Adaptation or evolution? I think adaptation is more likely, and it shows the superiority of a design, to change and adapt to new conditions. Evolution requires chemical changes, and is not mathematically and statistically possible considering all the variables that would have to be in place at just the right time, in the right location, and at the right temperature/climate to support, and then protect the changes.
![ร้อยพ่อพันแม่ - WanMai [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/XY2pNYASEbg/mqdefault.jpg)
I will be forever grateful of the people who advance human knowledge, and hope to one day become one of them
Incrível! Parabéns a todos os pesquisadores envolvidos, mas principalmente os brasileiros! 👏🏼👏🏼
Fascinating thank you!
Can you please correct the automatically generated closed caption so the hearing impaired can view your video?
Amazing research, loved the 3-D reconstruction.
They know it was an early bird because it was fossilized with a worm in its mouth.
You explained it so well, thanks 😊
Beautiful✨ birds
Interesting 👍
Love this.
Not sure Rosetta Stone is quite the right analogy, but very good work
But it did get me to click
❤
Busy teacher 06
How do you know that the single fossil doesn't have abnormal or atypical features?
We don't, but on the balance of probabilities, it's much more likely a fossil represents a typical feature than an atypical feature.
Isn't 'bird brain' evolution an oxymoron ?
Adaptation or evolution? I think adaptation is more likely, and it shows the superiority of a design, to change and adapt to new conditions. Evolution requires chemical changes, and is not mathematically and statistically possible considering all the variables that would have to be in place at just the right time, in the right location, and at the right temperature/climate to support, and then protect the changes.
Evolution of course!