‼️ How to use the Deeper CHIRP + beam angles to find big fish? ★★★★★

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 31 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 32

  • @450kman
    @450kman 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the informative video. You saved me $300 as I was sold on purchasing a Deeper until the part about it defaulting (8:58) into shallow water mode, narrow 7*beam, for depths less than 6feet. Depths

  • @BivvyLife
    @BivvyLife ปีที่แล้ว

    A superb detailed insight into the workings of these brilliant little devices. Thank you sir.

  • @DonBrydon
    @DonBrydon 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This was very helpful, thank you.

  • @sergeyo2264
    @sergeyo2264 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice! Still no way to know if it's left or right (f/b) side from the center...

    • @the-fishfinders1967
      @the-fishfinders1967  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yes, but if can see that if you turn the deeper a little to left or right.

    • @sergeyo2264
      @sergeyo2264 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ha-ha! yes! so obvious! why would this not occur to me ;-)

  • @griffithandy2950
    @griffithandy2950 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Voiceovers are video killers. I’d rather listen to your accent while you explain.

  • @SeekerofWisdom1949
    @SeekerofWisdom1949 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    My is new deeper device showing 27 ft deep when in a pool 3 to 4 feet deep?

    • @the-fishfinders1967
      @the-fishfinders1967  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      if it is that shallow, the Deeper cannot show a correct depth. The path of the ping is too short ... From 2 m or 7 ft you have a good depth indication.
      At 3-4 ft the Deeper also makes no sense, because the transmission cone is much too narrow to indicate fish. Tight lines Martin

  • @expomm
    @expomm 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Glad this is in english

  • @jamesdean645
    @jamesdean645 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    so i cant catch in a 2 meter deep water cause its too shallow for deeper to work properly

    • @the-fishfinders1967
      @the-fishfinders1967  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      right, The Deeper does not give a good result in too shallow shallow water (2 m / 6 ft), because then automatically the narrow beam is used.

    • @kaseybuchanan3269
      @kaseybuchanan3269 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@the-fishfinders1967 what about 10-20 feet? Is this a product that is only meant for lake trout at 40 ft depth or something? I don’t understand why it would default to narrow under 15 ft depth.

    • @paxmowa
      @paxmowa 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@the-fishfinders1967 But you can disable automatic frequency adjustment for shallow water in the Deeper app.

  • @sjoer
    @sjoer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think Zander sounds a lot better than Pikeperch!

  • @cerebraltackle
    @cerebraltackle 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    But the math doesn't add up for the entire diameter of the cone at the bottom.

    • @the-fishfinders1967
      @the-fishfinders1967  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are right. The transmission cone is also not so static, and simply stops at a diameter of 8 m, for example. It is concentrated to the center and downward and weakens outward. The meters and feet are meant to give an impression of how the cone is constructed and how it works.

    • @cerebraltackle
      @cerebraltackle 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@the-fishfinders1967 We worked with Deeper's team on this here recently. The math was corrected and they're thinking about adding the information in-app.

    • @NIKOinIRL
      @NIKOinIRL ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@cerebraltackle would love to see the search area displayed in the app

    • @cerebraltackle
      @cerebraltackle ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@NIKOinIRL if I can find the graph we put together, I'll get it to you. We've already given it to the folks at deeper.

    • @ultraSabotaj
      @ultraSabotaj ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cerebraltackle Can I have it too? Thx.

  • @davidlabossiere1905
    @davidlabossiere1905 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    your accent was fine, but i prefer human accents to robots

    • @the-fishfinders1967
      @the-fishfinders1967  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, we understand ... if we can hire and pay a professional voice over artist we will do that later. 😎

  • @thelukos
    @thelukos 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The plural of fish is fish

  • @RajSarchimelia
    @RajSarchimelia ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i"m tired of your weird "feet". stop using such units.

  • @RonBarrett1954
    @RonBarrett1954 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The plural of "fish" is "fish". There's no such word as "fishes". At least review your video headline before posting.

    • @owczarb
      @owczarb 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Hi, there is something called multiple plural and "fishes" is correct as it describes multiple groups of fish.

    • @dannymaiorani519
      @dannymaiorani519 ปีที่แล้ว

      Incorrect. If there are 2 carp, 3 bass, and 4 salmon then there are three fishes. I lived in Germany for 3 years, they learn English from a young age, many of them speak it better than your average American can.

    • @kolumbus1984
      @kolumbus1984 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why do you even have to be arrogant !?! Hello there are so many countries other than Great nation off america ! Did you know that average European know about 5 languages, why do you think that English is so superior that everyone have to know it perfect! From many languages, making direct translation many times sentence does not make sense, but people try, and i think he has done a good job. And be appreciative that he does that, so many can enjoy. I dont even care grammar, i totally understood what he ment, and many will agree that he has done more than a good job.