Johnny Depp Lawyer DESTROYS LYING Amber Heard Psychologist | Asmongold Reacts

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 พ.ค. 2022
  • Asmongold Reacts to Johnny Depp defamation trial, Amber Heard expert gets caught LYING UNDER OATH, Johnny Depp's Lawyer Grills Amber Heard's Psychologist Over Diagnosis Procedure, Johnny Depp trial: Amber Heard psychologist accused of not using tests properly, Johnny Depp trial final week
    ► Asmongold's Twitch: / asmongold
    ► Asmongold's Twitter: / asmongold
    ► Asmongold's 2nd YT Channel: / zackrawrr
    ► Asmongold's Sub-Reddit: / asmongold
    Thank you all for watching! Stay tuned and subscribe to the official Asmongold TH-cam Channel to always be kept up to date about the best Asmongold Highlights, Asmongold Reacts and funniest Asmongold moments from World of Warcraft, Elden Ring, Lost Ark, Final Fantasy 14 (FFXIV) and other games played on stream!
    Channel Editors: CatDany & Daily Dose of Asmongold
    ► 🎸 Outro song: CatDany - Get Enough
    If you own the copyright of content showed in this video and would like it to be removed or the Ad-Revenue made from it please contact::
    ► / catdanyru

    #Asmongold
  • เกม

ความคิดเห็น • 3K

  • @tocadiscox3
    @tocadiscox3 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3295

    The amount of "experts" this lawyer has taken down all by himself is simply impressive.

    • @littlelily831
      @littlelily831 2 ปีที่แล้ว +263

      Ultimate final boss.

    • @booleah6357
      @booleah6357 2 ปีที่แล้ว +473

      The wizard slayer is my favorite character in this anime

    • @jeremiahmoynihan861
      @jeremiahmoynihan861 2 ปีที่แล้ว +84

      It is, but he does have a team.

    • @DanyPell
      @DanyPell 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      lmfao

    • @demoulius1529
      @demoulius1529 2 ปีที่แล้ว +148

      At the end of this whole shitshow he will have a bodycount xD

  • @ariamaddison257
    @ariamaddison257 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1005

    This woman was able to talk a lot while saying nothing at the same time. To her credit she is in fact an expert, a word salad expert.

    • @petertyper1
      @petertyper1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Lmao

    • @theresaheywood9479
      @theresaheywood9479 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      🤣🤣😅🤣

    • @Whitey23
      @Whitey23 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Exacly

    • @hmcredfed1836
      @hmcredfed1836 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      isn't that woman conversation standarts? "able to talk a lot while saying nothing at the same time".

    • @hoang2312
      @hoang2312 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      So basically a female Eric Dyson

  • @dll7658
    @dll7658 2 ปีที่แล้ว +585

    Imagine - 25 years for a woman working so unprofessionally like that - just imagine all the innocent men and women whose cases have been negatively affected by her personal, unprofessional conduct. Not everyone has a good lawyer team like Johnny.

    • @claudiagerber2921
      @claudiagerber2921 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      That’s chilling!

    • @annacostello5181
      @annacostello5181 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      Oh I worked as a psych nurse. A certain subset of counselors/therapists are in the field to deal with their own psych issues (subconsciously). They can’t see their own inadequacy and mostly no one will ever call them out

    • @dll7658
      @dll7658 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@claudiagerber2921 It is.

    • @gailtrotman6843
      @gailtrotman6843 ปีที่แล้ว

      Especially men! She has a hate on for all men AND because of her biases against male Johnny Depp, she did not want to know the real Amber so she used shortcuts in her psychometric testing! Then, she listened to pathological liar, Amber Heard's self-reporting! She never met Amber in person, but did all her interviewing by ZOOM! THEN she was caught delivering her findings with notes! Now she wants to criticize Dr. Curry who brilliantly delivered a Master Class on Psychometric Testing, Mental Illnesses, Borderline Personality Disorder and Amber Heard's diagnosis specifically. I wonder if her license is being reviewed.

    • @izzeypally
      @izzeypally ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@katty5003 lol. asses. 🤣 sorry. I'll go away.

  • @dominiccampbell181
    @dominiccampbell181 2 ปีที่แล้ว +425

    I find it absolutely amazing that Amber's expert witnesses all seem to be horrible people in their own rights.

    • @Argumemnon
      @Argumemnon ปีที่แล้ว +23

      I find it entirely expected.

    • @Lei-AICPhD
      @Lei-AICPhD ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Right? And so rude! Like they’re already synced up with Elaine and Rottenborn as friends and willing to say or do whatever

    • @ohmygodbecky6829
      @ohmygodbecky6829 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      When you hire people who will do anything for 💸💸💸, you collect a …specific crowd.

    • @mariasondell3613
      @mariasondell3613 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Amen

    • @jennyjohnson9579
      @jennyjohnson9579 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Lei-AICPhD Exactly!

  • @SoTurtles
    @SoTurtles 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3706

    the fact that she's considered board certified is terrifying to me

    • @shahrezaDE
      @shahrezaDE 2 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      💯💯

    • @guardry1605
      @guardry1605 2 ปีที่แล้ว +201

      After this she might not be for long

    • @italiangirl2789
      @italiangirl2789 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Right? LOL

    • @Bornintoclusterb
      @Bornintoclusterb 2 ปีที่แล้ว +104

      Which is why it’s so hilarious that AH legal team keeps emphasizing that she’s board certified and Curry isn’t. 🤡🤡

    • @guardry1605
      @guardry1605 2 ปีที่แล้ว +104

      @Do Not Lie Just as a board of phychiatrists can certify that she is professional and has a certain level of expertise within clinical psychology, they are just as easily able to remove their certification, if she's proven to have lied or bent the truth they could decide that she is too unprofessional and they can no longer guarantee that she can deliver a certain level of service to clients, they can meet and rescind the certification :)

  • @dreadxcii2403
    @dreadxcii2403 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3093

    The biggest takeaway I've had from this trial is that anyone can call themselves an expert

    • @tonyrock123
      @tonyrock123 2 ปีที่แล้ว +46

      yes I earned thousands of dollars doing it. I'm in the wrong career
      Edit': and they earn thousands of dollars doing it.....
      I voice texted that one

    • @MJans
      @MJans 2 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      this is true. Its not a protected title and is only validified per situation and the criteria to judge the title differ situationally.

    • @ryanchaney6226
      @ryanchaney6226 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      lol I totally agree. I have discovered that it seems as though all experts are trying to say alot of big words to try and trick me into believing their bs.

    • @i_have_a_coat
      @i_have_a_coat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      And if Mr. Dennison is around to hear that claim, he will shut that human being down.

    • @ka.ka4325
      @ka.ka4325 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      True and an expert seems to be the most confident in their own mind even if they're incorrect. I'm taking notes lol

  • @chasitycaviness9057
    @chasitycaviness9057 2 ปีที่แล้ว +472

    As someone with a degree in psychology, I am appalled. She needs to be investigated, and any case she was a witness for needs to deemed a mistrial.

    • @michellestrachan372
      @michellestrachan372 2 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      I was hoping to see someone who is in this field to comment bc I don't have psychology degree or background but this lady shouldn't be on any stand unless it was her being sued by clients she misled

    • @rebekahvasquez1464
      @rebekahvasquez1464 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      I hope they aren't given a mistrial, but perhaps they should. I only say I hope not because she was an expert witness before this in the R Kelly case.

    • @OOzd95
      @OOzd95 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Degree in Psychology? A Venti Latte please.

    • @andreatakaki
      @andreatakaki ปีที่แล้ว

      Unfortunately her “testimony” would not warrant a mistrial.

    • @andreatakaki
      @andreatakaki ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@rebekahvasquez1464
      Her “testimony”, unfortunately would not legally warrant a mistrial.

  • @furlycee
    @furlycee 2 ปีที่แล้ว +418

    I just graduated with a master’s in forensic psychology and currently the field is very skeptical about violent risk assessment and the ethics of “predicting risks”, which is what this lady sounds like she’s using. Dr. Curry used the MMPI which is probably the most clinical, widely researched, and comprehensive of clinical tests today and Dr Curry interpreted those results incredibly nuanced and professionally.

    • @vickywitton1008
      @vickywitton1008 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Well done you!🎓

    • @KayKay114
      @KayKay114 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      I think that's what Dr. Curry said about those tests as well. I thought she was wonderful 🥰

    • @pamelaedwards6414
      @pamelaedwards6414 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ok.

    • @pamelaedwards6414
      @pamelaedwards6414 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Congratulations!! Reach for YOUR STARS!!!

    • @Movu
      @Movu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Congrats on graduating!

  • @Jarzula
    @Jarzula 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1097

    I seriously hope all the “experts” who lied on behalf of AH get their license suspended for a time. I don’t think they’re bad at their job, but they do need a reminder that it is NOT OK TO LIE IN COURT

    • @actors504
      @actors504 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      ARE YOU KIDDING THEY SUCK

    • @toshiroyamada2443
      @toshiroyamada2443 2 ปีที่แล้ว +63

      Yea having a clear bias against men as a psychologist is defiantly how you should behave as a medical professional.

    • @sp00kyd4ddy6
      @sp00kyd4ddy6 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@Dan.Hibiki and how does jail time not get them suspended

    • @pale_saint
      @pale_saint 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No they’re useless in their jobs when they’re ready to twist the truth and manipulate results for a liar

    • @CaspiRose99
      @CaspiRose99 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@sp00kyd4ddy6 I mean I'm not sure if it does or not. Not practicing isn't the same as having your medical license suspended.

  • @randyho8315
    @randyho8315 2 ปีที่แล้ว +532

    This woman is the reason why there are a lot of innocent people in jail

  • @bezwaarikteken6637
    @bezwaarikteken6637 2 ปีที่แล้ว +274

    She ‘radiates’ very negative energy, she’s quick to defend when she’s asked a question, she’s demeaning when she’s responding to Depp’s lawyer and she shows signs of not being completely honest.

    • @gailtrotman6843
      @gailtrotman6843 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Yes, very defensive and not sure what the constant crimson color of her face is all about - anger and defensiveness? Aware that she was not fully professional cut corners with Amber every way she could? The two parties at hand are celebrities with JD being world renowned. His life, reputation and future are on the line and she's administering 1/2 assed tests and notating quote "DV Johnny" after ticking Yes, 5 times accusing Johnny of Amber's lies! Her license should be reviewed!

    • @bobbicatt
      @bobbicatt ปีที่แล้ว +6

      The amount of disdain and contempt on her face as she speaks is significant.

    • @lordsathariel4384
      @lordsathariel4384 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@gailtrotman6843 after going through a couple of therapists the one who got me out of my depression explained to me a good amount of counselors/therapists pychiatrists an psychologists actually have some form of pychological instabilty or some other issue or variant and gravitate towards the feild based on that but she was really helpful dealing with my depression and made me realise that what i was experiancing was a form of ptsd. i think the one's who go into the feild without issues are probs gonna be the most helpful

    • @ohmygodbecky6829
      @ohmygodbecky6829 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You would think someone who works in psy would have a calmer and more peaceful mind, you know, like a HEALTHY MIND. But she seems constantly irritated or dissatisfied? Like the type that doesn’t take care of herself or others and is living like a bitter divorcee…and this person is board certified…
      This is like seeing a board certified dentist with gum piercings, a fake gold tooth, and lining their teeth with sugar as a snack before getting to work on you LMAO 😂

    • @CorporateG0th
      @CorporateG0th หลายเดือนก่อน

      He's using it against her. I'm just watching this now and 30:00 I'm calling it before I watch the rest, he's giving her rope to hang herself. He's getting her to strongly argue that the test can be applied retroactively over an indefinite period. His next move will be to argue, that she argued, that the results of the test can indicate trauma from the relationship or any other part of her youth.

  • @dickfitswell3437
    @dickfitswell3437 2 ปีที่แล้ว +107

    0:23 she calls her "Shannon Curry" and not "Doctor Curry." what a low blow. Doctors have to be professional and Dr Curry was always professional even when AHs old decrepit female Lawyer was being a outrageous jerk

    • @lindamccane4404
      @lindamccane4404 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      I can’t call this pit stain anything but Hughes.

    • @stephenheffren4324
      @stephenheffren4324 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lindamccane4404 her ego is Hughes-mongous.
      Not sorry.

    • @merciajean6959
      @merciajean6959 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Wow nice catch!!! 👌

  • @anthonygomez3915
    @anthonygomez3915 2 ปีที่แล้ว +637

    Curry, even after everything, still called her Dr. Hughes. She’s calling her Shannon the first time she addresses her. Subtle hints as to how unprofessional these “experts” from Ambers side are.

    • @thechoseone456
      @thechoseone456 2 ปีที่แล้ว +53

      Board certification is a joke. Hell, most doctorates are a joke.

    • @Aeternus75
      @Aeternus75 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@thechoseone456 literally every doctorate you need medical school for beg to differ. God forbid we had incompetent surgeons or most doctors like that in general (If we did we likely wouldn’t be here.)

    • @revelationreflection
      @revelationreflection 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Telling, she was mad

    • @LA-mz1dd
      @LA-mz1dd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      She also referred to all victims as female. Absolutely telling

    • @MoonBeamLight
      @MoonBeamLight 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      @@Aeternus75 You clearly don't understand what board certification truly is or means. Not having one doesn't make you NOT a doctor or a professional.

  • @orchidsdance
    @orchidsdance 2 ปีที่แล้ว +188

    I watched my mom go through domestic abuse when I was young. When there was an incident, my mom never antagonized her abuser. AH, in all the audio, antagonizes Johnny. She never seems like she is cowering or trying to get away from the abuse. In fact, running after her alleged abuser when he tries to get away. That is what really hits home for me.

    • @kelliintexas3575
      @kelliintexas3575 2 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      EXACTLY. My dad was emotionally abusive to everyone, we learned how to tiptoe around, avoid conversations, avoid his "triggers". We sure as hell NEVER tried to set him off. We were only screamed at, berated & cussed out. Being "punched with rings repeatedly" you would be INSANE.

    • @dustinrausch5008
      @dustinrausch5008 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@solea4945 And that's acting as if the concept of nuance doesn't exist.
      This was not a matter of Depp being shown to be repeatedly abusive and Amber being caught in one instance of fighting back; if anything, it's the opposite. Amber has shown a pattern of displaying absolutely no fear or anything even close to it in relation to Depp, save for one very obviously overplayed moment (at least only one I remember seeing), from the evidence we've seen to her behavior throughout the trial itself.

    • @hilmaallen1302
      @hilmaallen1302 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      To me the person that was abused in this relationship and there was abuse, was Johnny Depp. He was the one trying to get away from his abuser. Johnny Depp never used to wear make-up before he met Amber Heard in public, ie: in normal life. Look back at his previous pictures with his other partners yet from he started his relationship with her he was always seen in public with make up on, people should think on that.

    • @anastasiaconde2839
      @anastasiaconde2839 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Mines was her admitting to hitting him on recording. She sounded proud and defended the way in which she hit him that was a "Oh yea! she's the abuser.

  • @TheSinner1123
    @TheSinner1123 2 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    While obtaining my BS in psychology, i did an internship at a childrens hospital. I was able to assist in administering these types (not specifically these) of tests to clients. One time, i neglected to fill in a box due to the question not pertaining to the client(i did not administer the test, simply assisted). The psychologist i was interning with GRILLED me to NEVER leave a box plank. The psychologist lectured me for what felt like hours, on why you never leave ANY box blank, no matter how insignificant it may be.
    My education on these tests are limited, and my scope of the field is limited. But the one thing I can say for certain, is that failing to document anything in those boxes, is negligence and malpractice.

  • @fabulousat40beauty
    @fabulousat40beauty 2 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    I am a nurse , and was assulted by a patient in december . I was brutally beaten, and now have real ptsd. When i was referred to my psychologist, i was given a survey to fill out about my symptoms. Then i was tested on many different things. I had to undergo memory testing, such as “ how many things can you name with the letter d “ just as an example. Telling me a passage of words , ans after a min of being told them was asked to repeat. This woman is manipulating her results. And trying to save her ass

    • @BK-uf6qr
      @BK-uf6qr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Hope your better or getting better.

    • @fabulousat40beauty
      @fabulousat40beauty 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@BK-uf6qr tysm! I’m in therapy, still dealing with pretty severe ptsd. But trying. Stay blessed🙏

  • @booleah6357
    @booleah6357 2 ปีที่แล้ว +516

    Ah but the real failure of this therapist is she didn't even talk to Johnny but tried to diagnose him and assume him to be the abuser. Pretty sure that's unethical and now that we learned about from Johnny's friendly psych it violates the Goldwater rule pretty hard.

    • @mannymaurice972
      @mannymaurice972 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      She’s violating everything just like Amber !

    • @alexbarn3841
      @alexbarn3841 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      Well really it’s not her diagnosing him, it’s about her just stating that domestic abuse absolutely happened and that it was perpetrated by Johnny, which is simply something that psychologists can’t possibly know.

    • @burimsaliji23
      @burimsaliji23 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      So true 😆 hope truth wins ,that's important 🙂

    • @johnstrawb3521
      @johnstrawb3521 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @Booleah Not a big believer in "the Goldwater Rule" as there are many occasions when it should be rejected, but the contrast here between the slug on the stand versus Dr. Curry and her detailed, supported diagnosis of Heard is really quite shocking. Depp's friends and witnesses are restrained, competent, appear honest and forthright, whereas Heard's look like carnies out for your last buck.

    • @Kim-tr5op
      @Kim-tr5op 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@alexbarn3841 no she gave a professional opinion about Johnny Depp without doing any research herself

  • @edwardnguyen7913
    @edwardnguyen7913 2 ปีที่แล้ว +240

    I like it when the psychiatrist kept talking about guidline until JD's lawyer threw the guidline at her face. Totally boss move.

    • @bobbicatt
      @bobbicatt ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Just a FYI… She is not a psychiatrist she is a psychologist huge difference.

    • @witchcraftdahlia4789
      @witchcraftdahlia4789 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@bobbicatt The only REAL difference between the professions is that psychiatrists can prescribe medication and psychologists only evaluate.

    • @marie-michelleanderson2851
      @marie-michelleanderson2851 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@witchcraftdahlia4789 Bigger difference is that psychiatrists are actually medical doctors as well. That is why they can prescribe medications.

    • @THETowandAA
      @THETowandAA ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I would have loved for him to go to the pourcentile part " you said Dr Curry had to just read the manual to know you don't use the pourcentile in this test .... the fuck it is ?"

    • @TheHappyPotatoe
      @TheHappyPotatoe 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yup she quickly changed her tune on guidelines then lol

  • @ultikfa8971
    @ultikfa8971 2 ปีที่แล้ว +103

    So, Dr. Hughes used a test that it specifically designed to evaluate the PAST YEAR of a relationship, but she used this test for a different date of her choosing? Wouldn't this be malpractice? The instruction manual sounds pretty clear to me. There is probably a good reason why the instructions say to use it ONLY for the past year, right? They don't just write such specific stuff in there for fun, RIGHT?

    • @meggers1771
      @meggers1771 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Not only can the symptoms change, but there can also be other events that contribute to the results of the test. Having it be within a year of administering the test is incredibly important. She's not a dumb woman, she knows this and is talking around it. People will say whatever you want them to for money its gross.

    • @Digmer
      @Digmer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Past year, her thinking was "welp, 5 years ago was a pasr year so lets do it"

  • @Enigma9Sigma
    @Enigma9Sigma 2 ปีที่แล้ว +322

    Law firms actually have lawyers like this specifically - They are called known as “A Fixer”
    And this man is doing a fabulous job of demonstrating the art of “fixing” & illustrating exactly how brutally effective they can be to a legal team…. A Master Class.

    • @TheTownNarcoleptic
      @TheTownNarcoleptic ปีที่แล้ว +26

      So they’re the guys who set the record straight? Damn. I’d be sweating up a storm testifying in any court case if I knew that I was gonna be cross-examined by the opposing team’s fixer.

    • @Enigma9Sigma
      @Enigma9Sigma ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@TheTownNarcoleptic absolutely - This guy really was a super valuable secret weapon

    • @voids4818
      @voids4818 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@Enigma9Sigma Dennison is a wonderful attorney. He destroyed most of AH’s “experts” with ease.

    • @piratequeenucyra6690
      @piratequeenucyra6690 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wait...so the show scandal was real? :D

  • @ffeeniixx7194
    @ffeeniixx7194 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1468

    Amber's face is priceless. She's like we have one hour left and instead of defending me she's defending her own reputation. Even she's sick of hearing this woman talk

    • @0ggyMild
      @0ggyMild 2 ปีที่แล้ว +103

      Bro Ambers reputation is relying on her reputation 😅 She needs the jurry to be convinced her expert isnt full of shit.

    • @rsdouglass4
      @rsdouglass4 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Bingo

    • @manchovieclemmons2380
      @manchovieclemmons2380 2 ปีที่แล้ว +54

      People tend to drift towards those who are like-minded, this is the result.

    • @oguz091
      @oguz091 2 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      She looks like a future version of A.H, well the personality is already matching and looks wise A.H will come close in a few years.

    • @candygirl7030
      @candygirl7030 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Agree 💯

  • @charlesc4511
    @charlesc4511 2 ปีที่แล้ว +568

    I wonder if she thinks it worth destroying her career over Amber Heard.

    • @jordyjohn2275
      @jordyjohn2275 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      There’s always a market for mercenaries like her. Not everyone has a crack legal team like JD

    • @Tungsten96
      @Tungsten96 2 ปีที่แล้ว +55

      She's getting paid in Elon credits. 🤣

    • @randomperson-up5vt
      @randomperson-up5vt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +49

      Oh her ego is what's fueling her. She hates being called out.

    • @SereneAncalime
      @SereneAncalime 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Nah as per the first round of questioning.
      This is her job. She well keep getting hired for the exact same cases forever

    • @hawaiifiveohoh
      @hawaiifiveohoh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Ego is a helluva *drug

  • @jenclark777
    @jenclark777 2 ปีที่แล้ว +110

    That "expert" is so wrong. That lady is so lying. I've been through the whole PTSD testing twice because I moved and had to change doctors. What she said is a full legal assessment is not.

  • @aaronmichelson5510
    @aaronmichelson5510 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Clinical psychologist here. I've done hundreds of C&P evaluations with veterans (non-forensic). First off, Hughes is an embarrassment to the profession, while Curry is a gem - she was fantastic. Second, Hughes thought she could give a bunch of clinical assessments for a forensic setting (other than maybe the PAI), while Curry used THE gold standard MMPI-2. Third, Hughes did not complete the CAPS-5 correctly, so it is invalid. (The PCL-5 is a joke for a forensic setting, especially with a pathological liar.) The first question in the CAPS-5 is VERY specific about index trauma, which means you have to clearly state the event that caused the trauma (e.g., a combat veteran who was shot in the leg during an ambush; sexual assault on X date; learned about your child being killed in a drive-by; etc.).
    "Complex trauma" is not exactly a thing (not in the DSM-5-TR), and usually refers to childhood trauma over a long period of time. Currently though, PTSD is related to one index event. Lastly, Hughes was correct about Curry overstating how debilitating PTSD is. PTSD exists on a spectrum, so somebody can still meet criteria and function very well. That is why in the VA we have a rating system for compensation (0/10/30/50/70/100%). Borderline Personality Disorder is usually associated with past trauma, so it's plausible that Amber does have a history of trauma. That is why it was so egregious to not specify the index trauma in the CAPS-5. Hughes disgusts me, for multiple reasons...

    • @Fluer-de-Lis
      @Fluer-de-Lis 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thank you for this very detailed and professional insight.

    • @jbritneff
      @jbritneff 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Very interesting, thanks for the insider explanations

  • @rlawrence9838
    @rlawrence9838 2 ปีที่แล้ว +179

    It would've saved us a lot of time if this woman had just said, "I'm stupid enough to believe Amber Heard, Dr Curry isn't.

    • @mannymaurice972
      @mannymaurice972 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      💯

    • @ri9596
      @ri9596 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Absolutely 👍

    • @B4L-777
      @B4L-777 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Especially given the fact she gave her the "answers" and asked if she "feels" any of these. A self-assessment. What a joke.

    • @mannymaurice972
      @mannymaurice972 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@B4L-777 and years after she was with Johnny and had already been with Elon ! And pregnant lol

    • @rlawrence9838
      @rlawrence9838 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mannymaurice972 She was never pregnant, the baby was had by a surrogate. And I've only heard people online express concern for the child's well-being, not threaten it, I'm not saying it's impossible but it is Amber (my lies are finally being) Heard.

  • @irollneed
    @irollneed 2 ปีที่แล้ว +87

    Johnny Depp's lawyer has earned the *Expert Destroyer* title! What a legend!

    • @petertyper1
      @petertyper1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He’s a son of a gun

  • @newbienorris
    @newbienorris 2 ปีที่แล้ว +67

    Wayne has such a brilliant way of making the witnesses look like idiots 🤣🤣👌

  • @debrabarber3483
    @debrabarber3483 2 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    She didn't even fill in the form right. That's next level unethical. She should lose her licence for that alone

  • @philip9823
    @philip9823 2 ปีที่แล้ว +316

    When an academic expert calls another expert “confused,” it’s a pretty big diss. She needs to calm herself down.

    • @sharonhudzick9433
      @sharonhudzick9433 2 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      It’s extremely unprofessional….if I was a juror I would discount anything she says due to the lack of professionalism

    • @optimusgrine2362
      @optimusgrine2362 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Did not refer to her as ‘Doctor’ Curry, only Shannon Curry. The ❤️’ly Dr Shannon Curry completely slow rolled this woman

    • @Lemieux_7
      @Lemieux_7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Her insults come back on her

  • @ffeeniixx7194
    @ffeeniixx7194 2 ปีที่แล้ว +358

    This "expert" has such a beef with Dr curry. She's setting herself up as the villain in an epic anime where curry destroys her with verbal beat downs

    • @FEKana
      @FEKana 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@fish5645 Not sure what her appearance has to do with her testimony being awful but that isn't the point. Doctor Curry is just far more articulate and doesn't try to seem condescending unlike this psychologist

    • @moonlitskylight5740
      @moonlitskylight5740 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@FEKana well, it's shallow yes, but humans are physical beings. It's 95% her intelligence and professionalism, but she's also gorgeous.

    • @idrissb9742
      @idrissb9742 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@moonlitskylight5740 exactly, it helps to be goodlooking in this world and it WILL affect opinions :p

    • @stephanieann6622
      @stephanieann6622 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Exactly. She's not even caring about her patients. It's about the beef. Not them

    • @Axelvoxel
      @Axelvoxel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Because she’s prettier. Deep down it’s the only reason

  • @Fatemaforlife
    @Fatemaforlife 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Ironically her taking the stand actually helped Depp's case a lot.

    • @Bama_girl_41
      @Bama_girl_41 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      As with many of AH's professional witnesses.

  • @Ara_Arasaka
    @Ara_Arasaka ปีที่แล้ว +84

    I hope nothing but the worst for “doctor” Hughes. Genuinely.
    What a dangerous woman.
    To be in a position like that and be giving out wrong tests, miscategorizing and mistreating patients potentially with mind altering drugs they don’t even need just because she has an obvious agenda.
    That’s horrible.
    She and all of Amber’s team should be investigated. Thoroughly. These people are DANGEROUS.

    • @lindacousins9603
      @lindacousins9603 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I can imagine she it used by authorities, I hope now families will ask for her to be replaced

    • @bobbicatt
      @bobbicatt ปีที่แล้ว

      I totally agree with everything you stated . Dr. h is one more person who’s career and life have been destroyed because they decided to try to protect a liar, blackmailer, all around evil woman. What a waste of time . She clearly is an angry woman pushing an agenda . She also comes off very unlikable. She was there to clear her name. As I type this, Dennison still hasn’t done his cross I can’t wait to hear this again.

  • @matthewserrao2926
    @matthewserrao2926 2 ปีที่แล้ว +722

    Crazy how Amber has shown no symptoms of PTSD while hearing her alleged abuse recounted or while recounting it herself. I’ve never seen a victim of PTSD openly able to discuss and hear the causation of their PTSD discussed without any symptoms emerging. How odd

    • @officialmkamzeemwatela
      @officialmkamzeemwatela 2 ปีที่แล้ว +85

      Right? It’s almost like she’s….. lying?😳🤣

    • @2wyzegaming97
      @2wyzegaming97 2 ปีที่แล้ว +74

      Honestly I’ve been around victims
      They don’t exactly struggle to shed real tears 🙄

    • @bosmatzaidenband7865
      @bosmatzaidenband7865 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      i think she tried to make it look like she has PTSD (it was when johnny was "assulting" cabinantes i think)

    • @stephanieann6622
      @stephanieann6622 2 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      Staring at her victim smirking at him. Such PTSD. I can't even listen to my assaulters songs, see his face, hear his name without having PTSD "flare ups"

    • @Jarzula
      @Jarzula 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@bosmatzaidenband7865 I seen that. She really twitched but it was on demand and wasn’t random. She even tried to zone out at one point when they were explaining it last time but she failed because she has them “coke eyes” and they’re all over the place. Idk the actual term but people who do drugs do have REM that they don’t even notice or feel.

  • @TheOnlyCarlos
    @TheOnlyCarlos 2 ปีที่แล้ว +112

    So she purposely used tests that benefitted or would give AH the best chance at receiving the results they were looking for? Not only is that unethical, she literally outed herself to disregarding the rules set to make sure that patients are properly diagnosed. Imagine a surgical doctor doing this same exact thing, " I know this sheet states to only look at the past year but I instructed the patient to use their whole life as a timeframe and determined they need open heart surgery within the next week or they'll die ". I wouldn't be surprised if she gets investigated for falsifying her records tbh, Imagine the people she misdiagnoses or doesn't diagnose properly just because she instructs them to do something other than what is stated on the test themselves.

    • @skagenpige88
      @skagenpige88 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The problem here is that in most trials those things work, normal people cant afford lawyers like Depp could...and she gets away with all of it for an amazing salery and ruin ppl's lives.

  • @stasianitzouvara3114
    @stasianitzouvara3114 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I've watched this trial so many times and I still get the same satisfaction watching the wizard destroyer into action. *chef's kiss*

  • @mollyvital
    @mollyvital ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Johnnys Attorney deserved way way way more attention and praise, he was very impressive!!! 😮

  • @Retrobeemer
    @Retrobeemer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +814

    The arrogance of this woman is seriously next level. The rules simply don’t apply to her, or so she believes. Her notes were lies relayed to her by AH and nothing more.

    • @amyd369
      @amyd369 2 ปีที่แล้ว +49

      In this field the biggest thing is paperwork paperwork paperwork. For her not to fill it out is insulting to us who do

    • @JohnnyTromboner
      @JohnnyTromboner 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      I especially like how her face got more and more red lol

    • @WaitingForYukiOnna
      @WaitingForYukiOnna 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don't think her notes were the problem. It's that her testimony is very inconsistent with our observations of Amber Heard's behavior during the 26 days of trial. Conversely, Dr. Curry, whom she is adamant is wrong basically predicted everything Amber would do in the trial like it was a prophecy. It makes Dr. Hughes look highly incompetent.

    • @AfricanLionBat
      @AfricanLionBat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      The thumbnail for this video is fantastic

    • @evieparrott
      @evieparrott 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Plus how do we know her notes follow the standards! This so called professional needs to get a grip

  • @AleisterCrowleyMagus
    @AleisterCrowleyMagus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +384

    This woman is WRONG - there *are* patients who “malinger” by feigning symptoms particular to a specific condition. She is trying to claim that they makes all sorts of claims - not necessarily specific. That is just wrong. She is also irritating, obviously in a bad mood (not very professional), and a poor speaker, and I hope the jury is tuning her out.

    • @eddypuentes6155
      @eddypuentes6155 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      aleister crowley you can't argue with this woman she's an expert. This is what an expert like her looks like ---> 🤥 🤡.

    • @mtaus7337
      @mtaus7337 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      haha, like there is no such patients who malinger symptoms to for eg. achive perscriptions for some drugs like aderal, or such xD not-at-all.

    • @jawaragreaves6220
      @jawaragreaves6220 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's what I find funny she basically said curry isn't wrong but is trying to prove her side is right I'm lost

    • @dustinrausch5008
      @dustinrausch5008 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      This case is also being streamed by a lawtuber called Emily D. Baker, and after the testimonies on this day, she talked to another lawtuber for awhile, a guy called Runkle of the Bailey, who's actually been present in the courtroom (for this day, he's the guy in the blue suit with long white hair; at the start of this video you can see him right past Elaine).
      Anyway, he was largely there to gauge the jury responses; apparently, none of them seemed very convinced by Hughes, and at least one was shaking her head a lot throughout her testimony.

    • @jennifermarshall4780
      @jennifermarshall4780 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I agree. Karla Homolka perfect example of this!

  • @norakennedy4670
    @norakennedy4670 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    This lawyer.....deserved way more credit than he got. I think he had th hardest job out of all the other lawyers.

  • @vickywitton1008
    @vickywitton1008 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Love the fact that so many professionals are calling her a charlatan!

  • @Heydan164
    @Heydan164 2 ปีที่แล้ว +108

    I love how that one Wizard Destroyer's roll in all this is to be the expert of experts and put their fraudulent claims out there to the world. The guy is a friggin legend.

  • @Seaneey
    @Seaneey 2 ปีที่แล้ว +95

    This made her look even less credible than before.

  • @bloodyneptune
    @bloodyneptune 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    You can't just take a test _designed_ for evaluating PTSD from the last year and alter it to be for multiple years, the test no longer works. You need to use a _different_ test designed for the situation

    • @stephenheffren4324
      @stephenheffren4324 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      But then she wouldn't have been diagnosed with PTSD!
      Depp deserved his victory.

  • @channaborman6736
    @channaborman6736 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    The expert kept talking about using the test in a clinical setting. She was working this case in a FORENSIC setting. Ugh. So frustrating.

  • @twovillages7168
    @twovillages7168 2 ปีที่แล้ว +136

    I think its telling that, in general, Johnny's witnesses are usually easy to understand and follow, despite using complicated terms and processes. Amber Heard's witnesses on the other hand, seems to throw big words and processes around in a vague way that skirts around the issue in an effort to purposefully confuses those listening.

    • @aboutthat1440
      @aboutthat1440 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      A spot on comment.

    • @nicolebolick9663
      @nicolebolick9663 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Her witnesses and team come across as bad Disney villains!

    • @dll7658
      @dll7658 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      And also avoid discussing the specifics which will be damning to them. They try instead to create an illusion of the validity of their claims, or on the shade they throw at others when they are in fact unfounded

  • @YellowCanVlogs
    @YellowCanVlogs 2 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    "You said that we should read the manual, would you also agree with me that we need to read the directions?" I loved that one 🤣

    • @lesterschild1065
      @lesterschild1065 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      "Sure" she says 😂, man if I was or is a patient of that woman's I'd be questioning so many things 😂

  • @RichardHubbuck
    @RichardHubbuck 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I was a military police detective for 20 years (well, we weren't called detectives, but you get the point) and dealt with the recording of expert evidence for the purpose of production at court on many, many occasions. I'll say just this: the fact that this doctor *KNEW* that the material recorded during her consultations with AH would be produced for this trial is a travesty in terms of her trying to explain away the "88 pages of notes." Why? Because of one factor: the opposing counsel will simply bring up your slovenly attitude towards filling in official forms and reports. And wouldn't you know it - the psychologist was humiliated on two separate occasions for this exact reason. All it does is demonstrate a blasé attitude to the task at hand. She may well have 88 pages of notes, but it means sweet FA when the opposing counsel is berating you on the stand for not doing something as simple as filling in a box with a number. Some may question, 'why even have the box at all, then?!' As a specialist interviewer myself, I interviewed child and adult victims of rape, sexual assault and serious physical assaults; the fact that I recorded pages and pages of notes was a good thing - but they were my reference when compiling relevant reports. Yes, those notes were admitted as 'unused material' when the evidence bundles were forwarded to the prosecution, but the notes weren't the things being examined at court - the video recordings were, or the report was. For this psychologist to turn around and say, 'yes, but my 88 pages of notes blah, blah, blah' means absolutely nothing. What is being looked at/questioned? Yes, that's right - the report itself. So, to try and argue the toss that relevant points were scored for a diagnosis - where the notes are scribbled all over the form like a small child with a crayon, is shocking for an 'expert' charging $1000 per hour.
    Indeed, the time frames used in the examinations are relevant; you brought up the best example to prove this, when you discussed the origin of the PTSD and how the shrink fitted that into the alleged IPV complaint. It doesn't fit - it would never work. The best defence AH had, which would have worked, would have been to say, "I was violent towards Johnny because PTSD made me do it - the PTSD that was caused by my father abusing me as a child... ...ergo, it's not really my fault blah, blah, blah." Instead, AH, with the help of this shrink, purported that her mental suffering was caused as a result of the alleged IPV. Your subsequent point is correct - how does she know she suffers from PTSD from the alleged IPV involving Johnny, when she suffered at the hands of her father as a child?

  • @animeandgames6397
    @animeandgames6397 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Bruh, this lawyer was johnny depps gandalf. He sees through the bullshit.

  • @WadeWilson616
    @WadeWilson616 2 ปีที่แล้ว +219

    As a veteran with PTSD w/sever anxiety the way this lady operates makes me feel like she is attaching PTSD to things which would diminish how people view persons with PTSD.

    • @badomen9057
      @badomen9057 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Totally agree, it is great that recently mental health in general has been receiving more recognition however it is sickening
      To see how some people lie about it and use it for their own benefit.

    • @trinadagriff1140
      @trinadagriff1140 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I'm a veteran too and it's terrifying! Makes me wonder what her diagnosis iss and how many Dr's I've told all stuffed too what were their diagnosis?

    • @dll7658
      @dll7658 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Had a neighbor who was a veteran with PTSD before. And was diagnosed myself with bipolar. I feel like I know what you mean.

    • @wickedgenx1972
      @wickedgenx1972 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Not a vet but I have friends who are that have PTSD and I have PTSD from things in my past, this "doctor" pisses me off for all of us!
      She is absolutely one of those that twists what actual PTSD is.
      It is disgusting!

    • @lindaarrington9397
      @lindaarrington9397 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Agree
      I have it and it's ruff watching

  • @ThePrefessional
    @ThePrefessional 2 ปีที่แล้ว +112

    This is literally insane that she is an expert! A standardized test is exactly that. When I was in law enforcement if you deviated AT ALL from a standardized test it was thrown out. LIKE THAT'S NOT HOW IT WORKS. How is she on a board and considered an expert when she is literally not following directions on the simplest of things. I hope this woman gets removed from her status. A joke

    • @melt2947
      @melt2947 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      She is an expert liar

  • @gerriesmith5584
    @gerriesmith5584 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Look how red she turned when she was
    caught on lies. She is pissed 😤 😂

  • @hiropisku1078
    @hiropisku1078 2 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    The power of this man, this lawyer, is too great. The second you cross this man, your career is already dead.
    Never skip procedure folks. Don't expect to lie your way out. If you give a good lawyer an inch, they'll have you eating out of a soup can.

  • @LanaRedmond13
    @LanaRedmond13 2 ปีที่แล้ว +57

    He should have asked “You make $- an hour for your testimony and yet you can’t even manage to fill in all the paperwork?”

    • @daphnedevine
      @daphnedevine 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I think he said something close her 1st time on the stand 😉

    • @LanaRedmond13
      @LanaRedmond13 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@daphnedevine 👍

  • @CL_Hat
    @CL_Hat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +178

    She was literally yelling her testimony at the jury, I would be so done with this lady. She is answering and explaining all her line of questioning looking at the jury in a completely argumentative tone. Good luck with that.

    • @cindyrussell1581
      @cindyrussell1581 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      She took a page right out of turds book. They both want the jurors to believe them.

    • @marimar8175
      @marimar8175 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Omg I know! She looks so angry and almost yelling out her response. No respect or professionalism.

    • @laporziuncula
      @laporziuncula 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I’ve read at least three of the jurors were checked out when she went back up on the stand

  • @doctortimm3245
    @doctortimm3245 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Gotta love it - when she was up for the defense she said to read the manual, then she gets cross-examined and agrees that the tests should be administered with instructions, then goes on to basically say that the directions don't REALLY have to be followed just follow her notes - all 88 pages of them! No footnotes or anything, you just gotta read them all and find the relevant parts! I gotta try that next time I file my taxes; just fill out my name and include my w2 info and let the IRS figure it out!

  • @abbyvaughn3035
    @abbyvaughn3035 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Wayne Dennison: “ummmm You said that we should read the manual…Would you also agree with me that we should read the directions ?
    Bwahahahaha 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @youtubeismytimemachine5917
    @youtubeismytimemachine5917 2 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    Doctor Curry didn't seem at all confused. This doctor on the other hand seemed to manipulate testing in order to come up with a PTSD diagnosis.

  • @realtruth6406
    @realtruth6406 2 ปีที่แล้ว +742

    This woman is making a mockery of true domestic violence victims. She makes me sick!! is that US Justice system ? Law must above everything , everyone.. Shame

    • @zerg113
      @zerg113 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lmao you should see it in the uk. In uk they made johnny the abuser with 0 proof. US justice system is about to give amber a loss.

    • @djtoxicdhg
      @djtoxicdhg 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yea it's sad we get fucked hard in the us

    • @Artsificial
      @Artsificial 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Agreed.

    • @Insanity_Wolf
      @Insanity_Wolf 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      The US justice system is very corrupt. Especially so in domestic and civil cases. There are a handful of very amazing judges though. The bias towards women in the justice system is even worse in most cases than you see here. Most men can't even get a trial like this. They just have to live with the consequences of false accusations. On top of cases involving divorce, in only 3% of cases does the man walk out the benefactor (alimony, child custody, recipient of child support, acquiring of spouses assets.)

    • @carolross1517
      @carolross1517 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Agree 💯

  • @ninininininininicldn
    @ninininininininicldn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Her tests assume honesty from the patients, meanwhile Dr. Curry’s test accounts for dishonesty. End of story. This shouldn’t even be a discussion anymore. Ridiculous

  • @Superanima7
    @Superanima7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Good Point Asmon! She is contradicting her previous testimony to save her credibility in her profession with disrespect for the trial. Also yes she blended her overall assessment from Ms Turd’s childhood and her time with Mr Depp

  • @Subarashii_Nem
    @Subarashii_Nem 2 ปีที่แล้ว +634

    She's only there again because she's jealous of Dr. Curry and the respect she earned by being an actual psychologist with no bias, great at her job, people actually love her and she proved beyond reasonable doubt that this woman is incompetent at best and a straight up liar, fraud and law breaker at worst.
    Also Dr. Curry shut down the lawyers when they tried to spin her testimony into something it's not. She has the confidence and ability to stand her ground completely on her own merit and not sound like a spoiled child throwing a tantrum.

    • @OvelNick
      @OvelNick 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      No one else is saying it but.... It's psychology. Dr Curry is the more gorgeous, sexy ALONG with all of those things you listed as well. It's only human nature to know of someone that might be your academic and intellectual equal and when you see the physical differences are that starkly different you think, "well fuck... This is some bullshit." lol.

    • @tomdodson6293
      @tomdodson6293 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Yep, because she’s not a liar she’s just doing her job and being honest

    • @Teriteri22
      @Teriteri22 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@utmastuh yes! Same sex based Statement ruined it

    • @pale_saint
      @pale_saint 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@OvelNick this one is willing to lie and manipulate for Amber just because she’s a female too, not a good look

    • @alexbarn3841
      @alexbarn3841 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I don’t know about Curry being unbiased, but her methods were certainly more ethical and proper. Even if she is biased she used tests that don’t really even take the examiners bias into account. I think there’s always a clear bias when someone is being paid by one side to provide data, I think the only one that really wasn’t biased was Mr. Schnell he just gave them data, however that data turned out to be basically useless because he was given bad info and a bad task.

  • @katrinafrench6348
    @katrinafrench6348 2 ปีที่แล้ว +109

    This woman triggers me & you said it spot on. Get her off the stand! I'll say it again for the people in the back, you are the company you keep. Notice how Amber's whole team is rude & combative. While Johnny's team is nice & respectful!

  • @izzeypally
    @izzeypally ปีที่แล้ว +4

    "I'll say whatever will benefit the woman in court."
    - This Lady

  • @samanthaminter8764
    @samanthaminter8764 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Its aslo terrifying that Amber Heards attorneys, their law firm, has used this Dr. in 50 other cases (I believe that is what she stated the first time she was on the stand) as an expert.

  • @Victoria-nu9jb
    @Victoria-nu9jb 2 ปีที่แล้ว +99

    This Psychiatrist is an example of an employee who won Employee of the year ones, and then took that as validity for superiority.

    • @pale_saint
      @pale_saint 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      She won them only being the most visible and loud

    • @justonegreatday
      @justonegreatday 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      nah not even, she got a participation award and act like she got first place

    • @maxit933
      @maxit933 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      More like improvement award

  • @Undeathical
    @Undeathical 2 ปีที่แล้ว +164

    It is amazing how many people this case is offending. I am slighted as someone who has a ptsd diagnosis when I separated the military. I went through 4 different antidepressant medications, gained 100lbs from the meds and lack of interest in trying, constantly contemplating life and asking my subconscious why, distrusting everyone and losing all of my friends (still dont feel like I need friends, and still dont trust anyone except my wife and son), and I contact my parent/sister/family MAYBE once a year sometimes less. Thanks to trying different med combinations I have found a combo that allows me to function better than I have the last 4 year. I would not even be able to write this if I was without my care This doctor doesn't deserve her license imo, and needs to be extensively evaluated before being allowed to practice Psychology. Actual severe depression and PTSD is very much disabling.
    Edit: I also want to add that it took 3 years of weekly therapy sessions before my psychiatrist gave me a PTSD diagnosis . The diagnosis changed several times throughout the three years from depressive disorder, to major depression with anxiety then to PTSD. My doctor eliminated any other possibilities before giving it the PTSD diagnosis.

    • @KHONAMII
      @KHONAMII 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      💯 💯

    • @vickywitton1008
      @vickywitton1008 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      I hope your life keeps getting better, you deserve it mate!❤❤

    • @dawnpowell1988
      @dawnpowell1988 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I’ve been diagnosed with c-ptsd and I totally agree with the symptoms your talking about as Trauma I suffered was so severe I lost all hope in my heart and basically shut down and the repeated trauma thoughts over and over again for years which I had no control over it and it was completely debilitating to say the least . I haven’t been able to hold a regular full time job in years since experiencing this intense trauma .. which I used to socialize and be around social scenes and now I isolate cause I feel safe.. The trauma I experienced was due to 7 year smear campaign on me by my ex-husband along with him using our kids as pawns to cause harm to my life by projecting his abusive behaviors towards me and our kids onto me making me the abuser and it ruined my life as I was so severely paralyzed with anxiety and mental and emotional dealing with the betrayal of close friends and family and others in our town believing this smear campaign and not ever seeing anything with their own eyes so the smear campaign turned into disgusting gossip throughout the town and it was so hurtful and along with this I was in mental pain cause my ex lied about his actions to our children and he also made our kids lie about me to further the belief of his smearing .. so I suffered so much as my kids didn’t ever deserve this and it is not right . My ex was out to ruin my life for me leaving him due to mental emotional financial and sexual abuse .. a decade of my life was so painful . I believe Johnny was set up my Amber and she’s a liar clearly . Sickening these evil people ..

    • @bigham1997
      @bigham1997 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thank you for your service. I totally agree with you. I have many friends that do have PTSD and it is and can be debilitating it does take a while to find the correct medications that do help our military be able to enjoy some parts of life again. I’m very happy for you to have the people your trust around you

    • @stephaniefarley1236
      @stephaniefarley1236 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      First I want to say thank you and God Bless for your selfless service. I'm sorry that you have suffered ill affects. I'm glad you found something that helped you because I know firsthand some don't find that help and even worse I've known some who refused any help offered. I can't imagine what you went through so truly I am grateful for heroes like you. As for the lady who testified I agree she shouldn't have a licence and I feel whole heartedly that she should never be allowed to practice medicine again. From the way she spoke she's not helping anyone and I fear could hurt them. Same for the male psychiatrist but in my opinion he might be worse.

  • @sandracarson2509
    @sandracarson2509 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Pretty soon that smirk on Amber's face will be gone as she loses

  • @KINGTGB
    @KINGTGB 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    37:01 just love how she insults the juries intelligence right in front of them 🙄

  • @jennibee3842
    @jennibee3842 2 ปีที่แล้ว +86

    I am 53 years old and not a gamer. You have done such a fantastic job on this . I love listening to your analysis . I will miss this when it's over . I will have to check in and hear what you are up to though. Tomorrow- closing arguments! Then the jury gets it Tuesday.

    • @virtualasylum7013
      @virtualasylum7013 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      I agree...I only found his channel through this trial as I am not a gamer either. He has done a fantastic job...he is my go-to for this trial.

    • @jennibee3842
      @jennibee3842 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@virtualasylum7013 yeah mine too! I also like popcorned planet. But I like asmongolds attitude and how he listens to everything and make his commentary. He actually picks up on so many things and nuances that I totally miss. It's really something because I'm listening yet miss a lot. Hahaha he fills me in on way too much - I apparently suck at listening

  • @derek.....
    @derek..... 2 ปีที่แล้ว +226

    It’s ironic that Amber sat beside a box of Kleenex and never used one but Camille saw right through her tissue of lies and shredded her testimony like confetti 😂👍R.I.P RAY LIOTTA😮

    • @chipskyshart87
      @chipskyshart87 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Camille was fucking glorious today

    • @biglikemadonna
      @biglikemadonna 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      She only cries when spoken to by her lawyer..

    • @chrisw9122
      @chrisw9122 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      AH did grab a tissue...but only held it as she wiped her nose with her hand lol never touched her eyes.

    • @derek.....
      @derek..... 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@chrisw9122 hiding a quick snort of coke no doubt😂

    • @onipaa0074
      @onipaa0074 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      WAIT WHAT 😭 R.I.P

  • @justinjune
    @justinjune 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    32:37 The carelessness of this person makes me feel bad for the patients who came to her. It is sad.

  • @jack7195
    @jack7195 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    It still baffles me that these supposed "experts" came out and defended indefensible-material. Within their own fields no less! Their bias for Amber ruins their credibility and all for what, a couple of grand? Their careers must've really been tanking before all of this, otherwise it's just absurd. Also, think of their patients and/or their testimony to other cases. Doesn't bare thinking about.

  • @ivechang6720
    @ivechang6720 2 ปีที่แล้ว +112

    Also any proceedings that used her as "expert testimony" are now going to be closely scrutinized. What a gift JD and his lawyers have just given to at least fifty cases!

    • @thespanishinquisition4078
      @thespanishinquisition4078 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Fun fact: that's not really gonna happen...
      Because it's already happened. She's already been impeached on the last trial she took part in. And if you look at the reasons given by the court, it's literally 100% what she's done AGAIN.
      This dum ass already got fucked for pulling this crap and she's still not learning! She deserves to get disbarred by this point.

    • @lesterschild1065
      @lesterschild1065 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Or at least should be scrutinized hard.

    • @lauradavis8949
      @lauradavis8949 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      YEEAH! THIS HAS SHOWN WHAT BAD DRs LOOK LIKE

  • @Maiden_to_mother
    @Maiden_to_mother 2 ปีที่แล้ว +267

    She gave Amber a fucking check list lol I can’t believe she’s seriously up there again. These people are so fucking sickening

    • @booleah6357
      @booleah6357 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I can't wait for smeagols rebuttal if he even gets one. That dude didn't even know what the rule he was quoting was 🤣

    • @mariejenkins-stephens6176
      @mariejenkins-stephens6176 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      🤣🤣

    • @STP255
      @STP255 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you 🙏🏽 like someone needs to remind the jury how invalid are her methods of diagnosis lol

    • @ChickenKhorma
      @ChickenKhorma 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@booleah6357 Nah, they're out of time. I would pay good money for him to drop an angry reply vlog through a shitty laptop webcam on his own though, that would be amazing. He could use it as a springboard to start his own Flat Earth channel!

    • @booleah6357
      @booleah6357 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ChickenKhorma sad I would have loved to see a wizards durl

  • @tgawron2233
    @tgawron2233 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Dr Curry explained AH spot on. This women never filled out the any of the forms correctly.

  • @chris5947
    @chris5947 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    @24:10 Camille and Ben's glance at each other after the "reading the direction" comment lol

  • @artnull13
    @artnull13 2 ปีที่แล้ว +92

    So what we gathered was she came to her diagnosis before performing all the required assessments i.e. CONFIRMATION BIAS
    She failed to complete the required assessments properly
    She failed to use assessments properly as per the explicit instructions.
    How is this lady 1. Board certified 2. President of anything let alone trauma 3. Allowed to practice?

    • @randomperson-up5vt
      @randomperson-up5vt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Every box needs to checked, filled out, or noted not valid if for some reason that happens. If you have a large box to write out numerous things but don't because you have reports. Then state the reports are attached in another document or email, not leaving a box blank.

    • @TheZerosd
      @TheZerosd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Connections nothing else nothing more...

    • @artnull13
      @artnull13 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@randomperson-up5vt of course - a medical document is a legal document. She knows this.

    • @CrystallynRose
      @CrystallynRose 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@randomperson-up5vt The fact that she seems to expect the jury to pull the pertinent information from her 88 pages of notes is utterly ridiculous. Especially since they're likely not psychologists and wouldn't even know what to look for. The fact she didn't fill out the form properly tells me that either she's lazy, doesn't think the rules apply to her or she's purposefully hiding something. Or potentially all three. I hope the jury looks at it the same way.

  • @theyshouldhavenevergivenme5439
    @theyshouldhavenevergivenme5439 2 ปีที่แล้ว +79

    She comes off as extremely biased no matter who’s right about the technicalities of the testing.
    On top of that for a psychologist she’s just has an extremely unpleasant and comes off as overly authoritative.
    She also lacks the ‘stoicism’ one would associate with someone of this level. She was triggered the first time and now she comes off as super triggered.
    There is a reason for the universal dislike of this woman and it’s not because she’s testifying for AH.
    Imho this Is just a high functioning Karen

  • @raelsantana8179
    @raelsantana8179 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Wow, first when defending what she does, she tells that you need to just follow the manual: 6:34
    But when she need to fill up standard tests she doesn't, she writes her aswers in other pages away from the stardard... Her notes are more important than standards.

  • @InVertis29
    @InVertis29 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Looking back retrospecitively, all Mr Denison did was show that she was prone to cutting corners, using shortcuts and and not following instructions of the standard test.

  • @lauchilos123
    @lauchilos123 2 ปีที่แล้ว +212

    I can't believe they didn't ask her about how she expects the jury to go trough her 88 pages of notes when reviewing her documents consider to be from an expert in her field. Which many don't really understand. That would help the jury understand how unprofessional she is and how she is wasting their time on purpose to save herself some time on work she is paid an extreme fee.

    • @daphnedevine
      @daphnedevine 2 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      Don't forget the boxes she left blank because SHE knows what goes in them. Screw what the Jury needs! That's a PAID for professional my friend !

    • @simso1o
      @simso1o 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Yes ... I was surprised they didn't make more of that just to push the point home.

    • @VictorianEvening
      @VictorianEvening 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Dennison already went over that the first time he crossed her. He called her out on it then.

    • @JeanetteoftheLordJesusChrist
      @JeanetteoftheLordJesusChrist 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      She is sloppy...as sloppy as the other lawyers of AH.

    • @JeanetteoftheLordJesusChrist
      @JeanetteoftheLordJesusChrist 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They are dummies playing with people to fall into their trap of rethorics

  • @xtremefurrycat
    @xtremefurrycat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +217

    PTSD sucks, I don't like having something happen throwing me into a panic. This lady really needs to stop showing up in courtrooms she doesn't seem to know what she is talking about other than females are always the victims.

    • @daphnedevine
      @daphnedevine 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      It's all about the $$$$ my friend! Shameful isn't it?.

    • @Lemieux_7
      @Lemieux_7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Yes. She represents the bias that society has in general. Always believe the woman is no longer an appropriate slogan

    • @sherryjohnson3804
      @sherryjohnson3804 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I always thought that was ridiculous, guilty till proven innocent, I think of my dad, brothers and son, and how horrible it must be to be a man falsely accused

    • @rhm987
      @rhm987 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      I agree. I am a female with PTSD and am highly aggravated and offended by her lackadaisical/egotistical approach to diagnosing someone with the condition. It is just another condition or term that will trivialized via overuse.

    • @pale_saint
      @pale_saint 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes and that’s a lie because often times females are the abusers

  • @m3cMe
    @m3cMe 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Absolutely! She can’t say Johnny had anything to do with anything without having interviewed JD. It’s ludicrous!
    For all she knows AH was seeing someone else and THAT person WAS abusing, SHE’S GOT NO IDEA EITHER WAY! And then to be angry about it?
    A total lack of respect for the court and attorneys and AH? The ppl she hires for attorneys etc? They’re just as screwed up as her! They’re all “blamers”! Speaks volumes for confirming AH is such a horrible person and her choice of Dr and attorneys? They lie and can’t even be professional! Huh, who does that remind me of?

  • @Boro87
    @Boro87 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    seeing AH smirk during the trial made me so angry back in may, but it fills me with joy today :D

  • @WindingDreams
    @WindingDreams 2 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    Wizard Destroyer: You shouldnt use this as a diagnostic tool.
    Board Certified Witch: Correct, I used a lot of other tests.
    WD: You used the tests wrong.
    My man is just flinging counterspells like crazy..

  • @andersonbarnett4245
    @andersonbarnett4245 2 ปีที่แล้ว +255

    I wish that they could bring in a neutral expert in psychiatric testing. One problem with abusive & manipulative people is that they manipulate both the professionals conducting the tests as well as the tests themselves. Occasionally they lie to themselves as well. My ex was evaluated on 4 occasions within 12 months by 3 psychologists and each time he had a completely different personality. One psychologist concluded that he was the victim not the abuser, even though he was being given free anger management help by the DV shelter. Another concluded that he wasn't intelligent enough to lie or deceive psychologists. Yet another concluded that he wasn't aware, had amnesia etc.
    Finally they said we can't help him because we can't find out which personality is the true person and which is fabricated. Different tests results even completely opposing results do not prove one expert to by incompetent. It proves that the subject being tested is smart enough to understanding the purpose of each question then give answers that we lead to the outcome they choose. I'm not saying that's she educated, just a practiced manipulator.

    • @McPeror
      @McPeror 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Neutral experts provided by court make too much sense and don't benefit the rich that can hire experts to lie for them.

    • @andersonbarnett4245
      @andersonbarnett4245 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@McPeror true enough
      Even if they'd had a 3rd party administer one test and sent individual copies to each side's psych expert for interpretation, it just would eliminate so much ambiguity and wasted time. As you say though, that kind of clarity doesn't benefit the wealthy.

    • @afelias
      @afelias 2 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      Dr. Curry's testimony prior showed that the test methodology accounts for this. There are deliberate questions placed there that would assume that your PTSD is so extreme that it's unbelievable. If you answer positively to too many of those questions, you're likely not to have PTSD, but are feigning or exaggerating. (Which doesn't mean you're necessarily a liar - it can mean that you don't have a grasp of reality which is a completely different problem, or that you were kinda psyche-ing yourself out on something and exaggerating.) That's also why further interviews (which are also in that manual) are recommended. Dr. Curry said she would have done further testing, herself, but Amber was uncooperative and she had a time limit.
      Amber Heard tripped all the false positives. The test clearly shows she's feigning/exaggerating. It's her expert, Dr. Hughes, who is misrepresenting the test results.

    • @Laeuskong
      @Laeuskong 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      We had a similar situation in our family, you see, my lil sis was kind of highly hormonal growing up, lying and manipulating while being a complete monster who couldn't take a "no".
      My parents paid for years for a psychologist that ended up "befriended" my sister and took everything my sis was saying about us as truth and wouldn't push her or doubt her, she even started saying WE were the real problem and that my sis was totally normal and okay.
      Lets just resume and say that this psychologist is not working anymore. LOL. just sucks she sucked thousands of dollars out of my family for nothing.

    • @andersonbarnett4245
      @andersonbarnett4245 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@Laeuskong
      That's horrible. Is your sister on good terms with the family now?

  • @RichardHubbuck
    @RichardHubbuck 2 ปีที่แล้ว +67

    She’s actually contradicted her own testimony - AND she has back-tracked in this testimony. The jury (if they’re worth their salt) are either confused or have realised that she has contradicted herself. Maybe that’s what the defence team wants. However, compare this testimony with what Amber bleated out in her final testimony and it is plain to see that this shrink and Amber’s bollocks don’t add up anyway.
    PS, she DID use checklists as tests in her original testimony - I know, having undergone the tests and checklists for PTSD myself.

    • @dustinrausch5008
      @dustinrausch5008 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      A lawtuber called Emily D. Baker has been streaming the trial, and after the testimonies on this day, spoke with Runkle of the Bailey, who was actually in the courtroom watching the jury (guy in the blue suit with long white hair; at the start of the video, you can see him if you look past Elaine's shoulder).
      Apparently, the jury didn't seem very convinced by Hughes or by Amber's sob story.

  • @lisap8547
    @lisap8547 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Asmongold I recently subscribed bc of your commentary to the Depp trial. I love that you call one of the lawyers “the wizard destroyer” awesome 👏🏻😎

  • @kizzgizz
    @kizzgizz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +77

    This case has become a pissing contest between experts lol

    • @jordyjohn2275
      @jordyjohn2275 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      More like a pros vs. Joes humiliation

    • @sorryimsosad
      @sorryimsosad 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      If you consider Ms. Turds clients as “experts”. I see it more like Amber Heards Herd of Karens

  • @Tommy9834
    @Tommy9834 2 ปีที่แล้ว +63

    I think she IS a legitimate expert on PTSD, because I'm sure she got PTSD from the last time she was on the stand.

  • @petertyper1
    @petertyper1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This lawyer is seriously awesome!! He’s just too damn good!

  • @koppsr
    @koppsr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The moment the "expert destroyer" from team Depp saw the lineup for team Heard, he was like :" Aah....fresh meat!"

  • @screamingbennett882
    @screamingbennett882 2 ปีที่แล้ว +103

    As someone with PTSD, I see the shell shock that results soon after traumatic events from it in Johnny. It is very obvious that he is stressed to be there, but he needs lawful validation that tells him he's not imagining the entire ordeal. Amber may have PTSD, but I personally don't see any signs of recent trauma in her behavior.

    • @afelias
      @afelias 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      I came from the Nick Rekieta stream, someone there said "I am an actual war veteran and I've been diagnosed with PTSD, and even I didn't score as high as Amber did."
      Dr. Curry showed that Amber scored so high on the PTSD tests that it was suspicious, and she tripped all the "false positive" questions that were so ludicrous that they were designed to detect people faking PTSD. That's what Dr. Hughes is hiding, is that Dr. Curry caught her either lying about Amber's results or being so stupid that she didn't see the pattern first, despite being her psych for like half a decade.

    • @jeanhartely
      @jeanhartely 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Interesting. According to Dr. Curry's testimony, Johnny Depp seems to be showing more signs of PTSD than Amber Heard.

  • @Maciekzw
    @Maciekzw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +146

    Dennison is going to be forever haunting the memories of those who tried to stand up to him. The Anti Wizard stands eternal.

    • @rulzzzzzz
      @rulzzzzzz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @𝓈𝒽𝒾𝓋𝓋𝓎 Wayne F Dennison

    • @albertko1
      @albertko1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      The "OK" counterspell 🤣

    • @baoz2998
      @baoz2998 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Batman

    • @MoonBeamLight
      @MoonBeamLight 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Him and Camille.

  • @Mike_79
    @Mike_79 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It's like my wife, she went to a doctor (2018) for a bump that did a lot of pain. He said It's your teeth that is te reason for that bump. ( Our Doctor's wife was dentist..)She would pull out last 4 teeth..
    But my wife had a gut feeling that this was not the reason. My wife went to hospital by her own to make pictures of it.
    After the pictures she had CANCER spread to her neck on 12 places ( 2 days later, she had an 8 hour operation) . So IF she did wat the dentist said or Dr, my wife was dead now.
    For now everything is fine, 1/4 of her tongue is gone. Sometimes gut feeling is better then a doctor. 35 year and 2 kids then, 20 year married this year. Agnostic but, THANK GOD.

  • @TheRealVenna
    @TheRealVenna 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    As someone diagnosed with C-PTSD and went through years of therapy for it, the scale assessments were what I was asked to fill out before each visit, because it provided my therapist with kind of a mood thermometer for the period of time between my visits. It was NOT used as a diagnostic tool, just as an on going mood measurement that allowed her to track my progress over time.

  • @TheBongReyes
    @TheBongReyes 2 ปีที่แล้ว +109

    I really have to blame Asmon for me being curious about this case. Never heard of it until he started reacting to it. Now, I find myself being a Johnny Depp fan.

    • @charlesrayiii
      @charlesrayiii 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Objection narrative

    • @kuzmavolkov
      @kuzmavolkov 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Objection speculation.

    • @mrifqi9635
      @mrifqi9635 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      objection hearsay

    • @daphnedevine
      @daphnedevine 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Objection - AGREED@

    • @varethedemon
      @varethedemon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Objection - Can I approach?

  • @drsylvietourigny5428
    @drsylvietourigny5428 2 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    There's a reason certain tests are called "standardised": they are meant to be administered in the same, STANDARD way, each time they are administered, whether among DV victims or burglars or aged care residents. Some of these administrations may well be accompanied by notes bearing a number linking them to the test: the notes do NOT substitute for the standardisation of the test, they supplement it.
    As to PTSD and level of functioning, one needs to factor in what was "normal" prior to the event: a high functioning individual before the trigger occurence/s, whose PTSD causes 15% loss of function, is still above the average after the trigger. They are unlikely to become babbling idiots.

    • @tchew2545
      @tchew2545 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      That’s what i was saying… u can refer to the notes in the testing but u can’t simply omit the notes… even IF she did not do this to alter the results, it can invalidate and it’s just poor practice in general

  • @eviejean8
    @eviejean8 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    She used a lot of checklists and then told the court she completed 12 formal assessments. She admits that she did the same battery of assessments with Amber that she would use with clients in a therapeutic setting where she suspects or knows they have been affected by DV, so the assessments she did assume the client has probably been a victim of DV. That is not appropriate for a court setting where your client has a huge monetary incentive to feign results.

  • @PaigeIrene15
    @PaigeIrene15 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I’m glad someone else is as angry as I am about her testimony. She makes real victims look bad