Explore the role of technology in advancing international development goals in the Master of Science in Global Technology and Development. Create solutions by focusing on history, social science concepts, government policies and development projects from around the world. asuonline.asu.edu/online-degree-programs/graduate/master-science-global-technology-development/?ecd22=&
They were not ever proven to be tombs or temples! The valley of the kings is were the tombs are. The Egyptian's found them, that's why there's nothing about them being built. Someday the Egyptian government will figure out what's under their foundation & then we'll figure out what exactly they were built for.
When a question is like "why did this ancient civilization did this thing in such a weird way?", the answer is almost always "they didn't", and I love that :p
That’s wild to think that the Sahara used to be mostly swampland. The Earth ebbs and flows, changes all the time, but it’s a lot harder to remember that our lives are limited to such a small scale. I wonder if there’s like a simulated timelapse that visualizes the transformation, that would be really cool to see
During the time she is talking about when the Sahara was much wetter than now, it was still kind of dry but more like the American Midwest/Great Plains. In areas with large river systems, especially the Nile, there were large swampy areas. There are also traces of large completely dried up rivers and lakes in the interior Sahara as well. This process took many 1000s of years and of course if you go millions of years back, large parts were even the bottom of oceans.
@@TheDanEdwardsHey, be cool. It IS wild to think the Sahara was mostly swampland. Why the attitude? We're here to learn. I'm 70 and I get excited by a lot of things on SciShow.
@@rainydaylady6596 He's not even saying you can't get excited about learning he's just saying that particular piece of information is factually incorrect I would highly recommend AtlasPro's video on it (it used to be a Savanah but not a swampland)
I agree. I am not a native english speaker, and her narration is very easy to follow, very clear, perfect pace, not too fast, but lively enough to be really engaging.
Coming from the Midwest USA, we have half-moon shaped lakes scattered everywhere, remnants of previous river channels. Many are turned to stagnant swamps. Some are fully grown over and only satellite imagery or a geologist could tell "this spot" was an old river channel. Still, it was due to this that my first thought on "why seven miles from the river?" was "because the river moved?". Pretty close to correct, much to my amusement. Fascinating discovery and I look forward to what is found by tracing this ancient riverbed!
She said about '7 kilometers' which is in some crazy measuring system. In 'Merica, it's about 1 2/3 trip around the Talladega speedway or 3827 Bald Eagles.
Was it a branch of the Nile River, or was it a canal dug to divert the water to where they wanted it to go? In the 1800s, several canals like this were dug to feed water into the Miami-Erie Canal.
The pyramids are claimed to be just about everything.!. from sound generators to ancient batteries to compasses to astronomy charts.. burial chambers, impossible to build.. anything else?
0:54 it makes sense that Memphis would be a city in Egypt before being a city in Tennessee. I've been to TN to visit family, and you would be AMAZED how many towns there are named after other ones from across the world.
Absolutely wild and cool that we can still learn new things that fundamentally change how we think of the literal landscape of such a well known site all these centuries later
Okay, science is truly incredible sometimes. We sent satellites into space so we could shoot radar waves at the surface of the earth and analyze what the geography likely was thousands of years ago.
Reading some of the earliest comments on this video makes me really glad that I don't understand the appeal of hate watching. I genuinely don't understand why you would spend your time watching material that you despise just so that you can leave negative comments on it for people to argue with. (Let's be honest, no one actually believes that these negative comments are going to persuade anyone.) Especially because all that does is give more watch time, interaction, and ad revenue to the thing that you hate.
@@Cynadite Wouldn't be surprised, authoritarians regimes are poisoning relationships in other countries to weaken us. They really jump at anything mildly controversial to push extreme narratives so we don't react to their land grabs as we are too busy fighting each other.
@@BojackHorseman0098 do the bots on twitter who say earth is flat have a purpose? do the instagram bots who say everything is animal abuse have a purpose? no, they exist to make people rage and reply for engagement, it's dead internet theory.
I am surprised they didn't go looking for that branch of the Nile earlier. Knowing what we know about changing waterways this would have been my first hypothesis. I jumped to the conclusion before you started to list the clues that lead to the discovery.
Wow, a lot of these comments show a remarkable lack of understanding of how research communication works. Crapping on you citing your sources because it's not YOUR research? Because... NOT citing your sources would be better? 🙄
Right!?? Welcome to 2024... where (& when) one can discredit a lifetime of toiling, struggle, & phenomenal research with one grossly (yet, tragicomically) misused term: Anecdotal. 🤦🏻🤷🏻
In fact, while I was trying to avoid politics for a while, I can't help but feel like such idiocracy feels like a preview of USA presidential election results 😞
@@SinSefia One could make a strong case for that view having already transpired with the Reagan administration. That said, President Biff sure did take the baton well.
This is really fascinating stuff. I wonder if LIDAR mapping would show the depression of the old channel, and if we could use that technology to find similar extinct waterways in dry areas of Australia, Jordan, Argentina, etc..
@@AynenMakino exactly. It gets turned into urban sprawl, housing additions, industrial buildings. Those could all be placed on reclaimed city and previous industrial sites, but almost impossible to farm on those sites. I'm dearly hanging on to my piece of land, because they don't make land anymore. And people will always need to eat.
That was my thought! The lands nearest the river got that lovely mud that brought nutrients from the wetter parts of Africa to make their lands so productive.
They built it outside the range of inundation so that those plains could be used for farming. It doesn't surprise me that there was a branch of the Nile. Deltas have lots branching.
My first thought before I watched the video was, that maybe they found out somehow that on that spot the bedrock is closer to the surface, so they could build them there and ground would be able to take the weight of the pyramids. But then actually finding out about the river is so cool and clever, and as she pointed out, now the researchers can focus on a much narrower landscape around the former riverside, that could lead to many more discoveries...so damn cool!
The Giza Plateau is literally a 60ft (20m) tall hill of solid limestone... That _is_ why Kufu and Kafre's pyramid were built there... on the top of the hill... so the pyramids would appear even taller from the river.
Because I've seen the comment a couple of times already, for people who are saying, "I thought the question was how." I would like to point out that that is only a question within the conspiracy theorist communities. For the rest of us, with a halfway working understanding of archaeology, we know how the pyramids were built. A lot of manpower, multiple decades of work, and one of the most fundamental machines known to engineering, the inclined plane.
That's not entirely accurate either though, we assume that's how they were built because it's the most likely explanation but even inside archeology there are still debates about which construction method it was (big ramp, spiral ramp around/on it etc.), how long it actually took to build. Nothing against archeologists but they aren't experts in construction and I've seen people that are that said it's ridiculous to imagine they would've built that in just 20-30 years as some archeologists claim, especially with the limited tools tools they had (while it is possible to construct with those tools it would've taken extremely long). So sure it wasn't aliens etc. but it's still not all as certain and answered as some claim.
@@ZombieCartmanYT That's actually an outdated belief, we used to think they were built by slaves but further archeological evidence around the pyramids showed they were built by regular people that build villages nearby, had work contracts and were paid.
@@lp4514 We don't have definitive proof of how they were built or when they were built within a few thousand years, but you want me to believe that archeologists found proof of how the people lived when they were built. What was the average daily wage for a pyramid worker then? What was the currency? Since there is all of this evidence.
@@ZombieCartmanYTthere are records on pottery shards that have been found at the sites of the villages that have been now excavated. Hundreds/thousands of them. These records even state things like the days off workers received (to celebrate religious holidays). There are documentary television programmes available to watch that explain all this. Try Googleing Google is our friend ❤
A reminder, the Mississippi has been trying to shift it's course for nearly 100 years (which would ruin New Orleans and disrupt American shipping to a great extent) and a series of dams and canals along with frequent dredging makes it stay it's current course.
A huge part of why this started "only" 100 years ago is because the lesser branch used to be clogged and slow-flowing, despite its shorter distance (and thus steeper slope). It was the work of humans removing the debris from that branch that caused the problem to begin with.
It is crazy how far bodies of water can shift over time. Many ancient cities, for example, used to be ported on the coastlines of rivers or seas. Still, over time, silting and other geographic changes, both natural and artificial, led to the port cities becoming farther inland from the sea or the rivers alongside them, shifting course-all in the span of millennia or shorter by centuries.
I saw this thinking that it would be old news about the pyramid building as I often watch documentaries about Egypt and the surrounding area. But you managed to surprise me with something I haven't heard of, yet! Thank you. Even a 48 year old can find something fun in your videos 😀
OOP SciShow just left out critical information. A harbor (and a boat if I remember correctly) was found at the Sphinx temple leave little doubt there was water way there.
I mean, definably conclusive evidence of the waterway itself should leave _zero_ doubt there was a waterway there, dontcha think? A boat could have been brought there, and a harbor could have been a number of any other structures. A riverbed is a riverbed. Please explain how evidence of the actual thing and not evidence of evidence of the actual thing is less critical. What is even your point?
Science doe not know how it was built, archeology is a soft science when you get actual engineers involved they'll tell otherwise, science dismisses the fact that you can't cut granite with bronze in the time needed the building of a pyramid has never been illustrated or mentioned by the ancient Egyptians, they purely date it based off of graffiti that was found on the casing stones only nothing inside the pyramid ever had a mummy nor anything showing it was a tomb,There are blocks of granite cut with such precision it's a joke to claim it was made with bronze tools,there are drill holes and circular saw cuts into a lot of Egyptian megalithic works,now I'm gonna assume you don't care about actual facts and just want to troll out of ignorance which is understandable this is the Internet
But... but... why would aliens require a river there? I mean they just built a pyramid somewhere and flew it over there, right? Talk about overcomplicating things, duh! :D
The pyramids were not tombs. There is nothing to indicate that. No decorating. No Mummys. The granite box in the King's Chamber is not a Sarcophagus. Its the same thing as what is in the Serapeum, which itself is enigmatic.
@@filonin2 The source is common sense. Every tomb has inscriptions and at least had a mummy at one time. The are also intricately decorated. Nothing in the Pyramids. Pharaohs loved to see their name. They even put it on things they found to take credit for their creation. No names. Why would they leave the Grand Gallery open if the chambers were tombs ? They filled the other passages, why not that one ? They needed to have access. What about the Granite boxes. They aren't sarcophagi, they look nothing like them. The ones in the Serapeum, supposedly bull sarcophagi have no animal remains at all, but they do have plant residue. Back in the day, fledgling Egyptologists wanted to classify things, so the called them tombs; only because they couldn't figure out what else they could be. Again , absolutely nothing to indicate that. The idea stuck. As people defended their intellectual turf, it became enshrined.
The accepted theory is that the Giza pyramid was commissioned as Pharoah Khufu's burial temple. There are no indications of this inside of the Pyramid itself. The information comes from papyrus scrolls found and translated. Every other tomb has the name and many depictions of the Pharoah that was buried there, but not Giza.
The video should be called we solved A mystery of the Pyramids. The video literally ends with her saying we still have so much to learn about the pyramid.
Satellites have been such a boon to archaeology. Which kind of strikes my funny bone, even more than the boon airplanes gave. Space is so much further up, finding things we have to dig down to in order to actually see
#1: pyramids are too heavy to build on soft swampland #2: pyramids have no hieroglyphics inside (i.e. no prayers to the dead seen in the tombs of Egyptians), so they weren't "tombs" #3: Giza is a giant limestone quarry. Limestone is a great base for something heavy as well as one of the predominat building blocks of the pyramids #4: the Sphinx is the Egyptian hieroglyph for "entrance" and there are tunnels all under Giza
Due to all these comments talking about the British museum, im terrified of when the British invent shrinking technology. Nothing is safe at that point.
This question is asked time and time again by archaeologists. Rivers move around in the flood plain. A city in the middle of nowhere was on the bank of a river a thousand years ago
There were at least two boats (royal bardges) buried in the ground right next to the Great Pyramids. There's a boat dock at the end of the causeway, next to the Sphinx and associated Sphinx Temple.
You people just don't get it. Osiris came to the place and said "let there be pyramids here, for we shall party hard and keep refreshments inside", then he hit the ground with his magic stick and pyramids came out of the ground, there was no slaves or workers, people were too busy partying in those times.
Calculating the age of the 3 Pyramids of Giza - Astro-Geo-Dating method: No one actually knows, when they have been built. There are only indirect methods, to guesstimate. However, if for example in the future after us, if they would be rediscovered and us "cleaned up", but might leave things in there, others could think we have built them, right? I have been reading an article about the Pyramids of Giza, stating that they have found an explanation to the misalignment of 0.067 degrees counterclockwise, which they explained with inaccurate measurement method. I found this funny, as everything is so precise, that I thought I will check what else might have caused this. Thus asked the question: Okay, that the African Plate is moving towards Europe, but is it also turning meanwhile maybe? The answer is yes. Not much surprisingly it is turning counterclockwise. After quite some searching in studies, I have found the rotation speed. It is 0.927 degrees per 1 000 000 years. From this it can be calculated, that the Pyramids of Giza are about 72 276 years old. Not guesstimated, not indirectly suspected, but factually measured and calculated. So maybe we should ask astronomers to see, how did the Belt of the Orion stand 72k years ago. Maybe it can confirm the age by a different measurement. Homo Sapiens Sapiens, so exactly us, we are there since about 160k years ago, so having had a global civilization at about half of this time seems for me completely realistic. Feel free to check the calculations yourself and also to use the Astro-Geo-Dating method on any structure, where there is a misalignment. Wishing you and all constant and indestructible happiness beyond all imaginations!
@@Luritsas ? Both sides on the age debate eccept water erosion . And nobody's claiming there's a conspiracy to mislead. Buzzwords are never a good idea to use in an argument
Joe is in the vanished civilization camp after Graham turned him on. If you doubt the Ancient Alien Hypothesis, read the Book of Enoch. They didn't build the Pyramids, but they have stopped by from time to time to say hi
@@denisdenak What kind of answer are you looking for? Do you want me to detail every method discovered by researchers? Do you want a step by step description of how to build a pyramid from scratch? Do you want a summary of decades of research done by hundreds of individuals? Do you think this is a reasonable request? If you don't know something, find out what the experts are saying by doing some investigation.
@@drewharrison6433 He's asking you to respect his time, not make him spend the hours that we did learning about this stuff and to sum it up simply for him Here, I'll sum it up - ancient people were much better at trigonometry and manipulating physics with basic mechanical advantage than the average person is today
That's really cool! The map showing how already-discovered settlements and monuments follow the line of the ancient riverbed was interesting, and I hope this does lead to more discoveries.
It blew my mind to realize just how far south the Nile stretches- literally halfway down the continent. I wonder if it was around long enough that it played a significant role in hominid migration out of Sub-Saharan Africa.
But…we’ve known this for years that the water used to run right up to the pyramids. We also know that they weren’t ever shown to be tombs so I’m confused by this presentation… ?
Wow, so all those guys who's careers were ruined for suggesting the Nile flowed next to Giza in the past were right all along? I wonder if uh the people who ruined them will now forever be ridiculed. Mr. Hawas
Explore the role of technology in advancing international development goals in the Master of Science in Global Technology and Development. Create solutions by focusing on history, social science concepts, government policies and development projects from around the world.
asuonline.asu.edu/online-degree-programs/graduate/master-science-global-technology-development/?ecd22=&
Shame on SciShow for using a clickbait title
PLEASE PLEASE STOP MOVING YOUR HEAD AND HANDS SO MUCH. ITS OFF-PUUTING TO OTHERWISE A GOOD VIDEO.
Designs of the pyramids like a water pump
No.
They were not ever proven to be tombs or temples! The valley of the kings is were the tombs are. The Egyptian's found them, that's why there's nothing about them being built. Someday the Egyptian government will figure out what's under their foundation & then we'll figure out what exactly they were built for.
When a question is like "why did this ancient civilization did this thing in such a weird way?", the answer is almost always "they didn't", and I love that :p
Yeah the answer to this whole video is super simple, it's just: the river moved
@@alexrogers777 No the river didn't move it expanded. It literally "branched out".
@@mischarowe It contracted, actually. It converged into a smaller, more compact version with less branches. The opposite of branching out.
Wouldnt that still be consodered moving ? @mischarowe
@@baleywhite8311 Depends if you think branches of rivers are the same thing as the main river itself.
"Why are the pyramids in Egypt?" Silly SciShow. They're there because they're too big to move to th3 british museum ...
GOTTEM
Awesome answer 😂
Caesar: I came, I saw, I conquered
British explorers: I came, I saw, I took it home
You win. That was great.
But the French did it first.
That’s wild to think that the Sahara used to be mostly swampland. The Earth ebbs and flows, changes all the time, but it’s a lot harder to remember that our lives are limited to such a small scale. I wonder if there’s like a simulated timelapse that visualizes the transformation, that would be really cool to see
Yeah that would be awesome
"That’s wild to think that the Sahara used to be mostly swampland. "
During the time she is talking about when the Sahara was much wetter than now, it was still kind of dry but more like the American Midwest/Great Plains. In areas with large river systems, especially the Nile, there were large swampy areas. There are also traces of large completely dried up rivers and lakes in the interior Sahara as well. This process took many 1000s of years and of course if you go millions of years back, large parts were even the bottom of oceans.
@@TheDanEdwardsHey, be cool. It IS wild to think the Sahara was mostly swampland. Why the attitude? We're here to learn. I'm 70 and I get excited by a lot of things on SciShow.
@@rainydaylady6596 He's not even saying you can't get excited about learning he's just saying that particular piece of information is factually incorrect
I would highly recommend AtlasPro's video on it (it used to be a Savanah but not a swampland)
Figuring out there was a branch of the Nile there was genius! Love hearing about what geology can teach us.
This is the first episode I have seen hosted by Niba, and I think she did a great job - I really like her voice and narration style!
smooth voice and pacing and SUPER pretty. Yea, more Niba lol
I agree. I am not a native english speaker, and her narration is very easy to follow, very clear, perfect pace, not too fast, but lively enough to be really engaging.
Yes. Outstanding job. I came to the comments to make sure someone had said this!
Why are the pyramids in Egypt?
Because the British couldn't figure how to get them back to England
(I'll see myself out)
Good one.
Lol 😄
😅
This is probably true 😂
Oh, no ya don't... get your @$$ back in here!
We paid for a show!
🤣🤣🤣
Coming from the Midwest USA, we have half-moon shaped lakes scattered everywhere, remnants of previous river channels. Many are turned to stagnant swamps. Some are fully grown over and only satellite imagery or a geologist could tell "this spot" was an old river channel. Still, it was due to this that my first thought on "why seven miles from the river?" was "because the river moved?". Pretty close to correct, much to my amusement. Fascinating discovery and I look forward to what is found by tracing this ancient riverbed!
Yeah, those are called oxbow lakes. Great thought, you're completely right - meandering, curvy rivers often cut off whole sections like that
She said about '7 kilometers' which is in some crazy measuring system. In 'Merica, it's about 1 2/3 trip around the Talladega speedway or 3827 Bald Eagles.
@@jermafitzgerald2368 Ah, thank you for the term! I'm so overtired right now I"m lucky I could write coherent sentences.
@@entombedlamb5356 Hehe, oops, my paraphrasing skipped a measuring system, please pardon.
What other geological or environmental clues can help us understand the historical course of this ancient river?
Anything other than 'there used to be a river there' would have surprised me. But nice that it's confirmed.
Yea this was my take-away. The first half of the video really doesn't respect the intelligence or imagination of humans.
Right? Pretty sure this was already a well known fact and has been for some time
Was it a branch of the Nile River, or was it a canal dug to divert the water to where they wanted it to go?
In the 1800s, several canals like this were dug to feed water into the Miami-Erie Canal.
@@jeffputman3504 apparently the nile used to run alot closer to the pyramids and then canals were dug where needed.
the conspiracy theories on EVERYTHING pyramid related are INSANE and seeing it put so so simply and normally is so…relaxing and nice
The pyramids are claimed to be just about everything.!. from sound generators to ancient batteries to compasses to astronomy charts.. burial chambers, impossible to build.. anything else?
It’s also pretty bad to build next to a river due to flooding. So having decent spacing is a must
Well, they built them on an elevated plateau. So that should have taken care of that.
Tell that to thousands of civilizations that built near rivers.
flood plains are why Ancient Egypt existed at all
Those flood plains are called farm land. Would be very foolish to waste that space on structures you can't eat.
Bro, do you build the pyramids?
Excellent voice and camera presence. She should be in more videos.
She is in quite a lot of SciShow episodes. Each member has their specialties. Lots of good episodes including her :D
shes also soo pretty 😢
I love how each word gets its own nod or hand gesture or body wriggle. Just watching her is exhausting.
And then there's me who wants to do CENSORED CENSORED CENSORED
Ohhhh.... someone has a crush. 😊
0:54 it makes sense that Memphis would be a city in Egypt before being a city in Tennessee. I've been to TN to visit family, and you would be AMAZED how many towns there are named after other ones from across the world.
Absolutely wild and cool that we can still learn new things that fundamentally change how we think of the literal landscape of such a well known site all these centuries later
Okay, science is truly incredible sometimes. We sent satellites into space so we could shoot radar waves at the surface of the earth and analyze what the geography likely was thousands of years ago.
Reading some of the earliest comments on this video makes me really glad that I don't understand the appeal of hate watching. I genuinely don't understand why you would spend your time watching material that you despise just so that you can leave negative comments on it for people to argue with. (Let's be honest, no one actually believes that these negative comments are going to persuade anyone.) Especially because all that does is give more watch time, interaction, and ad revenue to the thing that you hate.
90% sure they're all bots anyway
@@Cynadite Wouldn't be surprised, authoritarians regimes are poisoning relationships in other countries to weaken us. They really jump at anything mildly controversial to push extreme narratives so we don't react to their land grabs as we are too busy fighting each other.
@@Cynadite bots for what, to sell more gram Hancock books? I think these are mostly just lonely
@@BojackHorseman0098 do the bots on twitter who say earth is flat have a purpose? do the instagram bots who say everything is animal abuse have a purpose? no, they exist to make people rage and reply for engagement, it's dead internet theory.
What kind of comments were they?
Niba is quickly becoming one of my favourite SciShow hosts. Informative, fun, and enthusiastic. Great video!
I am surprised they didn't go looking for that branch of the Nile earlier. Knowing what we know about changing waterways this would have been my first hypothesis. I jumped to the conclusion before you started to list the clues that lead to the discovery.
Wow, a lot of these comments show a remarkable lack of understanding of how research communication works. Crapping on you citing your sources because it's not YOUR research? Because... NOT citing your sources would be better? 🙄
Right!?? Welcome to 2024... where (& when) one can discredit a lifetime of toiling, struggle, & phenomenal research with one grossly (yet, tragicomically) misused term:
Anecdotal.
🤦🏻🤷🏻
In fact, while I was trying to avoid politics for a while, I can't help but feel like such idiocracy feels like a preview of USA presidential election results 😞
@@SinSefia One could make a strong case for that view having already transpired with the Reagan administration. That said, President Biff sure did take the baton well.
It has always been this way, it just the internet gave people's ignorance a megaphone and display case.
Trust me bro
Last time I was this early sci show didn't run mid-roll ads
Get rekt. No ads for me. Sucks to suck.
@@Bluebloods7 wow you're so cool you totally PWND him bro
what are ads?
@@Bluebloods7 roflcopter
@@LizordSword put that beta in her place
This is really fascinating stuff. I wonder if LIDAR mapping would show the depression of the old channel, and if we could use that technology to find similar extinct waterways in dry areas of Australia, Jordan, Argentina, etc..
That would be really neat! It would be really cool if we could track such geological changes over centuries or even millennia!
That would be awesome. LIDAR show how huge the Mayan civilization actually was. There is so much more to discover. Exciting times to be in science!
I imagine they also wouldn't want to give up a significant stretch of precious farmland to turn into a giant construction site.
@Doug Ford
Unlike American construction which gobbles up rich farmland to build on😢
@@hoosierpioneer It does? That's gonna be a big problem in the next decade. Food production globally is projected to reduce by half.
@@AynenMakino exactly. It gets turned into urban sprawl, housing additions, industrial buildings. Those could all be placed on reclaimed city and previous industrial sites, but almost impossible to farm on those sites. I'm dearly hanging on to my piece of land, because they don't make land anymore. And people will always need to eat.
That was my thought! The lands nearest the river got that lovely mud that brought nutrients from the wetter parts of Africa to make their lands so productive.
Love these insights! Great job Niba.
They built it outside the range of inundation so that those plains could be used for farming. It doesn't surprise me that there was a branch of the Nile. Deltas have lots branching.
Great topic & video! This needs to be required before the 1st day of class each year for ever.
My first thought before I watched the video was, that maybe they found out somehow that on that spot the bedrock is closer to the surface, so they could build them there and ground would be able to take the weight of the pyramids.
But then actually finding out about the river is so cool and clever, and as she pointed out, now the researchers can focus on a much narrower landscape around the former riverside, that could lead to many more discoveries...so damn cool!
The Giza Plateau is literally a 60ft (20m) tall hill of solid limestone... That _is_ why Kufu and Kafre's pyramid were built there... on the top of the hill... so the pyramids would appear even taller from the river.
That solid bedrock is the reason that EXACT spot along the river branch was chosen.
Very interesting...
I imagine this also settles more than a few questions on how they were built, right?
Because I've seen the comment a couple of times already, for people who are saying, "I thought the question was how." I would like to point out that that is only a question within the conspiracy theorist communities.
For the rest of us, with a halfway working understanding of archaeology, we know how the pyramids were built. A lot of manpower, multiple decades of work, and one of the most fundamental machines known to engineering, the inclined plane.
Slavery is how. Soon the loons will want to tear them down because they are the “ultimate monuments to slavery”.
That's not entirely accurate either though, we assume that's how they were built because it's the most likely explanation but even inside archeology there are still debates about which construction method it was (big ramp, spiral ramp around/on it etc.), how long it actually took to build. Nothing against archeologists but they aren't experts in construction and I've seen people that are that said it's ridiculous to imagine they would've built that in just 20-30 years as some archeologists claim, especially with the limited tools tools they had (while it is possible to construct with those tools it would've taken extremely long).
So sure it wasn't aliens etc. but it's still not all as certain and answered as some claim.
@@ZombieCartmanYT That's actually an outdated belief, we used to think they were built by slaves but further archeological evidence around the pyramids showed they were built by regular people that build villages nearby, had work contracts and were paid.
@@lp4514 We don't have definitive proof of how they were built or when they were built within a few thousand years, but you want me to believe that archeologists found proof of how the people lived when they were built. What was the average daily wage for a pyramid worker then? What was the currency? Since there is all of this evidence.
@@ZombieCartmanYTthere are records on pottery shards that have been found at the sites of the villages that have been now excavated.
Hundreds/thousands of them.
These records even state things like the days off workers received (to celebrate religious holidays).
There are documentary television programmes available to watch that explain all this.
Try Googleing
Google is our friend ❤
A reminder, the Mississippi has been trying to shift it's course for nearly 100 years (which would ruin New Orleans and disrupt American shipping to a great extent) and a series of dams and canals along with frequent dredging makes it stay it's current course.
A huge part of why this started "only" 100 years ago is because the lesser branch used to be clogged and slow-flowing, despite its shorter distance (and thus steeper slope). It was the work of humans removing the debris from that branch that caused the problem to begin with.
So funny that a human with a brain can think that the Mississippi only started meandering 100 years ago
Crazy how people were called pseudo scientists and conspiracy theorists for saying there used to be running water near giza.
It is crazy how far bodies of water can shift over time. Many ancient cities, for example, used to be ported on the coastlines of rivers or seas. Still, over time, silting and other geographic changes, both natural and artificial, led to the port cities becoming farther inland from the sea or the rivers alongside them, shifting course-all in the span of millennia or shorter by centuries.
Awesome video!!
I saw this thinking that it would be old news about the pyramid building as I often watch documentaries about Egypt and the surrounding area. But you managed to surprise me with something I haven't heard of, yet! Thank you. Even a 48 year old can find something fun in your videos 😀
Sounds great, really Like the small Musical pieces in your Videos, would Love to See more
OOP SciShow just left out critical information. A harbor (and a boat if I remember correctly) was found at the Sphinx temple leave little doubt there was water way there.
a six minute video didn’t include everything????
I mean, definably conclusive evidence of the waterway itself should leave _zero_ doubt there was a waterway there, dontcha think? A boat could have been brought there, and a harbor could have been a number of any other structures. A riverbed is a riverbed. Please explain how evidence of the actual thing and not evidence of evidence of the actual thing is less critical. What is even your point?
Could explain the potential water erosion on the sphinx? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sphinx_water_erosion_hypothesis
@@ZackWolf As far as I know, that hypothesis is not considered likely
As someone studying hieratic this is super cool to know about!
Science: We know how the pyramids were built.
Ancient Aliens: But what of it was space monsters?
Nobody honestly says we know how. We have hypotheses that are incomplete have not been fully examined.
Science doe not know how it was built, archeology is a soft science when you get actual engineers involved they'll tell otherwise, science dismisses the fact that you can't cut granite with bronze in the time needed the building of a pyramid has never been illustrated or mentioned by the ancient Egyptians, they purely date it based off of graffiti that was found on the casing stones only nothing inside the pyramid ever had a mummy nor anything showing it was a tomb,There are blocks of granite cut with such precision it's a joke to claim it was made with bronze tools,there are drill holes and circular saw cuts into a lot of Egyptian megalithic works,now I'm gonna assume you don't care about actual facts and just want to troll out of ignorance which is understandable this is the Internet
@@abj136 They have not been examined by you. Science has been examining them for centuries.
We know so much, yet we clearly have (literally) barely scraped the surface, kudos to those who discovered this
As an OpenStreetMap geek, I appreciate the proper credit!
Thank you Niba.
But... but... why would aliens require a river there? I mean they just built a pyramid somewhere and flew it over there, right? Talk about overcomplicating things, duh! :D
Aliens just love dumping water on Earth. It’s a fact. They have no use for it.
Does your brain actually function?
Those aren't the aliens silly! They were the giants! They needed the river so they can shower properly!
There are no aliens because the Space doesn't exist because the Earth is flat. Simple. The pyramids are docks for building the Ark.
This is a really cool finding and rather exciting!
As an Egyptian who grew up not too far from the Giza pyramids, the only mystery is how our ancestors built magnificent wonders and now ugghhhh
I've often thought the same about the accomplishments of the ancient Romans and the Greeks.
This was very interesting thanks 😊
With knowledge of a new river tributary, does this re-contextualize any texts which discuss sacred or holy waters?
Interesting, thank you.
Yea the Nile moved we have known this. They did lidar ten years ago if i remember right
Learn something new every day, Awesome!🙂
The pyramids were not tombs. There is nothing to indicate that. No decorating. No Mummys. The granite box in the King's Chamber is not a Sarcophagus. Its the same thing as what is in the Serapeum, which itself is enigmatic.
Source- Trust me bro
@@filonin2 The source is common sense. Every tomb has inscriptions and at least had a mummy at one time. The are also intricately decorated. Nothing in the Pyramids. Pharaohs loved to see their name. They even put it on things they found to take credit for their creation. No names. Why would they leave the Grand Gallery open if the chambers were tombs ? They filled the other passages, why not that one ? They needed to have access. What about the Granite boxes. They aren't sarcophagi, they look nothing like them. The ones in the Serapeum, supposedly bull sarcophagi have no animal remains at all, but they do have plant residue. Back in the day, fledgling Egyptologists wanted to classify things, so the called them tombs; only because they couldn't figure out what else they could be. Again , absolutely nothing to indicate that. The idea stuck. As people defended their intellectual turf, it became enshrined.
@@filonin2you don’t need a source if you’re not making a claim. Those that say they are tombs ARE making a claim without any evidence to support it
The accepted theory is that the Giza pyramid was commissioned as Pharoah Khufu's burial temple. There are no indications of this inside of the Pyramid itself. The information comes from papyrus scrolls found and translated. Every other tomb has the name and many depictions of the Pharoah that was buried there, but not Giza.
Thanks again
Pretty freaking cool!
About time!
Why don’t they just ask Steve Martin?😂
Hi Niba!
The video should be called we solved A mystery of the Pyramids. The video literally ends with her saying we still have so much to learn about the pyramid.
we can’t talk about that 🤫
Satellites have been such a boon to archaeology. Which kind of strikes my funny bone, even more than the boon airplanes gave. Space is so much further up, finding things we have to dig down to in order to actually see
Hell of an ambitious title given the sheer number of mysteries about the pyramids
They like to say the pyramids were tombs but from what I recall no mummy or corpse of any kind has ever been found in the Giza pyramids.
#1: pyramids are too heavy to build on soft swampland
#2: pyramids have no hieroglyphics inside (i.e. no prayers to the dead seen in the tombs of Egyptians), so they weren't "tombs"
#3: Giza is a giant limestone quarry. Limestone is a great base for something heavy as well as one of the predominat building blocks of the pyramids
#4: the Sphinx is the Egyptian hieroglyph for "entrance" and there are tunnels all under Giza
Due to all these comments talking about the British museum, im terrified of when the British invent shrinking technology. Nothing is safe at that point.
Is this a rework of an older video? Cause I swear I've watched a SciShow video saying this exact thing before 😅
Who knows what other secrets are buried? Mum-ra, that's what's buried out there!
Aliens!
Wow! So cool.
This question is asked time and time again by archaeologists. Rivers move around in the flood plain. A city in the middle of nowhere was on the bank of a river a thousand years ago
There were at least two boats (royal bardges) buried in the ground right next to the Great Pyramids. There's a boat dock at the end of the causeway, next to the Sphinx and associated Sphinx Temple.
The Nile floods…you don’t want to be digging large amounts of mud from around your pyramid…
bold title
Every time I see the astronaut in the water shirt out of the corner of my eye, zoned out etc. I think it's Finn the human 😊
You people just don't get it. Osiris came to the place and said "let there be pyramids here, for we shall party hard and keep refreshments inside", then he hit the ground with his magic stick and pyramids came out of the ground, there was no slaves or workers, people were too busy partying in those times.
Neat.
Hmmmm I don't want to be that guy buttt I don't buy the copper tools😂😂
Love your outfit!
Calculating the age of the 3 Pyramids of Giza - Astro-Geo-Dating method:
No one actually knows, when they have been built. There are only indirect methods, to guesstimate. However, if for example in the future after us, if they would be rediscovered and us "cleaned up", but might leave things in there, others could think we have built them, right?
I have been reading an article about the Pyramids of Giza, stating that they have found an explanation to the misalignment of 0.067 degrees counterclockwise, which they explained with inaccurate measurement method. I found this funny, as everything is so precise, that I thought I will check what else might have caused this. Thus asked the question: Okay, that the African Plate is moving towards Europe, but is it also turning meanwhile maybe?
The answer is yes. Not much surprisingly it is turning counterclockwise. After quite some searching in studies, I have found the rotation speed. It is 0.927 degrees per 1 000 000 years.
From this it can be calculated, that the Pyramids of Giza are about 72 276 years old. Not guesstimated, not indirectly suspected, but factually measured and calculated.
So maybe we should ask astronomers to see, how did the Belt of the Orion stand 72k years ago. Maybe it can confirm the age by a different measurement.
Homo Sapiens Sapiens, so exactly us, we are there since about 160k years ago, so having had a global civilization at about half of this time seems for me completely realistic.
Feel free to check the calculations yourself and also to use the Astro-Geo-Dating method on any structure, where there is a misalignment.
Wishing you and all constant and indestructible happiness beyond all imaginations!
an interesting idea about the placement of the pyramids posits that they re-create the belt of orion, with the nile being the milky way
So easy to see those patterns when we really want to huh
the sphinx also has signs of water erosion
Hence the debate about its age
no it doesn't, almost no expert accepts that nonsense. That's for the conspiracy lovers.
@@Luritsas ? Both sides on the age debate eccept water erosion . And nobody's claiming there's a conspiracy to mislead. Buzzwords are never a good idea to use in an argument
@@Luritsas Robert Schoch has a phd in geology. And many other doctored geologists agree.
@@terryenglish7132 you missed the almost part
This has been known for a long time.
Joe Rogan fans are still pretty sure it was aliens
Joe is in the vanished civilization camp after Graham turned him on. If you doubt the Ancient Alien Hypothesis, read the Book of Enoch. They didn't build the Pyramids, but they have stopped by from time to time to say hi
No
Did not expect this this morning,
I want to know what happens if we bring the Arahmat back to life and let it flow again ??
...then you have an extra smaller river next to the Nile.
She is my new favorite host
I thought the “mystery of the pyramids” was how they were built, not where they are located???
If you haven’t seen the Giza Pyramids live, what are you waiting for?
0:52 someone left in Memphis as a city???
Eh yes? Memphis is a city in Egypt that used to be the capital of Lower Egypt, it's also called Mennefer, which is what is said in the video.
In achreology, the answer is always water.
Some of these comments bring the median average of human race's intellect by couple of numbers.
Up or down? 😉
I like your voice, very smooth on the ears.
I thought the question was how they built it, not why they built it (there)?
That was a question before experimental archeologists and excavations told us pretty much exactly how they were built.
@@drewharrison6433lmao enlighten us
Shame on SciShow for using a clickbait title
@@denisdenak What kind of answer are you looking for? Do you want me to detail every method discovered by researchers? Do you want a step by step description of how to build a pyramid from scratch? Do you want a summary of decades of research done by hundreds of individuals? Do you think this is a reasonable request? If you don't know something, find out what the experts are saying by doing some investigation.
@@drewharrison6433 He's asking you to respect his time, not make him spend the hours that we did learning about this stuff and to sum it up simply for him
Here, I'll sum it up - ancient people were much better at trigonometry and manipulating physics with basic mechanical advantage than the average person is today
Well I guess "Location, location, location" wasn't right.
Pretty sure this was already known? Why are u guys acting like this is news
The idea it's tombs is such cap 🤦♂️
If you don't like the show, don't watch it. I like it, so I do watch it. Yall need to touch grass my goodness.
Very interesting:)
That's really cool! The map showing how already-discovered settlements and monuments follow the line of the ancient riverbed was interesting, and I hope this does lead to more discoveries.
It blew my mind to realize just how far south the Nile stretches- literally halfway down the continent. I wonder if it was around long enough that it played a significant role in hominid migration out of Sub-Saharan Africa.
Shame on SciShow for using a clickbait title
We solved "a" mystery of the pyramids
Not really that click baity....
But…we’ve known this for years that the water used to run right up to the pyramids. We also know that they weren’t ever shown to be tombs so I’m confused by this presentation… ?
Like her voice but the accordion hands are distracting.
Well, I have learn something.
Thank Heavens. I'm so relieved. Now I can sleep at night.
Wow, so all those guys who's careers were ruined for suggesting the Nile flowed next to Giza in the past were right all along? I wonder if uh the people who ruined them will now forever be ridiculed. Mr. Hawas