I have found that when I read something and write it I can retain it more better than I just hear it. I remember things better from discussing in Discussion groups also.
It 's quite great,helpful and interesting information for me before I 'll have to join the Active Learning Seminar" at work tomorrow morning. That's very kind of you. Thank you so much for let us join it.
I am in favor of instruction being evidence-based. I believe that there is a substantial amount of research that supports the use of active learning. Unfortunately, I am highly disappointed by the video. It is a necessary element in an academic paper or presentation that when you use “research” to support your point, the author discloses the actual source of the resech/paper/ or publication that is being referenced. In this case, the speaker refers to research “research shows...” however fails to source the information. So it is unclear if he is referring to multiple studies or reaching the conclusions from just the “learning pyramid.” The problem with the “learning pyramid” is that this is fake information, not actual research. This appears to be the result of secondary sourcing, meaning it appears that the author just searched google for his image however did not actually look at any research as he suggests since a study does not actually exist. It is not helpful to share research that does not exist; this negatively affects instructors and their understanding of learning. Here are a few references that would be helpful to understand the topic.
The advantages of an active classroom are clear. Thankfully, there is now a way to reuse existing content and gain the advantages of real time student input and aggregation, at netclick.mobi
Active learning HAS TO be more effective. Without all the research, we've all heard stories of some 7 or 8 year old who drove to school, down the street, or to a neighbor's house without ever READING a drivers manual, simply because they ACTually drove in a video game. Doing/action causes us to remember.
If active learning is "something other than straight lecture", then all current formal instruction is active learning. Straight lecture is never used alone in education. Why aren't reading and listening "doing something"? Saying that students must process information in specific ways simply assumes the goal. The actual issue is about how to promote such processing. The numbers giving percentages of what student's retain is well known misinformation that is supported by no research whatsoever. Overall, I have to wonder what motivates someone to create and post such misinformation. Active learning is basically smoke and mirrors used by people who want simple answers, or justification for their ideology.
Excellent Video about Active Learning!
Thank you
Where do you get your reasearch data? Do you mind publishing the links please?
very interesting ,informative video.will be very useful while handling children.
thank you for loading it on you tube
I have found that when I read something and write it I can retain it more better than I just hear it. I remember things better from discussing in Discussion groups also.
It 's quite great,helpful and interesting information for me before I 'll have to join the Active Learning Seminar" at work tomorrow morning. That's very kind of you. Thank you so much for let us join it.
Thanks for this nice information. It will help me in many ways. Thank you so much!!!!!
Good knowledge sharing us thanks
Thanks for the valueable information.
Thank you for this valuable resource.
I like that is very succinct, and provides examples!
active learning is the best way to get the burden off the teachers shoulders. thanks for the video
Hello, could you please confirm the source of the passive/active learning research?
Sue
interesting video and very informative
Great lesson you made!
This is GREAT! I don’t need to take out a $60,000 loan to go to university. We can just stay home, get into pairs, and do active learning.
Cyberlearning is a game changer, plain and simple.
How can I learn active by myself , when I prepare what my exams ?
great lesson but needs to be updated to add the existence of breakout rooms in the online environment
tks you
Very helpful. Does this sound the death knell for didactic teaching methods or does it still have a role/
Would depend on the students being taught as well as the content, right?
Thanks :-)
So how can we turn a math class into an active learning one? What's there in maths tp discuss?
You're very welcome! Glad I could help.
Thanks
Is there such a thing as passive learning? All learning is active, one might argue
A lecture/powerpoint lesson that chirps lectures and power point lessons.
i will like to learn passive learning as well
Active learning involves a student organizing and then presenting thoughts, vocally or typing or web video.
I am in favor of instruction being evidence-based. I believe that there is a substantial amount of research that supports the use of active learning. Unfortunately, I am highly disappointed by the video. It is a necessary element in an academic paper or presentation that when you use “research” to support your point, the author discloses the actual source of the resech/paper/ or publication that is being referenced. In this case, the speaker refers to research “research shows...” however fails to source the information. So it is unclear if he is referring to multiple studies or reaching the conclusions from just the “learning pyramid.” The problem with the “learning pyramid” is that this is fake information, not actual research. This appears to be the result of secondary sourcing, meaning it appears that the author just searched google for his image however did not actually look at any research as he suggests since a study does not actually exist. It is not helpful to share research that does not exist; this negatively affects instructors and their understanding of learning.
Here are a few references that would be helpful to understand the topic.
Artificial inteligent
Active VS Passive learning
The advantages of an active classroom are clear. Thankfully, there is now a way to reuse existing content and gain the advantages of real time student input and aggregation, at netclick.mobi
Active learning HAS TO be more effective. Without all the research, we've all heard stories of some 7 or 8 year old who drove to school, down the street, or to a neighbor's house without ever READING a drivers manual, simply because they ACTually drove in a video game.
Doing/action causes us to remember.
10 yr old video
If active learning is "something other than straight lecture", then all current formal instruction is active learning. Straight lecture is never used alone in education. Why aren't reading and listening "doing something"? Saying that students must process information in specific ways simply assumes the goal. The actual issue is about how to promote such processing. The numbers giving percentages of what student's retain is well known misinformation that is supported by no research whatsoever. Overall, I have to wonder what motivates someone to create and post such misinformation. Active learning is basically smoke and mirrors used by people who want simple answers, or justification for their ideology.
a