Not giving jury instructions about the death penalty means whoever can fill the jury with incompetent feelers will win. Is there no room even for basic common sense in our system of "justice"?!
why are people suffering in chronic pain allowed to suffer cruel and unusual punishment by being denied medication that relives their suffering? No one defends their rights;@te
Due process is not a right, it's a weapon used against those who believe it's a right. The government can/will do whatever it wants, regardless of your rights, and as long as they followed their own rules, however immoral, you will be told your "right" has been upheld. Likewise, "a jury of your peers" no longer means people who have any connection, understanding of, or similarity to you". "Cruel and unusual punishment" isn't meaningful any longer because they do whatever they want for a long time until someone can afford to bring it up in court, by which time it's no longer unusual. The game is rigged at every level.
31:31 so long it is a jury of the defendants peers and well balanced by the court of appeal while choosing the jury. One does not decide to allow two men to be put by death by dismemberment with over 2000 people watching: especially when pyromania drives into the crowd with the refreshment of a nuclear bomb for them. Good movie with 2 cups of coffee btw. Humans do not hold the right to kill humans. The hand of g-d does.
If the highest court in the land cannot make an ethical decision about the most important issue in front of their court, they are completely incompetent. I can do it using a fraction of my ethical skills, as could any decent philosopher.
Not giving jury instructions about the death penalty means whoever can fill the jury with incompetent feelers will win. Is there no room even for basic common sense in our system of "justice"?!
Being required to use or suppress your emotions cannot both be ethical.
why are people suffering in chronic pain allowed to suffer cruel and unusual punishment by being denied medication that relives their suffering? No one defends their rights;@te
subtítulos en español por favor! 😟
Due process is not a right, it's a weapon used against those who believe it's a right. The government can/will do whatever it wants, regardless of your rights, and as long as they followed their own rules, however immoral, you will be told your "right" has been upheld.
Likewise, "a jury of your peers" no longer means people who have any connection, understanding of, or similarity to you". "Cruel and unusual punishment" isn't meaningful any longer because they do whatever they want for a long time until someone can afford to bring it up in court, by which time it's no longer unusual. The game is rigged at every level.
Its becoming unconstitutional because the higher ups keep messing up. Yeah it sucks but I am for the death penalty.
31:31 so long it is a jury of the defendants peers and well balanced by the court of appeal while choosing the jury.
One does not decide to allow two men to be put by death by dismemberment with over 2000 people watching: especially when pyromania drives into the crowd with the refreshment of a nuclear bomb for them.
Good movie with 2 cups of coffee btw.
Humans do not hold the right to kill humans. The hand of g-d does.
If the highest court in the land cannot make an ethical decision about the most important issue in front of their court, they are completely incompetent. I can do it using a fraction of my ethical skills, as could any decent philosopher.