For 10% OFF with MJJC use code: "UNS4NRB7" at checkout: ► MJJC Foam Cannon S v3.0: www.mjjc.com/collections/foam-cannon/foam-cannon-s-v3/?ref=roadtodetailing ► MJJC Foam Cannon Pro 2.0: www.mjjc.com/collections/foam-cannon/foam-cannon-pro/?ref=roadtodetailing ►MJJC Shampoo and review:th-cam.com/video/vQlXbKk0j9I/w-d-xo.html
I have a few months of experience with the S v3.0 and a few years with the Pro v2.0 and I have to say, the reservoir of the Pro holds up much better. It resists the chemicals with ease, whilst the S v3.0's reservoir started to give in already and developed a bump on the bottom, so it doesn't stand straight any longer and it wobbles on the floor. The Pro v2.0 is far more superior all together, IMHO.
Thank you for sharing your valuable insights and experience Zsolt, I really appreciate your input as always 🙌 I haven’t experienced such things just yet, but will keep my eye on it. I’m curious about the new Pro 3.0, and I guess that’s going to be the new crown holder once that will hit the market. Pro 2.0 is awesome and I really like the S v3.0 as well. Both are great choices, even though they have their own pros and cons, and I’m really looking forward to their love child 🤩
Just from the video here, I like V2 better because the tighter nozzle adjustment prevents my setting from getting bumped. And the smaller size fits on my cabinet shelves easier. Of course V3 has the improvements listed on the box.
Hi Eric, thanks for your input. You see!? This is why I always say: “personal preference” is key whatever product we are talking about. I personally don’t like the pro 2.0’s stiffness. The S v3.0 however is still stiff, just not as much. The Pro 2.0 is a very solid piece of kit still, so you don’t really go wrong with either of them. At the end of the day both have their own pros and cons, so the end user will choose which one is the better for their preferences. Thanks for watching mate 🙌
Very good demonstrations there, thanks. The 2.0 and 3.0 are so close really. I have read many comments about them not able produce a thin enough foam. My take on that would be to buy a thin snowfoam. With that said, id love to hear your take on the mjjc with BH Autofoam (if you have any left). In my head, that could be an absolute winner. of a combo. Also, could you try the mjjc with your Worx Hydroshot? The generic one with a 1.1 orifice did not work for me. Cheers!
Thank you mate! Yep, there are many users whose unsatisfied with MJJC because it can be too thick, heavy and dry. It needs a little bit of playing if you would like to have a "wetter" kind foam, that known to be the best for cleaning abilities. In my opinion, it can produce that with no issues, while offer a better density for thinner foams, IF needed. I personally don't use BH AF nor Touch less, as I don't have the need for it. During the winter time, I use an APC and cover that with a snow foam really. But as you say, it might work well together with an MJJC lance. However, you will still need some time to adjust the foam lance according to the density you are after. I don't have the Hydroshot anymore, I gifted to one of my family member. The generic should work, but try to adjust the top little by little. I remember that I hardly find the perfect settings at first, then once I spent a little time I could adjust it to the Hydroshot and it provided enough foam. Start from zero, then start spraying and turn the top very slowly. Also make sure, you are in not ECO mode on the Hydroshot. Hope this helps, Viktor
very good comparison, i would definitely go for the MJJC pro v2. did you do the test with an electric washer or petrol one? and which orifice did you use? i heard smaller orifice is better for weaker electric washer and bigger one for stronger petrol ones.
Thank you! I used a Karcher K4 compact pressure washer and both MJJC had the wider, 1.25mm orifice installed. I wouldn’t suggest the 1.1mm for anything more powerful than a K2 to be honest, there is no need for that. :)
Hi Horatio! Yes, I am Hungarian 🙌 My accent is pretty strange in general, as well as including the main Hungarian accent accords 😅 Well spotted! Thanks for tuning in mate, Viktor
![ละลาย (LALALYE) - DAOU PITTAYA ต้าห์อู๋ พิทยา [OFFICIAL MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wo6r9TgausI/mqdefault.jpg)
For 10% OFF with MJJC use code: "UNS4NRB7" at checkout:
► MJJC Foam Cannon S v3.0: www.mjjc.com/collections/foam-cannon/foam-cannon-s-v3/?ref=roadtodetailing
► MJJC Foam Cannon Pro 2.0: www.mjjc.com/collections/foam-cannon/foam-cannon-pro/?ref=roadtodetailing
►MJJC Shampoo and review:th-cam.com/video/vQlXbKk0j9I/w-d-xo.html
I have a few months of experience with the S v3.0 and a few years with the Pro v2.0 and I have to say, the reservoir of the Pro holds up much better. It resists the chemicals with ease, whilst the S v3.0's reservoir started to give in already and developed a bump on the bottom, so it doesn't stand straight any longer and it wobbles on the floor. The Pro v2.0 is far more superior all together, IMHO.
Thank you for sharing your valuable insights and experience Zsolt, I really appreciate your input as always 🙌 I haven’t experienced such things just yet, but will keep my eye on it. I’m curious about the new Pro 3.0, and I guess that’s going to be the new crown holder once that will hit the market. Pro 2.0 is awesome and I really like the S v3.0 as well. Both are great choices, even though they have their own pros and cons, and I’m really looking forward to their love child 🤩
Just from the video here, I like V2 better because the tighter nozzle adjustment prevents my setting from getting bumped. And the smaller size fits on my cabinet shelves easier. Of course V3 has the improvements listed on the box.
Hi Eric, thanks for your input. You see!? This is why I always say: “personal preference” is key whatever product we are talking about. I personally don’t like the pro 2.0’s stiffness. The S v3.0 however is still stiff, just not as much. The Pro 2.0 is a very solid piece of kit still, so you don’t really go wrong with either of them. At the end of the day both have their own pros and cons, so the end user will choose which one is the better for their preferences. Thanks for watching mate 🙌
Very good demonstrations there, thanks.
The 2.0 and 3.0 are so close really. I have read many comments about them not able produce a thin enough foam. My take on that would be to buy a thin snowfoam. With that said, id love to hear your take on the mjjc with BH Autofoam (if you have any left). In my head, that could be an absolute winner. of a combo.
Also, could you try the mjjc with your Worx Hydroshot? The generic one with a 1.1 orifice did not work for me.
Cheers!
Thank you mate! Yep, there are many users whose unsatisfied with MJJC because it can be too thick, heavy and dry. It needs a little bit of playing if you would like to have a "wetter" kind foam, that known to be the best for cleaning abilities. In my opinion, it can produce that with no issues, while offer a better density for thinner foams, IF needed.
I personally don't use BH AF nor Touch less, as I don't have the need for it. During the winter time, I use an APC and cover that with a snow foam really. But as you say, it might work well together with an MJJC lance. However, you will still need some time to adjust the foam lance according to the density you are after.
I don't have the Hydroshot anymore, I gifted to one of my family member. The generic should work, but try to adjust the top little by little. I remember that I hardly find the perfect settings at first, then once I spent a little time I could adjust it to the Hydroshot and it provided enough foam. Start from zero, then start spraying and turn the top very slowly. Also make sure, you are in not ECO mode on the Hydroshot.
Hope this helps,
Viktor
Great video Viktor 👍
Thank you Peter🙌 I appreciate you watched it 🙂
very good comparison, i would definitely go for the MJJC pro v2. did you do the test with an electric washer or petrol one? and which orifice did you use? i heard smaller orifice is better for weaker electric washer and bigger one for stronger petrol ones.
Thank you!
I used a Karcher K4 compact pressure washer and both MJJC had the wider, 1.25mm orifice installed. I wouldn’t suggest the 1.1mm for anything more powerful than a K2 to be honest, there is no need for that. :)
@@RoadToDetailing awesome, thanks for the quick reply! Good job again!
@dudekidPL appreciate your feedback and glad I was able to help 🙌
Excellent work pal
I appreciate you we’re tuning in Jonny 🙌
Hi Viktor, according to your accent, you must Hungarian 😉. Correct me if I'm wrong. Good content by the way
Hi Horatio! Yes, I am Hungarian 🙌 My accent is pretty strange in general, as well as including the main Hungarian accent accords 😅 Well spotted! Thanks for tuning in mate,
Viktor
A magyar akcentust nem lehet megtéveszteni 😂😂😂
Áldott húsvéti ünnepet és a lehető legjobbakat kívánom neked és a családoknak
@horyka69 igaz :) Nagyon szépen köszönöm! Kellemes húsvéti ünnepeket Nektek is 🙌