So much conflict comes from the timing of out calls affecting shots. It's clear that nobody, either ref or player, can accurately recall whether the call came after the shot or not. It's absurd to me that a ref is supposed to make a judgement call based on what they thought happened even though there is no way to accurately recall something as fast as that unless you were focusing entirely on it, which a ref can't do. They have cameras recording all of these games, they should just watch the recording to check any close calls and get rid of any conflict. It might take time to pull up the recording, but so much is time is wasted already by arguing that it'd be worth it. Not to mention it'd just be much fairer.
Is there a reason as to why the line judges dont just call a like half a second later. It should be enough so the hit goes through without distraction and the player can still challenge afterwards. All the arguments would be solved immedietly.
99% of the calls don't affect at all the shot, since with really few exceptions there's no time for a reaction. If the player miss the shot there a three case: 1 he/she would have hit wrong anyway 2 he/she thought he was out and stopped before even listen the call 3 he/she stopped because of it' a winner and couldn't even reach the ball So points should never be replayed unless is a very slow shot (such as a lob) that was clearly playable if not called; but it's one in a milion
@@m.d.a8868 players sometimes stop because they hear line umpire calling "out" and they dont even try to continue playing (sometimes they dont even try to hit the ball back and sometimes they will hit it intentionally in the net and not play a proper shot just because they heard a call was made by an umpire). If that ball is then challenged and its in, it should absolutely one hundred percent be replayed. Obviously if they hit the ball back in the court after the wrong call was made, point is always replayed as it should be. So there are plenty of examples when a point should be and is replayed, but it is always because an umpire made a wrong call, nothing to do with the players
@@babobereta what I meant is that considering the speed of the shots during a rally, in most of the cases it's actually impossible that a player can stop because of a wrong call (we can say 100% of the times, speaking about returning a serve). It's pretty clear at the slow motion that there's no time to react at the call; they just pretend to have been stopped by the call when they miss the shot or don't even have a chance to hit the ball. There are only few exceptions, easy to spot for the umpire, when the shot is particularly slow (a lob for example) or "short" (it bounce befor the half of the court) where you can change the stance or leave a ball because is called out. So almost every time a ball is challenged after an out call and hawk eye shows it was in, it should be treated like a late call, without replaying the point, unless it's a clearly slow or short shot.
@@m.d.a8868 it is not that simple, aces and clear winners are obviously not what is being questioned here. You can just watch videos from this channel alone, besides frustrations and raquet breaking, many of the controversial situations are players and chair umpire arguing about when the call was made and whether a point should be replayed. Players are even instructed by the umpires before the match not to continue playing if they hear a call by the umpire. Tennis is a weird sport compared to other popular sports and players usually play in complete silence where even the slighest noise or movement can disturb them. Even the players themselves say that there are a lot of grey areas in the rules of tennis which are being interpreted by the umpires differently in similar, or sometimes even same situations. So for you to say that the players are always just pretending is just not true. Players dont play every point by hitting every ball full strength, there is lot of tactics involved,and at the pro level, what seems to be a really fast shot for you or me, its something completely different for a top player. And then you have to factor in ladies tennis which is much slower and a lot different to mens tennis. So its much more complicated than "players are always pretending and the point should never be replayed" logic which you are pushing
i was watching it like, "Garin and Zverev played two times already in Wimbledon? Today there were only first round matches, and then I saw Barty playing and I was like "Wtf?". And then I realised it's from last year's Wimbledon
Zverev is right if it start raining they must close the roof 20 minutes before the game started. Not until grass is wash then they start closing the roof 🙏
The thing is the grass gets slimy as soon as the roof is closed because it gets so humid inside. There's a level of minimal rain that's not enough to merit closing the roof.
Please do a drama compilation of just the Kyrgios vs Tsitsipas Wimbledon 3rd round match. So much material and we're still only in the 3rd set a the time of writing, with at least 1 more set after this. Crazy match.
The longer I watch these videos, the more I hate Opelka. Everything bothers him. He acts like the tiniest of details has a huge negative impact on his performance. I simply cannot stand his diva personality.
Welcome to tennis, i guess. It's crazy to me that so many sports are played where crowd and other noise is a given, and concentration is supposed to be a skill, but in tennis it's a problem if you hear the camera shutter lol
@@WonderWhatHappened I do lol, I collected this info last summer when I literally had nothing to do for a couple of days, now I just update it as videos are uploaded
Okay is anyone going to comment on how generally rude Opelka has been in these videos? Every time he appears in this he’s insulting umpires and the way tournaments are ran, and in this one he’s complaining about a small thing and is telling the umpire to do something just because he wants something his way. Maybe he’s just like that but he seems to be very rude to others.
I mean even though he is quite rude he still does have a point, to get a time violation in that situation is very annoying. And to also get fiend for it is even more annoying!
The double bounce from Lao was fairly clear at first glance. If you zoom in and replay it at slow speed, it's even clearer. Boulter was hard done by in both those moments.
These "call came before/after the shot" are so ridiculous. The calls are definitely loud enough to distract, plus if you're quick enough you're just gonna dispose of the ball and keep the rhytm of serves and returns and what not. The thing I'm noticing is that most of the time, these "before/after" things are completely reverse and incorrect. Every time someone said it's after, it was actually just before or at the same time, while when they said it was before, it was actually after. Khachanov case was okay, but the one before I think not. Have a fricking video review and that's it. Also, if it's a correction, have a rule that either says replay the point, or give the point away, because this "either way" thing has proved to be stupid so many times.
There's always at least one guy in the comment section of every single one of this channel WTA-based videos saying how confrontational women are, but every time there's a mixed WTA-ATP compilation it shows that this behaviour is more prevalent in the men's game. Not only there are way more childishly stupid well-known spoiled brats in the ATP, the disputes take much more to settle down and usually the bickering and talking with the umpire lasts throughout the whole match.
In every grand slam tournament the organisers publish a list of fines players have been handed, usually the men get 3 times more then the women, and even the women who gets fined it's mostly for coaching. Men mostly for unsportsmanlike conduct, ball abuse, racquet abuse, audible obscenity, so yup, men behaviour is much worst 🤷🏻♀️
So, um, guys, i'm not so good at tennis, but please explain me: what's the problem with changing the rules to "call out only after the player hit the ball'' like in football, where nowadays they call offside only after the attack is finished? Wouldn't it solve the late or early call problems?
The "white woman" is the supervisor. If she says it can't be done, he has to accept that. Plus that particular umpire doesn't have the best English, so he possibly didn't get across the point that it wasn't permitted vs he just didn't want to do it. I'm not a fan of Sascha's, but I don't think he did anything wrong in asking for clarification.
Anyone stop to wonder how so many NON English speaking players speak English so well, yet the majority of English speaking players fail to do the same at tournaments in non English speaking countries?
When i watch these, only thing what can i think in common sense is, that judges, referees and linesman are simply ridiculous, stupid and unqualified for their task. But, who cares... its always nice to see when judges make wrong, ridiculous and stupid calls. That's all.
I wonder is there massive ref and ump corruption to influence games that the players know about? Half of the problems are players accusing officials of weighted calls
I suare, i dont understand those Umpires. They make he Call "" OOOOUUUUT "" loud and clearly....then, they say "" it didnt affect your shot "" WHHHHHATTTTT ??? How the hell the umpire stop the game and then say he doesnt have impavt on the playr shot? are they serious or have some kind of mental disorder Its like the decision about rainning on Zverev Game !! ahahahaha What kind of logic is that ..."" if starts to rain heavier, we stop , wait outside while he covering the court ahahahahah oh my Goddddddddd !!!! ahahahah. P.S I´m sorry about my grammar errors, i´m Portuguese
There's not way Khachanov was affected by these calls. Totally correct decision by the umpire in my opinion. These shots were way too fast that the calls could have happened at the same time.
*slams racquet*
“I want bananas”
I was expecting him to then immediately follow up with, "where are my bananas?!"
I feel bad for players when they’re actually right about a wrong call and the crowds just booing them
So much conflict comes from the timing of out calls affecting shots. It's clear that nobody, either ref or player, can accurately recall whether the call came after the shot or not. It's absurd to me that a ref is supposed to make a judgement call based on what they thought happened even though there is no way to accurately recall something as fast as that unless you were focusing entirely on it, which a ref can't do. They have cameras recording all of these games, they should just watch the recording to check any close calls and get rid of any conflict. It might take time to pull up the recording, but so much is time is wasted already by arguing that it'd be worth it. Not to mention it'd just be much fairer.
Is there a reason as to why the line judges dont just call a like half a second later. It should be enough so the hit goes through without distraction and the player can still challenge afterwards. All the arguments would be solved immedietly.
99% of the calls don't affect at all the shot, since with really few exceptions there's no time for a reaction.
If the player miss the shot there a three case:
1 he/she would have hit wrong anyway
2 he/she thought he was out and stopped before even listen the call
3 he/she stopped because of it' a winner and couldn't even reach the ball
So points should never be replayed unless is a very slow shot (such as a lob) that was clearly playable if not called; but it's one in a milion
@@m.d.a8868 players sometimes stop because they hear line umpire calling "out" and they dont even try to continue playing (sometimes they dont even try to hit the ball back and sometimes they will hit it intentionally in the net and not play a proper shot just because they heard a call was made by an umpire). If that ball is then challenged and its in, it should absolutely one hundred percent be replayed. Obviously if they hit the ball back in the court after the wrong call was made, point is always replayed as it should be. So there are plenty of examples when a point should be and is replayed, but it is always because an umpire made a wrong call, nothing to do with the players
@@babobereta what I meant is that considering the speed of the shots during a rally, in most of the cases it's actually impossible that a player can stop because of a wrong call (we can say 100% of the times, speaking about returning a serve).
It's pretty clear at the slow motion that there's no time to react at the call; they just pretend to have been stopped by the call when they miss the shot or don't even have a chance to hit the ball.
There are only few exceptions, easy to spot for the umpire, when the shot is particularly slow (a lob for example) or "short" (it bounce befor the half of the court) where you can change the stance or leave a ball because is called out.
So almost every time a ball is challenged after an out call and hawk eye shows it was in, it should be treated like a late call, without replaying the point, unless it's a clearly slow or short shot.
@@m.d.a8868 it is not that simple, aces and clear winners are obviously not what is being questioned here. You can just watch videos from this channel alone, besides frustrations and raquet breaking, many of the controversial situations are players and chair umpire arguing about when the call was made and whether a point should be replayed. Players are even instructed by the umpires before the match not to continue playing if they hear a call by the umpire. Tennis is a weird sport compared to other popular sports and players usually play in complete silence where even the slighest noise or movement can disturb them. Even the players themselves say that there are a lot of grey areas in the rules of tennis which are being interpreted by the umpires differently in similar, or sometimes even same situations. So for you to say that the players are always just pretending is just not true. Players dont play every point by hitting every ball full strength, there is lot of tactics involved,and at the pro level, what seems to be a really fast shot for you or me, its something completely different for a top player. And then you have to factor in ladies tennis which is much slower and a lot different to mens tennis. So its much more complicated than "players are always pretending and the point should never be replayed" logic which you are pushing
Your videos must take a lot of work. Thank you for creating this it’s so entertaining
🙏💚
Thank you❤️
I want bananas
ya comete la maldita banana
Two great videos today, this is my favorite channel ever, i wait every month for one of two of this videos, is like a drug.
🙏💚
Over the years, Opelka has been upset about the sun, music, and towels.
Must be great fun at the beach.
i was watching it like, "Garin and Zverev played two times already in Wimbledon? Today there were only first round matches, and then I saw Barty playing and I was like "Wtf?". And then I realised it's from last year's Wimbledon
Bro Karen was in the video, that’s how you know it’s not from this year 🤣
@@cepibanikovec Obv
not very smart are you? it clearly says 2021 I don't know how can the uploader make it more obvious
Zverev with his injury is less probable to play than Barty nowadays
Can’t get anything past you
Zverev is right if it start raining they must close the roof 20 minutes before the game started. Not until grass is wash then they start closing the roof 🙏
They usually close it when it all gets wet and palyers slip on the grass and get injured.
The thing is the grass gets slimy as soon as the roof is closed because it gets so humid inside. There's a level of minimal rain that's not enough to merit closing the roof.
Please do a drama compilation of just the Kyrgios vs Tsitsipas Wimbledon 3rd round match. So much material and we're still only in the 3rd set a the time of writing, with at least 1 more set after this. Crazy match.
No thank you, i had enough drama from this clown to last for a lifetime 🤮
The longer I watch these videos, the more I hate Opelka. Everything bothers him. He acts like the tiniest of details has a huge negative impact on his performance. I simply cannot stand his diva personality.
Same. Couldn't have it said better
Welcome to tennis, i guess. It's crazy to me that so many sports are played where crowd and other noise is a given, and concentration is supposed to be a skill, but in tennis it's a problem if you hear the camera shutter lol
@@amaldesai6323 golf is the same. Rich spoiled white kids complaining about everything.
Omg at 3:40 you can see that zverev is like twice the height of the ref😂😂
Appearance leaderboard (2+)
Paire 24
Putintseva 16
Ostapenko, Kyrgios 12
Fognini 10
Moutet 8
Sakkari 7
Cornet, Djokovic, Tsitsipas, Sandgren 6
Medvedev, Collins, Van Uytvank, Evans, Shapovalov, Siniakova, Zverev, Tauson, Khachanov 5
Dzumhur, Zhang, Shapovalov, Giorgi, Tomljanovic, Karatsev, Opelka 4
Tig, Wozniacki, Mladenovic, Olivo, Sock, Bublik, Yastremska, Rublev, Ruud, Gulbis, Simon 3
Giorgi's dad, Pouille, Gautier, Kokkinakis, Azarenka, Hurkacz, Juvan, Verdasco, McNally, Siegemund, Pliskova, Stephens, Golubic, Haddad Maia, Thompson, Dimitrov, Rune, Schwartzman, Ivashka, Auger-Aliassime, Roca Batalla, Martinez, Garín 2
Very impressive. Please tell me you have a life away from your computer though.
@@WonderWhatHappened I do lol, I collected this info last summer when I literally had nothing to do for a couple of days, now I just update it as videos are uploaded
Thanks mate, legend 🤘🏼🤘🏼
Kyrgios only 12?
Giorgi's dad already twice 💀💀
Okay is anyone going to comment on how generally rude Opelka has been in these videos? Every time he appears in this he’s insulting umpires and the way tournaments are ran, and in this one he’s complaining about a small thing and is telling the umpire to do something just because he wants something his way. Maybe he’s just like that but he seems to be very rude to others.
i've noticed lately just how rude opelka is.. wow
Quite well behaved for a Sasquatch.
I mean even though he is quite rude he still does have a point, to get a time violation in that situation is very annoying. And to also get fiend for it is even more annoying!
He is right most of the times
He's got aspergers syndrome
You are on fire right now! Love it.
🙏💚
Siniakova def hit her foot.
Umpires are legally blind
Opelka is stupidly sensitive
"I want bananaaaas. I want bananas"
"If it starts to rain, we pull you off" .... ooooo that's a bit naughty 🤣
Thank you for the generous uploads.
🙏💚
Ya know Opelka is kind of a brat
Wait... No Paire????
only because he said he's taking a break
I can’t wait for tennis advocate video of this year Wimbledon lolll
Omg 7:45 that has to be the worst call ever. It was inside the line by 3 inches.
I
Want
Bananas.
😂
LOL.
the physical evidence that Sandgren has more balls than Zverev ever will, what a man
Line umpires for that Khachanov-McDonald match were awful...
Simon: I want bananas!
Me: You ARE bananas.
The double bounce from Lao was fairly clear at first glance. If you zoom in and replay it at slow speed, it's even clearer. Boulter was hard done by in both those moments.
4:50 is nobody going to call foot fault there? It's Opelka, he needs no extra advantage on serves.
Moral of the story - Lahyani can’t see a double bounce. While he is personable he’s not very competent.
He's human never will escape of mistakes
Siniakova definetly hit her shoe/foot not grass. Umpire was wrong.
Please make an entire video on the Kyrgios vs tsitsipas match. Deserves more than just a part in a bigger vid!
Zverev said HOW MUCH MORE YOU WANNA PLAY
These "call came before/after the shot" are so ridiculous. The calls are definitely loud enough to distract, plus if you're quick enough you're just gonna dispose of the ball and keep the rhytm of serves and returns and what not. The thing I'm noticing is that most of the time, these "before/after" things are completely reverse and incorrect. Every time someone said it's after, it was actually just before or at the same time, while when they said it was before, it was actually after. Khachanov case was okay, but the one before I think not. Have a fricking video review and that's it.
Also, if it's a correction, have a rule that either says replay the point, or give the point away, because this "either way" thing has proved to be stupid so many times.
I'm hoping Tauson rises in profile - she has plenty of 'Tennis Advocate Video' meltdown potential in my opinion.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 well in arrogance she's literally Wozniacki younger
The umps wear nicer clothes at Wimbledon, but still make the same shitty calls.
There's always at least one guy in the comment section of every single one of this channel WTA-based videos saying how confrontational women are, but every time there's a mixed WTA-ATP compilation it shows that this behaviour is more prevalent in the men's game. Not only there are way more childishly stupid well-known spoiled brats in the ATP, the disputes take much more to settle down and usually the bickering and talking with the umpire lasts throughout the whole match.
Spot on. I always say that men are worse drama queens than women in tennis
@@patrikiosvatemanopoulos it's because they play real games
In every grand slam tournament the organisers publish a list of fines players have been handed, usually the men get 3 times more then the women, and even the women who gets fined it's mostly for coaching. Men mostly for unsportsmanlike conduct, ball abuse, racquet abuse, audible obscenity, so yup, men behaviour is much worst 🤷🏻♀️
It's obvious... women still having a maturity men in general won't reach soon
I’m excited for tennis grass court drama 2022
So, um, guys, i'm not so good at tennis, but please explain me: what's the problem with changing the rules to "call out only after the player hit the ball'' like in football, where nowadays they call offside only after the attack is finished? Wouldn't it solve the late or early call problems?
It could yeah. I think they call it fast so that it's clear what shot they are calling out
1:14 umpire is right. She hit the ball about 300 ms before the call. I watched it at 0.25 speed. She would hit the net without a call.
No Paire???!!??! This must be a first!
Why these hell don't they instruct lines callers to wait just a stitch (0.5sec) to verbalize the call. It would save so much time and trouble.
Mohammed: I can’t close it while you play
Zverev: I don’t understand your logic
White woman: we can’t
Zverev: oh okay
Based zverev
The "white woman" is the supervisor. If she says it can't be done, he has to accept that. Plus that particular umpire doesn't have the best English, so he possibly didn't get across the point that it wasn't permitted vs he just didn't want to do it. I'm not a fan of Sascha's, but I don't think he did anything wrong in asking for clarification.
Checcinato’s career never get high after win against Novak on RG 19
When did Jim Halpert become a tennis pro?
Please someone needs to explain zverev "closing" a roof is not like closing a door. It costs a lot due to energy spent in the process.
Anyone stop to wonder how so many NON English speaking players speak English so well, yet the majority of English speaking players fail to do the same at tournaments in non English speaking countries?
i'm starting to think opelka is a very entitled individual... dude's making a fuss out of minute things all the time
opelka has the maturity in arguing of a very tall elementary school kid
Player can always play but umpire has his/her own reputation on the line
I closed my eyes and i’ve seen kyrgios instead of opelka
If he had said "I'm done man I'm not even playing" I would agree 😂
The plan is, I'm sitting there.
She's offering to pull the players off. That's a very generous offer!
siniakova hit her foot for sure
When i watch these, only thing what can i think in common sense is, that judges, referees and linesman are simply ridiculous, stupid and unqualified for their task. But, who cares... its always nice to see when judges make wrong, ridiculous and stupid calls. That's all.
Waiting for drama queens
it sucks that he can't get anyone's bananas
In the first clip umpire was wrong. The call affected Boulter's shot, because it came slightly before Boulter made her shot.
That towel thing seems like a serious issue or he seems like a baby!
10:38 see Balls Lives Matter too
Stamp out Ball Abuse
Opelka makes me laugh no idea why
Wimbledon HAS RULES -
I miss Viktor Troicki. His meltdowns were epic.
He's Serbia's 2023 Davis Cup captain. Perhaps he had a meltdown when You-Know-Who lost twice in the SF to Sinner.
I wonder is there massive ref and ump corruption to influence games that the players know about? Half of the problems are players accusing officials of weighted calls
Tauson is a big whiny baby complain about everything lol😅😅
Paire is injured
Tennis umpires are awful, much worse than their counterparts in Cricket.
In this case Tauson was hell wrong. The call did happen after Krejcikova returned the ball. At TH-cam 0.25 slow motion it's very clear.
I suare, i dont understand those Umpires.
They make he Call "" OOOOUUUUT "" loud and clearly....then, they say
"" it didnt affect your shot ""
WHHHHHATTTTT ???
How the hell the umpire stop the game and then say he doesnt have impavt on the playr shot?
are they serious or have some kind of mental disorder
Its like the decision about rainning on Zverev Game !!
ahahahaha
What kind of logic is that ..."" if starts to rain heavier, we stop , wait outside while he covering the court
ahahahahah
oh my Goddddddddd !!!!
ahahahah.
P.S
I´m sorry about my grammar errors, i´m Portuguese
Zverev is so good 😁
🔝🔝🔝
Eeeee🤪🤪🤪🚩🚩🚩🚩
There's not way Khachanov was affected by these calls. Totally correct decision by the umpire in my opinion. These shots were way too fast that the calls could have happened at the same time.
Definitely some UK bias against Russia players, sad to see
What do you mean? Khachanov was wrong the whole time!
Why is tennis literally one of the dumbest sports apart from the game itself