Why China is losing the microchip war

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.พ. 2023
  • And why the US and China are fighting over silicon in the first place.
    Subscribe and turn on notifications 🔔 so you don't miss any videos: goo.gl/0bsAjO
    In October 2022, the Biden administration placed a large-scale ban on the sale of advanced semiconductor chips to China. They also implemented a series of other rules that prevents China from making these chips on their own. These chips are used in everyday technology, like our mobile phones and computers. They’re also crucial to military and intelligence systems, which is one of the main reasons they're at the center of a feud between the United States and China.
    Microchips were first invented in the US in the 1950s, after which their use rapidly expanded worldwide. Since then, the supply chain for these chips has grown and spread to include countries in Europe and Asia. And while some countries have caught up to the US's edge in making these advanced chips, China still falls far behind despite multiple attempts to gain an advantage.
    Watch the latest episode of Vox Atlas to understand why China is losing a new cold war with the US over microchips.
    Sources and further reading:
    We found this book written by Chris Miller very helpful for understanding the history of chip development in the US and the foreign policy behind its competition and feud with China:
    Chip War: The Fight for the World's Most Critical Technology
    www.amazon.com/Chip-War-World...
    This book gave us great context on China’s efforts to acquire foreign technology:
    Chinese Industrial Espionage by Anna Puglisi
    www.amazon.com/Books-Anna-B-P...
    Articles like this by Chien-Huei Wu helped us learn more about how much the US replies on east asian countries for successful technology:
    thediplomat.com/2022/05/east-...
    Reporting by Bloomberg helped us understand major IP theft cases related to semiconductor chips:
    cset.georgetown.edu/article/e...
    An excellent report for more detail:
    Gregory Allen, CSIS www.csis.org/analysis/choking...
    Make sure you never miss behind the scenes content in the Vox Video newsletter, sign up here: vox.com/video-newsletter
    Vox.com is a news website that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines. Check out www.vox.com
    Support Vox's reporting with a one-time or recurring contribution: vox.com/contribute-now
    Shop the Vox merch store: vox.com/store
    Watch our full video catalog: goo.gl/IZONyE
    Follow Vox on Facebook: / vox
    Follow Vox on Twitter: / voxdotcom
    Follow Vox on TikTok: / voxdotcom

ความคิดเห็น • 7K

  • @grpl69
    @grpl69 ปีที่แล้ว +4959

    Some extra info: Zeiss, a german company that produces lenses is also the only company with the most advanced lenses which asml uses for their machines.

    • @xiaomeinv7
      @xiaomeinv7 ปีที่แล้ว

      zeiss在二战期间是德国纳粹的得力助手

    • @brodoxl
      @brodoxl ปีที่แล้ว +302

      yes thats why ASML bought a big part of Zeiss

    • @DrumToTheBassWoop
      @DrumToTheBassWoop ปีที่แล้ว +363

      so whoever supplies the glass to ZEISS must be the most important origin story to the worlds chips.
      Or the people that supply the sand to the glass company, that then sends to ZEISS.

    • @grpl69
      @grpl69 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@brodoxl i didnt know that, thank you!

    • @mkploeg
      @mkploeg ปีที่แล้ว +69

      @@brodoxl as far as i know ASML owns or has a big share in most of the companies that i needs to build the machines.

  • @Drrolfski
    @Drrolfski ปีที่แล้ว +7763

    I'm always surprised how relatively unknown a company like ASML is to the larger audience. It has a unique key strategic position in the world that no other company has. You don't often see that and it represents both a strength and a weakness for the free western world.

    • @sparqqling
      @sparqqling ปีที่แล้ว +183

      @@Croz89 ARM is not as critical, RISC V is a good alternative. There is no alternative to ASML, Nikon has given up on EUV. They are decade or more ahead of everybody else.

    • @geoemm
      @geoemm ปีที่แล้ว +151

      It's not that someone can or cannot build it, it's that no one can afford to build it. It's too expensive to build

    • @sumansaha295
      @sumansaha295 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      How did china get to 7nm without ASML

    • @stashiv
      @stashiv ปีที่แล้ว +54

      It's not surprising at all. How many people know what lithography is?

    • @citizenkane2349
      @citizenkane2349 ปีที่แล้ว +160

      "free western world"
      Ironic.

  • @kendrickainsworth8376
    @kendrickainsworth8376 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +495

    Vox: China will lose the chip war
    Huawei : Hold My Mate 60 Pro

    • @KhangdrAntonio-hg2kf
      @KhangdrAntonio-hg2kf 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      lol

    • @thesenate8477
      @thesenate8477 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yea china is totally winning they are so advanced they basically mass produced a chip technology which the world mass produced in 2016 (7 years ago) lol

    • @arnhut12-uy9ur
      @arnhut12-uy9ur 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Huawei still uses ARM architecture for their chips :(

    • @fmn0013
      @fmn0013 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Its chip uses outdated technology, but its price is no cheaper than new technology mobile phones

    • @aditsaki5697
      @aditsaki5697 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@arnhut12-uy9urand he say win 😂😂😂😂

  • @virusinc
    @virusinc 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +297

    This did not age well.. Just 6 months later, Huawei is selling millions of phones with native 7nm 5G SOCs

    • @bannie8933
      @bannie8933 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      You actually believed that Huawei could make the advanced chips independently? Well if they could really do that why are they keeping silent about the details of the chip?

    • @user-fv4kk8ec6f
      @user-fv4kk8ec6f 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

      @@bannie8933 Then please explain who you think did it? I'm all ears.

    • @niuliu6504
      @niuliu6504 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      @@bannie8933 I think those chips are made by TSMC or Samsung or Intel, please investigate fully and sanction them :)

    • @SamuelSo1018
      @SamuelSo1018 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@bannie8933白皮猪现在还是想不明白吧哈哈

    • @Daniel-szj
      @Daniel-szj 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      @@niuliu6504 Now it has been confirmed that it is China's own chip.

  • @SidenoteChannel
    @SidenoteChannel ปีที่แล้ว +2676

    Brilliant video. Thanks.
    While it may seem like the "chip war" is between China and the US allies, it's actually pretty 2 dimensional. US allies (Japan, South Korea and Taiwan) too are competing among themselves to out-pace each other. No one wants to end up in a situation where it can be casted out easily. While TSMC (of Taiwan) is building new plants in both America and Japan, their foreign investments do not involve most advanced technology, keeping the US' incentive to defend Taiwan from China intact.
    Both Japan and South Korea has announced their own set of lucrative subsidies to poach companies from each other countries. They are also worried about losing market share in China and China hampering the supply chain of raw materials if it feels cornered.
    This is just the beginning.

    • @bremcurt9514
      @bremcurt9514 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@ThePirateParrot Explain?

    • @SidenoteChannel
      @SidenoteChannel ปีที่แล้ว +40

      @@user-gc1hg9sp9k True but as long as the politics side of things are concerned, this video sums up things pretty well.

    • @msytdc1577
      @msytdc1577 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      TSMC not building much internationally isn't about geopolitics and having a reason to defend Taiwan, it is a practical business case of having your engineers and researchers close to the manufacturing lines as there is a synergy of the various aspects of their business that having far flung branches does not grant them.

    • @SidenoteChannel
      @SidenoteChannel ปีที่แล้ว +42

      @@msytdc1577 Company's officials may know the real reason but there's anxiety among Taiwanese people for sure. Opposition has blamed the ruling party for "gifting TSMC to the US". The chairman of TSMC cleared the tension last December by telling that they're investing more in South Taiwan than what they did in the US. There can be more than one reason behind a move.

    • @Praise___YaH
      @Praise___YaH ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Guys, here is the Savior
      YaH The Heavenly FATHER HIMSELF was Who they Crucified/Pierced for our sins and “HERE IS THE PROOF”
      From the Ancient Egyptian Semitic:
      "Yad He Vav He" is what Moshe (Moses) wrote, when Moses asked YaH His Name (Exodus 3)
      Ancient Egyptian Semitic Direct Translation
      Yad - "Behold The Hand"
      He - "Behold the Breath"
      Vav - "Behold The NAIL"

  • @geoemm
    @geoemm ปีที่แล้ว +2025

    ASML is the most important company in the world most people have never heard of.

    • @MaximSupernov
      @MaximSupernov ปีที่แล้ว +84

      ASML is well known in Asia.

    • @samsonsoturian6013
      @samsonsoturian6013 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      Well, there's Fiserv, United Health, Protor & Gamble, Merck and others.

    • @golfyoohoo
      @golfyoohoo ปีที่แล้ว +50

      @@MaximSupernov NMSL is also well known in Asia.

    • @KICK839
      @KICK839 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      Most people in west*

    • @whatsursource
      @whatsursource ปีที่แล้ว

      Might just be the reason the biggest war of this millenia. Technology has become the power of military

  • @eternalobi
    @eternalobi 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +285

    Maybe Vox should make a video about Why China is losing the Space station war. or the GPS war. or the EV war. all of which is sanctioned by the US.

    • @xukevin5271
      @xukevin5271 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +92

      Hey, they can make a Video about 90 genders, China definitely falls way way behind😅

    • @joeblack888
      @joeblack888 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Well said @eternalobi! Space station is another good example for sure.

    • @thesheepthemightythecrazy
      @thesheepthemightythecrazy 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@glowiedetector sarcasm.

    • @venos7184
      @venos7184 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@thesheepthemightythecrazy 你看一下新闻就知道,目前神舟17号的航天员还在空间站上呢……中国研发GPS是不想在可能的战争时期受制于美国的GPS,这更多是军事用途,并没有输赢。至于新能源车,中国的汽车企业确实通过新能源车获取了很多中国国内的市场份额,而比亚迪的销量在前不久刚刚超过了特斯拉。感觉这个朋友的消息源确实很片面,可能这也是这个频道观众的共同点。

    • @Daniel-szj
      @Daniel-szj 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      What you said, China has its own system.

  • @grahamflower6202
    @grahamflower6202 ปีที่แล้ว +2372

    As a person who has spent 35 years in silicon valley's chip industry, while this video has many things right it also misses many pieces of the puzzle. Labor cost is not the primary reason chip manufacturing moved offshore. A huge factor was that chip fabs are extremely expensive and capital for building them was very expensive in the USA in the 80s when this trend really ramped up. The inflation of the 70s was a mighty contributor to that. Yes, it is true that the south Korean and Taiwanese governments were very supportive of having their engineering students pursue graduate education in the USA and such students often dominated the Semiconductor section of American Graduate schools from at least the late 1970s. In my grad school 20 of 23 Research Assistants in Semiconductor physics were from either Taiwan or S. Korea. only 2 were Americans. Taiwan and S. Korea saw the strategic value while American politicians didnt distinguish between potato chips and semiconductor chips as one politico explicitly stated.

    • @JoeChang1999
      @JoeChang1999 ปีที่แล้ว +261

      As a person who grew up in Taiwan, I can confirm that not only the country but the entire society encourages students to study EE. Ever since middle school, I have been told that EE is the king of engineering from parents, teachers, and the news. They don’t tell people to pursue their dreams like most Americans do. Instead, I was told that if I want a house, a car, and a wife, I should study EE. The successful path to take is to study EE undergrad in Taiwan, then EE grad in top US schools, and only after I’ve done that, I can have a life.

    • @01710F
      @01710F ปีที่แล้ว +98

      @@JoeChang1999 same in here s.korea.

    • @alphatron464
      @alphatron464 ปีที่แล้ว +54

      @@JoeChang1999So how are you doing now? Did you finish your graduate education in US or are you a engineer in TSML? I’m just curious since I’m also a student who will study in the US and might major in Electronic Microfabrication

    • @nababsk9153
      @nababsk9153 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ঝ্যন

    • @buddhilal220
      @buddhilal220 ปีที่แล้ว

  • @pratickkkk
    @pratickkkk ปีที่แล้ว +3312

    Every now and then Vox just makes me fall in love with this world and its geopolitics, loved it

    • @prajwalmeshram32
      @prajwalmeshram32 ปีที่แล้ว +106

      You would love Johnny Harris as well then

    • @wrightclick
      @wrightclick ปีที่แล้ว +55

      @@prajwalmeshram32 Pretty sure Harris get his start as a writer / producer for Vox, too!

    • @oduwancheekee
      @oduwancheekee ปีที่แล้ว +56

      Pls don't call it "geopolitics", it's just international politics, geopolitics implies linkage to geography, which is just not the case.

    • @JeremySchilder
      @JeremySchilder ปีที่แล้ว +156

      @@oduwancheekee I think geopolitics can be applied here considering we just stared at a map for 10 minutes and Taiwan is roughly 100 miles off the coast of China.

    • @omniyambot9876
      @omniyambot9876 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      just so manyy inaccuracies in one video. typical video essays, but it's good enough for beginners. love the graphics.

  • @mr.alrightty2902
    @mr.alrightty2902 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +174

    This video has aged well - we banned a country with tens of thousands of engineers from accessing reasonable priced easily accessible chips, forced them to develop their own technology and now they can do it themselves.

    • @vipetherap2722
      @vipetherap2722 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      You say "we" as if you are from America, but you are in China 🤣

    • @mr.alrightty2902
      @mr.alrightty2902 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +67

      @@vipetherap2722 sure basement buddy, I’m commenting on TH-cam in a country that has no access to it

    • @hanfucolorful9656
      @hanfucolorful9656 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@mr.alrightty2902 You have access to TH-cam, but what you don't know is that China has so much fun, all kinds of entertainments, that are not available in the US and in the rest of the world, although we upload them (videos) to TH-cam, TH-cam (algorithm) does not send these video to English audiences, to make sure that the US and the English world do not know the real China. If they knew their faith collapse.
      How do I know this? I watched over 100 of these entertainments videos but noticed almost that the comments are in all kinds of languages but rare in English.

    • @GaryQ-ts3lb
      @GaryQ-ts3lb 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      It kinda backfired. Forced them to give up on seeking sources abroad and gone onto a total different direction to solve the issue internally. Like they always do.

    • @petepowaaa
      @petepowaaa 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The fab has to be profitable to be worthwhile. Huawei’s chip cannot be produced at scale hence it’s not remotely close to being a sustainable path for China

  • @SleepyGiant67
    @SleepyGiant67 ปีที่แล้ว +1126

    I wrote my thesis on this very topic about 1 1/2 years ago and it is always great to see this topic get brought up more and more

    • @chadatchison145
      @chadatchison145 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      If you don't mind me asking, what do you think of a cold war with China? I'm reading that it's could be a good thing rather than bad, but no one seems give any details either way.

    • @Booz2010
      @Booz2010 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      More and more HYPERSONIC Missile news update to come 👀💯

    • @demogia4996
      @demogia4996 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@chadatchison145 The reason why the United States is in a cold war with China is to contain China’s development and prevent China’s GDP from surpassing that of the United States, not to defend human rights or ideology. Otherwise, there is no way to explain why the United States is still very friendly with Saudi Arabia and the US supported the Taliban organization, which later launched 911

    • @chadatchison145
      @chadatchison145 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@demogia4996 I know, I just basically want to know the pros and cons of a cold war with China, most people talk about cold wars as ominous and frightening but it seems to me that they add stability of sorts to the political world stage, but I'm sure there's more to it than that and I'd like to know the bigger picture.

    • @tm-te9mh
      @tm-te9mh ปีที่แล้ว +9

      if you don't mind sharing it, would love to read it.

  • @bbtankc
    @bbtankc ปีที่แล้ว +2382

    The production of this is fantastic and really shows the pressures that both countries face. Great job by the production team.

    • @edgar.e.t.higgins
      @edgar.e.t.higgins ปีที่แล้ว

      Bobby, I hope that one day you find what you most desire in your life. Never give up; I believe in you ❤ also can you do my laundry?

    • @antihypocrisy8978
      @antihypocrisy8978 ปีที่แล้ว

      The US is setting a precedent for China and India on how to bully others when they are the largest economy in the world.

    • @bhaskarmehra8758
      @bhaskarmehra8758 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Really? Did you see the so-called exponential graph?

    • @AllendeNL
      @AllendeNL ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@bhaskarmehra8758 you’re being knit picky

    • @bhaskarmehra8758
      @bhaskarmehra8758 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@AllendeNL no, I don't think so. especially when they use such a graph to explain an important underpinning concept. Like at 3:23, makes no sense.

  • @johnyossarian9059
    @johnyossarian9059 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    This did not age well...

    • @bassyey
      @bassyey 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      How? Nobody wants to use chinese chips. Trash performance.

  • @mrbardel4363
    @mrbardel4363 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    China has not lost the war yet .
    and time is on the side of China .

  • @cobalt1754
    @cobalt1754 ปีที่แล้ว +1625

    As someone who works as a scientific glassblower for the semiconductor industry, it's really interesting to see the geopolitical impact of some of the components we use.
    We just make the glass and send it off, without really knowing how the apparatuses are used. This is the first time I've seen one of our customers mentioned outside of work.

    • @Fan4toggo
      @Fan4toggo ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Do you work for Zeiss?

    • @arian6565
      @arian6565 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      how have you not already heard about this, this isn't recent news

    • @user-wg9zq1ee8f
      @user-wg9zq1ee8f ปีที่แล้ว +60

      我是中国人,中国唯一的错误就是威胁到美国的地位,从苏联,日本,欧盟,中国,美国打压中国没错,世界丛林法则,任何国家站在美国的位置,不会允许有人威胁自己的地位,所以让我们拭目以待,看看中美竞争,谁是最后的胜利者,大国竞争,小国成为牺牲品,别无选择,任人摆布😂😂😂

    • @blueorangesun
      @blueorangesun ปีที่แล้ว

      @@user-wg9zq1ee8f So stealing proprietary technology from companies who spent years and billions is ok here? From its history, ccp has proven again that they cannot be trusted with their word or their intentions.

    • @danzwku
      @danzwku ปีที่แล้ว +3

      which customer is that?

  • @mapletibits6372
    @mapletibits6372 ปีที่แล้ว +446

    First, am not here to defend China (If you're a hater, then move on. I am here for evident-based discussion). Second, Vox team did a great job on summarizing tech/chip war happening now between China vs US in 10 min vid.
    My first critic, the title is an eye-grabber; this war is on-going and China has not lost yet. It should be better titled, 'Why China is losing the microchip war up to this point'.
    Now for some details not presented in the video to add another layer to this discussion.
    First point on microchip itself: while microchip indeed are essential in all modern tech, the advanced chips (10nm) and the ones that China is losing right now is the advanced chips (

    • @surelo9996
      @surelo9996 ปีที่แล้ว

      China is theft of everything

    • @willaimoconnell9430
      @willaimoconnell9430 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      1) a lot of real life counterfactuals would provide evidence that the not disciplined enough productivity slur is a racial trope and a self interested claim by a CEO. Doesn't matter, it's far from factual and clearly convenient.
      2) 5-10 years in a Chinese sector known for extensive corruption and visionware is a long time and a long reality from consistent dependable quality chip production.
      3) None of this mentions industrial software development skills. Which is a problem for China and subject to a whole separate ring of tech sanctions.
      4) Capital is at a premium in China and all of this requires massive investment over years.
      I'm sure China could overcome this, but the list of other critical challenges is a long one. The real question is how long ( for I am certain China will) when several competing calls on national priority demand time, capital and human attention?

    • @surelo9996
      @surelo9996 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      China will be giant north korea in 10 years. We will not be able to see chinese from china anymore like in 1980s. I remember when i first saw chinese in vancouver i was shouting : mom see, chinese. Just like if we see north korean on the street today...mom look, its north korean....

    • @user-mc1gc9uj5p
      @user-mc1gc9uj5p 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +54

      Dued , you really think this account videos are meant to discuss the real issue? They want to know what they already know.Don't waste time on them.They really want to know: when and how China lose.

    • @nickngunjiri4282
      @nickngunjiri4282 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      ​@@surelo9996lol 😂 Chinese population in the United States existed before the 1980s, see Chinatowns in Manhattan, Brooklyn (three), and Queens. Manhattan.

  • @RyukoMeows
    @RyukoMeows 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    This video aged badly.

    • @danxu3064
      @danxu3064 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Like your mom

    • @RyukoMeows
      @RyukoMeows 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@danxu3064 This video aged badly.

    • @abdirahmanahmadalifarah926
      @abdirahmanahmadalifarah926 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@danxu3064 😂😂😂 you're coping hard..

  • @huawen630
    @huawen630 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +178

    Last week, Huawei Phone with made-in-China MPU has been released, which support 5G network as well as satellite call at the same time. Let's tell whether China is losing the war after a few years from now.

    • @Username-mn7pc
      @Username-mn7pc 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Its 7nm . Apple had 3nm chips

    • @ninjanick3152
      @ninjanick3152 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +54

      ​@@Username-mn7pc the first step is always hard,but its just a beginning

    • @Mr.O-Saft_2024
      @Mr.O-Saft_2024 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      😂😂😂😂😂 well this satellite call is working well hahaha

    • @shuli6021
      @shuli6021 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      usa can not make 2nm chips itself@@Username-mn7pc

    • @juanpablosanchezaveleyra6454
      @juanpablosanchezaveleyra6454 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      ​​@@Username-mn7pcSo what? Do you even understand what the difference is between 7 and 4? It's just slight efficiency. 7nm is enough for anything in the world. 90% of the chip market uses 28nm+ including military. it's just phones that need smaller chips and a 14nm node that performs as a 4-5nm and the US labels as 7nm with 5G capabilities is enough to take back the stolen market share from the champion of "free market".

  • @TimeBucks
    @TimeBucks ปีที่แล้ว +727

    This was an absolute great video

  • @greenanthony5821
    @greenanthony5821 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +166

    Who can imagine China makes breakthrough only 7 months after this video was released. Slap!

    • @guill90
      @guill90 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      What breakthrough are you talking about?

    • @tanjim4487
      @tanjim4487 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

      @@guill90 China has 7nm chips already and they are about to ramp up production of 5nm chips in near future. So, the U.S. isn't really stopping them from getting the tech, they are actually fastening the process of new breakthroughs in Chinese chip making.

    • @GTFO_0
      @GTFO_0 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂😂trur

    • @flyingtothemoon4271
      @flyingtothemoon4271 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Thanks US for sanctioning so China is developing their own. 👍 Congrats ❤️

    • @guill90
      @guill90 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @flyingtothemoon4271 China was already pursuing its own. SMIC already existed and was already getting subsidies.

  • @qizhang2032
    @qizhang2032 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    US and NATO cut weapon export to china, china developed the whole weapon sysytem by itself, EU excluded china from Galileo project and china developed its own Beidou navigation system, and now china can produce some old version of chips,

  • @tx9ju
    @tx9ju 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +75

    Thanks to SMIC which produces Huawei's 7nm Kirin 9000 chip,
    Now China not only doesn't need TSMC but also ASML👏

    • @Not_a_lier
      @Not_a_lier 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Hello the world is currently on 5nm and preparimg for 3nm (atleast how they are branded)

    • @user-tx5es2hg4x
      @user-tx5es2hg4x 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@Not_a_lier well china is now 3 years behind , soon they are going to catch up good luck

    • @yerri5567
      @yerri5567 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Not_a_lier nm isnt everything. Even Intel had been stuck on 10nm for ages and was competing with TSMCs 7nm. Chinas SMICs 7nm N+2 is equivalent to TSMCs 5nm. Just with a 1-2% difference. Just google it if you dont believe me.
      And heres a fun fact, we are nearing the physical limitation on how small silicon chips can be made. The smallest silicon chips possible for humans to make is just under 1nm. So after a few years whats next? Many bet its on quantum computing. And Chinas already heavily invested in that technology

    • @johnyossarian9059
      @johnyossarian9059 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@Not_a_lier Just a few months ago most people would say China could never produce their own 7nm chips

    • @aburetik4866
      @aburetik4866 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@Not_a_lier but America is still only capable of producing 10nm chips, which heavily depends on foreign technologies like the lithography systems from ASML 🤭

  • @zablacaya9298
    @zablacaya9298 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +7

    Watching this after Yellen went to China and told them about “overcapacity”!
    VOX staff: 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

  • @mtang5720
    @mtang5720 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Would you still say that now? Don't you feel like America has failed?

  • @bowei1996
    @bowei1996 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +153

    Funny to see this video after Huawei released a full in-house 7nm chip solution on the new P60 Pro. China is tightening the gap with the leaders in microchip. A 5nm chip is coming soon. Stay tuned.

    • @gilgamesh7197
      @gilgamesh7197 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Funny to see Chinese regard the trash chip as treasure. The chip is inferior to 865😂

    • @user-gn8nf7fv1t
      @user-gn8nf7fv1t 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@snoopysnoops007I believe

    • @delusionalz8707
      @delusionalz8707 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      ​@gilgamesh7197 You crying, huh?😂

    • @Not_a_lier
      @Not_a_lier 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do people even make an effort to understand semiconductors?

    • @yerri5567
      @yerri5567 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      @@gilgamesh7197 "Funny to see Chinese regard the trash chip as treasure. The chip is inferior to 865😂"
      Im not sure what youre on, but the chips been benchmarked. The in-house built Kirin 9000 performed better than Snapdragons 865. And this is the next generation Kirin 9000S we are talking about

  • @keith6371
    @keith6371 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    today Huawei shipped its mate 60 pro, this video hasn’t aged well

    • @gilgamesh7197
      @gilgamesh7197 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It’s a garbage, inferior to 865😅

    • @user-pl4ke6rk6w
      @user-pl4ke6rk6w 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@gilgamesh7197气死你咯哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈气死你略略略😝

    • @gilgamesh7197
      @gilgamesh7197 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-pl4ke6rk6w 就这么个垃圾芯片也得吹半天,笑死了哈哈哈

  • @Wazoox
    @Wazoox 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    In recent news, China produces 7nm chips with a good yield, which is as good as anything made in the US. They're closing the gap...

    • @magiclee1381
      @magiclee1381 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@IBMboy So who is the OEM of 7nm? Are you?😜

  • @iZoid
    @iZoid ปีที่แล้ว +330

    I'm losing the chip war too. my brother got to the Doritos before I did :(

    • @shinsenshogun900
      @shinsenshogun900 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Not the Doritos!
      Felt like the time I got caught in Pearl Harbor as the Yanks zeroed in on our Calbees

    • @rorytribbet6424
      @rorytribbet6424 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Stay strong brother

    • @grimsobad8545
      @grimsobad8545 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Buy up the supply chain by learning how to make your chips and boom you dominate your brother now ;)

    • @JeepnHeel
      @JeepnHeel ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I had a similar problem back in the day. Luckily, this is an easy fix -- you just need to identify and kidnap his top scientist. A few hours with The Machine and they will tell you exactly how he gets to them first.
      You will need to invest in parts for The Machine, but honestly they pay for themselves pretty quickly once you start feeding multiple scientists in at a time

    • @ON-YT
      @ON-YT ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Lol

  • @martylei9803
    @martylei9803 ปีที่แล้ว +94

    Vox had said so many things in this vid, but non of them are explaining why China is losing the war.

    • @Commander_HW
      @Commander_HW 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      because china isn't losing the war.... recently china banned the export of a rare earth element that is needed to produce the chips. So US has the software tech, a few European countries have the hardware tech, and Korea and Taiwan have the manufacturing tech, and china has the chip material.... so .... chips can't be produced without any of the parties mentioned above.

    • @garrison8020
      @garrison8020 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@GigachadicusMaximus you are underestimate Chinese wisdom。we are all ahead the tech,but we won't prove it .we have already win the competition,for we won't need a union. only loser need ally.

    • @zhongbilly3494
      @zhongbilly3494 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@GigachadicusMaximus we don't care if you bet money whatsoever, many "developed countries" have been eagerly expecting China to shut down for years and based on recent discoveries, those countries seem to be tearing apart from inside first. The guy above states the right point. Only losers need allies. When you can do it on your own, you don't even bother showing it off.

    • @cheungchingtong
      @cheungchingtong 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Because China is not losing it, and that is unspeakable.

    • @jsyo9639
      @jsyo9639 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      VOX media editor, says alot, and who funded them. 😂😂😂

  • @80130723
    @80130723 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    Like countless " China is going to collapse soon reports ". Did not aged well.

  • @yifeipei3688
    @yifeipei3688 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    This video is more about dressing the United States as the victim than the aggressor

    • @loremasteringwion9930
      @loremasteringwion9930 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why would we want our advanced chips supplying China's military in their quest to destroy us?

  • @RandallStephens397
    @RandallStephens397 ปีที่แล้ว +624

    @1:16 You've incorrectly marked the input/output terminals as transistors. The actual transistors are all the stuff in the middle.

    • @veramae4098
      @veramae4098 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Thanks.
      And oh, that's funny!

    • @nakenmil
      @nakenmil ปีที่แล้ว +31

      inb4 some really myopic computing nerd rages about how this entire video's point is invalid because of this minor mistake.

    • @sanchari.c
      @sanchari.c ปีที่แล้ว +77

      That's not at all what the original comment said. They just added that correction to the overall content, that's all - an interesting and important correction that many would like to be aware of, including me.

    • @percyvile
      @percyvile ปีที่แล้ว +23

      One of many small editing and fact checking fails we've come to expect from vox

    • @nakenmil
      @nakenmil ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@sanchari.c You seem to have missed my "inb4" ("in before"), which means I was making a joke about posting BEFORE someone does that, not that the OP was saying that.

  • @Tony-xj4he
    @Tony-xj4he 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +115

    As a Chinese, thanks to the U.S. embargo, we couldn't have developed microchip technology without you. thank you very much

    • @Tan-fe4wc
      @Tan-fe4wc 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      hahaha,comeback is real. Now they tighten the restriction even more, they really go all out in helping China developing her own technology.

    • @xukevin5271
      @xukevin5271 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Yes we are grateful. Keep banning 😂

    • @user-hc3em9pz7z
      @user-hc3em9pz7z 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      i admit we did help you. But we still have better chips maybe not for long tho.

    • @wadz555
      @wadz555 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      兄弟下次用中文评论😂

    • @CarolYeisley
      @CarolYeisley 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      哥们下次用中文更有杀伤力😂

  • @josephlagrange5158
    @josephlagrange5158 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +132

    Vox: Why China is losing the microchip war
    China: Hold my beer

    • @user-zu8rt4gt3h
      @user-zu8rt4gt3h 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No, no, we'll just silently watch,From God's perspective

  • @joem0088
    @joem0088 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    After the Kirin 9000S chip and another 7nm graphics chip for a bitcoin miner, this video can be deleted. China catching up, far exceeding the US 28nm redline. Chip Act = Cheap Act.

  • @eddiethedestroyer
    @eddiethedestroyer ปีที่แล้ว +446

    Vox, please do something about your audio mixing so the music bed is not obscuring the vocals. This has become a common problem with much of your content. Otherwise, I love the work you do and the information you are providing.

    • @TheRealDoctorBonkus
      @TheRealDoctorBonkus ปีที่แล้ว +34

      Very true, it's turning into a Christopher Nolan movie on a bad day!

    • @someone-gb2ec
      @someone-gb2ec ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Missing microchip 🤪

    • @direnova6284
      @direnova6284 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@someone-gb2ec Missing S :)

    • @205rider8
      @205rider8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Works for me as is.

    • @user-ks4eh4je8h
      @user-ks4eh4je8h ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Cant hear a thing.

  • @vinterutab2822
    @vinterutab2822 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    平均智商100以下的族群有可能短时间领先平均智商100以上的族群,少数人可能短时间领先多数人,但是平均智商100以下的少数族群绝对不可能长时间领先平均智商100以上的多数族群

    • @msvishwas5606
      @msvishwas5606 หลายเดือนก่อน

      U think iq plays very important role in innovation then r wrong US invented more advance things than china

    • @loremasteringwion9930
      @loremasteringwion9930 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Racist

    • @user-es5eo3tz7c
      @user-es5eo3tz7c 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@loremasteringwion9930

  • @rubencouso7497
    @rubencouso7497 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    This was ageing bad before Huawei Mate P 60 pro with 7 nm chip and 5 G with satellital calls :)

  • @princeliem
    @princeliem 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    this video is proved wrong by China.. lol

  • @paulyiustravelogue
    @paulyiustravelogue ปีที่แล้ว +340

    Great video. You managed to breakdown the complexity of this whole situation into easy to understand pieces for all.

    • @HumanBeingsRThinkingBeings
      @HumanBeingsRThinkingBeings ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Mind Begs the Question:
      Chinese Syping,TikTok - Not Ok
      Israeli Spying,Pegasus - Ok?

    • @boris001000
      @boris001000 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@HumanBeingsRThinkingBeings US PRISM: Amateurs

    • @HumanBeingsRThinkingBeings
      @HumanBeingsRThinkingBeings ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mind Begs the Question:
      If TikTok caused no Genocide
      If Facebook caused Religious Genocide,Civil War
      Must Ban - TikTok,Facebook?

    • @yeeaahhzz
      @yeeaahhzz ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Johnny Harris's was pretty thorough, too

    • @tardre2
      @tardre2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Jeffrey Epstein Gaming

  • @fred-shieh
    @fred-shieh ปีที่แล้ว +857

    As someone living in Taiwan, I can safely say, our chip manufacturing is one of the main reasons as to why China and US has not gone to full blown war. The stakes are just too high if we were to be destroyed in between.

    • @MadPCsuperb
      @MadPCsuperb ปีที่แล้ว +5

      More precisely, it is the reason why the U.S. is committed whole heartedly to protect TW and therefore China can’t really take over tw by force without any concerns

    • @MadPCsuperb
      @MadPCsuperb ปีที่แล้ว +16

      And it is trying to learn, (if failed), steal, (if failed), and destroy the tech

    • @4KSnSLifestyle
      @4KSnSLifestyle ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MadPCsuperb You're just delusional. China could dominate the low end chips and cut off its supplies to the world if necessary. This is what the West is worried now.

    • @Alone47
      @Alone47 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Are you familiar with the term scorched earth tactices (焦土政策)?

    • @ferencszabo3504
      @ferencszabo3504 ปีที่แล้ว +85

      So when TSMC will be transfered to the US, there is no holding back, right?

  • @DrCK2012
    @DrCK2012 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +267

    A sound slap in your face - Huawei has released 5G mobiles with indigenous 7nm chips.

    • @DragonOfTheMortalKombat
      @DragonOfTheMortalKombat 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      7nm lol while the rest of the world is using 3. Who's loosing again ?

    • @DrCK2012
      @DrCK2012 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

      @@DragonOfTheMortalKombat Hope this mere thought makes you sleep better🤣🤣🤣... but unfortunately not for long.

    • @Not_a_lier
      @Not_a_lier 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@DrCK2012❤you need EUV machines to move forward sry.

    • @chdv5736
      @chdv5736 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@Not_a_lier probably 1 year I think cuz them Chinese cooking something 🗿

    • @DrCK2012
      @DrCK2012 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      @@Not_a_lier Ho really!? 😂 Who said EUV is a must for chips under 7nm? How come the Japanese claim they can produce 5nm chips by 2025 without EUV?

  • @simony276
    @simony276 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    China ultimately can produce their own chips. It’s a country full of talents.

    • @plantiron
      @plantiron 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Talents that lack basic creativity 😂😂😂

    • @fg-ff9mo
      @fg-ff9mo 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@plantiron smile

    • @user-es5eo3tz7c
      @user-es5eo3tz7c 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@plantiron If your IQ exceeds 120, you will understand that it is difficult for smart people to lack creativity

  • @jyfuklyvfkj
    @jyfuklyvfkj ปีที่แล้ว +548

    a lot of western optoelectronic companies have moved away from China after the mid 2000's because of IP infringement. Unlike complex high-density CPU's on silicon, optoelectronic tech involves a lot of III-V semiconductor epitaxy and bespoke fab processes - once those are know it's a lot easier to replicate and sell them for a significantly cheaper price.
    In the UK a lot these industries were lost over the last couple decades. With regards to warfare we're constantly on the cusp of losing our steel industry. I guess paying profits to shareholders is a lot more important than state security.

    • @praddumnvats6759
      @praddumnvats6759 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      Duh capitalism

    • @euyie8738
      @euyie8738 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Korean companies breach IP laws all the time but they receive less smacking because they are considered as allies

    • @RLyc1111
      @RLyc1111 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      UK's best companies are lost to the US not China.

    • @GeoffreyBronson
      @GeoffreyBronson ปีที่แล้ว +13

      "State security" we can't even stop the boats.

    • @MrFastNapper
      @MrFastNapper ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@GeoffreyBronsonUK with a state of the art aircraft carrier & F35's; they are no match for rubber dinges sold at decathlon.

  • @4izm0v
    @4izm0v 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    China is now making 7nm and 5nm processors. This video aged like milk.

  • @kannayao
    @kannayao 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Well....after China Huawei released a cutting edge new phone last 2 months, i don't think they are losing.

  • @user-fo1ds3lq9q
    @user-fo1ds3lq9q 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    As former Huawei designer going through the US sanctions from the beginning, with some of my design work even finally canceled due to the lack of chips,
    Now I feel like: ✌

  • @mangguodaren7366
    @mangguodaren7366 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    I am watching the video on my HUAWEI 60 PRO.

  • @godless789
    @godless789 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    this video didnt age well.. with huawei mate 60 pro china is again the number one on the market. i regret living in europe as we will soon be the third world in terms of access to the best technologies. asia is the future.

  • @RiseOfAsia
    @RiseOfAsia 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +80

    I'm watching this video on my Huawei Mate 60 Pro 🤣🤣🤣

    • @thesenate8477
      @thesenate8477 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Ya Huawei Mate 60 pro which uses 7 nm chip technology which is almost 10 years old (IBM made first 7 nm chip in 2015). Losers 😂😂😂😂😂

    • @godless789
      @godless789 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      @@thesenate8477 are you writing this on your iphone with a 20W charger that is 100 years old xD xD

    • @kaisiangtey8964
      @kaisiangtey8964 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@thesenate8477 Currently only Samsung, TSMC and SMIC could mass produce 7nm at the effective cost and high yield rate.

    • @huanluo1741
      @huanluo1741 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🤣🤣🤣👍

    • @xogeneral1512
      @xogeneral1512 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@thesenate8477 source : hollywoood tells me that

  • @my33311
    @my33311 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    Are you sure China is losing the chip war? How about Huawei chip 9000s and 980A AI chip?

    • @glorioustrap
      @glorioustrap 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China will soon run into a major roadblock called EUV, is only a matter of time before they overcome that, but the question is how long? The longer the chip disadvantage lasts for China, the harder it is for China to dominate the AI market, which is the most demanding field for semiconductors atm. However, once China catches up, China will present full-scale competition in every aspect of the semiconductor industry and the subsequent industries. China is not winning atm as they are still behind and have many obstacles to overcome, the items you listed indeed reflect their ambition and their potential. But they are still leagues behind and have much to catch up on, so those achievements It is not a signal of triumphant but a declaration of war, announcing they are still willing to fight back.

    • @my33311
      @my33311 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@glorioustrap I am telling you right here. China doesn't need EUV to run a 7nm or 5nm AI or whatever chip. Does it make sense? Right now Huawei already made 7nm chips and AI chips. Right now. Your question how long is meaningless. When you reach 1nm that's it and no more. Everyone then will start all over again with new technology. China is still leading again. Frankly, USA is unable to win the tech war with China. Really hopeless. The USA has to accept its fate.

    • @glorioustrap
      @glorioustrap 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ql1162 No they need euv or other equivalent alternatives to go even further. Multiple exposure they r doing with duv is expensive and not efficient.

    • @glorioustrap
      @glorioustrap 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Is called multiple patterning, that's how they achieve it. To achieve what they did, they had to expose it so many times, that is both costly and difficult to achieve, not to mention the yield rate drops with each exposure, and it will be harder and harder to achieve the smaller it gets. To put it simple, doing it with DUV to achieve 5nm is no different than making a wooden carving with a dull axe, while using euv would be like using a small knife.

    • @my33311
      @my33311 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@glorioustrap harder it does not mean can't make. Yes it is called multiple patterning. Their target is to break the sanction from the US in the first priority in a short time. They will make their own EUV in the mid term and the long time they are using new technologies to replace EUV. Huawei reached the first target this year by selling their smartphone mate 60 pro with the 7nm chip technology. Currently China must make sure the sanction from the US is invalid to defeat the US.

  • @humpydumpy2432
    @humpydumpy2432 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +9

    Chinese are laughing on this video because they are manufacturing 5 nm chips

  • @harku123
    @harku123 ปีที่แล้ว +301

    US is ahead but they're not winning, china can catch up eventually and something that isn't mentioned in the video is that Moore's law is slowing down because we're reaching a limit. Semiconductors are getting close to atomic sizes and reaching a cap on how small we can make them. This is why quantum computers are being researched so much now due to how their memory capacity functions thanks to qubit superpositions allowing for more states than just 0 and 1

    • @B21_raider
      @B21_raider ปีที่แล้ว +1

      China is not even close to us

    • @J_X999
      @J_X999 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      Can quantum computers be produced on the same scale though? Silicon chips are great not because of size of speed, but scale.

    • @satwikmekala9389
      @satwikmekala9389 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      @@J_X999 It will similar to how microchips were developed first they will be extremely expensive so only governments or large entities will be able to buy it. Eventually the price will start to go down as manufacturing and design start to scale

    • @user-gc1hg9sp9k
      @user-gc1hg9sp9k ปีที่แล้ว +33

      Not to mention that china is the largest producer of Sillicon(Accounted for 80 percent of the world production), the most important raw material for building a chip
      This basic Supply chain are overlook by the US politician and media

    • @melon5111
      @melon5111 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      For more context, the smallest transistor ever made in a CPU is 2 nanometers wide (Made by IBM). Some atoms are as large as 0.5 nanometers wide, meaning we're quite literally running into the physical size limit of our universe.

  • @kangbule
    @kangbule 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Even the United States cannot manufacture 3nm chips, and high-end chip manufacturing can only be done in Asia. The United States is losing hundreds of billions of dollars in chip profits, wish the United States good luck

  • @virginiachang10
    @virginiachang10 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Huawei mate 60 pro just came out 1 week ago. This video needs an update!

    • @gilgamesh7197
      @gilgamesh7197 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Huawei chip still a garbage 😂

    • @jaoolai5299
      @jaoolai5299 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@gilgamesh7197no doubt, just like Japanese products back in 80s, guess wht in your daily life now, you r using their products!

  • @lisadsouza5061
    @lisadsouza5061 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    You can ban them from advance chips but you can't stop them from development. Sooner or later they will have to develop because it's also matter survival for them as a country.

    • @MrYoshigu
      @MrYoshigu ปีที่แล้ว +1

      US banned China from the ISS, 10 years later…China has its own space station.

    • @Rai2M
      @Rai2M ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A lot of countries keep surviving w/o developing chips.

    • @lisadsouza5061
      @lisadsouza5061 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Rai2M did you read what asml CEO said today about baning china from so called superior tech.

    • @looseygoosey1349
      @looseygoosey1349 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      and? We want them to struggle. If it would have taken them 10 years before now it would take 15-20. Time is money and gives the US
      time to invest and R&D new tech to stay on top.

    • @zhiwang6529
      @zhiwang6529 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@looseygoosey1349 lol let's see, you have a point but maybe China can go faster

  • @Lovric_F
    @Lovric_F ปีที่แล้ว +399

    This kind of videos are the reason why I subscribed to Vox. More of these please!

    • @Krafcisin19375
      @Krafcisin19375 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Could not agree more

    • @masivuye4485
      @masivuye4485 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Vox used to be the go to channel 😭😭

    • @rcbrascan
      @rcbrascan ปีที่แล้ว

      Vox is funded by the US government and it follows the US government views so there is an impartiality problem.

    • @hkhkl6630
      @hkhkl6630 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Johnny harris did the same video two weeks ago..

    • @AllenBaby7
      @AllenBaby7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@masivuye4485 Yess but now we have skilful creators from Vox independently doing video journalism like Jhonny Harris and Cleo. Jhonny's channel imo is more awesome than even Vox's.

  • @glassesman5440
    @glassesman5440 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    wow Vox a great organisation with 0 credibility😂

  • @qoo4121
    @qoo4121 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    China:Learn how to be humourous via Vox🤣🤣🤣

    • @RogueSkull
      @RogueSkull 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Humorous you say? Us has already developed chips in angstroms, not even nanometer scale anymore. China is 10yrs behind.

    • @qoo4121
      @qoo4121 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@RogueSkull Congrats to US😉. BTW not only chips, the age of the China president is 10 yrs behind US. And US people can enjoy developed Esptein island industry that China never had. 100yrs behind in this field. Show respect to US😉

    • @yadongzheng4821
      @yadongzheng4821 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@qoo4121 When the Afghanistan, Vietnam and other nations that were 50 years or more behind the US in tech and industry, the Uncle Sam still could not secure a complete victory. Anyway, I completely understand the notion of the American. After all, their tech and industry have long located at the top of the world, and they are too immersed in this type of status. However, in their perspective 100 years may be long, but in our point of view, that's only a fraction of the history. In this case, if they claim that they are ahead of you for 10 years or 30 years anyway, just agree them. Do the right thing and make progress everyday is the most important. Please keep in mind my bro, each one step closer to them, their arrogance decreases one point.

  • @chrischen1178
    @chrischen1178 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Losing or Winning? Think twice before making any prediction content.

  • @riyantrianggaputra4118
    @riyantrianggaputra4118 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    Pls tell me why china now had 7nm chip ?

    • @shooting4star2023
      @shooting4star2023 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The numbers in nm have become a marketing tool with less true technical bearing. Companies can call whatever they want. Huawei may turn around next starting calling their chip 1 nm.

  • @ngchenghow
    @ngchenghow 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Huawei mate 60 5G selling, US already lose tech war

  • @514broly
    @514broly 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    This video did not age well. This is what happens when people underestimate the Chinese, arrogantly thinking only the West can innovate. A year or 2 from now, this video will look even more ridiculous.

    • @karma-kf9gy
      @karma-kf9gy 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why didn't it age well?

    • @jeannedarc7533
      @jeannedarc7533 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@karma-kf9gy One word: Huawei.

    • @RobertNeptune
      @RobertNeptune หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@karma-kf9gyChina is on 5nm track now. After this there is no significant obstacle ahead. In fact, 3nm does not excel as expected.

  • @ngchenghow
    @ngchenghow 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Huawei release mate 60 pro with 5G 7nm chip, made in China, US lose the chip war in just 3 years

    • @gilgamesh7197
      @gilgamesh7197 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      not inferior to 865, still lost 😂

  • @paradigm2002
    @paradigm2002 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Aged like milk 😂

  • @jiachen2526
    @jiachen2526 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Now this clip is a joke, LOL

  • @gojosatorunitennitengojosatoru
    @gojosatorunitennitengojosatoru 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    现在回来看这个真的是好笑~~

  • @user-zt2sd9ry3y
    @user-zt2sd9ry3y 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    As a Chinese, I'm more than happy that you really think so😊

  • @FranciscoGalarraga
    @FranciscoGalarraga 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    This video didnt age well lol.

  • @shuipingmo5114
    @shuipingmo5114 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    They said China is/was/has been/will be failing starting from when my father learnt reading

  • @user-wl1qw3rn7c
    @user-wl1qw3rn7c 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    The United States is trying its best to suppress Huawei. Huawei mate60pro 5G mobile phone is released, and the self-developed Kirin 9000s 5G SOC is back. Let's slap those who think they can defeat Chinese semiconductors! I like to watch you guys talk freely, but none of them become reality!🤣🤣

    • @loremasteringwion9930
      @loremasteringwion9930 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China wants to destroy the US and you want our advanced chips to be used to strengthen the Chinese military in their quest to destroy us?

  • @marijnwicherink2304
    @marijnwicherink2304 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    The story of ASML and Eindhoven itself is already a really interesting one. Great video!

  • @user-yb1vr9xw2z
    @user-yb1vr9xw2z 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    HUAWEI:Are you sure about that?

  • @yourdebankittoys8288
    @yourdebankittoys8288 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Always love the videos in this series. Excellent job again!

  • @zhiwang6529
    @zhiwang6529 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    This didn't age well...

  • @yifuhood
    @yifuhood 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    love to visit here again next year. maybe every year. I downond this video , for future use in my class. How's the Western media has the discrediting them self? Great historical evidence

    • @ruifenghuang1029
      @ruifenghuang1029 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I suggest the NYT piece "An act of war ..." by Alex Palmer

  • @jglg7238
    @jglg7238 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    this didn't age well.

  • @yudoc-bn9to
    @yudoc-bn9to 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    😂maybe,you need to buy a latest mate 60 pro with kirin 9000s

  • @zacharydavis4398
    @zacharydavis4398 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks for spending the time to create and share this content awareness

  • @johnli6430
    @johnli6430 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    Huawei Mate 60 destroyed this video immediately lol
    Slap!Slap!😅😅😅

  • @TellenJones
    @TellenJones 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    Think they miss-spelled "Wish" as "Why".

  • @fengkuangyu7116
    @fengkuangyu7116 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    2023.08.29, Huawei released its new flagship smart phone, mate 60 series!

  • @user-tk5oq6zb2y
    @user-tk5oq6zb2y 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    At only 7 moths since this video was released, huawei mate 60 pro now leads the market...

    • @no6875
      @no6875 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂6500YUAN的4.999G手机,确实是“leads the market” 遥遥领先了😂,还诞生了一个meme“遥遥领先”被中国网友津津乐道着。

  • @behere146
    @behere146 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    good job,guy😆 - from huawei mate 60 pro

  • @earthtothe9791
    @earthtothe9791 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    losing No, it just hold back China but the pressure will only push China to develop more faster, that are countless cases in the past when west sanction China in particular technology, yet them all break through.

    • @earthtothe9791
      @earthtothe9791 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Haha my prediction did come true

    • @Freedom_from_imp
      @Freedom_from_imp 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The west is incapable of learning from their past mistakes. The space station, GPS and Hsr are three examples.

  • @CarlZha
    @CarlZha หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Checking in 1 year later. How did it pan out? Laughs in Chinese

    • @Ateshtesh
      @Ateshtesh 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      OMG! I also follow your channel I came here just to see the commentaries now.
      Good to see you here! =D

  • @Christine-qs3mc
    @Christine-qs3mc ปีที่แล้ว +7

    谢谢你 忽悠局 爱你哟❤

  • @lupingyang2511
    @lupingyang2511 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Slap in the face 😂

  • @xiaolvwuming6199
    @xiaolvwuming6199 ปีที่แล้ว +276

    It was easy for the US to deal with the former Soviet Union, it was just a military superpower. It's easier to deal with the Japanese, they're just an economic challenge. However, dealing with China is a bit difficult. It is a military power plus an economic challenge plus a technological rival plus a diplomatic rival.
    Thing is, bullies often don’t realize that they’re bullying people…

    • @hamzamahmood9565
      @hamzamahmood9565 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      Soviet Union was definitely a technological and diplomatic rival as well, although less so on the economic front. And I don't expect the Chinese military to reach USSR levels of threat anytime soon....they have ZERO modern combat experience

    • @xiaolvwuming6199
      @xiaolvwuming6199 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      @@hamzamahmood9565 The Pentagon doesn't think so

    • @hamzamahmood9565
      @hamzamahmood9565 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      ​@Antiinzō Kim Pentagon says China is the biggest threat today, yes. But it doesn't consider China to be as threatening as USSR was in the 1950s and 1960s. Those were the days where America was under constant threat of nuclear annihilation, and if we managed to overcome that, we can manage China.

    • @user-ul5lw6or8w
      @user-ul5lw6or8w 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hamzamahmood9565 You remind me of Herman Cain, who was preparing to run for US president in 2012. He said that "if he is elected president of the United States, he will definitely prevent China from obtaining nuclear weapons." An American elite knows nothing about China, let alone you. China may not have as many nuclear weapons as the United States, but it is enough to destroy the United States dozens of times.

    • @user-uu56
      @user-uu56 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

      @@hamzamahmood9565 Although the overall atmosphere of direct nuclear conflict between the US and USSR was more present. In terms of higher probability, China has definitely a higher probability of surpassing the US than USSR ever had. It has the population, economy size, military presence, diplomatic ties, everything. USSR was severely outmatched by the US in terms of economy, especially manufacturing. Even Russia today, with a population of more than 100 million, the economy is smaller than South Korea, with a population of only 55 million. However, China is literally regarded as “factory of the world”.

  • @namelesswarrior4760
    @namelesswarrior4760 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Well, it's 10 months later! Who is losing the CHIP WARS now?
    HUAWEI P60+

  • @kaiyuan-wang
    @kaiyuan-wang 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Why China is NOT losing the microchip war?

  • @fdsdfsdfsdfsify
    @fdsdfsdfsdfsify ปีที่แล้ว +405

    Amazing video, now I've got a better understanding of why the USA is so openly willing to protect Taiwan in the case if China decides to make a move.

    • @veramae4098
      @veramae4098 ปีที่แล้ว +94

      Also, treaties.
      Also, democracy vs. dictatorship.

    • @alextjflorida
      @alextjflorida ปีที่แล้ว +66

      PROTECT my a**.

    • @toolbaggers
      @toolbaggers ปีที่แล้ว

      You finally found out the US only has purely selfish reasons not 'freedom' whenever they threaten or wage war? Keep waking up, there is much more to see and know!

    • @JuanCasa2001
      @JuanCasa2001 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      In 1955 President Eisenhower promised that we would defend Taiwan. We're in a treaty

    • @chunglin_tang
      @chunglin_tang ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JuanCasa2001 The original 1955 Sino-American Mutual Defense Treaty has already ended after the US switched official recognition to the PRC. As of now, there is no binding treaty that the US will defend Taiwan, only Joe Biden's word :D

  • @JA-pn4ji
    @JA-pn4ji ปีที่แล้ว +201

    The chip war is not in the narrow sense about security. It is about the United States maintaining its technological superiority over a rival which in turn affects its economic and military supremacy.

    • @bikkiikun
      @bikkiikun ปีที่แล้ว

      That's the military doctrine of America... being superior to the next two or three powers combined (regardless of whether they are friendly or belligerent).

    • @havencat9337
      @havencat9337 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      a very fair thing to do, we need to listen to the masters

    • @Inevitable-Indic-revival
      @Inevitable-Indic-revival ปีที่แล้ว

      Better a democracy holding “strategic superiority” than an authoritarian meritocracy.

    • @stashiv
      @stashiv ปีที่แล้ว +33

      It may be of interest to note, Economic security falls under the national security blanket

    • @kingoftherobots
      @kingoftherobots ปีที่แล้ว +34

      which is security....

  • @umbrelloy
    @umbrelloy 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Just drop by to check out how accurate is this analysis. Btw, Huawei just released their Mate 60 pro.😂

  • @shaoyishi2100
    @shaoyishi2100 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    This video aged well...

  • @xpreame3406
    @xpreame3406 ปีที่แล้ว +463

    The Taiwan story is something people really need to pay more attention to. Learned a lot in this one.

    • @Manicsar1
      @Manicsar1 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Need to read Chip Wars

    • @paigebooks6419
      @paigebooks6419 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      yeah in syria also

    • @CM-fp2gz
      @CM-fp2gz ปีที่แล้ว +3

      🍼🍼 mommy. i'm thirsty

    • @mxmaverinho8115
      @mxmaverinho8115 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yeah, my idea as well. A pretty great reason to "protect democracy" on 1 side of the spectrum and "reunification" on the other.

    • @demogia4996
      @demogia4996 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@TimeTheory2099 What you think is too simple. The reason why Mainland China needs Taiwan is not semiconductors. If China needs Taiwan because of semiconductors, then China will try her best to stop TSMC from migrating to the United States, but the reality is that China has not done so. In addition, when semiconductors were not important, China already think Taiwan is part of China, and most countries in the world recognize it. Taiwan is part of China just like California and Texas are part of the US

  • @user-pk8rv6pc7o
    @user-pk8rv6pc7o 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    The last thing Chinese people lack is patience

  • @tx9ju
    @tx9ju 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    SMIC=ASML+TSMC

  • @rknoob9110
    @rknoob9110 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    现在来看还挺有趣的😂

  • @ScoobieDoo-zy1rh
    @ScoobieDoo-zy1rh 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Huawei mate 60 pro - am I a joke to you ? 😂