''Only psychoanalysis really can help these patients, there are no other alternatives when it comes to serious pathology of the subjective experience of love and the integration of love and sexuality in all its forms.'' - Much needed today!
Thank you, Dr. Kernberg, for sharing your knowledge with us so generously! This is an excellent lecture. The depth of psychodynamic approach to personality is so sorely needed now. Kudos to the IPA for producing such a high-level video and contributing it to TH-cam!
The first psychologist I saw when I was 20 in 1968 was a Freudian psychoanalyst. I did not know how blessed and privileged I was. It was better than any of the many other therapy modalities I tried throughout the rest of my life. The next best was by Reichian therapist an adherent of Wilhelm Reich a disciple of Freud.
List of Kernberg's "Affect Systems": Attachment system, sexual system, play/affiliation system, fight/flight system, panic system. He implies that each can be identified in the neurobiology/neuroendocrinology of the limbic system.
Extraordinary, thank you very much for such a well structured, usefull explanation.I learned a lot, the mixure with the cases was excellent.I wish all the best, you are a very warmth educated person.
I am the case 2 character. And now I am a father and I doing all the same mistakes. Hopefully I could go to therapy and fix it for my sons future health.
What implications does a lack of parental prohibition(s) during developmental stages have on the ego/superego and potential pathology(ies)? We see in the case studies neuroses that stem from overly-excessive demands by parents but how does this work in instances in which there is a lack of parental involvement/lack of structure. An example may be a child with a single parent who is addicted to drugs and neglects the child. EDIT: Also, I think that the video title is misleading: it isn't merely an introduction to psychoanalysis but, rather, 'An Introduction to Object Relations Theory as an Offshoot of Psychoanalysis'.
The larger picture, so oft ignored by a chiseled mind, considers the disturbance of the splat background with the interweaving complexity of the material presented. There was a note here about pseudoscience; yes, the brain may squeeze but never conquer itself with apt explanation. This is a good thing.
the mind/brain section which seeks to merge (a version of) psychoanalysis with neuroscience seems crazy to me and unlikely to be very productive either in psychoanalysis or in neuroscience since both will need to be treated in a simplistic/distorted fashion in order to fit with each other. Well, that is how it seems to me :-)
You know that Freud lied about every single one of his "successes", right? Some are invented whole cloth. You describe almost nothing but failures in your own book - of course, not your responsibility, it's always the patient's fault for not submitting to your manipulations and humiliating tactics. What is your real success rate and for how many years on average did you fleece the vulnerable and the suffering?
Every singe one? Lol. I assume you came here with the explicit intent of documenting Dr. Kernberg's failures. Truly unfortunate that your own analysis was unsuccessful. You should have sought Dr. Kernberg's treatment for your aggressive attitude and still unresolved conflicts towards the profession.
@@eecortese yes, every single one. Obviously, you bought Freud's (well documented) lies whole cloth, haven't you? Have you read Kernberg's book, an almost unbroken litany of failures? Maybe you should've sought treatment for your gullibility and a need to submit to authority. Except there's none.
It is difficult to know what to make of these. All one can do is look at one’s own experiences as a child, an adult, a parent and moving closer to one’s mortality. Looking at one’s experiences, I can see no parallels with my experiences of these states. Therefore, I’m strongly inclined to conclude that pscholology and psychoanalysis is at best a pseudoscience and very possibly, in my analysis, a complete load of nonsense. I suspect, those who give it some credibility, are largely the same people whom would be easily hypnotised and subject to irrational persuasion from, for example, religion or advertising or rhetoric. The feeble minded masses.
Firstly, by definition psychology can't be considered to be a pseudoscience because it is research based and structured around the scientific method. Psychological treatment theories are a different matter. Even still, there is significant evidence for the effectiveness of popular treatnent theories - psychoanalysis is not excluded from this. There is extensive data that shows a substantial correlation between therapeutic treatment and reductions in clinical symptoms. If you're serious about making an honest assessment of the efficacy and validity of the science and theories, you absolutely should do additional research.
@@boris3866 Yes, three words, "I smell pseudoscience" was a feeble attempt to belittle a lifetime of Dr. Kernberg's brilliant work and reduce it to a collection of practices mistakenly regarded as being based on scientific methodology, research and practice.
![[UNCUT] รัฐสั่งหยุดปล่อยคลื่น! แต่หยุดพลังปะทุ “น้องหญิง” ไม่ได้ I คนดังนั่งเคลียร์](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RmQh47eIiV0/mqdefault.jpg)
Had to pause the video several times. I can't believe I'm watching a lecture by Otto Kernberg.
Can we just register that Kerberg, to my mind, is 90 years old here. Magisterial!
''Only psychoanalysis really can help these patients, there are no other alternatives when it comes to serious pathology of the subjective experience of love and the integration of love and sexuality in all its forms.'' - Much needed today!
Thank you, Dr. Kernberg. This is a fantastic presentation.
Excellent introduction from one of the preeminent psychoanalytic thinkers.
Wonder what the previous speaker was saying seeing all the eggs and tomatoes on the wall.
This was exceptional, and the simplistic breakdown of complex ideas was very profound.
Thank you, Dr. Kernberg, for sharing your knowledge with us so generously! This is an excellent lecture. The depth of psychodynamic approach to personality is so sorely needed now. Kudos to the IPA for producing such a high-level video and contributing it to TH-cam!
This video is AMAZING. Maybe the best video on psychoanalysis on TH-cam
Yes, as far as theory goes. Treatments are where everything appears to be 🧐😕🙃 inside out, upside down?
The first psychologist I saw when I was 20 in 1968 was a Freudian psychoanalyst. I did not know how blessed and privileged I was. It was better than any of the many other therapy modalities I tried throughout the rest of my life. The next best was by Reichian therapist an adherent of Wilhelm Reich a disciple of Freud.
Kernberg and Twombly , brilliant
Right ear is jealous
Nicely put!
I’m so very happy that theory and clinical cases are explained by eminent psychoanalyst Otto Kernberg.
Thank you Dr. Kernberg for unfolding the subject in such a professional and easy understanding method.
List of Kernberg's "Affect Systems": Attachment system, sexual system, play/affiliation system, fight/flight system, panic system. He implies that each can be identified in the neurobiology/neuroendocrinology of the limbic system.
Thank you Dr. Kernberg !!!
Gotta love all the Twomblies behind him!
I am so thankful for this presentation! I am also thankful for Otto Kernberg. All the best!
Affect stimulating presentation. Thanks IPA & Dr. Kernberg
Great introduction!!! Thank you Dr Kernberg !!!
This was great and very insightful!!! Thank you!.
Extraordinary, thank you very much for such a well structured, usefull explanation.I learned a lot, the mixure with the cases was excellent.I wish all the best, you are a very warmth educated person.
Thank you for sharing a very this content it may mean a lot for someone in need for help. Great lecture.
What a good lecture introducing the vital processes of psychoanalysis
I am the case 2 character. And now I am a father and I doing all the same mistakes. Hopefully I could go to therapy and fix it for my sons future health.
I am case 2 and have a young son as well. I have started and it has helped in major ways.
Good luck you got this man.
Outstanding ! Excelente !
Truly awesome !
Excellent lecture. Demystifies lot of misconception about psychoanalysis, which was looked up on as not evidence based.
This was a great presentation
Thank you Sir.👏👏
amazing, thank you
Thank you!
awesome!!
High quality content.
WHAT A MIND!!!!!!
The artist is Cy Twombly btw
fine to see your ideas
Super Sir..
how many days or months - weeks should the procedure be done?
Lekker bezig otto
Master of the Craft 😮
Is the hypothalamus a structure of the limbic system?
encouraging
I like how he pronounced "dada"
What implications does a lack of parental prohibition(s) during developmental stages have on the ego/superego and potential pathology(ies)? We see in the case studies neuroses that stem from overly-excessive demands by parents but how does this work in instances in which there is a lack of parental involvement/lack of structure. An example may be a child with a single parent who is addicted to drugs and neglects the child.
EDIT: Also, I think that the video title is misleading: it isn't merely an introduction to psychoanalysis but, rather, 'An Introduction to Object Relations Theory as an Offshoot of Psychoanalysis'.
Olie Martin totally agree
❤️🌹
The larger picture, so oft ignored by a chiseled mind, considers the disturbance of the splat background with the interweaving complexity of the material presented. There was a note here about pseudoscience; yes, the brain may squeeze but never conquer itself with apt explanation. This is a good thing.
This is in Munich ?
Subtitles woulb be interesting to whom does not speak english só well.
the mind/brain section which seeks to merge (a version of) psychoanalysis with neuroscience seems crazy to me and unlikely to be very productive either in psychoanalysis or in neuroscience since both will need to be treated in a simplistic/distorted fashion in order to fit with each other. Well, that is how it seems to me :-)
You know that Freud lied about every single one of his "successes", right? Some are invented whole cloth.
You describe almost nothing but failures in your own book - of course, not your responsibility, it's always the patient's fault for not submitting to your manipulations and humiliating tactics.
What is your real success rate and for how many years on average did you fleece the vulnerable and the suffering?
Every singe one? Lol. I assume you came here with the explicit intent of documenting Dr. Kernberg's failures. Truly unfortunate that your own analysis was unsuccessful. You should have sought Dr. Kernberg's treatment for your aggressive attitude and still unresolved conflicts towards the profession.
@@eecortese yes, every single one. Obviously, you bought Freud's (well documented) lies whole cloth, haven't you? Have you read Kernberg's book, an almost unbroken litany of failures?
Maybe you should've sought treatment for your gullibility and a need to submit to authority.
Except there's none.
@@eecortese btw, why would I submit to "analysis", especially to a quack? Sorry he had his way with you. How much did it cost you?
@@mentalitydesignvideo - I consider your POV on the subject nothing more than ephemera. Bye bye!
@@mentalitydesignvideo - Right, dude. In your case, nothing more than what a joint and a bottle of vodka can't fix.
It is difficult to know what to make of these. All one can do is look at one’s own experiences as a child, an adult, a parent and moving closer to one’s mortality. Looking at one’s experiences, I can see no parallels with my experiences of these states.
Therefore, I’m strongly inclined to conclude that pscholology and psychoanalysis is at best a pseudoscience and very possibly, in my analysis, a complete load of nonsense. I suspect, those who give it some credibility, are largely the same people whom would be easily hypnotised and subject to irrational persuasion from, for example, religion or advertising or rhetoric. The feeble minded masses.
Firstly, by definition psychology can't be considered to be a pseudoscience because it is research based and structured around the scientific method. Psychological treatment theories are a different matter. Even still, there is significant evidence for the effectiveness of popular treatnent theories - psychoanalysis is not excluded from this. There is extensive data that shows a substantial correlation between therapeutic treatment and reductions in clinical symptoms. If you're serious about making an honest assessment of the efficacy and validity of the science and theories, you absolutely should do additional research.
I smell pseudoscience...
wow you made everyone reconsider with your insightful argumentation
@@boris3866 I smell an idiot, how about you?
It is your defense and Otto, who is he to you
A naysayer
@@boris3866 Yes, three words, "I smell pseudoscience" was a feeble attempt to belittle a lifetime of Dr. Kernberg's brilliant work and reduce it to a collection of practices mistakenly regarded as being based on scientific methodology, research and practice.