If you are interested in Bulgarian History I highly recomend you to check the Channel Bulgarian Empire Mapping : th-cam.com/video/4A4PpTjn7tQ/w-d-xo.html
Badly done. There was no "Serbia" in the 12th century, only before that. After 12th century the name of the country you are referring to here is "Rascia". Only after Dushan the Strong is it renamed into Serbian Empire. Duklja is referred to as Serbia as often as Rascia is. Also, the Vlastimirovic Serbia extended it's rule over Zachumlia and Pagania, Travunia and Docleia, which you didn't show. Bulgaria was done pretty well tho.
@Mattias Alterschild Untill 1900 never did balkans hate eachother. Never did croats been in war with serbs or bosnians. Bosnia and Serb people did war but some people bc of land and only bc of that. Mostly they were working together or just alon fighting big powers. They started fighting vs eachother after they kicked otomans... And tho ye serbia did fight Bulgarians back in 10 century but those Bulgarians were ruled by Mongolic tribe who idk if even exist today. Today Bulgarian people have same bloodline as every slavic nation in Balkan.
@@Warsawke yes transylvania is not very known though bro. Still a good video. Also I believe just because the Terter dynasty was of partly Cuman origin Bulgaria shouldn't have disappeared on the map
@@KayraAtakanQX yes I know, but they had a Bulgarian identity and were Bulgarian from their maternal side . Also well done on the magyar raids in the 10th century, many people fail to mention them
As a Greek, I have to admit, it was the first time to wait for the Ottomans to appear like a hope just to stop all this dazzling dance between Serbia and Bulgaria coming south to Greece one after the other....i got dizzy
@@IvanSam1 Yes! The slavic migration and later occupation of traditional Byzantine territories by the new slavic countries that tried to be established or replace the Byzantine rule is the theme of those early medieval centuries in the Balkans
@vasilmirmidonski2740 And you should go back to Bulgaria, since that's the language you speak and that's the ethnicity you had all the centuries prior to the last decades. So, arguing that we Greeks, the ones who have the records of all you when you first appeared in the area, we have the records of when you migrated, conquered and settle the lands of Greek people is funny and shows a lot how a much our time period is characterized by a rise of pseudo history and false revisionisms. You have nothing, absolutely nothing to do with the ancient macedonians which were a greek people...we are the natives of our own lands...we never take, we reclaim. So next time you will try to appropriate ancient Greek history and Greek lands, look yourself in the mirror take a breath and dive in in some real history bulgar.
Tsar Dushan gained his influence/power because he was half Bulgarian on his Mothers side from Royalty, and he was married to a Bulgarian princess... The first Serbian Backstab starts with Dushan, and again in 1885
You are both a fantastic example of how stupid and toxic Serbian and Bulgarian nationalism can be. First Dushan had a Serbian identity and that is what matters . All monarchs of medieval Europe were of mixed ethnic backgrounds due to the often practice of diplomatic marriages. Secondly calling the Bulgarians mongol is absolutely brainless. All anthropological analysis on the escavations of the supposedly "Turkic" nobility of the first Bulgarian empire clearly show that these people had an absolutely european phenotype with a small and insignificant Asian admixture. Also the slavs with whom the Bulgars mingled had nothing to do with the Serbs. Especially when you consider that the border of the Serbian principality (tribal Union) was almost 200 kilometers westwards from the region inhabited by the seven slavic tribes.
1. The first records of South Slavs go back to the early 6th century when they were mentioned as raiders and invaders who sacked Toperus and took tens of thousands of "Romans" as slaves. 2. The first recorded supreme ruler of South Slavs was Daurentius/Dervan/Dobreta, mid the 6th century. 3. Montenegro, which was the last vestige of the Medieval Serb state, was never conquered by the Ottoman Empire, officially known as the Prince-Bishopric of Montenegro. 4. Revolutionary Serbia's first state arose as a result of the first Serbian Uprising, and lasted for 9 years, between 1804 and 1813. 5. The Duchy of Croatia and the Principality of Serbia were founded in the early 7th century.
Nice video but when you add countries with 3:31 Banat of Bosnia (Hungary) You could add the 1102 kingdom of Croatia (Hungary) 1527 until 1867 Austria (Habsburgian) and until 1918 (Hungary, dual Austrian-Hungarian monarchy) Croatia was never off the map like Poland, away they were always in personal union
Not entirely true during Austro Turkish wars there was nobody except them (and Montenegro) they had "Vojna krajina" in Austria but it was place where they took all south Slavs as slaves to use in war against ottomans
Few errors are in beginning Dutchy of Croatia was formed in 626. And Kingdom of Croatian in 925. And In the end you used old etchic map form 1991, if not even older beacise there isn't much Italians in istria too Croats make over 90% of Croatia's population today
Wasn't the first bulgarian empire more Turkic rather than Slavic? I mean the leaders controlling the entity were more turkic and later in second bulgarian empire were more slavic?
The greatest obstacle to the empire's revival was the presence to the south ofthe Danube of the Bulgar khaganate with its capital at Pliska and a southern frontier in the Hebros/Maritza valley only three days march from Constantinople. In 780 the Bulgar state had survived in close proximity to Byzantium for almost a century, taking advantage of the empire's internal problems and wars against the Arabs, and this survival had hardened it into an extremely tough political entity. Its Turkic ruling elite combined the military ferocity of the steppe people they had been with the agricultural resource base of the Slav peasantry they dominated and with the skills of civilization acquired from Greek traders, captives, and defectors. Mango, Cyril A. 2002. The Oxford history of Byzantium. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p.172
The Pliska temple may have been in fact a monument erected to commemorate Krum, as the surviving elements of the building are strikingly similar to a number of similar monuments erected for the Turkic qagans in present-day Mongolia. Four other similar structures have been found in Pliska, Madara, and Preslav, all of rectangular or square shape with a north-south or east-west orientation. For the architecture of the “pagan temples” of Bulgaria, see S. Curta, F. (2006). The rise of new powers (800-900). In Southeastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 500-1250 (Cambridge Medieval Textbooks, pp. 111-179). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Further evidence linking the Balkan Bulgar state to Turkic cultural traditions was the nature of the Bulgars' primary settlement at Pliska, with its resemblance to a steppe encampment, and a Bulgar tradition of stone relief carvings and inscriptions found scattered throughout the eastern Danubian Plain. P. Hupchick, D., 2017. The Bulgarian-Byzantine Wars for Early Medieval Balkan Hegemony. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Bulgaria at this time had acquired some traits typical of a barbarian state, because the bellicose tribe of the Bulgars had imported the Turkic traditions of the great steppe into the Balkans. The Old Testament in Byzantium Edited by Paul Magdalino Robert S. Nelson Washington, D.C. :Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection : Distributed by Harvard University Press, c2010. pp. 255
The Pliska temple may have been in fact a monument erected to commemorate Krum, as the surviving elements of the building are strikingly similar to a number of similar monuments erected for the Turkic qagans in present-day Mongolia. Four other similar structures have been found in Pliska, Madara, and Preslav, all of rectangular or square shape with a north-south or east-west orientation. For the architecture of the “pagan temples” of Bulgaria, see S. Curta, F. (2006). The rise of new powers (800-900). In Southeastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 500-1250 (Cambridge Medieval Textbooks, pp. 111-179). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Further evidence linking the Balkan Bulgar state to Turkic cultural traditions was the nature of the Bulgars' primary settlement at Pliska, with its resemblance to a steppe encampment, and a Bulgar tradition of stone relief carvings and inscriptions found scattered throughout the eastern Danubian Plain. P. Hupchick, D., 2017. The Bulgarian-Byzantine Wars for Early Medieval Balkan Hegemony. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Bulgaria at this time had acquired some traits typical of a barbarian state, because the bellicose tribe of the Bulgars had imported the Turkic traditions of the great steppe into the Balkans. The Old Testament in Byzantium Edited by Paul Magdalino Robert S. Nelson Washington, D.C. :Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection : Distributed by Harvard University Press, c2010. pp. 255
The South Slavic tribal groups moved south and southwest from their Pripet homeland, eventually entering the Byzantine-controlled Balkan Peninsula as either allies of or refugees from the invading Turkic Avars during the second half of the sixth century. Their search for a new, permanent homeland proved successful. Today their descendants solidly inhabit virtually all of the northwestern, central, and southeastern regions of the Balkans. Turks comprise a third ethnic component of the Balkan population. Although today numerically small-a little over 1 million people (about 2 percent of the total population) they have played a role in shaping the history of the Balkans far beyond their numbers. In late antiquity the rolling plains of the Danube and Prut rivers in the Balkans' northeast served Turkic tribes from the Eurasian steppes as an open door into the heart of the peninsula and the riches of the Eastern Roman Empire. Huns and related tribes swept through the Balkans in the fifth and sixth centuries, followed by the Avars and their allies in the sixth and seventh. Among these latter were the Bulgars, who established a state south of the Danube. Unlike the Avars, whose settlements in the Balkans proved transitory, the Bulgar state persisted in the face of concerted Byzantine pressures. By the ninth century the Bulgars were challenging the Byzantine Empire for political hegemony in the Balkans, but by that time they also were well on the way toward ethnic assimilation into their Slavic-speaking subject population. The conversion of the Turkic Bulgar ruling elite to Orthodox Chris-tianity at midcentury opened the gate to their rapid and total Slavic assimilation. Within a hundred years of the Bulgar conversion, most traces of their Turkic origins had disappeared, except for their name-the Bulgars had been transformed into Slavic Bulgarians Oğuz, Pecheneg, and Cuman Turkic tribes appeared in the Balkans between the ninth and eleventh centuries. Most of them eventually suffered an ethnic fate similar to the Bulgars and left little lasting impression, although the Gagauz Turks of Bessarabia, a region lying east of the Prut River (now known as Moldova), and some Turks living today in the eastern Balkans may be direct ethnic descendants of those medieval Turkic interlopers. Additionally, the Ottoman Turks' five-century rule over most of the Balkans established numerous scattered enclaves of Turkish- speaking groups throughout much of the southern portion of the peninsula, with a heavy concentration in the southeastern region of ancient Thrace.
@@tonit4233 Population genetic analysis indicated that Conquerors had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-53105-5 hizliresim.com/stAHqu (Bulgar genetic proximity) Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193700/ Thus supporting the view that Tatars may be descendents of ancient Bulgars. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22520580/ Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/250688v1.full Population genetic results indicate that they had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0205920&type=printable However, given the common Turkic genetic background of the Bulgars and Khazars, these ethnicities may be difficult to tell apart either archaeologically or genetically. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2019.12.15.876912v1.full.pdf Population genetic results indicate that they had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193700/ Most Tatars trace their descent to Volga Bulgars, a medieval Turkic people who have inhabited the Middle Volga and lower Kama region. online.ucpress.edu/search-results?page=1&q=Bulgars Caucasus as the first Turkic peoples (Avars, Bulgars, Huns, Khazars, Pechenegs) arrived. www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Exile www.readcube.com/articles/10.1002/9781118455074.wbeoe009 Bulgars (Turkic bulgha-'to mix, stir up, disturb', i.e. 'rebels') A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiungnu and subsequently by warfare between the Rouran/Avar and northern Wei states. in Oliver Nicholson, The Oxford Dictionary of Late Antiquity, Oxford University Press, 2018, ISBN 0192562460, p. 271..
@Brotha Box this place populated much very years ago when slavs come here called Dardania and is part of illyria and about that they are Albanians only the religion change and they wanted Albania
Ancient Macedonian culture and all the other stuff was completley Greek. Modern slavic Macedonians share only name and nothing else despite many of them want to think otherwise. Slavs migrated to the Balkans in 6th century ad so long after ancient Macedonia existed
@Marinko you are wrong, boy. There are 53% Muslims only 31% orthodoxs and 15% catholics. And the population of Orthodox is declinant at the difference of bosniaks that growing every year. It's not good to lie, boy !
and ottoman got served,......from serbian from pashtrovich clan with kniht holding sword and choped tur head in heands on the fammily insignia,....soon we will liberate turkey its ours
What many mappers do not know is Kingdom of Croatia did not end in 1102,it was still legally independent country,with it's own Viceroy (Ban), legislature (Sabor,few years after that in England),coinage,army,laws,church hierarchy, nobility...Royal Hungarian power was never really exercised south of river Sava. This way you missed huge part of South Slavic History. Better luck next time.
We are not Slavs. !!! We are Macedonians like Aristotle philosopher And Alexander the great. The Slavs conquered our homeland. They destroyed our history, our language. Even the names of our cities were made Slavic.!! We are not Slavs. !!!
bu mappinglerde renksiz olan ama isimleri yazan ülkeler neyi temsil ediyor tam olarak, mesela 1:10 da Hırvatistan ,Sırbistan vs mevcut ancak renkli neden değiller
Önemsiz küçük veya Hakkin da hicbir bilgi olmayan (yönetici bayrak vb) demek ama duruma göre farkli anlama da gelebilir kökeni mesela tartışmalı devletler yada kocaman imparatorluklar yanında herseyi belli olmasına rağmen yöneticilerini göstermeye gerek olmacak kadar gereksiz devletler için yada kültürler için de kullanılabilir . Henüz devletesmemis boylar için de kullanılabilir. genelde seyirci anlıyor onu . Duruma gore değişiyor anlayacağın
kardeşim biliyorsun bunları benimde aşırı merakım var ama argumanlara nereden ulaşacağımı bilmediğim için bilgi edinmede eksikler yaşıyorum eğer yorumumu okuyorsan tavsiye verebilirmisin rica etsem ?
Balkanların kederine kökten değiştiren insanlar. Bu arada yazmışken, çok çok ufak bir kusurculuk yapacağım, affola. Gulf of Antalia değil, Gulf of Attalia.
Yes theys are different so didnt show in this video . Bosnians and goranis lived together in southern kosovo . And if you see i showed a white piece in southern kosovo . Theys are goranis .d es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goranis#/media/Archivo%3AKrahina_e_Gor%C3%ABs_(Gora_region).png
Like in the Turkey video, you can see maybe some patches of minorities of South Slavs because as a Bosniak myself living in Germany I know that the countries there are facing decline due to many moving to Germany to seek for a better life. It's sadly the truth that ethnic divisions and corruption are still relevant and nobody cares about it.
En 2020 85,5% bulgares en Bulgarie 83,3% serbes en Serbie 83,1% slovènes en Slovénie 69,8% croates en Croatie 64,2% macédoniens en Macédoine 50,1% bosniaques en Bosnie 45,0% monténégrins au Monténégro In 2020 85,5% bulgarian in Bulgaria 83,3% serbian in Serbia 83,1% slovene in Slovenia 69,8% croatian in Croatia 64,2% macedonian in Macedonia 50,1% bosniak in Bosnia 45,0% montenegrin in Montenegro
Well a lot of info that is gathered is not that exact. For example number of Turks and gypsies in Bularia is higher. In Serbia there is about 300,000 people who did not make a general statement when asked who are they. Slovenia will not recognize minorities so we can only guess. A lot of Croatians left Croatia the second they joined EU. In Bosnia they have calculated even those bosniaks that live outside of Bosnia,and that was a huge issue. And for Montenegro,people say that there are around 40 percent of those who say that they are Montenegrin but around 45 percent say that they speak Serbian.
@@temistogen Slovenia would not recognised minorities? That's bullshit, is more the other way around (looking at Italy, Austria, Hungary and Croatia). Italian and Hungarian minority + Roma people (Gypsies) have special (political) rights because they are autochthonous. They have much more rights than Slovene minority in their national countries. Serbs, Bosniaks and Croatians are not autochthonous in Slovenia, but they are included in statistics.
@@valentintapata2268 no,slovenia does not recognize any of the former yugoslav republic ethnicities as minorities.We don't have our schools,our rights and we are nor recognized.In serbia slovenians have dedicated schools,and much more rights than vice versa.
The true Slavic people in this region-Slovenes, received newcomers on their territory in 7th century and lost most of their territory due to so called brotherhood. Ancient and modern Slovenes, Jurij Venelin, Moscau 1830.
Why did you miss Terter dynasty in Bulgaria? Dynasty had Turk origin but are you sured that there was Turk culture and Terters weren't slavicisated? And you didn't miss period 865-991 when Bulgaria was ruled by Krum's dynasty which had Turk origin as Terter dynasty. And Tsardom of Bulgaria was ruled by German dynasty.
It isnt same . German Dynasty just ruled country but turkic-nomadic countries is different others . Dynasty for state in Europa but state for Dynasty in nomadic countries . The kut faithy is base of nomadic empires. we using when searching central asian nomad history . Kut faithy id confusing topic you can research . But i can say terter Dynasty impressed bulgaria . It is symbol of cuman dominance on balkans. It is important for turkic history and not bulgarian state .
@@KayraAtakanQX I mean that Lower Pannonia existed in 846-875 and had such territory en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality_of_Lower_Pannonia#/media/File:Count_Kocel's_territories.PNG And Duchy of Pannonian Croatia existed in 790-900. You subscribed Pannonian Croatia as Lower Pannonia but it is other state. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duchy_of_Pannonian_Croatia
@@KayraAtakanQX Carantanian Slavs formed a majority in Carantania, Lower Panonia and Carniola (another principality, which you didn't show). They soon came under rule of Bavarians and Franks, some of them were part of Nitra and Great Moravia. Their descendants are Slovenes, Kajkavian Croats and minorities (+assimilated people) in Italy, Austria, Hungary and Croatia. Slovenian language is a mix between West Slavic and South Slavic, South Slavic component being stronger.
@@papazataklaattiranimam and no they didn't destroyed byzantine empire the did take a lot of terratory from it but never destroyed it like Byzantium did
Macarların kurucu unsuru olan on kabileden yedisi fin-ugor, üçü türk-ogur kökenli. Hristiyanlık resmi din olduktan sonra yerel slav, cermen ve rumen unsurlarıyla karışım olmuş. Moğol istilası ve osmanlı fetihleri yüzünden nüfusları inanılmaz derecede düştüğü için genetik payları Volga çevresinden biraz uzak. Ama Sekellerde belirgin
din değiştirmekle alakası yok Gagavuzlar Altaylar Yakutlar Çuvaşlar Tuvalılar Hakaslar müslüman değil ama Türk sayılıyorlar çünkü konuştukları dil Türkçe gelenek ve görenekleri Türk ayriyetten Türk olduklarını kabul ediyorlar Ama Bulgarlar ise Türk olduklarını kabul etmiyorlar biz slavız diyorlar hatta Türklerden nefret ediyorlar ayriyetten konuştukları dil Türkçe değil Slavca ve gelenek görenek leri Zaman içinde Slavlaşmış bu yüzden Bulgarlar Türk kabul edilmiyor farklı bir dine mensup olmalarıyla alakalı değil yani😉
If you are interested in Bulgarian History I highly recomend you to check the Channel Bulgarian Empire Mapping :
th-cam.com/video/4A4PpTjn7tQ/w-d-xo.html
I'm curious about Bulgarian empire but the rulers is between if they did rule or not
Badly done. There was no "Serbia" in the 12th century, only before that. After 12th century the name of the country you are referring to here is "Rascia". Only after Dushan the Strong is it renamed into Serbian Empire. Duklja is referred to as Serbia as often as Rascia is. Also, the Vlastimirovic Serbia extended it's rule over Zachumlia and Pagania, Travunia and Docleia, which you didn't show.
Bulgaria was done pretty well tho.
We are interestig of history of Albania, can yo do something about that?
@@gilbertkasnija7085 i did it
@@KayraAtakanQX ok thank you,, can you give me a link, please?
South Slavs: *exists*
Peace between them: *Am I joke to you?*
@Mattias Alterschild Untill 1900 never did balkans hate eachother. Never did croats been in war with serbs or bosnians. Bosnia and Serb people did war but some people bc of land and only bc of that. Mostly they were working together or just alon fighting big powers. They started fighting vs eachother after they kicked otomans... And tho ye serbia did fight Bulgarians back in 10 century but those Bulgarians were ruled by Mongolic tribe who idk if even exist today. Today Bulgarian people have same bloodline as every slavic nation in Balkan.
Ban is that something to be proud?
You Did it! Amazing work!
He has mistakes for example the Transylvania :/
Ok
@@Warsawke yes transylvania is not very known though bro. Still a good video. Also I believe just because the Terter dynasty was of partly Cuman origin Bulgaria shouldn't have disappeared on the map
@@historyrhymes1701 thanks brother !
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terter_dynasty
@@KayraAtakanQX yes I know, but they had a Bulgarian identity and were Bulgarian from their maternal side . Also well done on the magyar raids in the 10th century, many people fail to mention them
Play at 144p for full South Slavic experience
5:32 top ten anime deaths
How do you make these videos so fast?
....
Wait... Do you have some mapper supernatural super powers? 🤔
I working very hard
He is a super hero
Her ayrı medeniyet için ayrı ayrı müzik koyup bu videoyu yaptığın çok teşekkür ederim
OK SUBSCRIBE
@@KrasnodarMappingUmbreon251 Yes
@@kafkasedits09 waow
@@thehollandian ne oldu reis
EfeliBall görünce şaşırdım jsjsjs
As a Greek, I have to admit, it was the first time to wait for the Ottomans to appear like a hope just to stop all this dazzling dance between Serbia and Bulgaria coming south to Greece one after the other....i got dizzy
Haha that’s funny from a serb/croat/bulgar. Love 🇬🇷
@@SonnySlavic haha but is true. Serbia and Bulgaria were ultra energetic during the medieval times.
Love them all 🇭🇷 🇧🇬 🇷🇸
I understand but during the middle ages north and central parts of Greece were inhabited by significant Slavic population.
@@IvanSam1 Yes! The slavic migration and later occupation of traditional Byzantine territories by the new slavic countries that tried to be established or replace the Byzantine rule is the theme of those early medieval centuries in the Balkans
@vasilmirmidonski2740 And you should go back to Bulgaria, since that's the language you speak and that's the ethnicity you had all the centuries prior to the last decades.
So, arguing that we Greeks, the ones who have the records of all you when you first appeared in the area, we have the records of when you migrated, conquered and settle the lands of Greek people is funny and shows a lot how a much our time period is characterized by a rise of pseudo history and false revisionisms.
You have nothing, absolutely nothing to do with the ancient macedonians which were a greek people...we are the natives of our own lands...we never take, we reclaim. So next time you will try to appropriate ancient Greek history and Greek lands, look yourself in the mirror take a breath and dive in in some real history bulgar.
South Slavs: Peace was never an option
Her zamanki gibi ellerine sağlık!
3:34 That's hot
1:42 ah that is hot aswell
2:21 dmitar zvonimir's kinda hot doe
Tsar Dushan gained his influence/power because he was half Bulgarian on his Mothers side from Royalty, and he was married to a Bulgarian princess...
The first Serbian Backstab starts with Dushan, and again in 1885
You are both a fantastic example of how stupid and toxic Serbian and Bulgarian nationalism can be.
First Dushan had a Serbian identity and that is what matters . All monarchs of medieval Europe were of mixed ethnic backgrounds due to the often practice of diplomatic marriages.
Secondly calling the Bulgarians mongol is absolutely brainless. All anthropological analysis on the escavations of the supposedly "Turkic" nobility of the first Bulgarian empire clearly show that these people had an absolutely european phenotype with a small and insignificant Asian admixture. Also the slavs with whom the Bulgars mingled had nothing to do with the Serbs. Especially when you consider that the border of the Serbian principality (tribal Union) was almost 200 kilometers westwards from the region inhabited by the seven slavic tribes.
ahahhahahahah nisam jedini iz Juge koji gleda ovog Turcina
Nice video! Greetings from Serbia!
This is actually very well made! Thanks!
6:00 ДОК ЈЕ СРБА КРАЈИНЕ БИЋЕ 🇷🇸🇷🇸🇷🇸
lošu je demografiju uradio
nema tolkomakedonaca u grčkoj srba u hrvatskoj i srba u crnoj gori
Matija S ni dobru teritoriju dusanovog carstva al ajde
takoe
@@knez7057 заборавио је остатак света
İzlemeden like attım Kayra bey kesinlikle güzel bir videoyonuz dur eminim :)
First Bulgarian Empire is Bulgar Turkic empire not slavic bro
It could be both like Safavids were both Turkic and Persian.
belli bir yerden sonra slavlaşıyor zaten türk olduğu kısmı videoya koymadım.
Kayra Atakan [Qırım Xan'ı] keşke hiç koymasaydın 😿
Kayra Atakan [Qırım Xan'ı]
Slavlaşınca slav olmaz ki ya :/ ona kalırsa yuan çinlileşti çinli devleti mi oldu
Lethean
Bulgar Kağanlığı olarak da bilinir
Nobody:
Bulgaria: *I like holes in my country* 5:57
Macedonia too
@@amko123 ΜΑΚΕΔΟΝΊΑ IS GREEK NAME. 2500 YEARS. YOU ARE SLAVES. VARDARSCA IT'S YOUR NAME. OK?
@@s.g.w.agrinio6538 dude chill wtf
Yeah,those holes are the leftovers of Ottomans
turks living in this holes mostly
Reis yine döktürmüş eline sağlık
Video is awesome, thanks bro.
1. The first records of South Slavs go back to the early 6th century when they were mentioned as raiders and invaders who sacked Toperus and took tens of thousands of "Romans" as slaves.
2. The first recorded supreme ruler of South Slavs was Daurentius/Dervan/Dobreta, mid the 6th century.
3. Montenegro, which was the last vestige of the Medieval Serb state, was never conquered by the Ottoman Empire, officially known as the Prince-Bishopric of Montenegro.
4. Revolutionary Serbia's first state arose as a result of the first Serbian Uprising, and lasted for 9 years, between 1804 and 1813.
5. The Duchy of Croatia and the Principality of Serbia were founded in the early 7th century.
❤️
Bosnia also had an uprising freeing the territory of todays BiH and Sandzak eyalet from Ottomans rule 1832-34
Slovenia is a joke to you too!
Nice bro Keep it up And go ahead
Proud to be South Slav and Serb!
Greetings to all friendly people. :))
Proud to be.. wait im not Slav lol
Greetings :)
Nice video but when you add countries with 3:31 Banat of Bosnia (Hungary)
You could add the 1102 kingdom of Croatia (Hungary) 1527 until 1867 Austria (Habsburgian)
and until 1918 (Hungary, dual Austrian-Hungarian monarchy)
Croatia was never off the map like Poland, away they were always in personal union
yea i agree, ban Kulin of Bosnia wrote to Dalmatia in 1189 but from this map he wrote to Hungarian empire lol
Not entirely true during Austro Turkish wars there was nobody except them (and Montenegro) they had "Vojna krajina" in Austria but it was place where they took all south Slavs as slaves to use in war against ottomans
1400ler gelir
Osman abi: Helo
Gazi Osman Paşa lan
nE
Kendi kendine ne yaşıyorsun
ᏗᏕᏦ ne bilm
OTTOMAN EMPİRE aynı kişi değiliz
Slava! from Poland ! great video
Sonuna kadar bekle emeginin karsiligini alacagina inaniyorum
Few errors are in beginning
Dutchy of Croatia was formed in 626. And Kingdom of Croatian in 925.
And In the end you used old etchic map form 1991, if not even older beacise there isn't much Italians in istria too
Croats make over 90% of Croatia's population today
i doubt that he will see this
4:30 beautiful song
izlemedim ama yine çok güzeldir hitit tarihinide yaparmısın
Hitit tarihi ne oglum akfksjf
@@user-op8gi2rp6u araştırda gel
@@gokturkmapperbmo5800 Hititlerin map videosu yapilacak düzeyde bir tarihi olmadığını bilmiyormusun? O zaman ARAŞTIRDA GEL
@@user-op8gi2rp6u ben şunu söyledim hititler anadoluda kurulmuş bir uygarlık sen mapper üzerinden yapılamaz diyorsun onu biliyoruz
@@gokturkmapperbmo5800 Ben hitit uygarliği yok demedim, hititlerin ele alınacak bir tarihi yok dedim. Ama sen Ota boka atlarsan böyle olur.
Wasn't the first bulgarian empire more Turkic rather than Slavic? I mean the leaders controlling the entity were more turkic and later in second bulgarian empire were more slavic?
Yes
The greatest obstacle to the empire's revival was the presence to the south ofthe Danube of the Bulgar khaganate with its capital at Pliska and a southern frontier in the Hebros/Maritza valley only three days march from Constantinople. In 780 the Bulgar state had survived in close proximity to Byzantium for almost a century, taking advantage of the empire's internal problems and wars against the Arabs, and this survival had hardened it into an extremely tough political entity. Its Turkic ruling elite combined the military ferocity of the steppe people they had been with the agricultural resource base of the Slav peasantry they dominated and with the skills of civilization acquired from Greek traders, captives, and defectors.
Mango, Cyril A. 2002. The Oxford history of Byzantium. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p.172
The Pliska temple may have been in fact a monument erected to commemorate Krum, as the surviving elements of the building are strikingly similar to a number of similar monuments erected for the Turkic qagans in present-day Mongolia. Four other similar structures have been found in Pliska, Madara, and Preslav, all of rectangular or square shape with a north-south or east-west orientation. For the architecture of the “pagan temples” of Bulgaria, see S.
Curta, F. (2006). The rise of new powers (800-900). In Southeastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 500-1250 (Cambridge Medieval Textbooks, pp. 111-179). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Further evidence linking the Balkan Bulgar state to Turkic cultural traditions was the nature of the Bulgars' primary settlement at Pliska, with its resemblance to a steppe encampment, and a Bulgar tradition of stone relief carvings and inscriptions found scattered throughout the eastern Danubian Plain.
P. Hupchick, D., 2017. The Bulgarian-Byzantine Wars for Early Medieval Balkan Hegemony. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Bulgaria at this time had acquired some traits typical of a barbarian state, because the bellicose tribe of the Bulgars had imported the Turkic traditions of the great steppe into the Balkans.
The Old Testament in Byzantium Edited by Paul Magdalino Robert S. Nelson Washington, D.C. :Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection : Distributed by Harvard University Press, c2010. pp. 255
The Pliska temple may have been in fact a monument erected to commemorate Krum, as the surviving elements of the building are strikingly similar to a number of similar monuments erected for the Turkic qagans in present-day Mongolia. Four other similar structures have been found in Pliska, Madara, and Preslav, all of rectangular or square shape with a north-south or east-west orientation. For the architecture of the “pagan temples” of Bulgaria, see S.
Curta, F. (2006). The rise of new powers (800-900). In Southeastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 500-1250 (Cambridge Medieval Textbooks, pp. 111-179). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Further evidence linking the Balkan Bulgar state to Turkic cultural traditions was the nature of the Bulgars' primary settlement at Pliska, with its resemblance to a steppe encampment, and a Bulgar tradition of stone relief carvings and inscriptions found scattered throughout the eastern Danubian Plain.
P. Hupchick, D., 2017. The Bulgarian-Byzantine Wars for Early Medieval Balkan Hegemony. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Bulgaria at this time had acquired some traits typical of a barbarian state, because the bellicose tribe of the Bulgars had imported the Turkic traditions of the great steppe into the Balkans.
The Old Testament in Byzantium Edited by Paul Magdalino Robert S. Nelson Washington, D.C. :Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection : Distributed by Harvard University Press, c2010. pp. 255
smartest kebab fr 💀
The South Slavic tribal groups moved south and southwest from their Pripet homeland, eventually entering the Byzantine-controlled Balkan Peninsula as either allies of or refugees from the invading Turkic Avars during the second half of the sixth century. Their search for a new, permanent homeland proved successful. Today their descendants solidly inhabit virtually all of the northwestern, central, and southeastern regions of the Balkans.
Turks comprise a third ethnic component of the Balkan population. Although today numerically small-a little over 1 million people (about 2 percent of the total population) they have played a role in shaping the history of the Balkans far beyond their numbers.
In late antiquity the rolling plains of the Danube and Prut rivers in the Balkans' northeast served Turkic tribes from the Eurasian steppes as an open door into the heart of the peninsula and the riches of the Eastern Roman Empire. Huns and related tribes swept through the Balkans in the fifth and sixth centuries, followed by the Avars and their allies in the sixth and seventh. Among these latter were the Bulgars, who established a state south of the Danube. Unlike the Avars, whose settlements in the Balkans proved transitory, the Bulgar state persisted in the face of concerted Byzantine pressures. By the ninth century the Bulgars were challenging the Byzantine Empire for political hegemony in the Balkans, but by that time they also were well on the way toward ethnic assimilation into their Slavic-speaking subject population. The conversion of the Turkic Bulgar ruling elite to Orthodox Chris-tianity at midcentury opened the gate to their rapid and total Slavic assimilation. Within a hundred years of the Bulgar conversion, most traces of their Turkic origins had disappeared, except for their name-the Bulgars had been transformed into Slavic Bulgarians
Oğuz, Pecheneg, and Cuman Turkic tribes appeared in the Balkans between the ninth and eleventh centuries. Most of them eventually suffered an ethnic fate similar to the Bulgars and left little lasting impression, although the Gagauz Turks of Bessarabia, a region lying east of the Prut River (now known as Moldova), and some Turks living today in the eastern Balkans may be direct ethnic descendants of those medieval Turkic interlopers. Additionally, the Ottoman Turks' five-century rule over most of the Balkans established numerous scattered enclaves of Turkish- speaking groups throughout much of the southern portion of the peninsula, with a heavy concentration in the southeastern region of ancient Thrace.
Good job @Kayra Atakan
Han " Kayra Atakan"
HEDEF:TÜM DÜNYA HALKLARININ TARİHİ
Which Language Is This
@@MonaSalehianTurkish 🇹🇷
Perfect!
Emegine saglik
Azerbaycandan hepinixe selam 🇦🇿🇹🇷
salam qardaş
Great job but Transylvania was taken in 960-970s
Is not
@@KrasnodarMappingUmbreon251 It is. 900 Is to early.
Every mapper does the same mistake :/
I LIKE CONTENT OF EEVEE
ı saw your comment before ı make this video about this but it is like that according to my sources (centennia historical atlas & Wikipedia)
6:04: Ah yes good old 1990's statistics
yeah that demographics are a bit off
@@matijas7994 dobre su
The Demographics are way off. There are no Slav majority areas in Greece
0:25 deki şarkının adı ne abi
Amazing video and well put historical facts! Greetings from Serbia!
Huns and Bulgars were great Turkic nomads
They had iranian names such as Asparukh and also slavic names such as Malamir and Presian, they were barely turkic by the 8th century.
@@tonit4233 nah
Look
Word of Bulgar is Turkic come from verb of Turkic bulga-(today Turkish=bula-)
As you said they were , they aren't turkic anymore
@@altaiccultureandlanguage6184 it could be perfectly well deriving from bulgeron- an eastern Iranian word meaning person coming from the outskirts
@@tonit4233
Population genetic analysis indicated that Conquerors had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars.
www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-53105-5
hizliresim.com/stAHqu (Bulgar genetic proximity)
Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193700/
Thus supporting the view that Tatars may be descendents of ancient Bulgars.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22520580/
Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs.
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/250688v1.full
Population genetic results indicate that they had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars.
journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0205920&type=printable
However, given the common Turkic genetic background of the Bulgars and Khazars, these ethnicities may be difficult to tell apart either archaeologically or genetically.
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2019.12.15.876912v1.full.pdf
Population genetic results indicate that they had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193700/
Most Tatars trace their descent to Volga Bulgars, a medieval Turkic people who have inhabited the Middle Volga and lower Kama region.
online.ucpress.edu/search-results?page=1&q=Bulgars
Caucasus as the first Turkic peoples (Avars, Bulgars, Huns, Khazars, Pechenegs) arrived.
www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Exile
www.readcube.com/articles/10.1002/9781118455074.wbeoe009
Bulgars (Turkic bulgha-'to mix, stir up, disturb', i.e. 'rebels') A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiungnu and subsequently by warfare between the Rouran/Avar and northern Wei states. in Oliver Nicholson, The Oxford Dictionary of Late Antiquity, Oxford University Press, 2018, ISBN 0192562460, p. 271..
3:34 yeah boii
Great video!!! 🇷🇸 ❤️ 🇲🇪🇧🇦🇭🇷🇲🇰🇧🇬
maded by a turk SRB
@@KayraAtakanQX 💪💪
@Brotha Box this place populated much very years ago when slavs come here called Dardania and is part of illyria and about that they are Albanians only the religion change and they wanted Albania
@@veljkoobradovic8170 💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪💪
*How medieval ads look like: **1:25*
😂
Maşallah bulgara bak
@@ZeytinciDevleti I don't understand you
Отлично! Как всегда лайк!
Это что за карта Европа или азия
i think u did demographics a bit wrong but overall its 100/10 im so happy someone finaly made something like this!
Harika Bir Video Daha
A question. Was the culture, Gods, names, mythology of the ancient Macedonians similar to Slavs or Similar to Greeks?
I want your answer.
Ancient Macedonian culture and all the other stuff was completley Greek. Modern slavic Macedonians share only name and nothing else despite many of them want to think otherwise. Slavs migrated to the Balkans in 6th century ad so long after ancient Macedonia existed
video çok güzle olmuş eline sağlık
Where do you get all of your Maps and Info? (Your Channel is Amazing man, Keep going!)
Wow Good video bro. In sha Allah Bosnians muslims will are a majority in their country the Bosnia!
@Marinko you are wrong, boy. There are 53% Muslims only 31% orthodoxs and 15% catholics. And the population of Orthodox is declinant at the difference of bosniaks that growing every year. It's not good to lie, boy !
And how are you going to do that ?
İ just love this
You want to say that Bulgaria is the biggest country on the Balkans? This was unexpectedly...
Was*
@@ZeytinciDevleti As we see it is still the biggest
Bulgaria is a bit small. 110 thousand km
1496: Ottoman has joined the server
Everybody else: Has left the server.
and ottoman got served,......from serbian from pashtrovich clan with kniht holding sword and choped tur head in heands on the fammily insignia,....soon we will liberate turkey its ours
@@igorjajic6898 ? No Slav lives in Turkey,only European part of Turkey has double population compared to Greece,so its hard..
Amazing work! That nations map in the end was really interesting.
Can you make a video about Greece/Rum Empire?
carantania yı görünce aklına karantina gelen tek benmiyim evet tek benim
Aaa sen olmasan farketmezdim (Dalga Geçmiyorum cidden)
Benimde aklıma o geldi valla
helen heryerdisn aw
The Hollandian dldldldlsls
@@kafkasedits09 efeliball senmisin
WORLD's best mapper
:/
I want be world's best mapper
sorry you are worlds best mapper too
POZDRAV IZ HRVATSKE SLAVENSKOJ BRACI‼🇭🇷
Привет из Казахстана, бывшего субъекта Российской империи.
I’m half bosnian (slavic) hello 👋
1- haritaları kendinmi yapıyon yoksa sitelerdenmi alıyon
2-güzel mapping yapmanın sırrı ne
3-zaman sayaçına çok vakit harcıyorum ne yapmalıyım cevap verirsen sevinirim (Qırım Xan'ı)
1. Duruma göre değişiyor
2. Bunun Hakkin da bir video yapacağım
3. Evet zaman alıyor ve almaması için kolay yolu var
@@KayraAtakanQX 3. nün kolay yolu nedir ?
Missed movement of 1 serbian uprising, and second serbian empire of Jovan Nenad 1526
5:01 Bulgaristan'a Dİmetoka'nın "hediye" edilmesi
What many mappers do not know is Kingdom of Croatia did not end in 1102,it was still legally independent country,with it's own Viceroy (Ban), legislature (Sabor,few years after that in England),coinage,army,laws,church hierarchy, nobility...Royal Hungarian power was never really exercised south of river Sava. This way you missed huge part of South Slavic History. Better luck next time.
It still existed yes. On paper the kingdom was in personal union with Hungary, but in reality it was really a vassal.
We are not Slavs. !!!
We are Macedonians like Aristotle philosopher And Alexander the great.
The Slavs conquered our homeland.
They destroyed our history, our language.
Even the names of our cities were made Slavic.!!
We are not Slavs. !!!
It was under Austro Hungarian control and at one point lost its name and treated all slavs as slaves but yeah he took it off of map before he should
Круто, хорошее видео
everybody gangsta till serbia form an empire
and then collapse
st3f4n
greece was replaced with serbia.
yine harika
oha adam taramalı tufek gibi video atıyor
😂😂aynen
bu mappinglerde renksiz olan ama isimleri yazan ülkeler neyi temsil ediyor tam olarak, mesela 1:10 da Hırvatistan ,Sırbistan vs mevcut ancak renkli neden değiller
Önemsiz küçük veya Hakkin da hicbir bilgi olmayan (yönetici bayrak vb) demek ama duruma göre farkli anlama da gelebilir kökeni mesela tartışmalı devletler yada kocaman imparatorluklar yanında herseyi belli olmasına rağmen yöneticilerini göstermeye gerek olmacak kadar gereksiz devletler için yada kültürler için de kullanılabilir . Henüz devletesmemis boylar için de kullanılabilir. genelde seyirci anlıyor onu . Duruma gore değişiyor anlayacağın
Çok güzel güngör yazıcıoğlu videosu
insanlar yanlış anlayabilir bence bu yorumu
@@KayraAtakanQX bişi olmaz kanka .d
How do you upload so fast?
How do you research, trace, draw and animate so quickly within weeks?
It takes me weeks to complete videos.
ı working very hard.
@@KayraAtakanQX Nice it is very impressive. Good luck on your journey to 100,000 subs! 🇵🇰🇹🇷
kardeşim biliyorsun bunları benimde aşırı merakım var ama argumanlara nereden ulaşacağımı bilmediğim için bilgi edinmede eksikler yaşıyorum eğer yorumumu okuyorsan tavsiye verebilirmisin rica etsem ?
Bulgar devleti o zamanda mı slavlaşmıştı?
865 den sonra slavlasiyor
Yine mükemmel bir video izlemekten sıkılmam
Nobody:
Slavs in 1500 year:
Balkanların kederine kökten değiştiren insanlar.
Bu arada yazmışken, çok çok ufak bir kusurculuk yapacağım, affola.
Gulf of Antalia değil, Gulf of Attalia.
günümğzde gulf of antalia olarak geçiyor. Belki antik siminden bahsediyor olabilirsin
@@KayraAtakanQX Antik isminden Bahsediyorum. Ya Attalia, yada Antalia. İkisini bulamışsın sanki biraz.
I like your ethnic maps, but aren't Goranis different?
Yes theys are different so didnt show in this video . Bosnians and goranis lived together in southern kosovo . And if you see i showed a white piece in southern kosovo . Theys are goranis .d
es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goranis#/media/Archivo%3AKrahina_e_Gor%C3%ABs_(Gora_region).png
@@KayraAtakanQX they r all serbian tribes,.....
@@KayraAtakanQX Goranis are just Muslim Slavs
@@KayraAtakanQX Ne saçmalıyorsun? Attığın sitede bile Goranilerin Bir Güney Slav halkı olduğunu yazıyor zaten.
I tought that Albanians are Slavs too but seems that i mistaken! Great work
eline sağlık
Like in the Turkey video, you can see maybe some patches of minorities of South Slavs because as a Bosniak myself living in Germany I know that the countries there are facing decline due to many moving to Germany to seek for a better life. It's sadly the truth that ethnic divisions and corruption are still relevant and nobody cares about it.
The slavomacedonian communities in Greece are minorities not majorities. They are less than 1% of the popoulation
En 2020
85,5% bulgares en Bulgarie
83,3% serbes en Serbie
83,1% slovènes en Slovénie
69,8% croates en Croatie
64,2% macédoniens en Macédoine
50,1% bosniaques en Bosnie
45,0% monténégrins au Monténégro
In 2020
85,5% bulgarian in Bulgaria
83,3% serbian in Serbia
83,1% slovene in Slovenia
69,8% croatian in Croatia
64,2% macedonian in Macedonia
50,1% bosniak in Bosnia
45,0% montenegrin in Montenegro
Well a lot of info that is gathered is not that exact.
For example number of Turks and gypsies in Bularia is higher.
In Serbia there is about 300,000 people who did not make a general statement when asked who are they.
Slovenia will not recognize minorities so we can only guess.
A lot of Croatians left Croatia the second they joined EU.
In Bosnia they have calculated even those bosniaks that live outside of Bosnia,and that was a huge issue.
And for Montenegro,people say that there are around 40 percent of those who say that they are Montenegrin but around 45 percent say that they speak Serbian.
@@temistogen Slovenia would not recognised minorities? That's bullshit, is more the other way around (looking at Italy, Austria, Hungary and Croatia). Italian and Hungarian minority + Roma people (Gypsies) have special (political) rights because they are autochthonous. They have much more rights than Slovene minority in their national countries. Serbs, Bosniaks and Croatians are not autochthonous in Slovenia, but they are included in statistics.
@@valentintapata2268 no,slovenia does not recognize any of the former yugoslav republic ethnicities as minorities.We don't have our schools,our rights and we are nor recognized.In serbia slovenians have dedicated schools,and much more rights than vice versa.
@Fg 98 nobody really knows how much people live in Bosnia and on unrecognized Kosovo.
Ragusa respublikasi?
I like Serbian national anthem🇷🇸
The true Slavic people in this region-Slovenes, received newcomers on their territory in 7th century and lost most of their territory due to so called brotherhood. Ancient and modern Slovenes, Jurij Venelin, Moscau 1830.
Bulgarians are originally Turkish.
No. Turkish are orign mongol/African mix
@@PAVLOVICDORDESERBIA The Turks brother with mongols.But African people have no relations with Turks
A mix of Turkic and Slavic that kinda became its own ethnicity
Turkic*
@@PAVLOVICDORDESERBIAu serb nvggas are also persian or arab.
You got something wrong towards the end, the leader of the Republic of North Macedonia is Stevo Pendarovski.
It is only mistake and it is not my mistake i used wikipedia . Wikipedia showed this.
@@KayraAtakanQX
Understandable.
Why did you miss Terter dynasty in Bulgaria? Dynasty had Turk origin but are you sured that there was Turk culture and Terters weren't slavicisated? And you didn't miss period 865-991 when Bulgaria was ruled by Krum's dynasty which had Turk origin as Terter dynasty. And Tsardom of Bulgaria was ruled by German dynasty.
It isnt same . German Dynasty just ruled country but turkic-nomadic countries is different others . Dynasty for state in Europa but state for Dynasty in nomadic countries . The kut faithy is base of nomadic empires. we using when searching central asian nomad history . Kut faithy id confusing topic you can research . But i can say terter Dynasty impressed bulgaria . It is symbol of cuman dominance on balkans. It is important for turkic history and not bulgarian state .
Krums Dynasty is turkic but it slavized after 865
1:41 Bulgarların en büyük yüz ölçümü
Merhaba, ben Kazakım, Kazak tarihini yap lütfen
Genel olarak Türk tarihi yaptı onu izleyebilirsin kardeşim :D
Ben de Kırgızım.Ve profillerimiz aynı hanedandan .d
@@Aizen.Sousuke230 😂👍
Who are the Uzes? I cant fknd anything about them
Thanks my Turkish friend
@Sultan Süleyman I owner is turk
@Sultan Süleyman I :( no
@Sultan Süleyman I if istria is italy then turks should leave anatolia LOL
güzel olmuş
Sonunda hesabina erisebilmissin :)
@@KayraAtakanQX hesabım var da pcye geçemiyorum hep :/ telefonda da açık değil hesap ama sağol yine de
You showed Carantania but did not show Principality of Lower Pannonia although it was Carantanian principality.
I showed lower pannonia pls look again .
@@KayraAtakanQX it had other borders and other years of existence unlike video about West Slavs.
@@alexangelo1998 pannonians and carantanians arent west slav it video is correct other video is wrong.
@@KayraAtakanQX I mean that Lower Pannonia existed in 846-875 and had such territory en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality_of_Lower_Pannonia#/media/File:Count_Kocel's_territories.PNG
And Duchy of Pannonian Croatia existed in 790-900. You subscribed Pannonian Croatia as Lower Pannonia but it is other state. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duchy_of_Pannonian_Croatia
@@KayraAtakanQX Carantanian Slavs formed a majority in Carantania, Lower Panonia and Carniola (another principality, which you didn't show). They soon came under rule of Bavarians and Franks, some of them were part of Nitra and Great Moravia. Their descendants are Slovenes, Kajkavian Croats and minorities (+assimilated people) in Italy, Austria, Hungary and Croatia. Slovenian language is a mix between West Slavic and South Slavic, South Slavic component being stronger.
Why did you make it seem like Bulgaria randomly spawned out of nowhere in the end of the 800’s meanwhile it was there since the 650’s…
7th century Balkan Romans and Illyrians- why do I hear boss music?
Ama İlk Bulgar İmparatorluğu zamanında Bulgarlar Türk değilmiydi
Rafael Aktaş evet
Zaten belli zamana kadar ilk Bulgar imparatorluğunu Slav olarak göstermemiş
zaten o kısmı koymadım.
Hayır Türk olanlar Volgada kaldı
@@kadirmestoglu5984 1. Bulgar imp. Da 865 yılına kadar türk
Byzantium : you mean the history of the BARBARIANS
Turkic Bulgars destroyed Eastern Romans many times
@@papazataklaattiranimam I mean byzantine empire called them barbarians
@@papazataklaattiranimam and no they didn't destroyed byzantine empire the did take a lot of terratory from it but never destroyed it like Byzantium did
@@dkgamers1385 Turks were horror story of Romans
@@papazataklaattiranimam turks were scary especially turkic tribes like the kumans
Abi hatırladığım kadarıyla Macarlar gibi Bulgarlar da türktü.
Din değiştirdikleri için Türk saymıyor beyfendi aynısını Türkler için de söylediğimizde kuduruyor ama 😂
Mesut Yeseni Burada dikkat edersen 1. Bulgar İmparatorluğunun belli bir kısmı yok yani slavlaşmış hâlini koymuş
Tengrici olmayan tüm kabilelere türk değil diyelim hatta müslümanlara arap budistlerede tibetli diyelim
Macarların kurucu unsuru olan on kabileden yedisi fin-ugor, üçü türk-ogur kökenli. Hristiyanlık resmi din olduktan sonra yerel slav, cermen ve rumen unsurlarıyla karışım olmuş. Moğol istilası ve osmanlı fetihleri yüzünden nüfusları inanılmaz derecede düştüğü için genetik payları Volga çevresinden biraz uzak. Ama Sekellerde belirgin
din değiştirmekle alakası yok Gagavuzlar Altaylar Yakutlar Çuvaşlar Tuvalılar Hakaslar müslüman değil ama Türk sayılıyorlar çünkü konuştukları dil Türkçe gelenek ve görenekleri Türk ayriyetten Türk olduklarını kabul ediyorlar Ama Bulgarlar ise Türk olduklarını kabul etmiyorlar biz slavız diyorlar hatta Türklerden nefret ediyorlar ayriyetten konuştukları dil Türkçe değil Slavca ve gelenek görenek leri Zaman içinde Slavlaşmış bu yüzden Bulgarlar Türk kabul edilmiyor farklı bir dine mensup olmalarıyla alakalı değil yani😉
Isn’t it time to put the name of the music you use in the description?
It is in description already :/
Donau Bulgaria is establishet coutry with borders and capital city from 681 year :) corect that video pls