنْعَزِلُ وَحُكِيَ عَنِ الْمُعْتَزِلَةِ أَيْضًا فَغَلَطٌ مِنْ قَائِلِهِ مُخَالِفٌ لِلْإِجْمَاعِ قَالَ الْعُلَمَاءُ وَسَبَبُ عَدَمِ انْعِزَالِهِ وَتَحْرِيمِ الْخُرُوجِ عَلَيْهِ مَا يَتَرَتَّبُ عَلَى ذَلِكَ مِنَ الْفِتَنِ وَإِرَاقَةِ الدِّمَاءِ وَفَسَادِ ذَاتِ الْبَيْنِ فَتَكُونُ الْمَفْسَدَةُ فِي عَزْلِهِ أَكْثَرَ مِنْهَا فِي بَقَائِهِ✅️As for rebelling against the ruler & fighting him, it is forbidden by consensus of the Muslims even if he is sinful & oppressive‼️I have mentioned many narrations with this meaning✅️The people of the Sunnah have agreed that the ruler should not be removed due to his sinfulness. As for the view mentioned in the books of jurisprudence from some of our companions that he should be removed, which is also the opinion of the Mu’tazilites, then it is a serious mistake from them & is in opposition to the consensus. The scholars have said the reason his removal & rebellion against him is forbidden is because of what that entails of tribulations, bloodshed & corruption for the harm in removing the ruler is greater than letting him remain✅️Sahih Muslim 1840✅️Some Muslims claim that the narrations mentioned earlier forbidding rebellion against a Muslim ruler only apply to a ruler who “implements the Sharia” as they understand it. This is an unjustified restriction of the prophetic command that they have invented✅️Rather, the Prophet has forbidden violence even if “THEY STRIKE YOUR BACK & TAKE YOUR WEALTH” & “THEY DO NOT FOLLOW MY GUIDANCE OR TRADITION” & "THEY HAVE HEARTS OF DEVILS.” The only criterion the Prophet mentioned is that they allow the prayer✅️For this reason, Imam Muslim collected all of these narrations under the following chapter heading:وُجُوبِ الإِنْكَارِ عَلَى الأُمَرَاءِ فِيمَا يُخَالِفُ الشَّرْعَ وَتَرْكِ قِتَالِهِمْ مَا صَلَّوْا وَنَحْوِ ذَلِكَ✅️The obligation to denounce the rulers when they contradict the Sharia & to avoid fighting them as long as they pray & so on✅️To claim that the Sharia is a political system, the absence of which necessitates violence, is a modern innovation in the religion✅️Instead the proper way to enjoin good & forbid evil regarding the rulers is through non-violent preaching, advising✅️AhmadIbnHanbal saidالتَّغْيِيرُ بِالْيَدِ لَيْسَ بِالسَّيْفِ وَالسِّلَاحِ✅️Changing evil with one’s hand is NOT DONE with swords or weapons✅️Source Jamial Ulumwal Hikam 34✅️MUSLIMS MUST SINCERELY ADVISE THE RULER USING CALM & MEASURED SPEECH✅️ALLAH SENT MOSES & AARON ALAIHIMUSSALAM TO SPEAK TO PHARAOH GENTLY EVEN THOUGH HE WAS A GREAT TYRANT WHO CLAIMED TO BE GOD & ENSLAVED & MASSACRED THOUSANDS✅️Allah saidفَقُولَا لَهُ قَوْلًا لَّيِّنًا لَّعَلَّهُ يَتَذَكَّرُ أَوْ يَخْشَىٰ✅️Speak to him with mildly that perhaps he may be reminded or fear Allah✅️Quran 20:44✅️Moses & Aaron spoke to Pharaoh with the intention to guide him to the truth, not to condemn him to Hell. If this is how Allah asked his Prophets to speak to 1 of the worst tyrants the world has seen, then we should act the same in our situation✅️We must also have a good intention to benefit the ruler on a personal level, as part of the good will (nasiha) they should receive from us. We should advise them of their misdeeds in private only✅️IyadibnGhanam reported The Messenger of Allah saidمَنْ أَرَادَ أَنْ يَنْصَحَ لِسُلْطَانٍ بِأَمْرٍ فَلَا يُبْدِ لَهُ عَلَانِيَةً وَلَكِنْ لِيَأْخُذْ بِيَدِهِ فَيَخْلُوَ بِهِ فَإِنْ قَبِلَ مِنْهُ فَذَاكَ وَإِلَّا كَانَ قَدْ أَدَّى الَّذِي عَلَيْهِ لَهُ✅️Whoever intends to advise 1 with authority, then he should not do so publicly. Rather, he should take him by the hand & advise him in seclusion. If he accepts the advice, then all is well. If he does not accept it, then he has fulfilled his duty✅️Musnad Ahmad 14909✅️Sahih✅️ Even so it may be necessary to become more vocal & assertive if the ruler is a stubborn oppressor. Speaking the truth to him in this case is a form of non-violent jihād without weapons✅️AbuSaeedALKhudri reported The Messenger of Allah saidإِنَّ مِنْ أَعْظَمِ الْجِهَادِ كَلِمَةَ عَدْلٍ عِنْدَ سُلْطَانٍ جَائِر✅️Verily among the greatest jihād is a word of justice in front of a tyrannical ruler✅️Tirmidhī 2174✅️Sahih✅️Muslims should reform an unjust ruler & enjoin good without resorting to violence or destabilizing society✅️Violence & terrorism leads to the fracturing of Muslim society, which is even worse than the oppression of the rulers. Rather Muslims must be patient & wise in the face of injustice & we should pray for Allah to guide the rulers to right conduct✅️Allah knows best_*
*_THE KHAWARIJ TERROR!STS NOT JUDGING WITH WHAT ALLAH HAS REVEALED🔥Ismailbin Sad said:I asked ImamAhmad about:وَمَنْ لَمْ يَحْكُمْ بِمَا أَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ فَأُولَٰئِكَ هُمُ الْكَافِرُونَ & whosoever DOES NOT JUDGE by what Allah has revealed, such are the Kafirun (i.e. disbelievers of a lesser degree as they do not act on Allah’s Laws✅️Quran 5:44✅️I asked:What is this type of Kufr⁉️He said:The Kufr that does NOT take a person out of the Ummah✅️Swalat Ibn Hani 2/192✅️Ibn alJawzi said:أن من لم يحكم بما أنزل الله جاحداً له، فهو كافر، ومن لم يحكم به ميلاً إلى الهوى من غير جحود؛فهو ظالم فاسق That whoever did not judge with what Allah has revealed arrogantly REJECTING it then he is a Kafir & the 1 who did not judge with what Allah has revealed inclining to following desires WITHOUT REJECTING it then he is an evil oppressive person✅️Zad alMaseer 2/366✅️In the early period of Islam, they declared AliBinAbiTalib to be a KAFIR when he intended to reconcile with Mu’awiyah✅️Ubaidullah ibn Abu Rafi reported:The Kharijites came out against Ali ibn Abi Talib & they said لَا حُكْمَ إِلَّا لِلَّهِ There is no rule (ḥukm) but for Allah. (_**_12:40_**_) Ali may Allah be pleased with him said:كَلِمَةُ حَقٍّ أُرِيدَ بِهَا بَاطِلٌ A word of truth by which is intended falsehood✅️Sahih Muslim 1066✅️Sahih✅️Imam Shatabee said about:وَمَنْ لَمْ يَحْكُمْ بِمَا أَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ فَأُولَٰئِكَ هُمُ الْكَافِرُونَ ✅️& whosoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed‼️such are the Kafirun (i.e. disbelievers of a lesser degree as they do not act on Allah’s Laws✅️Quran 5:44 “هذه الآية والآيتان بعدها نزلت في الكفار، ومن غيّر حكم الله من اليهود، وليس في أهل الإسلام منها شيء؛ لأن المسلم -وإن ارتكب كبيرة- لا يقال له: كافر. This Ayah & the 2 Ayat after it were revealed about the KUFFAR & about those who changed the judgement of Allah from among the JEWS🔥It has NOTHING to do with the people of Islam whatsoever BECAUSE if a Muslim even if he committed a major sin, it cannot be said about him that he is a Kāfir✅️[AlMuwafaqat 4/39]✅️Shaykh ul Islam Ibn Taymeeyah said about:وَمَنْ لَمْ يَحْكُمْ بِمَا أَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ فَأُولَٰئِكَ هُمُ الْكَافِرُونَ✅️& whosoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed, such are the Kafirun (i.e. disbelievers of a LESSER DEGREE as they do not act on Allah’s Laws✅️Quran 5:44_*
*_أن الإمام أحمد -رحمه الله- سئل عن الكفر المذكور في آية الحكم؛ فقال: “كفر لا ينقل عن الملة؛ ؛ مثل الإيمان بعضه دون بعض، فكذلك الكفر، حتى يجيء من ذلك أمر لا يختلف فيه”._*
*_ImamAhmad was asked about the type of KUFR mentioned in the Ayah of judging & he said✅️THIS IS THE KUFR WHICH DOES NOT take a person out of the Ummah; just as some parts of EMAN are lesser AND the same is for KUFR, until there appears a matter of which there is no difference of opinion in✅️Majmoo alFatawa 7/2541️⃣BCUZ they left the correct way & this has been testified by the Messenger of Allah ﷺ, as the Khawarij interpreted the Ayat with the wrong explanation. This is what innovators do & this is the door through which they enter2️⃣BCUZ they exaggerated concerning the rulings of the Quran & the Sunnah & they exaggerated excessively✅️Ibn Umar on Rebels:The Khawarij apply verses about disbelievers against Muslims✅️AlBukhari reported: Ibn Umar RADIALLAHHUANHU considered the Khawārij rebels to be the worst of Allah’s creation & he said:“Verily they take verses that were revealed about UNBELIEVERS & use them against the BELIEVERS✅️Sahih Bukhari 6531_*
*_عن البخاري وَكَانَ ابْنُ عُمَرَ رضي الله عنه يَرَاهُمْ شِرَارَ خَلْقِ اللَّهِ وَقَالَ إِنَّهُمْ انْطَلَقُوا إِلَى آيَاتٍ نَزَلَتْ فِي الْكُفَّارِ فَجَعَلُوهَا عَلَى الْمُؤْمِنِينَ6531 صحيح البخاري كتاب استتابة المرتدين والمعاندين وقتالهم باب قتل الخوارج والملحدين بعد إقامة الحجة عليهم_*
*_Imam al-Baghawi (d516 AH/1122 CE) Rahimahullah mentioned in Ma'alim utTanzil vol 3 p61:IbnAbbas & Tawus stated:It is NOT the kufr which expels one from the Religion✅️Rather if one does it then he is a disbeliever, yet he is not like the one who disbelieves in Allāh & the Last Day✅️Shaykh'ul Islam Ibn Taymiyah (d. 728 AH/1328 CE) rahimahullah, stated in MajmuAlFatawa vol 7 p312:Therefore from the statements of the Salaf were:A person can have within him both īmān & kufr" & likewise within their saying: "that one can have within him both īmān & kufr, it is not the kufr which expels one from the Religion." Just as IbnAbbas & his companions (students) stated in regards to the saying of Allāh:"And whoever does not judge by what Allāh Has Revealed‼️then it is those who are disbelievers✅️Quran 5:44✅️They said it means: "They disbelieved with a type of kufr which does not expel one from the Religion" & Ahmad & other Imāms of the Sunnah followed him in that✅️Ibn Taymiyyah also said in MajmuAlFatawa vol 7, p522:IbnAbbas & others from the Salaf stated in regards to Allāh's saying:Whoever does not rule by what Allah Has Revealed, then they are the disbelievers✅️Quran 5:44✅️Whoever does not rule by what Allāh Has Revealed, then they are the transgressors✅️_**_5:45_**_ ✅️Whoever does not rule by what Allāh Has Revealed, then they are the sinful✅️_**_5:47_**_✅️It is:🔥"kufr less than kufr, fisq less than fisq & dhulm less than dhulm✅️Imams Ahmad, Bukhari & others mentioned this✅️IbnTaymiyyah also said in MajmuAlFatawa, vol 7 p350-351:"He could be Muslim yet within him is kufr less than kufr which does not expel him from Islām absolutely, as the Companions said, such as IbnAbbas & others: "kufr less than kufr" this is the saying of the generality of the Salaf and this is what Ahmad and others documented. This is also what al-Bukhārī bore testimony to in is Sahih✅️(Refer to: Imam Bukhari's chaptering in his Sahīh:Chapter:Kufr Towards Spouses & Kufr Less than Kufr.' Al Qādī Ibn al-'Arabī al-Mālikī stated in Fath ul Bārī, vol 1 p83:"The intent of the classifier (i.e. al-Bukhārī) is to explain that acts of obedience are named 'īmān' and likewise acts of disobedience are named 'kufr'. However, when kufr is applied in this instance the intent is not the kufr which expels from the Religion.")✅️A Study of the Tafsir of Ibn 'Abbās: Kufr Dūna Kufr_*
*_The best of your rulers are those whom you love & they love you, who pray for you & you pray for them. The worst of your rulers are those whom you hate & they hate you, whom you curse & they curse you✅️It was said “Shall we confront them with swords?” The Prophet said:_*
*_لَا مَا أَقَامُوا فِيكُمْ الصَّلَاةَ وَإِذَا رَأَيْتُمْ مِنْ وُلَاتِكُمْ شَيْئًا تَكْرَهُونَهُ فَاكْرَهُوا عَمَلَهُ وَلَا تَنْزِعُوا يَدًا مِنْ طَاعَةٍ_*
*_No🔥as long as they establish prayer among you. If you find something hateful from them, you should hate their actions BUT NOT withdraw your hand from obedience✅️SAHIH MUSLIM 1855✅️SAHIH_*
How to Advise the Muslim Rulers & How Not To Advise the Muslim Rulers According to the Quran & Sunnah (Part 1)
Advising the Muslim Rulers is one of the most important matters of the religion it is so important in Islam that the prophet Mohammed said, “Three things that the heart of a Muslim will not despise (does not have any hatred in his heart for):making the action sincerely for Allah, advising the leaders of the Muslims, and holding fast to their jamaah.” Ibn Maajah, Authenticated by Shaykh al-Albaanee.
Advising the Muslim Rulers can lead to great benefits for the ruler himself and the ummah as a whole when done properly.
However if advising the ruler is not done according to the Quran and Sunnah it can also lead to great harm and oppression from the rulers upon the ummah in general and if there is no caliph, the oppression will be direct to the ruler’s subjects of his state.
Today we live in a time where many of the laymen have entered into the area of sincerely advising the Muslim rulers of today. This is great and should lead to a great overall benefit but instead it has lead to oppression from the Muslim rulers.
The reason why this has happened is because many of those who advice the Muslim rulers of today are laymen who have are takfire so they do not or those influenced by the takfire dawah. So their intention is for the sake of Allah when advising the ruler and they wish to bring about good through their actions however they are ignorant of the correct methodology in advising the Muslim ruler. Therefore they often advise the ruler in a way that contradicts the shariah and often leads to evil and rarely leads to any benefit.
Shaykh Ahmad Bazmool clarified the different ways of advising the rulers in his book titled ‘As-Sunnah in that which is connected to the one in charge of the affairs.’ Al-Ma’loom min Waajib il-‘Ilaaqah bain al-Haakim wal-Mahkoom, (pp.22-23).
After the shaykhs points in between the brackets are some extra points or info from ME (ABDUL KAREEM IBN OZZIE, NOT THE SHAYKH), to make it easier to understand the shaykhs advice inshallah.
The shaykh said: 1. Advising the leader in a secret/private manner that’s between the leader and the one advising.
As for the first manner of giving advice to the leader, it is when it is done privately. This is a foundation from the foundations of the methodology of the salaf, which the people of desire and innovation have opposed like the Khawarij and others. This is based upon that which is on the authority of I’yaad (bin Ghanam) that the Prophet said:
“Whoever wants to advise a sultan (leader/ruler) with a matter, do not do it outwardly but let him take him by the hand and go into seclusion with him. If he accepts it from him then that (is good) and if not then he (the adviser) has fulfilled that which was upon him (to do).” Musnad of Ahmad, as-Sunnah of Ibn Abee Aa’sim, authenticated by al-Albaanee.
(In the above hadeeth the prophet said “If he (the ruler) accepts it (the advice) from him (the ruler’s subject) then that (is good) and if not then he (the adviser) has fulfilled that which was upon him (to do)”.
Therefore if a person gives a Muslim ruler advice and he does not accept his advice leave him alone, this is because if he rejects the sincere advice then ultimately the ruler is responsible for his rulership and Allah will hold him accountable for it.
The prophet said, “If the ruler orders people with righteousness and rules justly, then he will be rewarded for that, and if he does the opposite, he will be responsible for that (his rulership).” Recoded by Bukhari.
The Messenger of Allah said, “Hear and obey, for they will bear responsibility for that entrusted to them (ruling over Allahs servants), and you for that entrusted to you (hearing and obeying the ruler and advising him sincerely)”. Recorded by Muslim
So the responsibility Allah has given the Muslim ummah in regards to the Muslim rulers is that we give them the bay’ah (pledge of allegiance) to hear and obey him in what they like and dislike to the best of their abilities and to advice the leader secretly and sincerely for Allahs sake. If a Muslim does this he has fulfilled that which was upon him to do.
However even if he ruler rejects the advice the person still has fulfilled that which was upon him to do. Thus when some of the takfires or those affected by their dawah claims they are calling for armed revolt or demonstrations or they are involved in both or either due to the Muslim ruler not accepting the ummahs advice to rule only by Allahs law these actions are haram. As these actions contradict what the prophet speech as the prophet said“If he (the ruler) accepts it (the advice) from him (the ruler’s subject) then that (is good) and if not then he (the adviser) has fulfilled that which was upon him (to do)”.
The prophet Mohammed did not say if the ruler accepts the advice then that is good and if not then the adviser has to call for armed revolt or demonstrations or be involved in both or either has fulfilled that which was upon him to do.
Calling for armed revolt or demonstrations or be involved in both or either only leads to more haram than then the rules bad rule as the other actions will lead to more blood shed between the Muslims, hatred among Muslims and disunity in that Muslim state all of which is haram in the shariah.
Shaykh Abdul-Muhsin bin Naasir al-Ubaykaan used to be with the Qutbiyyah in the early 1990’s. The Qutbiyyeen would shower praises upon him, accompany him and frequent his mosque in large numbers. He said: “in the past, I expressed my opinion in public; I now believe that public denunciations are a mistake, both on a religious and rational level. I continue, however, to give advice to and discuss matters with those in power, in private.”)
On the authority of Shaqeeq that it was said to Usaamah bin Zayd: quote: “Will you not enter upon Uthmaan and talk to him?” So he (Usaamah bin Zayd) said: “Do you see that I don’t talk to him except that I make you to hear (what I say to him)? By Allaah I have spoken to him in manner which was between me and him without opening an affair that I do not love to be the first one to open it.” Recorded in Bukhari 3267.
In this narration, we see that the advise given out in the open is an evil affair which will result in their being turmoil. Also we see that giving the advise privately is the origin in which the advise can be completed without their being turmoil.
(Advising the leader in a secret is a means of giving the Muslim ruler sincere advice for the sake of Allah as no is watching you and it is from themost excellent Jihad.
Indeed the Messenger of Allah said: “The most excellent Jihad is a truthful word spoken to an oppressive ruler.” The hadeeth was related by Ibn Maajah (no. 4012), and Ahmad (5/251); and it was authenticated by Shaykh al-Albaanee in Saheehul-Jaami’ (no. 1100).
Note how this most excellent Jihad takes a real man (i.e. brave person not a coward) to undertake it as it can not be achieved by hiding behind others and talking about the Muslim ruler behind his back in the streets, masjids, gathering of friends or family, lessons, on the net, on TV it can only be achieved by speaking to ruler directly in secret and then keeping the conversation secret.
This most excellent jihad can also be achieved inshallah by using any other means of communicating with the leader only like emailing his office, a letter to his office or phoning his office etc and Allah knows best.
Advising the leader in is secret also a way of implementing part of the prophets saying, when the prophet said, “The Deen is Naseehah (Sincerity/Advice).”We (The companions) said: “For who?” The Prophet said: “For Allaah, His book, His messenger, the leaders of the Muslims and their common folk.” (Muslim)
Imam An-Nawawee said “Sincerity to the Leaders is to help them upon the truth. To obey them in it, to order them with it, to remind and advise them with kindness and gentleness (does not include backbiting, slandering or name calling the Muslim ruler), to remind them of that which they are heedless and neglectful of, to help them fulfil those rights of the Muslims that have not reached them yet. Not to rebel against them and to enamour the hearts of the people with obedience to them.”
Imam al-Khattaabee said “From sincerity to them is Prayer behind them, Jihad along with them (not jihad against them), to give the zakat (charity) to them, and not to rebel against them(the Muslim rulers) with the sword when injustice or bad treatment appears from them (the Muslim rulers). And that they are not praised with false praises, and that duaa (supplication) is made for their righteousness.
(Fudayl Ibn Iyaad (d.187H) said, “If I had a supplication that would be answered, I would not make it, except for the ruler. Because when the ruler becomes righteous, the towns and the servants become safe and secure.” Refer to Hilyatul-Awliyaa (8/91-92).
Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal (d.241H) said, “Verily I supplicate for the ruler, for his correctness, success and support - night and day - and I see this as being obligatory upon me.’’ Refer to as-Sunnah (no. 14) of Aboo Bakr al-Khallaal.
Imam Al-Barbahari states, “If you see a man supplicating against the ruler, know that he is a person of desire (meaning a person from Ahlu Bidah), and if you see a man supplicating for the ruler, know that he is a Sunni (meaning from Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaah) inshallah.” (Sharh Al-Sunnah p113, 114))
(Copied from www.thekhalids.org) {To read the full article click on the reply option}
(Imam al-Khattaabee continues) All of this is based upon the fact that what is meant by the leader of the Muslims is the Caliph and other than him from the administrators who take charge of the affairs of the Muslims.”
Also Shaykh Abu Nu’aym al-Asbahaanee said, “Whoever advises the leaders and the rulers is guided, and whoever deceives them is misguided and has transgressed the bounds.”)
2. Advising the leader in front of the people outwardly in his presence while having the ability to advise him privately.
This is exposing (of the faults) and not advice (in reality). It is prohibited for the following reasons:
1. It opposes the hadeeth of I’yaad bin Ghanam.
(The Prophet said, “Whoever wants to advise a sultan (leader/ruler) with a matter, do not do it outwardly but let him take him by the hand and go into seclusion with him. If he accepts it from him then that (is good) and if not then he (the adviser) has fulfilled that which was upon him (to do).” Musnad of Ahmad, as-Sunnah of Ibn Abee Aa’sim, authenticated by al-Albaanee.)
2. It opposes the narrations of the salaf, as well as their methodology like we have seen in the narration of Usaamah bin Zayd (may Allaah be pleased with them both).
(The narration is: “Will you not enter upon Uthmaan and talk to him?” So he (Usaamah bin Zayd) said: “Do you see that I don’t talk to him except that I make you to hear (what I say to him)? By Allaah I have spoken to him in manner which was between me and him without opening an affair that I do not love to be the first one to open it.” Recorded in Bukhari 3267
From the salaf - In Aqeedah at-Tahawiyah of Imam Tahawi it says
“When changing the evil of the rulers, then this should be done by the scholars and not openly as is mentioned by a clear Ahaadeeth of the Prophet “When you wish to correct the sultan then take him by the hand in secret and advise him.”” The full length version of this hadeeth was reported by Ahmad (3/403) and Ibn Abee ‘Aasim in Kitaabus-Sunnah (2/251): ‘‘Chapter: How are the leaders of the common-folk to be advised?’’ (2/521) with a Saheeh isnad and it was authenticated by Shaykh al-Albaanee in Dhilaalul-Jannah fee Takhreejis-Sunnah (no. 1096))
3. It opposes the statement of the Prophet.
(The prophet said) “Whoever disgraced the ruler of Allah (by backbiting, slandering (lying) or twisting the truth about him) in the earth, Allaah will disgrace him.” at-Tirmidhee, authenticated by Imaam al-Albaanee
(In addition the story of Ibn Aamir when he was the Muslim ruler shows the impermissibility of disgracing the leader.
Once when Ibn Aamir was delivering a sermon and he was wearing a fine garment. So Abu Bilaal said ‘Look at our ruler wearing the garment of the sinners!’ So Abu Bakrah said ‘Be Silent!! I heard the Messenger of Allah say ” Whoever sends scorn upon the one whom Allah has given rulership to upon the earth, Allah will scorn him.’hasan by Shaykh Albaani in Ibn Abee Asim’s As Sunnah)
(Copied from www.thekhalids.org)