@@christophercarillo6342 I guess, but it took a direct hit to the wing, cracked the rear spar and was still able to land Gotta admit, that's one tough bird
@@christophercarillo6342 You're thinking of the wrong flight, it was a DHL aircraft that was struck in the wing by a SAM, the aircraft lost all hydraulic pressure and the wing was on fire, yet they still managed to land, although they skidded off the runway into a minefield.
just look at that kid that so desperately tries to impress a wrong audience with his skateboarder outlook and gestures. You expected balanced data... even facts? :)
I prefer Airbus, simply because of the fact that where I live, I fly everywhere in either the A320 or the B737 nad A320 feels roomier, probably because it is wider, and a bit more refined.
@@Paolo-sw8ys On discovery there was a entire documentary about the Apollo program. In episode 4 the explorers the lunar rover is mentioned 23:30 th-cam.com/video/IildAmV2l64/w-d-xo.html
@@charlieh1006 He Said He will Not Talk About McDonnell Douglas Aircraft. The F-15, F/A-18, C-17 and F/A-18E/F were Already In Production When Boeing Acquired them.
A few additions, Airbus is head quartered in France, the main owners are the French, German and Spanish states with together 30% of the shares. And it's a damned good thing there is competition, both Airbus and Boeing have factories around the world. Boeing was originally Böeing and a German immigrant to the US. Eventually they will have to compete with the Chinese too. Had to add that they both produce fine aircraft.
@@JJJT- And the a350 has far more leg room than the 787 and is quieter, the 787's fuselage creeps into the legroom allot if you get a window seat, I agree the a380 is almost silent.
I find that Airbus planes are a bit more stable in flight during light turbulence (particularly clear air turbulence) due to the advanced flight computers being able to compensate for it before the plane actually starts to move (I have seen the ailerons flapping all over the place and the plane doesn't really move that much), same for windshear compensation But for heavier turbulence, the more flexible wings that Boeing is known for usually provides a smoother ride
Which plane, depends on the pilot. The main difference for the pilot is that each different plane cockpit configuration for Boeing is different but with Airbus they are all the same so the pilot can jump from one cokpit to another different plane and all the controls are in the same place, a big selling point as less training is needed.
Me personally, I would appreciate a little less showmanship / selfdisplay and therefore a little more facts. Almost 13 minutes just to state, that those two companies have different histories and quite similar product families, that's a waste of my time.
For me - this was a rather irritating comparison of dissimilar company groups. one perhaps being involved in rather too much and one that sticks to the knitting. A comparison of like with like would actually have been very interesting. Oh and just in case your program might be seen in Europe do remember that there the only humans who wear caps back to front are five and six year olds pretending to be cool. Adults wearing them like that frankly do not come across as, shall we say 'knowledgeable'.
@@Repented008 oh, so you judge by the avatar picture :-) this is not "sucseeding" it is bullshitting. Since when do we measure succsess in amount of bullshit per minute? If this kid would have developed a new plane engine using less fuel, and beeing more reliable - that i would call success - but that still seem to be the domain of bitter old men ;)
At 9:20 while talking about Boeings contribution to space, you actually show a satellite made by Airbus. It’s the Galileo IOV satellite for the European GPS equivalent.
also a FAA that is for nationalistic reasons in bed with the nations company boing - and all that MAGA protectionist bullshit going on in the states that make boing a dangerous company, they completely relying on market-/shareholder/-autoregulation. Airbus on the other hand is a multinational company, and so far - the euro authorities are less corrupt when it comes to certifying and inspecting. thats the whole "secret" no one seem want to talk about.
good lord mate way to brag about it and most likely you said all of this because the 737 max accidents and then said Boeing is the worst company ever. is this correct
I don't think they can win mine back. Why? 1. They didn't properly inform and train pilots. It is reported that there is no mention of the MCAS in the flight manuals of the plane. 2. They made the warning light an extra. It's literally essential. 3. All of this problem was because they instead of building the airplane from scratch used an old airplane to fit in new and bigger engines that the airplane was not design for. They were cheap and these people payed for it. 4. Boeing did much of the work in certifying the plane instead of the FAA. Just so it could be faster the approval process. 4. And even after they knew all of this they blamed the customer for the 1st crash. The second crash could have been avoided if they didn't have blamed the first crash on the customer and had fixed the software/plane right away.
Rui Terra Yes I think mine too, it’s too risky, this is our lives we are talking about not a sum of money or a few days work, from now on if it is Boeing I will not fly or change company to a one that uses Airbus.
Rui Terra Good points. The only thing I know for sure is that I will not travel on this death plane. Did you see the news today? The preliminary report shows that the pilots followed the exact procedure that Boeing said the pilots “should have done”, and yet the plane still activated nose dive function into the ground? There is so much wrong with this aircraft.
The biggest difference is the US market which is the most profitable restricts Airbus just like it restricted Concorde which was a fantastic aircraft the most reliable safe supersonic passenger aircraft ever. If the US didn't restrict airbus you'd see 380's in every major US airport. Instead of airbus ceasing to build another fantastic jet
You missed one really important difference between the two manufacturers: Automation versus hand flying. Boeing aircraft typically use flight yokes, whereas Airbus aircraft use little joysticks, known as side sticks. Boeing flight yokes are typically designed to give tactile feedback to the pilots, whereas Airbus side sticks do not. Boeing aircraft are meant to be flown first, and automation second, whereas Airbus aircraft are designed to fly themselves, with the pilots monitoring the systems. This is why the 737 MAX has been so disastrous for Boeing, because they have never created such a system before, whereas Airbus has been doing this for over 20 years, and has paid for those lessons in blood. This begs the question why Boeing didn't take advantage of Airbus's missteps; in 2010 an Airbus A320 crashed during a test flight by an airline, when two of the three AOA sensors frozen in place at the same time, due to improper washing procedures. The flight computer ignored the working sensor, incorrectly diagnosing the faulty sensors. The plane crashed, because the pilots were too low to the ground to figure this out and to recover. And just to think that Boeing only used one AOA sensor for the MCAS system... even Airbus was smart enough to use three before the 2010 crash.
Loop IF they do; they've got tons of lines of businesses and aircraft to fall back on. But it is ironic all the same. They tried to pull an Airbus, without studying one's automation line-by-line, component-by-component, and reviewing all the safety investigations over the past three decades to have an idea on how to do it. Had they done so, the twin 737 MAX crashes would have never happened.
As a passenger of many years I used to be a big fan of Boeing but have found that later variants of Airbus aircraft are much smoother, roomier(I think they are wider)quieter to fly in, especially the A380 which is fantastic aircraft for long haul.
Agreed, in general Boeing aircraft are much noisier than their Airbus counterparts. However the noisiest I have ever traveled on was an old Iran Air Tupolev 134 - nasty!!
@@poruatokin The only Russian plane Ive flown on was on Aeroflot from Bangkok to London via Moscow in 1973, not sure what aircaraft it was but it looked like VC10. I think someone in the British aircraft industry was leaking all the plans to Russia, same with Concordski......
@@cliffbartle3772 Sounds like it was an Ilyushin IL-62. There were many rumors at the time about the TU-144 blueprint origins but I believe they were debunked many years later. Later, the leading conspiracy theory was that the Concorde team "leaked" a deliberately flawed set of designs to the Soviets to hinder their progress.
ill never fly on a Boeing Max ever.. i did flew in Mexico on a new Airbus ... quiet, comfortable and fast loved it had such a good time... love how theyre design is not a flaw... unlike Max is a total flaw they basically screwed the 747 and tried to fix it with one sensor.
It was a group of scienctists who were supporting the fact that sun is in the center of the solar system but christians did not like it causing there killings and causing heavy retaliation from illuminati(the enlightened one or the knowledgeable people) but all their books have been destroyed and some stored in the christian archives in vatican basically christian did a genocide like they did of the jews
Selena Rose basically illuminati is an extremist secret society of zoinest, zoinism is an extremist group from the religion judaism, currently they hold the world bank under their control they hold music and film industries all around the world of every country, and pay them to promote their illuminati’s agenda, which is to brain wash the little kids by cartoons and super heroes movies and try to engage other people from music...!! They want the total control on the entire world and they want to put their one/new world order and wanna make other people to their slaves and wanna reduces world population, coz their agenda is, least population easy control and the other last thing they believe in lucifer is their god and dajjal is their messiah...!! Hope you’ll understand just try to make more research!!
When u mention that boeing has made the F15 and FA18 u could also mention that airbus former companies like Aerospatiale (france) and Messerschmitt Bölkow Blohm (germany) made a lot of firsts and impressive Airplanes like the Concorde or the Me 262. Then there is a history of Airbus nearly as long as Boeing is around.
@@pauldurlacher2217 They dont all the development constructing and further went on when these plants were Mc Donnel Douglas even the F15 strike eagle was made by MD. Even the Boeing 717 was a Blueprint of MD.
Wow! So clever! It's almost like I haven't heard that one a million times.. jeez. Get clever or go home buddy. As good as Airbus is.. they will never have the legacy and revolutionary design that Boeing has achieved in its 100 plus years. Airbus wouldn't exist without Boeing. Boeing standardized and invented many of the aviation engineering techniques used today. So you can love Airbus all you want. But don't undervalue what Boeing has done for aviation because Airbus doesn't even come close to the achievements of Boeing.
The official headquarter is in Leiden/ Netherlands. Call it tax haven or just a place not in France and Germany. Toulouse might be the largest facility. But that's another story. I know, this is hard to accept for a French
@@thomashausner6962 You're citing the seat of the Airbus Group, which is a holding with several divisions (helicopters, military and space technology operations) plus various other shares. Was formerly known as EADS. Airbus S.A.S., the Airbus Group division that builds the Airbus planes (and which is older as an organization than the holding owning it) has its seat in Toulouse.
@@thomashausner6962 dude, it's hard to accept for you, but "Toulouse is the home of Airbus headquarters", "Airbus headquarters are located in the southwest region of Occitanie, near the Toulouse-Blagnac Airport", this comes from the official website of Airbus.
right, Boeing is supposed to have more experience how to construct safe airplanes. The performance of the 747 was simply awesome, actually, all Boeing models did well. Airbus is like the little brother, they were under pressure not to make any mistake because Boeing was already dominating and if they did the slightest plunder they would be out forever. Since approx 25% of people have slight degrees of fear of flying (aviophobia, affects just 6.5 percent), the aviation industry is mainly about safety in flight.
Boeing have more experience come on ! ,same can be said of car makers but look at what Boeing has done with 737 what a serious balls up ,cancelled orders because they said they added a feature making it look like a slight upgrade when they made a drastic change this avoided new model ATS full approval,now many hundreds of innocence people lost their lives.RIP.OH Airbus use Rolls Royce jet engines the safest in the world.
@@oranges866 Limited blade issues, true .My point is Boeing knew they cut a corner on 737 and most likely ruined a good aircraft ,and not having the new equipment training.Why Rolls Royce used inferior blades has to be stupid to. Loss of life is the same for every family, no excuses.
@@carmelosevilla6696 Bitch Pls Yeah Better at Crashing and killing People, Airbus dont do that though so Airbus is way better and safer than any Boeing thats not going today !!!! and OH yeah Boeing is Better on the ground too when it don't fly
Airbus makes better aircraft. Compare 737 and A320, I flew on both types and found the A320 to be more comfortable . One major difference which is observable is the landing speed. The A320 approaches and lands at slower speed and just requires wheel brakes without reverse thrust to slow down. Really comfortable landing. The 737 has much faster approaching speed and when it touches down, the reverse thrust seem to be on full throttle to slow it down. You can actually feel being thrown forward as this happens. Perhaps why many 737 skid off the runway during landing in bad weather is because of this.
Aaron Richard reversers do very little if anything on normal and dry days. 737 and 320 both mostly use wheel brakes. Both are fantastic aircraft and approach speed is more based on a companies SOP then the aircraft.
Honestly due to the many companies boeing acquired and not to mention boeings experience and the companies they acquired too experiences boeing will always remain top aircraft manufacturer
You clearly need to look into the lineage of Airbus. Just from the UK side their history can be traced back through companies such as Hawker and its predecessors to pre-1920.
Not really. The 737-Max is a complete failure with 2 crashes in 4 months due to Boeing and the FAA overlooking basic aerodynamics with the new engine replacements going above the wings and the new autopilot adjustment sensor systems not having a backup when it fails. (which was what caused the 2 crashes already). Airbus' neo series has some of the most advanced and safe systems and also have some of the most luxurious cabins in existence. I like Boeing, but considering the corruption of them with the FAA, I don't think they can be trusted so easily anymore.
Their design philosophy is quite different. Airbus puts the computer in control with the pilot as a monitor, and in many situations the pilots can not override the computer controlling the airplane. Boeing always gives the pilot the ability to have final authority, with one note able exception, the B737Max, which is being revised to allow pilot over ride as we speak. Pilots fly Boeings and use computers systems to assist at their discretion. Computers fly Airbus aircraft with pilots providing computer inputs. In an Airbus, the computer has final authority. An early A300 demonstrator crashed at an air show during a low level fly by because it had not been programmed to do such a maneuver. The engineers had said "why would you ever want to do that? If you are that low and slow you are going to land." Which the computer did, only there was no runway there. I'm an engineer, and you just can't think of and program around every situation that can arise. You can get most of them , but not all of them. I'll take a Mark One brain as the final authority all day long, and the B737Max will emerge from the dark side soon.
it was actually an a 320 and the pilots who were barely trained on the a320 shut down some of the computer which other systems were referring too. which caused a minor failure. At the end u can shut down the computers and fly it perfectly on your own.
And yet, Airbus is ending A380 production, well below the sales that Airbus projected. The 747-8 will continue production as a freighter. Air France is reducing its A380 fleet, because there aren't enough routes that can fill that large of a plane profitably.
The premise is that companies are battling each other. Not so fast. In telephone, early patents allowed the Bell System to quickly take 80% of the nation's present and future networks. GTE invented the phone dialer and was able to secure it's own 15% of the nation's phone market. What was left were the mountainous and desert areas which made service more expensive and less reliable. GTE's reputation suffered. Telco engineers knew otherwise. Both Airbus and Boeing will continue to lead in aerospace engineering projects, world wide. Cast of 1,000s.
can you do 10 facts about syria? -christianity started in syria -bread was first ever made in syria -the first music note was found in syria -alphabit was first ever found in ougaret in west syria -damascus is the oldest capital in the world -aleppo is the oldest City in the world -syria origin is not arabian but actually syrianic and more sure
airbus because not a single airplane manufactured by airbus has crashed due to manufacturing or engineering default. Its planes are the safest. Its also has more advanced autopilots and other parts along with engines . AIRBUS IS THE BEST!!!!!!!!!
he was a son of a german immigrant but was born in the usa. his name is written Böing. when u dont have the letter ö on your keyboard u can also use oe.
FSFreaks thats not what lucas means search up the percentage of aircrafts made and percentage that have had an accident boeing has a higher crash percentage
My favorite Boeing planes: the 727 and 747 as I flew many of those. I do not like the 737 not better then a Mercure (which I flew). My favorite Airbuses: A320, A350 and A380. I really think flying the A380 was awesome but for flight quality, I the A350 offers the best experience.
I like both companies some aircraft more than others all depends on operators configurations. Love Singapore 777 business. Love the A380 Emirates business. Not a fan of 737’ as lost all confidence especially after negligence from Boeing in not correcting the issue that downed the Lion Air and then Ethiopian Max. I recently cancelled some flights I had booked on the Max just before they were grounded. No way was I getting on that plane and that’s the first time I’ve ever had to cancel owing to a very real fear of the aircrafts flaws.
The main thing that was wrong was Pilot training on how to recognize and correct these failures. The system was working correctly responding to the inputs the problem was failure of senors and then knowing what to do next.
@Willy Pilot training had everything to do with it. Does not matter how experienced or how many hours you have if the training is inadequate or faulty. For some reason the Pilots were not able to understand the fault and take corrective action. This was a recoverable incident made worse by the Pilot/Pilots not taking the proper actions. You can turn off power to the Horizontal Stabilizer Jack Screw and it can be adjusted manually. No matter what MCAS does it can't turn it on again. These switches are centrally located in easy reach of both Pilots. If a Pilot does not how to recover from a systems failure that is Training Fault.
Please make a video on air india .. it's a very old Arline company ..Almost 85 years old..It was once one of the best airline in the world and now it has lost all its glory and reputation .. and is also has a great bebt and a lot of political plays involved in it .. but guess what no matter how bad air india is ..It always makes history..!. Air india conducted the world's biggest international evacuation program for more than 45 days and saved millions and millions.. it flew all the way from new Delhi to US with full women Crew .. starting from the ATC, to the pilots , to cabin crew to the ground handling workers .. entire crew were women on the occasion of international women's day .. was also the flew the longest flight untill singapore airlines over took it very recently
Boeing: Old man; suffered more bruises in his lifetime so far Airbus: Teenager; suffered fewer bruises in his lifetime so far. You get what I mean? I prefer Airbus btw
The Airbus head office is at Toulouse in France and its origins are much older with original company producing the Caravelle and other Aircraft. They might use the Netherlands for a Tax Haven but that is all
General Electric is a global company which uses human resources from all around the world. A lot of european and asian engineers are working on GE aircraft engines. But you are right, GE probably makes one of the best aircraft engines in the world.
Because you'd end up with a dog of a plane that has aerodynamic instability that needs to be solved by software that would lead to literal crashes. Hmm, now where have I heard that story recently?????
what would make you think that it isn't? You can't really tell as it's behind an Air France A340 (in Air France livery) and you can't see its engines...
I dont i Despise those Greedy Corporate Fuckers that rather have Profits over safety, I Love Airbus over Boeing anyday, In Bus i Trust i go with no Fuss, Max 8 No thrust there is NO Trust !!!!
I like airplanes that don't crash.
Johnny Yeah so I’d rather pick Airbus👌👌👌
Or at least planes that can crashland allmost everywhere without killing all and everyone inside.
Any Plane Could Crash Someday, It Normally Does Not Depend on the Plane, But the Pilots (excluding 737 MAX).
@@sheereenaali8448 737 MAX destroyed in seconds
737: I fly safe!
737 max: I WANT TO F*CKING DIE
Fun fact: the Airbus A300 is the only passenger jet in history to be hit by a ground to air missile and still land safely
MWB Gaming it was technically a cargo jet
Iran Air 665 an A300 was shot down by a surface to air middle and 290 people died. It’s more about the missile and less about the airplane.
@@Lyxzzzzzzzzzzzzz1 technically yes, but it was a passenger plane first
@@christophercarillo6342 I guess, but it took a direct hit to the wing, cracked the rear spar and was still able to land
Gotta admit, that's one tough bird
@@christophercarillo6342 You're thinking of the wrong flight, it was a DHL aircraft that was struck in the wing by a SAM, the aircraft lost all hydraulic pressure and the wing was on fire, yet they still managed to land, although they skidded off the runway into a minefield.
if you want to do comparisons then use charts or tables or basically anything that will make things visually more representable...side by side...
Was just about to write this too. I just kept getting lost by the speel. Do an Edit.
oh you're so perfect
I was about to say the same thing!
That's why I gave dislike
The plural of "Aircraft" is "Aircraft", not "Aircrafts"
Really?
Okay.
Nice.
Learnt something :)
@@davidliu2243 hotel? Trivago
devraj changkakati just...stop.
Goes to show this guy running this channel has no idea about aviation. It was painful to watch this at some points XD
mezsh haha 😂
Boy you've got half of your video's facts wrong
Annoyingly wrong. And missing some key information. Very US-skewed, shame its not balanced!
just look at that kid that so desperately tries to impress a wrong audience with his skateboarder outlook and gestures.
You expected balanced data... even facts? :)
First of all, Boeing did not make the f 18 or F 15, it simply bought McDonnell Douglas, and owns them, but it did not make them.
Same with the A 64.
Thank you, finally someone who thinks the same.😀
Well he's not an aviation nut soo
@@SpellOfSin well he still was supposed to do his research
Same with the C-17 its not a Boeing its a MD , Boeing never Built them only Bought them out and calling it a Boeing
I was also reading some BS article that the F18 is dangerous because one exploded in Australia. But that explosion was completely due to a GE engine
I prefer Airbus, simply because of the fact that where I live, I fly everywhere in either the A320 or the B737 nad A320 feels roomier, probably because it is wider, and a bit more refined.
Not going to mention any Douglas aircraft.... immediately goes on to mention f-15 and f-18s 😂
DC-10 😂
Alexander Collier he said that Douglas merged with Boeing sooo
His attention to detail leaves a lot to be desired... For example, the Lunar Rover was developed jointly by Boeing and General Motors...
@@Paolo-sw8ys On discovery there was a entire documentary about the Apollo program.
In episode 4 the explorers the lunar rover is mentioned 23:30
th-cam.com/video/IildAmV2l64/w-d-xo.html
@@charlieh1006 He Said He will Not Talk About McDonnell Douglas Aircraft.
The F-15, F/A-18, C-17 and F/A-18E/F were Already In Production When Boeing Acquired them.
A few additions, Airbus is head quartered in France, the main owners are the French, German and Spanish states with together 30% of the shares.
And it's a damned good thing there is competition, both Airbus and Boeing have factories around the world. Boeing was originally Böeing and a German immigrant to the US. Eventually they will have to compete with the Chinese too.
Had to add that they both produce fine aircraft.
good information but you could also write those numbers and fact instead just speaking endless
need to fill time with blabla so he gets it monetized from youtooble
otherwise a single spreadsheet would have done the trick
Airbus has overall been the more comfortable planes to be on for me.
They are less noisy in the cabin. Especially in the A380
@@JJJT- And the a350 has far more leg room than the 787 and is quieter, the 787's fuselage creeps into the legroom allot if you get a window seat, I agree the a380 is almost silent.
I find that Airbus planes are a bit more stable in flight during light turbulence (particularly clear air turbulence) due to the advanced flight computers being able to compensate for it before the plane actually starts to move (I have seen the ailerons flapping all over the place and the plane doesn't really move that much), same for windshear compensation
But for heavier turbulence, the more flexible wings that Boeing is known for usually provides a smoother ride
Which plane, depends on the pilot. The main difference for the pilot is that each different plane cockpit configuration for Boeing is different but with Airbus they are all the same so the pilot can jump from one cokpit to another different plane and all the controls are in the same place, a big selling point as less training is needed.
But with the different wingspans, pilots can misjudge their wingspan causing wingstrikes during taxi, or fuel leaks and explosions as well
@@supportmanualflying2224 Which I believe never happened and when taxying the pilot follow a line on the ground.
@@jejewa2763 Check this out: th-cam.com/video/eKJStVLxkHg/w-d-xo.html
That may change after the MAX situation.
Jame M
Boeing:only some people died, come back
Airbus: happy that people died in a Boeing
To compare a Airbus 300 to a 737 is a total joke. They support two different markets and route structure.
What do you expect from a channel that's not dedicated 100 percent to aviation.. Go watch skyships eng
yeah I was like wtf is he talking about
737 vs A320 would have been a better comparison
And comparing the A300 to the 767 would have been more appropriate
This guy has no idea, comparing apples to oranges.
There is no plural of aircraft, made me cringe every time you said it.
me too
1. I thought I misheard.
2. Read your comment.
3. Bye, I’m gone.
Thanks. I couldn’t have suffered anymore.
Aircrafts are my favorite subject it reminds me of the time I brought 2 goldfishes and 2 sheeps onboard.
Me personally, I would appreciate a little less showmanship / selfdisplay and therefore a little more facts. Almost 13 minutes just to state, that those two companies have different histories and quite similar product families, that's a waste of my time.
You come off as a bitter old man who hates to see youngsters suceed. Don't hate, ccongratuate, yo!
For me - this was a rather irritating comparison of dissimilar company groups. one perhaps being involved in rather too much and one that sticks to the knitting. A comparison of like with like would actually have been very interesting. Oh and just in case your program might be seen in Europe do remember that there the only humans who wear caps back to front are five and six year olds pretending to be cool. Adults wearing them like that frankly do not come across as, shall we say 'knowledgeable'.
@@Repented008 oh, so you judge by the avatar picture :-)
this is not "sucseeding" it is bullshitting.
Since when do we measure succsess in amount of bullshit per minute?
If this kid would have developed a new plane engine using less fuel, and beeing more reliable - that i would call success
- but that still seem to be the domain of bitter old men ;)
747 for life
A380 for life !!!
Hahahaha “Mt. Rainer” totally butchered that one boss 😂🤦🏻♂️, it’s Mt. Rainier!
Airbus is for life
Amen to that :)
Finally something without india and pakistan in it.
At 9:20 while talking about Boeings contribution to space, you actually show a satellite made by Airbus. It’s the Galileo IOV satellite for the European GPS equivalent.
One by-pass safety for profit and the other one doesn’t - Aircraft tech & engineers
AIRBUS IS BETTER AND SAFER, BOEING IS NOT GOING AND FAR MORE DANGEROUS THESE DAYS I AM SURE EVERYONE HEARD SO AIRBUS FOR ME ALL DAY EVERYDAY !!!!
also a FAA that is for nationalistic reasons in bed with the nations company boing -
and all that MAGA protectionist bullshit going on in the states that make boing a dangerous company, they completely relying on market-/shareholder/-autoregulation.
Airbus on the other hand is a multinational company, and so far - the euro authorities are less corrupt when it comes to certifying and inspecting.
thats the whole "secret" no one seem want to talk about.
good lord mate way to brag about it and most likely you said all of this because the 737 max accidents and then said Boeing is the worst company ever. is this correct
I love the airbus a380 and I love all Airbus airplanes.
It's crazy to think, that I'm going to start my internship at Airbus this year🤯
Are you an intern in Airbus right now?If so,Congrats and I hope you will be hired to work there
how has it been so far?
@@bq-9238 It's great! Cool colleagues, great boss, interesting stuff to learn...only Corvid-19 is a doozy😕
that’s great to hear. have fun.
After 737 max accidents Boing has a lot of work to do to reinstall confidence in its product.
I don't think they can win mine back. Why?
1. They didn't properly inform and train pilots. It is reported that there is no mention of the MCAS in the flight manuals of the plane.
2. They made the warning light an extra. It's literally essential.
3. All of this problem was because they instead of building the airplane from scratch used an old airplane to fit in new and bigger engines that the airplane was not design for. They were cheap and these people payed for it.
4. Boeing did much of the work in certifying the plane instead of the FAA. Just so it could be faster the approval process.
4. And even after they knew all of this they blamed the customer for the 1st crash. The second crash could have been avoided if they didn't have blamed the first crash on the customer and had fixed the software/plane right away.
Rui Terra Yes I think mine too, it’s too risky, this is our lives we are talking about not a sum of money or a few days work, from now on if it is Boeing I will not fly or change company to a one that uses Airbus.
Rui Terra Good points. The only thing I know for sure is that I will not travel on this death plane.
Did you see the news today? The preliminary report shows that the pilots followed the exact procedure that Boeing said the pilots “should have done”, and yet the plane still activated nose dive function into the ground? There is so much wrong with this aircraft.
I'll still fly on the 737NG series but I will definitely not be stepping foot onto a 737 MAX unless I am hog-tied and dragged on board
Jasonsenipor Fake news media like CNN is full of centrists, not leftists.
The real difference is that one makes planes that don’t fall out of the sky.
The biggest difference is the US market which is the most profitable restricts Airbus just like it restricted Concorde which was a fantastic aircraft the most reliable safe supersonic passenger aircraft ever. If the US didn't restrict airbus you'd see 380's in every major US airport. Instead of airbus ceasing to build another fantastic jet
I love the A380!
Interesting piece on these air vehicles. Good to see FTD back on track with actually informative and fun videos.
You missed one really important difference between the two manufacturers: Automation versus hand flying.
Boeing aircraft typically use flight yokes, whereas Airbus aircraft use little joysticks, known as side sticks.
Boeing flight yokes are typically designed to give tactile feedback to the pilots, whereas Airbus side sticks do not.
Boeing aircraft are meant to be flown first, and automation second, whereas Airbus aircraft are designed to fly themselves, with the pilots monitoring the systems.
This is why the 737 MAX has been so disastrous for Boeing, because they have never created such a system before, whereas Airbus has been doing this for over 20 years, and has paid for those lessons in blood.
This begs the question why Boeing didn't take advantage of Airbus's missteps; in 2010 an Airbus A320 crashed during a test flight by an airline, when two of the three AOA sensors frozen in place at the same time, due to improper washing procedures. The flight computer ignored the working sensor, incorrectly diagnosing the faulty sensors. The plane crashed, because the pilots were too low to the ground to figure this out and to recover.
And just to think that Boeing only used one AOA sensor for the MCAS system... even Airbus was smart enough to use three before the 2010 crash.
isnt it a bit ironic, manufacturer who resents automation gets bankrupt due to faulty automation
Loop IF they do; they've got tons of lines of businesses and aircraft to fall back on. But it is ironic all the same.
They tried to pull an Airbus, without studying one's automation line-by-line, component-by-component, and reviewing all the safety investigations over the past three decades to have an idea on how to do it.
Had they done so, the twin 737 MAX crashes would have never happened.
As a passenger of many years I used to be a big fan of Boeing but have found that later variants of Airbus aircraft are much smoother, roomier(I think they are wider)quieter to fly in, especially the A380 which is fantastic aircraft for long haul.
Agreed, in general Boeing aircraft are much noisier than their Airbus counterparts. However the noisiest I have ever traveled on was an old Iran Air Tupolev 134 - nasty!!
@@poruatokin The only Russian plane Ive flown on was on Aeroflot from Bangkok to London via Moscow in 1973, not sure what aircaraft it was but it looked like VC10. I think someone in the British aircraft industry was leaking all the plans to Russia, same with Concordski......
@@cliffbartle3772 Sounds like it was an Ilyushin IL-62.
There were many rumors at the time about the TU-144 blueprint origins but I believe they were debunked many years later. Later, the leading conspiracy theory was that the Concorde team "leaked" a deliberately flawed set of designs to the Soviets to hinder their progress.
My dream job is to be a pilot, and i want to fly the airbus a350 1000
Same. Delta Airlines
Good luck!
:)
Thx
Airbus's headquarters are in Toulouse, France.
Thunderworks My city and Airbus is everywhere
ill never fly on a Boeing Max ever.. i did flew in Mexico on a new Airbus ... quiet, comfortable and fast loved it had such a good time... love how theyre design is not a flaw... unlike Max is a total flaw they basically screwed the 747 and tried to fix it with one sensor.
Zuri Lopez well the max isn’t based off the 747...
@@SidestickPilot when you think about it they were murder by machines.... Terminator Judgement day is not a joke
B777 for life!!!
It's like Bombardier and Embraer are always in competition with each other
But unlike Boeing vs Airbus (who are mostly just raking in the profits)
Those 2 companies are actually competing
They would if they are not on the brim of existence.
Airbus I like the Airbus A 380 and the A350 too
I want video about *ILLUMINATI* I did some research by myself but didn't get it.
It was a group of scienctists who were supporting the fact that sun is in the center of the solar system but christians did not like it causing there killings and causing heavy retaliation from illuminati(the enlightened one or the knowledgeable people) but all their books have been destroyed and some stored in the christian archives in vatican basically christian did a genocide like they did of the jews
Selena Rose basically illuminati is an extremist secret society of zoinest, zoinism is an extremist group from the religion judaism, currently they hold the world bank under their control they hold music and film industries all around the world of every country, and pay them to promote their illuminati’s agenda, which is to brain wash the little kids by cartoons and super heroes movies and try to engage other people from music...!! They want the total control on the entire world and they want to put their one/new world order and wanna make other people to their slaves and wanna reduces world population, coz their agenda is, least population easy control and the other last thing they believe in lucifer is their god and dajjal is their messiah...!! Hope you’ll understand just try to make more research!!
When u mention that boeing has made the F15 and FA18 u could also mention that airbus former companies like Aerospatiale (france) and Messerschmitt Bölkow Blohm (germany) made a lot of firsts and impressive Airplanes like the Concorde or the Me 262. Then there is a history of Airbus nearly as long as Boeing is around.
with the difference that Boeing actually produce(d) the F-15 and F/A-18.
@@pauldurlacher2217 They dont all the development constructing and further went on when these plants were Mc Donnel Douglas even the F15 strike eagle was made by MD. Even the Boeing 717 was a Blueprint of MD.
I never said that Boeing developed amy of the mentioned planes. I was just saying that Boeing produce(d) them in the factories they acquired from MD.
@@pauldurlacher2217 The F-15, The F/A-18, C-17 and F/A-18E/F Were in Production When Boeing Acquired McDonnell Douglas.
Airbus for me but I do like the 747 700/800
If you want to Live Fly Airbus, If you Want to Die Fly Boeing the Choice is yours, I know who i rather lay my life with !!!
@Basya Bas LOL
Rofl
If it's a Boeing, I ain't going.
Wow! So clever! It's almost like I haven't heard that one a million times.. jeez. Get clever or go home buddy. As good as Airbus is.. they will never have the legacy and revolutionary design that Boeing has achieved in its 100 plus years. Airbus wouldn't exist without Boeing. Boeing standardized and invented many of the aviation engineering techniques used today. So you can love Airbus all you want. But don't undervalue what Boeing has done for aviation because Airbus doesn't even come close to the achievements of Boeing.
ALA 100% agreed. Although I’m a bit biased here lol
Not 70%, roughly 50-55%. Depending on where that person lives.
Stay at home then.
Boeing is the leader
Total bollocks - Airbus commercial are located in Toulouse, France - I should know, my son works there - do your research.
The official headquarter is in Leiden/ Netherlands. Call it tax haven or just a place not in France and Germany. Toulouse might be the largest facility. But that's another story. I know, this is hard to accept for a French
@@thomashausner6962 You're citing the seat of the Airbus Group, which is a holding with several divisions (helicopters, military and space technology operations) plus various other shares. Was formerly known as EADS.
Airbus S.A.S., the Airbus Group division that builds the Airbus planes (and which is older as an organization than the
holding owning it) has its seat in Toulouse.
@@thomashausner6962 dude, it's hard to accept for you, but "Toulouse is the home of Airbus headquarters", "Airbus headquarters are located in the southwest region of Occitanie, near the Toulouse-Blagnac Airport", this comes from the official website of Airbus.
My fav
Airbus : A350 and A380
Boeing: 777-9x and 747-8
The 787 is a good aircraft
My fave
Boeing: 737-800, 747-400 and 767-200
Airbus: A321, A320 and A330-300
Airbus is good
Not as good as...
Bombardier JK
We need a 3rd entity international commercial plane with Russian technology and we need to call it LetayushchiyKot
Boeing and airbus are like apple and samsung always rivaling against eachother😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I would take the A340 any day.
12 min video with 4 ads lol come on dude. be logical
what a dumb comment lol "at least he get ad revenu" ... no shit bob lol
I’m a Boeing person myself
If it's Boeing,I a'int Going! Proud AirBus fan
You forgot bell boing plane-helicopter and boing starliner capsule for astronauts by the end of this year maybe and the end of the A380...
right, Boeing is supposed to have more experience how to construct safe airplanes. The performance of the 747 was simply awesome, actually, all Boeing models did well. Airbus is like the little brother, they were under pressure not to make any mistake because Boeing was already dominating and if they did the slightest plunder they would be out forever. Since approx 25% of people have slight degrees of fear of flying (aviophobia, affects just 6.5 percent), the aviation industry is mainly about safety in flight.
Boeing have more experience come on ! ,same can be said of car makers but look at what Boeing has done with 737 what a serious balls up ,cancelled orders because they said they added a feature making it look like a slight upgrade when they made a drastic change this avoided new model ATS full approval,now many hundreds of innocence people lost their lives.RIP.OH Airbus use Rolls Royce jet engines the safest in the world.
@@vincentmullins6607 Didn't Singapore Airlines just ground their 787s due to the shitty RR engines?
@@oranges866 Limited blade issues, true .My point is Boeing knew they cut a corner on 737 and most likely ruined a good aircraft ,and not having the new equipment training.Why Rolls Royce used inferior blades has to be stupid to. Loss of life is the same for every family, no excuses.
@@vincentmullins6607 Wasn't really a cut corner, more an expensive disaster.
@@oranges866 Yes 100 % correct
Airbus all the way if u want to live
Boeing is better chick
Agreed 100% well said
@@carmelosevilla6696 Bitch Pls Yeah Better at Crashing and killing People, Airbus dont do that though so Airbus is way better and safer than any Boeing thats not going today !!!! and OH yeah Boeing is Better on the ground too when it don't fly
It’s are opinion ok
@@TheAirplanejunkie your a dick
Airbus makes better aircraft. Compare 737 and A320, I flew on both types and found the A320 to be more comfortable .
One major difference which is observable is the landing speed. The A320 approaches and lands at slower speed and just requires wheel brakes without reverse thrust to slow down. Really comfortable landing.
The 737 has much faster approaching speed and when it touches down, the reverse thrust seem to be on full throttle to slow it down. You can actually feel being thrown forward as this happens.
Perhaps why many 737 skid off the runway during landing in bad weather is because of this.
Aaron Richard reversers do very little if anything on normal and dry days. 737 and 320 both mostly use wheel brakes. Both are fantastic aircraft and approach speed is more based on a companies SOP then the aircraft.
i love any airplans
Honestly due to the many companies boeing acquired and not to mention boeings experience and the companies they acquired too experiences boeing will always remain top aircraft manufacturer
You clearly need to look into the lineage of Airbus. Just from the UK side their history can be traced back through companies such as Hawker and its predecessors to pre-1920.
@@poruatokin same with france and germany
Why didn't you mentioned anything about airbus 380 double decker plane which can accommodate over 500 people
A380*
@@sanadpradhan1596 yeah right
853 passengers in a 1 class layout I believe.
It's difficult watching anyone who can't figure out the correct way to wear a cap :)
Boeing makes so much better airplanes than Airbus! My favourite Boeing plane is 787-10
Not really. The 737-Max is a complete failure with 2 crashes in 4 months due to Boeing and the FAA overlooking basic aerodynamics with the new engine replacements going above the wings and the new autopilot adjustment sensor systems not having a backup when it fails. (which was what caused the 2 crashes already). Airbus' neo series has some of the most advanced and safe systems and also have some of the most luxurious cabins in existence. I like Boeing, but considering the corruption of them with the FAA, I don't think they can be trusted so easily anymore.
Boeing!!
Their design philosophy is quite different. Airbus puts the computer in control with the pilot as a monitor, and in many situations the pilots can not override the computer controlling the airplane. Boeing always gives the pilot the ability to have final authority, with one note able exception, the B737Max, which is being revised to allow pilot over ride as we speak. Pilots fly Boeings and use computers systems to assist at their discretion. Computers fly Airbus aircraft with pilots providing computer inputs. In an Airbus, the computer has final authority. An early A300 demonstrator crashed at an air show during a low level fly by because it had not been programmed to do such a maneuver. The engineers had said "why would you ever want to do that? If you are that low and slow you are going to land." Which the computer did, only there was no runway there. I'm an engineer, and you just can't think of and program around every situation that can arise. You can get most of them , but not all of them. I'll take a Mark One brain as the final authority all day long, and the B737Max will emerge from the dark side soon.
it was actually an a 320 and the pilots who were barely trained on the a320 shut down some of the computer which other systems were referring too. which caused a minor failure. At the end u can shut down the computers and fly it perfectly on your own.
Love Airbus
Finallt #FTD is back on track.. Really good and informative video.. keep it up :-)
And yet, Airbus is ending A380 production, well below the sales that Airbus projected. The 747-8 will continue production as a freighter.
Air France is reducing its A380 fleet, because there aren't enough routes that can fill that large of a plane profitably.
The premise is that companies are battling each other. Not so fast. In telephone, early patents allowed the Bell System to quickly take 80% of the nation's present and future networks. GTE invented the phone dialer and was able to secure it's own 15% of the nation's phone market. What was left were the mountainous and desert areas which made service more expensive and less reliable. GTE's reputation suffered. Telco engineers knew otherwise. Both Airbus and Boeing will continue to lead in aerospace engineering projects, world wide. Cast of 1,000s.
can you do 10 facts about syria?
-christianity started in syria
-bread was first ever made in syria
-the first music note was found in syria
-alphabit was first ever found in ougaret in west syria
-damascus is the oldest capital in the world
-aleppo is the oldest City in the world
-syria origin is not arabian but actually syrianic
and more sure
U just fucked up the Greek and indus valley history because of some points but yeah syria was one hell of a country before terrorism fucked it up
dont forget Emperor Hezekiah prayed to the God of Abraham Isaac Ishmael for help and destroyed the huge conquering Assyrian army as well overnight!
Christianity did not start anywhere it has always been
Aleppo is not the oldest city in the world
It is Jericho
Mount rainer 😂😂😂 dude has me dying
I know, Right! ... Mt. Rayn'r ???
airbus because not a single airplane manufactured by airbus has crashed due to manufacturing or engineering default. Its planes are the safest. Its also has more advanced autopilots and other parts along with engines . AIRBUS IS THE BEST!!!!!!!!!
1. Fun fact: Boeing was a German.
2. Best Aircraft: A350-900 XWB
he was a son of a german immigrant but was born in the usa. his name is written Böing. when u dont have the letter ö on your keyboard u can also use oe.
Boeing, Airbus
Apple, Samsung
Google, Internet Explorer
**Rolox, Minecraft**
Pewdiepie, T-Series
Apple microsoft
Rolox
Airbus all the way for safety 👍🏻
Lucas Tant Airbus just as safe as Boeing You only think it is different due to the 737 max problems Boeing has right now.
Both are safe
Yup, airbus has Ecams that tell pilots what to do and isolate when problems come. So accidents are avoided most of the time.
Tupelov planes are safer than both
Jk
FSFreaks thats not what lucas means search up the percentage of aircrafts made and percentage that have had an accident boeing has a higher crash percentage
My favorite airplane of all time is the Concorde
Smh.
Airbus: toulouse France
Boeing: Seattle Washington
Airbus or EADS is in the netherlands due to tax evation reasons. but airbus HQ (the passenger airplane manufacturer) is in toulouse.
I honestly adore this channel. Can we have newly discovered facts about our oceans, please?
This channel will probably tell you that airbus created the oceans of the world.
Please do one on the MH370
Thk you for choosing malaysia airlnes
Hopefully without the missiles this time
Now Boeing Is understandable
1.09. Okay so lets jump right into the facts, before i do that be sure to like the video.............
My favorite Boeing planes: the 727 and 747 as I flew many of those. I do not like the 737 not better then a Mercure (which I flew). My favorite Airbuses: A320, A350 and A380. I really think flying the A380 was awesome but for flight quality, I the A350 offers the best experience.
Airbus A320neo vs Boeing 737-800 max
Geneross Cajepe well for starters only one of them is flying right now
there is no plural for aircraft
Non aviator: look at those aircrafts
Aviator: look at those planes
Concorde=airbus
No
AIRBUS IS BETTER BOEING MAKES MORE MONEY BUT AIRBUS PLANES CAN FLY BOEING CANT
airbus have had their issues as well.
@FATE_ ASS2SS1N Boeing has been around a lot longer and has built a lot more aircraft.
Everyone has issues.
I like both companies some aircraft more than others all depends on operators configurations. Love Singapore 777 business. Love the A380 Emirates business. Not a fan of 737’ as lost all confidence especially after negligence from Boeing in not correcting the issue that downed the Lion Air and then Ethiopian Max. I recently cancelled some flights I had booked on the Max just before they were grounded. No way was I getting on that plane and that’s the first time I’ve ever had to cancel owing to a very real fear of the aircrafts flaws.
The main thing that was wrong was Pilot training on how to recognize and correct these failures. The system was working correctly responding to the inputs the problem was failure of senors and then knowing what to do next.
@Willy Pilot training had everything to do with it. Does not matter how experienced or how many hours you have if the training is inadequate or faulty. For some reason the Pilots were not able to understand the fault and take corrective action. This was a recoverable incident made worse by the Pilot/Pilots not taking the proper actions. You can turn off power to the Horizontal Stabilizer Jack Screw and it can be adjusted manually. No matter what MCAS does it can't turn it on again. These switches are centrally located in easy reach of both Pilots. If a Pilot does not how to recover from a systems failure that is Training Fault.
@Willy 1st you turn off Stabilizer Trim. The computer can do what ever it wants there is no power to the jack screw. Then recover control.
@@richb313 Well its emerged that that's not true anymore...
so what are the differences between Boeing and Airbus?
Airbus fixes the problems with their planes in a timely manner
Boeing uses a yoke, Airbus uses a side stick.
The difference.............On Airbus you fly. On Boeing you die.
I love the 747-8
And the A 380
All aircraft are awesome!
👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
✌🏻️🇨🇭 greetings from Switzerland 🇨🇭✌🏻️
Michael Wolf stop
I respect you my friend.
From Singapore btw
cuz why not
idk.
I like boeing because it is much safer and faster than airbus
Best plane I have ever been is 777..
ThePuliUkko Lucky you weren’t on the MH370! 😱
Me too!, the landing gear is impressive!
Airbus all the way
Please make a video on air india .. it's a very old Arline company ..Almost 85 years old..It was once one of the best airline in the world and now it has lost all its glory and reputation .. and is also has a great bebt and a lot of political plays involved in it .. but guess what no matter how bad air india is ..It always makes history..!. Air india conducted the world's biggest international evacuation program for more than 45 days and saved millions and millions.. it flew all the way from new Delhi to US with full women Crew .. starting from the ATC, to the pilots , to cabin crew to the ground handling workers .. entire crew were women on the occasion of international women's day .. was also the flew the longest flight untill singapore airlines over took it very recently
One crashes more than the other lmao
Boeing:
Old man; suffered more bruises in his lifetime so far
Airbus:
Teenager; suffered fewer bruises in his lifetime so far.
You get what I mean?
I prefer Airbus btw
The Airbus head office is at Toulouse in France and its origins are much older with original company producing the Caravelle and other Aircraft.
They might use the Netherlands for a Tax Haven but that is all
Make facts on Prince Fazza!
best engine of airplane made by European General Electric, Rolls-Royce Trent use for Boeing and airbus
But GE is american
General Electric is a global company which uses human resources from all around the world. A lot of european and asian engineers are working on GE aircraft engines. But you are right, GE probably makes one of the best aircraft engines in the world.
@@allesundallgemein7411 RR is British
I like the RR Trent XWB Engine like OMG that sound is Music to my Ears and so is the GE90 oh yessssssss
Losing the iconic 747 is such a shame, the shape will always be my favourite, why not modernise the 747 keeping the shape
because there is no need for such a big plane and it would be really expensive to redesign everything
@@lucianistoc1264 no need for a big plane, bro the airbus is massive
Because you'd end up with a dog of a plane that has aerodynamic instability that needs to be solved by software that would lead to literal crashes. Hmm, now where have I heard that story recently?????
@@hive71recordinz89 that's why it's slowly dying
"MT Rainer"? NO! "Mt RainEER!"
7:53
I'm pretty sure that last aircraft(on the ground) is not an A330.
what would make you think that it isn't? You can't really tell as it's behind an Air France A340 (in Air France livery) and you can't see its engines...
To be honest I really like Boeing aircraft.
I dont i Despise those Greedy Corporate Fuckers that rather have Profits over safety, I Love Airbus over Boeing anyday, In Bus i Trust i go with no Fuss, Max 8 No thrust there is NO Trust !!!!
I'm all with ya Boeing is amazing