They are people of equal intelligence and human-ness. Nobody is pure and innocent, it’s not in human nature. Why do you think natives ought to be noble? Exactly and in what situation are you thinking of them demonstrating that
Thank you so much for the work you do to present true history. So eye opening, tragic and painful to hear about US soldiers carrying out the brutal murders of native people.
What always gets me is that I well remember my great grandfather who was born in 1871. These events were only 15-or-so decades ago. Think about how fast the last 10 years of your life have gone by....15 decades is not that long ago.
IDK about the soo side but they were giving them to the squaws which was the worst fate. They didn't do anything to Custer because they respected him but they were merciless to soldiers
*Sioux* not soo, and squaw is a slur, to communicate non human-ness same as whites calling native men Savages, teenagers, Bucks and babies Papoose. Whites will argue that they are getting these names from native languages, but that excuse still doesn’t work, no other language do you call the different category of people names in their language but use it to refer to them not to communicate with them, and in no other instance than with natives does this happen.
I enjoyed the video,as always, but don’t know how I feel about reading from modern books instead of your regular period ones. The part about all soldiers killing themselves I think in particular is not true, maybe some but not many
Yeah I don’t think it was as common as Kate Bighead’s narrative stated. I should have mentioned it in the video, but Thomas Marquis was the one who interviewed the Cheyennes in the 1920s and published these narratives, and he was the one who spread this theory. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Bailey_Marquis
There is NO real evidence that she fought Custer and she was NOT a warrior. She also didn’t fight at Rosebud. She did rescue her brother at the Rosebud but that is it. All the other stuff about her being on multiple battles as a warrior are myths
Good to hear more history from the indigenous perspective.
They were pure innocent and noble. All of them.
@@calebjames8291 always Dances with Wolves never Black Robe
They are people of equal intelligence and human-ness. Nobody is pure and innocent, it’s not in human nature. Why do you think natives ought to be noble? Exactly and in what situation are you thinking of them demonstrating that
criminals always blame those who try to stop crimes. "Indians way of life" smh, raping others and the land, raiding others ....
Thank you brother. Jesus bless our nation.
Great story as always thanks.
I am glad you finally have some indigenous side of the story. I have missed that in the other stories.
The names are so literal. I don't imagine that I would appreciate being known as big head. Also, iron teeth & crooked nose
Thanks again UH!
Thank you so much for the work you do to present true history. So eye opening, tragic and painful to hear about US soldiers carrying out the brutal murders of native people.
What always gets me is that I well remember my great grandfather who was born in 1871. These events were only 15-or-so decades ago. Think about how fast the last 10 years of your life have gone by....15 decades is not that long ago.
Custer had it coming ❤
Only The Dead can tell the true Tale!
IDK about the soo side but they were giving them to the squaws which was the worst fate. They didn't do anything to Custer because they respected him but they were merciless to soldiers
*Sioux* not soo, and squaw is a slur, to communicate non human-ness same as whites calling native men Savages, teenagers, Bucks and babies Papoose. Whites will argue that they are getting these names from native languages, but that excuse still doesn’t work, no other language do you call the different category of people names in their language but use it to refer to them not to communicate with them, and in no other instance than with natives does this happen.
I enjoyed the video,as always, but don’t know how I feel about reading from modern books instead of your regular period ones.
The part about all soldiers killing themselves I think in particular is not true, maybe some but not many
Yeah I don’t think it was as common as Kate Bighead’s narrative stated. I should have mentioned it in the video, but Thomas Marquis was the one who interviewed the Cheyennes in the 1920s and published these narratives, and he was the one who spread this theory. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Bailey_Marquis
Oklahoma or death, it's really no choice at all
What was his name @#00:43? Wonder how many kids he had?😂
There is NO real evidence that she fought Custer and she was NOT a warrior. She also didn’t fight at Rosebud. She did rescue her brother at the Rosebud but that is it. All the other stuff about her being on multiple battles as a warrior are myths
Cumz in sides. Best Indian name ever.