GT vs RCB and CSK vs SRH Pre-Match Analysis | Saturday Double-header Matches
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 เม.ย. 2024
- Sign up on Flipster and complete KYC using our referral link to get a $10 reward : tinyurl.com/flipster1st
Get set for another scintillating Sunday in the IPL as the excitement reaches a fever pitch with a thrilling double-header. In the next episode of the @firstumpire Live Podcast Series, we're all geared up to dissect the intense clashes between GT and RCB, followed by CSK locking horns with SRH.
Join us for an exhilarating pre-match analysis session where we'll unravel the strategic intricacies, pivotal players, and potential game-changing moments that are poised to define these crucial encounters. Our expert panel will delve deep into the tactical blueprints of each team, dissecting their strengths, weaknesses, and the strategies they're likely to deploy on the field.
Listeners can expect a comprehensive breakdown of the matchups, complete with discussions on standout performances, key head-to-head battles, and the potential turning points that could shape the outcome of these fiercely contested games. From explosive batting displays to clinical bowling spells, we'll leave no stone unturned in our quest to unravel the essence of these clashes.
Moreover, our analysis will shed light on the broader implications of these matches, examining how victories or defeats could impact the standings and momentum of the participating teams as the IPL season unfolds. Whether you're a die-hard fan of GT, RCB, CSK, SRH, or simply a cricket enthusiast craving for expert insights, this live podcast promises to be a riveting journey through the heart of IPL action.
Tune in to @firstumpire for a pre-match analysis like never before, where passion meets precision, and excitement meets expertise. Don't miss out on the opportunity to enhance your cricketing knowledge and join the conversation as we gear up for a Sunday double-header spectacle that's bound to keep you on the edge of your seats. - กีฬา
All in all..
I'll suggest to be as critical as possible with whatever we share because we tend to learn a lot from your questions and also from your amazing points..
Be as contradictory as possible as this is a community afterall and we all should feel free to share our opinions..
I must admit, reading these comments make me learn so so much as you all always add multiple new perspectives.. ❤😊🙏
I would also like you to discuss the fact that it took one-day cricket such a long time to evolve, 225 was considered a good score once. The first 400 score came after ages and once batsman broke that barrier and when they had no other option but go from ball one. it was chased in the same game. I feel T20 is going through the same phase now (players are becoming more fearless) some might argue it's all in favour of batsman but I would say batsman are being more fearless, I predict bowlers next season would level up and change their game. If you notice when a batsman start hitting the bowlers they become more defensive and start bowling off line deliveries and are becoming predictable. Do you think bowlers now need to change their game a little and think of different ways to make a difference? Is it the principle of causation? Cause and effect.
I must admit that these pointers regarding
1. Shorter grounds n easier wickets
2. Pant having already played 66 T20Is
3. Sanju finishing games n staying not out on tougher wickets
4. Sanju not been given longer run for all these years
These points surely give Sanju a slight edge against Pant..
I think I ignored few of the above pointers while evaluating this as for me I've a strong bais against those players who have won big matches against Aus..
India has beaten Aus 3 times in knockouts..
2000 champions trophy
2007 World t20
2011 ODI Workshop
2 times we won the trophy n 1 time we lost closely in the finals to NZ in 2000 due to a gem by Chris Cairns
I still believe that VVS Laxman in 2003 ODI World Cup could've done something bigger against Aus as he had a wood over them..
Sole reason I have given a little edge to Pant as he has got under the skin of Aussies in big matches.. yes I agree the format is not t20..
The same reason why legends like Ponting, Langer, etc. rate Pant so so high.. Even Yuvi does..
One more point especially T20's is a lot about mindset and how confident you feel. Whenever Pant played for India in T20's International he has mostly been sure of his position while playing. He knew he would play the whole series this eases you up and gets you to perform better. Sanju has never been given 5 continues match in last 10 years. He knows whenever he plays T20I it might be his last chance that does a lot of harm to him. See in IPL since RR backed him up and made captain how better he is becoming with time. Sachin took some good 80+ innings to score his first 100 and the rest is history. I have nothing against Pant he is immensely talented and has done amazing but T20's Sanju deserve to be there, If not now when. Just because he is not a good PR material or good on Insta. You can't ignore a guy for so long. I agree with your point he did well against Aussies in test but see how different Tests and T20 are, when pant came onto scene, he was purely seen as a T20 batsman but he broke through in Tests which was a surprise. Sanju has never been given to opportunity to prove himself with backing. I also feel, if given chance in tests Sanju has the talent and skills to master that format tooo. But for now I would say he deserves to be in the first playing Xi of india ahead of pant. Pant could be a backup in case he fails.
really appreciate ur responses and I think a great quality to change ur views based on the discussions..that the whole point of having healthy discussions ❤❤I became a huge fan you..
Thanks a ton ❤😊
Honestly speaking only reason why I started this channel is my son's love for the game..
I never forced him to even watch it once.. just happened naturally to him
Now I want to be very active with the game so that I can help him achieve his dream of becoming something in this field..
With Almighty's grace, I was able to make a hugely profitable exit last year due to which now I have the time to focus more on my kids' dreams ❤😊🙏
With more such discussions, I learn a lot more so really excited about these all the time ❤😊
@@2605deepak Wish him all the very best for the future. I hope he achieve wonders and I am there fighting with others for his inclusion in the team. And not just me millions other like me.
I have a question for u guys ..some of the wickets like banglore ,delhi,kolkatha are super batting friendly with 55 meter boundaries.but Gujarat,rajasthan and LSG wickets are not that flat and has bigger boundaries..there is an unfair advantage for the batters like kohli and pant who plays on those grounds..do u think the selectors should also consider this fact?Also everyone picks jaiswal and pant as an automatic selection for t20 worldcup based on their test records.pant played 66 t20 internationals and has a poor strike rate and he never performed including in world ups..his test record is amazing and should allow to the test squad considering what he has done for India in tests..like SKY and rohit in t20’s..I think Sanju deserves a spot in the playing eleven more than anyone not just as a wicket keeper but as a batter..what’s ur thoughts on abishek Sharma as an opener instead of jaiswal?he seems to have better hitting ability than jaiswal
Honestly speaking never thought about it but you have such a valid point..
This gives serious advantage to people who are having these grounds as home grounds..
Let me think little more on that
This point of yours seriously gives Sanju a big edge cz yes, he has performed on much difficult wickets..
But these important details at times go under the radar which shouldn't be the case..
Brilliant insight I must say
Abhishek Sharma needs little time at International level cz that level is different from IPL
We have seen it multiple times in the past that IPL stars fail miserably on the International level
Also seriously disagree with the pressure situation performance of pant ..that’s a different format..VVS laxman has scored 271 under pressure in second innings that doesn’t make him a good t20 matter.pant has failed in big matches in t20’s so as Rahul..but I would prefer Rahul over pant any day..pant is overrated in t20 and he will struggle on slow wickets that’s a guarantee..I feel always people find arguments to not include sanju in the squad..His average this season is 77 ..he mostly comes after powerplay..strikes at 161..Second run getter..most innings were match winning.what more performance would u expect from a player..if u need to prove in international cricket he needs to get continues chances like dhoni give to rohit or capitans backed sewag after his inconsistency’s..India last won a t20 worldcup in 2007 with an inexperienced squad and players like uthappa played fearless cricket in that.rohit also played important cameos..so I would also argue on the abhishek’s case..he is clean hitter and has comfortably technic and reads spin very well
@@Nidhin674you know I just saw Maidaan..
Exactly same thing came to my mind..
1983 team was inexperienced
2007 team was inexperienced
Both the times we did the unthinkable..
Big fan of you sir... just asking your take on women cricket as we know Australia's domination in women cricket as well is that all about mindset or we as Indians are more conservative
Aussie have brilliant sports culture n India it's fast picking up.. BCCI is seriously investing heavily
Fitness bro.. fitness.. In Australia, its compulsory to take up at least 3 different sports.. both for girls n boys.. they care more about sports than Maths and Languages.. :)
@@2605deepak I agree but the reason for that is their economy and dignity of labour. If if they fail in all three. they can make a living just by doing jobs which are considered menial in India ( working on a farm, restaurant, driving etc etc) whereas in India that's not the case . It gives them some cusion.
Exactly..
First world country which has been one of the pseudo colonies of the US for all these years so they've enjoyed the perks..
But we Indians will surely rise more n more from here on 😊
@@2605deepak I live in Germany so know all their tricks, which they have been using. Long way to go but very hopeful.
Post match
Aisa nehi ho sakta hain ke hum Shivam Duve and Rinku Singh dono ko le jaye?
In the ideal world.. yes..
Par 15 logon mein pta nahi aisa hoga ki nahi.. par yeh IPL mein KKR ne Rinku ko achche se use hi nahi kia
Using Test matches to select Rishabh for T20's. Waah re ky analysis karega tu. Made me laugh.
Its not about tests..
Its about handling pressure at International level..
IPL
Just think about players coming into Indian team purely based on IPL in last 10 yrs n see how many have made it big..
And also analyze the other way round
@@2605deepak You validate my point. How many cups we have won in the last 10 years. it's just because we don't give long run to anyone who performs in IPL. We keep selecting the players on their reputation and fan following. Bz your logic pujara should have been given consistent run in T20 because he performed well in test under pressure in difficult conditions. T20 is continuously evolving. I agree you might have personal favorites and biases but if you don't bring them up here, would help you more. All young player's know if they fail in 2-3 games here and there they would be axed for the big names. Pant has already played 66 T20s which is a lot and you never bring that up and instead use the test performances to justify his place. I feel that cannot be the reason. All the best.
@@2605deepak In that case use T20's as a benchmark not test's. Sanju has never been given consistent and long run. It feels they play him and hope he fails in a Inning or two so they can Axe him. While some others get such a long run. You are doing harm to the young players that way. Putting added pressure on them instead easing the pressure.
@@chetan0192 this is a also a good point.. yes.. we havn't given that..
Dear All
Ek point batao..
Few days back I said ki Sachin baakiyon se aage kyon the kyonki woh improvise karte the aur new shots add karte rehte the..
Virat spin ke against middle overs mein fas rahe hain n naya kuch add nahi kar rahe hain..
Aaj unka acid test tha.. ek fasi hui wicket pe jispe first 15-16 balls mein Gill, Sai, Miller aur even Will Jacks bilkul fas gaye the..
Par aaj Kohli ne sweep shot execute karke dikhaaya.. yeh tournament ke sabse best spin attacks mein se ek ke against aur bhi aisi wicket pe jahan aate hi runs maarna easy nahi tha..
Yeh cheezien hain jo mujhe lagta hai bohot mushkil hoti hain apni game mein change karna..
Iske chalte Will Jacks ko time mila 17 balls mein 17 maarke set hone ka aur uske baad he scored 83 runs in next 24 balls..
Will discuss this in detail tomorrow during our live show..
aapka sabka kya opinion hai?
Agree with your point too , Sachin's first 100 came in his 78th innings. Do you think batsman would get such long run these days. Imagine he was dropped after 10-20 innings saying he was not consistent. He might not have had the confidence on his skills. Sometimes we should back skills and tell the player clearly you are getting 10-20 matches straight don't worry about scores back your skills and perform.
I would also like you to discuss the fact that it took one-day cricket such a long time to evolve, 225 was considered a good score once. The first 400 score came after ages and once batsman broke that barrier and when they had no other option but go from ball one. it was chased in the same game. I feel T20 is going through the same phase now (players are becoming more fearless) some might argue it's all in favour of batsman but I would say batsman are being more fearless, I predict bowlers next season would level up and change their game. If you notice when a batsman start hitting the bowlers they become more defensive and start bowling off line deliveries and are becoming predictable. Do you think bowlers now need to change their game a little and think of different ways to make a difference? Is it the principle of causation? Cause and effect.
@@chetan0192 I agree..
But in Sachin's case few things luckily worked for him..
1. Just after his debut series against Pak (though that was also some serious assignment in those days), his next tests were in SENA countries where he scored 100s in Eng (1), Aus (2) and SA (1) and was very close to scoring 1 in NZ (was caught in 80s by John Wright, former Indian coach 🤣)
2. Till 1994, he used to bat in the middle order that too around number 6 (more like a finisher) where he was seriously good.. He was India's 2nd highest scorer in 1992 WC after Azar.. His 100s started coming only after he started opening as it was rare for middle order batters to score 100s in those days..
3. That era was such that Indian batting was pathetically low on resources due to which Sachin could survive for this long even with middling returns..
I think players like Rohit Sharma, Gill & Virat (he also had real tough time in his initial matches especially in tests) were given longer runs that too in an era when scoring 100s were a norm..
Sanju surely never had that luxury..
I met Praveen Amre in lift on Monday.. He is assistant coach of DC n we just had a very short discussion as I couldn't recognise him then 🤪but do you know he was India's one of the best players of fast bowling in 1990s and even scored a brilliant 100 on a difficult Durban wicket in 1992 but still never got any regular chances in the Indian team due to players like Ravi Shastri (He was well past his prime then) and Sanjay Manjrekar as Amre also came from Mumbai and there a strong regional bias and unsaid Regional Quota system in those days..
There have been many such players who couldn't get the chances.. I used to think that Kuldeep Yadav might also turn out to be one such case..
@@chetan0192 I was having exactly the same discussion.. also in t20s, adding one impact player is like increasing your batting resources by 20% which is a huge huge boost for any batting side..
and yes.. Bowlers will evolve.. Even all the good bowling sides will now have plans against all these hard hitting batters..
They will be under serious scrutiny.. Just see how well RCB has evolved as bowling unit in last 3 matches already.. they now seems to have a plan while bowling to all these hitters.. Be it..
Russel
Naraine
Head
Abhishek
Klaasen
Miller
all these top hitters were contained very well by RCB even though they had limited bowling resources..
@@2605deepak Started watching seriously since 1999 , Sachin was god by then grew up worshiping him. I will tell you an incident when I was a kid some of the elders from my locality pranked me and told me Sachin would start playng for Australia as he was being paid more there. I believed them and cried the whole day. Later on got to know about all the things you mentioned. But was always thinking what if Sachin was not there? would Indian cricket have been the same. Luckily these days selctors can'tbe so bias. These days we have a problem of plenty.
Post match