The Eurofighter Typhoon: Any Aircraft, Any Mission
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ก.ย. 2024
- To get a 1 year supply of immune-supporting Vitamin D3K2 & 5 travel packs FREE with your first purchase! - go to athleticgreens...
Got a beard? Good. I've got something for you: beardblaze.com
Simon's Social Media:
Twitter: / simonwhistler
Instagram: / simonwhistler
This video is #sponsored by Athletic Greens.
Love content? Check out Simon's other TH-cam Channels:
Biographics: / @biographics
Geographics: / @geographicstravel
Warographics: / @warographics643
SideProjects: / @sideprojects
Into The Shadows: / intotheshadows
TopTenz: / toptenznet
Today I Found Out: / todayifoundout
Highlight History: / @highlighthistory
Business Blaze: / @brainblaze6526
Casual Criminalist: / thecasualcriminalist
Decoding the Unknown: / @decodingtheunknown2373
To get a 1 year supply of immune-supporting Vitamin D3K2 & 5 travel packs FREE with your first purchase! - go to athleticgreens.com/megaprojects
Can I get a 1 year supply of Eurofighter Typhoons instead?
@@MohanSharma-tp3xe))w
Add time. Time to role a smoke and get another beer. :)
Although only getting called generation 4.5, the Typhoon is a great example of what a 5th generation fighter would look like if stealth wasn't an issue and you only cared about brute force and turning fights.
yet what is scary about that, is how the gap between gen 4 and gen 5 is so insanely wide. Where the typhoon is possibly the best of the gen 4's, still doesn't realistically stand a chance against any gen 5. Unless you get a stupid ROE like in vietnam, which heavily resisted range engagements. Thus almost nullfiying the advantages of the f4 with all their missiles.
@@ALegitimateTH-camr Well let's look at your claim a little closer for a minute, shall we?
Germany is currently operating Hensoldt's passive TwinVis Radar which has demonstrated that it has no difficulties tracking F-35s at distances over 250km.
A Typhoon armed with 6 A/2A missiles can outrun, out climb, out dive, out accelerate and out turn F=35 all day long.
The Typhoon can already carry the MBDA Meteor unlike the F-35 which will have to wait until 2027. So, this leaves the Typhoon with having a much greater weapons range than then F-35.
Place both aircraft over Europe, Germany especially, and the F-35 will be certainly and reliably be detected and tracked there!
This in turn then allows the German Typhoon(s) to dictate engagement of the F-35 at will. And because of the Typhoons networking capabilities it even enables the Typhoons to engage the F-35 from well outside of the F-35s weapons range!
The F-35 on the other hand cannot outrun the Typhoon to get away, and it cannot chase a running Typhoon to close up on it to bring it within the F-35s weapons range.
Yeah, stealth is great as long as it works... but acceleration, climb rate, speed, and superior weapons range are also pretty darn great things to have as well.
@@tomwoggle9411 good thing the f22 does our air superiority
@@tomwoggle9411 Good thing they are both on the same side then.
@@tomwoggle9411 since that’s a ground based radar that would only apply over Germany then correct? If the air war is being fought in your skies you’re already behind the power curve.
"The center of gravity shifts backwards"
No, that is the center of pressure. The center of gravity couldn't care less whether the plane flies above or below the speed of sound.
While I think you are correct, I think it might have just been easier for lay people like myself to understand.
Most of us general population have at least a sense of what center of gravity is, but not center of pressure.
Not criticising your comment, just postulating that it might not have been a mistake
@@Ryan-lk4pu The matter is also a bit more complicated in some planes. For example in the SR-71, the aerodynamic changes are so great that in order to maintain stability, fuel needs to be pumped to different tanks in the plane depending on speed. This is called "trimming". Thus they do change the center of gravity to reflect the aerodynamic changes, but I doubt this is also necessary in the Typhoon.
@@Ryan-lk4pu there's no point in being easy to understand if you're wrong. (Man it's hard to be polite sometimes, how can you be such a fool?).
I think it would be yet better to refer to centre of lift. Aerodynamic drag has it's own, different, centre of pressure. There must also be a centre of pressure in yaw - which must also move significantly over the aircraft's speed range.
As the aircraft increases its speed, center of pressure/lift moves forward. That makes an aircraft more stable and less maneuverable. So he did a mistake, but in a way that concept is still explained correctly. Only it is not center of gravity moving backwards towards center of pressure, but center of pressure moves forward towards center of gravity
This jet has a special place in my heart since when i was young my father made some of the software for it :)
Nice. My mate's Dad built some of the avionics :)
It's up there in terms of practicality, it doesn't seem bloated like the Super Hornet. In terms of just plain coolness you can't beat the B58 Hustler though.
My brother in law also worked on it and is still involved with the project.
After my pop-pop passed away my dad found a letter of commendation for “being instrumental in the development of the engines for the XF-15 program”.
My dad was the chef at the factory and he has a letter saying his cooking is the best
I recently went to an air show which saw displays from a Eurofighter Typhoon, an F-16, and a Rafale. While all three were mindblowingly loud, the Eurofighter was noticeably the least loud. And then an F-35 briefly turned up and demonstrated its hover functionality… which proved to be, by far, the loudest noise I’ve ever heard!
Was that RIAT by any chance?
@@maximnolan8151 Cosford. :)
@@SouthDunedain I was there. That Paddy O'Hare who flew the Typhoon was so boring. He produced the lamest, most subdued, non-aggressive Typhoon display I have ever seen. The Rafale and F16 pilots, on the other hand, really gave it some.
@@BedtimeStoriesChannel I must admit, I remember being more impressed on other occasions, but equally I've only previously seen the Typhoon display in isolation, so I put it down to that. The paint scheme and display with the Spit made up for it though!
@@SouthDunedain I do like the colours, but Paddy did not push his Typhoon whatsoever. He went for a more "graceful" display.
Cheaper to run per hour than some soccer players in England.
And footballers don't even run that fast. And they only operate about 90 minutes per week. And they like to eat grass as much as cows.
More useful as well 😆
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 plus their teams defence is FAR superior ..........
Probably break down less as well.
the price for the F35 includes the cost of design and development costs. Also, comes with missiles and bombs and targeting pods and multiple parts and maintenance training and pilot training. so yeah, buying the other fighter(s) is cheaper upfront then buying the F35. However, maintenance training and pilot training and extra pods and missiles does not come with the purchase. Not to mention no spare parts and no spare engines. The F35 also comes with an extra engine. And the cost per hour is high on the F35 because the cost to keep the stealth fully capable is expensive. When there is just a chip or Crack on paint or panel, the entire section has to be replaced and repainted. And when a tiny tiny tiny gap forms from pulling Gs, that entire section has to be replaced and repainted. That is mostly why the cost per flight hour is so high on the F35.
I live in Darwin Australia, and we get many different Military aircraft, just the other day I saw my first Typhoon. B1 Bombers B52's even B2's, seen on regular basis. F15s well basically every aircraft in the US inventory but the F117 and the A10, I have even seen Airforce1. We get to see Mig29's and recently the Japanese J2 for the first time. With a huge Military bombing range. that the sound barrier can be broken over. Currently we have the Pitch Black air exercise in progress.
Our indian Su-30 MKI are also there for pitch black.
I'm sure that port that's leased to China is also enjoying the planes 😁
With Pitch Black '22 going on at the moment, I'm jealous I'm on the other side of the country
At least there is something cool about living in Darwin!
That sounds brilliant! Lucky man 👍
As someone who has worked in jet engine maintenance for 30 years, I can safely say they are the best and easiest engines to work on in i have come across, in battlefield conditions this aircraft would be back in the air quicker than any other hands down. The f35 on the other hand requires over 10 hours of maintenance per hour of flight, and there are currently over 200 mothballed because the maintenance issues in them are too huge
Will we see the return off the harrier aha ;)
Would love to see a Gripen with EJ200 tbh
Is it more expensive than other aircrafts? Everyone seems to complain about that, but given your comment i'd suppose it needs less man-hours, isn't it?
Much of that maintenance is spent on the stealth coating. The ceramic replacements being tested should eliminate most of that.
@ It's cheaper, in the long run. Spain's recent acquisition round of the Typhoon came at around 100M per unit compared with Germany's 240M per F-35. These figures are the money governments allocate to their airforces for their respective aircraft projects, so it includes the price of the aircraft and all of the maintenance and spare parts and training.
One of my teachers at college is an ex-RAF engineer, and he sings this thing’s praise constantly. He has fond memories of it melting runways in Kosovo and Afghanistan.
The Typhoon wasn't deployed to Kosovo
@Orbital_Inclination just looked it up and you right, I must've confused his Afghanistan stories with his Kosovo ones.
Maybe he was talking about Tornado.
The average total cost per flying hour for a (RAF, at least) Typhoon is circa £11k, though take off will also cost £11k. So a 1h flight is £22k, a 2h flight 33k etc.
Hi , please may i ask, does this include all the staffs wages and also the fuel?
That's about right. It includes all amortised cost of parts. research development maintenance fuel and training. We can even include cost of sortie in there too such as when a missile is fired.... Goes up a bit then
the price for the F35 includes the cost of design and development costs. Also, comes with missiles and bombs and targeting pods and multiple parts and maintenance training and pilot training. so yeah, buying the other fighter(s) is cheaper upfront then buying the F35. However, maintenance training and pilot training and extra pods and missiles does not come with the purchase. Not to mention no spare parts and no spare engines. The F35 also comes with an extra engine. And the cost per hour is high on the F35 because the cost to keep the stealth fully capable is expensive. When there is just a chip or Crack on paint or panel, the entire section has to be replaced and repainted. And when a tiny tiny tiny gap forms from pulling Gs, that entire section has to be replaced and repainted. That is mostly why the cost per flight hour is so high on the F35.
That price includes the shit ton of fuel these things consume. That's expensive too these days.
In case of war, I can support a 1h:45m flight with my bank account
The Typhoon is impressive. While in Kuwait, the Italian AF would basically give an impromptu airshow demonstration whenever they took off. Absolutely ridiculous how well the plane can manuever.
Love the Typhoon, spent 19 years building and developing sub systems of the Captor radar in Edinburgh. the improvements in the M-scan system over the years were amazing, the new AESA upgrade is a leap forward.
Where did you build that?
@@DonWan47probably bae systems in Glasgow but not to sure I think he can only say a few things because he was working in a classified facility
@@Jakob.n.h180 No it’s not classified.
Around 4:05, you mention, that the aircrafts center of GRAVITY shifts towards the back of the plane. That´s plainly wrong: the center of LIFT moves backwards when crossing the sound barrier, since the aerodynamics changes dramatically when exceeding Mach 0.99, while the weight distribution does not change at all (ignoring minor changes due to fuel consumption). As far as I remember, I already mentioned that effect in a comment concerning the video about the XB-70 Valkyrie...
Other than fuel consummation it is impossible for ballast/weight to physically move across an airframe.
What you are describing is the center of mass not gravity. Center of mass is kept the same, while aerodynamic load changes shift the center of gravity.
You’re absolutely correct. When it goes supersonic, the aerodynamic center of the aircraft changes due to how supersonic aerodynamics differ from subsonic.
I read this.
Thank you, I was about the point that out myself.
Love the Eurofighter, though I would have expected the video to be a little more in-depth about the development process. For example France dropping out of the program to develop the Rafale jet or the fact that the Eurofighter originally was supposed to be launched in 1990.
Yes. And also the British Aerospace EAP (Experimental Aircraft Programme) used as a flying platform to research and develop technologies to be used in Eurofighter. The EAP aircraft looks like the Typhoon, canards, delta wing and all, but with a tail fin and engines from the Tornado.
Yeah, I know nothing about this plane, but just the change in the countries developing it, and the arguing over why does what, sounded like a more interesting video to me, but was glossed over in one sentence.
Agreed. I love this plane, but the fact that they had to change the name was always noteworthy. Possible comparisons with the Rafale?
This whole episode feels so half-assed. The story about the SAC is especially bad. To paraphrase: I was working next to a jet fighter without ear defenders and it hurt my ears. And?
It's a shame that the French were such backstabbing slimes and stole much of the "innovative designs" that the Rafael "developed" from the Eurofighter design process.
You always need to watch your back around the french, else you'll find them on the enemy side using all of your technology to benefit them.
@@Reinforce_Zwei That's is a pretty serious accusation which has no merit nor substance. France did not stole any "Innovative design" from Eurofighter. Rafale end up to be very different compare to Eurofighter design with close coupling canard design (Gripen share the same architecture) versus Eurofighter canard much further away from delta wings.
French pull out of the program mainly due to the divergence of the aircraft role. France want a multi-roles aircraft with capability of aircraft carrier operation (Rafale-M). Eurofighter was design from the beginning to be mainly an air superiority fighter (Which is ironic because Eurofighter later began the multirole function upgrade program initiated by UK from 2014).
Other considerations such as the use of M88 instead of EJ200, separation of air intakes and hiding of turbines for reduce RCS ultimately means France has to develop its own fighter design.
Ultimately, if you want to give such serious accusation. You better back it up with some concrete evidence. What did France stole from Eurofighter? Also keep in mind that Rafale flew before Eurofighter for both prototype and final production aircraft which does not back your statement!
If you want to talk about stolen design then the only concrete example will be China J11, J15, J16 copycat of Sukoi 27, 30 and 35.
I can vouch for the wall of sheer noise from the Eurofighter. I live and work under RAF Marhams flightpath. Now i know what some of you are thinking "But Eurofighters aren't stationed at Marham", but once a year they have a family day RAF air show at the base, and this year i watched the Red hours skimming the tree's on my drive home past the base which was just out of this world, so much so i almost veered into a hedge lol.
When compared to the F35 they are quiet, the F35 is just obnoxiously loud! I didn't think a jet could be louder than the Tornado when coming into land, but i was very, very mistaken. When the F35 goes into VTOL you can hear the engine spool 3 miles away.....
That’s because when landing, a Tornado’s engines are throttled back as it’s trying to fly slowly. Whereas during a vertical landing, an F-35B engine is operating at full, or near full throttle, as it’s mainly the engine thrust that is providing the lift rather than the wings.
They’re frequently taking off and landing at BAE Warton and it always seems to be a day I want a lie in.
The F-22 is generally considered the most advanced A2A fighter at the moment due to its wacky thrust-vectoring maneuverability and of course its stealth capabilities. Sneakiness aside however, in joint training exercises the Typhoon is known to be able to hold its own just fine against the F-22 in a dogfight. Stealth tech is a clear advantage but not necessarily a guarantee of victory, and it's not like the Typhoon doesn't have a few solid tricks for reducing its own signature as mentioned in the video. Glad the Typhoon is on our side.
The typhoon was only able to hold its own when it and the raptor had very unrealistic setups that neutralized the raptors greatest features. The raptor had fuel tanks on the wings and lots of fuel which caused it to lose aerobatic maneuverability and stealth. The fights were also WVR fights so stealth was taken away. The eurofighters had nothing except guns and some fuel which meant that this fight with these loadouts would never happen unless the eurofighters left base with no missiles and that means they would just get shot down.
absolutely stunning aircraft and my personal favorite
cannot wait to fly it in DCS
Or war thunder
I remember the 2016 air France incident. My younger brother was stationed at RAF Coningsby at the time and he face timed me as the typhoons were taking off. Can confirm that those ej200 engines are LOUD, not only after face time with my brother. But also after seeing them at the RAF Coningsby open day in July 2016, performing manoeuvres for the crowds, and at the mach loop in 2017!
having heard the Eurofighter take off and the F35... the F35 is louder! The loudest jets at take off that I have heard were the Concorde.... my house windows vibrated, and the Avro Vulcan
@@adriaandeleeuw8339 b1s, f111s, and b52s
@@usonumabeach300 Australia had its own F111s the F111C
there is a B52 and an F111c on static display at the Darwin Aircraft museum
I remember seeing it demonstrated at the RAF Cosford airshow, when they were just coming into service. Must've been about 2004 I think. It was the last display of the day, and me and a school mate were sat on the roof of my dad's car waiting for it... The Typhoon came over at high speed and banked sharply away, briefly turning both lit afterburners towards us. I remember the car physically shook with the noise, it was unbelievable.
I've always had a fondness for the Eurofighter since I was a kid. One of the first PC games I had was a Eurofighter flight sim. I never really understood how advanced it was, or the speed and agility it has.
Doesn't even compete with the Rafale...Get back to Sonic...
I also played EF2000 from DID! The game, the jet, the MANUAL. Memories
@@ferdinanddestouches3085 Rafale doesn't even compete with the F22/F35... See how stupid that sounds?
Nobody cares if there's a better plane. The Typhoon, Rafale and Raptor are all amazing planes. It's not always about who's best.
@@ferdinanddestouches3085 typical french arrogance, that's why the germans beat the hell out of you in WWII.
@@corvobatarin6785 Sure, nobody cares about the cost, and pressure of a decaying US administration. Just No-one....SO, just let choose the most expensive, the least capable and the one we can't manage to feat to our needs....F-35! expensive, inaccurate, failed without any date for supposed availability, F-15-EX-prefered, in a few words : shitty as fuck!
why were Independence class failed? why do the F-22 won't survive B-52? why Zumwalt was such a blatant fail???
Can you ever imagine a shitty as fuck program like F-35 be anytime and anyhow bye successful???
Thanks NATO, the US is still able to buy shitty material....
Thannks to remind us that Nato is just another way to expensively sell european nations useless material....
I love jets with canards! They're cool+ more lift developing surfaces? Yes please
They add more drag and weight plus hurt stealth ability.
@@actionjksn they don't necessarily add more weight, but they do add more lift (and in turn more drag). this allows them to fly slower, and with higher alpha, making them much more capable in a 1 circle dogfight. they also have better nose authority, making them better in just about every aspect of a dogfight, as they have greater ability to point their nose at their bandit regardless of their direction of travel.
Same!
They aren’t canards. They are foreplanes. There is a difference. 👍
I remember a whole bag of controversies when the EF first came out. Delays, over budget, not certified to lift off when it's hot or cold, not allowed to carry its gun, etc. But I'm really amazed and happy how this machine has shaped up over the years, overcoming all those growing pains and meeting or exceeding expectations.
It will be at least two decades until FCAS will see deployment, but I'm hopeful that the ongoing upgrades and refits like the new electronic warfare kit will keep the Eurofighter up to date to meet any upcoming challenges Europe might face.
So basically what happens when any new jet is introduced?
@@razorburn645 Pretty much; I do remember similar controversies about the F-35 though that project was of course much more expensive.
I don't think it has always been this way, but as military hardware becomes ever more advanced and expensive, this is probably the new normal?
General Jumper said on the frequent comparisons, it and the F22 were like comparing F1 and NASCAR, they’re both designed to do two different things.
The interesting thing about supersonic flight without afterburners was first developed by the British for the EE Lightning in the early 1950s. It was then deployed in the late and lamented TSR-2 and of course Concorde still the ONLY aircraft to fly across the Atlantic at Mach 2 without afterburners. All before the Americans thought they had invented it on the F-22 and gave it the name 'Supercruise'.
*Forehead / Palm interface*
The British and Spanish typhoon demo teams were in Portugal this July for an airshow, I can confirm, they make our f-16s seem quiet in comparison.
I worked the TA ramp at Al Udeid AB in the middle east 15-ish years ago. The RAF stopped by with a squadron of Typhoons and I was stoked. Totally fanboyed out on their jets. The RAF was great and I helped them all I could. What an amazing aircraft and the RAF were fine young lads. Made friends, good times. Love from the USAF.
I was the AGE (aerospace ground equipment) guy, ground support, driver on the flightline, covering TA, (Falcon Dispatch) incase anyone is curious. ;)
The Tempest Project, would be an intresting video its intended to be the UKs 6th Generation fighter and a replacement for the Typhoon
It’s not really a replacement more something to work with to euro as it will perform more like the f35
I can confirm that the typhoon is incredibly loud, I work along side bae Warton and when they are taking off all phone calls have to be paused as there is no way for you to hear what the other person is saying and all's they can here is a loud thunder while our building shakes. Or when leaving work on a hot day with the roof down in the car you cross the flight path and will be only a few meters under them as they fly over, sometimes going full throttle at that point to do a go around.
They always seem to be around when it’s a day I want a lie in.
I like how Eurofighter hasnt been updated in the last decade.
@4:05 fairly sure that it’s the centre of lift that shifts and not the centre of gravity
Now we need a Video with SAAB JAS 39 Gripen
Great vid as always! 😁
One small thing Leuchars is pronouced Lookers 😁
And it's "KONN-INGS-BEE" as well.
not to mention leuchars was passed off to the army years ago... now lossiemouth handles qra for scotland
Lookers? No it's not, it's a ch from the back of the throat. English folk have difficulty with that.
its hard to lock on eurofighter, with eqvipted with meteor it can make bad day for newer generation planes
I mean, the division of fighter jets into 'generations' was invented by the marketing department of Lockheed Martin; it's not too surprising that it doesn't accurately reflect the balance of different multirole fighters, and the Typhoon (and Rafale, for that matter) are far more than just European F-16 equivalents, which their categorisation as 'fourth generation' fighters would have you believe.
@@rjfaber1991
Which is why Eurofighters are usually referred to as "4.5 gen." It really does come down to stealth, which is why the Eurofighter can't be on the same level as the F-22 or F-35.
This is the episode I’ve been waiting for, when I was a kid it was known as Eurofighter 2000. My dad actually worked on the team designing the wings (why he had to move to Spain when I was 6 weeks old).
EF2000 still gets used, in Germany at least but maybe others.
Yeah....well, my dad is batman
@@nexpro6118 why do you think this is so unbelievable? Thousands of people worked on the development of that plane over decades. There will be a lot of dads who worked on that thing all over Europe.
The story about the engineer who forgot his air defenders felt like filler to me. It would have been nice to hear more about the development of the aircraft.
I currently reside in Lossiemouth and I get to see these epic aircraft on a near daily basis and yes they are loud that is not an understatement
I was just thinking that it's not Leuchars that has the qra any more, but Lossie!
Could you do an episode on the fighter jet Jas 39 Gripen
Saw a prototype of the Eurofighter fly at Farnborough Air Show back in the early 90's (it was white, with 'EF2000" written on the tail)
Absolutely incredible machine!
In fact the definitive prototype rather than production prototypes was the British Aerospace EAP which also flew at the Farnborough Air Show in 1986. It was a public / private venture by BAE to prove the concept.
@@1chish
Had to Google that. I must say it looks incredibly close to what I saw at Farnborough; minus 'EF2000' written on the tail. I'm wondering if that's the one I saw?
Either way. Incredible aircraft.
I really enjoy Megaprojects, Yet I am becoming more annoyed when place names are not said correctly. Other than this, keep up the good work!
Yeah I'm sorry but I cant't even guess at the name of the place the first Eurofighter took off. It's Manching, Bavaria. Not sure why Simon said Mancheching or something similar.
Lu cars and con Ings be. I agree. Leuchars is easy to mipronouce but why cone is added to conningsby l have no idea. As a 12 year old I was driven to Leuchars by my mum in the Fiat 600 multiple. The gearbox failed. We stopped and bought Lucasaide in the hope it might help us get there. It didn't. Why did anyone drink that muck?
Just back from Airpower 2022, the Typhoon is the jewel of the crown in that show.
Heard them blasting overhead a few times when the QRA crew from neuburg in Bavaria was sent up. One time they flew directly over the part of the city where I was at the time, you should've seen the panic on people's faces when the boom hit hahahaha never got to actually see them tho, sadly. Did see two tornados fly over my house tho, flying so low that I could make out every little detail. Training flight, my guess would be IADS penetration, as those guys got the job of delivering nukes when the time comes. That made my little aviation nerd brain very very happy. Also saw a Chinook fly over the house once. Those things are fucking massive.
I live really close to RAF Lossiemouth, these jets are really cool to see up close. Sometimes they take off and instantly go vertical, noisy is an understatement
Do they still take off over Duffus Castle? Remember watching Tornados fly from there years ago doing touch and go training. It used to be a popular spot for plane spotters.
I'm loving these modern fighter jet videos!
Modern? This thing was developed in late 80s and came out in the '90s and 97 I don't know if I'd call that modern
The intimidation factor of a loud show of force flyby maneuver can be effective. No ordnance payload, fire mission or airspace treaty violations required.
I'm not even taking the P$ss
But I genuinely would like a mega(or side) projects on Simons YT channels.
After starting with mega projects and watching everything from Geographics to into the shadows.
I'd like to hear about how it all started and the writers/team behind all the channels 😁😆
But they are in the basement and had no internet access
Wouldn't this break the first casual criminalist rule though - never write your crimes down?
Saw one flying today. Not usually that arsed about planes but the sheer power of the noise it makes gets me every time
Last time i was this early, Simon didn't have a beard lol
At 10:36... The QRA teams are actually based at RAF Lossiemouth for Northern and RAF Coningsby for Sothern.
I did an internship at MTU once and they just happened to run a test with these engines and theyre so loud. I could feel the engine running, its incredible.
You are somewhat overselling the multirole capability of the EF2000. The Eurofighter was originally a pure fighter. Air-to-ground capabilities were added later. This still makes it suboptimal in the A2G role. The targeting pod can only by fitted on the central hardpoint. This is one of the 3 wet points for droptanks. So the EF can only carry 2 droptanks and a pod. Secondly, the landing gear folds into the wing behind the inner wing hardpoints. As a result long weapons like cruise missiles and anti-shipmissiles can't be carried on these stations. They have to be fitted to either the central hardpoint or the 2 wet hardpoints on the wing. Again, this means that you can't carry 3 droptanks plus large missiles. The French Rafale on the other hand was intended as an omnirole aircraft from the start and it shows. It has 5 wet points. It has a special hardpoint to attach the targeting pod. This all means that the Rafale CAN carry 3 droptanks plus a pod and bombs or 3 tanks and AShM or cruise ALCM. The EF2000 is likely a bit better in the A2A role than the Rafale but the Rafale is a better A2G platform.
You are right, but you judge a platform also by its ECM suite and radar. Tranche 4 will be a turning point for the Typhoon. Mark my words :)
This is awesome I’ve just been watching the typhoon today at Bournemouth air festival
In 2007 Richard Hammond raced a Euro fighter Typhoon against a Bugatti Veyron
Possibly 1 of THE BEST drag races ever created!
👏👏👏👏
Apparently it was his first race after a bad crash.
@@dongiovanni4331 What a way to start off then!
Long time ago, I can't remember that well so I'm going with your feedback
2007.
@@moonbaby6134 Eh wasn't far off
Year is hardly a mistake worth noting
Nonetheless, my original comment is corrected buddy 👌
@@maplesyrup7959 it was immense. Only reason i corrected was I was there chap.
The right pilot flying these jets, taking out all the jets, typhoon thrusts creating 1000mph thrusts flying everyone out of the water lol hahahaha blown away with unimaginable thrust.
The most powerful and second fastest fighter today 💪🏻😎🔝 only the F-15 is slightly faster
@@fra93ilgrandeGet lost yank.
I have to say I favor the Typhoon over the Rafale on the basis that the former looks more like a fighter and the latter looks like a mutant.
There's a saying that if it looks right it flies right.
Though to be fair, Raptor had / has a lot in its favour, one of the main reasons being that it was completed. For a long time, the French could offer Rafale into the market place, complete with all manner of munitions for all manner of roles, land and carrier based variants. It was a finished product, ready to go, available on short timescales.
Whereas Typhoon had a finished airframe but they hadn't finished all the weapon systems development and integration. It was not the finished article that the Rafale was. Sometimes, part of "finishing" Typhoon meant hoping for a wealthy nation like Saudi Arabia to place an order, to fund it.
So that was the difference; the French were far more dedicated to funding their own programme than the Eurofighter consortium partners were. That's the problem with multi-nation developments; it's very difficult to get all the funding governments to actually fund it, especially if some of them get lax because they don't share the same military ambitions as the others.
Look at Germany vs the UK, in the Typhoon consortium. Following the collapse of the USSR, they generally settled down to spending less and less on defence, and had no ambitions for ops abroad, so they saw no need to hurry anything. Whereas the UK has had a different attitude to ops abroad, and more need of the finished aircraft. Of course, what Germany has now found out is that decades of taking it easy on defence suddenly looks like a bad idea when Russia comes close to taking over the country nextdoor-but-one....
That man in the letter spoke honestly and well. Respect 🐬👍
I don't think the center of gravity shifts anywhere, I think you've made a mistake 😅
It's the center of lift, not the center of gravity which shifts. He probably confused this.
This is usual for supersonic aircraft
yeah, I think it's the center of aerodynamic pressure that shifts back at supersonic speeds
Helo Simon thank you for another excellent video. It is a pleasure to watch a TH-cam video presented by a man who has clearly done his research, knows his technology and presents in clear and eloquent manner. Keep up the great work, we need more people like you on TH-cam. Best regards from Western Australia, Clare
Would be cool to see a video on the SAAB JAS 39 Gripen :)
Fully agree. Living just a couple km's from the Norrbotten Wing (F21) of the Swedish air force, I hear these every day.
I used to life near a Euro Fighter test center. You don't need to go outside to know what it is. Quiet it is not.
This is truly a beautiful machine. It’s getting even better. With the new Captor E AESA radar and more advanced systems, this fighter just got sharper teeth
Worked in the Typhoon Propulsion Servicing Facility (Engine Bay) at RAF Coningsby for 4 years in the E.F.D.C. department. Engines were tough old birds apart from the Italian parts of the reheat system, that were prone to cracking and failing until modded, but easy ish to replace.
Ah, but I bet the italian parts looked the part
Con-ings-bee not CONE
And Leuchars. Luke-ars.
That's the beauty 😍 of this jet fiegther keep on upgrading.
$100,000/hour may seem like a bargain if someone did the same analysis for other fighters.
£100000 so that is Around $116000 a hour, I assume its USD you use. I'm fairly certain the 100000 is wrong more like £11000 = $12700 or €12500 euro.
Bruh no thats more than the f35
$100,000 an hour is bull, no jet in the world comes close to that prize for flying per hour, maybe $27,000 or $30,000? but not $100,000 no way! someone added a lot of extra coasts to get $100,000 per hour.
I remember a eurofighter scramble to Bristol for a (false) helicopter distress signal - the boom was audible and shook my front door in Coventry 🤣
Hoping you'll do the hornet soon.
As far as that advertisement goes... drinking, maybe... swallowing it? We did not see that. Stealth vitamins.
The BAE EAP was the starting point of this program!
RAF Leuchars is shut for good it was between Lossiemouth or Leuchars and Lossiemouth won as the locals were complaining that the base is the only thing that keeps tourists coming. No Typhoons were at Leuchars ever only Tornado F3’s.
Such a stunning jet! I wonder what they are like against the 5th gens? Or even the older 4th gens? 🤙🏽🇺🇸
they can hold their own against the Raptor in a within visual range engagement. BVR is a different story though.
@@hondansx1000 though these days, "visual range" is a very long way, thanks to the optical targeting systems used. A pilot's Mk 1 eyeball is a very redundant feature!
Nobody really knows. I would have thought Europe and the US are very much equal. They always have been and that won't have changed now.
Typhoons make great targets for 5th Gen fighters. They light up nicely when hit at BVR ranges.
@lxRaptorxl Have 5th gen aircraft magically become optically invisible? Last time I saw one, I couldn't see straight through it...
You have to separate out airframe from weapon system; you could put the weapon system from, say, a Typhoon or F35 (both having both radar and optical targeting) onto a Hercules and it would be able to shoot down an aircraft with a lesser weapons system.
Watching this video it made me think you should make a video on SideProjects about the fastest Jets.
Intresting that Simon put out a Video about the Eurofighter Typhoon on the same day as the Airpower 2022 was here in Austria the largest Air Show here in Europe.
Awesome
I was about to comment about that. Especially since he used footage from a previous Airpower
The lead engine developer was Rolls Royce. The other companies were for ancillary systems such as gearbox, fmu's, pumps etc.
Saying the gun, or any gun on a modern fighter for that matter, is for «close in fights» is just not a reality anymore. More than anything the cannon on a modern fighter is for strafing ground targets.
Saw the eurofighter at a show yesterday!
The centre of gravity remains the same in super sonic flight, if we could affect this we'd have Alcubierre drives.
It moves the centre of lift.
A lot of supersonic aircraft, including Concorde and Typhoon, pump fuel around to keep the centre of gravity (synonymous with centre of mass) in the right place wrt to the centre of pressure...
100.000 per hour? This is mad, as I recall Gripen was estimated at approx. 1/10th of this cost.
In Germany and Austria, Eurofighter pilots wear Libelle flight suits, which are hydraulic instead of pneumatic and allow for even more extreme G forces. Also, Pirate can network with IRIS missiles, enhancing the planes overall detection and targeting capabilities. IRIS is an impressive piece of hardware and probably worth its own video, the politics behind its development are also quite interesting. As soon as the aircraft powers up, the missiles' sensor heads constantly scan the environment, visibly tracking any heat source they can find. Which is probably you if you're the strongest heat source in the vicinity. Having those things follow you around as you walk in front of the plane is kinda unnerving...
The video STARTS at 01:40
I’m gonna like and reply so other people can see this
Only jet that gives the f22 a run for its money in a 1v1 knifefight, some people say that rafale can also but its simply not true and has been proven, the rafale can survive by jamming and running away but thats it. Its an good dogfighter but its not as good as the EF or the F22.
th-cam.com/video/oGuWadoTgkE/w-d-xo.html
Well that is wrong, if you look it up, the rafale has faced the eurofighter in friendly aerial combat, and it has won most of it ( 2 rafale vs 4 ef : a win for the rafale ) . Furthermore, on a video you can find on youtube you can see a rafale "shooting down" a f22 in a dogfight.
But there are all very capable airplane ;-)
That’s one hell of a machine.
Jeremy Clarkson was amazed that the voice activation can work for Welsh & Scottish people.
This channel is slowly becoming Simon's aviation section.
Center of úressure moves back during transsonic speed, not center of gravity.
Dude if there's one thing I despise in life it's ads and sponsors and I absolutely despise them...
This will souond weird but I like listening to your videos to go to sleep to. I still rewatch what i miss.
Still the best plane around, according to the U.S air force, and that is saying something. This is a beast of a plane, seen the plane close up and what a fecking beast it is, and the ground shakes on take off.
I was about halfway through this video when two jets flew over. Looked it up...Eurofighter typhoons 😂
I just want to say i fell asleep with my headphones on and woke up to simon saying 3some which isn't something im sure i've heard him say before, but thanks simon!
The CENTER OF LIFT shifts aft, not the center of gravity.
One item that is not clear (at least to me) about the hot refueling. What makes it a hot refuel is that the engine is NOT TURNED OFF.
Fall out of the sky like a rock if the engine was turned off
Best looking jet out there
I love when Megaprojects talks about Fighter Jets ❤
It's Leu-cars, the H is silent. Typhoons haven't been based there since 2015 when the Army took over.
It's great to learn about this amazing aircraft. Thank You
I didn't hear the sponsor at first and I thought to myself, "wait I thought this was about airplanes"
I'm never usually patriotic I have many reasons to not love the UK, I am especially proud of it's aerospace industry and it's place in conception, design and production of the Eurofighter. I love that it's aerodynamically unstable to be superior in dogfights.
Capabilities aside, the Euro fighter is pretty much the coolest looking fighter jet ever made, followed by the F16, than the F35 respectively.
Awesome plane. But I'm glad we went with the F35 for Canada
UK has F35s too. Wouldn’t the Typhoon be more for the roles of your F18s if comparing?
It is two different roles. Canada does not border any threats where a high agility fast interceptor is required. A hell of alot of low iq people in the comment section have now clue what they are talking about. The environment they are to be deployed in is extremely important in debates like this. Eurofighter is an absolute beast when it is deployed for what it was meant for. Pair it with gripen,f16, f18, f35, f22 rafaels in the space over Europe and you got a very, very nasty wall you have to penetrate.
the 'Jäger 90' is finally done... read about it in Peter Mosleitners magazine as a kid.... I am in my mid forties now.
Quiet, yeah right! I live a few miles away from RAF Coningsby and when those things are flying over You can't hear yourself think, they can be heard up to 20 miles away in my experience. Great aeroplane though.