The Flawed Math Behind This Paper EXPOSED!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ต.ค. 2024
- In this TH-cam live, we will dissect the mathematical flaws of a controversial paper that tries (and fails) to challenge the modern understanding of multiplication. Together, we’ll break down the errors, explore the faulty logic, and discuss how such flawed mathematical reasoning managed to get published.
This isn’t just about math-it’s about learning how to critically evaluate research and avoid falling for pseudo-academic claims.
🔍 Watch as we expose the mathematical gaps and discuss what went wrong!
Check out the paper here: www.pulsus.com...
Follow Prakhar for Insightful Math Content: www.instagram....
Check out the last video where I debunked the paper: • Debunking the Most Rid...
You can find my silly projects here: drive.google.c...
You can buy Intellectual Goodies from: my-last-neuron...
You can follow me on:
Instagram: www.instagram....
LinkedIn: / kshitij-pandey-30215314b
Facebook: / ilovecosmology
![อิสราเอลโดนอิหร่านถล่มหนักกว่าที่คุย : [คุยผ่าโลก worldtalk]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/R8gIN-MQhWw/mqdefault.jpg)
Amazing explanation by Prakhar.
Based on what I understood, here is a brief summary of his argument on how Mohit's definition is circular:
1. Mohit says that zero is not a number that denotes nothingness but a set that contains equal amount of positive and negative numbers. The problem with this definition is that you cannot define negative numbers without establishing zero as term for nothingness first, because the way negative numbers are defined is in terms of zero. For example -2 is defined as the number which if you add to 2 gives 0. Negative numbers do not mean anything without the concept of 0.
2. Mohit proves -(-a)=a with this reasoning: If from zero which is a set that contains equal amount of positive and negative numbers, you have to find out what -(-1) is you have to remove -1 and what you are left with is 1. Therefore -(-1)=1.
Prakhar's point is if you take a = -1 and -a = -(-1), if you remove 'a' what you get is '-a' which is -(-1). You do not get 1. The only way you can get 1 is by assuming beforehand that -(-1)=1. Hence the circularity.
Thankyou for putting it all together in one place. These are exactly my questions/criticisms directed towards Mohit's definition.
@@pursuingstacksbro aaplog kyo nhi jate unke chennal par ( not sanatan reveals) vigyan darshan
Agar or aap nhi jate to vo kyo aae???? Kuchh samjh nhi aaya
@@pursuingstacks glad to help bro. Kidhar gayab ho vese WhatsApp reply nhi krte?
@@KARELAMASTERThetruth bhai... keep it simple, mathematical content pe focus kar... do you find a flaw in his argument? And, voh kyun jayenge, unko koi bulayega toh jayegne na? And, regardless, that all is meaningless, ap mathematical argument par focus karo, not all this bulcrap...
Ha bhai kisi ko kahi Jane ki jarurat nhi jisko Jo smjhna/maanna hai vo maane hame bas apne kaam pe focus karna hai jisko nhi smjhna hai vo kabhi nhi smjhega👍@@Arch009
A new Era of academic discussions is starting on Indian TH-cam....
And you people are one of the pioneers of that here....
Kudos to you bhaiyo...
Keep going all the best ...
This is what i was thinking.
Yes
Agree
We want creators like you science with adhira, be rational, bioshala, logical aayam and the great "Science journey" sir 🎯💯
All of them are uneducated illiterate unqualified berojgar youtubers
Science chutney mujse darta hai
@@MohommadAnsari-i9k kha gufa me niyog se ya madarse me halaala se🤔🙊🙉🙈🕺💃👯
@@MohommadAnsari-i9kKYA FACT HAI TERE PAAS BATAA ,KYA DEBATE KARI HAI KABHI
❤
I must commend you guys on taking this initiative. We seriously need such channel that discuss on scientific temperament and debunking pseudo religious blind claims.
Mohit GAPODA debunking ke pahle dusro ke channel pe jaake apne research ka khub showoff/dinge haak rha tha 😂😂😂 bechara debunk k bad mai 20 sal ka tha mujhe grammer nhi aati thi concept me bhi thodi galti hai ab aage se dursa research karunga
@@aloneboy_0696 lmao🤣😂
Zero means no magnitude that's why it is neither negative not positive. It's nothing.
fact 👌
No no it's a portal between negative and positive numbers! 😂
@@tdj461😂😂fr
You guys are dumb as a turd.
If I have Rs. 20 in my pocket but I owe you Rs. 20 then tell me do I have Rs. 20 or 0 rupee ?
Use your brain.
0 is always a set of positive and negative of the same number.
You give credit to Aryabhatta for the invention of 0 but at the same time ignore the reasoning behind it and label it with western definition. Kudos to you sir. You just won a Darwin Award.
@@tdj461🤣🤣
00:07 वीडियो में गहन गति से मैथमेटिकल विवाद दिखाया गया।
01:23 University physics competition and flawed research paper
02:47 Developing skills and pushing oneself beyond limits
03:26 Acknowledging mistakes and accepting feedback
04:47 Media sensationalism affecting scientific temperament
05:30 Author admitted to flaws in a published paper.
07:04 The debate mechanism in video analytics
07:42 The statement that predatory journals are subjective is flawed.
09:04 Flawed paper got accepted despite multiple errors
09:50 Discussion about the potential list of Tree Genel Control F in the paper
11:30 Errors in calculations despite thorough review
12:12 The paper may have calculation mistakes but is well reviewed
13:38 हर साल होता है एसएसआई, अनुसंधान पोस्टरों को डूबाने के बाद।
14:22 Discussing the creator friend's concern about feasibility of a comment
16:35 Incorrect information can be harmful in scientific and mathematical experiments.
17:40 Speed of writing in the paper raises doubts
19:25 Debate around the flaws and acceptance of the paper
20:04 Importance of thorough research in academic settings
21:52 Attempting to prove the accuracy of a conjecture through mathematical research.
22:41 Addressing doubts and concerns in the paper
24:31 Confusion between pedagogy and mathematical content clarity
25:38 Pedagogy versus defining things are two different aspects.
27:39 Multiple definitions of multiplication in the paper
28:42 Flawed definition of the paper
30:47 Reinterpreting zero leads to inaccuracies in math
31:41 Understanding multiplikation and restrictive numbers
33:23 Criticism on personal attacks and math discussion.
34:01 Discussion on the flaws in the multiplying algorithms and negative time proofs
36:04 Challenging the reliance on intuition in mathematics
37:03 Importance of Mathematical Rigor in Formal Definitions
39:20 Reevaluation of zero as a number
40:33 Discussing the negative and positive signs in the context of mathematics
42:23 New definition of multiplication explained for 12-year-olds
43:27 Circular argument and counterpoint in definitions
45:26 Defining loss and negative numbers.
46:18 Defining negative and loss in terms of nothingness
48:23 Explaining the concept of second circularity in algebra
49:17 Explaining the concept of negative numbers and how they are defined.
51:10 Concept of zero with equal positive and negative amounts
52:14 The flawed definition of negative of negative
54:18 Examining the nature of negative of negative W+
55:24 Documenting definitions and references for a research paper
57:04 Explaining the flaws in detail is crucial for understanding the circularity.
57:53 Pedagogy and mathematical research are distinct
59:32 Failure to explain fundamental definitions accurately
1:00:19 Misunderstanding of complex multiplication and rotation terms.
1:01:59 Discussing mathematical topics in a respectful manner
1:03:01 Misrepresentation and promotion in Indian mathematics
1:04:56 Zero multiplied by zero is undefined
1:05:50 Wrong reasoning leading to flawed conclusions
1:07:46 Exposing flaws in the mathematical analysis
1:08:29 Mistakes are part of learning
1:10:09 गलत आइडियाज और सहायकता के महत्व
1:11:08 Significance of mathematical proofs and Ramanujan's approach
1:12:58 Ramanujan considered a review with some key points
1:13:46 Importance of formal methods and proofs
1:15:39 Exploring the fundamental entities and mathematical concepts
1:16:29 Mathematical inconsistencies lead to flawed conclusions
1:18:14 Explaining the concept of negative numbers in domains
1:19:09 Understanding the concept of negative and positive numbers through easy pedagogy
1:21:03 Explaining the concept of negative numbers and real numbers
1:21:58 Multiplication of negative matrices can result in a positive matrix.
1:23:49 Cross product of vectors satisfies the property of natural numbers multiplication.
1:24:46 Binary operations explained using order logic
1:26:33 Multiplication behaves fundamentally different from addition.
1:27:23 Difference between matrix addition and multiplication algorithms
1:29:06 Difference between matrix multiplication and addition in brackets
1:30:13 The distinction between matrix multiplication and addition is fundamental.
1:32:08 Mathematically true concepts are derived using logical reasoning from a given set of axioms.
1:33:13 Inadequate evidence to support claims in research paper.
1:35:02 The flawed math in the paper has been exposed
1:35:48 Discussion on fake accounts & low engagement
1:37:10 Focus on ideas over people's intelligence or personality
1:37:48 Discussion on intellectual debates and formal debates
1:39:43 Simplify pedagogical concepts for better understanding
1:40:41 Identifying problems in the flawed construct
1:42:13 The video discusses the flaws in mathematical claims made by scholars.
1:42:57 Unified theory has solved many problems in particle physics and inflation.
1:44:42 Discussion on basic insights from the paper
1:45:31 Discussion about Insightful Conclusions
1:46:56 Evolution is not wrong, misunderstood by scientific community
1:47:46 Disputing claims of research result manipulation
1:49:21 The research paper contains fundamental misunderstandings.
1:50:32 Misinterpretation of negative times positive
1:52:08 Negative times negative results in positive
1:53:05 Institutions define general things using itself
1:54:44 Explaining the concept of zero and nothingness
1:55:55 Understanding zero time as multiplying by nothing
1:57:48 Discussion on research paper critique
1:58:27 Discussion about Prakhar's depth in mathematics and physics.
2:00:04 Discussion on Vedic Physics and Epic Evidence
This was really good. Keep it up Kshitij. 👍
Keep exposing these so called scientist 😂
Mohit ka Vedic carrier khatam hone wala hai 😅😂
Acha h 👍🏻
Mohit ko 10th class ki basic maths bhi nhi aati.
@@RohitVerma1289English मे भी गलतियां है... वू सही मे किसी बढे कॉलेज मे पढ़ा भी है की नहीं.. ये भी डाउट हो रहा है
Tujhe pta ha to cos(180) kitna hota ha
CHOODH YAAR IN SANATANIYON KO AKAL TOH AAYI KE VIGYAN SAARE DHARMON KA BAAP HAI VIGYAN NE SABHI DHARAMON KE ANDHVISHWASH KO TODHA HAI AUR YEH MAHAAN SCIENCE KO VEDON SE NIKLA HUA BATA RAHE HAI
SHABAASH BETA
Wow literally this is the end of mohit nice explanation by prakhar ❤️ keep educating the society and youth🌟
@@Ayush-tc8qz Thankyou but please refrain from making statements like "end of Mohit" , that was never our intention when we started thinking about debunking his paper. The idea was just to make a rebuttal through which he eventually learns something and improve.
Bahat hi achha education Diya bro ।।। Love from odisha ❤❤❤
Thankyou. Glad ki aap ko kuch seekhne ko mila 🙏🏽
Absolutely loved prakhar's explantation. Spot on peer review. Keep up the good work
Thankyou. Really glad to hear that 🙏🏽
Amazing discussion. Learnt so many things.
Love to kshitij and prakhar❤
@@sshivam_shah Thankyou. Really glad to hear that.
Prakhar Bhai Ki Mathematical knowledge Bahut gajab hai❤️❤️ Kash Meri bhi hoti because Maths Is only subject jaha mujhe smjhne Mai bahut Time lag jaata hai Baaki In real world I understand Everything very Easily but why i stuck in maths , i don't know , maybe it's because Of kyuki mera interest Nahi tha bachpan me maths me But Astronomy me kaafi jyada tha .
First of all thankyou for the kind words. Mera bhi maths mei interest Physics, Astronomy ke baad aaya hai. Toh aisa nahi hai exactly ki maths mei interest develop nahi ho sakta. Mai aapko suggest karunga ki har ek cheez ko depth mei samjhne ki koshish kariye jo jo padhaya jaaye usmei puchiye ki agar aisa nahi hota vaisa hota tab kaise result aata , try to play with maths and don't treat it like a very strict subject. Ye baad sach hai ki har cheez karne ke baad aakhiri mei hme hmare argument ko rigorous banana hota par ha shuruwaat mei khel sakte.
@@pursuingstacks You are right brother ❤️🙏 But mai ab student nahi rha and Maths ki taraf koi efforts dalne ki koshish nahi krta because i am completely into landscape and AstroPhotography now , But fir bhi Thankyou so For your valuable reply brother, han Kabhi life me time lagega To Bilkul maths Ko bhi Understand krne ki koshish krunga
@@mridulmaikhuri144 Bilkul Bilkul. All the best aapko aapki Astrophotography ki journey mei. 😁🙏🏽
@@pursuingstacks thanks a lot bro❤️
BEST EXPLANATION IN BEST MANNER NICE VIDEO BROTHER♥️👍🏅 KEEP MOVING FORWARD 🇮🇳
Vigyan darshan & Sanatan reveals crying together in corner 😂
Lol, they literally debunked him , 😂😂 tere kshitij ka paper dekha sabne😂
@@bullishboi tumhare Mohit ki toh reputation already kharab ho gayi predatory journal mein paper publish karwa ke😂😂...
Ab agar next time uska paper accha bhi hua toh uski authenticity par ek bahot bada question mark rahega
😂
@@bullishboi🤡
@@A4ATHEIST bhai ruk ja mai chupwa de hu😭
Science ko vedo se door hi rakhe ye log to achha hai vedo me ghanta science hai
Aap kis science ki baat kar rahe hai jise dur rakha jaye and kyu rakha jaaye and kya refrence hai ki ved me science nahi hai . I don't claim that ved have science because I didn't read them but I can't deny that they don't have science because I didn't read them so did you read every single line of ved before claiming your words. Another point is everything is philosophy until it gets proven after proof it becomes science best example quantum mechanics, philosophy: thing can be anything when you are not looking at it , quantum physics: without observe matter can be wave pratical both. If you are saying that ved don't have direct science I can agree but if your are saying that they don't have philosophy which can led to science than you should give proof for this
Bhai ved phade hai kya kabhi ?? 😂😂 agar nhi phade hai toh online kuch bhi phar krr sunn krr bhokne se appeal to authority ki fallacy , uppr se ignorance 😂😂 . Thats what atheist is 😂😂
Vedo me science hai bro... utna hai jitna mohit ka maths pe research ki value.. i.e. ZERO
@@prakashchauhan3007 “said by someone who never even touched a text of ved”
Same logic in the case if i say
There is no science in a biology book cause i never read it . 🤣🤣 Atheists are psuedoskeptic
@@prakashchauhan3007 chalo maan liya ki ved me science nahi hai but kya aapne saare ved padhe hai ye baat claim karne se pehele ?? Because ek aadmi ek claim tabhi karta hai jab uske paas proofs ho dekho mai na to ye claim karta hun ki ved me science hai na hi ye ki nahi hai because maine unhe nahi padha hai but kya aap ne padhe hai jo aap ye baat bol rahe hai ??
bhai unke livestream k niche mere comments check kiye kisi ne😂? in thiests ki hypocrisy mai comment me hi nikaal skta hu , live ji jaroorat hi nhi h
Ha Maine Kiya tha, saare comments padhe the
@@RimaDesu00 bhai ye log abhi khud se hi aware nahi hai lekin baatein krte hain bhgwan ki😂
@@mridulmaikhuri144ye guu khate hai inke muh lagne ki jarurat nhi hame apna kaam AAAGE karte rhna hai Aaj ke baad koi inke muh nhi lagega👍
Bhai tere maliko ki dhulai toh main hi karta hu tum chelo kya hypocrisy nikaloge. Sj, azad, hws sab ne darkar block kar diya
What happened there bro?
PRAKHAR 🗿❤️
Bhai is hyper wale ka dyper ankit bhai ne faada h wo dekho maza ayega🤣😂ankit bhai k samne to bol bhi nhi paa rha tha
Please tell me channel name, which Ankit ?
Bioshala
Iitna dum hai toh debate kyu nahi karte,?
Peet peche kyu bhokte hai?
@@MohommadAnsari-i9kto bhej na
@@vegaz4966 koi neutral platform mai formal invitation do. Apne apne channel mai baithke kutte ki tarha bhokne se kuch nahi hoga 🤡
Good job kshitij and prakhar ❤ remember hamara uddesya bharat ko firse mahan banana hai bina tark pramad vigyan itihas siksha ke begair ye sab sambhav nhi h❤️aane wale samay me aap sabhi naam yaad kiya jayega👍
Thankyou for the kind words 🙏🏽 Ji bilkul koshish vaisi hi rahegi.
Talking politely doesn't make a person nice. He amount of propaganda Mohit spread is detrimental to society. Misleading information , and cleverness over it can't be applauded. Of course you guys aren't actually appreciating him. But let's not judge polite way of talking as the only character trait.
With his actions without even saying he strengthens caste system
Very true. The people like Mohit are more dangerous. The guy has understood that there is a space left in Hinduism which no one has ever touched. He's trying to be Jordan Peterson of India. Same type or pseudo intellectual BS.
He should be called out properly and harshly (not in terms of disrespect but not saying that he agrees on this that but actually he's spreading propaganda).
Oiii. Bhadwo. Apne baap ksitij se pucho. Ki usne apne linkden account se apne research papers ko delete kyu kar diya 😂😂😂
Just go and check there 😂
How does Mohit strengthen caste system?
We all are against it. There's no case system in Hinduism 😂
Yes totally agree brother ♥️👍 you can see in the podcast of hyper quest how he hates.....to us even look at his friends circle they are totally extremists
@@MohommadAnsari-i9kthe comment itself shows how castiest you re cuz you need guts to accept the reality 👍
Thanks for exposing him🎉🎉🎉. Keep it up
And the vigyan darshan definition is complete blunder to mathmatics because then what is the difference in the set of real numbers and the zero because set of real numbers is (- ♾️ to +♾️) .
Ap lazy is live wale rudra ho na?
@@beyonder7194 yes bhai aapko kaise pata
@@Rudragupta4478Par aap to atheist nahi ho phir aisi baate kyo
@@Rudragupta4478 and this thing pisses me off when he tortures the actual vedic text to somehow extract some scientific verse from it
@@Rudragupta4478 Lazy ko bolo stream kare ispe ap bhi rehna
I am here after the 2nd debate
Phod diya
Science is dope alwyas and forever
9 अक्टूबर वाले स्टीम में पेले गये वहां से भाग गया astro kshitij😂😂
maine paper padha, ek jagah par "expandation" likha tha, confuse ho gya fir 2 minute baad smjh aya ki bhai expansion likhna chahte the.
Hi guys, I have a feedback for you.
Ye sab cheeze live me mat kiya karo.
Ek video crisp rhegi. And point to point rhegi.
Video k liye talking points rhenge to better analogies rhegi.
As your guest mentioned he wanted to make a video on it. To I think vo usme zada clearly baat kar paate.
I sensed that unke mind me bht saari arguments ek saath chl rhi thi.
He did the best he could. But i think he has a lot to say, but live ki anxiety me kuch miss hua.
I understand ki it's a lot of work to make a video on such discussions.
Pr you people are doing something important. You should put your arguments clearly.
You knew what you wanted to say. You probably made pointers.
But you should've asked your guest to do the same. Or should've done it in a video format.
Those people did it because unhe bas views chahiye. They care fck all about the Vedas or sanatan or mathematics.
Ye dharmic TH-camr bs views k bhookhe bhediye hai. Inko fark nhi pdta ki inki misinformations se kya ho skta h.
Vimoh ka godi youtubers wali video explains it better. But they don't seek the truth, they don't want betterment of their religion.
Unko views hi chahiye. Vo fame k bhookhe bachhe h.
Kam mehnat karke clicks dharmic videos bnake milte h.
You people are making a difference. Do it right.
Vo log 8 ghante bhi live kr skte hai. Because unki stream me substance 5% hoga.
But if you aim to make content for the betterment of society then do such content not on live.
Time de hi rhe ho to achhe se do.
Apna discussion karo with talking points, better analogies.
Cover all ends.
Kitna bhi humble ho lo, vo log aise hi h.
Agr Mohit me sach me humility hoti to vo videos retract krta. Ya fir apni shortcomings address karta.
It's good that you're cherry picking their good bits, so your audience don't stoop to their level.
But don't forget that they are doing it deliberately.
Great Discussion 👍❤ From Ayodhya
Bharat ki parampra rahi h debates karna ....1000 sal ke pahle pura bharat buddhamay tha aur buddhist log debates karte the.....aap log acha kam kar rahe ho.....jinhe bawal lgta h vo jaye big boss dekhe
Mere se debate karle
@@situationxd8650 give me ₹500000
And I will do anything
@@hallofsilence8992 ☠️💀?
bhai app log bahat achha kam karrhey ho hamare Odisha me bahat bahat pseudoscience fela hua hey apki videos dekhke bo thode samjhenge sayad agar samajhna chahe to , warna bo to bohi pseudo scientists ke upare jyada bharosa karte hey
Bhai gaadi palat gyi kshitiz fas gya
Where are all sanatanis now 😂😂
Abhi gobar mutra ka Sevan karke aate hi honge 😂
@@aloneboy_0696bas label aur stereotype karna aata hai😂. Farzi
@@Eternal00211 bol bhi kon rha h jo 10 gaali logo ko comment me pahle deke aa chuka ho🤡
Stereotype krdeta hu cool lagunga @@aloneboy_0696
I think sare sanatani idhar hi hain🤩
Udhar koi nhi rha😅
मुझे बहुत अच्छा लगा की हमारे देश के युवा गणित के सिद्धांतों पर अच्छा चर्चा कर रहे हैं। बस मुझे यह कहना है की हमलोग सारा ज्ञान जब विदेशों से मोहर लग कर आता है उसी को सही क्यों मानते हैं?
क्या हमने अपने देश के पुराने ज्ञान को अच्छे से समझ लिया?
आज परमाणु जिसे atom कहते है वो जब विदेशों से आया तब तुरंत हम स्वीकार किए लेकिन ऋषि कनाड के ज्ञान को नहीं पढ़ा। उन्होंने परम अणु के बारे में बताया जो की आज के atom से भी कई गुना छोटा होता है। लेकिन चूंकि वो संस्कृत में है और हमको संस्कृत से दूर कर दिया गया।
शिवकर बापू जी तलपड़े विमान के ऊपर काम किए लेकिन उसपर हम शोध नही कर रहे क्योंकि वो भारतीय हैं।
राधानाथ सिकदर जी जिन्होंने माउंट एवरेस्ट की ऊंचाई 1931 में सबसे पहले नाप कर बताया लेकिन उसका क्रेडिट अंग्रेजों ने एक अंग्रेज अधिकारी को दिया उसपर कोई शोध नही कोई वीडियो नही।
अब जरा वर्तमान विषय की बात कर लें...
भारत के एक युवा मोहित गौर ने आधुनिक गणित में - - के गुणा पर एक चर्चा की और उसको समैक्यम खम, आलोप इत्यादि सिद्धांतों की रोशनी में व्याख्या करने का कोशिश किया और आपलोग भी भारत के युवा है उस सिद्धांत पर चर्चा करना शुरू किए।
अब जरा यह बताइए जिस अंदाज में इस वीडियो और इसके पहले के वीडियो में आपलॉग मुस्कुरा कर चर्चा कर रहे हैं वो किसी का मजाक उड़ने जैसा ज्यादा लग रहा है।
अब जरा पुराने ग्रंथों के ज्ञान पर बात कर लें।
आज के गणित में यह शून्य को जो कुछ नही कहा जा रहा है यह केवल इस भौतिक जगत में दृश्यमान चीजों के परिप्रेक्ष्य में कहा जा रहा है।
अब इसका क्या यदि शून्य से ही सम्पूर्ण shristi ki उत्पत्ति हुई हो?
अब इसका क्या की शून्य से निकलकर शून्य में समा जाना है अगर यह यूनिवर्स का सिद्धांत हो तो?
अब इसका क्या की थियरी of evolution कहता है की क्रमिक विकास के चलते आज का मनुष्य, जीव जंतु सब बने है? जो की एकदम गलत सिद्धांत है क्योंकि एक निर्जीव से सजीव अपने आप क्रमिक विकास से कैसे बनेगा यह अभी तक नही पता चला। क्रमिक विकास में म्यूटेशन से एक वायरस नया वायरस तो बन सकता है लेकिन कुत्ता, बिल्ली, मनुष्य तो नही बन सकता।
बातें बहुत सी हैं। अगर भारत के साइंटिफिक टेंपरामेंट को समझना है तो पहले अपने ancient knowledge को समझना होगा। संस्कृत का ज्ञान लेकर हर पुस्तक का अध्ययन करना होगा तब जाकर डिस्कशन होगा तो सही दिशा में हम पहुंचेंगे।
I appreciate how Kshitij and Prakhar refrained from personal attacks and instead viewed this as a challenge to comprehend the given information and uncover any hidden agendas in the paper.
Great work guys ❤❤
@@piyushchouhan5398 Thankyou for your kind words and yes that indeed was the goal.
Papers of this sort are almost always a very good mathematical exercises to test our understanding of the concepts involved. Sometimes reviewing someone's research on some topic is just as exciting as learning new things about that topic.
It's nothing but making the whole country a laughing stock... anyway your channel is working great ...keep up gud work
मैने 5 अक्टूबर के विज्ञान दर्शन का वीडियो देखा जिसके बाद aaplog यह वार्तालाप कर रहे हैं जिसमें aaplog बोल रहे हैं की केवल विज्ञान दर्शन में आपके पुराने किसी रिसर्च पर चर्चा की जा रही है,
लेकिन जरा उस पूरे वीडियो को 2 घंटे 17 मिनट्स के बाद से देखिए जिसमें आपके सारे उठाए गए प्रश्नों के बारे में बात कीया गया है।
जिसमें आईआईटी के रिसर्चर भी बैठे हैं। अब आप हायर क्लास की गणित को मोहित के रिसर्च से जोड़ रहे है। जो की गलत है।
मोहित ने अपना रिसर्च स्कूल लेवल 12th tak ke विद्यार्थियों को मल्टीप्लिकेशन के टर्म्स के बारे में किया है।
Aaplog जरा समैक्यम खम को जरा समझाइए
At 54At 54:54
Zero is a set of {+ & -} if we subtract -1 then
Reamin set is negative of negative = -(-1)
Am I correct 😅?
@@gazzaligazzali1500 no zero is neutral if u r studies about jee. Then clearly mention zero is neutral. But if someone ask u what is positive integer then u said [0, infinite) and if someone ask u negative integer then u said (- infinite, 0] but if someone ask u what is non negative integer then u said (0 , infinite) pls notice about bracket and same question what is non positive integer then u said (- infinite, 0) still notice about bracket. () [] both bracket have different meaning. Zero is a sum of +ve and -ve value. Let be understand more if u say I have all real value. It direct mean u tell me that i have -infinite to +infinite okay. What happened if I ask u what will answer if I do addition of + infinite and - infinite u said zero 0️⃣ but it is not possible it is out of range of mathematic.
Bro if brahmgipta and aryabhatt have found zero then whT zer9 is mist be defined by them.
And about west they don't know about zero even during 1500ad
@@JACK_OF
Great discussion on maths unlike some other channel how just do trolling
👍 keep going.. brother 😊
We want debate
Debate is last final round
astro kshitj ki awaaz bahut low hai and prakhar ki awaaz bahut high hai ..isiliye volume up down karni padrahi hai video me... please reupload if editing is possible
1) we can have negative numbers without zero eg=> like we know positive and negative charges and they cancel out each other we don't need nothingness here to define +ve and -ve quantity
2) if 0 = +ve infinity + -ve infinity
Arg1
Zero is a set equal amount of +ve and equal amount of -ve
Arg2
+ve number or charge is always canceled by -ve and vice versa
0 = +ve infinity + -ve infinity
Remove number a = -1
Add both side 1 +ve
1 =-a
Hence
-a = 1
No issues observed
Waiting for your reply
I am just curious about topic
Not taking sides like vedic wale vs modern science wale
1:28:20 wow moment.
Prakhar is Legend 💞💞💞 Prakhar is genius ❤❤
Continue this type of debunking , huge scope he
Mohit denied evolution theory
Kstij bhai kisi social media me ho kya ap?
I think Mohit's new definition is linguistically well presented to tech to students and did anyone notice it follows the same method of Exponentials? Like it set 1 as anchor for repeated multiplication the same way that definition set 0 as anchor for repeated summation. 🤔
PS: Another good intuition for negative multiplication is to define attributes of numbers (without adding rotation), like negative numbers have attributes to change state/domain and positive numbers have attributes to stay in same state/domain; if we multiply any negative then it will change privious number's state/domain therefore if a negative numbers get multipled by other then it will change it's domain to positive axis. This is same as assuming of N - (-M) = N + M (In that definitions, it uses this too)
Amazing ❤
Prakhar's voice issue
Kyu ki o utuber nahi hai
Mohit ne pura video bhi banaya hai jo s topic par
0 me + aur - dono equal hai lekin wo AVYAKT hai
Usko define nahi kiya ja sakta
Bhai tum dono ki bate sunne ke bad me ak debate dekhna chata hu bs ab aap log debate krna koe video mt bnao 😑vrna tum log smy khrab kr rhe ho
ये टुन्नीयो की ट्रोल आर्मी किसी की नहीं सुनती,वू सीधा कमैंट्स सुरु कर देते है.. जैसा की इस वीडियो मे भी दिख रहा है..
Good work sir
बेटा जब सनातन रिवील्स ने तुम्हारा पेज खोलने शुरू किया तब तो तुझ में कुछ अकल आई नहीं तो इंग्लिश का पेपर चेक कर रहे थे और तुम्हारे तो फिजिक्स पकड़ा गया तब तो अकल आई है
Pahley expose fir expose ka expose fir expose ke expose ka expose! Wtf....🤯
Bhai kal Sanatan Reveals channel pe Maine tumhare paper ka Dubunk dekha 😂 aur woh dekhne k baad mujhe tum par jyada hassi aati hai... Yeh kaam kabhi physics expert ko laake apne paper ka bhi review Karo
Video me dekho, he is accepting it and he said he made it in less than 48 hours and he did not claim to change entire mathematics with said paper.
We all make mistakes but when you accept it and improve your self that's what matters.
Secondly agar Vedo me itna science hai to usko poore world se share karo kyon usko chupa ke rakhha hai.
@@TruthSlap9 one more point usane har channel par ja ke ki dekho Kitana mahan kaam kar diya maine us garbage paper ka
@@TruthSlap9ved kabhi chhupe hi nhi the ... Nicole Tesla, Carl sage, etc ne vedoko padha h jb bahar k desh k log padh sakte h to ... There's no point to say ki vedo ko chhupa kr rakha h ... Ved is already exposed to the world.
@@ndongre108 not talking about Ved here, I'm asking about the science hidden in Vedas, if we say we haven't found it but westeners read and understood science, it makes us look like fools
@@TruthSlap9there is no hidden Science in Vedas tujhe Philosophy litrature ki ghanta knowledge nahi hai
47:14
54:46 😂
45
-
-16
_______
Usme ( - )aur (-) ko ham log (+ )kyu karte hai ye samjhao
Bhai kuchh khud bhi pdh lo. Bahut sara content pda h. Sikho padho.
Pr kyuki aapko janna nhi h bs aapne question isliye puchha ki koi explanation de fir aap use tod mod kr wapas wahi le aao ki dekha bola tha na aap glt ho Mohit sahi hai ya hm sahi hain.
Ek bar ke liye khud se baith kr sawal krna kbhi akele me..ki kya kr rhe hain hm ye TH-cam me hatred faila kr. Ye dono log jo baate bol rhe h chahe mohit ya koi bhi channel unhe jaake khud kyu nhi dekhte..khud pdh kr sahi glt kyu nhi sikhte...
@@Skeptic_arunBhai iske baki questions dekho samajh aa jayega. Bakiyon ka to pata nhi, iska to IQ bhi nhi lagta itna hoga ki ye kisi din khud se mehnat karne bhi lage to ise kuchh samajh aayega.
@@ankurmishra9923 haan bhai pr kya kre inka jameer jaage aisi baate to bol hi skte hain.kyuki ye to andhe bhakt hain koi kya bol rha h janna h nhi bs aankh band krke bhid jana h kisi se bhi.
Ab tujhe jod ghatav bhi sikhana padega
@@annusharma4345 Jod ghatav me (-) aur (-) (+) kyu hota hai
kshtiz bhai reply karo please kya aap dono discuss karme ke liye unke chennal ( not sanatan reveals) vigyan darshan pe bhi ja skte ho na? aap 2 baar apne Chennal par content bana chuke ho pehle hi apne chennal pe i hope aap views ke bhukhe to nhi ho ki bar bar khudke yaha hi karo..and ha why you again and again usinh debate word. Why not discussion word?
@@KARELAMASTERThetruth aapko agar lagta hai ki mohit bhaiya sahin hai, toh unka claim defend kariye. Debate se aapka kya lena dena ?
@@redblueblur6321 knowledge ke sochenge toh entertainment kaise hoga 😂
आचार्य जी भी स्ट्रिंग थ्योरी और बिग बैंग को नाकार रहे हैं और यह वाला बोल रहा है कि यह वेदों में बिग बैंग खोज रहा है शब्दों को इंटरप्रेट करना अच्छा जानते हैं
Ye to apni hi imaginary argument banky unko counter kar Raha hai . Abby complet behra hai kya
@@kira_bl8qy किसे बोल रहे हो एस्ट्रो को या मुझे
string theory academically accepted bhi nahi hai....
We already saw your embarassment in that live... Please don't try to cover up now
Mohit Ka Bhi 4 varsh pahle ka tha par Use research paper Ko Theek karne ka chance nahin tha Par 8 saal baad Mohit ne Tumhe Bataya To Hi theek kar paye. Pahle Khud ko dekhna chahiye. Lol
Kshitij ne kabhi news channel me claim nahi kiya bade bade jo ye Mohit kar raha hain!
Isne kab jaake har jagah prachaar kiya aur na hi claim Kiya ki koi peer reviewed research hai. Jo claim Kiya gaya hai uspe khara to utare.
Bhai research paper ke glt hone sahi hone se dikkt nhi h. Hr saal hazaro paper glt prove hote hain. Problem hai apne paper ka danka bajana ko science ko jhutha sabit kr diya ya science ne bhi hme maan liya kyuki hmne paper publish kiya science journal me..
Ye sb kiya Mohit ji ne. Aur ye baar baar kiya. Aur ab ye mt kahna unhone aisa koi claim nhi kiya bahut videos hain is pr unke.
Dusra point paper ko leke. Paper me koi glti hone (jo ki kshitij ke paper me thi) aur pur paper basic se hi glt hona do alg alg baate hain. Linguistics aur definitions glt thi. Plus me unhone sirf multiplication ko define kiya use hazar aur trike ke kiya jaa skta h. Aur agr ye paper sahi bhi hota to unka claim fir bhi bahut bada tha ki pure science ko hmne glt kr diya.
Kbhi apne biase ko side me rkh kr rationally soch kr dekhna achha lgega. Dharm ka chasma utar kr dekho.
Aur ye comment ka screenshot leke rkh lena mere bhai aaj.
Mohit ji ne Arpit ke sath debate me kaha tha wo aur research kr rhe h vedas pr aur nayi khoj laayenge wo. To mea challenge h aage aane wale 50-60-70 saalo me ek bhi scientific discoveries krke dikha dein wo..main maan jaunga aur hindu dhrm bhi apna lunga.
मोहित ने मीडिया मे जाके क्लेम किये है.....मेरा यहाँ पे छपा है वहां पे छपा है कहके अपने बात को मजबूती दे रहा है तो लोग पढ़ेंगे ही उसने ऐसा तो क्या लिखा है... उसपे रिव्यु तो आएंगे ही..
@@WalletmoneyOnline Mohit dusro ke channel pe jakke khub dinge haak rha tha Mera researrrrrrrch paper🤡
Kstij bhagode
Bhai ek rebuttal se hi itni maturity aagayi aapme😂
Kab nhi thi
@@vegaz4966 rehne do bhai sawan ke andhe ko sab Hara he dikhta hai isko sirf attention chahiye rage bait karke, bot kahi ka
@@vegaz4966 ek stream pahle
Bro Mai kisi taraf nhi tha kal tak lekin kshitij bhai ko kal ke stream se bahut chot pahuchi hai 🤣
@@SatyamTiwari-lz3xd not about people about ideas and claims, one accepts them and one makes the entire 4 hour stream just to show that you are not eligible no matter if his mistake point was necessary and right
Baki Jo karna hai Karo, hasna hai toh haso
Bhai apko don't likhna ata nhi aur aye hi apni tareke se expose krne.
Don't worry mohit aur research papers likhega.
gajab chomu hai tune video dekha bhi hai?
इस stream meh kshijit ka face dekne layak tha😂.
haramto ki ab pol khulne lagi hai
Someones(mohit) paper is discussed in foreign universities aur koi youtube pe bakchodi kar ke khud ko mathematician samjhta hai 🤡
Discuss? 😂😂😂 Pesa khilake publish ✔️
Published Kiya hai bro . Koi shabashi wala Kam nhi kiya . 😂😂
Koi bahot badi invention nhi kar di Jo itna udd rhe ho ..koi discussion nhi ho rhi . Sapno se bahar aja
Wait! What?? 😮 Discussed in foreign universities??😂😂
Matlab Mathematics sirf foreigners ko hi aati hai aree unhe to English bhi nahi aati 😂
@@vegaz4966 ree bakchod logo ko bas apne dhram ke naam pe sexual orgasm le na hai bas oh yeah daddy oh yeah uffff
Bhai tu apna camera band kar deta aur Prakhar bhai ka camera chalu rakhta to achche se samjh aata
Ghanta samjh nahi aaya
Arey streaming setup ka problem hoga bhai
Bina proper setup ke bhut lag hota hai or camera ke lag ke karan audio bhi distort ho jaati hai isliye camera ki jgh sirf audio on tha shyd
COVID me online classes krne wale bde acche se jhele hai ye type ka problem
Tum hi dedo ager wo galat hai to.....
Tumhare sare arguments kamjor h
😂😂😂 baklol pehel 10th complete kar le
तो मजबूत आरगुमेंट किसके है मोहित ke??😂😂
tumne arguments sune bhi nahi... the truth is, you're a biased judge, not a rational spectator, of course you find them weak?
Pura sunle 😂phle
Mohit ne pant me hi hag diya bhai ye toh shuru hote hi khatm ho gya 😂😂😂😂
😂lol😂
bhai tu mohit se debate karna acchi bat hai lekin nek irade se karna , galat irade se mat kar tera career end ho sakta hai 😁
Aapko bhavishya ki shubhkamnaye 🎉
Bhai tu career likhna seekh le warna Tera career shuru hone se pehle end ho jayega 😂😂
P.S. he wrote 'carrier' earlier. 🤡
Hyper quest bruh graduated from public toilet 🚽🪠🤡
@@RtnkMonbhai isne yahi comment me career* ko "carrier" likh ke 10-20 baari spam kara stream pe, ye bot hai jsiki jali hui hai 😂
Edit: ab jaake thik kari hai fuddu ne
@@theindicatheist 😂
@vaidik.samiksha arey edit kar diya 😂😂😂😂 pehle carrier likha tha 🤡
Matlab tum bheemte kisi had tak gir jaoge 😅😅😅, dekho bheemte chimte ne apna nam bhi aryan vala rakhaa hai
Lemon choose le bhimto ka.....
Aa gya haramta santra 🤡 Bhagwan Ram ko gali padwa rha hai 🥲
❤
Prakhar Bhai Really sorry , Apki argument baseless laga mujhe , 1 hi baat bar bar bol rahe jiska koi point nahi banta ,
Aisa laga apko aap apni baat ko prove karne k liye jabarjati ka argument de rahe ho
Yes argument to doni ki baseless h lekin prakhar is good in ethics jabki kshitiz is very dusht and nimn koti
Astro bhai tera paper dhekha sanatana reveals ke Chanel pe khud to ek sentence thik se likh nahi sakta . Psychics mein silver medal sale 20% logo ko mila hai tume kya ukhad liya uska pepar review hoke published huya hai, tera paper to reject huya hai calculation errors ke wajah se. (Comment delete hoa to samajh jaunga tu daar gaya)
Sun toh le phle woh kya keh raha hai...aur likhna seekhle thik se...
@@RtnkMon Abe wo khud thik se likh nahi sakta hai yaar ek paper mein kitne sare errors hai or app usko defend karne aye ho . Inka paper hii reject huya hai calculation errors ki wajah se .
Yes uske paper reject hua 2-3 calculations ki karan aur tujhe lagta hai uss Mohit ke pura paper me Grammatical mistake thaa phir bhi peer review ho gya? 🤣 Lmao aur puri stream suun le pehel phir apni bakchodi karna
@@rajnikand it was for a competition, not for any journal 😂....he got 48 hrs to write...
@@RtnkMon okk yaar maan liya compitition hai phir v galtiyan to hai Esme. Compitition hone se galtiyan thik nahi ho jati . Mohit ne paper 12th mein likha tha .phd karte time pe paper likh na sikhaya jata hai app 12th ke bache se academic lavel expect nahi kar sakte . Or uska paper review hoke published huya hai. Tere mere jaise se bohot zada academic scholars ne review Kiya hai.
❤😂
Bhai pehle negative positive ka mtlb smjho tumhe to wo bhi nhi pata
Nice😂😂😂😂 sala astro kshitji ko ghnta smjh nhi aa rha aur na prokhar ko smjh aa rha ki wo kya bol rha hai. Jo tumne video bnaya hai wo zero hai aur ese hi mohit ne smjhaya hai.
video dekh toh le chomu!!!
@@electrondynamics9721 dekh liya jhndu aur maths ko tere se bahut behtr tarike se janta hu
@@vinodswami4216 thanx bro u r the real gem
Bruh tu pehle khudke research papers dekh le 😂😂
Bhai bsc 2 year ka paper h, joki prohect mae tha. Wo koi journal ka hissa nhi h bina vidro dheke comment krdo waah❤
@@rashidrazakhan9153 bruh uske pure papers errors hi errors hai , 2 papers reject bhi ho chuke hai , 3rd paper toh itna chu hai ,bol mat, na references, citation nhi ,fig number nhi , nothing
yeh astro kshitij ke papers like kisi bacche ne likha hai, ja just Jake iska linkedin account dekh, skills me degrees and education mentioned hai ,😂😂
@@rashidrazakhan9153 lol tu Jake kshitij ka LinkedIn account dekh, and uske pehle hi 2papers reject ho gaye hai 😂🤡
@@bullishboihaan toh acche journal mein diye isliye reject hue... predatory journal mein Paisa dekar nahi chawaya 😂😂😂😂
@@RtnkMon acche journal me bacche jaise errors 😂😂🤣 ja Jake linked in account dekh
All chimta group active 😅.. nastik ki aad me ,,
And ramte are crying on thier fake bedu...
Come on buddy debate with me@@shadow-wr8on
Don't get manipulated out by these stupid youtubers . overall they are garbage reviewing some other garbage . No Offence ! 5:20
Chimta group nile kabutaro , hinduo ki piche padoge fir piche hi rah jaoge fir future me rudali rona rouge aaji ham piche rh gye hame padhne nhi diya gya😅
Tu khud padhle DHANG se pehle. Warna PhD karke bhi group D wale job karega agar aise hi concept rahenge to.
@@ankurmishra9923😂😂
Mahadev ka zone toh daruvan hai
Dum hai toh debate karle 😂
Tera bhagoda Mohit ayaa he nahi kal Invitation diya thaa 😂😂😂
@@okay-h2s apne channel mai baithkar bhokna theek nahi.
Apne baap ko bool kisi neutral platform mai unbiased moderator ke saath Mohit Bhai ko official invitation de
@@okay-h2sha bhai kal Mohit ne pant me hg diya 😂😂😂
Bhai, aapne apna research paper delete kyu kar diya lindkdin se 😂
@@MohommadAnsari-i9k Jake check kar dhang se
Video dekh le bsc second yr ka project tha koi uska researched paper nhi h
@@rashidrazakhan9153 I have both the research papers he deleted 😂
There was same grammatical mistakes as in Mohit's.
@@rashidrazakhan9153 20 saal ke Mohit ke paper mai bas grammatical errors thi, but not entire paper
U think UK University ke proffesors unpadh gawaar hai jo peer review nahi kar paye? 🤡
@@MohommadAnsari-i9k lo de ki aulad university se peer reviewed hai hi nahi.....
Finally ❤ 🫡 love you all rational creators...bina koi faltu baaton ke to the point best counter💫
Thankyou. Really Glad aapko pasand aaya🙏🏽
@@manjusingh8228 ♥️
th-cam.com/video/3LfDORrPbBM/w-d-xo.htmlsi=4r7dxRdgWjUFEhsn
Kshitij destroyed by aryaveera
Bahat hi achha education Diya bro ।।। Love from odisha ❤❤❤
Bahat hi achha education Diya bro ।।। Love from odisha ❤❤❤
Bahat hi achha education Diya bro ।।। Love from odisha ❤❤❤