ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ต.ค. 2024
- The remote town of Lochmaddy, Scotland, is currently home to an extremely simple, and surprisingly effective, art installation about climate change.
Subscribe to VICE News here: bit.ly/Subscrib...
Check out VICE News for more: vicenews.com
Follow VICE News here:
Facebook: / vicenews
Twitter: / vicenews
Tumblr: / vicenews
Instagram: / vicenews
More videos from the VICE network: www. vic...
![[UNCUT] "บอสณวัฒน์" แฉ! แหล่งซุกเงินแก๊งบอส ขยันผิดที่ไม่กี่ปีก็เข้าคุก l คนดังนั่งเคลียร์ l17ต.ค.67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/BL56qIfXYZM/mqdefault.jpg)
Reporter: “How do the lights work?”
Man: “HOW YOUNG ARE YOU?”
If the lines together became a single long line when watched from an angle, it'd become even more awesome
They should try to have them installed in New York
They do have them installed in all the strip clubs!! They look awesome!!
Keeps on thinking of those bike tracks from Tron.
*Miniature Tron Cycles*
not just art, more design and activism.
i like it. i don't want to see in in the Netherlands though. that will be creepy AF. with 50% of the country below sea level already...
True, but I think it needs to be there so people can be more prepared and proactive in shaping their futures around our planets ever changing climate.
john pardon I think a lot of this is pointless, all it does is scare the crap out of people who can’t really do anything about it. The people who can actually change this won’t care.
@@Colddirector they can make choices that will affect it, such as choosing products that are more responsible, and vote for people who are going to confront climate change.
@@jenisedai As someone who does that already, a lot of products are still far more wasteful than they need to be, the frequency of the plastic I need to discard even when trying to cut down makes me cringe.
And voting isn't really effective enough, you have to have enough people actively campaigning for pro-climate candidates and able to combat the endless lies to sway more of each country that needs to change (ie basically all major countries). A lot of this seems to be being the right person in the right place and having the time to do the campaigning, which not a lot may necessarily have.
@@Colddirector I agree with you on both points, but I don't think we can just give up because we aren't that magical 'right time, right place' person. Incremental change is still change.
Yeah coastal towns are fucked. They don’t have the funds to fight sea level rise. Big cities might still last. The Netherlands are gonna thrive though. Their war vs the ocean will be entering a brand new phase.
"Nobody's doing anything about it..." This is true in his art community. Never mind the lighting engineers who are developing LED lighting that is 100's times as efficient. Never mind the glass engineers who are developing triple glazing and strategic low e coatings for #2 and #3 glass surfaces of IGU's. Never mind the breakthrough's in framing, and insulation. We need housing but give no credit to innovators and contractors who build in land use and energy use efficiency. We are lowering the rates of Carbon output, but still constructing homes with lighting, plumbing, heat and available transportation. AOC tells us "housing is a right" then Mayor De Blasio tries to ban the land-use efficient high rise. Why not have a real debate instead of spouting out endless grievances.
Yes just as tired of this argument "nothing is being done" as I am the people straight out denying it.
It’s storm surge line.
Annndd another reupload from months ago
So, if we stop emitting CO2 completely the oceans will still rise... so... how is this saving the planet?
It's not just about rising water levels it leads to more extreme weather (droughts,hurricanes, fires etc) limiting co2 levels can help to make the permanent damage more limited
@@danielw.2554 And what extreme weather are we having that didn't happen in pre-CO2 emitting days? In order to state this you must prove the bad storms are unappreciated...and they just aren't. 50's had the worst hurricanes. Tornadoes are less frequent. Damage is WAY down from peaks a hundred years ago.
@@JoellHaugan www.climate.gov/news-features/blogs/beyond-data/2018s-billion-dollar-disasters-context
@@JoellHaugan go talk to yourself in the corner
@J P it's about severity and frequency and that was a government website if you dont even trust that then go put on your tin foil hat and keep listening to the oil lobbyists bc theres no way they could be biased
Try showing them the Gorbals. Sardines in a stinking, damp drug infested prison.
Brilliant
We can use all the extra water to put out the forest fires... dosnt seem that bad.
and it will leech into groundwater and make it non-potable. Hoo-fucking-ray
J P he means the salt water, putting out forest fires with sea water is the ridiculous.
RE-RUN...
I don't care if its good or bad art, it's atleast beautiful and that's what matters.
That's pretty devastating. Almost as devastating as your company's value in 2019 vs 2010 LOL
Meanwhile in China :........ "KEEP WORKING ON THAT DAMN REPLICA" !!! And more factories !!!
the timing of the glacials and interglacials was driven by periodic changes in Earth’s orbit that change the amount of sunshine reaching various parts of the planet. The effect of these small orbital changes was amplified by positive feedbacks, such as changes in greenhouse gas levels.
During the first two-thirds of the Quaternary, the ice advanced and retreated roughly every 41,000 years - the same tempo as the changes in the tilt of Earth’s axis. lol
Is bullshit what you learn in American schools? As the rainforests go, and more shit is pumped in to the atmosphere, you think that’s the same as the natural cycles of the Earth? 7 billion people make a huge difference.
Ionospheric heating
Timeline?
7-10 inches of sea level rise every 100 years.
So I would guess about 800 years from now if it keeps rising.
@J P Example please.
@J P The sea has been rising for over 14,000 years. The beach areas have changed over time.
The Earth is not static.
@J P Vice had some one in a in a episode say 100 ft sea level rise in the next 80 years. This was in the last 2 years.
I hate fear mongering with lies.
Vice news being vice news again. Piss poor journalism at its finest!
virtue signalling masterbation.
I'm going to do the same art installation in Florida but base it off of the predictions of 1990.
There will be a big sign saying "this will be underwater by 2005 along with most of Florida"
@@phillylove7290 please cite your source. I see dipshits saying this kind of crap all the time, but none of you can ever say where it comes from.
Edit: I saw your post linking the fucking American Enterprise Institute. You're a moron. Not only do most of the "wrong" predictions somehow not have any dates attached (because the author assumes idiots like you will just assume they were supposed to have happened by now), but a large number of them came from Paul Ehrlich -- a biologist talking primarily about overpopulation and the then-current rates of chemical usage and consumption, not climate change. But you either didn't read any of that or ignored it because you were just looking for whatever stupid bullshit you think supports you. Meanwhile, all the actual science in the fucking world says you're wrong and dumb.
its gonna be deeper then that
I'm going to do the same art installation in Florida but base it off of the predictions of 1990.
There will be a big sign saying "this will be underwater by 2005 along with most of Florida"
Predictions are not real and were never meant to be.
I want lights around my everything
Is Vice News Tonight coming back to HBO?
sell your house buy a boat
And let the cocaine jokes go
Need a few billion people to take note, sadly this is a tear in an ocean
REPOST!
Lol the tides lower the boats daily. The lines are a prediction are such bs. Why can you get so many “predictions” so wrong like the melting of the ice caps which didn’t happen. This is like an end of times religion you dare not question.
Gee really bad
I think they should have the lights everywhere. Then people might start to pay attention to how climate change is affecting the whole world. It will kept it in everyone's mind. Then people might start changing there habits? Let's all have hope.
Chris from Missouri
How to test a belief? Art no taxation no dire warning no. GAMBLING I would pay 10 to 1 odds 12 years no big deal .01 inch per year or 1 inch in 100 years for those math challenged. Probability of me winning 99.99 collecting bet .000009999
CHA Gabd Idir Tapadh Leat fer the share!
An art students representation of a disputed possible outcome of the environment.. im sure this will change the world view
Whoa, this is actually very funny.
Hoax
200 years from now? Or maybe the next Ice Age will shrink the oceans before.
Scientists are saying at this point we might not have another ice age
@@danielw.2554 AND other scientists are saying that this current significant Grand Solar Minimum may be the start of a mini-ice age (better be hoarding food if so).
@J P Dr. Phipps if you really need a name (there are many scientists who agree) but an ice age should be happening right about now (at least the start) but it's not because of the increased temperature. Meaning naturally it should be getting colder, but people have made it warmer. pretty simple stuff really
Just a few facts....the climate hasnt changed in Scotland and the sea level rate of change hasnt increased either, so apart from keeping the lights on at night, just what is the purpose of this artwork again?
[citation needed]
Wow wow wow 🌊💧💦
Hilarious.
Dire Predictions
Which are Science Fiction. How much has the sea level risen in the last 50-100 years with the rise in fossil fuel CO2?
About 15cm on average.
@@JohnHazenhousen So thousands of years to reach that line. That's if the trend stays constant which it won't because of natural cycles - nothing to do with fossil fuel CO2.
The global warming that we are seeing is not natural, it is a result of human emissions since the industrial revolution. It IS CO2. We KNOW this.
@@JohnHazenhousen Fiction that has been pushed and indoctrinated in school kids since Al Gore. No scientist would get before the U.N. and state evidence. They had to march out the indoctrinated child Greta. No scientist was at court to support Michael Mann when he could not show justification for his hockey stick.
So with which aspects of the underlying science do you disagree?
Do you at least accept the validity of the greenhouse effect?
Global warmimg is now over as The UK just had its coldest October in 400 years because the earth is entering a grand solar minimum 2020- 2042 - hits every 400 years and cools the planet by avg 1C
Guys he's done it, climate change is officially OVER. This weather has been a bit chilly this month therefore it is over.
Global warming is about climate trends. A warm or cold day, week or month is just weather.
that is so stupid it hurts
@J P Going trough active cycles every 11 years is quite the opposite of "unpredictable".
@J P God are you pedantic. A cycle per definition is a repeating sequence, therefore predictable. And no the sun is most certainly *not* unpredictable. Thats why the impact of solar cycles can be predicted years in advance.
Artic used to have lots of plants. Found wooly mammoths here. Had to have something to eat. Wheres that fact. A million years ago this place was green. Important part of story. History repeating self.
With millions of refugee if it happens, and here I though human superiority was a right-wing idea...... what happened when it comes to climate control? Now you let nature take it course?
@@mastersonogashira1796 Name me one thing that's more efficient since the govt got involved in energy saving. I drive a 1981 volkswagen pickup that gets 55 mpg. Still nothing on market that beats. Everyone want to drive a mobile apartment with 500hp in case they need to go 150 mph to go get a pop. Change this, fuel economy instead of Horsepower would be a start.
Not even 1 million years ago, just a few thousand Africa was completely green.
@Stanley Goddard repeated over and over, when happened in past how do you explain. What do you know about Fukushima Japan. Triple nuclear meltdown, almost 9 years, no fix in site. Don't you think should worry about this first? Everyone silent, because nuclear will save planet,as long as no one knows about Fukushima.
@randykerr electric car
Bull
you might put them somewhere where they they can have a bit more impact eh? preaching to the converted no?
Wait till the weather changes next year..the world ocean level is the lowest in over 100 years....FAKE NEWS
Ok boomer
In Salton city California we have the reverse effect of this where there is a line naturally marked along the mountain where the waterline USED to be. What people do not realize is that climate change is a natural Earth phenomenon that has been going on since before humans were around. For God's sake, we had Pangea. Humans did not cuase The complete geological shift that created the world we know today. Our world is changing every day and it will continue to change no matter what we try and do to stop it. You cannot fight mother nature, it will end up horribly wrong if you try. Search HARRP. They may be to blame for some extreme weather phenomena.
Stanley Goddard It is concentrated and mainly coming out of South East Asia and China. We have standards in the United States and do our duty on making sure that we are not destroying ourselves. Most countries do not even require a smog. We are the last country that needs propaganda and lecturing take it somewhere else where people actually need awareness and a change of government.
Of course the earth has always changed, but we can't use that to deny the fact that we pump toxic gasses into our atmosphere. You can't just say that all these changes are caused naturally and we have no effect because we haven't been here on earth long enough to see what we've done.
They also dump trash in to the ocean. Send Greta thunberg-ers overthere we don’t need he divisive lying-ass here
Micah Bell have you ever heard of HARRP?
And yes humans have been on earth for long enough to know that extreme weather conditions and changes and geology occur. There have been mass extinctions before fossil fuel’s. We have extremely high standards for gas and fuel in the United States of America. All this rhetoric should be directed at China and the rest of Asia especially the countries on the Pacific coast and Indian oceans. The reason I know Greta Thunberg is a propagandist is because she is pandering to a well crowd in the United States where in if she actually really cared, she would be touring Asia.
Stanley Goddard you are lying and that is not true we ranked number 11 out of 192 countries. You obviously have not ever been to Mexico. Which is the nearest example of just how different our standards are compared to other countries. Use actual government statistics please, not Memes and MSNBC propaganda.
THIS TIME YES FOLKS!! AFTER BEING MISTAKEN FOR DECADES SEA IS FINALLY RISING!
Just love these hypothetical opinions creating scare tactics must be an all time endeavor for the liberal brainwashed...
facts dont care about your feelings, as ben shapiro says Robert
I just love you flat-Earthers trying to claim that what is clearly observable to anyone is not real, because you somehow know more than a millennia of science, when you didn't even graduate grade-school.
The unfortunate thing is none of it is opinion
@J P It's funny how you want me to show proof without computer models, yet you are then trying to claim the validity of climate models that you have, GENERATED ON A COMPUTER. Way to go, you win the hypocrisy award. Oh the irony.
@J P It's so telling how you continually use projection in a weak attempt to discredit me, but while you can't even acknowledge, much less refute, any of the facts. It's been your bleating that I've been responding to, the only crying I'm doing is laughing at you making such a fool of yourself. Then, in your laughable claim of my alleged hypocrisy, you pretend that I was "crying over insults earlier" as if to invalidate the fact that your argument was only insults (when I merely pointed them out), and then you try to insult me again, thus proving my observation correct.
I can't wait for you to prove all the world's climate scientists wrong, all of the meteorologists, all of the pilots, all of the nautical navigators, all of the FAA, all of NOAA, and all of NASA wrong with your revolutionary "evidence", which you don't seem to have yet.
Maybe if you ever left your mom's basement, you would know a little bit more about the world around you, Cadet Dunning-Kruger. Enjoy the life you make for yourself as a science-denier, but I doubt it is a pleasant one, having to thi9nk that everyone is out to get you in some elaborate secret conspiracy that you saw on TH-cam and decided to believe without any critical-thinking involved. I would pity you, but you do it to yourself.
That’s not art. I guess me putting my Christmas lights up makes me an artist. The lights may symbolize something but it’s not art.
next time i see a thirteen foot straight line with white LEDs in a home depo i'll think about what you said lol
Art is subjective like humour this has meaning and it has an effect I like it it had a message if you don't like it then you don't like it quite simple
@@Columbakin you'd think they would choose some artistic idea that didn't waste energy to make this point though. maybe they are just bored electricians.
@@mrtrashcompaktor1540 Do you think LED strips consume a lot? Come on. It's all about awareness. You and I, we're not even Scotland, yet you got word about that small installation
@@tarcal87 it kind of dilutes the whole point though....nul points
Science has been predicting "Meaning Nothing"
*I love all the flat-Earthers trying to troll this channel, claiming or implying that this is some kind of hoax, as if they know more than the entire world's climate scientists, when they didn't even graduate grade school. This shows how desperate they are to live in their Orwellian fantasy world, they will say anything that they can to make it happen.*
@J P If climate change isn't real, then PROVE it...but you CAN'T, all you have are your unsupported talking-points. Tell me this: What would be the benefit of lying about it? What is the motivation to lie about it amongst the world's ACCREDITED climate scientists? How does one become world--reknowned in the field by simply claiming that they are one? I want to know how this mythical process works for you in your mind.
@J P The vidence that you have nothing to stand on is that you are trying to discredit me, but YOU CANNOT REFUTE THE SCIENCE. FACT.
@J P Well since you are too illiterate to read my post, nor answer any questions about the BS you are postulating. You keep contradicting yourself, and going back top your weak argument of anthropogenic model (Which is not observed fact, it is a MODEL, which you JUST claimed could not be valid). You further it with the "it's snowing, so where's global warming?" trope of the willfully-ignorant, yet you STILL have nothing to substantiate your claim that humans have nothing to do with climate change. You refuse to face ANY fact I provide you, all you can do is fall back on your talking-point and misuse words like "dissonance" when you don't know what they mean. You have proven nothing but MY points, and I can't bear to watch the tragedy that you have made of your argument.
You are of course always right, you of course know so much more than any scientist ever did, clearly the world should bow to your vastly superhuman intellect that is too good for any form of education. You are better than anyone else because you possess a greater knowledge of the entire world than any education could provide. You're totally right that a mass the size of Earth can spontaneously change it's velocity, and migratory patterns ingrained over millions of years based on climate just suddenly and arbitrarily change without a common stress factor.
All the science and study I have done is entirely wrong. The scientific shills are just keeping you down in a grand conspiracy to hide the observable truth. I'm simply not good enough to be a part of your exalted religion. I'll be sure to refund my NASA-shill paycheck and I'll preach your anti-science religion to everyone now. Thanks for clearing that all up for me.
@J P Again,*the burden of proof is incumbent upon the one who dissents with popular belief. I don't have to prove anything to you. YOU are challenging centuries-established convention, so YOU need to prove YOUR case against it. You wonder why I call you a flat-Earther? Because you make the same arguments in the same manner, and project your failures onto those you challenge instead of challenging the science. You keep trying to defend your belief instead of seeking any fact to support the unsubstantiated conclusion that you came to, which is the exact opposite of the scientific method.
You can keep digging and digging, but you will never find where you lowered the bar of your argument to. The best part is when you are older, you will see for yourself the effect of what you once denied for yourself, but by then it will be too late for you to do anything about it. You will have to answer to your children as to why you perpetuated a political talking point over proven and established science, when children right now can already debunk your mythology entirely..
@J P Oh, and by the way, since you didn't actually READ the report and only looked at headlines, let me give you an excerpt of what you missed:
Some of the key takeaways from the report included:
•The observed warming of Canadian temperatures are due to "human influence."
•There has been more rain than snowfall in Canada since 1948, a trend that looks to continue over the 21st century.
•Temperature extremes have changed in Canada, meaning extreme warm temperatures are getting hotter and extreme cold is becoming less cold.
•Extreme hot temperatures will become more frequent and intense.
•Over the last 30 years, the amount of snow-covered land has decreased in Canada.
•Flooding is expected to increase in Canada because of sea-level rise.
•Freshwater shortages in the summer are expected because warmer summers will increase the evaporation of surface water
Oh whups, just like a flat-Earther, you cite a report that debunks your own claim that climate change is NOT man-made. There, I proved you wrong, WITH FACTS. Here's another link that you won't read:
www.cnn.com/2019/04/01/health/canada-global-warming/index.html
*I accept your surrender, flattard.*
Scare tactics, only extreme predictions, phew.
Fake news
Fake brain
Jesus saw that that’s so devastating. Maybei need to be reprogrammed?
Fake news its just the tide! He said it himself