Introduction To Psychoanalysis: Otto Kernberg

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 100

  • @FatimaLasay
    @FatimaLasay 2 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    Had to pause the video several times. I can't believe I'm watching a lecture by Otto Kernberg.

  • @TheVoidDisguised
    @TheVoidDisguised 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    ''Only psychoanalysis really can help these patients, there are no other alternatives when it comes to serious pathology of the subjective experience of love and the integration of love and sexuality in all its forms.'' - Much needed today!

  • @ProfFell
    @ProfFell 6 ปีที่แล้ว +61

    Excellent introduction from one of the preeminent psychoanalytic thinkers.

    • @janbrz
      @janbrz 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Wonder what the previous speaker was saying seeing all the eggs and tomatoes on the wall.

  • @999dayslater
    @999dayslater ปีที่แล้ว +13

    This video is AMAZING. Maybe the best video on psychoanalysis on TH-cam

    • @kirstinstrand6292
      @kirstinstrand6292 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, as far as theory goes. Treatments are where everything appears to be 🧐😕🙃 inside out, upside down?

  • @eugenelewis2249
    @eugenelewis2249 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Thank you, Dr. Kernberg. This is a fantastic presentation.

  • @PaddyVieira4
    @PaddyVieira4 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    This was exceptional, and the simplistic breakdown of complex ideas was very profound.

  • @TheTruthDetector
    @TheTruthDetector 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Incredibly clear and concise lecture by a living legend, Dr Kernberg. Thank you!

  • @Vastbond
    @Vastbond 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Thank you Dr. Kernberg for unfolding the subject in such a professional and easy understanding method.

  • @nancytorresmartinez5977
    @nancytorresmartinez5977 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I’m so very happy that theory and clinical cases are explained by eminent psychoanalyst Otto Kernberg.

  • @SK_TorON
    @SK_TorON 6 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    Thank you, Dr. Kernberg, for sharing your knowledge with us so generously! This is an excellent lecture. The depth of psychodynamic approach to personality is so sorely needed now. Kudos to the IPA for producing such a high-level video and contributing it to TH-cam!

  • @NaomiImoan-rk7iw
    @NaomiImoan-rk7iw 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My appreciation, such a thoroughful introduction on the various newer attempts to cure or at least kind of better sad conditions as those, covered in the explanations of their origin and manifestations of pathological illnesses and the general assumptions of the connections of multiple factors to be covered in treatment modalities and possibilities, in a really special lecture held by one of the most inspireing thinkers of our time..., I'm absolutely grateful to have seen it, it was extremely impressive, to witness the profound and emotional committment of
    Mr. Kernberg and moreover to live to the piont of learning on this theories via such a very dynamic lecture. Thank you, it's only sad, to probably be one of those, to have to go through such conditions... but, thanks for this Video ❤

  • @aussieallstar66
    @aussieallstar66 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The first psychologist I saw when I was 20 in 1968 was a Freudian psychoanalyst. I did not know how blessed and privileged I was. It was better than any of the many other therapy modalities I tried throughout the rest of my life. The next best was by Reichian therapist an adherent of Wilhelm Reich a disciple of Freud.

  • @ladykws
    @ladykws 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I am so thankful for this presentation! I am also thankful for Otto Kernberg. All the best!

  • @madalinahroify
    @madalinahroify 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Extraordinary, thank you very much for such a well structured, usefull explanation.I learned a lot, the mixure with the cases was excellent.I wish all the best, you are a very warmth educated person.

  • @999dayslater
    @999dayslater ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Can we just register that Kerberg, to my mind, is 90 years old here. Magisterial!

    • @TurbulantSynider
      @TurbulantSynider 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We need to know his diet and faily routine ?

  • @paolobene889
    @paolobene889 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great introduction!!! Thank you Dr Kernberg !!!

  • @TheKarlgiovanni
    @TheKarlgiovanni 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you for sharing a very this content it may mean a lot for someone in need for help. Great lecture.

  • @mr.anindyabanerjee9905
    @mr.anindyabanerjee9905 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Affect stimulating presentation. Thanks IPA & Dr. Kernberg

  • @hanifg4834
    @hanifg4834 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing overview of the subject. Thank you for sharing your expertise.

  • @seanroach1994
    @seanroach1994 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Had the honor of working at NYP psychiatric center in White Plains - Dr.Kernberg is one of a kind!

  • @nataliiashesternov3458
    @nataliiashesternov3458 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Thank you Dr. Kernberg !!!

  • @drsamirdjezar830
    @drsamirdjezar830 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What a good lecture introducing the vital processes of psychoanalysis

  • @pkozielski58
    @pkozielski58 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I am the case 2 character. And now I am a father and I doing all the same mistakes. Hopefully I could go to therapy and fix it for my sons future health.

    • @cody_go_create
      @cody_go_create 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I am case 2 and have a young son as well. I have started and it has helped in major ways.
      Good luck you got this man.

  • @Idmoment
    @Idmoment 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What a jewel is Dr. Kernberg- his contributions in understanding human behavior and how we can assist in healing is truly immeasurable. Much gratitude ❤

  • @ivoriangodess1
    @ivoriangodess1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This was great and very insightful!!! Thank you!.

  • @KasaBlanca007
    @KasaBlanca007 4 ปีที่แล้ว +73

    Right ear is jealous

    • @agnieszkanocko1886
      @agnieszkanocko1886 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Nicely put!

    • @LizGammon-n7r
      @LizGammon-n7r 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      2024. Thought I did something wrong in not getting the right ear to hear this.

    • @anhumblemessengerofthelawo3858
      @anhumblemessengerofthelawo3858 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What's the difference between jealousy and envy?
      Jealousy is somewhat natural, it occurs when someone has something you wish you had.
      Envy is where you are willing to injure the person possessing your desire, because they have what you want, and do not have.
      Luckily it's the right that is being deprived and not the left, or we wouldn't hear anything at all....

  • @eliasjereesh
    @eliasjereesh 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent lecture. Demystifies lot of misconception about psychoanalysis, which was looked up on as not evidence based.

  • @EllenGreidinger
    @EllenGreidinger 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    List of Kernberg's "Affect Systems": Attachment system, sexual system, play/affiliation system, fight/flight system, panic system. He implies that each can be identified in the neurobiology/neuroendocrinology of the limbic system.

  • @rimcoeijzenga991
    @rimcoeijzenga991 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Kernberg and Twombly , brilliant

  • @asalane20
    @asalane20 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Gotta love all the Twomblies behind him!

  • @ACJ-u2i
    @ACJ-u2i หลายเดือนก่อน

    I find psychoanalysis so helpful, I whish it was widely known about; for its humanistic way of working.

  • @louisegilbert2713
    @louisegilbert2713 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This was a great presentation

  • @Dionisious1965
    @Dionisious1965 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Outstanding ! Excelente !

  • @albinobeach
    @albinobeach 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The artist is Cy Twombly btw

  • @accordionSWE
    @accordionSWE ปีที่แล้ว

    High quality content.

  • @the_local_bigamist
    @the_local_bigamist 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    What implications does a lack of parental prohibition(s) during developmental stages have on the ego/superego and potential pathology(ies)? We see in the case studies neuroses that stem from overly-excessive demands by parents but how does this work in instances in which there is a lack of parental involvement/lack of structure. An example may be a child with a single parent who is addicted to drugs and neglects the child.
    EDIT: Also, I think that the video title is misleading: it isn't merely an introduction to psychoanalysis but, rather, 'An Introduction to Object Relations Theory as an Offshoot of Psychoanalysis'.

    • @dr.tiazee7114
      @dr.tiazee7114 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Olie Martin totally agree

  • @SanFran4
    @SanFran4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Master of the Craft 😮

  • @ezubkov
    @ezubkov 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    how many days or months - weeks should the procedure be done?

  • @ngurlienchong8323
    @ngurlienchong8323 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you Sir.👏👏

  • @nicholashaines8481
    @nicholashaines8481 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is the hypothalamus a structure of the limbic system?

  • @ollydaman1
    @ollydaman1 ปีที่แล้ว

    amazing, thank you

  • @lesly9101
    @lesly9101 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Truly awesome !

  • @ZiMusta
    @ZiMusta ปีที่แล้ว

    fine to see your ideas

  • @GabrielMacias-v1x
    @GabrielMacias-v1x 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    this is gold

  • @naetek6430
    @naetek6430 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    WHAT A MIND!!!!!!

  • @johnhigson6206
    @johnhigson6206 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The larger picture, so oft ignored by a chiseled mind, considers the disturbance of the splat background with the interweaving complexity of the material presented. There was a note here about pseudoscience; yes, the brain may squeeze but never conquer itself with apt explanation. This is a good thing.

  • @MariaMatvieieva-e8u
    @MariaMatvieieva-e8u 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you!

  • @dusjon
    @dusjon 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Lekker bezig otto

  • @amypasquale8261
    @amypasquale8261 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    awesome!!

  • @ddeenniizz0
    @ddeenniizz0 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is in Munich ?

    • @barbaraha
      @barbaraha 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think you're right, Museum Brandhorst in Munich

  • @priscillagrrr4405
    @priscillagrrr4405 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like how he pronounced "dada"

  • @pauljohnston
    @pauljohnston 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    the mind/brain section which seeks to merge (a version of) psychoanalysis with neuroscience seems crazy to me and unlikely to be very productive either in psychoanalysis or in neuroscience since both will need to be treated in a simplistic/distorted fashion in order to fit with each other. Well, that is how it seems to me :-)

  • @naorembinitadevi8514
    @naorembinitadevi8514 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Super Sir..

  • @jaredthepsychologist5610
    @jaredthepsychologist5610 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    encouraging

  • @monica86209
    @monica86209 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ❤️🌹

  • @lucaswolffmuller4695
    @lucaswolffmuller4695 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Subtitles woulb be interesting to whom does not speak english só well.

  • @mentalitydesignvideo
    @mentalitydesignvideo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You know that Freud lied about every single one of his "successes", right? Some are invented whole cloth.
    You describe almost nothing but failures in your own book - of course, not your responsibility, it's always the patient's fault for not submitting to your manipulations and humiliating tactics.
    What is your real success rate and for how many years on average did you fleece the vulnerable and the suffering?

    • @eecortese
      @eecortese ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Every singe one? Lol. I assume you came here with the explicit intent of documenting Dr. Kernberg's failures. Truly unfortunate that your own analysis was unsuccessful. You should have sought Dr. Kernberg's treatment for your aggressive attitude and still unresolved conflicts towards the profession.

    • @mentalitydesignvideo
      @mentalitydesignvideo ปีที่แล้ว

      @@eecortese yes, every single one. Obviously, you bought Freud's (well documented) lies whole cloth, haven't you? Have you read Kernberg's book, an almost unbroken litany of failures?
      Maybe you should've sought treatment for your gullibility and a need to submit to authority.
      Except there's none.

    • @mentalitydesignvideo
      @mentalitydesignvideo ปีที่แล้ว

      @@eecortese btw, why would I submit to "analysis", especially to a quack? Sorry he had his way with you. How much did it cost you?

    • @eecortese
      @eecortese ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mentalitydesignvideo - I consider your POV on the subject nothing more than ephemera. Bye bye!

    • @eecortese
      @eecortese ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mentalitydesignvideo - Right, dude. In your case, nothing more than what a joint and a bottle of vodka can't fix.

  • @ChrisSargent-f5j
    @ChrisSargent-f5j 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Johnson John Martin Robert Lewis Sharon

  • @ИринаКим-ъ5ч
    @ИринаКим-ъ5ч 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lopez Steven Lopez Steven Clark Margaret

  • @TheAptimn
    @TheAptimn 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    very populistic though

  • @yp77738yp77739
    @yp77738yp77739 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It is difficult to know what to make of these. All one can do is look at one’s own experiences as a child, an adult, a parent and moving closer to one’s mortality. Looking at one’s experiences, I can see no parallels with my experiences of these states.
    Therefore, I’m strongly inclined to conclude that pscholology and psychoanalysis is at best a pseudoscience and very possibly, in my analysis, a complete load of nonsense. I suspect, those who give it some credibility, are largely the same people whom would be easily hypnotised and subject to irrational persuasion from, for example, religion or advertising or rhetoric. The feeble minded masses.

    • @Ziadevil09
      @Ziadevil09 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Firstly, by definition psychology can't be considered to be a pseudoscience because it is research based and structured around the scientific method. Psychological treatment theories are a different matter. Even still, there is significant evidence for the effectiveness of popular treatnent theories - psychoanalysis is not excluded from this. There is extensive data that shows a substantial correlation between therapeutic treatment and reductions in clinical symptoms. If you're serious about making an honest assessment of the efficacy and validity of the science and theories, you absolutely should do additional research.

  • @metincenktas8835
    @metincenktas8835 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I smell pseudoscience...

    • @boris3866
      @boris3866 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      wow you made everyone reconsider with your insightful argumentation

    • @PabloFlores-hs4wu
      @PabloFlores-hs4wu 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@boris3866 I smell an idiot, how about you?

    • @cherihausmann
      @cherihausmann 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It is your defense and Otto, who is he to you

    • @christmas10023
      @christmas10023 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      A naysayer

    • @eecortese
      @eecortese ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@boris3866 Yes, three words, "I smell pseudoscience" was a feeble attempt to belittle a lifetime of Dr. Kernberg's brilliant work and reduce it to a collection of practices mistakenly regarded as being based on scientific methodology, research and practice.