OAK-D Pro tests and overview

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 15

  • @rafaelspring190
    @rafaelspring190 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Anton, I enjoy watching your videos on depth cameras. Great work.

  • @RoiZiss
    @RoiZiss 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Dear Anton, I very much enjoy watching your videos and insights of these camera.
    Roi Ziss (Realsense chief architect)

    • @AntonMaltsev
      @AntonMaltsev  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you very much, Roi!
      It's very motivating!

    • @RoiZiss
      @RoiZiss 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@AntonMaltsev let me know if you are interested being a BETA tester for our next gen cameras that will be launched next year;) (they will blow you away)

    • @AntonMaltsev
      @AntonMaltsev  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@RoiZiss Wow! This will be great!:)
      What do I need to do?
      You can reach me anytime through email ( anton@rembrain.ai ) or telegram ( @wk_zb ) or LinkedIn (I sent you an invite)

    • @RoiZiss
      @RoiZiss 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@picnet we actually had such a product in very mature stages. although it had relatively short range at outdoor, it was FAR better than L515 in all other conditions. unfortunately, as you all know - most of our LIDAR team moved to Mobileye in order to focus on the automotive LIDAR (leaving all development focus to the next generation of stereo technology)

  • @zechenwei1139
    @zechenwei1139 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi! Thank you for the informative video! So if I mainly want to use this camera outdoors, does the laser dot projector help? Or should I just go with the regular Oak-d? Thank you!

    • @AntonMaltsev
      @AntonMaltsev  ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi!
      Depending on the weather condition and day or night usage. If your preferred case is sunny conditions then your OAK-D will be OK.

    • @zechenwei1139
      @zechenwei1139 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AntonMaltsev Makes sense, thank you!

  • @GPT4_8
    @GPT4_8 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great Job Anton!!!
    Do you think I am better off using Zed 2i for the longer range than using OAK-D?

    • @AntonMaltsev
      @AntonMaltsev  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi! Thank you!
      The more the distance between the cameras - the better for long distances. So yes, Zed2i will be more accurate.

  • @AntonMaltsev
    @AntonMaltsev  2 ปีที่แล้ว

    And Luxionis made their own testing of accuracy for OAK-D, and it's the same for OAK-D pro on the long-distance. Here it is - docs.google.com/document/d/1F4Y6S6KtZ4f8RBE4W-o9x6xVXbqsw8UIGWPkML-on1Y/edit
    Look pretty close for my tests in the video.

  • @artemkhateev3650
    @artemkhateev3650 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Интересные тесты, спасибо. Возникает вопрос - насколько реально использовать такое оборудование для беспилотного автомобиля? Не будет ли слишком много шума и неточностей в распознавании?

    • @AntonMaltsev
      @AntonMaltsev  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Для авто я бы советовал все же лидары использовать. Либо стереокамеры с хорошим алгоритмом. На активную подсветку в уличных условиях надеяться особо не приходится.

    • @artemkhateev3650
      @artemkhateev3650 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AntonMaltsev Спасибо!