Basically 100% Siberian but because there is not a separate category of Siberian on MH, person is a combination of many ethnicities that wear this kind of dna. Very nice results of Evenki people👍👌
You do a very good job Decimali, you are the rare one who made a lot of videos on genetics of indigenous Siberian people, i would like to see some other groups like those from Far Eastern Russia Nanai/Negidal/Ulchi, I totally expect their results gonna be different than that we seen among Hezhen who scored highest “Mongolian” ever (Mongolian on myheritage is results of mix between ANA Amur river+East Asia Yellow river like ancestries), unlike Hezhen who got the Yellow river component from recent mixing with Han Chineses, Nanais/Negidals/Ulchi are of pure stock ANA ancestry (I remember ANA Devil gate results instead of super high Mongolian it scored Japanese+CA+Inuit which surprised me, but I guess it because of lack of Yellow river like component it didn’t scored any “Mongolian”). I would love to see that those groups mentioned above would obtain on MH, it will also help to understand better MH algorithms👍🏼
Remember the proto Uralic DNA guys? These results are close to it, both scored high Central Asia although having 100%east eurasian DNA. Mongolian score was low because My heritage Mongolian is East Asian/Yellow river shifted so Siberian groups don’t score much of it
@@fachospheriquemotors Oklm tkt. Ta un peu raison sur les derniers 4(modern) ya que des peuples asiat/sibérien amerindien mais les ancient au moins les 6 derniers à partir des yamnaya c tous des aryens
Kennewick Man: mitochondrial haplogroup X2a and the Y-chromosome haplogroup Q-M3. What group in Siberia would this man's ancestors have originated? Kennewick Man was found in the Pacific northwest of the USA (Columbia river basin)
@@gloriabutler2101Ya'et'eh I'm 1 💯% native american apache from arizona I scored q haplogroup and x haplogroup like kennewick man he is 1 💯% native american of north america and he originates in north america we 0% asians and 100% q haplogroup frequency is what my frequency is it's from north america and if you the q haplogroup you descend from native americans from Alaska thru Chile same goes with 100% x haplogroup it's from north america
Reminder, Myheritage dna data dosen't have "Siberian" DNA or classify "Siberian" as a single group. Every Siberian should have different amounts of DNA (Central Asian, Mongol, Inuit, Korean etc..). So don't turkify this Even.
Central Asia has indeed Western Eurasian DNA too but historically the area became more Eastern Eurasian due to Turkic and Mongolic migrations and Genghis Khan's and Timur's massacres.@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat
@@barguttobed Yes. And also many similarities between Nivkh language and those from the Japanese archipelago. These smaller tribes have deep roots in Asia
Very interesting!!!!! I would like to see the results from indigenous people of Russia like Samoyed people (forest Nenets, Tundra Nenets, Enets, Nganasans, Selkup), Nenets from European side, Nenets from Asian side, Yaran people which are mixed Nenets, Komi, Khanty, Mansi, Komi people (Komi Izhma, Komi Zyryans, Komi Permyaks), Udmurt, Mari, Ket people, Yukaghirs, Dolgans and Yakuts
Nope Evens are more related to Central/East Siberian Nganassan/Krasnoyarsk_BronzeAge/Neolithic_Yakutia_Ymyakhtakh like ancestry rather NorthEast Siberia/Beringian like in Chukchi, Eskimoes, Itelmens. You can see 3:16 populations genetic closeness list there are only Itelmens as Kamchatka populations and they pretty distant 0,149 even Tungusic Far East Nanai and Ulchi are closer to it.
@@armins9118 I don’t think some ANE ancestry even exists among Evens. Check Dodecade 12b populations spreadsheet for Chukchis/Itelmens they tend scoring some North European/Gedrosia which is ANE confusion while in this one 3:04 it totally(almost beside 0,69 Gedrosia) lacks it.
Here's another to add to the list of ppl not connected to black African nations and tribes... this is actually interesting and maybe they should rewirk that theory stating WE ALL CAME FROM black Africans. Ancient Egyptians (nobil mummy dna) Basques East Asians And now these indigenous ppls of Russia 🤔
@Selenge Make no what you say. The ethnogenesis of Yakuts was much later. The other Turkic people leaves much earlier from Siberia to Central Asia. It could be from West Siberian Hunter-Gatherers and Ancient North Eurasian exchange of ancient times. For example I'm Karapapak Terekeme Turk and I'm a sub ethnic group of Azerbaijanian Turks and I have little bit Mesoamerican Andeans as result. This is from Central Asia which immigrated over 15000 years or olde. It was the first wave of immigration to America. Thousands of years later the Siberians become new mutation and new immigration starts over 10.000 years ago to America. That's why Mongolians or other Siberians have Inuit or Native American as result but not Mesoamerican. I saw on some Hungarian, Turkmen Mesoamerican. Ancient Europid Central Asians have mostly Mesoamerican too.
@AlunGo-kr5dg how could they be East Siberian when they literally originated from Manchuria? they migrated to the north in the historical times. You probably confused Evens with Ewenks. Ewenks indeed migrated from Manchuria one-two thousand years ago to East Siberia, and assimilated some local paleo Siberian natives.
@AlunGo-kr5dg also you are talking only about the paternal DNA, while forgetting about maternal DNA which is similar among Northern Han, Mongolian, Tungusic, Koreanic and Yamato and different from Southern Han
Elder C2, K2 of southeast asians were ancestors of ancient northern east asians ANEA having C3, N, O3, P1 haplogroups. These ANEA people were speaking uralic-altaic languages 9k years ago. (Reference: Martine Robbeets / Max Planck Institut) They have separated to different ethnicities as C3 mongolic, tungusic, N uralic, finnic, O3 koreanic, japonic, P1 hunnic, turkic, ugric in different regions. P1 haplogroup hunnic, turkic, ugric people have separated into Q dene-yeniseian, native american and R again hunnic, turkic, ugric people. All R1, R1a, R1b, R2 ydna haplogroups are descendants of central asian turkic people but mixed with J2 M172 persians in central asia and taken maternal phenotypical caucasoid mtdna from indoeuropeans partly.
the Indigenes of this area of the world are very important to the World of Genetics and DNA because they are very Ancient and their genetic markers are found from Scandinavia, South Pacific to South America
![Half White Half Japanese DNA RESULTS!🌍일본미국 혼혈와이프의 [DNA 유전자 검사결과 공개] 🌍アメリカ＋日本ハーフのDNA検査結果-23andme](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/UpSGBlbN64I/mqdefault.jpg)
Basically 100% Siberian but because there is not a separate category of Siberian on MH, person is a combination of many ethnicities that wear this kind of dna. Very nice results of Evenki people👍👌
I have to correct you Dejan, those results belong to Even and not Evenki, both groups are two different ethnicities although being closely related.
@@barguttobed Ok
It's very telling, the map showing the British Isles has 'Ireland' written across it.
You do a very good job Decimali, you are the rare one who made a lot of videos on genetics of indigenous Siberian people, i would like to see some other groups like those from Far Eastern Russia Nanai/Negidal/Ulchi, I totally expect their results gonna be different than that we seen among Hezhen who scored highest “Mongolian” ever (Mongolian on myheritage is results of mix between ANA Amur river+East Asia Yellow river like ancestries), unlike Hezhen who got the Yellow river component from recent mixing with Han Chineses, Nanais/Negidals/Ulchi are of pure stock ANA ancestry (I remember ANA Devil gate results instead of super high Mongolian it scored Japanese+CA+Inuit which surprised me, but I guess it because of lack of Yellow river like component it didn’t scored any “Mongolian”). I would love to see that those groups mentioned above would obtain on MH, it will also help to understand better MH algorithms👍🏼
Bro do you think that Haplo C2 linked with ANA people?
@@kpcakvolkan4733 I think it’s very likely associated with ANA(Ancient Northeast Asian) ancestry beside sorry no ideas
@@barguttobed Thanks for answer. Are you an ethnic Mongol?
@@kpcakvolkan4733 Decimali made the new video, go check comments and you find the answer😂
Remember the proto Uralic DNA guys? These results are close to it, both scored high Central Asia although having 100%east eurasian DNA. Mongolian score was low because My heritage Mongolian is East Asian/Yellow river shifted so Siberian groups don’t score much of it
3:12 Even proto-Uralic(Krasnoyarsk BA) showed as second closest ancient population to this Even, first is Neolithic Yakutian
Encore un turco/chinetok 😂
@@fachospheriquemotors Waa respect les😂
@@barguttobed je blague ma femme est cambodgienne en plus
@@fachospheriquemotors Oklm tkt. Ta un peu raison sur les derniers 4(modern) ya que des peuples asiat/sibérien amerindien mais les ancient au moins les 6 derniers à partir des yamnaya c tous des aryens
Kennewick Man: mitochondrial haplogroup X2a and the Y-chromosome haplogroup Q-M3.
What group in Siberia would this man's ancestors have originated?
Kennewick Man was found in the Pacific northwest of the USA (Columbia river basin)
Turkic and Native American haplogroup
Most concentrated Q it is in north central Asia
@@gloriabutler2101Ya'et'eh I'm 1 💯% native american apache from arizona I scored q haplogroup and x haplogroup like kennewick man he is 1 💯% native american of north america and he originates in north america we 0% asians and 100% q haplogroup frequency is what my frequency is it's from north america and if you the q haplogroup you descend from native americans from Alaska thru Chile same goes with 100% x haplogroup it's from north america
Reminder, Myheritage dna data dosen't have "Siberian" DNA or classify "Siberian" as a single group. Every Siberian should have different amounts of DNA (Central Asian, Mongol, Inuit, Korean etc..). So don't turkify this Even.
Central Asia is half Indo European mix..
Myheritage:40+60% Mongols(Turkic+Tungusic+chines)etnic,from Gedmatch
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat nope
@@RandomGuy-df1oy So why we look different then?
Central Asia has indeed Western Eurasian DNA too but historically the area became more Eastern Eurasian due to Turkic and Mongolic migrations and Genghis Khan's and Timur's massacres.@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat
They're all speakers "Subject + Object + Verbs".
Chinese → "Subject + Verbs + Object"
Na-dene 언어도 그들은 동일합니다
@@land980 Na dene language must be spreader from later wave migration to North America
@@barguttobed Yes. And also many similarities between Nivkh language and those from the Japanese archipelago. These smaller tribes have deep roots in Asia
@@land980 Probably
Cuz Chinese are Sino-Tibeto-Burmam speakers
I watched a lot of these from all over the world and Finnish is everywhere !
I have noticed too ! Can anyone explain why this is ?
Yes Finnish is the main boss on MH 😉
@@nimla My guess is the Sami people; their language being categorized as Uralic.
@@johnjuhasz612 The Finns share their paternal genes with most of the peoples inhabiting Northern Eurasia up to the Chukchi.
Fascinating! I’d love to see a modern day Bangladeshi or a Bengali from the Pala Empire 😊
Hi! Do you happen to have modern Javanese dna from Majapahit maybe?
😂
Very cool video!
North East Asians not Siberian
❤️🇹🇷💙
Very interesting!!!!!
I would like to see the results from indigenous people of Russia like Samoyed people (forest Nenets, Tundra Nenets, Enets, Nganasans, Selkup), Nenets from European side, Nenets from Asian side, Yaran people which are mixed Nenets, Komi, Khanty, Mansi, Komi people (Komi Izhma, Komi Zyryans, Komi Permyaks), Udmurt, Mari, Ket people, Yukaghirs, Dolgans and Yakuts
0:10 High Cheekbones Gang 💪🏼😎
100% Ural-Altaic😂
100% turkic, monggolic and tunguisic like ancient turkic people
@@barguttobed okay nmdc stppe bar ba rian
There aren't Altaic language family
He is very similar to the natives people of Kamchatka and Inuits!
Nope Evens are more related to Central/East Siberian Nganassan/Krasnoyarsk_BronzeAge/Neolithic_Yakutia_Ymyakhtakh like ancestry rather NorthEast Siberia/Beringian like in Chukchi, Eskimoes, Itelmens. You can see 3:16 populations genetic closeness list there are only Itelmens as Kamchatka populations and they pretty distant 0,149 even Tungusic Far East Nanai and Ulchi are closer to it.
They also lack high ANE component which is present among Inuits and Kamchatka natives
@@barguttobed It lacks not, but the amount of ANE is low.
@@barguttobed Inuits and people of Kamchatka are 70% similar to Naganasans.
@@armins9118 I don’t think some ANE ancestry even exists among Evens. Check Dodecade 12b populations spreadsheet for Chukchis/Itelmens they tend scoring some North European/Gedrosia which is ANE confusion while in this one 3:04 it totally(almost beside 0,69 Gedrosia) lacks it.
perfect result
наш Каракалпакский народ по облику вообще похожие люди
вы монголы же
@@aktayturan9272 Это Результат Узбека а не калпака
@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat lol results of kalpak😂 Karakalpak*, Kalpak means hat
@@barguttobed kalpak is hat, i know, they are Mongols
@@azattoremuratov Тимур истреблял кипчаков
Pure Turkic & Tungisic ❤
0% Turk
100% turkic ,monggolic and tunguisic like first turkic
@@MrEVAQ Siberian:100%Turkic
@MongolPatriot mongolians and turkic aren't related
@MongolPatriot you're look like 100% chines
This mtdna and it's subclades are now mostly in Russia
Here's another to add to the list of ppl not connected to black African nations and tribes... this is actually interesting and maybe they should rewirk that theory stating WE ALL CAME FROM black Africans.
Ancient Egyptians (nobil mummy dna)
Basques
East Asians
And now these indigenous ppls of Russia 🤔
İ expected more mongolian iin this result.But İt seems like they close to turkic .
@Selenge Make no what you say. The ethnogenesis of Yakuts was much later. The other Turkic people leaves much earlier from Siberia to Central Asia. It could be from West Siberian Hunter-Gatherers and
Ancient North Eurasian exchange of ancient times. For example I'm Karapapak Terekeme Turk and I'm a sub ethnic group of Azerbaijanian Turks and I have little bit Mesoamerican Andeans as result. This is from Central Asia which immigrated over 15000 years or olde. It was the first wave of immigration to America. Thousands of years later the Siberians become new mutation and new immigration starts over 10.000 years ago to America. That's why Mongolians or other Siberians have Inuit or Native American as result but not Mesoamerican. I saw on some Hungarian, Turkmen Mesoamerican. Ancient Europid Central Asians have mostly Mesoamerican too.
Lol they are closer to other Siberian nations as well Mongols and eastern turkics, but absolutely not close with caucasoids like you
@@aktayturan9272 Mongolians do score Mesoamerican on My heritage😂 You just blind
@@aktayturan9272 Buryat Mongolian results 3,7% Mesoamerican, you score max 0,5%😂😂
th-cam.com/video/inilb_imcvk/w-d-xo.html
@@aktayturan9272 Now you see? I showed you
They indeed look Japanese for me
@AlunGo-kr5dg how could they be East Siberian when they literally originated from Manchuria? they migrated to the north in the historical times. You probably confused Evens with Ewenks. Ewenks indeed migrated from Manchuria one-two thousand years ago to East Siberia, and assimilated some local paleo Siberian natives.
@AlunGo-kr5dg don’t forget that Yellow river farmers and Amur river hunter gatherers were subgroups of one Ancient North East Asian group
@AlunGo-kr5dg also you are talking only about the paternal DNA, while forgetting about maternal DNA which is similar among Northern Han, Mongolian, Tungusic, Koreanic and Yamato and different from Southern Han
No, they don't look Japanese, they more look like Mongolian
@@vaniaaprillia9495They do look like my neighbors in Sapporo
mixed with the Yakuts
Vice versa
No they didn’t
Plz Metei Pangal 😢
Elder C2, K2 of southeast asians were ancestors of ancient northern east asians ANEA having C3, N, O3, P1 haplogroups. These ANEA people were speaking uralic-altaic languages 9k years ago. (Reference: Martine Robbeets / Max Planck Institut)
They have separated to different ethnicities as C3 mongolic, tungusic, N uralic, finnic, O3 koreanic, japonic, P1 hunnic, turkic, ugric in different regions.
P1 haplogroup hunnic, turkic, ugric people have separated into Q dene-yeniseian, native american and R again hunnic, turkic, ugric people.
All R1, R1a, R1b, R2 ydna haplogroups are descendants of central asian turkic people but mixed with J2 M172 persians in central asia and taken maternal phenotypical caucasoid mtdna from indoeuropeans partly.
More Turkic than Anatolian Sarts
Less Turkic than Muğla citizen chads ;)
@@papazataklaattiranimamMore Turkic than greek armenian mix you
Anatolia is not Sart stupid borat
Tungusic people are closer to original Turks than those caucasoids from Anatolia/Azerbaijan
@Selenge Im sure he knows it, just making irony about that real Turkic people closer to Evens than Anatolians.
One of DNA Paraguayan guarani indigenous..
TURKİC
More turkic than u and Turkish people lmao 🤣
@@Alghi451 eat ur rice you papuan javanese sea gypsy😂
you seem to really like these small primitive tribes in siberia no one knows or cares about
At least they have not made a horrible things to others like your "Indo-Europeans", Anglo Saxons and Western World did in general...
@@dejantodorovski5222 we did more good than bad. We civilized the world. Arent you a descendant of indo-Europeans too?
@@RichardEdwards40With the stolen wealth, exploitation and murdered milions of native local people? I do not agree.
@@RichardEdwards40 You civilized shit dude 😂 Civilization came to you from other regions
the Indigenes of this area of the world are very important to the World of Genetics and DNA because they are very Ancient and their genetic markers are found from Scandinavia, South Pacific to South America
we are tired of siberian, mongols dna tests.... we want europe
😂😂
I don't want to see whitey dna test actually😂
Or correctly we want Tarim mummies DNA
yeah there boring. Europeans and western asians will always be more interesting.
Naaahhhh..... Eastern Eurasian supremacy!!!! 💪💪💪