HMAS Adelaide L01 - The ship changes Australian naval power
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ก.ย. 2024
- Commissioned in 2015, the HMAS Adelaide is the second of two Australia's Landing Helicopter Dock carrier. This ship and her sister HMAS Canberra are the largest ships ever built for the Royal Australian Navy.
----------------
military-wiki.com is the official website of Dung Tran Military
----------------
In case you want to donate to me - I have a Paypal account:
www.paypal.me/...
Become a Patreon:
/ dungtranmilitary
Even the smallest amount of money is your great encouragement for me.
-----------------
Thank you very much.
Best regards
Dung Tran.
So glad you added that little coda about "Bushfire Assist" (7:58) earlier this year! These giant ships did not take long to come in useful. I see them often at their base in Sydney Harbour and they always make me proud. They weren't commissioned to face down China but called for many years before, because Australia found that taking East Timor back from Indonesia in '99 hit a real bottleneck when it came to landing the troops and their equipment. However you're right- the next action they see may well be aimed against China. We'll see... A part of me is almost excited to see that happen.
Hi Will, thank you so much :)
Adelaide is a good name, they spend so much footie time beating each other up there they have hardly any time to train .. folks don't mess with Adelaide :-)
Ozzy Ozzy oi! oi! oi! : )
Your english Is Good and its easy to Understand well done
Well presented 👍
Nice work, thank you👌🏻
Canberra class or the juan carlos class are the best suited ships for indian navy's 4 multipurpose support vessel programme. Hope difenece accusations Council will quickly clear this new tender and 6 p75i submarines .
Hey Mr. Tran, could you do a video of the Boeing Loyal Wingman 5.Gen Drone? Thank you and stay making videos!!! They are very interesting!!
leo cr yes
When these ships were officially welcomed to our navy my first thought was they were small aircraft carriers for F 35B's or similar, currently there has been no indication from our government as to whether or not they plan to acquire F 35B's maybe we will learn more over time, the ski jump ramp on the bow must have a purpose, as it closely resembles many other carriers throughout the world.
Could it be so we can integrate more with the U.S. Marines and British Navy giving them backup landing, rearmament and refueling platforms for their F 35B's during joint operations.
Thank you for your posts Dung I enjoy learning from your channel keep up the great work please👍cheers from 🇦🇺
The Australian Navy already has F-35s in their naval fleets. However, in 2016 a headline broke out saying "They don't work!!" They are currently being repaired by the Navy. For now, enjoy your helicopters.
The reason for the ski jump is because changing the design will be more expensive.
@@walker68175 we don't own any F35B's only F35A's , but in the future you never as times are changing fast .
@@paulbaker9277 Spain operate in Juan Carlos I 12 Harrier II Plus, and are waiting 10 F35B in few years.
I have been saying that same thing about the jump ramps! Evidently the Australian navy plans on buying some of the F35'S for these ships because someone would have to be awfully careless with money to build jump ramps and not use them! I watched the British Aircraft Carrier launch airplanes and retrieve them and they don't use a lot of space during the launch or landing and these 2 Australian carriers can do exactly the same thing!!!! Australia has to be planning to either buy some of the F35'S or maybe even plan on building their own jump jets! The Harrier is just to slow to compete in today's world against the fighters that are out today! The Harrier is good for attacking land base targets but it cannot compete against the fighter aircraft in today's military! I've always thought that Australia would buy one or two of the old United States carriers until these 2 were built!
Very informative. Thanks!
Well thought asset for the Aussy Navy. Good video content.
Turkey has just built another of these under license from Navantia of Spain...
Yes and i heard that Turks wants two in the next years
They are a good ship. Did Turkey design there's for helicopter carriers or for jump jets?
@@nathan-ck3je this Spanish LHD design licensed by Turkey is ready to operate both helicopters and VTOL aircraft such as Harrier or F-35.
get some F35 B Lightnings on these floating targets ffs
Get to it then.
Very informative!
Useful ships these, I know the Aus government has no plans to put 35s on these but would the decks be heat rated for them if they wanted the jets? Might be wrong but didn't the Japanese have to uprate the decks of their helicopter carriers to handle the F35?
Greetings to our old sports enemy from 🇬🇧.....luv Aussies really!
To update both ships would cost $1b...
I don't believe all the Australian government says
F35b could land and take of these ships,with little modes .
They would have to be modified to allow the use of F35Bs. Spanish JC1 is fitted with that kind of deck to operate with the Harriers, but Australia doesn't have that need. The Ski jump is there because it would have been more expensive to redesign than to just leave it there. Salud
Great vid, Cheers!
excellent vid. also, "elite" is pronounced "ee-leet". Adelaide is 'ad-ell-aid'
Thank you so much. I read it wrong all the time :))
Dung Tran Military np if you want someone to help proof-listen to your narration before posting let me know
Great videos as always Dung...Greetings from Indonesia
Hi bro🥰
... Its maximum speed will be 21.5 knots (in "light aircraft carrier" configuration) or 29 knots (in "LHD" configuration)... source: Wikipedia.
I find a 29 knot top speed on these big tubs hard to believe. Only our destroyers move that quickly.
Pretty good translation
Ok here's what I don't understand? The ship has a jump ramp which is used for launching either Harriers or F35's but everyone keeps saying that the ship doesn't launch airplanes! So why build jump ramps on the ships if there were never any plans to launch airplanes from the Jump ramps? That's the question! Whoever designed the ships had to have been thinking about launching airplanes one day if not launching them now! The Harrier and the F35'S both could launch and land on these ships hell you could even land regular fighter aircraft as long as the ship has catch wires like on other carriers!!! If anyone knows please let me know?
Good question. I doubt they would make it like that ‘just in case’. They must have a plan for something.
@@ok88warrior exactly!!!!
This is such an old furphy. When the Australian Navy told Navantia "we don't need the ski jump, this is just for helicopters," the shipbuilder told them "that would need a redesign which would take longer and cost more," so our Navy said "Fine, just leave it in." The government did commission a study into converting them to handle F-35s but the costs turned out to be prohibitive. Moreover, the Army doesn't want to give up any space to fast jets on these things because they've filled it with their vehicles already, from trucks to tanks to armoured cars to transport and attack helicopters. The ski jumps look cool- that's their only contribution- along with the fact they inspire the question "Why no planes?"
videowilliams ____ They are also useful if they undertake any joint ops with the US Marines, who fly the 35b. They have been training on the British carriers too. Basically everyone's navies just become an UBER for the Yanks.
@@burlatsdemontaigne6147 The Flight Deck Coating won’t handle the heat from F-35Bs while landing, they would need to be recoated with the same sort of coating you will find on the USN LHDs and the British and Italian Carriers, unless that happens you wont see them on the Canberra’s
These are Amphibious Transports for deploying the Australian Army, the RAN sail them yes but its the Army who the capability is for. they are a Army requirement not a Navy one. There is no intention of using them as an Aircraft Carrier, that would take away to much of there intended role away. And with a top speed of 21kt and nowhere near enough Aviation Fuel Bunkerage, nowhere near enough Ammunition Storage for Missiles and Bombs they would make poor Aircraft Carriers.
And yet the Spanish use this design, as light aircraft carries.
@@steveascension9626 Yes so what, they used to have a proper Carrier, the Principe de Asturias and they have Harrier Jump Jets in Service, they had to get rid of the Carrier due to Cost Cutting measures, the JC1 was not intended as a replacement for the Carrier but they can’t afford to replace the Principe de Asturias and they still have the Harriers so they fly the them off the JC1 to maintain the capability but they do have a requirement for a real Carrier. Its little more then a Trg capability and they have not yet ordered the F-35B and the Harriers are getting very long in the tooth.
@@steveascension9626 Australia can use them for aircraft jump jet carrier also. Just Australian version was decked out as a helicopter carrier amphibious assault ship not a jump jet. For Australia to turn it into a jump jet carrier. We will have to change some internal design that our defence requested when it was built and change the upper deck aswell. Then it will leave Australian army without a capability that they will need to require again. So it will be better for Australia to build a entire new ship if we need aircraft carrier
The reason why Australian army requests these 2 ships is that they can get 8000 men and equipment to anywhere in the pacific very quickly.
If there is a war with China never send these ships into the China sea. Because they will be sitting ducks with out air protection & their present level of self protection armament. Landing troops at Surfers Paradise should be OK.
Exactly. They make perfect LHD for army offshore offensive capability. If Australia require a aircraft carrier they would go for something larger similar to what South Korea is building now. But would have F35C and loyal wingman drones. Not F35B that have a small payload and range... Jump jets I think is good for army not for Air force or Navy. The range are just to short. I think the UK made a huge mistake by taking that on. They will have to bring there aircraft carriers close to the combat zone for aircraft to be affective. It puts the navy crew at risk from land based missile. As the carrier and ships protecting the carriers is taking advantage away of the stealth aircraft. The enamy will know they coming as they have to bring the carriers as close as 600km to the strike range or risk the aircraft running out of fuel. F35B has only 1600km range.
It can carry f35 jets too,who needs a carrier :)
Yea but to convert both ships to be able to withstand the heat from its jet engine would cost $1B and our goverment is stingy as fuck when it comes to ADF spending. At max capacity like nothing byt f-35s how many could a Canberra class hold?
@@jedilordlog8543 Because Australia didn't require them for that role. They are a LHD helicopter carrier. Not required for jump jet carrier role. It was a requirement for the Australian army not navy
@@nathan-ck3je went from the modern missile navy to a taxi service lmao
Can u do a video of malaysia navy latest lms ship and figrate
It just got disabled
Sure would be handy if they put 5-8 f-35b on each of these boats. That would give the Chi-coms something to think about.
LHD Juan carlos primero have 12 Harrier II plus
@@larrymccoy5394
Yes, but Australia uses the f-35, not the harrier. Adding some b models would make sense, considering the current southeast Asian situation.
@Nick Bennett
Ya right, like your opinion makes those things more useful than F-35Bs.
Absolutely none of those things you say are more effective than two aircraft carriers, nor could you buy near that many for the cost of 16 airframes (there's two of them boats.)
Nah Brian cant see that happening
@@alexlanning712
It was hypothetical.
so what you are saying is that apart from a few machine guns the vessel is basically unarmed. not a war ship more a humanitarian aid ship. it can't even defend itself. typical australian stingyness. trying to save money. stop calling it a war ship. ski ramp that will NEVER see any use or action.
👍😎🍺🍩🚢🚢
philippines should have bought this rather than the crap brp jose rizal
What's the point of an Amphibious Assault Ship if there are no smaller warships to protect it against Surface, air, and underwater threats and besides it's pretty expensive for the Philippine Navy.
@@rain-vo8ib brp jose rizal is inferior and over priced
@@NEY-uu3lx ok thank you
@@NEY-uu3lx I don't think the Philippines is ready to have a helicopter carrier yet, or even one with fixed wing aircraft. I just don't think the Navy can handle operational costs, the training of new crews and buying actual jet fighters.
Jose Rizal is ok, at least for now. It is semi stealth and a missile capable frigate (the first in Manila's fleet actually). I gotta agree though, it IS overpriced. But, I think these frigates are a better approach to enforcing in the South China Sea. I don't really see a helicopter carrier scaring China too much. I mean, they have 2 carriers already. The second one is operational actually.
@@walker68175 i mean hms adelaide
What this ship need is good old fashioned Harriers. Maybe even 8 per ship plus spares and trainers would be enough to give the fleet at least a credible air component. Forget the naval F35. The Harrier might be old but there are upgraded English versions or the much loved US Marines AV6B. It's reliable with good capabilities. Having these ships equipped with only helicopters seems a waste and if anything a danger to the task force they operate with. Without an air component these ships are sitting ducks. Harriers proved their worth in the Falklands and the US navy swears by them. How many Harriers can be bought for the price of an F35 ?
Harrier are old and outdated. If Australia wanted a jump jet they would go with the F35B. The LHD was Army requirements not for Navy. It was designed to get Australian army and equipment for offensive capability. Jump jets don't have much range and it would given our defence less capabilities and would had made Australia require another LHD for the army.
If Australia wanted to go for a fixed wing aircraft carrier they would require larger ship than these LHDs. And would purchase the F35C not the B variants.
There is talk for a actual aircraft carrier in the future.but will probably go with something that South Korea is building now.. I was told the next defence white paper 2025 will require a fixed wing aircraft carrier. That's if it happens.They still have a problem with our subs getting built
@@nathan-ck3je After buying these two landing ships from Spain, 66 F35s, 12 French submarines and paying people to stay home for months during covid 19 plus 5,500 ventilators so where is the money coming from which is why i think Harriers are a reasonable solution. Who is Australia likely to fight ? Indonesia, Vietnam, China ? More than likely all the previously mentioned hardware will last to it's use by date without firing a shot in actual combat. Those F35s have huge operating and maintenance costs ..... are they worth it ? The salesmen would claim YES.
We trade peacefully with Indonesia and Vietnam, China is more problematic but even a modest collection of deterrent that we might acquire is no match for them in a serious conflict so why spend so much. So far it's accumulating debt for generations .... the main beneficiaries are bankers and arms manufacturers. Surely this country has more urgent priorities. Get the nation working and producing ...... China is no longer a reliable trade partner.
Sorry mate, I can’t understand your English for the life of me. Probably worth paying someone who can speak fluent English if you want to successfully communicate in English.
Thank you. I have improved on recent videos. hope to please you.
@@DungTranMilitaryBlog Do not worry about such criticism. I can see that your English has slowly improved over time and have always enjoyed your videos 👍
@@killbot86 Thank you
@@DungTranMilitaryBlog Very welcome mate 👍
Bullshit.stick with it,you get better all the time.I don't think people who have complained now how to speak more than one language.