Physicist Steven Weinberg, who won a Nobel prize for his theoretical contributions to the Standard Model of particle physics, has died. He was 88. Closer To Truth was fortunate enough to have had many inspiring conversations with Steven over the years. He will be greatly missed.
Of course, you two are great people, but just looking at the calm tone, brown-based clothes and the room are like art. Thank you very much. (Edit) *Steven Weinberg died today... R.I.P.*
A pleasure to hear such a great luminary in physics..I still have his early book, "The first 3 minutes" and it was paradigm shifting for me. Sadly Steven is correct in that string theory like an abandoned building is slowly falling down. There's an illustration here of the integrity and STRENGTH of science, the fundamental importance that ONLY the evidence matters, not biased attachments to any particular idea . Amazing interview, thanks..
Coulombs Law and the correction of two fundamental errors in physics are all you need to produce a viable universal structure that leads to a TOE capable of describing the universe at all scales. When populated with CODATA published values, this methodology leads to a balanced atomic model that resolves perfectly to 41 decimal places and puts the physical back into physics.
Is string theory a possible part of solution to big bang start of universe or black holes? How would string theory apply to black holes and big bang start of universe?
"There is no matter as such. All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the "particle" of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force is the existence of a conscious and intelligent Mind. This Mind is the MATRIX of all matter." - Max Planck, Father of Quantum Physics "I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness." … … … "Anyone who becomes seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that there is a spirit manifest in the laws of the universe, a spirit vastly superior to that of man." - most famous physicist and philosopher Albert Einstein … … … "If quantum mechanics hasn’t profoundly shocked you, you haven’t understood it yet. Everything we call real is made of things that cannot be regarded as real.” - Niels Bohr, a Danish Physicist … … … "This most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being." - Sir Isaac Newton This most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent being. And if the fixed Stars are the centers of other like systems, these, being formed by the like wise counsel, must all be subject to the dominion of One. [...] This Being Governs all things, not as the soul of the world, but as Lord over all: And on account of his dominion he is wont to be called Lord God παντοκρατωρ, or Universal Ruler. ~ from General Scholium written by Sir Isaac Newton
Taking quotes from smart people out of their context is not a very smart idea. Now you know less than before, when you didn't even start thinking about these questions. Atoms are plasma like, but particles doesn't revolve around nucleus, nothing resembles solar system since we don't have quantum gravity theory.
@Ali Talei Many thanks for the reply to my post. In that case it means we will remain frustrated in our attempts to explain eveything (G.U.T.), until science is able to understand the function of dark energy.
A unified theory is not possible because at the heart of the problem is the dual arrow of time. QM works in Backward time and the Macro world in Forward time. Big Bang needs modification for Backward Time and then you get Dark Matter out of it.(Antimatter surviving Big Bang due to alternate quantum phase) Matter and antimatter ( surviving on large scale) are the source of Dark Energy. The two repel each other on the large scale, before they have a chance to mutually annihilate.
The out-of-focus start is less cool than you may think it is. Fade in from black, just after speakers have started speaking is, I think, more effective and comfortable.
I think it's more from a conceptual POV that they're going to make something that's typically hard to understand (blurry) and make it clearer. From a purely aesthetic POV a fade in from black might look better though.
String theory is just a general field of mathematical speculations, other gifts to humanity from same kind of people are big bang, inflation, black holes, gravity waves, Higgs boson,... every idea that can't be directly observed or verified by any experimental means. This is not science, it's ideology, based on convincing hypothetical models meant to bring scientific understanding closer to primitive cultures, by trying to explain how divine miracles and magic might be possible to understand in a new global mental framework.
I'm glad he passed the pawn shop to Rick and Cory and got into a more serious endeavor. EDIT: Sad to hear of his death. My light-hearted joke was just that. RIP, Steven Weinberg. 💕
At the end Weinberg says: unfortunately, string theory is the only direction that we know. What about QFT? I always thought QFT was also very promising.
QFT doesn't incorporate gravity. Sure, there is a versions of QFT in curved spacetime, but spacetime in QFT is always a fixed background. Steven Weinberg wrote 3 volume book named Quantum Theory of Fields. It's very complex reading. First volume with subtitle "Foundations" has 609 pages and you already need to have excellent foundation in advanced quantum mechanics and deep knowledge of mathematical and theoretical physics to be able to read it with understanding.
String Theory is indeed considered a QFT, there are many theoretical frameworks let’s call them that qualify, or meet all the requirements, for membership into group classification as a genuine QFT. You will see many skeptics and idiots these days who, with no formal training or education, simply go against string theory but mostly do so just to be different, to look smart and edgy. The fact is, they don’t understand the enterprise, or the game of theoretical physics. They can use fancy words all they want like unfalsifiability, or say that science is evidence based etc. well no shit of course it is, but that doesn’t stop THEORETICAL researchers from introducing new types of objects with various properties, throw them into toy model universes and see what happens to its logical end, that with various abstract objects equipped with certain properties and parameters which govern or restrict their behaviors, the rich structures that may naturally emerge can be studied as much as they desire. It so happens that with strings, a rich enough structure emerged that at least seemed to be able to fit gravity into a quantum mechanical framework seemingly naturally, and therefore it would be quite obvious as to why they would want to continue researching these objects, and to believe in its potential in that at the very least they may have been on some sort of right tracking of thinking. The parrots of course will say “but you can’t probe strings!” oh so since our technology is not yet able to resolve any of these objects it therefore means it’s not real science, because it cannot be tested experimentally? There is a distinction between things that cannot be tested experimentally due perhaps to insufficient technologies or as yet undiscovered strategies and ideas, and those which cannot even in PRINCIPLE be tested experimentally. A proposal for a theory which could never possibly be tested experimentally, not even indirectly, well something like that could very well be argued as a dead end. However, entire frameworks which have been constructed by talented experts within the field, which are not in principle untestable, and at the outset at a minimum seem to be not only good candidates but also steps in the right direction of thought itself in seeking answers to some problem, in this case the problem of quantum gravity, yeah there’s no way something like that could just be put aside and not explored.
We know how all physical laws work that created the universe and everything in it, but we don't know the axioms that created the fundamental laws themselves.
Sir i m invent tree sensorable Ai algorithm or tree sensor computer system and power acceptor large machine. This power acceptor help update new type quantum computer India India
It is sad to see him passing 😢 but,indeed, general relativity and especially relativity of Einstein would totally agree that he, although, is not with us but surely he is ALL AROUND US IN A REALLY PHYSICAL MEANING OUT THERE IN SPACE- TIME. He was very elegant and concise in the way he explained difficult ideas. Thank you closer to truth. You are doing an excellent job 👏.
I love how materialists accuse the other side of anthropocentrism, while they maintain only humans are conscious. And while stating explicitly that things like atoms do not have consciousness, refer to genes as “selfish.”
Sleep with feet elevated 6 inchs one end, sleep with feet at raised end,free energy awaits ,costs nothing ,meet your soul energy =microbes ,light,dark energy ,meet your dark energy!!!!!!
"God" has become to personalized, thus greatly subjective. Many today, when they speak of "God", are really meaning "ego". God isn't what you think God is. God's religion isn't what you think God's religion is. God's book isn't what you believe his book to be. God's ideology isn't what your ideology is. Your ego is not God. God is not ego. God is not like us, however part of us is like God. Souce, or Light is a better reference for God. Source: We're talking about the very ineffable fabric of the universe, the life force that gives sustenance to ALL. The very form of all things, balances, motion. The soul that moves the mover. The laws of nature, force, elements, qualities. The creation, manifestation, generation, transformation. Intellect, conscioussness, thought, imagination, reason. Being. Living. Experiencing. Implementing. Creating.
Interesting thesis, I really enjoyed watching this. Big fan of Astronomy and Astrology, the Astrological Age Cycle and Solstices are caused by the KT Boundary.
The Tao ,God's Providence, the Order of Nature and time so Tao had No fundamental reason to chose otherwise and you would have to know all darkness to Be capable of 10 to the 500 more choices than participating particles of time and space so I like Carl Sagan thoughts on the Hindu universe
@@Robinson8491 Confused, if not inapplicable. You must be the only person here that doesn’t understand, “I think therefore I am.” That I exist is in fact the only thing I can prove.
@@lr2357 yes Descartes ruminations are the pinnacle of metaphysical reasoning. This was the time before Newton etc. I think you could say there has been some advancements in the counter reasoning. I always dislike people who say 'you can't prove it'. They remind me of the high school bullies who had no real arguments except that comment. And felt they were winning because of it. Empty retoric. Let's say I don't look at the moon. I ask you 'do you see the moon'? You say yes. I trust you, therefore I accept the moon exists without me looking at it. If you want to argue with this, you need to argue the definition of 'existing' and 'proving'. For instance, does it need to be expressed mathematically? Good luck with untangling this rhetorical jungle. Also many philosophers claim the 'I' that Descartes refers to is an illusion, as well as identity, so the I claiming to do the thinking would be an illusion. Can you prove this is not the case? Therefore Descartes conclusion is also dubious. Etcetera etcetera infinite regress Also you say you can prove you exist because you think. I don't trust your authority as an individual, as I cannot prove you exist (because like you said, it is impossible for me to prove the world exists). So your proof is only a private one for yourself; useless to me. So what is the value of your private proof to me? You could be a philosophical zombie just making statements. So for me it is impossible to prove you exist just like I can't prove the world exists. I exist according to me. But I or me could be an illusion. Pfff there is a reason why nobody likes to argue metaphysical bullies. Because in the end you get stuck in a loop I can go on for ever on this slippery slope of empty statements in reply to yours that started it
@@Robinson8491 Right. I am one of the things in the world that you can’t prove exists, Descartes or no Descartes. I have no idea what bullies saying “you can’t prove it,” would even be referring to. Having said that, I didn’t get bullied because I’m not one of the dorks.. the very dorks that turn people off of science, as nobody in their right mind would want to be associated with the kinds of kids that tend to be into science. And this is kind of my point, (speaking from the gut) people like Dawkins and Krauss are going to tell me about human consciousness when they don’t understand being human well enough to tell a joke, bust a move, talk to girls, or dress themselves. No wonder they think the universe is rigid and not self-aware-they aren’t even self aware, and they project this onto the world at large. In fact i suspect that it is this very “nerdiness” that prevents many scientists from progressing. They’ve taken us far, but lack the imagination and creativity to comprehend the very abstract, new scientific territory we’ve entered into. And this sentiment has been echoed by Frank Wilczek in the introduction of “A Beautiful Question.”
You brains can find destination, I don’t know why, we should use the difficult words, likes Meta 4 , and string, and etc .. I can explain the theory of creation by biological language ! But not now
Yes, that was just speculation. If you are interested to know the final theory, you can find it in the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"
Are the intellectuals steering our world in a good direction these days? I say not. So, to give them credence over an intuitive and common sense view is not high on my list. Intellectuals should be considered, obviously, but they simply do not deserve unquestioned oracle status.
What is Everything? Everything is the universe(all things exist) excluded The God because He is not a thing. Where is the universe? The universe is information/knowledge in one conscious mind space thus it is the inverted/reciprocal of the real universal physical space.
Probably is exactly like that. They pretending that the final Theory does not exist! - Wrong! - Just type in Amazon books the book title - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" and You will find out the truth!
Off the top of my head I would say that the string in the universe is human intention. If the flow of gravity can go in One Direction, but man can counteract that flow and go in the opposite direction, then the argument can be made that the universe revolves around man’s intention
@@matusfrisik3887it's very embarrassing to think someone out there is so delusional as to think they can improve sting theory off the top of their head
String theory is obviously false by virtue of the fact that it involves strings of differing lengths. This was so obvious from the outset it wasn't funny. So the problem with these theorists, is that they're not good at logic and philosophy. If your fundamental entity has different forms or lengths, then it can't be the fundamental entity. Duh!!!!!
And theists and atheists are equally annoying with their lying claims of "I know God does [or not] exist." The fact is no one knows, and a real scientist will tell you they are agnostic.
It is not an illusion but is a reality. The complete geometrical diagram of the Universe you can print on your tee shirt. The theory exists - Just find the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" The diagram is there!
Steve theory everything, string is incostence reality Universe . Steve problems is thinking his solution like Einstein God opens door mystetuos to them. Viu mistakes snob guys.
Just write what you think in your native language, if you can't improvise global English, so people can use automated translators if they're interested in your opinion.
@@CeezGeez I dont have enough faith to believe in the unguided developement of life from non living matter to a single cell capable of reproducing itself all the way to human its a real stretch of the imagination people seem willing to believe without knowledge and understanding let alone proof its just an idea.
@@mrshankerbillletmein491 we don't know how life originated true but at least that's more honest than claiming some intelligent mind was behind it all. There's absolutely no proof of a 'god' because it's all faith and emotionally based.
Physicist Steven Weinberg, who won a Nobel prize for his theoretical contributions to the Standard Model of particle physics, has died. He was 88. Closer To Truth was fortunate enough to have had many inspiring conversations with Steven over the years. He will be greatly missed.
RIP to a great mind 😢
He gave until the end, a great man, a great life. And yes he will be missed.
😢♥️
Of course, you two are great people, but just looking at the calm tone, brown-based clothes and the room are like art. Thank you very much.
(Edit) *Steven Weinberg died today... R.I.P.*
Perhaps there is no death in theory.
NO words to write great people for humanity
A pleasure to hear such a great luminary in physics..I still have his early book, "The first 3 minutes" and it was paradigm shifting for me. Sadly Steven is correct in that string theory like an abandoned building is slowly falling down. There's an illustration here of the integrity and STRENGTH of science, the fundamental importance that ONLY the evidence matters, not biased attachments to any particular idea . Amazing interview, thanks..
wow .. i do love the honesty of this guy .. .wish more folks were like him . .thanks for this .. made my day ..
Stephen Weinberg the great mind of our time, elegantly explained the most complex theory of our universe.
Problem with String Theory is it comes with too many strings attached.
Not being separate from the world, true understanding follows a true understanding of ourselves.
The world just lost Steven Weinberg R.I.P.
I enjoy most of your videos. It would be nice if we knew when they are actually recorded. Thx
that one is surely of more that 10-12 years ago
What are the possible focuses string theory could have for a physical principle, like the equivalence principle for general relativity?
Hi.
Is the news of his death true?
Yes. His doctoral student John Preskill too tweeted about it.
Got to know when to hold em, know when to fold em, know when to walk away, know when to run (song - The Gambler) ((for string theory))
Since string theory goes along well with quantum wave function, maybe has to do with or is possible solution for quantum wave function / mechanics?
Between 10^100 and 10^500 the difference is so insanely huge.
Is there another way to string theory besides ten to the hundreds orders of magnitude possibilities, which is difficult to get arms around?
Coulombs Law and the correction of two fundamental errors in physics are all you need to produce a viable universal structure that leads to a TOE capable of describing the universe at all scales. When populated with CODATA published values, this methodology leads to a balanced atomic model that resolves perfectly to 41 decimal places and puts the physical back into physics.
Is string theory a possible part of solution to big bang start of universe or black holes? How would string theory apply to black holes and big bang start of universe?
Who is here after Steven Weinberg is no more
"There is no matter as such. All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the "particle" of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force is the existence of a conscious and intelligent Mind. This Mind is the MATRIX of all matter." - Max Planck, Father of Quantum Physics
"I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness."
… … …
"Anyone who becomes seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that there is a spirit manifest in the laws of the universe, a spirit vastly superior to that of man." - most famous physicist and philosopher Albert Einstein
… … …
"If quantum mechanics hasn’t profoundly shocked you, you haven’t understood it yet. Everything we call real is made of things that cannot be regarded as real.” - Niels Bohr, a Danish Physicist
… … …
"This most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being." - Sir Isaac Newton
This most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent being. And if the fixed Stars are the centers of other like systems, these, being formed by the like wise counsel, must all be subject to the dominion of One. [...] This Being Governs all things, not as the soul of the world, but as Lord over all: And on account of his dominion he is wont to be called Lord God παντοκρατωρ, or Universal Ruler.
~ from General Scholium written by Sir Isaac Newton
Isn't it awesome even Newton could be wrong. Science: it works, bitches ; - )
Taking quotes from smart people out of their context is not a very smart idea. Now you know less than before, when you didn't even start thinking about these questions.
Atoms are plasma like, but particles doesn't revolve around nucleus, nothing resembles solar system since we don't have quantum gravity theory.
Since string theory has many possibilities, could try to reason backward from possibilities / probabilities in quantum wave function?
Can you derive mathematics back from 42 is the answer?
@@xspotbox4400 reason back from 42 to numbers to mathematics, unless did not understand question correctly
What is the reason in a theory of everything that the force of expansion is not considered, but only gravity?
@Ali Talei Many thanks for the reply to my post. In that case it means we will remain frustrated in our attempts to explain eveything (G.U.T.), until science is able to understand the function of dark energy.
A unified theory is not possible because at the heart of the problem is the dual arrow of time. QM works in Backward time and the Macro world in Forward time. Big Bang needs modification for Backward Time and then you get Dark Matter out of it.(Antimatter surviving Big Bang due to alternate quantum phase) Matter and antimatter ( surviving on large scale) are the source of Dark Energy. The two repel each other on the large scale, before they have a chance to mutually annihilate.
Is this a recent interview?
The out-of-focus start is less cool than you may think it is. Fade in from black, just after speakers have started speaking is, I think, more effective and comfortable.
I think it's more from a conceptual POV that they're going to make something that's typically hard to understand (blurry) and make it clearer. From a purely aesthetic POV a fade in from black might look better though.
"We don't really know what string theory is yet" ..i was almost chocking with my orange juice , spitted all over the keyboard .... :D
String theory is just a general field of mathematical speculations, other gifts to humanity from same kind of people are big bang, inflation, black holes, gravity waves, Higgs boson,... every idea that can't be directly observed or verified by any experimental means.
This is not science, it's ideology, based on convincing hypothetical models meant to bring scientific understanding closer to primitive cultures, by trying to explain how divine miracles and magic might be possible to understand in a new global mental framework.
@@xspotbox4400 I fear that at the end the only good thing we will get from the String Theory is Sheldon ....
Let’s be clear 🐰 a theory is an principle substantiated by data…however by no means proven
@Soul Seeker the orange juice merged with various food remains, giving quantum patterns as the keys are collapsing due to background stickiness
The gravity problem is that it is not being considered as originating from higher dimensions. Once you do, the problems will be solved!
RIP Weinberg
Sad to hear that he died... Rest in peace Steven Weinberg.
I'm glad he passed the pawn shop to Rick and Cory and got into a more serious endeavor.
EDIT: Sad to hear of his death. My light-hearted joke was just that. RIP, Steven Weinberg. 💕
How many times it was said “we do not know” :)
At the end Weinberg says: unfortunately, string theory is the only direction that we know. What about QFT? I always thought QFT was also very promising.
QFT doesn't incorporate gravity. Sure, there is a versions of QFT in curved spacetime, but spacetime in QFT is always a fixed background. Steven Weinberg wrote 3 volume book named Quantum Theory of Fields. It's very complex reading. First volume with subtitle "Foundations" has 609 pages and you already need to have excellent foundation in advanced quantum mechanics and deep knowledge of mathematical and theoretical physics to be able to read it with understanding.
String Theory is indeed considered a QFT, there are many theoretical frameworks let’s call them that qualify, or meet all the requirements, for membership into group classification as a genuine QFT. You will see many skeptics and idiots these days who, with no formal training or education, simply go against string theory but mostly do so just to be different, to look smart and edgy. The fact is, they don’t understand the enterprise, or the game of theoretical physics. They can use fancy words all they want like unfalsifiability, or say that science is evidence based etc. well no shit of course it is, but that doesn’t stop THEORETICAL researchers from introducing new types of objects with various properties, throw them into toy model universes and see what happens to its logical end, that with various abstract objects equipped with certain properties and parameters which govern or restrict their behaviors, the rich structures that may naturally emerge can be studied as much as they desire. It so happens that with strings, a rich enough structure emerged that at least seemed to be able to fit gravity into a quantum mechanical framework seemingly naturally, and therefore it would be quite obvious as to why they would want to continue researching these objects, and to believe in its potential in that at the very least they may have been on some sort of right tracking of thinking. The parrots of course will say “but you can’t probe strings!” oh so since our technology is not yet able to resolve any of these objects it therefore means it’s not real science, because it cannot be tested experimentally? There is a distinction between things that cannot be tested experimentally due perhaps to insufficient technologies or as yet undiscovered strategies and ideas, and those which cannot even in PRINCIPLE be tested experimentally. A proposal for a theory which could never possibly be tested experimentally, not even indirectly, well something like that could very well be argued as a dead end. However, entire frameworks which have been constructed by talented experts within the field, which are not in principle untestable, and at the outset at a minimum seem to be not only good candidates but also steps in the right direction of thought itself in seeking answers to some problem, in this case the problem of quantum gravity, yeah there’s no way something like that could just be put aside and not explored.
Rest in peace
Theory of Everything already exists - it is in the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"
Hi Valentin, I'm interested in new scientific theories and I'd like to read this book. Is it possible to download a pdf version of it on some website?
@@maciejchrapkiewicz2548 I can send you a PDF, just give me some address
We know how all physical laws work that created the universe and everything in it, but we don't know the axioms that created the fundamental laws themselves.
It Will be not too difficult to find the explanation of the Fundamental Law - It is in the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"
Sir i m invent tree sensorable Ai algorithm or tree sensor computer system and power acceptor large machine. This power acceptor help update new type quantum computer India India
I don't believe you, prove it, give us some description of your concept, provide links to your work, or you're only yet another delusional fool.
What is the origin of light itself?
Quantum electromagnetic force field.
The light globe!
Certainly not God!!!
R I P
Steven Winberg
May 3, 1933 - July 23, 2021
He passed away one day after publication of this video.
They didn't revealed the nature of death yet??
@@suatustel746
"Weinberg died on July 23, 2021, at age 88, at a hospital in Austin, where he had been treated for several weeks" - from Wiki.
It is sad to see him passing 😢 but,indeed, general relativity and especially relativity of Einstein would totally agree that he, although, is not with us but surely he is ALL AROUND US IN A REALLY PHYSICAL MEANING OUT THERE IN SPACE- TIME. He was very elegant and concise in the way he explained difficult ideas. Thank you closer to truth. You are doing an excellent job 👏.
A confusing conversation
fancy ways to say "I dunno"
RIP
Steven is no more
Hi
There's no theory of everything because everything is not a theory...
good one !
Love it:)❤️
It actually is.
Everything is the law.
Don't be surprised! - The final theory exists! - It is in the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"
I love how materialists accuse the other side of anthropocentrism, while they maintain only humans are conscious. And while stating explicitly that things like atoms do not have consciousness, refer to genes as “selfish.”
If atoms could be intelligent and self-aware, why do we have so large and complicated brains?
String is not agreeing with reality
Sleep with feet elevated 6 inchs one end, sleep with feet at raised end,free energy awaits ,costs nothing ,meet your soul energy =microbes ,light,dark energy ,meet your dark energy!!!!!!
Newton 100 p. Einstein 97 p. Maxwell 93 p. Dirac 80 p. Feynman 70 p. Schwinger 70 p. Weinberg 60 p --- my judgement on their Intellectual power
Some say E8 theory is a better candidate.
We're not riding anymore; we're surfing.
RIP SW. Thanks for the unification theory of weak and em forces.
"God" has become to personalized, thus greatly subjective. Many today, when they speak of "God", are really meaning "ego".
God isn't what you think God is.
God's religion isn't what you think God's religion is.
God's book isn't what you believe his book to be.
God's ideology isn't what your ideology is.
Your ego is not God.
God is not ego.
God is not like us, however part of us is like God.
Souce, or Light is a better reference for God.
Source:
We're talking about the very ineffable fabric of the universe, the life force that gives sustenance to ALL.
The very form of all things, balances, motion.
The soul that moves the mover.
The laws of nature, force, elements, qualities.
The creation, manifestation, generation, transformation.
Intellect, conscioussness, thought, imagination, reason.
Being. Living. Experiencing. Implementing. Creating.
Wow, a lot of common points with my perception. Thanks.
That's not comment, it's poetry. And a bad one, if i may say so.
Interesting thesis, I really enjoyed watching this. Big fan of Astronomy and Astrology, the Astrological Age Cycle and Solstices are caused by the KT Boundary.
What will happen if one cut a string?
A dot?
Actually, It is reverse, When you cut a dot you will get a string which is the most fundamental and deepest basis of everything.
@@kartikjoshi1035 can you prove that....a theorem or something likes that?
Perhaps everything is theory?
Is string theory a theory?or can it be proven?
The Tao ,God's Providence, the Order of Nature and time so Tao had No fundamental reason to chose otherwise and you would have to know all darkness to Be capable of 10 to the 500 more choices than participating particles of time and space so I like Carl Sagan thoughts on the Hindu universe
At the end of the day, those who claim that the world exists whether you’re looking at it or not, can never actually prove that this is the case.
The same can be said of your existence, so good luck with that vantage point
@@Robinson8491 Confused, if not inapplicable. You must be the only person here that doesn’t understand, “I think therefore I am.” That I exist is in fact the only thing I can prove.
@@lr2357 yes Descartes ruminations are the pinnacle of metaphysical reasoning. This was the time before Newton etc. I think you could say there has been some advancements in the counter reasoning.
I always dislike people who say 'you can't prove it'. They remind me of the high school bullies who had no real arguments except that comment. And felt they were winning because of it. Empty retoric.
Let's say I don't look at the moon. I ask you 'do you see the moon'? You say yes. I trust you, therefore I accept the moon exists without me looking at it. If you want to argue with this, you need to argue the definition of 'existing' and 'proving'. For instance, does it need to be expressed mathematically? Good luck with untangling this rhetorical jungle.
Also many philosophers claim the 'I' that Descartes refers to is an illusion, as well as identity, so the I claiming to do the thinking would be an illusion. Can you prove this is not the case? Therefore Descartes conclusion is also dubious. Etcetera etcetera infinite regress
Also you say you can prove you exist because you think. I don't trust your authority as an individual, as I cannot prove you exist (because like you said, it is impossible for me to prove the world exists). So your proof is only a private one for yourself; useless to me. So what is the value of your private proof to me? You could be a philosophical zombie just making statements. So for me it is impossible to prove you exist just like I can't prove the world exists.
I exist according to me. But I or me could be an illusion. Pfff there is a reason why nobody likes to argue metaphysical bullies. Because in the end you get stuck in a loop
I can go on for ever on this slippery slope of empty statements in reply to yours that started it
@@Robinson8491 Right. I am one of the things in the world that you can’t prove exists, Descartes or no Descartes. I have no idea what bullies saying “you can’t prove it,” would even be referring to. Having said that, I didn’t get bullied because I’m not one of the dorks.. the very dorks that turn people off of science, as nobody in their right mind would want to be associated with the kinds of kids that tend to be into science. And this is kind of my point, (speaking from the gut) people like Dawkins and Krauss are going to tell me about human consciousness when they don’t understand being human well enough to tell a joke, bust a move, talk to girls, or dress themselves. No wonder they think the universe is rigid and not self-aware-they aren’t even self aware, and they project this onto the world at large. In fact i suspect that it is this very “nerdiness” that prevents many scientists from progressing. They’ve taken us far, but lack the imagination and creativity to comprehend the very abstract, new scientific territory we’ve entered into.
And this sentiment has been echoed by Frank Wilczek in the introduction of “A Beautiful Question.”
Peekaboo...
Roger penrose counterpart
You brains can find destination, I don’t know why, we should use the difficult words, likes Meta 4 , and string, and etc .. I can explain the theory of creation by biological language ! But not now
Please explain it to me.
Maybe you think you can, because you experience euphoria about those problems for some reason, but you actually can't.
I didn’t get anything outta this
Yes, that was just speculation. If you are interested to know the final theory, you can find it in the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"
Sadly there are a lot of anti-intellectuals in the comments 😕
Are the intellectuals steering our world in a good direction these days? I say not. So, to give them credence over an intuitive and common sense view is not high on my list. Intellectuals should be considered, obviously, but they simply do not deserve unquestioned oracle status.
What is Everything? Everything is the universe(all things exist) excluded The God because He is not a thing.
Where is the universe? The universe is information/knowledge in one conscious mind space thus it is the inverted/reciprocal of the real universal physical space.
Stephen Weinberg seems to claim that string theory is a theory in search of a theory.
Probably is exactly like that. They pretending that the final Theory does not exist! - Wrong! - Just type in Amazon books the book title - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" and You will find out the truth!
Just heard the sad news that Steven Weinberg has sadly passed away 🥲 thank you for all your contributions to science and physics RIP SIR 🙏
Rest in peace.
Off the top of my head I would say that the string in the universe is human intention. If the flow of gravity can go in One Direction, but man can counteract that flow and go in the opposite direction, then the argument can be made that the universe revolves around man’s intention
I want that drugs you take...
@@matusfrisik3887it's very embarrassing to think someone out there is so delusional as to think they can improve sting theory off the top of their head
Yet all theory incomplete.
And now he's dead 😭😭😭
RIP
Theo...ry. Theo...retical. Theo...logy. Theo...dore. Notice the inclusion of a God ?
You're confused about the difference between the roots theōros and theos. To be brief, "theory" does not include any god.
Nope
My theory for everything thing is "consciousness causes energy which in turn causes matter"
String theory is obviously false by virtue of the fact that it involves strings of differing lengths. This was so obvious from the outset it wasn't funny. So the problem with these theorists, is that they're not good at logic and philosophy.
If your fundamental entity has different forms or lengths, then it can't be the fundamental entity. Duh!!!!!
R.I.P. .....another great mind gone 😢😥😓
God is a fairy tale for those who are afraid of darkness- A materialist. Science is a fairly tale for those who are afraid of light- John Lennox.
And theists and atheists are equally annoying with their lying claims of "I know God does [or not] exist." The fact is no one knows, and a real scientist will tell you they are agnostic.
The kicker is Light and dark are one in the same.
@@S3RAVA3LM yeah!!
@@S3RAVA3LM everything is a wave - sort of. Not even the trained quantum physicists really know.
To think that everything is reducible to some equations so simple that you can print them on your tee shirt is the greatest illusion of our times.
It is not an illusion but is a reality. The complete geometrical diagram of the Universe you can print on your tee shirt. The theory exists - Just find the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" The diagram is there!
Illusion?
What if my t-shirt is in Size: 14 billion lights years!
Steve theory everything, string is incostence reality Universe . Steve problems is thinking his solution like Einstein God opens door mystetuos to them. Viu mistakes snob guys.
English: do you speak it?
Just write what you think in your native language, if you can't improvise global English, so people can use automated translators if they're interested in your opinion.
Rich elite buyin folk, who narrate - NOT science. Click bat......HE JUST NARRATED, 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🖖🤓❤️✌️ clickbate
🤡
Nonsense
Gobbledygook
Desparate attemps to explain everything without the need for God it seems to me
gAwD dUn iT
@@CeezGeez It was evolution what dunnit innit
@@mrshankerbillletmein491 actually yes
@@CeezGeez I dont have enough faith to believe in the unguided developement of life from non living matter to a single cell capable of reproducing itself all the way to human its a real stretch of the imagination people seem willing to believe without knowledge and understanding let alone proof its just an idea.
@@mrshankerbillletmein491 we don't know how life originated true but at least that's more honest than claiming some intelligent mind was behind it all. There's absolutely no proof of a 'god' because it's all faith and emotionally based.
Theory of everything......BS!!
There is such a theory. It is in the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"
Big brain 🥴
RIP
RIP
RIP