Einstein's Universe: Understand Theory of General Relativity

แชร์
ฝัง

ความคิดเห็น • 392

  • @GreatMindsLearnOffical
    @GreatMindsLearnOffical ปีที่แล้ว +16

    This video is a must-watch for anyone seeking a deeper understanding of the theory of general relativity.

  • @rickey5353
    @rickey5353 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    Saw this in '79. I watch it again, every two years or so. It helps me wrap my brain around his concepts when trying to explain his theories.

  • @calvinjackson8110
    @calvinjackson8110 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    There is something so incredibly GRAND about Peter Ustinov's voice. He narrated WINDS OF CHANGE so incredibly well.

  • @Awesomes007
    @Awesomes007 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    Wow, it’s really saddening to see all the angry, hateful and ignorant comments on this video. The scientific method of questioning authority and testing and observing and validating the truth has brought humanity so far. I really hope that many people can see the beauty of modern science and physics, without giving into their own trauma and fears.

    • @albin2232
      @albin2232 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      He must be captured.

    • @neighborlyfiend1484
      @neighborlyfiend1484 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's the new Republicans.
      No vax, no science, all religion dictators.

    • @newhailman
      @newhailman 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Stupid theory of relatively, I hate it 😡

    • @CliffSedge-nu5fv
      @CliffSedge-nu5fv 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Religion poisons everything.

    • @sergeantcrow
      @sergeantcrow 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well said... 😀

  • @geralddavison
    @geralddavison ปีที่แล้ว +16

    I am SO pleased to find this again after over 40 years!
    I watched this as a BBC Horizon programme in 1979 when I was 14/15 years old.
    It just fascinated me and gave me an interest for the rest of my life.

    • @AMITKUMAR-nf8in
      @AMITKUMAR-nf8in 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Your comment made it more amazing. Thanks for sharing your memories.

    • @hlpalacio
      @hlpalacio 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Este video tiene 40 años?
      Tiene que estar muy desactualizado, en 40 años hemos avanzado muchísimo pero lo voy a ver.

  • @jaycordova
    @jaycordova ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Best older documentary on Einstein and theories I've ever seen! How did I miss this as a young kid? I would have been utterly fascinated. And to think we've recently measured the gravity waves talked about here, wow! No science here needs revision; all still stands.

    • @owen7185
      @owen7185 ปีที่แล้ว

      💯💯💯💯💯

    • @ernestb.2377
      @ernestb.2377 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Nice documentary for sure. In contrary to some new video's here on TH-cam, that are rather very fast paced, these old skool scientists seems to take their time to explain, this rather complex subject. I am undergraduate in electronics engineering, so quite technical, but never have learned about these subject of physics. You can say I am a laymen, and am looking for a good book that explains these concepts in detail. If you can recommend some please do so. Maybe a modern one with latest insights. For me the most confusing is the concept of time. I have an idea that we accommodate the time to fit the other parts of the equation. Maybe time does not even exists really. Maybe there is only matter and space. We need time to explain the causality and events. The 4th dimension. One part in this documentary is especially confusing to me and seems contradictory. They state that the clock mechanism itself is not affected by gravity. And also that for the observer of the clock in the space no difference can be seen. But one minute later they explain how the clock that spend some time in space actually deviate from the one left on the Earth. Obviously the time go faster in the space compared to the Earth, but we do not grow old at that faster pace? And if the time advances in the space how come more time has passed on the Earth? All very confusing still... So you see I need some good quality lecture 🙂

  • @owen7185
    @owen7185 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I love this documentary, the best physicists are interviewed and Peter Ustinov the perfect host

  • @artdonovandesign
    @artdonovandesign ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Although this was produced a while back, it richly informs the viewer into each wondrous aspect of G.R. Easy to underdstand and without any over complicated descriptions. Famed British actor, Petet Ustinov reads from Einsteins notebook in a perfect "Hoch Deutch" accent- lending both credibility and genteel entertainment to the segments.😅
    Also, a wonderful appearance by science legend, Prof. John Wheeler- makes this a top notch production and a "Must See" for anyone interested in the subject

  • @samirsaha2163
    @samirsaha2163 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    One of THE best if not the absolute best TH-cam video on gravity I have ever enjoyed. My humble and very earthly thanks you to all the scientists and artists who labored enormously to create this masterpiece of cosmology. I will now take a toast to show my deepest respect to Einstein and to the heroes of this beautiful production.

    • @martin101harris5
      @martin101harris5 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is Peter Ustinoff a very famous English actor. He played Caesar before and many more....

  • @PurnamadaPurnamidam
    @PurnamadaPurnamidam ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Sir.Roger Penrose was so young back then. Nice to see him.

    • @Canard712
      @Canard712 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      As were we all much younger back then.

  • @seesaw777
    @seesaw777 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Einstein's first job out of college was that of a patent clerk at the Swiss Federal Office for Intellectual Property in Bern. Einstein later fondly remembered the patent office as the place where he "hatched his most beautiful ideas."

  • @ritemolawbks8012
    @ritemolawbks8012 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Anyone seriously learning General Relativity from a textbook or a TH-cam science channel has this line memorized @ 19:13.

    • @Kwisatz_HaderachXIII
      @Kwisatz_HaderachXIII ปีที่แล้ว

      I thought general relativity means you are related to a general. I guess I am wrong. I will google it.

    • @ritemolawbks8012
      @ritemolawbks8012 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Kwisatz_HaderachXIII That's exactly what _General_ relativity means. It's okay to be humble, but never feel guilty for always having the correct answers.
      I might go to hell for saying this, but _Special_ relativity means one of your relatives rides the short bus to school.

  • @michaelccopelandsr7120
    @michaelccopelandsr7120 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Time is fascinating. I worked the subway stations for nearly 10 years. From one end of the city to the other. Every so often I would notice the city would be saying that, "Today just flew by" or "The day was just dragging along." How can an entire city, with no interaction with each other until they used the subway, complain about the same time paradox unless it was effected by it? Maybe a time distorted bubble the earth passes through in its revolution around the sun. Maybe random waves of time distortion hitting the earth? Maybe they're given off by the sun. Maybe they're from outside our Terran system and reach us in intervals. ???? Ti-i-i-ime, is on my side. Yes, it is

    • @jrjr54321
      @jrjr54321 ปีที่แล้ว

      Or, confirmation bias and lack of rigorous measurement is a potent combination.

    • @michaelccopelandsr7120
      @michaelccopelandsr7120 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jrjr54321 If you can think of a better way to do a blind survey of an entire city, in the small window of opportunity, I'm all in. Until then, I invite you to spend a couple years in the subways, during rush hour and you'll see for yourself. Just listen as an entire city gets off of work and gets out of school. 2pm-9pm will cover the entire "window." You'll see it's more than a, "coincidence of circumstances."

    • @OldeDog_NewTricks
      @OldeDog_NewTricks ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hey man please add me to your “do not kill” list.
      My children thank you

  • @ITisandiamIT
    @ITisandiamIT 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I remember this from when I was a kid, and I still love it. This is one of the videos that launched my earlier yearning to learn more about Space, and the Quantum World. Kip Thorne finally proved gravity waves, and I enjoyed reading his earlier book: Black Holes and Time Warps. I really believe our Universe is much older then what many think. It is at least 36 billion light years old. We can determine that from the black holes, quasars and pulsars that formed during the early stages of our universe. I'll leave it at that, so I don't bore anyone. It could be much older. But, it is at least 36 bil. light years. When we finally grasp a real understanding of existence, we will laugh, at how simple the answer, truly is.

  • @AMITKUMAR-nf8in
    @AMITKUMAR-nf8in 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It is so fascinating to watch this masterpiece. amazed to witness the hard work went behind to create it.

  • @whirledpeas3477
    @whirledpeas3477 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Awesome, this is when you could understand Rodger Penrose's explanations

  • @satanofficial3902
    @satanofficial3902 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    "It is my scientific conjecture that those who are related to you are your relatives. And this is my theory of relativity."
    ---Albert Einstein

    • @satanofficial3902
      @satanofficial3902 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      "Do you feel lucky? Well, do you, punk? Go ahead, make my day and say something that can scientifically proven to be wrong!"
      ---Albert Einstein

    • @satanofficial3902
      @satanofficial3902 ปีที่แล้ว

      "Interacting energy fields of quantum mechanics representing the cosmological constant of scientific gobbledegook correspond to black holes when you tune the primary transwarp field coils with dangling participles. This is because a watched clock never boils when loose ships sink lips. The intrinsic curvature of the vacuum energy density is only the iceberg of the tip. Such evidence points toward a universal truth creating and managing subspace analyzers to annotate and categorize content directly related to the probability distribution of potato salad. At this point, nobody can deny the truth that it's based on a true story about an out-of-body experience. Sometimes, we fail to believe what we see, as it shocks our consciousness. I’ll speak more about that specific phenomenon in a moment. The hydrogen wave function shows in a clear and understandable way that there are asteroids around Uranus. Real science doesn't lie. Don't be deceived about accordions. Play an accordion, go to jail. That's the law. I know that's difficult for you to accept. It's called cognitive dissonance."
      ---Albert Einstein

    • @068LAICEPS
      @068LAICEPS 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂

    • @CliffSedge-nu5fv
      @CliffSedge-nu5fv 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, that's relativesity.

  • @Iyolo79
    @Iyolo79 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Love these old doco..thnx

  • @Molekuelorbital
    @Molekuelorbital ปีที่แล้ว +9

    It is fascinating to see such greats of physics and mathematics in this wonderful documentary, such as John Wheeler. Until today I only knew him from pictures (and of course from his work). To see him (and all the others) in motion for once and to hear their voices, I consider an extraordinary stroke of luck for me personally.
    And all this presented by the great Peter Ustinov. ❤❤❤🌞🌞🌞🍀🍀🍀🍀🌞🌞🌞🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

  • @trentbateman
    @trentbateman ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Things were a lot slower 45 years ago. But things were done with more care and intention and therefore likely to last longer

    • @CliffSedge-nu5fv
      @CliffSedge-nu5fv 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "That which grows slowly endures."

  • @Ruouiji
    @Ruouiji ปีที่แล้ว +5

    My favorite subjects...Einstein's Fear of Relatives, and The Periodic Table of Elephants! :)

  • @totalfreedom45
    @totalfreedom45 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    _Numerous anecdotes are being circulated concerning Einstein. He once told a girl secretary when she was bothered by inquisitive interviewers, who wanted to know what relativity really meant, to answer: “When you sit with a nice girl for two hours you think it’s only a minute, but when you sit on a hot stove for a minute you think it’s two hours. That’s relativity.”_ -The New York Times, March 1929 💕☮🌎🌌

    • @BestDoc
      @BestDoc  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @totalfreedom45 Thanks for sharing! 😉👍

    • @totalfreedom45
      @totalfreedom45 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@BestDoc This son of a gun was a ladies' man. 😂

  • @johnstuart2472
    @johnstuart2472 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I remember watching this as a child.

  • @sgringo
    @sgringo ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If I tuned in to this documentary in the middle and could only hear the audio, I probably would have thought it was being narrated/hosted by Christopher Hitchens.

  • @eric13th18
    @eric13th18 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Maybe it's weird, but it makes me a little sad that programmes aren't made like this anymore, presenters don't talk like this anymore. It's awesome to be able to watch it though, as I struggle to understand Einstein's theories.

  • @robertengland8769
    @robertengland8769 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I was born in the wrong century. I'd have liked talking physics with the great Albert Einstein. Only the greatest genius mind who ever lived.

    • @Kwisatz_HaderachXIII
      @Kwisatz_HaderachXIII ปีที่แล้ว

      If Albert wasn’t born then we wouldn’t have the discoveries we have today. If he was born now he would discover possibly the same things he discovered then or maybe not at all relative to his experiences in life and the circumstances in which he lived in. He came at the perfect time I believe. If you agree / disagree with me I would love to hear your perspective

    • @Kwisatz_HaderachXIII
      @Kwisatz_HaderachXIII ปีที่แล้ว

      I am sorry I misread your comment. You were saying you wish you were alive when Einstein was so you could see him and learn from him. I agree with you!! Me too!!

    • @sardernafismahadi2869
      @sardernafismahadi2869 ปีที่แล้ว

      Actually, no. Someone else would figure it out. And also no. There could be (or are) geniuses all around us. We just don't know about them. And Einstein is extremely overrated. This is my perspective/opinion. So, please. Don't get angry or sad about it.

    • @frankdimeglio8216
      @frankdimeglio8216 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@Kwisatz_HaderachXIII Einstein was a weasel. DiMeglio is the mastermind.

      Frank Martin DiMeglio
      2h
      Do objects fall at the SAME RATE for the same reason that planets orbit the Sun at distances that are irrespective of any given planet's "mass"?
      Yes. Here's the CLEAR mathematical proof.
      THE CLEAR AND BALANCED UNDERSTANDING OF PHYSICS/PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE AND TIME:
      Consider THE EYE. CLEARLY, WHAT IS E=MC2 is KEY to understanding WHAT IS GRAVITY (ON/IN BALANCE). Indeed, c squared CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE !!! Consider what is the fourth dimension. CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). A given PLANET (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal area in equal TIME. The ultimate mathematical unification AND UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience (AND TIME) combines, BALANCES, AND includes opposites. The rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution !!! Consider WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE !!! Consider WHAT IS E=MC2 ON BALANCE !!! It is KEY to understanding what is gravity (ON/IN BALANCE), AS the INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of thought (AND description) is improved in what is the truly superior mind. Consider, ON BALANCE, WHAT IS the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON !!! (It IS the SAME SIZE as what is THE EYE !!!!) INDEED, consider why and how it is (ON BALANCE) that there is something instead of nothing. Magnificent !!! It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense ON BALANCE. (BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.) Think. Great. Consider what is the man (AND THE EYE ON BALANCE) who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. WHAT IS GRAVITY is, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked !!! Great. Notice what is the orange (AND setting) Sun ON BALANCE. Notice WHAT IS the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE !!! Again, ON BALANCE, consider what is THE EYE !!!! CLEARLY, WHAT IS E=MC2 is KEY to understanding WHAT IS GRAVITY (ON/IN BALANCE). MAGNIFICENT. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!!!
      By Frank Martin DiMeglio
      WHAT IS GRAVITY IS, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent, AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. GREAT !!!
      WHAT IS GRAVITY IS, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. (WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent.) Consider what is the man (AND THE EYE ON BALANCE) who IS standing on WHAT IS THE EARTH/ground, AS touch AND feeling BLEND; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE !!! BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.
      WHAT IS GRAVITY IS, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent, AS “mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/AS what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY; AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE (ON BALANCE). INDEED, GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE !!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent !!! Accordingly, ON BALANCE, THE PLANETS (including what is THE EARTH) sweep out equal areas in equal times. Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE.
      WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma, AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). WHAT IS GRAVITY IS, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent !!!
      CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE.
      INDEED, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! GREAT !!!
      ACCORDINGLY, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. GREAT !!!
      WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent. GREAT !!!
      It is a very great truth that the SELF represents, FORMS, and experiences a COMPREHENSIVE approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience. INDEED, the INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT AND description is improved in the truly superior mind. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.
      By Frank Martin DiMeglio

    • @ritemolawbks8012
      @ritemolawbks8012 ปีที่แล้ว

      He was a very brilliant man with whom I would have loved to talk. It's all subjective and a matter of personal opinion, but it's still difficult imagining anyone coming anywhere close to the genius of Isaac Newton.
      I love the beauty, simplicity, and accuracy of Einstein's many contributions of classical physics and quantum physics. IMO, his biggest accomplishment was explaining why Newtonian mechanics and gravitation worked in spite of being incomplete.

  • @drfahedqureshi
    @drfahedqureshi 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This documentary is about Albert Einstein and his theory of relativity. The video starts with Nigel Calder, the writer, arriving at the McDonald Observatory to learn about Einstein's theory of relativity from a group of experts.
    John Wheeler, a physicist, introduces the concept of gravity. He demonstrates the concept by dropping a feather and a hammer on the moon, which fall at the same rate according to Einstein's theory.
    The video then explores the concept of curved spacetime. Einstein believed that gravity is not a force, but a curvature of spacetime caused by massive objects.
    The documentary talks about how Einstein's theory of relativity has been confirmed by astronomical observations, such as the deflection of light by gravity.The video also explores the cosmological implications of Einstein's theory, including the Big Bang and the possibility of a closed universe. Finally, the documentary discusses Einstein's legacy as a scientist and a humanitarian.

    • @CliffSedge-nu5fv
      @CliffSedge-nu5fv 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We don't need a ChatGPT summary.

  • @vazap8662
    @vazap8662 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Fantastic documentary! So good to see the perspective they had those days, pre ligo and eht and all the confirmations we've since had.
    I'm also pretty sure I saw this as a kid with my parents 🥰 The motorbikes, Ustinov, definitely rings a bell!

  • @Swat-ed5bt
    @Swat-ed5bt ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Ustinov is a legend ❤❤❤

  • @ernestb.2377
    @ernestb.2377 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Confusing part for me is the part at 50'26" where scientist explains that the clock itself is not affected (its mechanism) by it's position (on the Earth or in the space or even near a black hole), but later at 51'25" colleague scientists state that the clock that is taken from the Earth into a airplane or space for a while will have different reading once it has been back to Earth. How does this happen if the mechanism is not affected? Maybe I give myself the answer? Because the time really has a different pace once it is away from a gravity? Are there different kind of clocks tested? Mechanical, atomic and so on? ..

    • @Jasonfallen71
      @Jasonfallen71 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The clock is “slower” on an airplane or spacecraft as if it were in honey but nothing about the metal parts of the clock are changed or manipulated physically in any way.
      Spacetime itself changes when you go faster or slower. Seconds take longer, (or they pass faster) relative to observer watching from some other point in space like Earth’s surface.

    • @Jasonfallen71
      @Jasonfallen71 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And I forgot, it requires an atomic clock to test the theory. Other kinds can’t capture the very slight “slowing” of time.

  • @Killer_Kovacs
    @Killer_Kovacs 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It was just a few years ago that people were saying we would need an interferometer the size of a galaxy to measure gravitational waves.

  • @terrytwotoes3225
    @terrytwotoes3225 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I like it when people explain it to me like I'm 5

    • @eliseolopez6504
      @eliseolopez6504 ปีที่แล้ว

      Simplicity is understandable for all

  • @gerardopc1
    @gerardopc1 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Excelente documental, gracias 🫂

  • @owen7185
    @owen7185 ปีที่แล้ว

    The best relativity doco ever

  • @akshatpathrikar7080
    @akshatpathrikar7080 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    legendary documentary.

  • @twinflowerfioretta
    @twinflowerfioretta ปีที่แล้ว +5

    i like Sir Peter Ustinov, my Mother was a big fan of him, he was really a great Cesar🏆

    • @bestprice1776
      @bestprice1776 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@twinflowerfiorettahe was also the definition of pompous A$$

    • @Canard712
      @Canard712 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He always excelled at being the person most despised in a production. Yet he was nearly always a complex character.

  • @vansf3433
    @vansf3433 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Sun's rotational motion, the Earth's rotational motion, and all other celestial bodies' rotational motions are not cause by warped space which looks like a trampoline as how Einstein imagined, but it is the spatial relationships among them related to light and vacuum space, radiation and absorption of light

  • @aliservan7188
    @aliservan7188 ปีที่แล้ว

    Peter Ustinov!!! What a glorious documentary. Thank you so much for the upload

  • @jamesdavidfisher1192
    @jamesdavidfisher1192 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I watch documentaries such as this thinking eventually they'll start making sense to me...😳

    • @stewiesaidthat
      @stewiesaidthat ปีที่แล้ว

      Spacetime is an alternate universe created by Einstein in which to peddle his relativity theories. Its physics is based on acceleration, which allows for great science fiction.

  • @randyalbertsw1992
    @randyalbertsw1992 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That was Roger Penrose.

  • @marthafernandez9220
    @marthafernandez9220 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent Ladies and Gentlemen. Much appreciated!

  • @jameshotz1350
    @jameshotz1350 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    M=EC2 makes more sence since mass is made of Energy.

  • @screamallyouwant
    @screamallyouwant 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Well done! 😊

  • @gnome963
    @gnome963 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    First time I watched something about emcsq and understood much of what he meant. Also how the early physicists we're not as narcissistic as ours are today....the ones in this film actually used the word faith many times...

    • @imetr8r
      @imetr8r ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Scientist avoid using the word "faith" today because Christians confuse its scientific use with a belief in a god.

    • @gnome963
      @gnome963 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@imetr8r faith means no matter who read def. From dictionary. Faith, believing in the unseen. That's what gives christens a better more fulfilled life than those who have no faith....but I know you have faith in that everytime you flip the light switch you have faith in your electric company doing its job and that the light will turn on....faith

    • @frankdimeglio8216
      @frankdimeglio8216 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@imetr8r Einstein was a weasel. DiMeglio is the mastermind.

      Frank Martin DiMeglio
      2h
      Do objects fall at the SAME RATE for the same reason that planets orbit the Sun at distances that are irrespective of any given planet's "mass"?
      Yes. Here's the CLEAR mathematical proof.
      THE CLEAR AND BALANCED UNDERSTANDING OF PHYSICS/PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE AND TIME:
      Consider THE EYE. CLEARLY, WHAT IS E=MC2 is KEY to understanding WHAT IS GRAVITY (ON/IN BALANCE). Indeed, c squared CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE !!! Consider what is the fourth dimension. CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). A given PLANET (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal area in equal TIME. The ultimate mathematical unification AND UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience (AND TIME) combines, BALANCES, AND includes opposites. The rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution !!! Consider WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE !!! Consider WHAT IS E=MC2 ON BALANCE !!! It is KEY to understanding what is gravity (ON/IN BALANCE), AS the INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of thought (AND description) is improved in what is the truly superior mind. Consider, ON BALANCE, WHAT IS the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON !!! (It IS the SAME SIZE as what is THE EYE !!!!) INDEED, consider why and how it is (ON BALANCE) that there is something instead of nothing. Magnificent !!! It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense ON BALANCE. (BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.) Think. Great. Consider what is the man (AND THE EYE ON BALANCE) who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. WHAT IS GRAVITY is, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked !!! Great. Notice what is the orange (AND setting) Sun ON BALANCE. Notice WHAT IS the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE !!! Again, ON BALANCE, consider what is THE EYE !!!! CLEARLY, WHAT IS E=MC2 is KEY to understanding WHAT IS GRAVITY (ON/IN BALANCE). MAGNIFICENT. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!!!
      By Frank Martin DiMeglio
      WHAT IS GRAVITY IS, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent, AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. GREAT !!!
      WHAT IS GRAVITY IS, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. (WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent.) Consider what is the man (AND THE EYE ON BALANCE) who IS standing on WHAT IS THE EARTH/ground, AS touch AND feeling BLEND; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE !!! BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.
      WHAT IS GRAVITY IS, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent, AS “mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/AS what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY; AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE (ON BALANCE). INDEED, GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE !!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent !!! Accordingly, ON BALANCE, THE PLANETS (including what is THE EARTH) sweep out equal areas in equal times. Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE.
      WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma, AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). WHAT IS GRAVITY IS, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent !!!
      CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE.
      INDEED, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! GREAT !!!
      ACCORDINGLY, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. GREAT !!!
      WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent. GREAT !!!
      It is a very great truth that the SELF represents, FORMS, and experiences a COMPREHENSIVE approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience. INDEED, the INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT AND description is improved in the truly superior mind. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.
      By Frank Martin DiMeglio

  • @michaelccopelandsr7120
    @michaelccopelandsr7120 ปีที่แล้ว

    My idea so I get to name it! Voyager 1 is now in interstellar time or "Mikey's Time." "V-ger's" message has sped up now that it's outside our suns time bubble or, "Terran Time." It will be faster still when "V-ger" sends a message from beyond the Milky Way's time bubble. (That name is still up for grabs.) Then there's Outside the Local Group time bubble, so on and so on until we get to the, "True Interstellar Time Standard." Now that "V-ger" is in interstellar space, it's also in the Milky Way's STANDARD, faster moving, interstellar time or "Mikey's Time." This can be proven by turning off everything except its clock and transmitter. Have "V-ger" read time for as long as possible. They WILL show the flow of time speeds up the further away you get from any celestial bodies. Until you reach the Milky Way's time standard or "Mikey's Time."
    •Our sun's time bubble: "Terran Time" we know and have measured.
    •Milky Way's time bubble or "Mikey's Time." The rate/flow of TIME outside any influence but within the Milky Way: We just got there and are still figuring. Wild guess I'd say time will increase in speed, now and until V-ger is outside the Ort cloud .007-.07% faster, maybe. Just for reference.
    •Local Group's time bubble or the rate/flow of time outside of any influence but within the Local Group: Name still open and unknown. Wild guess .08% to a couple seconds faster, maybe. Used just for reference.
    •Outside any influence in the, "True Interstellar Time Standard," or...;-P Name NOT up for grabs BUT just begging to be measured. The rate/flow of time is fastest here. (Time flows fastest here so it's best to have your motor boat.) ;-P
    A minute is a minute in all. It's the rate/flow I'm talking about.
    The Milky Way's Interstellar Time Standard will be known as, "Mikey's Time."
    Pass it on, please and thank you

  • @jackwhitestripe7342
    @jackwhitestripe7342 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is NOT Einstein's spacetime curvature, this is a mechanical simulation device for Newton's gravity model.
    It is NOT General Relativity, it is Newton phyisics.

  • @questarc1978
    @questarc1978 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Absolutely enjoyed this video ,thank you,sending Love to each of You, 👊❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @josegregoriocontrerasvarga5693
    @josegregoriocontrerasvarga5693 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Einstein tuvo una idea genial, no lo dudo, pero el primero que tuvo la idea de considerar las propiedades de la materia como una onda, fue el físico francés De Broglie, quien propuso esta idea en su tesis de grado.

    • @laszlobizsok26
      @laszlobizsok26 ปีที่แล้ว

      ...marhaság az egész, a tudatlan butaság a négyzeten ...

  • @cine1972
    @cine1972 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Einstein est un Physicien allemand qui a refait 7 fois son Bac.

  • @jdavidrhea
    @jdavidrhea ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This Star Trek production value is on point.

  • @TheMysticGambler
    @TheMysticGambler 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    At 30 minutes into this it looks like where there's space, there's gravity. Period. Is that correct?

    • @CliffSedge-nu5fv
      @CliffSedge-nu5fv 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No. Gravity needs energy to occupy the space. Most space does have at least a little bit of energy though.

  • @longhuiyuan1132
    @longhuiyuan1132 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The best GR documentary !

  • @PrinceSarraf0314
    @PrinceSarraf0314 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The greatest physicist and his greatest theory 🎉🎉🎉😊😊

  • @DeH-v4r
    @DeH-v4r 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    การศึกษา หลักการวิชาการและวิชาชีพ ท.ทน เสน่งคงสำคัญหมาย ในกายมี นรชาติ ติวางวาย ความยุติธรรม กฎกติกาการปกครอง ของประเทศ ด้านสิทธิเสรีภาพ ระบอบการปกครอง ประเทศ ความมั่นคงและยั่งยืนของมวลมนุษยชาติพันธุ์และอารยธรรมแห่งศาสนา และวัฒนธรรมของมนุษย์ศาสตร์ ของระบอบการปกครอง เท่าเทียมและเสมอภาค ด้าน สิทธิเสรีภาพของ ประชาสังคมโลก ที่ยึดหลักความยุติธรรม สัจธรรม คุณธรรม คือมนุษย์

  • @desireenosbach5578
    @desireenosbach5578 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Schade dass der Film nicht deutsch synchronisiert wurde. Peter Ustinov sprach doch so ein angenehmes deutsch.

  • @cosmologyphysics2002
    @cosmologyphysics2002 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think Einstein should have said ' Matter tells space first how to bend and then only space can tell matter how to move.' I mean space depends on matter to be curved.

  • @2kull
    @2kull ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the Shovelhead Harleys doing the escort...I still own one.

  • @papsaebus8606
    @papsaebus8606 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is AMAZIMG

  • @АлександрКавун-я9д
    @АлександрКавун-я9д 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Представим, что корабль разгоняется до около световой скорости и все движения в нем замедляются для стороннего наблюдателя. Вопрос в том, как он вообще разогнался для стороннего наблюдателя, если все движения, чем больше он разгоняется замедляются? В нем двигатели встали с точки зрения наблюдателя. Это теория абсурда.

  • @rigapictures
    @rigapictures 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What observed by one now explain by entire world...every single thought every single mind matters no matter what they think...ideas has to be original

  • @rnenrick
    @rnenrick 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Many viewers compare this documentary to those made by professional production companies. Unfortunately, that includes its use of loud music. That unfortunate mistake, renders this video impossible to sleep to.

  • @CliffSedge-nu5fv
    @CliffSedge-nu5fv 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow, it's a baby Penrose! He looks like he's still in his 30s here, but he was born 1931. Hard to believe this was almost 50 years ago.

  • @DeH-v4r
    @DeH-v4r 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ทุกภลภาพ ทุกวรรณะ สถานะ ฐานะ ที่ตั้งฉาก วางระดับน้ำ คือมาตรฐาน ชั่งตวง วัด สิ่งที่เกิดขึ้น จากการกระทำ ต่อ สิทธิเสรีภาพเท่าเทียมและเสมอภาค คือ ระดับน้ำทะเล เที่ยงตรง 🕛📐📏🧲⛓️📜⚖️☯️✝️♾️✡️✡️☪️🌐🌗Ⓜ️🗺️ มีมูล moon เหตุและผล

  • @Rico-Suave_
    @Rico-Suave_ ปีที่แล้ว

    Watched all of it 1:56:07

  • @nrf82
    @nrf82 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Loved it

  • @cheesecop9321
    @cheesecop9321 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can you please explain how a D-student in Physics magically writes the most influential paper in physics history? Lots of gaps here.

    • @ValdiviaRicardo
      @ValdiviaRicardo ปีที่แล้ว

      Usted está absolutamente perdido, el tuvo las mejores notas en física y matemáticas, y tuvo malas notas en asignaturas más bien, aburridas

    • @stewiesaidthat
      @stewiesaidthat ปีที่แล้ว

      @ValdiviaRicardo Sean Carroll has an excellent podcast out on how this charlatan went running around the scientific community looking for someone to provide the math for his science based religion.
      Do some actual research. Some real experiments, and you will see Einstein for the fraud that he his.

    • @cosimo7770
      @cosimo7770 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Nonsense. Do your homework before making silly remarks.

    • @stewiesaidthat
      @stewiesaidthat ปีที่แล้ว

      @cosimo7770 did you not bother to listen to Sean Carroll's podcast on how Einstein was running around to all the mathematicians trying to find someone to provide the math for his fake religion?
      Do you honestly believe that the fountain of youth, the secret to immortality, is acceleration in space? The only reason he was influential is because of people with below average IQ like you who can't understand the difference between acceleration in space and acceleration in time.

    • @ValdiviaRicardo
      @ValdiviaRicardo ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cosimo7770 th-cam.com/video/2zwZsjlJ-G4/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=Tibees

  • @Joseph-fw6xx
    @Joseph-fw6xx ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is old Peter Ustinov died in 2004

  • @DeH-v4r
    @DeH-v4r 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    พลังงานที่ทรงพลัง นิวเคลียร์,ขีปนาวุธ ที่ยึดหลักโสดาบัน อารยธรรมแห่งศาสนาและวัฒนธรรมมวลมนุษยชาติพันธุ์ ด้านมนุษยธรรม ชาติพันธุ์ หลักธรรมาภิบาล

  • @shubhamkumar-nw1ui
    @shubhamkumar-nw1ui ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you gentlemen for uplifting the consciousness of human civilization.....❤

  • @frankdimeglio8216
    @frankdimeglio8216 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have FUNDAMENTALLY revolutionized physics.

  • @walter--
    @walter-- ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice how they predicted the gravitational waves ;-).

  • @patekswiss9521
    @patekswiss9521 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    John Wheeler. Wow.

  • @trytry2573
    @trytry2573 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The amazing thing about Einstein is that he created the theory of relativity all by himself.  On the other hand, the theory of quantum mechanics was created by many scholars.

  • @kaiserahmed2629
    @kaiserahmed2629 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love from Bangladesh

  • @blackbearbear9313
    @blackbearbear9313 ปีที่แล้ว

    Make things to bow up bigger way to go Einstein

  • @Awesomes007
    @Awesomes007 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interesting that they chose to show the starting of a new century in 2001 instead of 2000. I know that there are some different explanations and interpretations that I cannot remember about why someone might choose to do that.

    • @drew21t
      @drew21t 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There is no year zero that's why year 1 is the start of a new century or millennium. 0 is 10 not nil. So, if 1 is the beginning, then 9 or 99 or 999 is one year short of the turn.
      Think of it this way, if there was a year zero it would be describe as year one anyway.

  • @nachman5570
    @nachman5570 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Understand the theory of General Relativity😮

  • @phantomblindsight907
    @phantomblindsight907 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    then it makes sense to verify that light is a constant.

  • @marialuciamenegon5017
    @marialuciamenegon5017 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A teoria da relatividade geral é a massa da luz e a luz estática.

  • @dexter8705
    @dexter8705 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I really enjoyed learning why relativity is an illusion, thanks for that

    • @Music_Creativity_Science
      @Music_Creativity_Science ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Time dilation is real (a physical phenomenon), but not in the framework of Special relativity with observers moving in separate inertial frames without causes (accelerations) in the theory. In that sense Special relativity has an ingredience of magic, and the time dilation in the theory is only observational. Which means viewing each others clocks go slower with increasing distance, or faster with decreasing distance, without any physical effect. The equivalence principle connects the physical effects of the gravitational field with the non-gravitational acceleration, time dilation in a physical sense (atoms getting a slower rate of change) only occurs during:
      a) being stationary in a gravitational field
      b) accelerating as a result of the effect of a gravitational field
      c) any form of non-gravitational acceleration/deceleration/collision
      Never when just moving with a low or high constant speed very far from any gravitational field.

    • @dexter8705
      @dexter8705 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Music_Creativity_Science relativity is not real

  • @mrtlkl
    @mrtlkl 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    müthiş bir belgeseldi teşekkürler

  • @SurprisedDivingBoard-vu9rz
    @SurprisedDivingBoard-vu9rz 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Few things people are scared about the world. First job interview. Second higher education. Third marriage. Fourth what happens next. Fifth who decides what. They are based on the world averages.

  • @opiaetus1061
    @opiaetus1061 ปีที่แล้ว

    1% disparity with his measurement is relativity. Today we also have particle physics. We can get much more accurate numbers, for our own concerns. Which are more or less building infrastructure. Newton is not dead at all. Measurement based on experience is still important. Experience is absolute, it is what it is, what you felt you experienced, you did. Therefore, what you do, is absolutely quantifiable. How to put it as an example? When we build our civilization, we do it with ourselves in mind, with our range of motion more or less. How we see the world, has always guided us, because we build things that are accessories to us. Measurements based purely on mental events, can derive a world. But measurements based on experience, can derive my world. What I’m suggesting is our tools are precisely tuned~dampened. So that we can get the most fluid dynamics, out of those tools. Why is fluidity important? Because we face a wall. Only silent equipment can move the stars. Noisy equipment makes imprecision vanish, but when it does, we lose any sort of criteria for building the world.

  • @technics6215
    @technics6215 ปีที่แล้ว

    I thought that evidence of gravitational waves is pretty new. Looks like it is pretty old stuff... What did we discivered after all this presented in this documentary?

  • @PaloGodwin
    @PaloGodwin ปีที่แล้ว

    I always thought that the last words of Einstein were" Naw, I was just joking "
    Lol

  • @karamk92
    @karamk92 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Suppose two vehicles are chasing each other in vaccum. The leading vehicle is equipped with a rear view mirror. If the speed of the leading vehicle is 299,000,000m/s faster than the trailing vehicle and both are intially 300,000,000 meters apart. How much time will it take for light from the headbeams of the trailing vehicle to reflect off the mirror of the leading vehicle and reach the driver seated 1m behind the rearview mirror? How far ahead is the leading vehicle after 1.00067 seconds ?

  • @kailashsingh9737
    @kailashsingh9737 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice sir

  • @NaqibRahmatee-gy9cd
    @NaqibRahmatee-gy9cd ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good

  • @nguyenphuckhuat8259
    @nguyenphuckhuat8259 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nói vũ trụ của Ainstein quả ko hề sai, những cống hiến của ông đối với hiểu biết của nhân loại vẫn đang là sự tìm kiếm về quá khứ hiện tại và cả tương lai, thật tuyệt vời khi nhân loại có thể sản sinh ra một con người vĩ đại như vậy, cảm ơn ông rất nhiều Albert Ainstein

  • @twelfthhausjones6753
    @twelfthhausjones6753 ปีที่แล้ว

    Couldn't black holes just be denser versions of suns? If this were true that could mean that Black Holes move "faster" than the speed of light. The sun is powerful because its large gravity pulls mass toward it, & its intense energy frequency, i.e. heat, forces all incoming matter to warp & transform into other energy.
    If black holes follow the same principle, then it could mean that they are just suns with a denser center point, meaning that all matter moving toward it would be moving at a rate faster than we can conceptualize as "light."
    I'm certain the Earth's most central, densest point is colder than the matter around it, hence why the constant shifting of energy hasn't resulted in the explosion of the Earth.
    The Sun must have a dense central point that remains slightly colder than all the matter around it, which is why we're able to determine a stable point for the sun.
    Light is just energy. All light is energy. All energy is not (pure) light. Black holes could maintain a center of energy so fast that it is incomprehensible to the simple, animal human mind.

    • @deleuze369
      @deleuze369 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lol

  • @Kpt379
    @Kpt379 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The best man ever 👏😍

  • @b01tact10n
    @b01tact10n ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Only Einstein could comprehend the size of our whole universe along with how many galaxies, stars, and planets within😁

    • @ritemolawbks8012
      @ritemolawbks8012 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great compliment, but the vastness of the total universe was, and is, even greater than Einstein could have ever comprehended. In spite of that, the mathematics of _General_ relativity still accurately describes the _observable_ universe from shortly after the Big Bang to the present.

    • @calvinjackson8110
      @calvinjackson8110 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nice to compliment him like this, but the vastness of the universe is beyond all mortal comprehension, and that includes the great ( and he was) Albert Einstein.

    • @frankdimeglio8216
      @frankdimeglio8216 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@ritemolawbks8012 Einstein was a weasel. DiMeglio is the mastermind.

      Frank Martin DiMeglio
      2h
      Do objects fall at the SAME RATE for the same reason that planets orbit the Sun at distances that are irrespective of any given planet's "mass"?
      Yes. Here's the CLEAR mathematical proof.
      THE CLEAR AND BALANCED UNDERSTANDING OF PHYSICS/PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE AND TIME:
      Consider THE EYE. CLEARLY, WHAT IS E=MC2 is KEY to understanding WHAT IS GRAVITY (ON/IN BALANCE). Indeed, c squared CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE !!! Consider what is the fourth dimension. CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). A given PLANET (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal area in equal TIME. The ultimate mathematical unification AND UNDERSTANDING of physics/physical experience (AND TIME) combines, BALANCES, AND includes opposites. The rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution !!! Consider WHAT IS THE EYE ON BALANCE !!! Consider WHAT IS E=MC2 ON BALANCE !!! It is KEY to understanding what is gravity (ON/IN BALANCE), AS the INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of thought (AND description) is improved in what is the truly superior mind. Consider, ON BALANCE, WHAT IS the fully illuminated (AND setting/WHITE) MOON !!! (It IS the SAME SIZE as what is THE EYE !!!!) INDEED, consider why and how it is (ON BALANCE) that there is something instead of nothing. Magnificent !!! It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense ON BALANCE. (BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.) Think. Great. Consider what is the man (AND THE EYE ON BALANCE) who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. WHAT IS GRAVITY is, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked !!! Great. Notice what is the orange (AND setting) Sun ON BALANCE. Notice WHAT IS the TRANSLUCENT AND BLUE sky ON BALANCE !!! Again, ON BALANCE, consider what is THE EYE !!!! CLEARLY, WHAT IS E=MC2 is KEY to understanding WHAT IS GRAVITY (ON/IN BALANCE). MAGNIFICENT. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!!!
      By Frank Martin DiMeglio
      WHAT IS GRAVITY IS, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent, AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. GREAT !!!
      WHAT IS GRAVITY IS, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. (WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent.) Consider what is the man (AND THE EYE ON BALANCE) who IS standing on WHAT IS THE EARTH/ground, AS touch AND feeling BLEND; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE !!! BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.
      WHAT IS GRAVITY IS, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent, AS “mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/AS what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY; AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE (ON BALANCE). INDEED, GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE !!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent !!! Accordingly, ON BALANCE, THE PLANETS (including what is THE EARTH) sweep out equal areas in equal times. Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE.
      WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma, AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). WHAT IS GRAVITY IS, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent !!!
      CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE.
      INDEED, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! GREAT !!!
      ACCORDINGLY, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. GREAT !!!
      WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent. GREAT !!!
      It is a very great truth that the SELF represents, FORMS, and experiences a COMPREHENSIVE approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience. INDEED, the INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT AND description is improved in the truly superior mind. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.
      By Frank Martin DiMeglio

    • @خذهاكمعلومة
      @خذهاكمعلومة ปีที่แล้ว

      @@calvinjackson8110 even though , we still know so little

  • @voornaam3191
    @voornaam3191 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I t i s m o r e t h a n
    a b i t
    S L O W , I S
    I T ?

  • @mohammadsajadyazdanbakhshi7388
    @mohammadsajadyazdanbakhshi7388 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like it and it's good.

  • @Chefchen21
    @Chefchen21 ปีที่แล้ว

    hätte er es Proportionalitäts-Theorie genannt,wäre er weiter gekommen.Alles ist proportional zu einander.Golden Ratio. Der menschliche Körperbau ist proportional im Verhältniss 40/60,also golden Ratio.

  • @bmcv-k6x
    @bmcv-k6x ปีที่แล้ว

    宇宙は何でしょうか。人はなぜ生まれたのか。宇宙はなぜあるのか。また、言葉とは何。

  • @Timeplanets-ec7vf
    @Timeplanets-ec7vf 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Electricity, fascinated me,,there must be a magnetic power.great vid.

  • @brucechamberlin9666
    @brucechamberlin9666 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Peter needs more pens in his left shirt pocket.

  • @ВладимирБига
    @ВладимирБига ปีที่แล้ว

    В доказательство замедления времени при движении с околосветовой скоростью приводится опыт с наблюдением за прохождением света между зеркалами в движущейся ракете относительно наблюдателя на земле. Но этот опыт- симметричен . Никто не объяснял, каким образом эту симметрию нарушает факт ускорения, которое имела ракета. Но это легко понять, если применить аналогию света со звуком, а эфирное пространство - с воздухом. Представьте и подумайте...

  • @mintusaren895
    @mintusaren895 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Who said earth is round sun, here Einstein