I absolutely love reading all of these lousy comments about who's country is bigger and better. lol Nobody wins a nuclear war. All sides lose hundreds of millions of people. All sides are thrown back to the stone ages, and there want be any law and order for decades to come. I wish you all lady like luck in your debates.
John Shackleton USA do have anti-ballistic air defense in Europe that can stop most of those missiles before coming to USA ... i mean if Russia did bombed USA and Europe. some states "middle and southern" in USA and UK and maybe Spain will survived ... but Russia and Europe will get exterminated. why do you think Russia trying to take over Ukraine ?? they are trying to have more space to secure their defenses against USA and Europe.
John Shackleton This just ranks the missiles capable of carrying the biggest bomb highest, and since the Russians didn't have the same level of missile accuracy as the US so they developed larger warheads to compensate. The most deadly system is Trident which can carry upto 14 warheads on a single missile. Globalization is what's keeping nations like China and the US at bay.
Uprising-Pulse Russia still has enough ICBM`s-/SLBM`s to saturate any defense capability. They have also a lot of SRBM`s to attack the ABM launch sites in europe A nuclear war between Russia and the NATO will bring awesome destruction to all of us, europe, russia and the USA
Kevin Maguire the most deadly system is still the RS-20(SS-18) with a payload of 8800kg, more than 3 times the payload of the Trident2 D5 (2800kg). The RS-20 is capable to carry up to 24MIRV with 500kt each, but not realized because of START(RS20a2) Actually it carries 10 warheads between 800kt and 1Mt each Trident 2 D5 carries up to 8 W88 (8x475kt) (also because of START)
+Juuso Peltoniemi 7 years 22rgt B Squadron Special Air Service says I know my bit about weapons, the comment I made references the sheer weight of such a missile and the speed it could attain..
A few things that you can be assured of after watching this is: 1) all of these have already been outclassed by more advanced and efficient missiles 2) even at the time of this video, there are other missiles equally as deadly or more that hadn't been disclosed 3) in all honesty, the assumption that any one of these are leaps better than any other missile on the list is really kind of pointless. As long as the missile has a decent range and speed and as long as it can carry a nuclear war head, it's going to be absurdly destructive so why even compare them? When comparing the nations who have the means to wage nuclear war, the only points worth discussing are the amount of war heads owned, the means they have to deploy them, and the distance in which the war heads can travel, and the strength of their missile defense at home. It would be pointless to discuss the destructive power of the missiles you own if you don't have an efficient way to deploy them and also it would be futile to engage in a nuclear war if your home front cannot properly defend itself from a nuclear war head barrage on your front door. So basically, the nation with the best bombers, nuclear submarines, naval destroyers, and missile defense would be top dog I would think in everyone's mind. That being said, Russia and the United States stand as the most powerful nations on the planet, and to be honest it's not something to be proud of.
Maybe this rating is true about strongth of warhead, but more advanced smaller missiles more deadly. Bulava as example much more survivable at all stages of flight, equipped with huge pack of fake targets, maneurable warheads, etc.
4 ปีที่แล้ว +2
Just imagine if even 1/4 of that money spent on missiles was spent towards medicine or food for children....
+TRUTH SPREADER unfortunately, that is exactly true. But what really invites conflicts and war is the weakness. If we are weak, we are inviting trouble. Thats how this world is right now. So, this show of strength is to ensure no one messes with us.
F DON'T FOOL YOURSELVES THAT WE'VE.LIVE. BECAUSE 50 YEARS GOES BY VERY QUICKLY AND BY 50 MOST PEOPLE ARE SICK DIEING IN CHRONIC AGONISING PAIN AND THE FIRST 10 YEARS DON'T EVEN COUNT BECAUSE YOU. HAVEN'T EVEN LIVED AND 40 PERCENT OF LIFE WERE ASLEEP
The Russians and the Chinese have a number of different ICBM's on this list..... I'm thinking the U.S. needs to re-deploy the LGM-118A Peacekeeper missile.... It's more modern than the LGM-30 Minuteman III system.....and had better MIRV capability If it were in service, I wonder where it would have made it on this list?
I clearly remember that October day in 1990 when Curtis Lemay passed away. I was working directly under a retired Colonel who had retired after 36 years in the Air Force in about 1980. We were both with the DoD, (stationed at the same Aerospace Facility). I was just a "pup" with 11 years in. I walked into the Colonel's office and paid my respects. He had worked closely with Lemay for a bit in the late 1950's and 1960's. We both knew that Lemay had on 3 or 4 occasions called for the USA to launch a "First Strike" against the Soviet Union. Few men, even that high in the military establishment, had ever pushed his views on the POTUSA to actually do "it". Lemay was a national hero, but was also one of the few men on Earth that almost extinguished civilization. Mixed feelings at his loss to say the least...
No mixed feelings here. Lemay was a sociopath who used the military for “cover.” Not only Russia but he wanted to nuke China too. It would have only been a matter of time before they hit us back the same.
The TEL based ICBMs and the SLBMs are far more deadly than silo based ICBMs. A submarine carrying say a Trident 2 missile can close to minimum launch range drastically reducing reaction time. Both submarine and TEL based ICBMs are mobile and pretty much impossible to eliminate in a preemptive strike.
PROUD TO BE AN INDIAN NATIONALIST.. Горд быть индийского национального .. 自豪的是印度的民族主义.. BİR HİNT MİLLİYETÇİ OLMAK GURUR .. Fier d'être un nationaliste indien STOLZ, EIN INDISCHES Nationalist zu sein ..
Ok. After this video I know that the " YARS" is a Chinese rocket. :)))))) I hope you laugh as well as I. In the world it is usually to take into service a foreign nuclear weapons :))))))))))))))))) Strange though that the Chinese testing it in Siberia (as pictured) and abbreviation missiles (RS) is not typical for Chinese missiles
+Ground Zero You have another little mistake. Layner correct code is not R29-RMU2, but R29-RMU2.1. Layner (in service since 2014) is a modification of R29-RMU2, called Sineva (in service since 2007). So R29-RMU2 = "SINEVA" and "LAYNER" = R29-RMU2.1
And if we, the world, would spend 1/3 of the money, time, knowledge we spend on these missiles on a cure and prevention for cancer, infectious diseases and other medical threats we would all be living in a true utopia-garden of Eden.
Picture two guys fighting inside a locked bunker with clubs or baseball bats. Then imagine they also have hand grenades. If you use a hand grenade there is a tiny, tiny chance that you kill the other guy without hurting yourself too much or Bleeding Out. That's the difference between conventional war and nuclear war. I would really not bet on that tiny chance.
Hohohohohohohohoh hahahahahahah dami kong tawa ah ! Congratulations , you hit the bulls eye Chapati ballistic masala curry missiles ng India. heheheheheheh !
US UGM-133 Trident II is the most dangerous simply because its submarine launched. First two are ICBMs launched from Russia and China so have much longer flight times plus their launch location is static, unlike submarine launched nukes. There is a good reason why America keeps the lions share of its nuclear deterrent on subs rather than in nuke silos.
Dangerous(Trident2) only in terms of the LSBM type, when the same RS28 is the most dangerous class in ICBM - even if you put these missiles into general statistics, then the Russian one is still better. Sarmat even more so tolerates hypersonic HGV modules that can strike with a force of 2 megatons, and the total power when reaching MIRV warheads will generally be 50 megatons + range 18.000 km.
I am not sure what qualifies one ICBM to be deadlier than another. Its not like ICBM will be fired at other ICBM , or will they? They all do essentially the same job and all would be exceedingly difficult to defend against. Maybe payload? but also reliability needs to be a top priority.
Don't forget sea and air launched cruise missiles, although classified medium range we have a large inventory. I worked on both Minute man III and when in service ground launched cruise in Europe during the cold war.
+Jose Echevarria Info from Wiki, defence websites, News and press media, images are from public domains. It took around 7-8 days to find all the relevant information
+Greg Hunt pretty sure on one of the Minuteman missile pics it is the GMD interceptor rather than the MM3...could be wrong, but it sure looks like the coastal Cali launches they use and the black paint
i dont understand how 200-ton missile(#1) can reach 7800 m/s? how a man made fuel supply can deal with this??? even this was made in 1990??? what the fuck is going on?
Those bombs is just a shitty idea on all levels. With their destructive power, the worst of them even threathen their own creators. In an all out nuclear war, there would be no winner for the next 10000 years (or so).
Completely disagree with the list. Without a shadow of doubt the number 1 should be Trident ii. The reasons why: 1) it is submarine launched and has better "strategic" capability. 2) they have a range that enable them to hit any target anywhere in the word. 3) they can be launched and hit their target within 40 minutes...this is quicker than it takes any other of the missiles on this list just to get targeting information programmed (ie: better first strike capability) 4) the American mark 5 missile carries 14 MIRVs each with a yield of 475kt. Each one of the MIRVs have a CEP of less than 120meters. Sorry but no missile can touch Trident...not even close!
barn2503 And how old are Tridents II D5 as same their lounch platform Ohio subs, do they have any countermeasures against advanced missile deffence systems! The Russian Borei subs are by the far newer and so Bulava ICBMs! Not to mention that S 400 & future S 500 will destroy many us missiles!
Evil Eye Trident ii can be fired from multiple launch platforms and not just Ohio subs, even the British Trafalgar class submarines are armed with trident ii. With regards to the age of the missiles, there have been numerous upgrades and modifications that keep this missile cutting edge. Its hard to improve perfection!!! With regards missile defense systems, re-entry velocities of the MIRVs are in excess of 6000 meters / second. At this speed most objects would vaporize due to the friction. The MIRVs are protected by 1 inch thick Carbon-Carbon composite, and this allows them to survive re-entry. The MIRv's were designed by the infamous Dr Gerald Bull, who was arguably the worlds greatest expert on ballistics and aerodynamics. In addition to lightning speed re-entry they also have the ability for "non parabolic variable trajectory", which makes it impossible for interception.
barn2503 the SS18 has 13 MIRVS with 880KT yeald and it can hit eny target with in 10 min...also most Western ICBM's are old unmodernized cold war crap.
barn2503 First of all. Some of the ICBM in this list can be launched by a submarine. Second a submarines range is far worse than a silo. Third submarine fired nuclear warhead is far more dangerous since submarines are vulnerable when firing.
As always in those vids,french materials grossly underrated.Why? Well,strategic missiles,,impossible to "forget" them.Then one can still grossly underrate them.
pieter lucas maria lemmens Why do you need accuracy? The blast wave could hit the target even if its 1000 meters away. The warhead is just 1 ton. Not really a good. But i know its big blast wave. but 1 ton isn't that great. The Agni V speed is 2.5km/s But the average speed of an ICBM is 5.0km/s. Not that great as well.
pieter lucas maria lemmens But I'm right about the accuracy am I? You don't need precise accuracy to destroy the target. The blastwave would do everything. You dumbasses are just wasting time perfecting its accuracy.
These are ICBMs (intercontinental ballistic missiles) and are designed for suborbital flight. That is how the payload can reach the target so quickly. Some are indeed capable of putting their payload into orbit (consider the Titan missile, a modified version of which launched NASA's Gemini missions).
I feel very glad that all of the nuclear-capable countries understand that sending nuclear weapons to another nuclear-armed country will bring on Mutally Assured Destruction (M.A.D). Otherwise, I can see what America and Russia's next move would be.
All ICBM's can reach anywhere from planet, theres nothing special about that chinese one. Thats why ICBMs are called ICBM BECAUSE THEY ARE INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILES
How could a liquid propellant missile be on top! do you have basic knowledge of military even? A liquid fuel missile need days of preparation specially a silo based missile is just useless in 21st century!
Arash Sheikholeslam True! All of what you say. However, the disadvantages you name become moot when this system is used as a first strike, sneak attack. The U S must abandon their outmoded policy of no first strike. Not many of their opponents observe the "Harvard Debating Team" niceties as the U S does. Having the moral high ground is not much solace when YOUR ground glows in the dark. Who would the U S address their woes to? The United Nations?!!! The majority of the delegates would happily dance on the U S collective grave. No, this is the 21st century with every tin pot dictator and religious fanatic lusting after thermonuclear weapons and having the U S squarely in their ground zero sights.
1Klooch LIquid fueled missiles CANNOT be used as first strike. There's no sneak attack when you are running hundreds of crews with fuel trucks out to the silos, opening those silos, running hoses, etc, all under the eyes of a couple KH surveillance satellites. The maker of the video knows zero about actually military application of these devices. They cannot be fueled and left sitting in silos because the fuel is corrosive and would destroy the missile.
Should it not be called "top 10 most lethal?" To say deadliest implies past tense and none of the items listed have killed anyone in action. Then again, it should be "most potentially lethal" to be absolutely correct.
+Chris Whited really? i thought that a 150kt warhead would vaporize everything in 200km radius.... 400 km in diameter. aprox, 250,000 km squared of an area. So you mean to tell me that there's a big difference between 150m and 350m of probable error ?
Interesting. Not sure if I am in complete agreement with the listing, but everyone has different opinons. What was the criteria used to make the decisions?
+Atul Burman laugh all u want, check most of the electronics in your house, i bet its made in china. they are learning and growing fast. over 1billion human speak chinese natively, english just over 300million. they might get the last laugh in the end. no offense
We in China do not buy any products and materials. All of our home electronics Made in Japan & Made in India grows.. China are all products & materials & Electronics worst, which becomes impaired when there is no warranty. ....................................................................................... While technology Made in Japan & Made in Russia is extremely good. Made in Japan all Products & Electronics is an extremely well.. I like Japan & Russia Technology.. 😛
My Mobile & laptop is also Made in Japan. I am using Sony Xperia C5 & Sony Vaio laptop. My Headphones & earphone & camera is also Made in Japan.. :-D :-P
+Atul Burman don't worry, Chinese won't hurt you or your country... Japanese product is good, but Chinese will copy it quickly, SOME ONE CLAIMS CHINESE STEAL OTHER COUNTRIES, BUT IN THE END, WHO MADE THE MONEY? Econmic is the deadlist weapon in the future, look US DID TO RUSSIA. hahahahaha
its nice watching a video about the things that will finish human life on this planet im amazed one hasnt gone off by accident or a lunatic or terrorism i think one will within next ten years
Despite all the negative comments, we are not living in the Age of Empires because the leading powers are afraid of a MAD with their contemporary rivals.
All these warheads and delivery platforms pale in comparison with the Titan II and its W53 warhead of 9 Megatons, plans were well underway to increase that to 25. If you want to obliterate entire regions, not just take out command and control facilities that is your baby!
how will you rate india's ICBM? they have tested this year. . Lots of reports have aired by CNN and other international media? Please share updated video also as in last 2 years lots of new things has introduced.
Rarest pepe I agree, people are encouraging, these weapons are hell, they are curse to mankind, most countries are simply piling them for securities not for intentional use. peace no to war
Once upon a time the SS-18(R-36) had a codenamed ORB version , unlimited range , in fact it placed a warhead into orbit. There goes your ''Missile Gap'' US faced, And the Reagan's Star Wars response. In 1983 they banned all weapons in space including SS-18. Rummours in internet say that, the so called "perimeter" in fact launched automatically all 18 ORB missiles . Within minutes USSR had 18 warheads in space, pointing at you . The Missile family burries the SS-18 , eighteen for the 18 unique orb launchers
No country should have nukes. But could a nuke save us from a asteroid? What if we got rid of all the nukes and then a asteroid at the size of Texas were heading towards the Earth? What would we do then? But I ask, would this be a good enough reason to keep any nukes at all?
Ilouv Thaïlande and China and pelesten and Japan and South Korea❤️❤️❤️❤️ form Morocco Amazigh ❤️🇲🇦 And these are my dreams that I am working on a project in these countries
if you've never watched the U.S. Minute Man 3 launch video...its pretty damn cool. warhead is launched into space where it automatically adjusts itself to its target, then relaunches back to earth to detonate.
I absolutely love reading all of these lousy comments about who's country is bigger and better. lol Nobody wins a nuclear war. All sides lose hundreds of millions of people. All sides are thrown back to the stone ages, and there want be any law and order for decades to come. I wish you all lady like luck in your debates.
***** How are you not dead? Also congrats on regaining your ability to walk.
***** I don't think you quite understood what I was saying. Might want to read my comment twice.
***** Good night.
*****
"Nobody wins a nuclear war."
I clearly sense, that you understood the principle of deterrence.
Dr. Strangelove Damn right, plus the nuclear winter that'll follow the war
Mmmm ... Russia is well represented in this top ten ... and that's what keeps that Bully of the block, the USA, at bay. I am with Russia.
Just name of contry is different ,they are fucking legal mass killers...satan love you bros !!! Jesus denis 777
John Shackleton USA do have anti-ballistic air defense in Europe that can stop most of those missiles before coming to USA ... i mean if Russia did bombed USA and Europe.
some states "middle and southern" in USA and UK and maybe Spain will survived ... but Russia and Europe will get exterminated.
why do you think Russia trying to take over Ukraine ??
they are trying to have more space to secure their defenses against USA and Europe.
John Shackleton This just ranks the missiles capable of carrying the biggest bomb highest, and since the Russians didn't have the same level of missile accuracy as the US so they developed larger warheads to compensate. The most deadly system is Trident which can carry upto 14 warheads on a single missile.
Globalization is what's keeping nations like China and the US at bay.
Uprising-Pulse Russia still has enough ICBM`s-/SLBM`s to saturate any defense capability.
They have also a lot of SRBM`s to attack the ABM launch sites in europe
A nuclear war between Russia and the NATO will bring awesome destruction to all of us, europe, russia and the USA
Kevin Maguire the most deadly system is still the RS-20(SS-18) with a payload of 8800kg, more than 3 times the payload of the Trident2 D5 (2800kg). The RS-20 is capable to carry up to 24MIRV with 500kt each, but not realized because of START(RS20a2)
Actually it carries 10 warheads between 800kt and 1Mt each
Trident 2 D5 carries up to 8 W88 (8x475kt) (also because of START)
I hate nukes. We should all go back to swords and shields! Much more personal, and honourable!!
Jamie Carter Yet much more painful.
Jamie Carter Could you even imagine a sword going through your stomach?
;~;
Decres if I had to choose a swordfight and die, or be evaporated by a bomb I'd choose the sword. At least I died fighting
Jamie Carter Thats nice.. I still prefer a bomb.
Decres cowards death
This world is for all of us. Such weapons will eliminate all foes and friends equally.
therefore it is the ultimate instrument of peace. one way or the other.
of US* lol
The Satan at over 200 tons and capable of such massive speeds is impressive beyond words! Russian technology at its very best..
+Juuso Peltoniemi 7 years 22rgt B Squadron Special Air Service says I know my bit about weapons, the comment I made references the sheer weight of such a missile and the speed it could attain..
+Draxindustries1 10 bucks that shit blows up right when they press the fire button.
+RageOrRevenge Russian liquid fuel rocket technology has a way better price/efficiency/reliability/quality ratio than American or European.
+RageOrRevenge Russian liquid fuel rocket technology has a way better price/efficiency/reliability/quality ratio than American or European.
+Juuso Peltoniemi solid fuel rockets are crap... liqiud can be controlled and is more efficient
A few things that you can be assured of after watching this is:
1) all of these have already been outclassed by more advanced and efficient missiles
2) even at the time of this video, there are other missiles equally as deadly or more that hadn't been disclosed
3) in all honesty, the assumption that any one of these are leaps better than any other missile on the list is really kind of pointless. As long as the missile has a decent range and speed and as long as it can carry a nuclear war head, it's going to be absurdly destructive so why even compare them?
When comparing the nations who have the means to wage nuclear war, the only points worth discussing are the amount of war heads owned, the means they have to deploy them, and the distance in which the war heads can travel, and the strength of their missile defense at home. It would be pointless to discuss the destructive power of the missiles you own if you don't have an efficient way to deploy them and also it would be futile to engage in a nuclear war if your home front cannot properly defend itself from a nuclear war head barrage on your front door. So basically, the nation with the best bombers, nuclear submarines, naval destroyers, and missile defense would be top dog I would think in everyone's mind.
That being said, Russia and the United States stand as the most powerful nations on the planet, and to be honest it's not something to be proud of.
Very true
basically, as long as North Korea doesn't make your missiles then you will be fine... and who knows how long that will even last
rs 24 yars is russian not china
He inserted it
Yes. China. They stole it. Hello
Almost everything China has is stolen Russian. Soviet or American technology
Erik B Not really the case anymore though... that was in the 60s and 70s
@@erikb8979 commies like to share their toys with other commies.
Shame on humanity for having these type of world killers aimed at each other. Shame
Hypnotic wonderful
no its aimed at aliens
if they weren´t there we would long since have had a third and maybe fourth world war. They are the best deterrent there is from waging war
I thought the same, as a mecanism of prevention.
but the third world war would not extinguish the man kind.
Maybe this rating is true about strongth of warhead, but more advanced smaller missiles more deadly. Bulava as example much more survivable at all stages of flight, equipped with huge pack of fake targets, maneurable warheads, etc.
Just imagine if even 1/4 of that money spent on missiles was spent towards medicine or food for children....
we human are the unique creature who are building weapons of our destruction with alot of pride and happiness . 😢
+TRUTH SPREADER unfortunately, that is exactly true. But what really invites conflicts and war is the weakness. If we are weak, we are inviting trouble. Thats how this world is right now. So, this show of strength is to ensure no one messes with us.
It’s amazing we’ve lived this long.
F
DON'T FOOL YOURSELVES THAT WE'VE.LIVE. BECAUSE 50 YEARS GOES BY VERY QUICKLY AND BY 50 MOST PEOPLE ARE SICK DIEING IN CHRONIC AGONISING PAIN AND THE FIRST 10 YEARS DON'T EVEN COUNT BECAUSE YOU. HAVEN'T EVEN LIVED AND 40 PERCENT OF LIFE WERE ASLEEP
@@elmerpacheco5530 lol
5:10 "I think it must be damp!" ~James May
The Russians and the Chinese have a number of different ICBM's on this list.....
I'm thinking the U.S. needs to re-deploy the LGM-118A Peacekeeper missile....
It's more modern than the LGM-30 Minuteman III system.....and had better MIRV capability
If it were in service, I wonder where it would have made it on this list?
I clearly remember that October day in 1990 when Curtis Lemay passed away. I was working directly under a retired Colonel who had retired after 36 years in the Air Force in about 1980. We were both with the DoD, (stationed at the same Aerospace Facility). I was just a "pup" with 11 years in. I walked into the Colonel's office and paid my respects. He had worked closely with Lemay for a bit in the late 1950's and 1960's. We both knew that Lemay had on 3 or 4 occasions called for the USA to launch a "First Strike" against the Soviet Union. Few men, even that high in the military establishment, had ever pushed his views on the POTUSA to actually do "it". Lemay was a national hero, but was also one of the few men on Earth that almost extinguished civilization. Mixed feelings at his loss to say the least...
No mixed feelings here. Lemay was a sociopath who used the military for “cover.” Not only Russia but he wanted to nuke China too. It would have only been a matter of time before they hit us back the same.
Watch this new video.
th-cam.com/video/Zgok9aiLWPc/w-d-xo.html
Ffh
Ground Zero lfc
gnghy
Ground Zero
Ground Zero
background music 👍👍 awesome
Hate wars and protect humanity .... Love from INDIA ❤️
yeah thats why india is protecting humanity..BY KILLING 1000,S INNOCENT IN KASHMIR FUCK YOUR DOUBLE STANDARD TWO FACED HUMANITY PROTECTION LIE
wars rule
Well lets hope none of these will ever need to be used.
I also hope for that....
The TEL based ICBMs and the SLBMs are far more deadly than silo based ICBMs. A submarine carrying say a Trident 2 missile can close to minimum launch range drastically reducing reaction time. Both submarine and TEL based ICBMs are mobile and pretty much impossible to eliminate in a preemptive strike.
- А может быть бахнем?
- Обязательно бахнем! И не раз! Весь мир в труху! Но потом...
откуда эта фраза?
@@yourbigfan1777 ДМБ
大国的兵器只是互相威慑，谁都不敢真正打架的，不管你多先进，原子弹的威力谁都懂，互相毁灭是不可能的，祈祷人类不要自相残杀。
+荒芜心 wang chig pong :D
+Shafiq Islam hahahahaah
sorry if i hart ur feelings... i was just kidding
+Shafiq Islam Islam ? hahahahaha....fuck
+荒芜心 I'm guessing your saying something wonderful about how great china is. such is the propaganda.
The DF-41 with 10 MIVR and flies at mach 20 is the deadlest missile,
Guys, as I know, RS-24 Yars is not China. Such type of mistakes should be corrected:))
PROUD TO BE AN INDIAN NATIONALIST..
Горд быть индийского национального ..
自豪的是印度的民族主义..
BİR HİNT MİLLİYETÇİ OLMAK GURUR ..
Fier d'être un nationaliste indien
STOLZ, EIN INDISCHES Nationalist zu sein ..
yeh kon konsha language hai
Lol idk why I'm here I'm just high af😂
I am high too during watching this😂
Ok. After this video I know that the " YARS" is a Chinese rocket. :))))))
I hope you laugh as well as I. In the world it is usually to take into service a foreign nuclear weapons :))))))))))))))))) Strange though that the Chinese testing it in Siberia (as pictured) and abbreviation missiles (RS) is not typical for Chinese missiles
+Black_Ronin YARS is a Russian ICBM, there was a mistake in editing but we corrected that and it is visible only on desktop.
+Ground Zero Ok. You are correct. I see it in description. But who looks on description?..
+Ground Zero
You have another little mistake. Layner correct code is not R29-RMU2, but R29-RMU2.1. Layner (in service since 2014) is a modification of R29-RMU2, called Sineva (in service since 2007). So R29-RMU2 = "SINEVA" and "LAYNER" = R29-RMU2.1
Black_Ronin
Agreed dude you have good facts... It shows that Russia and China have the best Nuclear bombs/missiles.
And if we, the world, would spend 1/3 of the money, time, knowledge we spend on these missiles on a cure and prevention for cancer, infectious diseases and other medical threats we would all be living in a true utopia-garden of Eden.
Sick edeting skills bro!
Welcome to the civilized world....
Next Person Who complains about India not being on the list Will have A Trident Launched At Them :P
TagcastCrew Trident in an old missile. Modern Anti-Ballistic missiles have a higher chance of intercepting it. :P
:P I'll Launch Paint it Blue So it look like da sky and you won't see it
lol
Hello you white skinned racist... you look like a guy suffering from vitiligo.
Terry I
in the future, there will be black hole nukes. When it blows, it will create a small black hole that sucks in everything within a 200 mile radius :D
No shit
dumb fk
They grow.
Cool! Now make a video of top ten Kinetic Energy Interceptors! What ICBM?
Picture two guys fighting inside a locked bunker with clubs or baseball bats. Then imagine they also have hand grenades. If you use a hand grenade there is a tiny, tiny chance that you kill the other guy without hurting yourself too much or Bleeding Out. That's the difference between conventional war and nuclear war. I would really not bet on that tiny chance.
you forgot India curry masala III chilli powered 3 stages with 3-4 chapatti wearheads
Omg the strongest in earth more stronger then satin missile and heroshima XDDD
+lastpokemon FML
+lastpokemon HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Hohohohohohohohoh hahahahahahah dami kong tawa ah ! Congratulations , you hit the bulls eye Chapati ballistic masala curry missiles ng India. heheheheheheh !
1:59 is actually in Russia.
building up the relationship is more important than all this.end of the day you will be destroyed too
US UGM-133 Trident II is the most dangerous simply because its submarine launched. First two are ICBMs launched from Russia and China so have much longer flight times plus their launch location is static, unlike submarine launched nukes. There is a good reason why America keeps the lions share of its nuclear deterrent on subs rather than in nuke silos.
Dangerous(Trident2) only in terms of the LSBM type, when the same RS28 is the most dangerous class in ICBM - even if you put these missiles into general statistics, then the Russian one is still better. Sarmat even more so tolerates hypersonic HGV modules that can strike with a force of 2 megatons, and the total power when reaching MIRV warheads will generally be 50 megatons + range 18.000 km.
I am not sure what qualifies one ICBM to be deadlier than another. Its not like ICBM will be fired at other ICBM , or will they? They all do essentially the same job and all would be exceedingly difficult to defend against. Maybe payload? but also reliability needs to be a top priority.
nobody wins in nuclear war......
except of course...
USA
@@yourbigfan1777 not
@@yourbigfan1777 usa cant even win against taliban
RS-24 Yars -Russia,not China lol
Damn. Rusia has all d good shit. But then again. I love old fashion way. Give me a sword, or we can even do punches..
nah USA is too far away from the russia
Don't forget sea and air launched cruise missiles, although classified medium range we have a large inventory. I worked on both Minute man III and when in service ground launched cruise in Europe during the cold war.
I love how people here are SERIOUSLY convinced people will just slam on the nuke button!
top 10 Deadliest nukes?? WTF Author... is there such thing as a non deadly nuke??
+helinick81 Mexican Nukes... it only causes you diarrhea.
+*fg@ffgf5885sd55s yes and the device you are using right now is probably made by them.
nooooooooo!
helinick81
Davy crocket
Yars its Russian rocket, not China
where is the DONGFENG -41 ?
what about DONGFENG-5B?
+王银栋 is df_3a strong?
Dude that sound track is awesome. Where did you get it?
What’s the yield on each? How can it be the top 10 if you don’t tell us the power each war head has?
How you get the info and the images?
+Jose Echevarria Info from Wiki, defence websites, News and press media, images are from public domains.
It took around 7-8 days to find all the relevant information
+Jose Echevarria they probably guessing lol
+Ground Zero because they are 100% accurate :)
+Greg Hunt pretty sure on one of the Minuteman missile pics it is the GMD interceptor rather than the MM3...could be wrong, but it sure looks like the coastal Cali launches they use and the black paint
+Ground Zero r-36 m2 - (Satan) icbm is not the most deadliest nuke in the world, tzar bomba is!
rs 24 is russian, not chinese
You are right, this is our mistake sorry about that, we corrected it.
ok, no problem, just wanted to mention it
RoyalQueenSarah , Agreed, but it (and anything else) can be counted as Chinese for they use to copy any (& every) stuff...!
+Sanjeetha Vasu
Thanks for your innovation on deadly weapons, from China
+Sanjeetha Vasu dude the missle on number 7 is a pure russian weapon america is always blaming things on china
i dont understand how 200-ton missile(#1) can reach 7800 m/s? how a man made fuel supply can deal with this??? even this was made in 1990??? what the fuck is going on?
Dude the world is ending and we both know how. It's going to be painful, not emotionally but being physically vaporized by some science discovery.
lol who is afraid of nukes, it is quick vaporization, i wanna get nuked right now
vvv Dhk
Yeah it's all fun and games till you survive the explosion and have to Crawl from hiroshima to hatsukaichi all burnt up.
Innosaint Nwoke Chinedu
so I should pray that I be right underneath it
vvv Dhk
Duuuudddeeee
In addition, the RS-28 (Sarmat) which is a Russian developed ICBM is soon to replace the SS-18 (Satana) portrayed in the video.
Those bombs is just a shitty idea on all levels. With their destructive power, the worst of them even threathen their own creators. In an all out nuclear war, there would be no winner for the next 10000 years (or so).
Nuclear hand-grenades would be fun ;-) Limit: One per soldier.
+Zoe TheCat Lol yeah that would be fun... in ARMA 3... I'll use mine on you first....
+Zoe TheCat
Holy grenade... (if you know the reference).
ص63+Peeta Four'Eth ب
قan-JaceThomas لس3#1€
MellarkEatonWateWayland 5جئ
wtf
was that a threat to blow me up? .... arabic symbols
Completely disagree with the list. Without a shadow of doubt the number 1 should be Trident ii. The reasons why:
1) it is submarine launched and has better "strategic" capability.
2) they have a range that enable them to hit any target anywhere in the word.
3) they can be launched and hit their target within 40 minutes...this is quicker than it takes any other of the missiles on this list just to get targeting information programmed (ie: better first strike capability)
4) the American mark 5 missile carries 14 MIRVs each with a yield of 475kt. Each one of the MIRVs have a CEP of less than 120meters.
Sorry but no missile can touch Trident...not even close!
barn2503
And how old are Tridents II D5 as same their lounch platform Ohio subs, do they have any countermeasures against advanced missile deffence systems! The Russian Borei subs are by the far newer and so Bulava ICBMs! Not to mention that S 400 & future S 500 will destroy many us missiles!
Evil Eye Trident ii can be fired from multiple launch platforms and not just Ohio subs, even the British Trafalgar class submarines are armed with trident ii. With regards to the age of the missiles, there have been numerous upgrades and modifications that keep this missile cutting edge. Its hard to improve perfection!!!
With regards missile defense systems, re-entry velocities of the MIRVs are in excess of 6000 meters / second. At this speed most objects would vaporize due to the friction. The MIRVs are protected by 1 inch thick Carbon-Carbon composite, and this allows them to survive re-entry. The MIRv's were designed by the infamous Dr Gerald Bull, who was arguably the worlds greatest expert on ballistics and aerodynamics. In addition to lightning speed re-entry they also have the ability for "non parabolic variable trajectory", which makes it impossible for interception.
barn2503 the SS18 has 13 MIRVS with 880KT yeald and it can hit eny target with in 10 min...also most Western ICBM's are old unmodernized cold war crap.
Juuso Peltoniemi last modernization was in 1990.
barn2503 First of all. Some of the ICBM in this list can be launched by a submarine. Second a submarines range is far worse than a silo. Third submarine fired nuclear warhead is far more dangerous since submarines are vulnerable when firing.
yars is russian not. chines
yeah
“I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.”
- Albert Einstein
Wait for agni 6 and Surya ICBM
wait until I finish mine then we will see about that SATAN
this is why im a satanist. hail satan! (see beneath the planet of the apes)
one of these will distroy our earth!pitty!
doubtfull, nukes can only clear the life forms living on the surface, the planet will be fine.
1:43: Yars is Russian modification of Russian Topol-M. Why Chinese, lol.
..
You forgot Peacekeeper ICBM deactivated but should be in top 3 easy.
As always in those vids,french materials grossly underrated.Why? Well,strategic missiles,,impossible to "forget" them.Then one can still grossly underrate them.
XD I ONLT CAME FOR THE EXPLOSIONS NOT THE FACTS
what about indian ICBM
RICKY SINGH Indian ICBM's have such a bad warhead. Gtfo
Decres Agni 5 is a great rocket with a nice warhead. Agni 5 is so precise it can hit the room you are reading this words. Be vigilant not arrogant.
pieter lucas maria lemmens Why do you need accuracy? The blast wave could hit the target even if its 1000 meters away. The warhead is just 1 ton. Not really a good. But i know its big blast wave. but 1 ton isn't that great. The Agni V speed is 2.5km/s But the average speed of an ICBM is 5.0km/s. Not that great as well.
Decres Do you really think the Indian military offers wikipedia the right information? We love it that you underestimate us:)
pieter lucas maria lemmens But I'm right about the accuracy am I? You don't need precise accuracy to destroy the target. The blastwave would do everything. You dumbasses are just wasting time perfecting its accuracy.
00:02:31 Flight altitude 1120Km? Are you serious?
Yes, this is what Wikipedia says.
That's satellite orbit. I doubt a missile can climb so high, not that it needs to.
yes..., the missiles are made for out to in earth up-surface
These are ICBMs (intercontinental ballistic missiles) and are designed for suborbital flight. That is how the payload can reach the target so quickly. Some are indeed capable of putting their payload into orbit (consider the Titan missile, a modified version of which launched NASA's Gemini missions).
Mundial Zulia
also the Music makes it seem scary asf idk if it's just me but that guys voice makes it seem terrifying especially with pictures of nuclear missiles
I feel very glad that all of the nuclear-capable countries understand that sending nuclear weapons to another nuclear-armed country will bring on Mutally Assured Destruction (M.A.D).
Otherwise, I can see what America and Russia's next move would be.
What happened with just throwing grenades??
lol
Where is china DF41 china's best missile that can reach anywhere on earth.
All ICBM's can reach anywhere from planet, theres nothing special about that chinese one. Thats why ICBMs are called ICBM BECAUSE THEY ARE INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILES
How could a liquid propellant missile be on top! do you have basic knowledge of military even? A liquid fuel missile need days of preparation specially a silo based missile is just useless in 21st century!
Miwa Che
Arash Sheikholeslam True! All of what you say. However, the disadvantages you name become moot when this system is used as a first strike, sneak attack. The U S must abandon their outmoded policy of no first strike. Not many of their opponents observe the "Harvard Debating Team" niceties as the U S does. Having the moral high ground is not much solace when YOUR ground glows in the dark. Who would the U S address their woes to? The United Nations?!!! The majority of the delegates would happily dance on the U S collective grave. No, this is the 21st century with every tin pot dictator and religious fanatic lusting after thermonuclear weapons and having the U S squarely in their ground zero sights.
1Klooch ur ju stoopid?
1Klooch LIquid fueled missiles CANNOT be used as first strike. There's no sneak attack when you are running hundreds of crews with fuel trucks out to the silos, opening those silos, running hoses, etc, all under the eyes of a couple KH surveillance satellites. The maker of the video knows zero about actually military application of these devices. They cannot be fueled and left sitting in silos because the fuel is corrosive and would destroy the missile.
Solid-fuel is safer and less expensive. A solid-fueled missile could be placed in a silo for 20 years and STILL be launchable.
Should it not be called "top 10 most lethal?" To say deadliest implies past tense and none of the items listed have killed anyone in action. Then again, it should be "most potentially lethal" to be absolutely correct.
accuracy is what matters in reality, outside of special defenses.
+Chris Whited really? i thought that a 150kt warhead would vaporize everything in 200km radius.... 400 km in diameter. aprox, 250,000 km squared of an area. So you mean to tell me that there's a big difference between 150m and 350m of probable error ?
The toys of the insane!
rs 24 yars is Russian
Glorifying doomsday weapons. Great!
Nice time to recommend this video 👍🏻😒
Interesting. Not sure if I am in complete agreement with the listing, but everyone has different opinons. What was the criteria used to make the decisions?
Don't war, make love!
What If you love to make War? Lol
get rid of them all
You sir have got the right idea
как я уже говорил ранее, вы находитесь подонок хиппи
+Noah Parkin почему ебать ты звонишь мне, что
я не
China's missile does not hit on any precise target.. Chinese toy can just jump to their at home. Expire Chinese Product Hahaha 😄😃😊😛
+Atul Burman laugh all u want, check most of the electronics in your house, i bet its made in china. they are learning and growing fast. over 1billion human speak chinese natively, english just over 300million. they might get the last laugh in the end. no offense
We in China do not buy any products and materials. All of our home electronics Made in Japan & Made in India grows..
China are all products & materials & Electronics worst, which becomes impaired when there is no warranty. .......................................................................................
While technology Made in Japan & Made in Russia is extremely good. Made in Japan all Products & Electronics is an extremely well.. I like Japan & Russia Technology.. 😛
My Mobile & laptop is also Made in Japan. I am using Sony Xperia C5 & Sony Vaio laptop. My Headphones & earphone & camera is also Made in Japan.. :-D :-P
+Atul Burman don't worry, Chinese won't hurt you or your country... Japanese product is good, but Chinese will copy it quickly, SOME ONE CLAIMS CHINESE STEAL OTHER COUNTRIES, BUT IN THE END, WHO MADE THE MONEY? Econmic is the deadlist weapon in the future, look US DID TO RUSSIA. hahahahaha
+Atul Burman In China, more and more people become rich, I made 5MILLIONs dollors a year, what about you?
China s mobile DF-41 carries 10 MIVR at mach 20 speed.The one thousand DF-41 are hidden in 3,000 nuclear resistant tunnels.
Minuteman is old, but still effective.
its nice watching a video about the things that will finish human life on this planet im amazed one hasnt gone off by accident or a lunatic or terrorism i think one will within next ten years
Despite all the negative comments, we are not living in the Age of Empires because the leading powers are afraid of a MAD with their contemporary rivals.
My farts have more ICBM than all these nuclears lol 😂💀
😂
nice video
All these warheads and delivery platforms pale in comparison with the Titan II and its W53 warhead of 9 Megatons, plans were well underway to increase that to 25. If you want to obliterate entire regions, not just take out command and control facilities that is your baby!
All 10 are number 1 lol. They are all deadly, depending where their final trajectory takes the MIRVs.
how will you rate india's ICBM? they have tested this year. . Lots of reports have aired by CNN and other international media?
Please share updated video also as in last 2 years lots of new things has introduced.
Rarest pepe
I agree, people are encouraging, these weapons are hell, they are curse to mankind, most countries are simply piling them for securities not for intentional use.
peace no to war
And sometimes the only way to secure peace is through war.
We may as well get it over with and begin dropping nukes. On the grand scale of things, I'm not sure it matters at this stage in the game.
Uuuuuii......
That's cute, meanwhile in the U.S we have weapons of peace that have a world ending 1 million kiloton yield cause freedom.
We spent so much money on these. What a nightmare if they're ever used.
Once upon a time the SS-18(R-36) had a codenamed ORB version , unlimited range , in fact it placed a warhead into orbit. There goes your ''Missile Gap'' US faced, And the Reagan's Star Wars response. In 1983 they banned all weapons in space including SS-18. Rummours in internet say that, the so called "perimeter" in fact launched automatically all 18 ORB missiles . Within minutes USSR had 18 warheads in space, pointing at you .
The Missile family burries the SS-18 , eighteen for the 18 unique orb launchers
No country should have nukes. But could a nuke save us from a asteroid? What if we got rid of all the nukes and then a asteroid at the size of Texas were heading towards the Earth? What would we do then? But I ask, would this be a good enough reason to keep any nukes at all?
Ilouv Thaïlande and China and pelesten and Japan and South Korea❤️❤️❤️❤️ form Morocco Amazigh ❤️🇲🇦 And these are my dreams that I am working on a project in these countries
if you've never watched the U.S. Minute Man 3 launch video...its pretty damn cool. warhead is launched into space where it automatically adjusts itself to its target, then relaunches back to earth to detonate.