If you want to see this movie without all of the blurred censoring that TH-cam put on this video, as well as with an expansion, go here: th-cam.com/video/jeSxIqAYP4M/w-d-xo.html
@Jeb Bohanan they only blurred the faces of the "scientists". I'm assuming because the "scientists" were ridiculous, and absolutely didn't do any favors to their religion of evolution. But now when I watch it, they're not blurred...
@jesusgavemeaids yes... evolution is just as much a religion as any other. It takes more faith to believe everything came from nothing than to believe in a Creator. It's taught in schools and nothing else is allowed to be taught. Evolutionists defend their stance just as any religious person defends their deity. It's no different than a religion.
For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ. 2 Corinthians 4:2 The eyes of your understanding being enlightened; that ye may know what is the hope of his calling, and what the riches of the glory of his inheritance in the saints,Ephesians 1:18
Mick9 And you will make a good witnessing tool to the science community in showing them that science is the affirmation of God's dominion. Maybe even write a book. I would buy it.📕
My mother and sister have prayed for me to be free from my heroin addiction for a decade and I am finally set free and born again in Christ! Glory to God!!! ✝️🧎🏻♀️
I don’t have a religion, I have a relationship. I don’t have a support system, I’m in the process of finding a church. All I do have is my Faith and my God. All I know is, nothing else worked until I found God.
Amen! And the unfortunate hate believers receive is just more proof of the truth of God. *_"If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you. If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you. Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my saying, they will keep yours also. But all these things will they do unto you for my name's sake, because they know not him that sent me."_* John 15 : 18-21 May God bless!
ForumLight Thank you so much for your kindness and inspiration! I’m truly grateful for your beautiful soul. I will never stop giving the glory to God no matter what. ✝️🧎🏻♀️ God bless you also.
If you're willing can you give what he wrote or books you suggest about his evidence.......I'm not just asking I really mean it.....www.muamuanngaihte24@gmail
@@muamuanngaihte5055 I know of the Principia Mathematica was written by Newton. In that book he wrote that he made the book so that the thinking man might believe in God. Newton also said what a wonderful God to do gravity that way.
@@themilkyway1371The second part is not true. The universal law of gravity is still in effect. The formula still predict how large bodies interact. The no law will ever be overturned as a law by definition is prove to such a degree that all possibilities have be exhausted. There is no way to invalidate a law.
I have a question for all you Adam and Eve believers ... explain pygmy peoples? explain different skin colours? explain why asians have narrow eyes? explain neanderthal fossils? If we're all descended from Adam and Eve why do we have so many different looking races? Hmmm ... could that be adaption, which, of course, is the mechanism that leads to evolution?
Doesnt change the fact that Iranians belief in the false God and will end up in hell. i wish Muslims would convert to Christianity, because we need such strong believers. Because the world already is so wicked.
@ I want you to imagine a speck of Sand compared to the entire universe, what would that speck of sand be in comparison to the universe? nothing right, now imagine that intensified, imagine your life compared to eternity, eternity! So do you want to thrive in this world now or eternity? because I tell you very truly that the second you give your life to CHRIST from then on it will be a eternity of flourishing life that’s what GOD is LIFE, GOD is life if you want life you need GOD Repent( turn away) from your sins and not only believe God but also put all your trust and faith and all in Christ and also believe that He died on the cross for all of our sins and for all of us and rose on the third day to prove He’s the son of God (God in the flesh) and that He has authority over death and all Acts 3:19 Repent, then, and turn to God, so that your sins may be wiped out, that times of refreshing may come from the Lord, Proverbs 3:5 Trust in the LORD with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding;
@ People often think God is trying to take something from you. But it's the opposite. It's all about what he can GIVE to you. This is the greatest love story on earth and I would hate for you to miss out...Just think about it friend.
Prehistoric Proboscidean fools, by their very nature and meaning of the word,"fool", can't figure out anything. However, the "fool" hath said in his heart, there is no God!
@@darkeen42 Lmao. This has *nothing* to do with this section. Get a life or something. At least *try* to act like your coherent. And *No* Marx is *Clearly* Atheist. Maybe *You* Don't want to associate with *Him.*
@@darkeen42 Well *Yes* It originated via Christian and Pre Christian Civilizations of Europe. That Said, No One is Complaining when Christians Are being persecuted unfairly by both the Romans and Jews alike. But when the *Same* Thing Happens to the Jews or what is left of the Pagans if Rome, it's all "No you can't do that!" A Case Double Standards ain't it? In any case *no* I don't condone Anti Semitism in *any* way. But I won't deny that anti semitism was a development ( an unfortunate one at that ) from Christian and Pre Christian Civilizations of Europe. But all of this is assuming that Christianity was the original "cause" for it. While I won't deny that Christianity contributed to it via the phenomenon of anti semitism receiving institutionalization within European Christianity. It has been expressed in Ancient Greece and the Roman Empire, Possibly before Christianity Got Saved by Constantine. So the idea of anti semitism has been in circulation even before Christianity hit it big. And even then, it's unfortunate that Christianity made the prejudice worse. But compared to the Holocaust ( Again, Hitler is *not* a Catholic, not anymore ), we should be glad that those Jews Pre Holocaust didn't suffer worse fates then... Well the Holocaust. That said: *Why* are we discussing this *here!* Come on! At least *try* to act Mature. Let alone Coherent.
You did mentioned something very true: PEOPLE ARE SO INTO LIVING A SINFUL & EARTHLY LIFE STYLE, they don’t want to leave it , so they AVOID EVERYTHING ABOUT GOD’S TRUTH ! Period.
Let's put gods truth to the test . Can this crap show of a universe be repeated . Does a kind mean species. Does god know more than you. Does god change. Does Ray understand science. Let's keep the education the bible has to offer humanity on that same shelf, reserved for fariy tales and magically caused events, such as the illusion of Ray Comfort being a wise man. Take a better look at your intellectual designer and the design. See the flaws.
@@krazylevin Why would it be too late for so many people or because they don't believe the same way you do. Mind you there are cultures much much older than Christianity and Muslim and Hindi and yet they don't seem to be credited with being the original knowledge of what God's mind is like
@@kijul468 dipende da cosa intendi con evoluzione. Se ti riferisci all’adattamento allora sì, ma se si parla di macroevoluzione, questa non è mai stata provata ma semplicemente dedotta. Ci sono un sacco di pezzi mancanti che non sono mai stati trovati perché non sono mai esistiti. Nessuna specie si è mai letteralmente evoluta in un’altra. E la realtà lo testimonia.
I remember reading the Bible one of my first times as a new believer. There was a list of does and donts and I realized I was doing a lot of the donts. I didn’t read my Bible for at least two weeks after that. I felt like I could never live up to that standard. The Holy Spirit was still with me tho and convicted me to press on with my studies. 7 years later and I’ve grown so much in Christ ♥️ granted I’ve still got more growing to do but God will finish what He started in me ❤️ It is hard to admit we are sinners and need to be reborn, but it’s so worth it. Thank you Jesus
@@drea8024 Drea, God sent his son as a substitute for yours and my sins. Satan is a liar, of course thats how you will "FEEL" because the liar whispers lies unto you. God "WHISPERS" truths unto you from the bible. Go read Luke 4, how did Jesus overcome the devils lies? So, when Satan asked him to cast himself down from on high, Jesus simply said, It is WRITTEN, thou shall not tempt the Lord thy God. When Satan offered him all the kingdoms of the world o-if he would only follow him, Jesus simply said, "Thou shalt worship the Lord they God only, etc. etc. Read the word. Stay out of THE WORLD. God Bless
@@drea8024 Even Paul said that the things he does, he doesn’t want to do….salvation doesn’t mean you will not sin. When you do sin you have an advocate. I spent 20 years after salvation not thinking I was saved bc I wasnt changing as much as I thought I should. Just let God transform you day to day. Google the promises of God and read them every day.
@Edward The Booble you are evidence that there has to be God, cuz I dont know where in the world you Love, sense of Justice, morals especially Morals and conscience come from unless love evolved too 😅😅😅😅😅
Do you know that the bible tells us how God created us and it was not with a bang or BOOM. Just search Genesis 1 And then read chapter 1 and Chapter 2.
That’s because they are likely hard hearted. They have probably heard the gospel before, and the Holy Spirit convicts the world of sin and judgment, but they probably resisted all the way to that age. There seems to be a point where God lets go, because when you say no the first time, it becomes easier to say no again. But of course we should pray for them.
God is never changing . Mankind does though. GOD says these things are evil and Ya'll don't like what HE SAYS so you try to change people's minds with your carnal way of thinking. Do you think GODS mind will be changed when you stand before HIM! And you will stand before HIM! Who are you to rail against the ALMIGHTY GOD! For unbelievers there will be wailing and gnashing of teeth.
Yes sure, covid 19, Ebola, malaria, dengue, bubonic plague, earth quakes, floods, droughts, famines which kill millions of innocent men, women, children and innocent unborn in mothers wombs, YES for sure I can see thhe lovely god around me with his wonderful creation. Only the blind and thhe brainwashed cant see, on what an irony!!!
@@bdmiller1204 prove Satan exist! If you make claims then you must prove it and do it. The burden of proof is on you now! We are waiting for your proof. Then prove God and prove Jesus is the Son of God too. Over to you the delusionals
@@bdmiller1204 It is just collection of fictions written by men. It does not prove anything. Then prove the Bible is true! I also have lots of books that claim to be true!
I love the extremely thoughtful way Ray evokes our God-reflected intelligence :) I was an agnostic for 27 years, and it brought me nothing but despair, suicidality, and existential dread. When Ray spoke of his life changing overnight, I can absolutely attest to that. Christianity has given me peace, understanding, and purpose. I started pursuing it with the idea of, 'Even if it's not real, what harm can it do?' I didn't quite expect to be so wholly changed, but I no longer have an excuse to doubt. People love their sin, and they also, like me, might feel that they couldn't possibly be accepted by God because of their inability to understand or logically reason it. But if you take the Bible at face value, with honest objectivity, it offers the most logical moral argument for human existence and creation than any other book I've had the pleasure of reading. “Christianity, if false, is of no importance, and if true, of infinite importance, the only thing it cannot be is moderately important.” ― C.S. Lewis Better safe than sinning, I say. :) and as Ray has said, 'Fear is your friend.' It's that innate sense of value God placed on each and every one of us that keeps us alive. We need to value our eternity just as much as our immediate, observable life. I love you, reader. I hope you will search for the greatest Love and Peace ever known.
@@alexabbitt6135 No. As an Agnostic I know that he is not going evidence or reason which is what Agnostics do. He chose to give on reality and join a religion that makes promises based on nothing but whatever it takes to con the gullible.
@@frostymcfang4656 What can you expect from a guy that called himself an Atheist because he was angry at his god? C. S Lewis was not rational where his religion was involved.
@@Demiligne of course. I also understand when quantum scientists tell us the universe doesn't really exist. Only problem is that I can see that it does. And I can see that we're not fish.
@@Demiligne because they think everything evolved from the ocean. Also, our atmosphere is liquid like compared to the atmosphere of other planets... plus some people are as dumb as fish and swim in schools.
@Jahmed Music I have one point that I think is a solid argument that crumbles the christian doctrine, admitably it does hinge on the modern scientific understanding evolution being true. But for the sake of the logic, stick with me. Evolution requires death to happen, species cannot evolve unless the "unfit" organism die out. the bible claim that sin is the source of death "the wages of sin is death". Before humans could have sined they must have existed. If humans came from evolution( which I acknowledge you probably don think is true) then sin could not be the cause of death and the doctrine of original sin, a cornerstone of Christianity, falls. I bring this up because for a long time I believed that evolution was guided by the christian God. When I came to resize that was logically impossible, that was one of the major causes of me giving up my belief in God.
@@BearcatSandor Where did you pull that from? They come up with theories that they often pass off as truth such as evolution. The laws of physics and science were established by the creator...Yehovah.
I dont believe in a man in the sky.. Seriously? A being with unfathomable power, Controls time, the complex design of every cell and of animals. The very universe itself is no accident. As wise i am, i gave up thinking for myself. I surrendered because God's method is way way superior than my own that i could ever come up with Well whatever. Everyone will face God and be reminded how he manifested and called on us many times i feel like
Be Free, Die Trying: Jesus died for you so He wouldn't have to live without you. You are on your Way, buddy! Study Scripture daily, and pray to God or Jesus before you open your Bible, asking Them to send The Holy Spirit to enlighten your heart and mind about what you're preparing to read. My recommendation is this: Read the five chapters of 1st John (that's the 1st epistle of John, not the Gospel of John) over and over until you know you know it. Then begin to study the rest of The Bible. 1st John 1-5 is the perfect overview of the entire message of The Bible.
You call God the fool then, what this man quoted were not his own words. "The way of a fool is right in his own eyes: but he that hearkeneth unto counsel is wise." Proverbs 12:15 KJV. My counsel is this, read the 4 gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) and if you've never done so try to pray before reading (It's like talking to a friend). If by those end of those books your eyes have yet to be opened, you can then say at the very least the book has been.
rgsand01 you only have to look into the infinite sky . Day or night. That's infinity. Or you can think that almost every human society throughout time has had a firm belief in God because they were all not as smart as you. Atheists know there is God. It's in us all. Don't hide it. Let it come out. Can't hurt.
Do you feel strong ? how long do you think that strength will last you if you do ? This isn't about church or religion, it's about you, to try to tell people that HAVE EXPERIENCED GOD is like trying to disprove air. THAT is foolishness, what separates the believer and non believer is not just faith, but experience. I personally did not believe matter of fact i said that i hated God because he'd done nothing for me. Took 5 years after that to come to terms that i'm nothing and nobody and that we're all on the same ride to somewhere. You're not a humble person that i can tell, and i'm not judging i'm observing. So one day when life's just a bit too hard you'll call on God.....and mark my words you will. You will be changed, specifically that hard heart of yours. I say this from experience i used to be you, making fun of the believers and existing my way through life miserably. You may be riding that non believing high horse of yours but trust me when i tell you. You will fall off one day, see who comes to help.
@@tracyharyklia8883 , when Jesus was crufied 2000 years ago, there were people who seen it and wrote the story. 2000 years ago people were well versed in written langauge und literature. 65 millions ago there no human beings on earth who would have recorded the histroy thats the different.
skuggkungen Maybe if he didn’t create satan, Eve wouldn’t have been tempted to eat from the tree 🤷♂️. The whole sacrifice seems pointless, is it really sacrifice if he gets it back in 3 days?
I like seeing the comparison between different ages of people. Typically you would think that the younger people are immature and close minded, but it’s clear here that the older “professionals” have no intention of thinking about these things, whereas the younger people are very polite and open minded (most of the time, haha)
I have a question for all you Adam and Eve believers ... explain pygmy peoples? explain different skin colours? explain why asians have narrow eyes? explain neanderthal fossils? If we're all descended from Adam and Eve why do we have so many different looking races? Hmmm ... could that be adaption, which, of course, is the mechanism that leads to evolution?
21:26 Who makes the rules? "We do" That says it all Proverbs 1:7 "The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge; fools despise wisdom and INSTRUCTION."
@@ambrosebussey4672 Prove the Bible is false. If you cannot prove the Bible is false then you are going by faith, and you are more gullible then a toddler.
Really? did you decide to be born?. Did you decide that sometime in the next week or so you will drink liquid or you will die?. The rules humans make are social/political/economic etc rules. All this anthroposphere ( human social world) is underpinned by natural laws.e.g. Physics and biology (inc evolution).
@evo: Yes humans make "rules" Duh, BUT humans can't create squat like your creative, magic lighting bolts into the primordial swamp evolution! / religion! & Why not? Not even a simple life form. Doh. but don't let that discourage you! BUT having Godless government enforced your silly faith base mother Gaia Evolution religion on us the living is shameful !
Hello ray, iam parimala, science student from India but i need to defend my faith, I watched almost all your videos, and I want the evidence bible but i can't afford it from India. But i want i, Iam praying God for that bible will be available to me
Hello. I pray that you get a Bible. If there are those professing Christians who claim "God used common descent evolution [because of science]" ask them if they believe that Jesus Christ rose from the dead. They'll say yes. Then point out it IS reproducible scientific fact when a person dies and body grows room temperature they're not coming back. So the resurrection IS contrary to science, yet we believe God anyway. So why throw out other things God makes clear over a common descent belief which is contrary to science. It shows that science is not the issue - but being embarrassed to believe God over what unsaved mankind says.
Science is about the repeatable portion of reality, not things like common descent evolution that contradict repeatable reality, can only be believed in, and they call reasons to believe in it 'evidence'. The bottom line is the topic of the origin of all biological diversity is beyond the scope of science as beliefs, and reasons to believe in it, are all anyone can bring to the table. Here's what *is* science: A.k.a., well documented and published even in evolutionists' own papers (when they happen to include something that's actually observable, repeatable, verifiable biological, scientific fact when they're telling their common descent stories and why they believe in it) that demonstrates common descent from a first life form is anti-science. Science shows that it's observable, repeatable, verifiable scientific fact that, no matter how many generations go by, no matter how much "change in genetic composition during successive generations", no matter how much "change in allele frequencies", no matter how much "development of new species", no matter how much "natural selection acting on genetic variation among individuaIs", no matter how much "adaptation", no matter how much "mutation", no matter how much "speciation", no matter how much "migration", no matter how much "genetic drift", no matter how much "insert other claims here" no matter how many generations go by, ALL populations of: fish remain fish amphibians remain amphibians, canines remain canines, felines remain felines, reptiles remain reptiles, birds remain birds, viruses remain viruses, animals that never had lungs to breath air do not evolve lungs animals that never had hearts to pump blood do not evolve hearts animals that never had eyes to see do not evolve eyes animals that never had brains do not evolve brains animals that never had mouths do not evolve mouths living things that never had a reproductive system do not evolve a reproductive system animals that never had (insert organ here) remain living things without that organ, and so on. There are many more such groups. Science shows that the "common descent from a first life form" evolution (some call Darwinian evolution, some call theory of common descent) is anti-science. Evolutionist can never address these facts - many unfortunately just fall back on ad hominem, showing how they're seem to be really about deception that's contrary to actual science. ===== Part TWO ===== Here are a few objections/claims they may bring up when they cannot address the above observable, repeatable and verifiable facts: *Evolutionists sometimes try to claim you're against science.* Science is fine and requires no belief. In the entire existence of the human race: Objects drop to the ground. Observable, repeatable, verifiable, no belief required. In the entire existence of the human race: Diseases spread. Observable, repeatable, verifiable, no belief required. In the entire existence of the human race: All populations of: canines remain canines, fish remain fish, reptiles remain reptiles, animals that never had hearts do not evolve hearts, animals that never had digestive systems do not evolve digestive systems (or brains, or eyes, or reproductive systems and many, many more cases like these). Observable, repeatable, verifiable, no belief required. *Evolutionists sometimes try to say they don't claim that populations of 'animals turn into other animals' over generations* Quite the opposite. Evolutionists claim the first life form was a single cell. They claim that it is the ancestor of all living things today. That's "animals turning into other animal" over generations of mythological proportions. They claim humans, apes, rats, banana plants (50% DNA similarity to human beings) are all related - that's again "species turning into other species" of mythological proportions, claiming all life is related. At some point reptiles did not exist in their worldview. That means they cIaim over generations some populations animals that were never reptiles 'evolved' over generations eventually into reptiles - That's "animals turning into other animals" over generations to mythological degrees. At some point no animals had brains. This means they claim over generations some populations of animals that never had brains 'evolved' brains over generations. Yet when called out on this some evolutionists even try to say "evolution doesn't say species turn into other species", which again is just not honest. It shows they not only know they're wrong, but they show their intent to push this falsehood anyway. *If you point out evolutionists "populations over generations" claims, and some will dishonestly pretend you're claiming evolutionists are saying that one kind of animal 'gives birth' to another kind".* Which again is clearly deception. Science shows *populations over generations* do not do what they claim. *Evolutionists typically imply making up reasons to believe in their common descent from a first life form belief system is the same as "observing" it,* which of course is false and is just circular reasoning. Making up beliefs ABOUT fossils or ABOUT DNA *that never happens* does not then make fossils or DNA 'evidence' or an 'observation of' of the belief you just made up about them. *Evolutionists also typically resort to the crime analogy.* For example, since you cannot "observe" a certain crime, but can look at "evidence" for a crime, that shows we can know things happened without observing it. But what they ignore: the thing called a "crime" is already observable, repeatable, verifiable reality, so now we can look for forensic 'evidence' of some *MORE* possible crimes that no one is left alive to have observed it. By sharp contrast, what evolutionists do would be the same as giving 'evidence' for some strange new crime that's never been observed even once by the human race, and yet claim that's also an observation of this crime that never happens actually happening (for example: a "crime" of turning someone into a tree). *Even some people factually observing something that's never happened is not science if it's not repeatable and also verifiable.* So for example, hundreds of people are witness to the fact Jesus Christ rose from the dead (or that He raised others from death), and they wrote about it. Direct observation. But it's still not science because it's *not repeatable* and not *verifiable.* There's also evidence He rose from the dead, and some have observed Him alive after the fact, but it's STILL not science that people can be raised from the dead, in spite of evidence, and in spite of it also being directly observed - because it's not *repeatable* and not *verifiable.* And so it goes with the belief of common descent from a first life form - not only is it not *repeatable,* not *verifiable,* it's not even *observable* either - which makes the resurrection far more likely to be called science before the belief of common descent from a first life form ever could. But neither of them can be called science of course. ===== Part Three ===== *Evolutionists almost always are against Christ but are teaching their religion* that goes along with their belief of common descent from a first life form - the belief of 'nothing did it - it all just happened on it's own, including life - you're just another animal related to all animals - so live how you want and you'll rest in peace when you die". But they also pass this religion off 'you are god' off as science as well. That in mind, I implore people to re-read the gospels and forget what any church or any religion or anyone has claimed they say and sincerely consider yet again for ourselves. Judgment is coming for us all for our lifetime of sinning AND refusing God's offer to forgive and forget in the person of Jesus Christ. But religions also twist God's truth to make people think it's their religion and system of rules that makes them right with God when it's about a person: Jesus Christ, and choosing to have a relationship with Him, having a change of mind about living for ourselves and turning back towards God/ Jesus Christ to live for Him instead. John 3 : 14-21 *_"[Jesus said] And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up [i.e., on the cross]: That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life. For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved [exposed]. But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God."_* Live forever, friends!
I have a question for all you Adam and Eve believers ... explain pygmy peoples? explain different skin colours? explain why asians have narrow eyes? explain neanderthal fossils? If we're all descended from Adam and Eve why do we have so many different looking races? Hmmm ... could that be adaption, which, of course, is the mechanism that leads to evolution?
1 Corinthians 1 (WEB) - 1ይ ቆረንቶስ 20: Where is the wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the lawyer of this world? Hasn't God made foolish the wisdom of this world? 21: For seeing that in the wisdom of God, the world through its wisdom didn't know God, it was God's good pleasure through the foolishness of the preaching to save those who believe. 22: For Jews ask for signs, Greeks seek after wisdom, 23: but we preach Christ crucified; a stumbling block to Jews, and foolishness to Greeks, 24: but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ is the power of God and the wisdom of God.
This video makes my heart break for these people who are so clearly being deceived by this world. 10:20 through 13:42 is all you need to watch here to see that this community has no more definitive answer for the miracle of life than we do as believers. The major difference in these two belief systems is directly correlated to the level of pride we have in our own understanding of this universe. I was an agnostic/borderline atheist for the first 23 years of my life until I finally humbled myself and began to see the truth that there is indeed an intelligent being far beyond the capacity of our own comprehension as mere human beings. John 9:39 “Then Jesus told him, "I entered this world to render judgment--to give sight to the blind and to show those who think they see that they are blind."
tim rose I’m truly sorry that you feel this way but Christians have no reason to be “dishonest” when it comes to evangelism. What benefit would it bring to us whether or not you choose to believe in God? Ray is only seeking to spread the truth to people so they may be saved and brought into eternal life. Evolution is an extremely flawed theory and that is becoming more and more evident today through science itself. I suggest you check out the interview with biochemist Michael Behe on the new science about DNA that challenges evolution (Darwin Devolves)
Dave Littleton Michael Behe is not considered a reliable source. Watch his dismissal as a creationist during the Dover trials than outlawed intelligent design as religion. Yes, Ray is a charlatan and ridiculed as the banana man. His editing and stupidity of his questions was laughable. There is no such thing as a kind!
tim rose you say he is “not considered” a reliable source, and yet what does that really mean? He is not considered reliable by whose standard? The evolutionist community? Well of course he isn’t because his research refutes everything that they stand for and believe in when it comes to the origin of life. It is actually laughable to me how arrogant a person must be to claim that their worldview around evolution is superior to that of intelligent design. Scientists don’t even have a clue what 95% of our universe truly consists of (aka dark energy and dark matter) but we somehow think it’s reasonable to entirely rule out the possibility of a divine creator. Believe what you may my friend, but I pray that one day you might let go of your pride just as I did so God can reveal himself to you
Real World Games how do you know they are false? They couldn’t even answer a question that is necessary to evolution. He said something like how come fish aren’t not fish anymore or something like that.
@@debbiemartin2026 How am I supposed to know? There is no direction to the process of evolution besides survival. Besides which we have increasing levels of control of our genes. Which takes us out the loop or at least should do so. It it doesn't it will be because we killed ourselves.
@@debbiemartin2026 So a false claim you made up refutes evolution. No. If you mean humans, its not breaking down. Natural selection removes bad changes. Creationists never deal with the whole process. Just a bit at a time to say it cannot happen because, they know what they are talking about. By the way Jeanson, the guy pushing that, lied to you. He pretends that natural selection does not exist, just like you. Oh post did not show except in the notification. Likely the same for this, but I will check and break things down.
2:11 "it makes more sense than any religion" ok so you are telling me that Fish + time = Human? it's less logical than God + magical powers = everything
@@abigailm.7196 have you even seen how evolution works? Why do most animals have the same bone structure? Why are we slowly loosing our molars? Because we don’t need them and we had them in a time where our ancestors used them. It’s not blindly believing if the evidence is there and yes we don’t know all about the world and that’s why we are still learning but simply believing in a being that created everything and knows everything you do or think is blindly believing Lol she took away her reply
It is science. We can observe evolution through evidence. Bacteria speciation is proof of descent with modified, it is observable even within a human lifetime.
@Jaren Groves can you first define what a kind is? Is it a species? A kingdom? Genus? What is it? Nobody seems to know what kind means, probably because it is meant to be vague.
@Jaren Groves no that is not specific enough because a cat and a dog are in the same kingdom, while a toad and a chicken are in different kingdoms (amphibians and birds). You are going to have to be more specific than that.
@Jaren Groves okay so I'll assume you mean a kingdom. I change of kingdom or "kind" is not possible. All birds share a common ancestor from reptiles, in fact this fossil was named Archaeopteryx. So if you observe it's bone structure, it is similar to the reptiles of that time period (millions of years ago) but also shows characteristics of modern birds, (ie. Feathers, extremely light bones, and primitive wing appendages.) It is safe to conclude that based on the genotyping/phenotyping of this dinosaur, that this represents prehistoric reptiles diverging into what we recognize to today as birds. Even today, we know that birds diverged from reptiles through the use of sequenckng whole genomes of bird/reptile dna and we can see that they are consistently more related than ANY OTHER LIVING ORGANISMS. Hopefully I answered the question? Maybe anti-evolution people should find a better argument against evolution.
To clarify what I said in the beginning, a change of kingdom is not possible, it simply cannot happen in one generation ( or even thousands!) It take millions of years for the divergences to be noticed. Such is the case for birds and reptiles.
What has this plant become? A new plant. Understandable. There's so much variety. Just because bacteria are all microscopic doesn't make them all one kind lmao. Lazy arguing
@@surrealcereal948 You can't expect someone to officially proclaim it as an evidence unless proven unanimously, that's why in every research project there's aways an hypothesis that may or may not answer the theories. And so basically to correct your ideas, a theory is considered a prediction, or an inferred statement to be exact. It could either be supported or denied that's why it's STILL a theory today due to what professional scientists may call it "The Missing Link". Though mostly, researchers are always been so bias with their research just to prove a point that's not there. Take it from me to be exact, a researcher working on robotics. The theory of evolution had always been so bias during it's rise due to many "explorers" that considered a random bone or teeth of a mammal as an evidence to the theory just to prove a point and not just intellectual honesty. (Arkell, I.E., 2015 upon her supported statements of "The Nebraska Man") In 1843 for example, Bouch de Perthes found a man made flint-tool and instantly took it as an "evidence" even though he only claimed the tool and not the remained skeletons of a primitive man.
@@surrealcereal948 Genuinely, I did not visit or proclaimed any creation articles. As usual, bias between intellectual honesty and are just there to prove a point. You can't expect a mind of an evolutionist to have a sincere intellectual honesty rather than evolution. (Lew, 2013) Previous Paleontologists discovering the southern ape "lucy" AUTOMATICALLY ASSUMED that she came from an evolutionary timeline between apes and humans and they AUTOMATICALLY PROCLAIMED an hypothesis that she is the "missing link".
May our dear father GOD the 1 and only true God continue to protect and bless you Ray Comfort. Your faith is powerful & much appreciated. Never stop doing GOD'S work. God bless you now&forever.
Oh well maybe he forgot all those poor children suffering from hunger and decease. All of those people that have died from covid too. But he will protect Ray then everything is good. Sure.
Look around trees oceans animals..🤔 thats evidence of creation.. I personally have experienced the unseen supernatural in my own life , so i only will speak for myself , i know , not beLIEve there's a creator That makes no sense ,, ''' demonstrate a creator first '' Hmm . , so by your logic not being able to identify excatly who build what , doesn't mean or prove anything, there are many structures in the world that we aren't sure who built them ? So what does that prove other than you don't know who created them.??
@@shawndamkani6833 Calling it "creation" makes your reasoning circular since you're presupposing a creator. The fact that things exist does not prove they were created; it just shows they have an origin which may or may not be conscious.
@@shawndamkani6833 Exactly, the question is "where did it come from?" And where it came from is not necessarily a creator. A "creator" must be conscious, and we have many examples of rocks being formed by unconscious forces.
Exactly. Ray asks for a change of kind as they always claim, like some populations of fish 'evolving' over generations eventually into amphibians, or some populations of amphibians 'evolving' over generations eventually into reptiles and so on. Or populations of animals that never had (hearts, brains, eyes, digestive systems, reproductive systems and more) 'evolving' such things over generations. They never can. They just cite what only shows yet again what common descent from a first life form evolutionists claim is science is anti-science. The bottom line is the topic of the origin of all biological diversity is beyond the scope of science as beliefs, and reasons to believe in it, are all anyone can bring to the table. Here's what *is* science: A.k.a., well documented and published even in evolutionists' own papers (when they happen to include something that's actually observable, repeatable, verifiable biological, scientific fact when they're telling their common descent stories and why they believe in it) that demonstrates common descent from a first life form is anti-science. Science shows that it's observable, repeatable, verifiable scientific fact that, no matter how many generations go by, no matter how much "change in genetic composition during successive generations", no matter how much "change in allele frequencies", no matter how much "development of new species", no matter how much "natural selection acting on genetic variation among individuals", no matter how much "adaptation", no matter how much "mutation", no matter how much "speciation", no matter how much "migration", no matter how much "genetic drift", no matter how much "insert other claims here" no matter how many generations go by, ALL populations of: fish remain fish amphibians remain amphibians, canines remain canines, felines remain felines, reptiles remain reptiles, birds remain birds, viruses remain viruses, animals that never had lungs to breath air do not evolve lungs animals that never had hearts to pump blood do not evolve hearts animals that never had eyes to see do not evolve eyes animals that never had brains do not evolve brains animals that never had mouths do not evolve mouths living things that never had a reproductive system do not evolve a reproductive system animals that never had (insert organ here) remain living things without that organ, and so on. There are many more such groups. Science shows that the "common descent from a first life form" evolution (some call Darwinian evolution, some call theory of common descent) is anti-science. Evolutionist can never address these facts - many then just fall back on ad hominem, showing how they're really about deception that's contrary to actual science. Evolutionists typically deceive and pretend making up reasons to believe in their common descent from a first life form belief system is the same as "observing" it, which just goes to show how they're just about deception. Evolutionists also typically deceive and try to pretend that since you cannot "observe" a certain crime, but can look at "evidence" for a crime, that shows we can know things happened without observing it. But what they hope no one notices: the thing called a "crime" is observable, repeatable, verifiable reality, so now we can look for forensic 'evidence' of some *more* crimes that no one is around to have observed. What they do is the same as giving 'evidence' for something that's never been observed even once by the human race, and yet claim that's also an observation of this belief that newer happens, which is just more deception. Hundreds, if not thousands, of people are witness to the fact Jesus Christ rose from the dead, along with others being raised from the dead, and they wrote about it. Direct observation. But it's still not science because it's not *repeatable* and not *verifiable.* There's also evidence He rose from the dead, but it's STILL not science that people can be raised from the dead, in spite of evidence, and in spite of it also being directly observed - because it's not *repeatable* and not *verifiable.* And so it goes with the belief of common descent from a first life form - not only is it not *repeatable,* not *verifiable,* it's not even *observable* either - which makes the resurrection far more likely to be called science before the belief of common descent from a first life form ever could. That aside, I implore people to re-read the gospels and forget what any church or any religion or anyone has claimed they say and sincerely consider yet again for ourselves. Judgment is coming for us all for our lifetime of sinning AND refusing God's offer to forgive and forget in the person of Jesus Christ. But religions also twist God's truth to make people think it's their religion and system of rules that makes them right with God when it's about a person: Jesus Christ, and choosing to have a relationship with Him, having a change of mind about living for the world and turning back towards God/ Jesus Christ. John 3 : 14-21 *_"[Jesus said] And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up [i.e., on the cross]: That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life. For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved [exposed]. But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God."_*
+ *ForumLight* *"Science shows that it's observable, repeatable ... no matter how much "adaptation" ... fish remain fish ... etc."* Science cannot show that fish* always remain fish, canines remain canines, or any of that until it observes every single lineage of fish that's ever existed. Can you find a comprehensive study on every fish that's ever existed? Can you show us a scientific study that concludes that fish always remain fish that _doesn't_ base it on the fact that we just haven't observed the opposite yet? Science isn't "We haven't observed this happening, therefore it's _observable, repeatable and verifiable_ that it can't happen.". That's the problem we're having with your comment. You're taking an absence of observation for evidence of absence, despite the other evidence to the positive. Yes, evolution requires some things that would otherwise seem overwhelmingly counter-intuitive, but it's done the heavy lifting to back it up. Science is limited by our level of technology and not what we can directly observe. We can't directly observe the Roman Empire but we know it existed because we can observe what remains of it - ie. records, coins, cities, etc. Likewise, we can't directly observe dinosaurs evolving into chickens, but we can indirectly observe it by looking at what's left - ie. fossils, chicken DNA. This is how science come up with the reasoning behind its conclusions and, when it's done properly, it's as good a reason to believe it as anything else. Here's what *is* science: no matter how many millions of years, no matter how many rocks there are, no matter how quickly they're moving, no matter what shape they are no two rocks will ever attract each other together, no rocks with build themselves into a planetoid, no rock will shape itself into a sphere, no rock will attract other rocks into orbit. That's the sort of logic you're working with. It all seems fine, because it correlates with 99% of observations anyone has ever made. You or I will never see two stone float together or change shape, and they couldn't even make that happen in a lab. Therefore, it's all anti-science. Except none of that holds up given what we know what we do about how planets are formed. Rock attrition can happen by gravity and electrostatic forces, building up to small planetoids and, eventually, full-on planets. We know this through research, and the evidence is strong enough that we can confidently disregard what would otherwise seem like a common sense conclusion. Science can tell us that, for all the hundreds of years of study, it hasn't observed a fish becoming something else. That's some pretty strong evidence that it can't happen, and I think it's what you're getting at, but it's not absolute, because it isn't comprehensive. Of course, the fact that it isn't comprehensive opens the possibility that it _can_ happen and that we just haven't seen it happen. Cue the theory of evolution. It provides a _method_ for how a fish can become something else. It also give us observational evidence of the same process happening on a small scale unobstructed, and it even explains why we couldn't observe anything more substantial in the first place. It, too, is imperfect, but it can be backed-up, and it's the best we've got right now. * a fish in this example being a primitive organism that looked like what we'd call a fish (In fact, these early creatures weren't genetically the same as modern fish. In fact, the biological classification they fall under _would_ remain the same for all its billions of years of descendants, despite the obvious fact that its descendants are physically and genetically distinct from it and their cousins.) Even if someone were to take the time to go through your brick wall of a copy-paste comment, wading against the current of what sounds kinda reasonable in isolation but nevertheless is at odds with all of modern science, you'd just continue posting it on other threads (again). Why bother with that user's response when no one in any other thread is going to see it? All that matters is that I'm right! Flying elephants are a good example of a negative that can be proven without an exhaustive study. We can just look at the anatomy. It's the same with evolution. If you want to disprove it, give us a proof. Look at the elephant's anatomy. There are claims of observing Jesus rise from the dead like there are hundreds of people claim to have witness Bigfoot. Eyewitness testimony is unreliable even when it isn't thousands of years old. _Don't just continue to insist science shows this and that without backing yourself up as if lack of direct observation is enough. It isn't. Science has shown these things to be feasible through other means._
@@bd1zzl3If you want to prove your God exists, you're gonna have to do a helluva lot better than a zinger you think is clever to prove your case. You can call the number 2 'fat' all you want, 1+1 is still gonna equal 2.
Quote-mining doesn't really mean anything when it's out of context. @dominionn09 He might not be able to prove evolution, but that doesn't make it any less of an observable fact that you can easily prove to yourself if you're honest.
@@Arena1999 I believe in evolution and God. I don't believe that all we see, hear, taste and touch are a result of an explosion. If you're honest with yourself, you'll agree
Good video, but it still annoys me that people don't know words. Using "God" as a cuss word is not "taking the Lord's name in vain." Doing something in vain means to do something, knowing it won't accomplish anything. Praying to God to murder your enemies is taking God's name in vain. At least, that's what it meant when it was written. It's only more recently that "in vain" became synonymous with disrespect.
Einstein: "In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me for the support of such views."
Vladimir Mladenov A handwritten missive by Albert Einstein known as the “God letter” fetched almost $3m at auction in 2018. In it Einstein says: “The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive, legends which are nevertheless pretty childish.”
I believe in the divine Creator, but could you please elaborate? I don't think that athiests will be convinced by this statement and I don't quite understand how either.
We actually share 50% of DNA w/ bananas and 97% w/ Chimpanzees. This isn’t disputable, it’s a proven fact. This shows a high possibility of a common ancestor. If creatism is true, then these DNA coding similarities presented by god have got the be the biggest troll ever.
amalia amalia think the saddest part about it from my personal situation is my brother is a PHD Biologist at the best university in the UK, if he can understand these things and make those internal adjustments, he could be a powerful voice for our community.
Solomon King Oftenimes it's hard for family members to receive certain truths from other family members. One option is to show them these types of videos. Another option is to pray that God Jehovah will send anointed laborers across their paths to minister to them.
People always ask questions like "why God made evil", or "why God made hell?". We need to talk all day long to describe why and at the end, nothing will change. But if you truly ask and seek God, something will change.
evil exists because of our free will. talking from rather pessimistic view we are a big experiment to see what creatures with this level of intelligence will do if given the optio to do what ever
@@anewcreation4667 Because some of us are (rightfully) really sick of people believing in the dumbest things imaginable. Sometimes it's pretty scary to see how dumb people truly are. Science is the way to go, not faith.
@@jennypraise4960 I agree, the cameraman cannot understand the evidence that the people are giving him, he does not understand that observable does not have to be (observing a change in specie, that is ridiculous). Observable evidence lead to the logical conclusion. The camera man does not get it and it is sad because the people he is questioning wont be able to answer such dumb questions.
@@AZ-ts1qy I think you missed the point. Evolutionists mock creationists because we believe in an unseen creator and hence our understanding of creation requires faith, yet evolutionists disregard the fact that their understanding of Evolution also requires faith and hence makes it a religion rather than science which needs to be observed. If you have the answers to the questions or a better and solid theory that debunks God, we are all ears
@@Luxefacile Evolution theory is based on observable evidence, unlike religion which is based on one book or Religious Authority only, more like a Clan. I really cannot comprehend how it is a religion, it has a divers collection of observable evidence that makes the scientific theory applicable and therefore possible to conclude. Exactly like the THEORY of gravity. You can see things fall but who says it is gravity, there is absolutely no evidence for it, but mathematics and other indirect observation and understandings. That man in the video omit those conclusion, he is being fallacious in that way, strawman if I am not mistaken. I find that man very dishonest, because of people like this we still have Flat Earthers as well. It is a WordPlay. When we look at a scientific theory, you can basically build up your own and see if it holds the road. It is Logical. There is so much in science that we can observe and REPEAT, UNLIKE Religion. It is like saying Atheism is a Religion or a Philosophy or worldview. They cannot be something because they are just the absence of the other things and thus nothing. I would be glad to continue this conversation and hope I am not being harsh.
Hello. It's so sad that people think common descent from a first cell is real. Ask them to cite a reproducible case of population of living things that never had brains 'evolving' brains over generations. Same for eyes, or ears, or hearts, or lungs, or digestive systems and so much more. They can't because it's contrary to all of science, all of biology and all of reality. Be not deceived, friend. When we face God for a lifetime of lying, stealing, lusting, hating, blaspheming and more, it won't work to say "well how was I supposed to know?". I implore people to re-read the gospels and forget what any religion or church has claimed they say.
what do you mean by evolution? if by evolution you mean adaptation/speciation within each family, nobody hasa problem with this, if you mean common ancestry between families, that is a heavily outdated idea from 19th century western europe that has no basis on reality
I have a question for all you Adam and Eve believers ... explain pygmy peoples? explain different skin colours? explain why asians have narrow eyes? explain neanderthal fossils? If we're all descended from Adam and Eve why do we have so many different looking races? Hmmm ... could that be adaption, which, of course, is the mechanism that leads to evolution?
@@quasimobius Yes,bacteria and multicellular life have a common ancestor(in the first ever cell),that's what evolution means,not things completly changing,but life becoming more complex,changing a little bit over time. Edit:Evolution at least makes sense,unlike creationism,also do you believe in the 6000 year old earth?
Harry ,just Harry how does that make more sense than creation? You can’t observably proof evolution. Evolution is a belief created and accepted by people who simply DON’T want to believe in God.
God created humans with the ability to think and reason, and God expects us to use that gift He has given us. Remember that at its core the goal of reason and logic is to find truth, and Jesus made the bold claim that He is truth (John 14:6), so reason and logic should lead us to Jesus every time.
It would’ve been good if Ray also asked them when asked about the neighbour and dog drowning scenario, if what if it was them in the water drowning, how would they feel if someone saved the dog over them... it’s easy for people to think someone else has less worth, but when it’s them, guaranteed they place a higher value on their life.
Yes I do love dogs and I don't love my neighbors, but I would save my neighbor first and then I will save the dog. First love God then love your neighbor is what the bijbel says (that is the second and is just as important says Jesus), but I live in a bad neighborhood and I hope that my neighbors will think the same way about it if I am drowning. I do know that they love there dog, so they could not be real bad people.
This is what Jesus says in Matthew 22 vers 34-40 34 Hearing that Jesus had silenced the Sadducees, the Pharisees got together. 35 One of them, an expert in the law, tested him with this question: 36 “Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?” 37 Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’[c] 38 This is the first and greatest commandment. 39 And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’[d] 40 All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.” So save your Neighbor first, and after that if you got time left to can do it save the dog.
@Jax Callum " but Ray has convinced me that there may be God. " By pushing nonsense. " what if there was no evolution? " Actual research shows that there is. " What if something else happened instead of big bang and evolution" What if apples were oranges and Ray didn't lie? Oh there might have something that is not quite what BB theory is today but it would have to similar to produce the evidence we have. As for evolution, that is part of reality, how is theory, and natural selection fits the evidence. "but let's not blindly follow everything." Good, right idea, now stop blindly following Ray. I am not going blind, I am going more than ample evidence. Ray just plain lied about the BB, its NOT everything from nothing because there is no such thing as nothing in our universe. Its human concept, not a part of reality. Let me get you started in your journey to reality. How evolution works: First step in the process. Mutations happen - There are many kinds of them from single hit changes to the duplication of entire genomes, the last happens in plants not vertebrates. The most interesting kind is duplication of genes which allows one duplicate to do the old job and the new to change to take on a different job. There is ample evidence that this occurs and this is the main way that information is added to the genome. This can occur much more easily in sexually reproducing organisms due their having two copies of every gene in the first place. Second step in the process, the one Creationist pretend doesn't happen when they claim evolution is only random. Mutations are the raw change in the DNA. Natural selection carves the information from the environment into the DNA. Much like a sculptor carves an shape into the raw mass of rock. Selection is what makes it information in the sense Creationists use. The selection is by the environment. ALL the evidence supports this. Natural Selection - mutations that decrease the chances of reproduction are removed by this. It is inherent in reproduction that a decrease in the rate of successful reproduction due to a gene that isn't doing the job adequately will be lost from the gene pool. This is something that cannot not happen. Some genes INCREASE the rate of successful reproduction. Those are inherently conserved. This selection is by the environment, which also includes other members of the species, no outside intelligence is required for the environment to select out bad mutations or conserve useful mutations. The two steps of the process is all that is needed for evolution to occur. Add in geographical or reproductive isolation and speciation will occur. This is a natural process. No intelligence is needed for it occur. It occurs according to strictly local, both in space and in time, laws of chemistry and reproduction. There is no magic in it. It is as inevitable as hydrogen fusing in the Sun. If there is reproduction and there is variation then there will be evolution. Some books to get you started: Why evolution is true - Jerry A. Coyne THIS BOOK IN PARTICULAR to see just how messy and undesigned the chemistry of life is. Herding Hemingway's Cats: Understanding how Our Genes Work Book by Kat Arney This shows new organs evolving from previous organs. Limbs from fins. Your Inner Fish Book by Neil Shubin Wonderful life : the Burgess Shale and nature of history / Stephen Jay Gould Life on a Young Planet: The First Three Billions Years of Evolution on Earth Andrew H, Knoll Now evolution is a lot simpler to understand that Big Bang cosmology but if you want books on that I have a few for that as well. Wikipedia covers both quite well and has links to more dense information. Ray make his living promoting his religion learning critical thinking will protect you from snowjobs and fact free nonsense like what Ray uses. A Creationist favorite these days is to simply create a false version of how science works and then lie that if you cannot see something happen today then it never happened and their god did it. Wikipedia - Critical thinking Critical thinking is the analysis of facts to form a judgment.[1] The subject is complex, and several different definitions exist, which generally include the rational, skeptical, unbiased analysis, or evaluation of factual evidence. Critical thinking is self-directed, self-disciplined, self-monitored, and self-corrective thinking.[2] It presupposes assent to rigorous standards of excellence and mindful command of their use. It entails effective communication and problem-solving abilities as well as a commitment to overcome native egocentrism[3][4] and sociocentrism. Ethelred Hardrede
@@ethelredhardrede1838 an entire dissertation of “its likely, it’s possible and open to discussion and much debate”. Evolution that claims evidence yet none has been provided. This video thoroughly exposes the absurdity that is evolution. Wikipedia: Uncertainty
@@warrr_machine At least they are willing to consider a different perspective. Unlike most religious people. They fall out with everyone, even those that have a belief in God, but a slightly different take on it. And no one has ever accosted me in the street to drone on about evolution.
@@Demiligne There's reasons as to why it's questioned, I don't know if you've ever read the Bible but it's said that Satan fills people with doubts of God, for all we know, he could have fed Darwin the theory about Evolution without revealing himself to start this whole Evolution vs God argument.
@@tylerscampinghuntingandsur4957 thats the most stupid thing i have ever heard. "Satan was the one who tricked Darwin into coming up with evolution" Was he also the one who planted fossils and was also the one who gave us all the other evidence to support it? You guys seriously come up with the most stupid arguments to back your beliefs
Indeed. The bottom line is the topic of the origin of all biological diversity is beyond the scope of science as beliefs, and reasons to believe in it, are all anyone can bring to the table. Here's what *is* science: A.k.a., well documented and published even in evolutionists' own papers (when they happen to include something that's actually observable, repeatable, verifiable biological, scientific fact when they're telling their common descent stories and why they believe in it) that demonstrates common descent from a first life form is anti-science. Science shows that it's observable, repeatable, verifiable scientific fact that, no matter how many generations go by, no matter how much "change in genetic composition during successive generations", no matter how much "change in allele frequencies", no matter how much "development of new species", no matter how much "natural selection acting on genetic variation among individuals", no matter how much "adaptation", no matter how much "mutation", no matter how much "speciation", no matter how much "migration", no matter how much "genetic drift", no matter how much "insert other claims here" no matter how many generations go by, ALL populations of: fish remain fish amphibians remain amphibians, canines remain canines, felines remain felines, reptiles remain reptiles, birds remain birds, viruses remain viruses, animals that never had lungs to breath air do not evolve lungs animals that never had hearts to pump blood do not evolve hearts animals that never had eyes to see do not evolve eyes animals that never had brains do not evolve brains animals that never had mouths do not evolve mouths living things that never had a reproductive system do not evolve a reproductive system animals that never had (insert organ here) remain living things without that organ, and so on. There are many more such groups. Science shows that the "common descent from a first life form" evolution (some call Darwinian evolution, some call theory of common descent) is anti-science. Evolutionist can never address these facts - many then just fall back on ad hominem, showing how they're really about deception that's contrary to actual science. Evolutionists typically deceive and pretend making up reasons to believe in their common descent from a first life form belief system is the same as "observing" it, which just goes to show how they're just about deception. Evolutionists also typically deceive and try to pretend that since you cannot "observe" a certain crime, but can look at "evidence" for a crime, that shows we can know things happened without observing it. But what they hope no one notices: the thing called a "crime" is observable, repeatable, verifiable reality, so now we can look for forensic 'evidence' of some *more* crimes that no one is around to have observed. What they do is the same as giving 'evidence' for something that's never been observed even once by the human race, and yet claim that's also an observation of this belief that newer happens, which is just more deception. That aside, I implore people to re-read the gospels and forget what any church or any religion or anyone has claimed they say and sincerely consider yet again for ourselves. Judgment is coming for us all for our lifetime of sinning AND refusing God's offer to forgive and forget in the person of Jesus Christ. But religions also twist God's truth to make people think it's their religion and system of rules that makes them right with God when it's about a person: Jesus Christ, and choosing to have a relationship with Him, having a change of mind about living for the world and turning back towards God/ Jesus Christ. John 3 : 14-21 *_"[Jesus said] And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up [i.e., on the cross]: That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life. For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved [exposed]. But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God."_*
@JacksonI mean most of those happened hundreds of years ago. The only one with evidence had one scientist do one experiment, which is dumb as he could have made a mistake or he could have just lied. Look up pictures of watermelons in the renaissance. They have lots more seeds and much less flesh. The reason watermelons look how they do today is because humans specifically bred them for more flesh and less seeds. In fact this can be seen for almost all fruit you see in a supermarket. This isn’t evolution happening naturally, as in the wild having more seeds and less flesh would be an advantage, but it is proof that mutations occur and it is possible for species to evolve. And if this is true, then it makes perfect sense that if an animal has a mutation, such as a distant relative of a giraffe having a slightly longer neck, or a distant relative of a human growing a slightly more intelligent brain, then they will get more food, or become a more attractive mate, and then those traits will pass down and more and more of the population will have longer necks or better brains until the other ones die out because they can’t get enough food. That’s without giving any pictures of fossils or any form of evidence. Evolution is common sense, and that’s why almost everyone that gets information from anywhere except the bible knows that evolution happened.
For the record evolution is a pretty intelligent form of design. I don't how many of your favourite inventors have created things that literally build themselves.
But common descent from a first cell 'evolution' is not - it's contrary to all of biology. It's the belief that populations of living things that never had brains 'evolved' brains into existence over generations. Same for ears, eyes, hearts, etc. They can't cite any of it, which proves this is contrary to all of biology/science.
“If the Good News we preach is hidden behind a veil, it is hidden only from people who are perishing. Satan, who is the god of this world, has blinded the minds of those who don’t believe. They are unable to see the glorious light of the Good News. They don’t understand this message about the glory of Christ, who is the exact likeness of God.” 2 Corinthians 4:3-4 NLT
@@ultraviolet.catastrophe I have evidence of the making of the universe of GOD and do you not see that it is very beautiful very well made if it happened in bigbang theory the world should be very close if there is a beginning then there is an end and if the universe is good someone made it but GOD designed it. and you can imagine the right distances of the stars and planets if we have the ability to think and make paintings so we can design it and that is also how God made the universe if we can design so also of GOD and if in bigbang theory from all its called accident is there an accident the result is not good right why do we have love for ourselves ,we have love for others we have the ability to think and why did you say that the bible is a lie and it is written in the bible that the world is really round and that life is in the blood that things was discovered before they developed the technologies to get out of the earth and that NASA discovered that the earth is round
@@ultraviolet.catastrophe why did the scientists say that the water came from the meteor but why not on another planet why only the earth has it possible that no meteor fell on mars and why our planet is so beautiful and I have discovered billionaire people is preparing for the destruction of the world maybe they are afraid and no one can live in the wrath of God he is very angry with us because we have done many bad things and you are one of them you do not recognize God he is angry because other people do not believe in him and do you know the scientist then who discovered the telescope he believed in God then and life was still peaceful then there were very few bad events and events like hurricanes, wildfires did not continue but now they continue. because God is angry with us now and JESUS is coming for the servants of God and the DEVIL is preparing and the things that God has given him the intellect are attracted by the devil so that they do not recognize God to look at to them that the bible is just fiction so that they make discoveries and the devil does that the scientists that they believe in their intellect the devil does that so they just ignore all the works of GOD in the universe and the devil does this so that he can be with someone in hell so that he can be with them suffer there the devil is not in hell he is here in our world to sow evil the devil is also smart so he can fool you so he can harm you and why do you really want evidence that if there is a God he should show up in the BIBLE so that "blessed are the people who serve me even when they do not see me" and why did you say that the bible is wrong they did noah's ark on mountain ararat in 2012
In case there is anybody still sane looking for a clear answer that has been observed based on fossils collected, it'd be the divergence of the Archaeopteryx. It was an organism with reptile and avian characteristics. It diverged around 150 million years ago to create the family tree of birds, which are considered avians. This divergence in particular is very good because unlike the evolution from the whole Pakicetus to whale stuff, the offspring of the Archaeopteryx had to change much quicker due to hastily altering landscapes. This created an obvious difference in species. In this case of evolution, the annoying interviewer cannot say "but it's still an bird" since the Archaeopteryx was observed to clearly be more dinosaur. Even then, denying the whole Darwin's finch theory was stretching it, Christians. The reason why the finches were "still birds" are because there wasn't a supervolcano eruption that selected offspring that generated scales and were heat resistant. The point I'm getting to is that everything is proof to Darwinian evolution, it's just that everyday change is so small that these awful people have resorted to hiding behind the word "adaptability" (which also proves Darwinian evolution regardless). If there is anybody angrily replying to me that "it was never observed happening, it was so long ago" or "you are just blindly believing what is hypothesized" I have a question; do you have any bones from angels or any observable phenomenon that proves the existence of divine beings, whom ended up creating new species? It might be a silly question, but at this point every question Christians ask are silly.
Hello. Common descent from a single cell evolution is the claim that populations of living things that never had brains 'evolved' brains over generations. Same for eyes, ears, hearts, lungs, digestive systems, reproductive systems and everything else. Ask them to cite any of it. They can't, proving it's contrary to all of biology/science. We're not calling our belief in God science, so we don't need to cite any of it. Evolutionists live by faith, Christians live by faith, but evolutionists are the ones passing off their anti-biology faith as science. Be not deceived. When we face God / Jesus Christ for a lifetime of lying, stealing, lusting, hating and more, having rejected His offer to pay for it Himself on the cross, it won't work for us to say "well how was I supposed to know?" I implore people re-read the gospels, then the rest, and forget what any religion / church has told us they say
I'm a Christian and agree with you. Comfort and YEC blatantly misrepresent the evidence. Hell they don't even understand or it probably wilful in his case the different standards of evidence.
To the answer to the question what you are asking is where is the creator in the creation? Lets say there’s a man who made a computer and then someone comes among and looks in the computer and says where the man “where’s the man who made the computer in here?” You see he’s not He’s outside and it’s the same with God is outside of space time and matter, your not going to find God in this one spot, because He’s outside of that. think about what happened at the beginning of the “big bang” Nothing exploded? If nothing exploded then there isn’t anything to evolve from.
Comfort said that Darwin said 'i have never been an atheist'. QUOTE MINE ALERT!!! Darwin actually said "In my most extreme fluctuations I have never been an atheist in the sense of denying the existence of a God.- I think that generally (& more and more so as I grow older) but not always, that an agnostic would be the most correct description of my state of mind." Darwin was being intellectually honest, he couldn't deny there is a God as he can't prove it, but he is agnostic as there is no reason to believe in God.
@Jnr Burns Do you realize that all of those students from the different studies of science had the same response to a lot of Ray's questions? It seems that you know the answer to all of those questions so do you mind answering the questions that those students couldn't answer? Ray's repeated question is asking for proof and none of the people being interviewed can give it. Isn't it less biased when asking different points of view on science the question? It seems like you're feeling accomplished by making fun of the Christians on here commenting since I've seen quite a few of your responses that seem rude and judging. When trying to prove a point let me tell you that you are less heard when speaking in the manner you are. You might lash out on me for this, but I'm praying for you, whether you want me to or not, whether you believe that God is real or not, whether you hate me or not. I really do hope that you allow Jesus into your heart, and I advise to watch more of Ray's videos to get a better insight if you need an answer to your questions
@Jnr Burns It's funny how you say to keep Christianity out of schools like it's not already happening because people just can't accept it, but will accept other beliefs. Christianity is being silenced by the second whereas everything against it is being promoted. And telling me that I'm pushing my belief onto people is kinda hypocritical, isn't it? I'm pretty sure you know what he meant by kind. A dog is a kind of animal. A cat is a kind of animal. Dog cannot turn into cat. Dog cannot change it's kind. See what I'm getting at? That's what he means by kind. And it seems that you couldn't answer his question, because apparently it makes "no sense" when it's clear as day. And which is not proven that an animal can change it's kind. So I don't understand how you're saying that Christ isn't proven while evolution also isn't. Religion has solved many problems. I'm still young living with my parents and there was a huge issue with my family that I won't get into, but long story short it was horrible and hurtful, leaving me depressed and crying every time I saw them in the same room. Praying to God solved my problem, seeing that my family was getting better. That's not the only situation where God has shown His light to me and fixed my problems. And this is just me, millions of other people had a great experience, and for how many times it's happened, I wouldn't call it a coincidence. I also find it odd how you're asking how religion solves any problems when you're not religious yourself. Just remember that unlike this election, you can't vote when you're dead. When you're being judged, you can't change your mind about Christ anymore. Choose life before death, and life is Jesus Christ.
@@Vic-hc4rr Thanks Morgana for taking the time to write this down. Jnr has shown he was unable to answer any question and used an insult to prove his point.
There is one GOD, the creator of all things. The GOD of Abraham Isaac and Jacob our Heavenly Father and saviour. Seek the LORD Jesus while you still have time. GOD bless you to the way to the truth and eternal life in the holy word of GOD the holy bible.
I see all these people saying they have the answer to the biggest question of mankind, but nobody is offering any evidence. How do you know if there's a God and what evidence is there that your God is the correct God and finally why would God punish me for not accepting him? Is there a valid evidence-based reason you believe in this specific God beyond what is written in a book?
Paul Millbank the LORD Jesus has done many miracles in my life. It dissent matter what I tell you paul, ofcourse there is tones of evidence but as I have spoken to many people like you in the past. Seek and you shall find, the same way I can gather the evidence you can too but you're too lazy. GOD doesn't send you to hell, people choose this place
@@sheriffbang8039 I'm not attacking your belief. I'm also not saying its guaranteed that you can convince me. I am saying if you have evidence I'll listen. Is my lack of belief equivalent to choosing to go to Hell? If it turned out that Zeus was the the correct God and you ended up in Hades would you say you chose that Hell? Don't reply that Zeus isn't the real God this is a hypothetical analogy to get you to understand my position. It's an example of why I reject the idea that I'm sending myself to Hell.
Paul Millbank never said you were bro, doesn't bother me if you do either. I don't need to defend the LORD Jesus he is GOD. GOD said you shall know by their fruits, a tree that doesn't give good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire, im sure you can understand the meaning of that verse, the LORD Jesus says seek and you shall find, for the kingdom of heaven is like a treasure hidden in the field, once you find it you will give up everything to have it. You as a person can tell the difference between evil and good, compare and test all religions, knowledge is power. I have studied Islam myself and know without doubt it is not from GOD. I can tell you that followers of the most high do not follow a thing called religion, it is a faith in the one true living GOD Jesus as he promises us eternal life. None other but him. His words are like no other, his ways are not our ways, for some people live for earthly things, pleasures of the flesh. Promise men many women and you will attract a certain type of Crowd which is the sick and perverse, promise them power on earth and like wise certain people shall come, promise them that they will be gods in the after life and the same, promise them that they will reincarnated into rats and stuff alike and the same certain people will come that proves As we all have different cultures and ideals, though some worship statues, some worship cows, some Mother Nature, some the sun the moon etc you get my point. So now when you study and learn let's say you read the holy bible and in it you find you shall not set up stones in your land and bow down onto them for I AM the LORD your GOD. At the point you need to ask yourself is this is really GOD or man talking, what would man benefit from saying such a thing? Worshiping idols and stuff alike such as the black stone is a mere stone, it is a stone made by man therefore it should benefit man to say such things so that they might sell items for example and have a god like figure that they can see touch. When the one true living GOD of Abraham Isaac and Jacob said not to do such things it proves it is not from man and also proves that GOD of the hoy bible is against all others so called religions. So once you have determined that no other religions have anything to do with the holy word of GOD in the holy bible you have isolated one out of 100. Let's take the teachings and the commandments of the Holy bible and compare them with others to know further if the holy bible is from GOD, the holy bible does not give man power on earth infact it is the opposite and says we will be hated and persecuted suffer a horrible death for his holy names sake the LORD Jesus, we will be mocked killed tortured. Why would anyone want to be a Christian? When you can run off to another religion that promises you power, woman, money etc, the LORD Jesus went further and said love those who persecute you, if Someone comes to Rob you give them your cloak also, pray for those who curse you, forgive and you shall be forgiven that you may be children of your father in Heaven. There is no greater teaching in the world that even comes close to what I just told you, in reality no one wants to do this, people would rather do the opposite, be honest with yourself. How hard is it to love the ones who persecute you or to pray for them. The LORD Jesus fulfilled the law, he did everything he said, when they attacked him, mocked him and tortured him he forgave them, he still loved them and never fought back, like a lamb to the slaughter. That is GOD my friend, there is one GOD and only one way to GOD, it's on the individual to find that path for there is no other way but Jesus. For he alone is the way to the truth and eternal life. Would you follow a man called Mohammad who fondles women on their period claiming he is a prophet and everything he said and did is from Allah, a man called Mohammad who seen in a wet dream an angel of Allah came to him with a photo of Aisha that was 6 years old and he was in his 50s. I can go on forever but I know you get my point. You can believe a cow is god, or a Hindu statue of death called shiva, or a fat kid called Buddha rub his belly and hope for the best. As for me I shall serve the LORD who had done many miracles in my life and I can only invite you to meet him. Sorry if I didnt answer all your questions bro I am at work typing away when I am not meant to haha. Wide is the gate that leads to destruction, narrow is the gate that leads onto eternal life and very few shall find it. Know what is good and believe the good news that GOD loves you bro and you can be saved. He is reaching out to you, you lose nothing and gain eternity to be with the LORD, GOD doesn't ask for money or the keys to your jet ski. Come as you are a sinner and humble yourself before the most high, he the LORD Jesus will lift you up, and plant you on a rock that once you are in his hand no one Can take you out. When a man commits a crime we don't give him a holiday house in Hawaiii and like wise if you commit sin GOD being the Judge of all judges will punish those individuals according to their deeds. GODs ways are not our ways. You're wrong about GOD sending people to hell that have no knowledge of GOD, the LORD Jesus said to the scribes for you say you see your sin remains. Considering I have told you who the LORD Jesus is and you now have the knowledge then your blood is no longer on my hands, it's on yours. The word of GOD shall be preached threwout all the four corners of the earth and take hed no one deceive you for there are many false prophets that come to you in sheeps clothing but inwardly they are ravaging wolves, beware of false Christs my friend for many will tell you look Jesus is over there. Do not go or believe them. Stand true to the LORD Jesus in Faith and the LORD will have his reward with him. If you pray in humility to GOD the father in Jesus name from your heart, I know in mine you will get an answer. Dare to prove me wrong ? I can tell you have a good heart bro. The LORD works in mysterious ways. Do some research on Noah's ark in turkey, and please watch the documentary on sodom. And watch This bro it's a short video th-cam.com/video/3bHAn5i4NiE/w-d-xo.html Blessed is he who believes without seeing
Yes, a person could only make a Rose with supernatural abilities, because there’s no way we could ever have one evolve with our hands, and that’s incredibly silly since that process would take a lot of time and the right selective pressures. Your ‘gotcha’ moment doesn’t work and is incredibly stupid.
Of course a human can't make a rose. That doesn't mean it requires "supernatural abilities." A rose makes a new rose. A human makes a new human. That's how biology works. Not sure how this is a difficult concept.
Don't forget that this film is an edited version of a much larger amount of footage, tailored to make Ray's point, regardless of it's validity. That's no crime, but you might want to keep it in mind as you watch this.
No, common descent from a first life form evolution is completely anti-science. Science is about the repeatable portion of reality, not things like common descent evolution that contradict repeatable reality, can only be believed in, and they call reasons to believe in it 'evidence'. The bottom line is the topic of the origin of all biological diversity is beyond the scope of science as beliefs, and reasons to believe in it, are all anyone can bring to the table. Here's what *is* science: A.k.a., well documented and published even in evolutionists' own papers (when they happen to include something that's actually observable, repeatable, verifiable biological, scientific fact when they're telling their common descent stories and why they believe in it) that demonstrates common descent from a first life form is anti-science. Science shows that it's observable, repeatable, verifiable scientific fact that, no matter how many generations go by, no matter how much "change in genetic composition during successive generations", no matter how much "change in allele frequencies", no matter how much "development of new species", no matter how much "natural selection acting on genetic variation among individuals", no matter how much "adaptation", no matter how much "mutation", no matter how much "speciation", no matter how much "migration", no matter how much "genetic drift", no matter how much "insert other claims here" no matter how many generations go by, ALL populations of: fish remain fish amphibians remain amphibians, canines remain canines, felines remain felines, reptiles remain reptiles, birds remain birds, viruses remain viruses, animals that never had lungs to breath air do not evolve lungs animals that never had hearts to pump blood do not evolve hearts animals that never had eyes to see do not evolve eyes animals that never had brains do not evolve brains animals that never had mouths do not evolve mouths living things that never had a reproductive system do not evolve a reproductive system animals that never had (insert organ here) remain living things without that organ, and so on. There are many more such groups. Science shows that the "common descent from a first life form" evolution (some call Darwinian evolution, some call theory of common descent) is anti-science. Evolutionist can never address these facts - many unfortunately just fall back on ad hominem, showing how they're seem to be really about deception that's contrary to actual science. I implore people to re-read the gospels and forget what any religion, church, denomination claims they say. We'll all face God for a lifetime of lying, stealing, lusting, hating, coveting, blaspheming and more. There are only two religions in the world to address this: Countless versions of "DO this or that and you (might) be saved" and God / Jesus Christ's truth of "It is DONE by Jesus the Christ on the cross and we believe on Him along to be saved - received by faith - and what goes along with it that God does (that shows us our 'faith' is genuine) is we have a change of mind and a change of desires about sin and a new desire to instead follow God.
@@ForumLight Wow, you've spend a lot of time writing that, and you're wrong. Evolutions IS proven well beyond any reasonable doubt. I'm sorry, but you're ignorant of the evidence, or you're not willing to see it. Fossils, genetics, embryonics, lab tests of different kinds and many other independent lines of evidence exist.
@@danielduvana Fossils don't show 'these evolved into populations of those" over generations. It just shows something lived. Evolutionists think if you look at fossils and make up a belief about them that never happens, it nevertheless makes the fossil an "observation" or "evidence" of the belief they made up about them. Anti-science circular reasoning. Same for dna similarity and beliefs they make up ABOUT it. Evolutionist "That's a transitional fossil - and here are reasons I believe it is" "How do you know it is?" Evolutionist "Because common descent from a first life form evolution is true" "How do you know it's true when it never happens?" Evolutionist "Because that's a transitional fossil - and here are reasons I believe it is" (repeat) Evolutionist "DNA similarity and our beliefs about ERV's shows this and that are cousins - and here are reasons I believe it shows that!" "How do you know it does?" Evolutionist "Because common descent from a first life form evolution is true" "How do you know it is true when it never happens?" Evolutionist "Because DNA similarity and our beliefs about ERV's shows this and that are cousins - and here are reasons I believe it shows that!" (repeat) It would be similar to the analogy of someone else making up a brand new (unrelated to evolution) belief like "populations of trees morphed over generations eventually into human beings" and claiming fossilized tree branches and DNA similarity between tree branches and humans are "evidence" or "observations" of it, and it would be just as much of an anti-science farce. If there were initially multiple life forms that led to all life we see today, then large groups of life would in no way be related yet they'd still have some degree of dna similarity, some degree of visible similarity in their fossils, which also shows making assumption about dna similarity or fossils as if it means life is related with a common ancestor is circular reasoning and anti-science. The bottom line is the topic of the origin of all biological diversity is beyond the scope of science as beliefs, and reasons to believe in it, are all anyone can bring to the table.
@@ForumLight You clearly don't have a clue what you're talking about. The fossil records absolutley proves evolution in and of itself, and then there's a bazillion other pieces of evidence. You need to ask yourself why you're resistant to accept evolution? What are your biases? Are you persuing the truth no matter the cost or are you trying to protect your already held beliefs? Evolution is true beyond any reasonable doubt, the evidence is overwhelming. The only way to not accept it is to be ignorant or to be resistant to the truth. Btw, accepting evolution is not a problem for religion. Lots of christians understand that evolution is true and is fine with that. Please take a course in evolution or something.
@@danielduvana _"The fossil records absolutley proves evolution in and of itself"_ False. Looking at two fossils does not "prove" "populations of these 'evolved' over generations eventually into populations of those" except in the minds of evolutionists and why they insist we throw out all of science and biology to believe them instead.
For some there is a scripture, "thinking themselves wise in their own eyes they become fools." One can''t change or help a fool unless the person wakes up to reality and their ego gets deflated enough to recognize reality and truth. In the meanwhile pray for them. We can bind the Satanic demonic spirits from controlling them and loose/intercede for God to intervene. We have no control over any human, such is evil, however we have Jesus authority and should use it to set people free.
Reasoning is not necessary, just thinking you are right and others that disagree are your enemies and hate mongers and right wing extremists, etc. Saul Alinski trained many well to defy God and authority and create chaos. The bad thing is they think they are in control while they are being controlled by demons, hate, selfishness, lust for power and control over others --- all while not recognizing they are the problem because of their convoluted/warped/egocentric/non-sensical thinking.
@@dogelife7901 Can you provide actual evidence of this and (more importantly) evidence that Jesus was the son of God and performed his purported miracles?
Dino Hall you can’t even argue that Jesus wasn’t real even evolutionists know he’s real. And everyone knows he did thos things but the argument is whether or not he was driving out the demons of the people because we was the leader of the demons, or because he had the Holy Spirit in him
Any one of these phds could put him in his place by asking him what is a kind? There is no classification biological classification which is called kind.
What you call it doesn't matter. Common descent evolutionists claim in the past the first amphibians evolved over generations from some populations of fish. That's contrary to science. Common descent evolutionists claim in the past the first reptiles evolved over generations from some populations of amphibians. That's contrary to science. Common descent evolutionists claim in the past the first mammals evolved over generations from some populations of reptiles. That's contrary to science. Common descent evolutionists claim in the past the first living things with lungs (or eyes, or ears, or hearts, or brains, or reproductive system and so much more) evolved over generations from some populations of living things that never had such thing. That's contrary to science.
Science is about the repeatable portion of reality, not things like common descent evolution that contradict repeatable reality, can only be believed in, and they call reasons to believe in it 'evidence'. The bottom line is the topic of the origin of all biological diversity is beyond the scope of science as beliefs, and reasons to believe in it, are all anyone can bring to the table. Here's what *is* science: A.k.a., well documented and published even in evolutionists' own papers (when they happen to include something that's actually observable, repeatable, verifiable biological, scientific fact when they're telling their common descent stories and why they believe in it) that demonstrates common descent from a first life form is anti-science. Science shows that it's observable, repeatable, verifiable scientific fact that, no matter how many generations go by, no matter how much "change in genetic composition during successive generations", no matter how much "change in allele frequencies", no matter how much "development of new species", no matter how much "natural selection acting on genetic variation among individuals", no matter how much "adaptation", no matter how much "mutation", no matter how much "speciation", no matter how much "migration", no matter how much "genetic drift", no matter how much "insert other claims here" no matter how many generations go by, ALL populations of: fish remain fish amphibians remain amphibians, canines remain canines, felines remain felines, reptiles remain reptiles, birds remain birds, viruses remain viruses, animals that never had lungs to breath air do not evolve lungs animals that never had hearts to pump blood do not evolve hearts animals that never had eyes to see do not evolve eyes animals that never had brains do not evolve brains animals that never had mouths do not evolve mouths living things that never had a reproductive system do not evolve a reproductive system animals that never had (insert organ here) remain living things without that organ, and so on. There are many more such groups. Science shows that the "common descent from a first life form" evolution (some call Darwinian evolution, some call theory of common descent) is anti-science. Evolutionist can never address these facts - many unfortunately just fall back on ad hominem, showing how they're seem to be really about deception that's contrary to actual science. ===== Part TWO ===== Here are a few objections/claims they may bring up when they cannot address the above observable, repeatable and verifiable facts: *Evolutionists sometimes try to claim you're against science.* Science is fine and requires no belief. In the entire existence of the human race: Objects drop to the ground. Observable, repeatable, verifiable, no belief required. In the entire existence of the human race: Diseases spread. Observable, repeatable, verifiable, no belief required. In the entire existence of the human race: All populations of: canines remain canines, fish remain fish, reptiles remain reptiles, animals that never had hearts do not evolve hearts, animals that never had digestive systems do not evolve digestive systems (or brains, or eyes, or reproductive systems and many, many more cases like these). Observable, repeatable, verifiable, no belief required. *Evolutionists sometimes try to say they don't claim that populations of 'animals turn into other animals' over generations* Quite the opposite. Evolutionists claim the first life form was a single cell. They claim that it is the ancestor of all living things today. That's "animals turning into other animal" over generations of mythological proportions. They claim humans, apes, rats, banana plants (50% DNA similarity to human beings) are all related - that's again "species turning into other species" of mythological proportions, claiming all life is related. At some point reptiles did not exist in their worldview. That means they claim over generations some populations animals that were never reptiles 'evolved' over generations eventually into reptiles - That's "animals turning into other animals" over generations to mythological degrees. At some point no animals had brains. This means they claim over generations some populations of animals that never had brains 'evolved' brains over generations. Yet when called out on this some evolutionists even try to say "evolution doesn't say species turn into other species", which again is just not honest. It shows they not only know they're wrong, but they show their intent to push this falsehood anyway. *If you point out evolutionists "populations over generations" claims, and some will dishonestly pretend you're claiming evolutionists are saying that one kind of animal 'gives birth' to another kind".* Which again is clearly deception. Science shows *populations over generations* do not do what they claim. *Evolutionists typically imply making up reasons to believe in their common descent from a first life form belief system is the same as "observing" it,* which of course is false and is just circular reasoning. Making up beliefs ABOUT fossils or ABOUT DNA *that never happens* does not then make fossils or DNA 'evidence' or an 'observation of' of the belief you just made up about them. *Evolutionists also typically resort to the crime analogy.* For example, since you cannot "observe" a certain crime, but can look at "evidence" for a crime, that shows we can know things happened without observing it. But what they ignore: the thing called a "crime" is already observable, repeatable, verifiable reality, so now we can look for forensic 'evidence' of some *MORE* possible crimes that no one is left alive to have observed it. By sharp contrast, what evolutionists do would be the same as giving 'evidence' for some strange new crime that's never been observed even once by the human race, and yet claim that's also an observation of this crime that never happens actually happening (for example: a "crime" of turning someone into a tree). *Even some people factually observing something that's never happened is not science if it's not repeatable and also verifiable*. So for example, hundreds of people are witness to the fact Jesus Christ rose from the dead (or that He raised others from death), and they wrote about it. Direct observation. But it's still not science because it's *not repeatable* and not *verifiable.* There's also evidence He rose from the dead, and some have observed Him alive after the fact, but it's STILL not science that people can be raised from the dead, in spite of evidence, and in spite of it also being directly observed - because it's not *repeatable* and not *verifiable.* And so it goes with the belief of common descent from a first life form - not only is it not *repeatable,* not *verifiable,* it's not even *observable* either - which makes the resurrection far more likely to be called science before the belief of common descent from a first life form ever could. But neither of them can be called science of course. ===== Part Three ===== *Evolutionists almost always are against Christ but are teaching their religion* that goes along with their belief of common descent from a first life form - the belief of 'nothing did it - it all just happened on it's own, including life - you're just another animal related to all animals - so live how you want and you'll rest in peace when you die". But they also pass this religion off 'you are god' off as science as well. That in mind, I implore people to re-read the gospels and forget what any church or any religion or anyone has claimed they say and sincerely consider yet again for ourselves. Judgment is coming for us all for our lifetime of sinning AND refusing God's offer to forgive and forget in the person of Jesus Christ. But religions also twist God's truth to make people think it's their religion and system of rules that makes them right with God when it's about a person: Jesus Christ, and choosing to have a relationship with Him, having a change of mind about living for ourselves and turning back towards God/ Jesus Christ to live for Him instead. John 3 : 14-21 *_"[Jesus said] And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up [i.e., on the cross]: That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life. For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved [exposed]. But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God."_* Live forever, friend!
It's painful to watch.. what's wrong with his way of questioning it's like he already has an answer which is set in stone no matter what other people tell em, he's just trying to piss people off and feed them his belief
It’s on purpose Bc when you start looking into evolution it becomes apparent we should have found transitional fossils yet we haven’t which is strange don’t you think. I’m not arguing either way just stating a fact.
Here is my argument. Come to think of it. You will have answers to whatever inconsistencies or contradictions or questions thrown at you by people not in your faith. Now these answers are enough for you but might be illogical to me. And the reverse is true for any one in any other faith. You prescribe to the beliefs of your forefathers. Your ancestors have spread these beliefs just like they were spread to them (assuming you're European or American). This is your culture, something you hold paramount, something you hold to be the absolute truth. The same exact feelings you have towards your faith are true for the Muslim, the Jew, the Hindu, the many African mythologists. Doesn't it bother you that what you hold as the truth is just a mere consequence of the course of history. Had history taken a different course and the Africans were the ones who colonized Europe, chances are you would be subscribing to their beliefs today. Your faith is not any different from any other in the world.
Hello. People have come to faith in Jesus Christ from all backgrounds, all upbringings, all ages, all races, all cultures. So us pretending it's only because we were taught it by our parents is moot. Secondly, there are 2000 prophesies in the Bible that have come true locally/globally, even up to thousands of years after being written. Other 'religious' texts: none. In the Bible there are dozens of facts about reality that even scientists could not figure out until up to thousands of years after being written. Other 'religious' texts: none. The Bible was written over 1500 years through 40 penmen, multiple languages, over three continents, reads as one mind. Every other 'religious' text: one person, one lifetime. The grave of Christ is empty. The grave of every other 'religion's prophet has their bones. This won't matter to those determined to reject Christ - but it will leave us all without excuse before God thinking we'll be able to say "well how was I supposed to know?!" I implore people to re-read the Gospels yet again and forget what any religion / church / commentator claims they say - it will be our own fault if we're deceived by them. God / Jesus Christ did not come here to create a world-wide religious organization - but instead to adopt / save individuals, by faith, that they then live a lifetime of works towards God, joining local congregations (church).
@Jnr Burns Religion?? What's religion got to do with it? Jesus says To come unto Me all you who are weary and heavy laden and I will give you rest! It's an individual choice to come to Jesus... religion is a man made word. It's your choice to believe or not.
@Andrew Davis God made Adam and Eve. Humans are from them. For it was You who created my inward parts; You knit me together in my mother’s womb. Psalms 139:13 HCSB
This video is absurd. Right up there with Ray Comfort's ignorant clip on the banana. Professor P.Z. Myers (University of Minnesota, Morris) is consistently on target in his responses. The interviewer repeatedly asks for evidence for a 'change of kinds'. By this he means a transition sufficiently large to require millions of years in the fossil record. Yet the fossil record is dismissed because it falls outside the interviewer's narrow perception of scientific evidence. Many of the interviewees are understandably confused. That no example exists within the specified bounds has no bearing on the historical fact of evolution or the well established mechanisms by which it occurs. Ditto, the questioning on the impossibility of fabricating a rose from nothing. No plausible alternative explanation for the fossil record is presented. The segment on famous atheists is unsurprising. The editors omit any response in which a famous atheist was named. It is also irrelevant because it has no bearing on the evidence for evolution. That said, two-thirds of American academic scientists are atheist or agnostic, and nearly all of the best scientists - for good reason. Religion doesn't make any sense. At stake is not the existence or non-existence of a generic or generalized god but the dozens of gods in which people actually believe, the ones that care about our sins and sex lives and respond to prayer. Those gods are imaginary, incompatible with our scientific understanding of how the natural world works. The inevitable segment on morality is likewise irrelevant. Only those with no knowledge of history or other cultures could conclude that an absolute yardstick exists. Morality is whatever we and the society in which we live decides that it ought to be. Scripture is in any case a dreadful point of departure for moral guidance. While many of those questioned display an appalling lack of understanding of evolution and the evidence for evolution, like all science evolution depends entirely on evidence. It has nothing to do with belief or 'blind faith'. It is misleading even to ask whether someone 'believes' in evolution. Those who wish to become better informed should read: Jerry A. Coyne, 2009, Why Evolution is True: Penguin, 282 p. Comfort himself is invited to join me in the field in March, 2014 to examine the geological record (the actual evidence) up close. It is one thing to be ignorant, and quite another dishonestly to mislead the general public in the way that Living Waters does. - Nicholas Christie-Blick, Professor, Columbia University
You just showed proof of the same blind faith that Richard Dawkins thinks you are a complete idiot for having. Why are you so angry at a movie that just made evolutionists and atheists question their "faith" in their beliefs? All the same evolutionary professors do to young, impressionable, students (many times Christian) when these professors and teachers have an intellectual advantage over the students they issue grades to. At least this guy approached them without having them under has thumb with test scores, grades, and class failure! Why can't you be intellectually honest?
Low-hanging fruit, Dana. My classes are entirely about how to think critically about evidence. All of the observational evidence in this case points in one direction: the diversity of life relates to evolution by natural selection, not divine creation. Ray Comfort has no interest in the evidence. Indeed he dismisses the fossil evidence as somehow irrelevant when it is obviously critical to the interpretation of a lineage. As a creationist, he isn't even honest. In a defense of a critique of this clip he implies that he has no problem with the long timescale implied by geology - the timescale over which divine intervention is neither required nor plausible. Yet, at the end of this piece, he pushes the Creation Museum in Kentucky. The Answers in Genesis folk at that museum are adamant that only Young Earth Creationism is admissible. Those positions are wholly incompatible.
ForumLight The evolutionary pathway from fish to humans: lobe-finned fish to tetrapods, to amphibians, to reptiles, to mammals, to primates, to humans. It took about 400 million years. Prof. Myers's quip was evidently in full knowledge of such facts, which are established beyond any reasonable doubt in the scientific community. (The anatomical evidence is overwhelming.)
Nicholas Christie-Blick Yes, I know but (sigh..) Forum Light will not want to engage in a *real* science discussion regarding evolution. This observation is, alas, from experience. All the air went out of his balloon when someone showed him that the Universe couldn't possibly be only 6,000 years old. He disappeared, defeated, but apparently is back now for more trolling.
ForumLight Please re-read what I wrote. Given that you're not a scientist (obviously), I recommend Neil Shubin's 2009 book, 'Your Inner Fish': Vintage Books, 237 p.
Vladimir Mladenov one doesn’t believe in science. It is just the clearest pathway to the truth. But what is especially uninteresting is non scientists making ignorant assertions about a discipline they know nothing about.
Oh, trust me they do! More than you apparently know 😉 Evolution has never been proved! It has always been yet another hypothesis that even some of it’s greatest proponents doubted and admitted that it’s more of a substitute belief for theism than a “proved” theory. And trust me, I’ve experienced this propaganda first hand during the atheistic communist regime! Evolution=Religion - Check this out: "Evolution is unproven and unprovable. We believe it only because the only alternative is special creation?" Evolutionist Sir Arthur Keith
Vladimir Mladenov just by quoting someone doesn’t make any assertion you have close to truth. Evolution is a sound theory. Science doesn’t prove things. Do you even know how science works? The Soviet world had some pretty outstanding scientific minds.
I love the analogy of the money belt and you're drowning. Of course you'd let go of your riches. We need to let go of the things that are pulling us under.
"Enlightenment" is actually speaking just as much about weight as it is light. The body is dense, the spirit is light, and rises easily. Enlightenment can only be achieved by dropping the spiritual density.
@@emmanuelthwala2809 That is a piece of some ancient spiritual knowledge. It has been known for centuries: the spirit is not physical, but more like vapor or smoke, the soul is likened to water, the eyes are the window to the soul, the eyes contain salt water, the eyes can see, aka SEA. The body is likened to the earth elements, made up of the dust of the earth. Language is spelling, spell casting. to lighten your density is to transfer from the flesh or the physical, to the metaphysical and spiritual realms of being. Too much to get into right now...
@@quantumleap4023 Eh ok I get that the spirit , soul and flesh be different but this new age stuff just gonna take by the arm and pull you to hell my dude💔 so plz just get JESUS 🙏👊
I am not an evolution defender, and I belive in God, but after watching this video, I wondered that some evolutionists would do the question "but how do you explain that all living beings share the same DNA, wich is evidence that evolution is true?" and I wouldn't know what to answer. pretty good talk thoguh, great way to spread Jesus's gosplel! keep working on that!
Why would all life that's not related have to have 0% dna similarity/ If two living things have eyes, why would there not be some amount of dna similarity because of that? Science is about the repeatable portion of reality, not things like common descent evolution that contradict repeatable reality, can only be believed in, and they call reasons to believe in it 'evidence'. The bottom line is the topic of the origin of all biological diversity is beyond the scope of science as beliefs, and reasons to believe in it, are all anyone can bring to the table. Here's what *is* science: A.k.a., well documented and published even in evolutionists' own papers (when they happen to include something that's actually observable, repeatable, verifiable biological, scientific fact when they're telling their common descent stories and why they believe in it) that demonstrates common descent from a first life form is anti-science. Science shows that it's observable, repeatable, verifiable scientific fact that, no matter how many generations go by, no matter how much "change in genetic composition during successive generations", no matter how much "change in allele frequencies", no matter how much "development of new species", no matter how much "natural selection acting on genetic variation among individuals", no matter how much "adaptation", no matter how much "mutation", no matter how much "speciation", no matter how much "migration", no matter how much "genetic drift", no matter how much "insert other claims here" no matter how many generations go by, ALL populations of: fish remain fish amphibians remain amphibians, canines remain canines, felines remain felines, reptiles remain reptiles, birds remain birds, viruses remain viruses, animals that never had lungs to breath air do not evolve lungs animals that never had hearts to pump blood do not evolve hearts animals that never had eyes to see do not evolve eyes animals that never had brains do not evolve brains animals that never had mouths do not evolve mouths living things that never had a reproductive system do not evolve a reproductive system animals that never had (insert organ here) remain living things without that organ, and so on. There are many more such groups. Science shows that the "common descent from a first life form" evolution (some call Darwinian evolution, some call theory of common descent) is anti-science. Evolutionist can never address these facts - many unfortunately just fall back on ad hominem, showing how they're seem to be really about deception that's contrary to actual science.
@@ForumLight "Why would all life that's not related have to have 0% dna similarity/ If two living things have eyes, why would there not be some amount of dna similarity because of that? " thats not how genetics work. Genes dont always have physical alterations of an organism, you can trace these physically altering genes alongside other genes which activate them to create a family tree.
@@LouAnnBagnall I know, but for evolutionists saying "they just have the same creator" is not enough... they want evidence about genetics, that all life is related
It's actually an unintellect thought to think and believe that humans evolved from 'nothing'. The movie is worth watching and worth to share to youngsters who are under the captivity of the devil's 'scientific' lies!
Athiests don't belive we evolved from nothing. We know the Big Bang is the act of the universe expanding, but we don't know the cause, or if that event even needs a cause. And we aren't afraid to say we don't know instead of making up myths to comfort us in the absense of knowledge.
@@elchanguas9499them where does that thing( whatever it is called) that expands (which is why it's called the big bang) come from if it didn't came nothing? Same question for the first life that evolved to humans.
@@jehielmutia1744 the "Big bang" definetly has a cause, one that hasn't been discovered or Maybe one wich we have know since we existed (yes, im talking about God), the same goes for the first life forms. I believe in God, im Christian
*"Its not God vs Evolution. God created the universe to be evolutionary in everything"* But God created human beings at the beginning - He did not create a world of suffering and death, where populations of fish evolved over generations eventually into amphibians, then reptiles, then mammals, then apes, then human beings. Huge difference. God makes it clear in His Word He did no such thing.
Absolutely brilliant comment. When God Created the Earth, He Created everything Full Sized. The trees, the mountains and animals, everything. I believe He created the Earth to look much older than it truly was. A little God patina if you will. Someone asked my Preacher, "What came first the chicken or the egg?" He explained that God did indeed create the chicken first and full size. Love your comment. :)
@@timgiles9413 Why did he need a worldwide flood to murder innocent babies and animals then? Couldn't he have just banished all the 'sinful' people and started over? No need for a flood.
CG but everyone was sinful. It was stated in the Bible. Even the babies would grow up to be sinful since they had sinful parents, and God knew that. We can’t ever forget that God is all-knowing and he had a plan. It’s not blind faith, it’s just faith that leans on the fact that God is good and cares for all humans, even though we are all sinful and in desperate need of help.
@@bennettoneill203 A plan to allow an innocent child to be born to be murdered by him soon after ( which he would have known ) a plan to allow children to be born with permanent disabilities and illness from birth. What kind of sick monster do you worship?
Hello. Common descent from a first cell evolution is the claim that populations of living things that never had brains 'evolved' brains over generations. Same for eyes, or ears, hearts, lungs, digestive systems, reproductive systems and so much more. Ask them to cite evolution doing any of this over generations. They can't, proving this belief of theirs is contrary to all of biology / science. Be not deceived, friend. I implore people to re-read the gospels yet again and forget what any religion / church claims they say, and see for yourself. God / Jesus Christ did not come here to create a world-wide organized religion to control all churches. He saves individuals and they form/join local churches.
@@DisticTV Someone must be projecting because there is not only no sign of anger from anyone, besides you, on this thread, I never get angry at anything online. Nor does stupidity anger me, it's normal. It took billions of years of evolution by natural selection for roses to come about. Only a complete idiot would think that was clever. It's the sort nonsense that I expect from people that work this hard at being ignorant. Now whipping up an imaginary god is what only takes a moment.
ForumLight Still not answering my questions. You are just telling more lies. That is not a coincidence. Bible believers normally have no explainable moral, they are rotten to the core, so what they try to do is to tell lies about others like "killing people" and so on. When someone explains that humans are similar to other animals that would cause exact the opposite. We would become vegetarians, because that we are not mentally handicapped like mice for example is caused by random selection. That means: We would stop murdering our animal cousins etc. BECAUSE it would be MURDER.
Humans are mammals like dogs, horses, pigs etc. But dogs and the most other animals are mentally handicapped, because of the lack of brain development.That means we need to show enormous empathy to those (all life on this world) because it is like helping mentally handicapped humans - someone we should help. That is a reason why Dawkins and Co. know that to be vegan is from an ethical point of view the best way to life. They are just to lazy like bible believers like ForumLight are to lazy to throw his fear about hell fairy tales.
Angelmou While I personally am not an expert on the subject matter, I feel the need to bring something up. I have several questions. If vegan is ethical, why is it ethical? Who says it is ethical, and on what grounds are they allowed to say that it is ethical? What are you basing your ethics on? I bring these questions up, because the major flaw in your argument is that if you do not have an Objective (or outside based) set of morals, then it is necessary for you to have a Subjective (or personal) set of morals. If your morals are subjective, they vary from person to person, stating that so long as a person is content with their actions, the actions are ethical. I don't mean to rant, but I cannot see how something is ethical or moral to the entire world unless there are objective morals. If you can answer the questions logically and present a valid argument for those questions, your statement about "They are just to lazy like bible believers like ForumLight are to lazy to throw his fear about hell fairy tales." might be considered. Thank you.
ForumLight "that I'm just an animal," You are so confused that you even think the word "animal" is some sort of insult or offense. Animal is an absolute neutral term. It is not an offense nor it is a compliment - It is a description of what we are nothing more.
The interviewer is so frustrating! He keeps interrupting them and misunderstanding what they’re saying. The professors keep on trying to tell them that in order to see observable changes in species (or “kinds” as the interviewer puts it) there needs to be a larger time frame. And since obviously the modern human hasn’t been around for amount of time needed for species to species change, theres is no “observable” changes. But the example the professors are giving, the finches and bacteria, are proof that change still does happen, but in smaller ways because of the smaller time frame tldr: human life is short, thus cannot see the billion years of evolution. But can still see the small changes in the decades of observation.
@@VictoriaLeigh1990 Microevolution is literally macroevolution but on a smaller scale. For example we know for a fact that the solar system, the milky way galaxy exists, the solar system is just on a smaller scale compared to the milky way galaxy.
@Justin Gary Of course it does man , but we can infer from the trends and small changes in the small time frame to make an estimate of how much has already changed. It's like how you can graph a line just by using two points close to each other.
If you want to see this movie without all of the blurred censoring that TH-cam put on this video, as well as with an expansion, go here: th-cam.com/video/jeSxIqAYP4M/w-d-xo.html
When I watch the original, there are no blurred faces. Maybe they removed it because they were busted and called out...
How odd that it only started being blurred out in certain areas.
@Jeb Bohanan they only blurred the faces of the "scientists". I'm assuming because the "scientists" were ridiculous, and absolutely didn't do any favors to their religion of evolution.
But now when I watch it, they're not blurred...
@@TinaMarie75 😂😂😂😂 "'religion of evolution'" ??? 😂
@jesusgavemeaids yes...
evolution is just as much a religion as any other. It takes more faith to believe everything came from nothing than to believe in a Creator. It's taught in schools and nothing else is allowed to be taught. Evolutionists defend their stance just as any religious person defends their deity. It's no different than a religion.
I am a Chemist and after many years of being an atheist I began a path to creationism. I seem to be a happier person since reading the new testament.
For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ. 2 Corinthians 4:2
The eyes of your understanding being enlightened; that ye may know what is the hope of his calling, and what the riches of the glory of his inheritance in the saints,Ephesians 1:18
amen! God bless you!
Mick9 And you will make a good witnessing tool to the science community in showing them that science is the affirmation of God's dominion.
Maybe even write a book.
I would buy it.📕
rgsand01 Its time to stop. Its his life, stop judging.
And you will be happier if you read Quran, may God bless you and gide you
My mother and sister have prayed for me to be free from my heroin addiction for a decade and I am finally set free and born again in Christ! Glory to God!!! ✝️🧎🏻♀️
I don’t have a religion, I have a relationship. I don’t have a support system, I’m in the process of finding a church. All I do have is my Faith and my God. All I know is, nothing else worked until I found God.
My only intent is to tell MY testimony and what worked for ME. Everyone has their own journey.
Amen! And the unfortunate hate believers receive is just more proof of the truth of God.
*_"If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you. If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you. Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my saying, they will keep yours also. But all these things will they do unto you for my name's sake, because they know not him that sent me."_*
John 15 : 18-21
May God bless!
ForumLight Thank you so much for your kindness and inspiration! I’m truly grateful for your beautiful soul. I will never stop giving the glory to God no matter what. ✝️🧎🏻♀️ God bless you also.
Still Booble Praying for you. God bless. ✝️✝️✝️✝️🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Sir Isaac Newton the greatest scientist who ever lived, was a strong believer in God and in fact wrote more about God than he did about science.
Wasn't he the one that made the quote, "you are a fool if you don't believe in God" or something.
If you're willing can you give what he wrote or books you suggest about his evidence.......I'm not just asking I really mean it.....www.muamuanngaihte24@gmail
@@muamuanngaihte5055 I know of the Principia Mathematica was written by Newton. In that book he wrote that he made the book so that the thinking man might believe in God. Newton also said what a wonderful God to do gravity that way.
@@kennethgee2004 thank you
@@themilkyway1371The second part is not true. The universal law of gravity is still in effect. The formula still predict how large bodies interact. The no law will ever be overturned as a law by definition is prove to such a degree that all possibilities have be exhausted. There is no way to invalidate a law.
Hello Ray. As a Muslim I translated your video into Farsi (Persian) and it was well praised in Iran.
link??
❤
So you are not a muslim then anymore?
I have a question for all you Adam and Eve believers ... explain pygmy peoples? explain different skin colours? explain why asians have narrow eyes? explain neanderthal fossils? If we're all descended from Adam and Eve why do we have so many different looking races? Hmmm ... could that be adaption, which, of course, is the mechanism that leads to evolution?
Doesnt change the fact that Iranians belief in the false God and will end up in hell.
i wish Muslims would convert to Christianity, because we need such strong believers.
Because the world already is so wicked.
Now i believe in Jesus Christ
Amen!
@ it's a privilege to serve God.
@ I want you to imagine a speck of Sand compared to the entire universe, what would that speck of sand be in comparison to the universe? nothing right, now imagine that intensified, imagine your life compared to eternity, eternity! So do you want to thrive in this world now or eternity? because I tell you very truly that the second you give your life to CHRIST from then on it will be a eternity of flourishing life that’s what GOD is LIFE, GOD is life if you want life you need GOD
Repent( turn away) from your sins and not only believe God but also put all your trust and faith and all in Christ and also believe that He died on the cross for all of our sins and for all of us and rose on the third day to prove He’s the son of God (God in the flesh) and that He has authority over death and all
Acts 3:19
Repent, then, and turn to God, so that your sins may be wiped out, that times of refreshing may come from the Lord,
Proverbs 3:5
Trust in the LORD with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding;
@ you are using God's name in vein and will have to face him one day on judgement day
@ People often think God is trying to take something from you. But it's the opposite. It's all about what he can GIVE to you. This is the greatest love story on earth and I would hate for you to miss out...Just think about it friend.
"Professing to be wise they became fools." Romans 1 v22.
Ever since I saw Bikers For Trump I had a realization. Bikers can be adorable.
So that could later become wise
If a fool can figure out evolution is true then what's your excuse?
Prehistoric Proboscidean fools, by their very nature and meaning of the word,"fool", can't figure out anything. However, the "fool" hath said in his heart, there is no God!
RevvedUpBiker
Cltr C
Cltr V
GG
I believe in evolution..I evolved from a filthy sinner..into a born again Christian.
Ameeen
@John Viola I will pray for you
@@darkeen42 says the delusional.
@@darkeen42 Lmao. This has *nothing* to do with this section. Get a life or something. At least *try* to act like your coherent.
And *No* Marx is *Clearly* Atheist. Maybe *You* Don't want to associate with *Him.*
@@darkeen42 Well *Yes* It originated via Christian and Pre Christian Civilizations of Europe.
That Said, No One is Complaining when Christians Are being persecuted unfairly by both the Romans and Jews alike. But when the *Same* Thing Happens to the Jews or what is left of the Pagans if Rome, it's all "No you can't do that!"
A Case Double Standards ain't it? In any case *no* I don't condone Anti Semitism in *any* way. But I won't deny that anti semitism was a development ( an unfortunate one at that ) from Christian and Pre Christian Civilizations of Europe.
But all of this is assuming that Christianity was the original "cause" for it. While I won't deny that Christianity contributed to it via the phenomenon of anti semitism receiving institutionalization within European Christianity. It has been expressed in Ancient Greece and the Roman Empire, Possibly before Christianity Got Saved by Constantine.
So the idea of anti semitism has been in circulation even before Christianity hit it big. And even then, it's unfortunate that Christianity made the prejudice worse. But compared to the Holocaust ( Again, Hitler is *not* a Catholic, not anymore ), we should be glad that those Jews Pre Holocaust didn't suffer worse fates then... Well the Holocaust.
That said: *Why* are we discussing this *here!*
Come on! At least *try* to act Mature. Let alone Coherent.
You did mentioned something very true: PEOPLE ARE SO INTO LIVING A SINFUL & EARTHLY LIFE STYLE, they don’t want to leave it , so they AVOID EVERYTHING ABOUT GOD’S TRUTH ! Period.
Let's put gods truth to the test .
Can this crap show of a universe be repeated .
Does a kind mean species.
Does god know more than you.
Does god change.
Does Ray understand science.
Let's keep the education the bible has to offer humanity on that same shelf, reserved for fariy tales and magically caused events, such as the illusion of Ray Comfort being a wise man.
Take a better look at your intellectual designer and the design. See the flaws.
True that. One day we'll all know the truth but by that time, it'll be too late for many.
@@krazylevin
Why would it be too late for so many people or because they don't believe the same way you do. Mind you there are cultures much much older than Christianity and Muslim and Hindi and yet they don't seem to be credited with being the original knowledge of what God's mind is like
@@qhvianthomasmidgely5th.62 praying for you
@@hinokami_10 Thinking for you.
I believe God created the Universe 🙏🏼❤️
Believing in things doesn't make them true.
Stephen Muga never said they do
@@itzdiva7914 *sighs* You don't understand logic, do you?
@@itzdiva7914 Please continue basking in your ignorance
@@itzdiva7914 It's too late for that, don't you think?
Greetings from Italy 🇮🇹 after I found living waters gospel my life changed.. GOD bless everyone
This is how I hate those people
Dio non esiste fratello
Al N quello che tu pensi non cambia la realtà
@@rebeccaafriyie105 La realtà è che evoluzionne è vera e un fatto de la nostra realità.
@@kijul468 dipende da cosa intendi con evoluzione. Se ti riferisci all’adattamento allora sì, ma se si parla di macroevoluzione, questa non è mai stata provata ma semplicemente dedotta. Ci sono un sacco di pezzi mancanti che non sono mai stati trovati perché non sono mai esistiti. Nessuna specie si è mai letteralmente evoluta in un’altra. E la realtà lo testimonia.
Jesus appeared to me in a radical way and transformed my life forever , thanks for the video
Jason Merkel amen brother...he’s real!! hell is real and heaven is real. The bible makes so much sense
Jesús it's real, but this video isn't, the evolution exists
Amen 🙏
dont you mean jeshua?
@@halogen5580 no we dont we mean jesus 🙏🏼🙏🏿
I remember reading the Bible one of my first times as a new believer. There was a list of does and donts and I realized I was doing a lot of the donts. I didn’t read my Bible for at least two weeks after that. I felt like I could never live up to that standard. The Holy Spirit was still with me tho and convicted me to press on with my studies. 7 years later and I’ve grown so much in Christ ♥️ granted I’ve still got more growing to do but God will finish what He started in me ❤️
It is hard to admit we are sinners and need to be reborn, but it’s so worth it. Thank you Jesus
Lately I've been feeling so sinful. I follow God and I try to be righteous but I feel like God doesn't want me.
@@drea8024 Drea, God sent his son as a substitute for yours and my sins. Satan is a liar, of course thats how you will "FEEL" because the liar whispers lies unto you. God "WHISPERS" truths unto you from the bible. Go read Luke 4, how did Jesus overcome the devils lies? So, when Satan asked him to cast himself down from on high, Jesus simply said, It is WRITTEN, thou shall not tempt the Lord thy God. When Satan offered him all the kingdoms of the world o-if he would only follow him, Jesus simply said, "Thou shalt worship the Lord they God only, etc. etc. Read the word. Stay out of THE WORLD. God Bless
@@drea8024 Even Paul said that the things he does, he doesn’t want to do….salvation doesn’t mean you will not sin. When you do sin you have an advocate. I spent 20 years after salvation not thinking I was saved bc I wasnt changing as much as I thought I should. Just let God transform you day to day. Google the promises of God and read them every day.
cringe
@@frostymcfang4656 Enjoy your stupidity in hell.
I DO believe in the "Big Bang" theory. I believe that GOD spoke it and "BANG" it happened.
@Edward The Booble "i believe"
@Edward The Booble you are evidence that there has to be God, cuz I dont know where in the world you Love, sense of Justice, morals especially Morals and conscience come from unless love evolved too 😅😅😅😅😅
that made me giggle
Do you know that the bible tells us how God created us and it was not with a bang or BOOM. Just search Genesis 1 And then read chapter 1 and Chapter 2.
@@dktn8080 it was a joke cuh
It makes me so sad that the older ones are the ones who are the most stubborn whereas the younger ones are willing to change :(
That’s because they are likely hard hearted. They have probably heard the gospel before, and the Holy Spirit convicts the world of sin and judgment, but they probably resisted all the way to that age. There seems to be a point where God lets go, because when you say no the first time, it becomes easier to say no again. But of course we should pray for them.
God is never changing . Mankind does though. GOD says these things are evil and Ya'll don't like what HE SAYS so you try to change people's minds with your carnal way of thinking. Do you think GODS mind will be changed when you stand before HIM! And you will stand before HIM! Who are you to rail against the ALMIGHTY GOD! For unbelievers there will be wailing and gnashing of teeth.
@@cowboymouth6429 Have you stoned anyone recently? If not, then why aren't you following God's word?
@@psilocybinx8596 That's the old testament. Try reading it so you can have a better understanding.
Because they're still learning.
I believe in God you can see his work everywhere you look
Bru
Yes sure, covid 19, Ebola, malaria, dengue, bubonic plague, earth quakes, floods, droughts, famines which kill millions of innocent men, women, children and innocent unborn in mothers wombs, YES for sure I can see thhe lovely god around me with his wonderful creation. Only the blind and thhe brainwashed cant see, on what an irony!!!
@@bdmiller1204 prove Satan exist! If you make claims then you must prove it and do it. The burden of proof is on you now! We are waiting for your proof. Then prove God and prove Jesus is the Son of God too. Over to you the delusionals
@@bdmiller1204 It is just collection of fictions written by men. It does not prove anything. Then prove the Bible is true! I also have lots of books that claim to be true!
@@bdmiller1204 When you claim the Bible as the fact then you have to prove it it is your call.
I love the extremely thoughtful way Ray evokes our God-reflected intelligence :) I was an agnostic for 27 years, and it brought me nothing but despair, suicidality, and existential dread. When Ray spoke of his life changing overnight, I can absolutely attest to that. Christianity has given me peace, understanding, and purpose. I started pursuing it with the idea of, 'Even if it's not real, what harm can it do?' I didn't quite expect to be so wholly changed, but I no longer have an excuse to doubt. People love their sin, and they also, like me, might feel that they couldn't possibly be accepted by God because of their inability to understand or logically reason it. But if you take the Bible at face value, with honest objectivity, it offers the most logical moral argument for human existence and creation than any other book I've had the pleasure of reading.
“Christianity, if false, is of no importance, and if true, of infinite importance, the only thing it cannot be is moderately important.”
― C.S. Lewis
Better safe than sinning, I say. :) and as Ray has said, 'Fear is your friend.' It's that innate sense of value God placed on each and every one of us that keeps us alive. We need to value our eternity just as much as our immediate, observable life.
I love you, reader. I hope you will search for the greatest Love and Peace ever known.
This deserves so many more likes and comments 🎉
@@alexabbitt6135
No. As an Agnostic I know that he is not going evidence or reason which is what Agnostics do. He chose to give on reality and join a religion that makes promises based on nothing but whatever it takes to con the gullible.
God reflected intelligence? What intelligence
"Christianity, if false, is of no importance "- I'm not sure the victims of religious wars, persecutions and genocide would agree with you there.
@@frostymcfang4656
What can you expect from a guy that called himself an Atheist because he was angry at his god? C. S Lewis was not rational where his religion was involved.
"People are fish." - Society's smart people today.
And do you understand what they mean by it?
@@Demiligne of course. I also understand when quantum scientists tell us the universe doesn't really exist. Only problem is that I can see that it does. And I can see that we're not fish.
Good, we're not literal fish. So what's your understanding of why smart people would say we are?
@@Demiligne because they think everything evolved from the ocean. Also, our atmosphere is liquid like compared to the atmosphere of other planets... plus some people are as dumb as fish and swim in schools.
@@Demiligne But also, those same smart people would say a whale isn't a fish so the irony is palpable.
I believe in God
@Jahmed Music true
Which god?
So does Satan believe in God
and Trembles.
@Jahmed Music I have one point that I think is a solid argument that crumbles the christian doctrine, admitably it does hinge on the modern scientific understanding evolution being true. But for the sake of the logic, stick with me.
Evolution requires death to happen, species cannot evolve unless the "unfit" organism die out. the bible claim that sin is the source of death "the wages of sin is death". Before humans could have sined they must have existed. If humans came from evolution( which I acknowledge you probably don think is true) then sin could not be the cause of death and the doctrine of original sin, a cornerstone of Christianity, falls.
I bring this up because for a long time I believed that evolution was guided by the christian God. When I came to resize that was logically impossible, that was one of the major causes of me giving up my belief in God.
@@nupsi6 because Fluff wants to
This scripture decribes scientist so well----- 2 timothy 3:7 " ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth."
Good one.
That's right. That's what science is *supposed* to do. We never come to absolute truth, we just find more things to explore and more answers.
It also describes Trinitarians well.
Yes and no. Those not dedicated to nature worship or denial of God have been very fruitful. Who is a scientist? Who is merely wise in his own eyes?
@@BearcatSandor Where did you pull that from? They come up with theories that they often pass off as truth such as evolution. The laws of physics and science were established by the creator...Yehovah.
I dont believe in a man in the sky..
Seriously?
A being with unfathomable power,
Controls time, the complex design of every cell and of animals.
The very universe itself is no accident.
As wise i am, i gave up thinking for myself. I surrendered because God's method is way way superior than my own that i could ever come up with
Well whatever. Everyone will face God and be reminded how he manifested and called on us many times i feel like
I just found this channel.. that past year my heart has been calling for Jesus in my life.
Be Free, Die Trying:
Jesus died for you
so He wouldn't have to live
without you.
You are on your Way, buddy! Study Scripture daily, and pray to God or Jesus before you open your Bible, asking Them to send The Holy Spirit to enlighten your heart and mind about what you're preparing to read.
My recommendation is this: Read the five chapters of 1st John (that's the 1st epistle of John, not the Gospel of John) over and over until you know you know it. Then begin to study the rest of The Bible. 1st John 1-5 is the perfect overview of the entire message of The Bible.
basic instructions before leaving earth BIBLE !!!
Yay! Jesus loves you!!
Don't let the scoffers and unbelievers shake your faith.
@@ericmoore6769 lol what a stupid comment. Another atheist that acts like theists can't be smart 😂😂
"For the word of the cross is folly to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God."
--1 Corinthians 1:18 (ESV)
Ben Meitzen Amen!🙌
daaang, 58 likes and the third comment on a popular video!
You call God the fool then, what this man quoted were not his own words. "The way of a fool is right in his own eyes: but he that hearkeneth unto counsel is wise." Proverbs 12:15 KJV.
My counsel is this, read the 4 gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) and if you've never done so try to pray before reading (It's like talking to a friend). If by those end of those books your eyes have yet to be opened, you can then say at the very least the book has been.
rgsand01 you only have to look into the infinite sky . Day or night. That's infinity. Or you can think that almost every human society throughout time has had a firm belief in God because they were all not as smart as you. Atheists know there is God. It's in us all. Don't hide it. Let it come out. Can't hurt.
Do you feel strong ? how long do you think that strength will last you if you do ? This isn't about church or religion, it's about you, to try to tell people that HAVE EXPERIENCED GOD is like trying to disprove air. THAT is foolishness, what separates the believer and non believer is not just faith, but experience. I personally did not believe matter of fact i said that i hated God because he'd done nothing for me. Took 5 years after that to come to terms that i'm nothing and nobody and that we're all on the same ride to somewhere. You're not a humble person that i can tell, and i'm not judging i'm observing. So one day when life's just a bit too hard you'll call on God.....and mark my words you will. You will be changed, specifically that hard heart of yours. I say this from experience i used to be you, making fun of the believers and existing my way through life miserably. You may be riding that non believing high horse of yours but trust me when i tell you. You will fall off one day, see who comes to help.
“Take a look at what happened 65 million years ago” I can’t... that was 65 million years ago. 😂😂
@@tracyharyklia8883 , when Jesus was crufied 2000 years ago, there were people who seen it and wrote the story. 2000 years ago people were well versed in written langauge und literature. 65 millions ago there no human beings on earth who would have recorded the histroy thats the different.
@bl Thing is God is the problem because he created Satan. If he was all knowing, why did he create satan in the first place?
skuggkungen We definitely have free will. It’s not like the other option is to burn in Hell or anything.
skuggkungen Maybe if he didn’t create satan, Eve wouldn’t have been tempted to eat from the tree 🤷♂️. The whole sacrifice seems pointless, is it really sacrifice if he gets it back in 3 days?
I don’t know about you but if an all knowing God can’t even get his intentions right, then something’s wrong somewhere.
I like seeing the comparison between different ages of people. Typically you would think that the younger people are immature and close minded, but it’s clear here that the older “professionals” have no intention of thinking about these things, whereas the younger people are very polite and open minded (most of the time, haha)
the older people have had more time to harden their heart against the Holy Spirit.
The past cost our elders more than it does us in our musings and intellectual experiments.
@@sweetsav11yes it’s sad, they get offended I think their pride and ego blinds them from the truth
I have a question for all you Adam and Eve believers ... explain pygmy peoples? explain different skin colours? explain why asians have narrow eyes? explain neanderthal fossils? If we're all descended from Adam and Eve why do we have so many different looking races? Hmmm ... could that be adaption, which, of course, is the mechanism that leads to evolution?
21:26
Who makes the rules?
"We do"
That says it all
Proverbs 1:7
"The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge; fools despise wisdom and INSTRUCTION."
@@ambrosebussey4672
Prove it is false
@@ambrosebussey4672
Prove the Bible is false. If you cannot prove the Bible is false then you are going by faith, and you are more gullible then a toddler.
Really? did you decide to be born?. Did you decide that sometime in the next week or so you will drink liquid or you will die?. The rules humans make are social/political/economic etc rules. All this anthroposphere ( human social world) is underpinned by natural laws.e.g. Physics and biology (inc evolution).
Great observation! Plus: you shall not have other gods before Me.
@evo: Yes humans make "rules" Duh, BUT humans can't create squat like your creative, magic lighting bolts into the primordial swamp evolution! / religion! & Why not? Not even a simple life form. Doh. but don't let that discourage you! BUT having Godless government enforced your silly faith base mother Gaia Evolution religion on us the living is shameful !
Jesus Christ have mercy on all of us!
Amen ✝️🙏
@@osamanagee594 is Jesus Christ!! Not the islam!
@@osamanagee594 He is God. Muhammed is not a Prophet! The last Prophet was Saint John the Baptist!
@@osamanagee594 let me ask you; do you consider the religion of islam to be one of love?
@@osamanagee594 so please explain love to me by islamic standards. What is love?
I should go to america... I am just a average guy in europe but I would be a genius in america.
Pharoah Akhenaten if he’s an idiot what makes it hard to prove him wrong?
6 Years later:
Bro get into this country we need help
@@elijahrivera4479 WORD
Hahaha me too😂😂
Poop Corporation TM joe mama
Hello ray, iam parimala, science student from India but i need to defend my faith,
I watched almost all your videos, and I want the evidence bible but i can't afford it from India. But i want i, Iam praying God for that bible will be available to me
Hello. I pray that you get a Bible. If there are those professing Christians who claim "God used common descent evolution [because of science]" ask them if they believe that Jesus Christ rose from the dead. They'll say yes. Then point out it IS reproducible scientific fact when a person dies and body grows room temperature they're not coming back. So the resurrection IS contrary to science, yet we believe God anyway. So why throw out other things God makes clear over a common descent belief which is contrary to science. It shows that science is not the issue - but being embarrassed to believe God over what unsaved mankind says.
Science is about the repeatable portion of reality, not things like common descent evolution that contradict repeatable reality, can only be believed in, and they call reasons to believe in it 'evidence'.
The bottom line is the topic of the origin of all biological diversity is beyond the scope of science as beliefs, and reasons to believe in it, are all anyone can bring to the table.
Here's what *is* science: A.k.a., well documented and published even in evolutionists' own papers (when they happen to include something that's actually observable, repeatable, verifiable biological, scientific fact when they're telling their common descent stories and why they believe in it) that demonstrates common descent from a first life form is anti-science. Science shows that it's observable, repeatable, verifiable scientific fact that, no matter how many generations go by,
no matter how much "change in genetic composition during successive generations",
no matter how much "change in allele frequencies",
no matter how much "development of new species",
no matter how much "natural selection acting on genetic variation among individuaIs",
no matter how much "adaptation",
no matter how much "mutation",
no matter how much "speciation",
no matter how much "migration",
no matter how much "genetic drift",
no matter how much "insert other claims here"
no matter how many generations go by, ALL populations of:
fish remain fish
amphibians remain amphibians,
canines remain canines,
felines remain felines,
reptiles remain reptiles,
birds remain birds,
viruses remain viruses,
animals that never had lungs to breath air do not evolve lungs
animals that never had hearts to pump blood do not evolve hearts
animals that never had eyes to see do not evolve eyes
animals that never had brains do not evolve brains
animals that never had mouths do not evolve mouths
living things that never had a reproductive system do not evolve a reproductive system
animals that never had (insert organ here) remain living things without that organ, and so on.
There are many more such groups.
Science shows that the "common descent from a first life form" evolution (some call Darwinian evolution, some call theory of common descent) is anti-science.
Evolutionist can never address these facts - many unfortunately just fall back on ad hominem, showing how they're seem to be really about deception that's contrary to actual science.
===== Part TWO =====
Here are a few objections/claims they may bring up when they cannot address the above observable, repeatable and verifiable facts:
*Evolutionists sometimes try to claim you're against science.*
Science is fine and requires no belief.
In the entire existence of the human race: Objects drop to the ground. Observable, repeatable, verifiable, no belief required.
In the entire existence of the human race: Diseases spread. Observable, repeatable, verifiable, no belief required.
In the entire existence of the human race: All populations of: canines remain canines, fish remain fish, reptiles remain reptiles, animals that never had hearts do not evolve hearts, animals that never had digestive systems do not evolve digestive systems (or brains, or eyes, or reproductive systems and many, many more cases like these). Observable, repeatable, verifiable, no belief required.
*Evolutionists sometimes try to say they don't claim that populations of 'animals turn into other animals' over generations*
Quite the opposite. Evolutionists claim the first life form was a single cell. They claim that it is the ancestor of all living things today. That's "animals turning into other animal" over generations of mythological proportions. They claim humans, apes, rats, banana plants (50% DNA similarity to human beings) are all related - that's again "species turning into other species" of mythological proportions, claiming all life is related.
At some point reptiles did not exist in their worldview. That means they cIaim over generations some populations animals that were never reptiles 'evolved' over generations eventually into reptiles - That's "animals turning into other animals" over generations to mythological degrees.
At some point no animals had brains. This means they claim over generations some populations of animals that never had brains 'evolved' brains over generations.
Yet when called out on this some evolutionists even try to say "evolution doesn't say species turn into other species", which again is just not honest. It shows they not only know they're wrong, but they show their intent to push this falsehood anyway.
*If you point out evolutionists "populations over generations" claims, and some will dishonestly pretend you're claiming evolutionists are saying that one kind of animal 'gives birth' to another kind".* Which again is clearly deception. Science shows *populations over generations* do not do what they claim.
*Evolutionists typically imply making up reasons to believe in their common descent from a first life form belief system is the same as "observing" it,* which of course is false and is just circular reasoning. Making up beliefs ABOUT fossils or ABOUT DNA *that never happens* does not then make fossils or DNA 'evidence' or an 'observation of' of the belief you just made up about them.
*Evolutionists also typically resort to the crime analogy.* For example, since you cannot "observe" a certain crime, but can look at "evidence" for a crime, that shows we can know things happened without observing it. But what they ignore: the thing called a "crime" is already observable, repeatable, verifiable reality, so now we can look for forensic 'evidence' of some *MORE* possible crimes that no one is left alive to have observed it. By sharp contrast, what evolutionists do would be the same as giving 'evidence' for some strange new crime that's never been observed even once by the human race, and yet claim that's also an observation of this crime that never happens actually happening (for example: a "crime" of turning someone into a tree).
*Even some people factually observing something that's never happened is not science if it's not repeatable and also verifiable.* So for example, hundreds of people are witness to the fact Jesus Christ rose from the dead (or that He raised others from death), and they wrote about it. Direct observation. But it's still not science because it's *not repeatable* and not *verifiable.* There's also evidence He rose from the dead, and some have observed Him alive after the fact, but it's STILL not science that people can be raised from the dead, in spite of evidence, and in spite of it also being directly observed - because it's not *repeatable* and not *verifiable.* And so it goes with the belief of common descent from a first life form - not only is it not *repeatable,* not *verifiable,* it's not even *observable* either - which makes the resurrection far more likely to be called science before the belief of common descent from a first life form ever could. But neither of them can be called science of course.
===== Part Three =====
*Evolutionists almost always are against Christ but are teaching their religion* that goes along with their belief of common descent from a first life form - the belief of 'nothing did it - it all just happened on it's own, including life - you're just another animal related to all animals - so live how you want and you'll rest in peace when you die". But they also pass this religion off 'you are god' off as science as well.
That in mind, I implore people to re-read the gospels and forget what any church or any religion or anyone has claimed they say and sincerely consider yet again for ourselves. Judgment is coming for us all for our lifetime of sinning AND refusing God's offer to forgive and forget in the person of Jesus Christ. But religions also twist God's truth to make people think it's their religion and system of rules that makes them right with God when it's about a person: Jesus Christ, and choosing to have a relationship with Him, having a change of mind about living for ourselves and turning back towards God/ Jesus Christ to live for Him instead.
John 3 : 14-21 *_"[Jesus said] And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up [i.e., on the cross]: That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life. For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved [exposed]. But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God."_*
Live forever, friends!
and? :)
I have a question for all you Adam and Eve believers ... explain pygmy peoples? explain different skin colours? explain why asians have narrow eyes? explain neanderthal fossils? If we're all descended from Adam and Eve why do we have so many different looking races? Hmmm ... could that be adaption, which, of course, is the mechanism that leads to evolution?
1 Corinthians 1 (WEB) - 1ይ ቆረንቶስ
20: Where is the wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the lawyer of this world? Hasn't God made foolish the wisdom of this world?
21: For seeing that in the wisdom of God, the world through its wisdom didn't know God, it was God's good pleasure through the foolishness of the preaching to save those who believe.
22: For Jews ask for signs, Greeks seek after wisdom,
23: but we preach Christ crucified; a stumbling block to Jews, and foolishness to Greeks,
24: but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ is the power of God and the wisdom of God.
Amen.
Amen ♰=♥️ 🛐
amen 🙏🏽
Amen
What is that squiggly writing
This video makes my heart break for these people who are so clearly being deceived by this world. 10:20 through 13:42 is all you need to watch here to see that this community has no more definitive answer for the miracle of life than we do as believers. The major difference in these two belief systems is directly correlated to the level of pride we have in our own understanding of this universe. I was an agnostic/borderline atheist for the first 23 years of my life until I finally humbled myself and began to see the truth that there is indeed an intelligent being far beyond the capacity of our own comprehension as mere human beings. John 9:39 “Then Jesus told him, "I entered this world to render judgment--to give sight to the blind and to show those who think they see that they are blind."
tim rose I’m truly sorry that you feel this way but Christians have no reason to be “dishonest” when it comes to evangelism. What benefit would it bring to us whether or not you choose to believe in God? Ray is only seeking to spread the truth to people so they may be saved and brought into eternal life. Evolution is an extremely flawed theory and that is becoming more and more evident today through science itself. I suggest you check out the interview with biochemist Michael Behe on the new science about DNA that challenges evolution (Darwin Devolves)
Dave Littleton Michael Behe is not considered a reliable source. Watch his dismissal as a creationist during the Dover trials than outlawed intelligent design as religion. Yes, Ray is a charlatan and ridiculed as the banana man. His editing and stupidity of his questions was laughable. There is no such thing as a kind!
tim rose you say he is “not considered” a reliable source, and yet what does that really mean? He is not considered reliable by whose standard? The evolutionist community? Well of course he isn’t because his research refutes everything that they stand for and believe in when it comes to the origin of life. It is actually laughable to me how arrogant a person must be to claim that their worldview around evolution is superior to that of intelligent design. Scientists don’t even have a clue what 95% of our universe truly consists of (aka dark energy and dark matter) but we somehow think it’s reasonable to entirely rule out the possibility of a divine creator. Believe what you may my friend, but I pray that one day you might let go of your pride just as I did so God can reveal himself to you
tim rose well I guess we can agree to disagree on this topic. Wishing you all the best
Evolutionary Biology and the Bible Genetics and Darwinism are independent ideologies. I never made an argument against genes being real
This man is a savage. 😂 using their own words against themselves
If by savage, you mean lacking in proper arguments and relying on false premises and emotion; then you might be on to something
Real World Games how do you know they are false? They couldn’t even answer a question that is necessary to evolution. He said something like how come fish aren’t not fish anymore or something like that.
Anders Norrvik what dishonesty?
Anders Norrvik where does he say that?
He just does not understand evolution
I love how you make people think as you are questioning them. You have quite a gift from God. 🙏
He is a liar from Australia. He lies about real science. Life evolves, whether there is a god or not. The evidence is quite clear.
@@ethelredhardrede1838 what are humans going to evolve into?
@@debbiemartin2026
How am I supposed to know? There is no direction to the process of evolution besides survival.
Besides which we have increasing levels of control of our genes. Which takes us out the loop or at least should do so. It it doesn't it will be because we killed ourselves.
@@ethelredhardrede1838 our genetic material is breaking down not getting better. That refutes evolution.
@@debbiemartin2026
So a false claim you made up refutes evolution. No. If you mean humans, its not breaking down. Natural selection removes bad changes. Creationists never deal with the whole process. Just a bit at a time to say it cannot happen because, they know what they are talking about.
By the way Jeanson, the guy pushing that, lied to you. He pretends that natural selection does not exist, just like you.
Oh post did not show except in the notification. Likely the same for this, but I will check and break things down.
I got converted by this, thank you....
Converted to what Dev ?
Theism or Evolutionism/Atheism ?
@@misanthropytilldeath7005 theism
@@devshah2939 Nice to hear Dev 👍
Jesus died for us sinners. God speaks through the Bible.
Praise God.
2:11 "it makes more sense than any religion"
ok so you are telling me that Fish + time = Human?
it's less logical than God + magical powers = everything
How come?
@Jnr Burns Lol, It was a joke
But evolution is still extremely illogical, just use your brain lol
@Jnr Burns What truth of the matter?
@Jaren Groves how do you know god is real?
@@abigailm.7196 have you even seen how evolution works? Why do most animals have the same bone structure? Why are we slowly loosing our molars? Because we don’t need them and we had them in a time where our ancestors used them. It’s not blindly believing if the evidence is there and yes we don’t know all about the world and that’s why we are still learning but simply believing in a being that created everything and knows everything you do or think is blindly believing
Lol she took away her reply
If the scientific method can't be applied then it isn't science.
It is science. We can observe evolution through evidence. Bacteria speciation is proof of descent with modified, it is observable even within a human lifetime.
@Jaren Groves can you first define what a kind is? Is it a species? A kingdom? Genus? What is it? Nobody seems to know what kind means, probably because it is meant to be vague.
@Jaren Groves no that is not specific enough because a cat and a dog are in the same kingdom, while a toad and a chicken are in different kingdoms (amphibians and birds). You are going to have to be more specific than that.
@Jaren Groves okay so I'll assume you mean a kingdom.
I change of kingdom or "kind" is not possible. All birds share a common ancestor from reptiles, in fact this fossil was named Archaeopteryx. So if you observe it's bone structure, it is similar to the reptiles of that time period (millions of years ago) but also shows characteristics of modern birds, (ie. Feathers, extremely light bones, and primitive wing appendages.) It is safe to conclude that based on the genotyping/phenotyping of this dinosaur, that this represents prehistoric reptiles diverging into what we recognize to today as birds. Even today, we know that birds diverged from reptiles through the use of sequenckng whole genomes of bird/reptile dna and we can see that they are consistently more related than ANY OTHER LIVING ORGANISMS.
Hopefully I answered the question? Maybe anti-evolution people should find a better argument against evolution.
To clarify what I said in the beginning, a change of kingdom is not possible, it simply cannot happen in one generation ( or even thousands!) It take millions of years for the divergences to be noticed. Such is the case for birds and reptiles.
7:44
Ray:"So what have the bacteria become?"
Woman: "A new kind of bacteria."
Ray: "Still bacteria."
Woman: Understandable, have a nice day
What has this plant become?
A new plant.
Understandable.
There's so much variety. Just because bacteria are all microscopic doesn't make them all one kind lmao. Lazy arguing
@Edward The Booble Define theory.
@@surrealcereal948 You can't expect someone to officially proclaim it as an evidence unless proven unanimously, that's why in every research project there's aways an hypothesis that may or may not answer the theories. And so basically to correct your ideas, a theory is considered a prediction, or an inferred statement to be exact. It could either be supported or denied that's why it's STILL a theory today due to what professional scientists may call it "The Missing Link".
Though mostly, researchers are always been so bias with their research just to prove a point that's not there. Take it from me to be exact, a researcher working on robotics. The theory of evolution had always been so bias during it's rise due to many "explorers" that considered a random bone or teeth of a mammal as an evidence to the theory just to prove a point and not just intellectual honesty. (Arkell, I.E., 2015 upon her supported statements of "The Nebraska Man")
In 1843 for example, Bouch de Perthes found a man made flint-tool and instantly took it as an "evidence" even though he only claimed the tool and not the remained skeletons of a primitive man.
@@surrealcereal948 Its a shame how common place the misunderstanding of the word "theory" is. It doesn't mean belief like many of these people think.
@@surrealcereal948 Genuinely, I did not visit or proclaimed any creation articles. As usual, bias between intellectual honesty and are just there to prove a point. You can't expect a mind of an evolutionist to have a sincere intellectual honesty rather than evolution. (Lew, 2013)
Previous Paleontologists discovering the southern ape "lucy" AUTOMATICALLY ASSUMED that she came from an evolutionary timeline between apes and humans and they AUTOMATICALLY PROCLAIMED an hypothesis that she is the "missing link".
May our dear father GOD the 1 and only true God continue to protect and bless you Ray Comfort. Your faith is powerful & much appreciated. Never stop doing GOD'S work. God bless you now&forever.
GOD bless you too...❤️❤️❤️❤️
no
I’m confused. If God is the one and only true god. Then what does that make Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit?
@@abdelll9737 That is his forms. The Leader, the messenger and the Provider
Oh well maybe he forgot all those poor children suffering from hunger and decease. All of those people that have died from covid too. But he will protect Ray then everything is good. Sure.
I belive there is a creator because there is creation...👍✔
Look around trees oceans animals..🤔 thats evidence of creation..
I personally have experienced the unseen supernatural in my own life , so i only will speak for myself , i know
, not beLIEve there's a creator
That makes no sense ,, ''' demonstrate a creator first ''
Hmm . , so by your logic not being able to identify excatly who build what , doesn't mean or prove anything, there are many structures in the world that we aren't sure who built them ? So what does that prove other than you don't know who created them.??
@@shawndamkani6833 Calling it "creation" makes your reasoning circular since you're presupposing a creator. The fact that things exist does not prove they were created; it just shows they have an origin which may or may not be conscious.
@ Dino Hall you right , i cannot prove who created a rock , but the fact it's here begs the question where did it come from?
@@shawndamkani6833 Exactly, the question is "where did it come from?" And where it came from is not necessarily a creator. A "creator" must be conscious, and we have many examples of rocks being formed by unconscious forces.
How does nothingness start?."
"We don't know"
RAY COMFORT WHY ARE YOU SO FASCINATED IN ATHEISM ????? And EVOLUTION ?????
"So they're still bacteria?"
"Well of course."
"So they're still finches?"
"Well of course."
"So they're still fish?"
"Well of course.
Exactly. Ray asks for a change of kind as they always claim, like some populations of fish 'evolving' over generations eventually into amphibians, or some populations of amphibians 'evolving' over generations eventually into reptiles and so on. Or populations of animals that never had (hearts, brains, eyes, digestive systems, reproductive systems and more) 'evolving' such things over generations. They never can. They just cite what only shows yet again what common descent from a first life form evolutionists claim is science is anti-science.
The bottom line is the topic of the origin of all biological diversity is beyond the scope of science as beliefs, and reasons to believe in it, are all anyone can bring to the table.
Here's what *is* science: A.k.a., well documented and published even in evolutionists' own papers (when they happen to include something that's actually observable, repeatable, verifiable biological, scientific fact when they're telling their common descent stories and why they believe in it) that demonstrates common descent from a first life form is anti-science. Science shows that it's observable, repeatable, verifiable scientific fact that, no matter how many generations go by,
no matter how much "change in genetic composition during successive generations",
no matter how much "change in allele frequencies",
no matter how much "development of new species",
no matter how much "natural selection acting on genetic variation among individuals",
no matter how much "adaptation",
no matter how much "mutation",
no matter how much "speciation",
no matter how much "migration",
no matter how much "genetic drift",
no matter how much "insert other claims here"
no matter how many generations go by, ALL populations of:
fish remain fish
amphibians remain amphibians,
canines remain canines,
felines remain felines,
reptiles remain reptiles,
birds remain birds,
viruses remain viruses,
animals that never had lungs to breath air do not evolve lungs
animals that never had hearts to pump blood do not evolve hearts
animals that never had eyes to see do not evolve eyes
animals that never had brains do not evolve brains
animals that never had mouths do not evolve mouths
living things that never had a reproductive system do not evolve a reproductive system
animals that never had (insert organ here) remain living things without that organ, and so on.
There are many more such groups.
Science shows that the "common descent from a first life form" evolution (some call Darwinian evolution, some call theory of common descent) is anti-science.
Evolutionist can never address these facts - many then just fall back on ad hominem, showing how they're really about deception that's contrary to actual science.
Evolutionists typically deceive and pretend making up reasons to believe in their common descent from a first life form belief system is the same as "observing" it, which just goes to show how they're just about deception.
Evolutionists also typically deceive and try to pretend that since you cannot "observe" a certain crime, but can look at "evidence" for a crime, that shows we can know things happened without observing it. But what they hope no one notices: the thing called a "crime" is observable, repeatable, verifiable reality, so now we can look for forensic 'evidence' of some *more* crimes that no one is around to have observed. What they do is the same as giving 'evidence' for something that's never been observed even once by the human race, and yet claim that's also an observation of this belief that newer happens, which is just more deception.
Hundreds, if not thousands, of people are witness to the fact Jesus Christ rose from the dead, along with others being raised from the dead, and they wrote about it. Direct observation. But it's still not science because it's not *repeatable* and not *verifiable.* There's also evidence He rose from the dead, but it's STILL not science that people can be raised from the dead, in spite of evidence, and in spite of it also being directly observed - because it's not *repeatable* and not *verifiable.* And so it goes with the belief of common descent from a first life form - not only is it not *repeatable,* not *verifiable,* it's not even *observable* either - which makes the resurrection far more likely to be called science before the belief of common descent from a first life form ever could.
That aside, I implore people to re-read the gospels and forget what any church or any religion or anyone has claimed they say and sincerely consider yet again for ourselves. Judgment is coming for us all for our lifetime of sinning AND refusing God's offer to forgive and forget in the person of Jesus Christ. But religions also twist God's truth to make people think it's their religion and system of rules that makes them right with God when it's about a person: Jesus Christ, and choosing to have a relationship with Him, having a change of mind about living for the world and turning back towards God/ Jesus Christ.
John 3 : 14-21 *_"[Jesus said] And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up [i.e., on the cross]: That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life. For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved [exposed]. But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God."_*
+ *ForumLight*
*"Science shows that it's observable, repeatable ... no matter how much "adaptation" ... fish remain fish ... etc."* Science cannot show that fish* always remain fish, canines remain canines, or any of that until it observes every single lineage of fish that's ever existed. Can you find a comprehensive study on every fish that's ever existed? Can you show us a scientific study that concludes that fish always remain fish that _doesn't_ base it on the fact that we just haven't observed the opposite yet?
Science isn't "We haven't observed this happening, therefore it's _observable, repeatable and verifiable_ that it can't happen.". That's the problem we're having with your comment. You're taking an absence of observation for evidence of absence, despite the other evidence to the positive. Yes, evolution requires some things that would otherwise seem overwhelmingly counter-intuitive, but it's done the heavy lifting to back it up.
Science is limited by our level of technology and not what we can directly observe. We can't directly observe the Roman Empire but we know it existed because we can observe what remains of it - ie. records, coins, cities, etc. Likewise, we can't directly observe dinosaurs evolving into chickens, but we can indirectly observe it by looking at what's left - ie. fossils, chicken DNA. This is how science come up with the reasoning behind its conclusions and, when it's done properly, it's as good a reason to believe it as anything else.
Here's what *is* science: no matter how many millions of years,
no matter how many rocks there are,
no matter how quickly they're moving,
no matter what shape they are
no two rocks will ever attract each other together,
no rocks with build themselves into a planetoid,
no rock will shape itself into a sphere,
no rock will attract other rocks into orbit.
That's the sort of logic you're working with. It all seems fine, because it correlates with 99% of observations anyone has ever made. You or I will never see two stone float together or change shape, and they couldn't even make that happen in a lab. Therefore, it's all anti-science.
Except none of that holds up given what we know what we do about how planets are formed. Rock attrition can happen by gravity and electrostatic forces, building up to small planetoids and, eventually, full-on planets. We know this through research, and the evidence is strong enough that we can confidently disregard what would otherwise seem like a common sense conclusion.
Science can tell us that, for all the hundreds of years of study, it hasn't observed a fish becoming something else. That's some pretty strong evidence that it can't happen, and I think it's what you're getting at, but it's not absolute, because it isn't comprehensive.
Of course, the fact that it isn't comprehensive opens the possibility that it _can_ happen and that we just haven't seen it happen. Cue the theory of evolution. It provides a _method_ for how a fish can become something else. It also give us observational evidence of the same process happening on a small scale unobstructed, and it even explains why we couldn't observe anything more substantial in the first place. It, too, is imperfect, but it can be backed-up, and it's the best we've got right now.
* a fish in this example being a primitive organism that looked like what we'd call a fish (In fact, these early creatures weren't genetically the same as modern fish. In fact, the biological classification they fall under _would_ remain the same for all its billions of years of descendants, despite the obvious fact that its descendants are physically and genetically distinct from it and their cousins.)
Even if someone were to take the time to go through your brick wall of a copy-paste comment, wading against the current of what sounds kinda reasonable in isolation but nevertheless is at odds with all of modern science, you'd just continue posting it on other threads (again). Why bother with that user's response when no one in any other thread is going to see it? All that matters is that I'm right!
Flying elephants are a good example of a negative that can be proven without an exhaustive study. We can just look at the anatomy. It's the same with evolution. If you want to disprove it, give us a proof. Look at the elephant's anatomy.
There are claims of observing Jesus rise from the dead like there are hundreds of people claim to have witness Bigfoot. Eyewitness testimony is unreliable even when it isn't thousands of years old.
_Don't just continue to insist science shows this and that without backing yourself up as if lack of direct observation is enough. It isn't. Science has shown these things to be feasible through other means._
@@Demiligne good little Science gatekeeper. Keep on believin'!
@@bd1zzl3If you want to prove your God exists, you're gonna have to do a helluva lot better than a zinger you think is clever to prove your case. You can call the number 2 'fat' all you want, 1+1 is still gonna equal 2.
@@chrishaven1489 if that made any sense it might have been worth the time to type. I don't have anything to prove to anyone, enjoy your time.
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."
- Albert Einstein
@Martin Jansen Prove evolution.
@@lordvader3542
He cant
Quote-mining doesn't really mean anything when it's out of context.
@dominionn09 He might not be able to prove evolution, but that doesn't make it any less of an observable fact that you can easily prove to yourself if you're honest.
@@Arena1999
I believe in evolution and God. I don't believe that all we see, hear, taste and touch are a result of an explosion. If you're honest with yourself, you'll agree
@
Well you may have more things to worry about than existence. Thats reading comprehension.
Ray Comfort God bless you brother
I think he is now our grandpa
Good video, but it still annoys me that people don't know words. Using "God" as a cuss word is not "taking the Lord's name in vain." Doing something in vain means to do something, knowing it won't accomplish anything. Praying to God to murder your enemies is taking God's name in vain.
At least, that's what it meant when it was written. It's only more recently that "in vain" became synonymous with disrespect.
Why would u want to use God’s name as a cuss word anyways
@@classified3752 "God" isn't God's name. I've never heard a single person use God's name as a cuss word. Most people don't even know His name.
You had them all rethinking their beliefs, I pray that they continue to do their own reading. We need more followers of Christ doing this.
Didn't he, amen and praise God.
Bill D 😂😂😂😂
Einstein: "In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me for the support of such views."
Vladimir Mladenov unfortunate that a man as smart as Einstein couldn’t recognise the difference between design and nature.
"I never said most of the quotes attributed to me on the Internet." - Albert Einstein
Einstein had a limited mind ? you say ?
Vladimir Mladenov A handwritten missive by Albert Einstein known as the “God letter” fetched almost $3m at auction in 2018. In it Einstein says: “The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive, legends which are nevertheless pretty childish.”
So what ! ....what's your point ?
The way God works through you is amazing!! Thank you for spreading the Good News! Praise God!!!!!
Actually, science and medicine itself proves there is a Creator.
I believe in the divine Creator, but could you please elaborate? I don't think that athiests will be convinced by this statement and I don't quite understand how either.
Let God be true if every men has to be proven a liar!!!!!!!!!!
@@Facts-Over-Feelings What?! No it wasn't
lol. Not that it matters but there is no "if" in that quote from Romans 3.... Every man is a liar and God is true.
@@rwatson2609 it does matter! Don't change a dot or a tittle!
We actually share 50% of DNA w/ bananas and 97% w/ Chimpanzees. This isn’t disputable, it’s a proven fact. This shows a high possibility of a common ancestor. If creatism is true, then these DNA coding similarities presented by god have got the be the biggest troll ever.
A A Actually, if you payed attention in biology class, you’d hear about genetic similarities. It was Stephen Woodford.
Ray I wish you’d randomly come across my Mum and Brother sometime. They can’t hear these things from me, it just turns into an argument.
Same for me sadly
amalia amalia think the saddest part about it from my personal situation is my brother is a PHD Biologist at the best university in the UK, if he can understand these things and make those internal adjustments, he could be a powerful voice for our community.
I find the same predicament with my mom.
Wait so you don’t believe in evolution?
Solomon King Oftenimes it's hard for family members to receive certain truths from other family members. One option is to show them these types of videos. Another option is to pray that God Jehovah will send anointed laborers across their paths to minister to them.
I'll rely on my faith in God over the blind faith in man.
I love when Ray asked for observable evidence and they all just stood there awkwardly.
Yeah he even left the people with PHDS speechless
Well it would be more awkward trying to prove an invisible, untestable magical sky fairy exists.
@@SimplyGun for example
@@michaelshell331 theres a creator as its a scientific impossibility for the universe to crate itself
@lehach92 Good question .Christianity because it is the most historically accurate and it made prophecies that came true
People always ask questions like "why God made evil", or "why God made hell?". We need to talk all day long to describe why and at the end, nothing will change. But if you truly ask and seek God, something will change.
evil exists because of our free will. talking from rather pessimistic view we are a big experiment to see what creatures with this level of intelligence will do if given the optio to do what ever
In their wisdom they become fools. Love this. Thank you.
Lol yeah that Steve jobs guy, Bill gates & the others are all fools. Hah
@Edward The Booble Why are you so angry? Like literally every single comment I read, you commented mad at a person because of their opposite views.
Yeah right, im the one before but Now The truth set me free❤
@@anewcreation4667 Because some of us are (rightfully) really sick of people believing in the dumbest things imaginable. Sometimes it's pretty scary to see how dumb people truly are. Science is the way to go, not faith.
@@idontwantahandlethough Yeah yeah yeah and I’ll continue to stick with faith.
“‘Now hear this, O foolish and senseless people, Who have eyes but do not see; Who have ears but do not hear.”
Jeremiah 5:21 NASB
I agree that sometimes people will not want to see logical evidences on the basis of actual faith in a lie and not faith in a scientist
It's incredible how bright these people are but they can't accept the evidence in front of them
@@jennypraise4960 I agree, the cameraman cannot understand the evidence that the people are giving him, he does not understand that observable does not have to be (observing a change in specie, that is ridiculous). Observable evidence lead to the logical conclusion. The camera man does not get it and it is sad because the people he is questioning wont be able to answer such dumb questions.
@@AZ-ts1qy I think you missed the point. Evolutionists mock creationists because we believe in an unseen creator and hence our understanding of creation requires faith, yet evolutionists disregard the fact that their understanding of Evolution also requires faith and hence makes it a religion rather than science which needs to be observed.
If you have the answers to the questions or a better and solid theory that debunks God, we are all ears
@@Luxefacile Evolution theory is based on observable evidence, unlike religion which is based on one book or Religious Authority only, more like a Clan.
I really cannot comprehend how it is a religion, it has a divers collection of observable evidence that makes the scientific theory applicable and therefore possible to conclude. Exactly like the THEORY of gravity. You can see things fall but who says it is gravity, there is absolutely no evidence for it, but mathematics and other indirect observation and understandings.
That man in the video omit those conclusion, he is being fallacious in that way, strawman if I am not mistaken.
I find that man very dishonest, because of people like this we still have Flat Earthers as well. It is a WordPlay.
When we look at a scientific theory, you can basically build up your own and see if it holds the road. It is Logical.
There is so much in science that we can observe and REPEAT, UNLIKE Religion.
It is like saying Atheism is a Religion or a Philosophy or worldview. They cannot be something because they are just the absence of the other things and thus nothing.
I would be glad to continue this conversation and hope I am not being harsh.
It's so sad that there are still people who think that evolution is not real.
Hello. It's so sad that people think common descent from a first cell is real. Ask them to cite a reproducible case of population of living things that never had brains 'evolving' brains over generations. Same for eyes, or ears, or hearts, or lungs, or digestive systems and so much more. They can't because it's contrary to all of science, all of biology and all of reality. Be not deceived, friend. When we face God for a lifetime of lying, stealing, lusting, hating, blaspheming and more, it won't work to say "well how was I supposed to know?". I implore people to re-read the gospels and forget what any religion or church has claimed they say.
what do you mean by evolution? if by evolution you mean adaptation/speciation within each family, nobody hasa problem with this, if you mean common ancestry between families, that is a heavily outdated idea from 19th century western europe that has no basis on reality
didn’t you watch the video?
@@lookherekook1258Bruh did you think the video includes any kind of 'sense'?
I have a question for all you Adam and Eve believers ... explain pygmy peoples? explain different skin colours? explain why asians have narrow eyes? explain neanderthal fossils? If we're all descended from Adam and Eve why do we have so many different looking races? Hmmm ... could that be adaption, which, of course, is the mechanism that leads to evolution?
Evolution teachers- 'Did God really say?'
Me- 'Yes, God really did say!"
Praise God
Me too cause is illogical than nothing.
Bacteria are still bacteria. They've never "evolved" into a more complex life form, not into a higher kingdom. Everything looks stagnant to me.
@@quasimobius Yes,bacteria and multicellular life have a common ancestor(in the first ever cell),that's what evolution means,not things completly changing,but life becoming more complex,changing a little bit over time.
Edit:Evolution at least makes sense,unlike creationism,also do you believe in the 6000 year old earth?
Harry ,just Harry how does that make more sense than creation? You can’t observably proof evolution. Evolution is a belief created and accepted by people who simply DON’T want to believe in God.
@@globalcoupledances lol, 7 million? That's not human.
God created humans with the ability to think and reason, and God expects us to use that gift He has given us. Remember that at its core the goal of reason and logic is to find truth, and Jesus made the bold claim that He is truth (John 14:6), so reason and logic should lead us to Jesus every time.
It would’ve been good if Ray also asked them when asked about the neighbour and dog drowning scenario, if what if it was them in the water drowning, how would they feel if someone saved the dog over them... it’s easy for people to think someone else has less worth, but when it’s them, guaranteed they place a higher value on their life.
I was thinking that as well. I am sure they would rethink their answer.
Absolutely!!
Yea I remember the first time I watched this video I was shocked. But then I realized a lot of people think like that. Very sad.
Yes I do love dogs and I don't love my neighbors, but I would save my neighbor first and then I will save the dog. First love God then love your neighbor is what the bijbel says (that is the second and is just as important says Jesus), but I live in a bad neighborhood and I hope that my neighbors will think the same way about it if I am drowning. I do know that they love there dog, so they could not be real bad people.
This is what Jesus says in Matthew 22 vers 34-40 34 Hearing that Jesus had silenced the Sadducees, the Pharisees got together. 35 One of them, an expert in the law, tested him with this question: 36 “Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?”
37 Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’[c] 38 This is the first and greatest commandment. 39 And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’[d] 40 All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.”
So save your Neighbor first, and after that if you got time left to can do it save the dog.
Thank you for this video. What are the floating blurred-out squares on the screen?
To keep peoples identities hidden?
the best part about this is that these people will probably think of this every so often and ponder on it.
And notice that Ray was gaslighting them by making up a load of nonsense.
@Jax Callum
" but Ray has convinced me that there may be God. "
By pushing nonsense.
" what if there was no evolution? "
Actual research shows that there is.
" What if something else happened instead of big bang and evolution"
What if apples were oranges and Ray didn't lie? Oh there might have something that is not quite what BB theory is today but it would have to similar to produce the evidence we have. As for evolution, that is part of reality, how is theory, and natural selection fits the evidence.
"but let's not blindly follow everything."
Good, right idea, now stop blindly following Ray. I am not going blind, I am going more than ample evidence. Ray just plain lied about the BB, its NOT everything from nothing because there is no such thing as nothing in our universe. Its human concept, not a part of reality.
Let me get you started in your journey to reality.
How evolution works:
First step in the process.
Mutations happen - There are many kinds of them from single hit changes to the duplication of entire genomes, the last happens in plants not vertebrates. The most interesting kind is duplication of genes which allows one duplicate to do the old job and the new to change to take on a different job. There is ample evidence that this occurs and this is the main way that information is added to the genome. This can occur much more easily in sexually reproducing organisms due their having two copies of every gene in the first place.
Second step in the process, the one Creationist pretend doesn't happen when they claim evolution is only random.
Mutations are the raw change in the DNA. Natural selection carves the information from the environment into the DNA. Much like a sculptor carves an shape into the raw mass of rock. Selection is what makes it information in the sense Creationists use. The selection is by the environment. ALL the evidence supports this.
Natural Selection - mutations that decrease the chances of reproduction are removed by this. It is inherent in reproduction that a decrease in the rate of successful reproduction due to a gene that isn't doing the job adequately will be lost from the gene pool. This is something that cannot not happen. Some genes INCREASE the rate of successful reproduction. Those are inherently conserved. This selection is by the environment, which also includes other members of the species, no outside intelligence is required for the environment to select out bad mutations or conserve useful mutations.
The two steps of the process is all that is needed for evolution to occur. Add in geographical or reproductive isolation and speciation will occur.
This is a natural process. No intelligence is needed for it occur. It occurs according to strictly local, both in space and in time, laws of chemistry and reproduction.
There is no magic in it. It is as inevitable as hydrogen fusing in the Sun. If there is reproduction and there is variation then there will be evolution.
Some books to get you started:
Why evolution is true - Jerry A. Coyne
THIS BOOK IN PARTICULAR to see just how messy and undesigned the chemistry of life is.
Herding Hemingway's Cats: Understanding how Our Genes Work
Book by Kat Arney
This shows new organs evolving from previous organs. Limbs from fins.
Your Inner Fish
Book by Neil Shubin
Wonderful life : the Burgess Shale and nature of history / Stephen Jay Gould
Life on a Young Planet: The First Three Billions Years of Evolution on Earth Andrew H, Knoll
Now evolution is a lot simpler to understand that Big Bang cosmology but if you want books on that I have a few for that as well. Wikipedia covers both quite well and has links to more dense information. Ray make his living promoting his religion learning critical thinking will protect you from snowjobs and fact free nonsense like what Ray uses. A Creationist favorite these days is to simply create a false version of how science works and then lie that if you cannot see something happen today then it never happened and their god did it.
Wikipedia - Critical thinking
Critical thinking is the analysis of facts to form a judgment.[1] The subject is complex, and several different definitions exist, which generally include the rational, skeptical, unbiased analysis, or evaluation of factual evidence. Critical thinking is self-directed, self-disciplined, self-monitored, and self-corrective thinking.[2] It presupposes assent to rigorous standards of excellence and mindful command of their use. It entails effective communication and problem-solving abilities as well as a commitment to overcome native egocentrism[3][4] and sociocentrism.
Ethelred Hardrede
@Axle Parker
They will never learn about reality if they are only exposed to silly nonsense.
@@ethelredhardrede1838 an entire dissertation of “its likely, it’s possible and open to discussion and much debate”. Evolution that claims evidence yet none has been provided. This video thoroughly exposes the absurdity that is evolution. Wikipedia: Uncertainty
@@warrr_machine At least they are willing to consider a different perspective. Unlike most religious people. They fall out with everyone, even those that have a belief in God, but a slightly different take on it. And no one has ever accosted me in the street to drone on about evolution.
God is the intelligent designer. The painting never questions the artist.
+ *james* And yet we humans do. Might go to show how we're not so similar to paintings.
@@Demiligne There's reasons as to why it's questioned, I don't know if you've ever read the Bible but it's said that Satan fills people with doubts of God, for all we know, he could have fed Darwin the theory about Evolution without revealing himself to start this whole Evolution vs God argument.
Why do fossils exist then
@@tylerscampinghuntingandsur4957 thats the most stupid thing i have ever heard.
"Satan was the one who tricked Darwin into coming up with evolution"
Was he also the one who planted fossils and was also the one who gave us all the other evidence to support it?
You guys seriously come up with the most stupid arguments to back your beliefs
Humans are not paintings lmao. You are PRESUPPOSING design where none shows or were ever needed to explain anything.
Evolution: Probably+Probably=Fact?
Indeed. The bottom line is the topic of the origin of all biological diversity is beyond the scope of science as beliefs, and reasons to believe in it, are all anyone can bring to the table.
Here's what *is* science: A.k.a., well documented and published even in evolutionists' own papers (when they happen to include something that's actually observable, repeatable, verifiable biological, scientific fact when they're telling their common descent stories and why they believe in it) that demonstrates common descent from a first life form is anti-science. Science shows that it's observable, repeatable, verifiable scientific fact that, no matter how many generations go by,
no matter how much "change in genetic composition during successive generations",
no matter how much "change in allele frequencies",
no matter how much "development of new species",
no matter how much "natural selection acting on genetic variation among individuals",
no matter how much "adaptation",
no matter how much "mutation",
no matter how much "speciation",
no matter how much "migration",
no matter how much "genetic drift",
no matter how much "insert other claims here"
no matter how many generations go by, ALL populations of:
fish remain fish
amphibians remain amphibians,
canines remain canines,
felines remain felines,
reptiles remain reptiles,
birds remain birds,
viruses remain viruses,
animals that never had lungs to breath air do not evolve lungs
animals that never had hearts to pump blood do not evolve hearts
animals that never had eyes to see do not evolve eyes
animals that never had brains do not evolve brains
animals that never had mouths do not evolve mouths
living things that never had a reproductive system do not evolve a reproductive system
animals that never had (insert organ here) remain living things without that organ, and so on.
There are many more such groups.
Science shows that the "common descent from a first life form" evolution (some call Darwinian evolution, some call theory of common descent) is anti-science.
Evolutionist can never address these facts - many then just fall back on ad hominem, showing how they're really about deception that's contrary to actual science.
Evolutionists typically deceive and pretend making up reasons to believe in their common descent from a first life form belief system is the same as "observing" it, which just goes to show how they're just about deception.
Evolutionists also typically deceive and try to pretend that since you cannot "observe" a certain crime, but can look at "evidence" for a crime, that shows we can know things happened without observing it. But what they hope no one notices: the thing called a "crime" is observable, repeatable, verifiable reality, so now we can look for forensic 'evidence' of some *more* crimes that no one is around to have observed. What they do is the same as giving 'evidence' for something that's never been observed even once by the human race, and yet claim that's also an observation of this belief that newer happens, which is just more deception.
That aside, I implore people to re-read the gospels and forget what any church or any religion or anyone has claimed they say and sincerely consider yet again for ourselves. Judgment is coming for us all for our lifetime of sinning AND refusing God's offer to forgive and forget in the person of Jesus Christ. But religions also twist God's truth to make people think it's their religion and system of rules that makes them right with God when it's about a person: Jesus Christ, and choosing to have a relationship with Him, having a change of mind about living for the world and turning back towards God/ Jesus Christ.
John 3 : 14-21 *_"[Jesus said] And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up [i.e., on the cross]: That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life. For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved [exposed]. But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God."_*
Just because it takes a long time doesn’t mean it’s not true. Show me some hard evidence of God that isn’t personal experience
Great point
@JacksonI mean most of those happened hundreds of years ago. The only one with evidence had one scientist do one experiment, which is dumb as he could have made a mistake or he could have just lied. Look up pictures of watermelons in the renaissance. They have lots more seeds and much less flesh. The reason watermelons look how they do today is because humans specifically bred them for more flesh and less seeds. In fact this can be seen for almost all fruit you see in a supermarket. This isn’t evolution happening naturally, as in the wild having more seeds and less flesh would be an advantage, but it is proof that mutations occur and it is possible for species to evolve. And if this is true, then it makes perfect sense that if an animal has a mutation, such as a distant relative of a giraffe having a slightly longer neck, or a distant relative of a human growing a slightly more intelligent brain, then they will get more food, or become a more attractive mate, and then those traits will pass down and more and more of the population will have longer necks or better brains until the other ones die out because they can’t get enough food. That’s without giving any pictures of fossils or any form of evidence. Evolution is common sense, and that’s why almost everyone that gets information from anywhere except the bible knows that evolution happened.
@@zacknight5960 does not a piece of art speak volumes about the artist,? Look around, creation speaks volumes about the Creator.
For the record evolution is a pretty intelligent form of design. I don't how many of your favourite inventors have created things that literally build themselves.
But common descent from a first cell 'evolution' is not - it's contrary to all of biology. It's the belief that populations of living things that never had brains 'evolved' brains into existence over generations. Same for ears, eyes, hearts, etc. They can't cite any of it, which proves this is contrary to all of biology/science.
@@ForumLight Do you copy/paste this same thing in every comment?
“If the Good News we preach is hidden behind a veil, it is hidden only from people who are perishing. Satan, who is the god of this world, has blinded the minds of those who don’t believe. They are unable to see the glorious light of the Good News. They don’t understand this message about the glory of Christ, who is the exact likeness of God.”
2 Corinthians 4:3-4 NLT
I KNOW GOD CREATED EVERYTHING!!!!
Wrong. Do you have evidence? Don't say the Bible. You know the Bible is a book of lies, right? Have you ever seen a talking snake? Wake up.
@@ultraviolet.catastrophe I have evidence of the making of the universe of GOD and do you not see that it is very beautiful very well made if it happened in bigbang theory the world should be very close if there is a beginning then there is an end and if the universe is good someone made it but GOD designed it. and you can imagine the right distances of the stars and planets if we have the ability to think and make paintings so we can design it and that is also how God made the universe if we can design so also of GOD and if in bigbang theory from all its called accident is there an accident the result is not good right why do we have love for ourselves ,we have love for others we have the ability to think and why did you say that the bible is a lie and it is written in the bible that the world is really round and that life is in the blood that things was discovered before they developed the technologies to get out of the earth and that NASA discovered that the earth is round
@@ultraviolet.catastrophe why did the scientists say that the water came from the meteor but why not on another planet why only the earth has it possible that no meteor fell on mars and why our planet is so beautiful and I have discovered billionaire people is preparing for the destruction of the world maybe they are afraid and no one can live in the wrath of God he is very angry with us because we have done many bad things and you are one of them you do not recognize God he is angry because other people do not believe in him and do you know the scientist then who discovered the telescope he believed in God then and life was still peaceful then there were very few bad events and events like hurricanes, wildfires did not continue but now they continue. because God is angry with us now and JESUS is coming for the servants of God and the DEVIL is preparing and the things that God has given him the intellect are attracted by the devil so that they do not recognize God to look at to them that the bible is just fiction so that they make discoveries and the devil does that the scientists that they believe in their intellect the devil does that so they just ignore all the works of GOD in the universe and the devil does this so that he can be with someone in hell so that he can be with them suffer there the devil is not in hell he is here in our world to sow evil the devil is also smart so he can fool you so he can harm you and why do you really want evidence that if there is a God he should show up in the BIBLE so that "blessed are the people who serve me even when they do not see me" and why did you say that the bible is wrong they did noah's ark on mountain ararat in 2012
@@jhadelhernandez6454 i hope you were joking. Cause if you weren't, your evidence sounds so dumb.
@@khacthinhnguyen17 I'm not joking I'm telling the truth all I said is truth duhh
Jesus is Lord. You’re welcome ❤️
In case there is anybody still sane looking for a clear answer that has been observed based on fossils collected, it'd be the divergence of the Archaeopteryx. It was an organism with reptile and avian characteristics. It diverged around 150 million years ago to create the family tree of birds, which are considered avians.
This divergence in particular is very good because unlike the evolution from the whole Pakicetus to whale stuff, the offspring of the Archaeopteryx had to change much quicker due to hastily altering landscapes. This created an obvious difference in species.
In this case of evolution, the annoying interviewer cannot say "but it's still an bird" since the Archaeopteryx was observed to clearly be more dinosaur. Even then, denying the whole Darwin's finch theory was stretching it, Christians. The reason why the finches were "still birds" are because there wasn't a supervolcano eruption that selected offspring that generated scales and were heat resistant.
The point I'm getting to is that everything is proof to Darwinian evolution, it's just that everyday change is so small that these awful people have resorted to hiding behind the word "adaptability" (which also proves Darwinian evolution regardless).
If there is anybody angrily replying to me that "it was never observed happening, it was so long ago" or "you are just blindly believing what is hypothesized" I have a question; do you have any bones from angels or any observable phenomenon that proves the existence of divine beings, whom ended up creating new species? It might be a silly question, but at this point every question Christians ask are silly.
Hello. Common descent from a single cell evolution is the claim that populations of living things that never had brains 'evolved' brains over generations. Same for eyes, ears, hearts, lungs, digestive systems, reproductive systems and everything else. Ask them to cite any of it. They can't, proving it's contrary to all of biology/science.
We're not calling our belief in God science, so we don't need to cite any of it. Evolutionists live by faith, Christians live by faith, but evolutionists are the ones passing off their anti-biology faith as science. Be not deceived. When we face God / Jesus Christ for a lifetime of lying, stealing, lusting, hating and more, having rejected His offer to pay for it Himself on the cross, it won't work for us to say "well how was I supposed to know?" I implore people re-read the gospels, then the rest, and forget what any religion / church has told us they say
So in other words you can't cite it. I rest my case.
I'm a Christian and agree with you. Comfort and YEC blatantly misrepresent the evidence. Hell they don't even understand or it probably wilful in his case the different standards of evidence.
To the answer to the question what you are asking is where is the creator in the creation? Lets say there’s a man who made a computer and then someone comes among and looks in the computer and says where the man “where’s the man who made the computer in here?” You see he’s not He’s outside and it’s the same with God is outside of space time and matter, your not going to find God in this one spot, because He’s outside of that. think about what happened at the beginning of the “big bang” Nothing exploded? If nothing exploded then there isn’t anything to evolve from.
Evolution is not Science
Comfort said that Darwin said 'i have never been an atheist'.
QUOTE MINE ALERT!!!
Darwin actually said "In my most extreme fluctuations I have never been an atheist in the sense of denying the existence of a God.- I think that generally (& more and more so as I grow older) but not always, that an agnostic would be the most correct description of my state of mind."
Darwin was being intellectually honest, he couldn't deny there is a God as he can't prove it, but he is agnostic as there is no reason to believe in God.
OK so he was an agnostic.
How does that contradict Comfort's claim that Darwin was not an atheist? Simple logic.
So...In Darwin's own words, he's not an atheist. What is your point hahaha!?
The only change I can see is from a professor to a fool.
Psalms 14. Praise God.
@Louis Juarez He/she didn't even quote something from the Bible. It's his/her own words. He/she just added a chapter about it.
You only see what you want to see.
Stop
@@linkthepig4219
That post is just a tad sparse. Try saying what should 'Stop' at the very least. It would also be efficacious to explain why.
@@ethelredhardrede1838
Stop the evolution denial ig, basic biology explains genetics, mutations and macroevolution.
I think you planted a seed in Peter’s heart. Thank you for doing this and being an example to all of us
@Jnr Burns did you even watch the video man?
@Jnr Burns Do you realize that all of those students from the different studies of science had the same response to a lot of Ray's questions? It seems that you know the answer to all of those questions so do you mind answering the questions that those students couldn't answer?
Ray's repeated question is asking for proof and none of the people being interviewed can give it. Isn't it less biased when asking different points of view on science the question?
It seems like you're feeling accomplished by making fun of the Christians on here commenting since I've seen quite a few of your responses that seem rude and judging.
When trying to prove a point let me tell you that you are less heard when speaking in the manner you are. You might lash out on me for this, but I'm praying for you, whether you want me to or not, whether you believe that God is real or not, whether you hate me or not. I really do hope that you allow Jesus into your heart, and I advise to watch more of Ray's videos to get a better insight if you need an answer to your questions
@Jnr Burns It's funny how you say to keep Christianity out of schools like it's not already happening because people just can't accept it, but will accept other beliefs. Christianity is being silenced by the second whereas everything against it is being promoted. And telling me that I'm pushing my belief onto people is kinda hypocritical, isn't it?
I'm pretty sure you know what he meant by kind. A dog is a kind of animal. A cat is a kind of animal. Dog cannot turn into cat. Dog cannot change it's kind. See what I'm getting at? That's what he means by kind. And it seems that you couldn't answer his question, because apparently it makes "no sense" when it's clear as day. And which is not proven that an animal can change it's kind. So I don't understand how you're saying that Christ isn't proven while evolution also isn't.
Religion has solved many problems. I'm still young living with my parents and there was a huge issue with my family that I won't get into, but long story short it was horrible and hurtful, leaving me depressed and crying every time I saw them in the same room. Praying to God solved my problem, seeing that my family was getting better. That's not the only situation where God has shown His light to me and fixed my problems. And this is just me, millions of other people had a great experience, and for how many times it's happened, I wouldn't call it a coincidence. I also find it odd how you're asking how religion solves any problems when you're not religious yourself.
Just remember that unlike this election, you can't vote when you're dead. When you're being judged, you can't change your mind about Christ anymore. Choose life before death, and life is Jesus Christ.
@Jnr Burns Sayonara
@@Vic-hc4rr Thanks Morgana for taking the time to write this down. Jnr has shown he was unable to answer any question and used an insult to prove his point.
Thank you Ray Comfort and the Living Waters team for this awesome video. God bless you. In Jesus name, Amen.
There is one GOD, the creator of all things. The GOD of Abraham Isaac and Jacob our Heavenly Father and saviour. Seek the LORD Jesus while you still have time. GOD bless you to the way to the truth and eternal life in the holy word of GOD the holy bible.
I see all these people saying they have the answer to the biggest question of mankind, but nobody is offering any evidence. How do you know if there's a God and what evidence is there that your God is the correct God and finally why would God punish me for not accepting him? Is there a valid evidence-based reason you believe in this specific God beyond what is written in a book?
Paul Millbank the LORD Jesus has done many miracles in my life. It dissent matter what I tell you paul, ofcourse there is tones of evidence but as I have spoken to many people like you in the past. Seek and you shall find, the same way I can gather the evidence you can too but you're too lazy. GOD doesn't send you to hell, people choose this place
@@sheriffbang8039 I'm not attacking your belief. I'm also not saying its guaranteed that you can convince me. I am saying if you have evidence I'll listen. Is my lack of belief equivalent to choosing to go to Hell? If it turned out that Zeus was the the correct God and you ended up in Hades would you say you chose that Hell? Don't reply that Zeus isn't the real God this is a hypothetical analogy to get you to understand my position. It's an example of why I reject the idea that I'm sending myself to Hell.
Paul Millbank never said you were bro, doesn't bother me if you do either. I don't need to defend the LORD Jesus he is GOD. GOD said you shall know by their fruits, a tree that doesn't give good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire, im sure you can understand the meaning of that verse, the LORD Jesus says seek and you shall find, for the kingdom of heaven is like a treasure hidden in the field, once you find it you will give up everything to have it. You as a person can tell the difference between evil and good, compare and test all religions, knowledge is power. I have studied Islam myself and know without doubt it is not from GOD. I can tell you that followers of the most high do not follow a thing called religion, it is a faith in the one true living GOD Jesus as he promises us eternal life. None other but him. His words are like no other, his ways are not our ways, for some people live for earthly things, pleasures of the flesh. Promise men many women and you will attract a certain type of Crowd which is the sick and perverse, promise them power on earth and like wise certain people shall come, promise them that they will be gods in the after life and the same, promise them that they will reincarnated into rats and stuff alike and the same certain people will come that proves As we all have different cultures and ideals, though some worship statues, some worship cows, some Mother Nature, some the sun the moon etc you get my point. So now when you study and learn let's say you read the holy bible and in it you find you shall not set up stones in your land and bow down onto them for I AM the LORD your GOD. At the point you need to ask yourself is this is really GOD or man talking, what would man benefit from saying such a thing? Worshiping idols and stuff alike such as the black stone is a mere stone, it is a stone made by man therefore it should benefit man to say such things so that they might sell items for example and have a god like figure that they can see touch. When the one true living GOD of Abraham Isaac and Jacob said not to do such things it proves it is not from man and also proves that GOD of the hoy bible is against all others so called religions. So once you have determined that no other religions have anything to do with the holy word of GOD in the holy bible you have isolated one out of 100. Let's take the teachings and the commandments of the Holy bible and compare them with others to know further if the holy bible is from GOD, the holy bible does not give man power on earth infact it is the opposite and says we will be hated and persecuted suffer a horrible death for his holy names sake the LORD Jesus, we will be mocked killed tortured. Why would anyone want to be a Christian? When you can run off to another religion that promises you power, woman, money etc, the LORD Jesus went further and said love those who persecute you, if Someone comes to Rob you give them your cloak also, pray for those who curse you, forgive and you shall be forgiven that you may be children of your father in Heaven. There is no greater teaching in the world that even comes close to what I just told you, in reality no one wants to do this, people would rather do the opposite, be honest with yourself. How hard is it to love the ones who persecute you or to pray for them. The LORD Jesus fulfilled the law, he did everything he said, when they attacked him, mocked him and tortured him he forgave them, he still loved them and never fought back, like a lamb to the slaughter. That is GOD my friend, there is one GOD and only one way to GOD, it's on the individual to find that path for there is no other way but Jesus. For he alone is the way to the truth and eternal life. Would you follow a man called Mohammad who fondles women on their period claiming he is a prophet and everything he said and did is from Allah, a man called Mohammad who seen in a wet dream an angel of Allah came to him with a photo of Aisha that was 6 years old and he was in his 50s. I can go on forever but I know you get my point. You can believe a cow is god, or a Hindu statue of death called shiva, or a fat kid called Buddha rub his belly and hope for the best. As for me I shall serve the LORD who had done many miracles in my life and I can only invite you to meet him. Sorry if I didnt answer all your questions bro I am at work typing away when I am not meant to haha. Wide is the gate that leads to destruction, narrow is the gate that leads onto eternal life and very few shall find it. Know what is good and believe the good news that GOD loves you bro and you can be saved. He is reaching out to you, you lose nothing and gain eternity to be with the LORD, GOD doesn't ask for money or the keys to your jet ski. Come as you are a sinner and humble yourself before the most high, he the LORD Jesus will lift you up, and plant you on a rock that once you are in his hand no one Can take you out. When a man commits a crime we don't give him a holiday house in Hawaiii and like wise if you commit sin GOD being the Judge of all judges will punish those individuals according to their deeds. GODs ways are not our ways. You're wrong about GOD sending people to hell that have no knowledge of GOD, the LORD Jesus said to the scribes for you say you see your sin remains. Considering I have told you who the LORD Jesus is and you now have the knowledge then your blood is no longer on my hands, it's on yours. The word of GOD shall be preached threwout all the four corners of the earth and take hed no one deceive you for there are many false prophets that come to you in sheeps clothing but inwardly they are ravaging wolves, beware of false Christs my friend for many will tell you look Jesus is over there. Do not go or believe them. Stand true to the LORD Jesus in Faith and the LORD will have his reward with him. If you pray in humility to GOD the father in Jesus name from your heart, I know in mine you will get an answer. Dare to prove me wrong ? I can tell you have a good heart bro. The LORD works in mysterious ways. Do some research on Noah's ark in turkey, and please watch the documentary on sodom. And watch This bro it's a short video th-cam.com/video/3bHAn5i4NiE/w-d-xo.html
Blessed is he who believes without seeing
@@sheriffbang8039 You wrote more than I can respond to so I'll take two things. How do you define faith and what did Jesus say that is like no other?
14:39 that guy straight out admitted that you can only make a rose with supernatural abilities
Yes, a person could only make a Rose with supernatural abilities, because there’s no way we could ever have one evolve with our hands, and that’s incredibly silly since that process would take a lot of time and the right selective pressures. Your ‘gotcha’ moment doesn’t work and is incredibly stupid.
@@laserfan17 what do you think about the entirety of this video?
@@Lord-Lord-Lord-Lord-Lord That it’s pure crap, full of misinformation, ignorance, lies and anti-science religious propaganda.
Ever heared of selective breeding?
Of course a human can't make a rose. That doesn't mean it requires "supernatural abilities." A rose makes a new rose. A human makes a new human. That's how biology works. Not sure how this is a difficult concept.
Don't forget that this film is an edited version of a much larger amount of footage, tailored to make Ray's point, regardless of it's validity. That's no crime, but you might want to keep it in mind as you watch this.
Will if you want you can watch them on there channel.
Hgyh
Evolution is proven well beyond a reasonable doubt.
No, common descent from a first life form evolution is completely anti-science. Science is about the repeatable portion of reality, not things like common descent evolution that contradict repeatable reality, can only be believed in, and they call reasons to believe in it 'evidence'.
The bottom line is the topic of the origin of all biological diversity is beyond the scope of science as beliefs, and reasons to believe in it, are all anyone can bring to the table.
Here's what *is* science: A.k.a., well documented and published even in evolutionists' own papers (when they happen to include something that's actually observable, repeatable, verifiable biological, scientific fact when they're telling their common descent stories and why they believe in it) that demonstrates common descent from a first life form is anti-science. Science shows that it's observable, repeatable, verifiable scientific fact that, no matter how many generations go by,
no matter how much "change in genetic composition during successive generations",
no matter how much "change in allele frequencies",
no matter how much "development of new species",
no matter how much "natural selection acting on genetic variation among individuals",
no matter how much "adaptation",
no matter how much "mutation",
no matter how much "speciation",
no matter how much "migration",
no matter how much "genetic drift",
no matter how much "insert other claims here"
no matter how many generations go by, ALL populations of:
fish remain fish
amphibians remain amphibians,
canines remain canines,
felines remain felines,
reptiles remain reptiles,
birds remain birds,
viruses remain viruses,
animals that never had lungs to breath air do not evolve lungs
animals that never had hearts to pump blood do not evolve hearts
animals that never had eyes to see do not evolve eyes
animals that never had brains do not evolve brains
animals that never had mouths do not evolve mouths
living things that never had a reproductive system do not evolve a reproductive system
animals that never had (insert organ here) remain living things without that organ, and so on.
There are many more such groups.
Science shows that the "common descent from a first life form" evolution (some call Darwinian evolution, some call theory of common descent) is anti-science.
Evolutionist can never address these facts - many unfortunately just fall back on ad hominem, showing how they're seem to be really about deception that's contrary to actual science.
I implore people to re-read the gospels and forget what any religion, church, denomination claims they say. We'll all face God for a lifetime of lying, stealing, lusting, hating, coveting, blaspheming and more. There are only two religions in the world to address this: Countless versions of "DO this or that and you (might) be saved" and God / Jesus Christ's truth of "It is DONE by Jesus the Christ on the cross and we believe on Him along to be saved - received by faith - and what goes along with it that God does (that shows us our 'faith' is genuine) is we have a change of mind and a change of desires about sin and a new desire to instead follow God.
@@ForumLight Wow, you've spend a lot of time writing that, and you're wrong. Evolutions IS proven well beyond any reasonable doubt. I'm sorry, but you're ignorant of the evidence, or you're not willing to see it.
Fossils, genetics, embryonics, lab tests of different kinds and many other independent lines of evidence exist.
@@danielduvana Fossils don't show 'these evolved into populations of those" over generations. It just shows something lived.
Evolutionists think if you look at fossils and make up a belief about them that never happens, it nevertheless makes the fossil an "observation" or "evidence" of the belief they made up about them. Anti-science circular reasoning. Same for dna similarity and beliefs they make up ABOUT it.
Evolutionist "That's a transitional fossil - and here are reasons I believe it is"
"How do you know it is?"
Evolutionist "Because common descent from a first life form evolution is true"
"How do you know it's true when it never happens?"
Evolutionist "Because that's a transitional fossil - and here are reasons I believe it is"
(repeat)
Evolutionist "DNA similarity and our beliefs about ERV's shows this and that are cousins - and here are reasons I believe it shows that!"
"How do you know it does?"
Evolutionist "Because common descent from a first life form evolution is true"
"How do you know it is true when it never happens?"
Evolutionist "Because DNA similarity and our beliefs about ERV's shows this and that are cousins - and here are reasons I believe it shows that!"
(repeat)
It would be similar to the analogy of someone else making up a brand new (unrelated to evolution) belief like "populations of trees morphed over generations eventually into human beings" and claiming fossilized tree branches and DNA similarity between tree branches and humans are "evidence" or "observations" of it, and it would be just as much of an anti-science farce.
If there were initially multiple life forms that led to all life we see today, then large groups of life would in no way be related yet they'd still have some degree of dna similarity, some degree of visible similarity in their fossils, which also shows making assumption about dna similarity or fossils as if it means life is related with a common ancestor is circular reasoning and anti-science.
The bottom line is the topic of the origin of all biological diversity is beyond the scope of science as beliefs, and reasons to believe in it, are all anyone can bring to the table.
@@ForumLight You clearly don't have a clue what you're talking about. The fossil records absolutley proves evolution in and of itself, and then there's a bazillion other pieces of evidence.
You need to ask yourself why you're resistant to accept evolution? What are your biases? Are you persuing the truth no matter the cost or are you trying to protect your already held beliefs?
Evolution is true beyond any reasonable doubt, the evidence is overwhelming. The only way to not accept it is to be ignorant or to be resistant to the truth.
Btw, accepting evolution is not a problem for religion. Lots of christians understand that evolution is true and is fine with that.
Please take a course in evolution or something.
@@danielduvana _"The fossil records absolutley proves evolution in and of itself"_ False. Looking at two fossils does not "prove" "populations of these 'evolved' over generations eventually into populations of those" except in the minds of evolutionists and why they insist we throw out all of science and biology to believe them instead.
Thank u Lord. I hope people really open their eyes now
Shut up
For some there is a scripture, "thinking themselves wise in their own eyes they become fools." One can''t change or help a fool unless the person wakes up to reality and their ego gets deflated enough to recognize reality and truth. In the meanwhile pray for them. We can bind the Satanic demonic spirits from controlling them and loose/intercede for God to intervene. We have no control over any human, such is evil, however we have Jesus authority and should use it to set people free.
Reasoning is not necessary, just thinking you are right and others that disagree are your enemies and hate mongers and right wing extremists, etc. Saul Alinski trained many well to defy God and authority and create chaos. The bad thing is they think they are in control while they are being controlled by demons, hate, selfishness, lust for power and control over others --- all while not recognizing they are the problem because of their convoluted/warped/egocentric/non-sensical thinking.
Slurp you don't see your brain, so I guess u dont hv one
This opened my eyes as to why most religious people are complete idiots with no grasp on logic or science.
Thanks video.
SO... it all basically comes down to faith as well!
No there is observable evidence. Asking people things on the spot doesn’t prove or disprove any point made in the video
@Mateo 19:14 the only observable evidence you have is a really old book.
Liam Jones observable, more like completely anecdotal and unprovable
God doesn't rely on faith at all. Once you know...you know!
Quantum Leap can you show “God”
"I believe what the textbooks tell me [with no evidence]"
thats blind leading the blind who have blind faith in a blind because blind wrote the textbook if blind leads a blind they will both fall in a pit
"I believe what the Bible tells me [with no evidence]!"
@@dinohall2595 JESUS lived, he was a man.
@@dogelife7901 Can you provide actual evidence of this and (more importantly) evidence that Jesus was the son of God and performed his purported miracles?
Dino Hall you can’t even argue that Jesus wasn’t real even evolutionists know he’s real. And everyone knows he did thos things but the argument is whether or not he was driving out the demons of the people because we was the leader of the demons, or because he had the Holy Spirit in him
Any one of these phds could put him in his place by asking him what is a kind? There is no classification biological classification which is called kind.
What you call it doesn't matter.
Common descent evolutionists claim in the past the first amphibians evolved over generations from some populations of fish. That's contrary to science.
Common descent evolutionists claim in the past the first reptiles evolved over generations from some populations of amphibians. That's contrary to science.
Common descent evolutionists claim in the past the first mammals evolved over generations from some populations of reptiles. That's contrary to science.
Common descent evolutionists claim in the past the first living things with lungs (or eyes, or ears, or hearts, or brains, or reproductive system and so much more) evolved over generations from some populations of living things that never had such thing. That's contrary to science.
Science is about the repeatable portion of reality, not things like common descent evolution that contradict repeatable reality, can only be believed in, and they call reasons to believe in it 'evidence'.
The bottom line is the topic of the origin of all biological diversity is beyond the scope of science as beliefs, and reasons to believe in it, are all anyone can bring to the table.
Here's what *is* science: A.k.a., well documented and published even in evolutionists' own papers (when they happen to include something that's actually observable, repeatable, verifiable biological, scientific fact when they're telling their common descent stories and why they believe in it) that demonstrates common descent from a first life form is anti-science. Science shows that it's observable, repeatable, verifiable scientific fact that, no matter how many generations go by,
no matter how much "change in genetic composition during successive generations",
no matter how much "change in allele frequencies",
no matter how much "development of new species",
no matter how much "natural selection acting on genetic variation among individuals",
no matter how much "adaptation",
no matter how much "mutation",
no matter how much "speciation",
no matter how much "migration",
no matter how much "genetic drift",
no matter how much "insert other claims here"
no matter how many generations go by, ALL populations of:
fish remain fish
amphibians remain amphibians,
canines remain canines,
felines remain felines,
reptiles remain reptiles,
birds remain birds,
viruses remain viruses,
animals that never had lungs to breath air do not evolve lungs
animals that never had hearts to pump blood do not evolve hearts
animals that never had eyes to see do not evolve eyes
animals that never had brains do not evolve brains
animals that never had mouths do not evolve mouths
living things that never had a reproductive system do not evolve a reproductive system
animals that never had (insert organ here) remain living things without that organ, and so on.
There are many more such groups.
Science shows that the "common descent from a first life form" evolution (some call Darwinian evolution, some call theory of common descent) is anti-science.
Evolutionist can never address these facts - many unfortunately just fall back on ad hominem, showing how they're seem to be really about deception that's contrary to actual science.
===== Part TWO =====
Here are a few objections/claims they may bring up when they cannot address the above observable, repeatable and verifiable facts:
*Evolutionists sometimes try to claim you're against science.*
Science is fine and requires no belief.
In the entire existence of the human race: Objects drop to the ground. Observable, repeatable, verifiable, no belief required.
In the entire existence of the human race: Diseases spread. Observable, repeatable, verifiable, no belief required.
In the entire existence of the human race: All populations of: canines remain canines, fish remain fish, reptiles remain reptiles, animals that never had hearts do not evolve hearts, animals that never had digestive systems do not evolve digestive systems (or brains, or eyes, or reproductive systems and many, many more cases like these). Observable, repeatable, verifiable, no belief required.
*Evolutionists sometimes try to say they don't claim that populations of 'animals turn into other animals' over generations*
Quite the opposite. Evolutionists claim the first life form was a single cell. They claim that it is the ancestor of all living things today. That's "animals turning into other animal" over generations of mythological proportions. They claim humans, apes, rats, banana plants (50% DNA similarity to human beings) are all related - that's again "species turning into other species" of mythological proportions, claiming all life is related.
At some point reptiles did not exist in their worldview. That means they claim over generations some populations animals that were never reptiles 'evolved' over generations eventually into reptiles - That's "animals turning into other animals" over generations to mythological degrees.
At some point no animals had brains. This means they claim over generations some populations of animals that never had brains 'evolved' brains over generations.
Yet when called out on this some evolutionists even try to say "evolution doesn't say species turn into other species", which again is just not honest. It shows they not only know they're wrong, but they show their intent to push this falsehood anyway.
*If you point out evolutionists "populations over generations" claims, and some will dishonestly pretend you're claiming evolutionists are saying that one kind of animal 'gives birth' to another kind".* Which again is clearly deception. Science shows *populations over generations* do not do what they claim.
*Evolutionists typically imply making up reasons to believe in their common descent from a first life form belief system is the same as "observing" it,* which of course is false and is just circular reasoning. Making up beliefs ABOUT fossils or ABOUT DNA *that never happens* does not then make fossils or DNA 'evidence' or an 'observation of' of the belief you just made up about them.
*Evolutionists also typically resort to the crime analogy.* For example, since you cannot "observe" a certain crime, but can look at "evidence" for a crime, that shows we can know things happened without observing it. But what they ignore: the thing called a "crime" is already observable, repeatable, verifiable reality, so now we can look for forensic 'evidence' of some *MORE* possible crimes that no one is left alive to have observed it. By sharp contrast, what evolutionists do would be the same as giving 'evidence' for some strange new crime that's never been observed even once by the human race, and yet claim that's also an observation of this crime that never happens actually happening (for example: a "crime" of turning someone into a tree).
*Even some people factually observing something that's never happened is not science if it's not repeatable and also verifiable*. So for example, hundreds of people are witness to the fact Jesus Christ rose from the dead (or that He raised others from death), and they wrote about it. Direct observation. But it's still not science because it's *not repeatable* and not *verifiable.* There's also evidence He rose from the dead, and some have observed Him alive after the fact, but it's STILL not science that people can be raised from the dead, in spite of evidence, and in spite of it also being directly observed - because it's not *repeatable* and not *verifiable.* And so it goes with the belief of common descent from a first life form - not only is it not *repeatable,* not *verifiable,* it's not even *observable* either - which makes the resurrection far more likely to be called science before the belief of common descent from a first life form ever could. But neither of them can be called science of course.
===== Part Three =====
*Evolutionists almost always are against Christ but are teaching their religion* that goes along with their belief of common descent from a first life form - the belief of 'nothing did it - it all just happened on it's own, including life - you're just another animal related to all animals - so live how you want and you'll rest in peace when you die". But they also pass this religion off 'you are god' off as science as well.
That in mind, I implore people to re-read the gospels and forget what any church or any religion or anyone has claimed they say and sincerely consider yet again for ourselves. Judgment is coming for us all for our lifetime of sinning AND refusing God's offer to forgive and forget in the person of Jesus Christ. But religions also twist God's truth to make people think it's their religion and system of rules that makes them right with God when it's about a person: Jesus Christ, and choosing to have a relationship with Him, having a change of mind about living for ourselves and turning back towards God/ Jesus Christ to live for Him instead.
John 3 : 14-21 *_"[Jesus said] And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up [i.e., on the cross]: That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life. For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved [exposed]. But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God."_*
Live forever, friend!
@@ForumLight How did I know I would see your same old rubbish when I expanded the comments section for this post.
This is sooooooo awesome. I wish I could talk to people like you.
Lena Lena
You can! 👍🏼 I do it all the time!
Me too
Phill Baldvalley
Which part was a lie?
Living Waters: 1-800-437-1893
Adrian, sad you feel that way. God be with you!
It's painful to watch.. what's wrong with his way of questioning
it's like he already has an answer which is set in stone no matter
what other people tell em, he's just trying to piss people off and feed them his belief
That’s the point you can’t disprove him..in other words Yahweh is king God bless😂🙏🏽
It’s on purpose Bc when you start looking into evolution it becomes apparent we should have found transitional fossils yet we haven’t which is strange don’t you think. I’m not arguing either way just stating a fact.
@@allenporter1496 we have. we have many miacis fossils. the ancestor of both cats and dogs
:) I hope they came to Christ.
Me too but tbh I’m not sure about god I’ve tried
@@brandonmmmmmmmm3293 and how it is going? I mean have you given up on building that relationship with God?
Here is my argument. Come to think of it. You will have answers to whatever inconsistencies or contradictions or questions thrown at you by people not in your faith. Now these answers are enough for you but might be illogical to me. And the reverse is true for any one in any other faith. You prescribe to the beliefs of your forefathers. Your ancestors have spread these beliefs just like they were spread to them (assuming you're European or American). This is your culture, something you hold paramount, something you hold to be the absolute truth. The same exact feelings you have towards your faith are true for the Muslim, the Jew, the Hindu, the many African mythologists. Doesn't it bother you that what you hold as the truth is just a mere consequence of the course of history. Had history taken a different course and the Africans were the ones who colonized Europe, chances are you would be subscribing to their beliefs today. Your faith is not any different from any other in the world.
Hello. People have come to faith in Jesus Christ from all backgrounds, all upbringings, all ages, all races, all cultures. So us pretending it's only because we were taught it by our parents is moot.
Secondly, there are 2000 prophesies in the Bible that have come true locally/globally, even up to thousands of years after being written. Other 'religious' texts: none.
In the Bible there are dozens of facts about reality that even scientists could not figure out until up to thousands of years after being written. Other 'religious' texts: none.
The Bible was written over 1500 years through 40 penmen, multiple languages, over three continents, reads as one mind. Every other 'religious' text: one person, one lifetime.
The grave of Christ is empty. The grave of every other 'religion's prophet has their bones.
This won't matter to those determined to reject Christ - but it will leave us all without excuse before God thinking we'll be able to say "well how was I supposed to know?!"
I implore people to re-read the Gospels yet again and forget what any religion / church / commentator claims they say - it will be our own fault if we're deceived by them. God / Jesus Christ did not come here to create a world-wide religious organization - but instead to adopt / save individuals, by faith, that they then live a lifetime of works towards God, joining local congregations (church).
" I just go on whatever I see and hear!" That's called The herd mentality.
@Jnr Burns Religion?? What's religion got to do with it? Jesus says To come unto Me all you who are weary and heavy laden and I will give you rest! It's an individual choice to come to Jesus... religion is a man made word. It's your choice to believe or not.
Jnr Burns but didn’t an atheist say those words?
Thats called history....... If u dnt believe history then ua dumbass......
Evolution is herd mentality.
@Jnr Burns Jesus and god is real evolution is fake
"Human Beings are fish?"
"Yes of course"
lol
Mermaids. LOL!
If humans evolved from fish , we would have kept the gills , like The Man From Atlantis !
@Andrew Davis
God made Adam and Eve. Humans are from them.
For it was You who created my inward parts; You knit me together in my mother’s womb.
Psalms 139:13 HCSB
@Andrew Davis
Just under 6,000 yrs ago.
Satan is the king of lies
Aborigines are human
descendants of Adam and Eve
Andrew Davis aboriginals could have been exiled from ancient civilizations
This video is absurd. Right up there with Ray Comfort's ignorant clip on the banana. Professor P.Z. Myers (University of Minnesota, Morris) is consistently on target in his responses. The interviewer repeatedly asks for evidence for a 'change of kinds'. By this he means a transition sufficiently large to require millions of years in the fossil record. Yet the fossil record is dismissed because it falls outside the interviewer's narrow perception of scientific evidence. Many of the interviewees are understandably confused. That no example exists within the specified bounds has no bearing on the historical fact of evolution or the well established mechanisms by which it occurs. Ditto, the questioning on the impossibility of fabricating a rose from nothing. No plausible alternative explanation for the fossil record is presented. The segment on famous atheists is unsurprising. The editors omit any response in which a famous atheist was named. It is also irrelevant because it has no bearing on the evidence for evolution. That said, two-thirds of American academic scientists are atheist or agnostic, and nearly all of the best scientists - for good reason. Religion doesn't make any sense. At stake is not the existence or non-existence of a generic or generalized god but the dozens of gods in which people actually believe, the ones that care about our sins and sex lives and respond to prayer. Those gods are imaginary, incompatible with our scientific understanding of how the natural world works. The inevitable segment on morality is likewise irrelevant. Only those with no knowledge of history or other cultures could conclude that an absolute yardstick exists. Morality is whatever we and the society in which we live decides that it ought to be. Scripture is in any case a dreadful point of departure for moral guidance. While many of those questioned display an appalling lack of understanding of evolution and the evidence for evolution, like all science evolution depends entirely on evidence. It has nothing to do with belief or 'blind faith'. It is misleading even to ask whether someone 'believes' in evolution. Those who wish to become better informed should read: Jerry A. Coyne, 2009, Why Evolution is True: Penguin, 282 p. Comfort himself is invited to join me in the field in March, 2014 to examine the geological record (the actual evidence) up close. It is one thing to be ignorant, and quite another dishonestly to mislead the general public in the way that Living Waters does. - Nicholas Christie-Blick, Professor, Columbia University
You just showed proof of the same blind faith that Richard Dawkins thinks you are a complete idiot for having. Why are you so angry at a movie that just made evolutionists and atheists question their "faith" in their beliefs? All the same evolutionary professors do to young, impressionable, students (many times Christian) when these professors and teachers have an intellectual advantage over the students they issue grades to. At least this guy approached them without having them under has thumb with test scores, grades, and class failure! Why can't you be intellectually honest?
Low-hanging fruit, Dana. My classes are entirely about how to think critically about evidence. All of the observational evidence in this case points in one direction: the diversity of life relates to evolution by natural selection, not divine creation. Ray Comfort has no interest in the evidence. Indeed he dismisses the fossil evidence as somehow irrelevant when it is obviously critical to the interpretation of a lineage. As a creationist, he isn't even honest. In a defense of a critique of this clip he implies that he has no problem with the long timescale implied by geology - the timescale over which divine intervention is neither required nor plausible. Yet, at the end of this piece, he pushes the Creation Museum in Kentucky. The Answers in Genesis folk at that museum are adamant that only Young Earth Creationism is admissible. Those positions are wholly incompatible.
ForumLight
The evolutionary pathway from fish to humans: lobe-finned fish to tetrapods, to amphibians, to reptiles, to mammals, to primates, to humans. It took about 400 million years. Prof. Myers's quip was evidently in full knowledge of such facts, which are established beyond any reasonable doubt in the scientific community. (The anatomical evidence is overwhelming.)
Nicholas Christie-Blick Yes, I know but (sigh..) Forum Light will not want to engage in a *real* science discussion regarding evolution. This observation is, alas, from experience. All the air went out of his balloon when someone showed him that the Universe couldn't possibly be only 6,000 years old. He disappeared, defeated, but apparently is back now for more trolling.
ForumLight
Please re-read what I wrote. Given that you're not a scientist (obviously), I recommend Neil Shubin's 2009 book, 'Your Inner Fish': Vintage Books, 237 p.
Extremely sad to see people who willfully blind themselves just to run away from God.
6:26 Ray: Human beings are fish?
Professor: Well, yes ofcourse they are...😂😂😂
🤣
Professor of Lunatics?
😭
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !!
Melissa Armenta 😂😂
"Evolution is unproven and unprovable. We Believe it only because the only alternative is special creation?"
Evolutionist Sir Arthur Keith
Evolution is fact. Go learn. It feels really, really good.
@@timothyrose5366 Only for those who believe in it dude!
Vladimir Mladenov one doesn’t believe in science. It is just the clearest pathway to the truth. But what is especially uninteresting is non scientists making ignorant assertions about a discipline they know nothing about.
Oh, trust me they do! More than you apparently know 😉 Evolution has never been proved! It has always been yet another hypothesis that even some of it’s greatest proponents doubted and admitted that it’s more of a substitute belief for theism than a “proved” theory. And trust me, I’ve experienced this propaganda first hand during the atheistic communist regime! Evolution=Religion - Check this out:
"Evolution is unproven and unprovable. We believe it only because the only alternative is special creation?"
Evolutionist Sir Arthur Keith
Vladimir Mladenov just by quoting someone doesn’t make any assertion you have close to truth. Evolution is a sound theory. Science doesn’t prove things. Do you even know how science works? The Soviet world had some pretty outstanding scientific minds.
I love the analogy of the money belt and you're drowning. Of course you'd let go of your riches. We need to let go of the things that are pulling us under.
Yeah it's really good 😊
U shouldn't love the world cause it will take you to hell
"Enlightenment" is actually speaking just as much about weight as it is light.
The body is dense, the spirit is light, and rises easily. Enlightenment can only be achieved by dropping the spiritual density.
@@quantumleap4023 No offense but where did u hear that crazy idea
@@emmanuelthwala2809 That is a piece of some ancient spiritual knowledge. It has been known for centuries: the spirit is not physical, but more like vapor or smoke, the soul is likened to water, the eyes are the window to the soul, the eyes contain salt water, the eyes can see, aka SEA.
The body is likened to the earth elements, made up of the dust of the earth. Language is spelling, spell casting.
to lighten your density is to transfer from the flesh or the physical, to the metaphysical and spiritual realms of being.
Too much to get into right now...
@@quantumleap4023 Eh ok
I get that the spirit , soul and flesh be different but this new age stuff just gonna take by the arm and pull you to hell my dude💔 so plz just get JESUS 🙏👊
I am not an evolution defender, and I belive in God, but after watching this video, I wondered that some evolutionists would do the question "but how do you explain that all living beings share the same DNA, wich is evidence that evolution is true?" and I wouldn't know what to answer.
pretty good talk thoguh, great way to spread Jesus's gosplel! keep working on that!
Why would all life that's not related have to have 0% dna similarity/ If two living things have eyes, why would there not be some amount of dna similarity because of that? Science is about the repeatable portion of reality, not things like common descent evolution that contradict repeatable reality, can only be believed in, and they call reasons to believe in it 'evidence'.
The bottom line is the topic of the origin of all biological diversity is beyond the scope of science as beliefs, and reasons to believe in it, are all anyone can bring to the table.
Here's what *is* science: A.k.a., well documented and published even in evolutionists' own papers (when they happen to include something that's actually observable, repeatable, verifiable biological, scientific fact when they're telling their common descent stories and why they believe in it) that demonstrates common descent from a first life form is anti-science. Science shows that it's observable, repeatable, verifiable scientific fact that, no matter how many generations go by,
no matter how much "change in genetic composition during successive generations",
no matter how much "change in allele frequencies",
no matter how much "development of new species",
no matter how much "natural selection acting on genetic variation among individuals",
no matter how much "adaptation",
no matter how much "mutation",
no matter how much "speciation",
no matter how much "migration",
no matter how much "genetic drift",
no matter how much "insert other claims here"
no matter how many generations go by, ALL populations of:
fish remain fish
amphibians remain amphibians,
canines remain canines,
felines remain felines,
reptiles remain reptiles,
birds remain birds,
viruses remain viruses,
animals that never had lungs to breath air do not evolve lungs
animals that never had hearts to pump blood do not evolve hearts
animals that never had eyes to see do not evolve eyes
animals that never had brains do not evolve brains
animals that never had mouths do not evolve mouths
living things that never had a reproductive system do not evolve a reproductive system
animals that never had (insert organ here) remain living things without that organ, and so on.
There are many more such groups.
Science shows that the "common descent from a first life form" evolution (some call Darwinian evolution, some call theory of common descent) is anti-science.
Evolutionist can never address these facts - many unfortunately just fall back on ad hominem, showing how they're seem to be really about deception that's contrary to actual science.
@@ForumLight 🤨
@@ForumLight "Why would all life that's not related have to have 0% dna similarity/ If two living things have eyes, why would there not be some amount of dna similarity because of that? " thats not how genetics work. Genes dont always have physical alterations of an organism, you can trace these physically altering genes alongside other genes which activate them to create a family tree.
They all have the same Creator
@@LouAnnBagnall I know, but for evolutionists saying "they just have the same creator" is not enough... they want evidence about genetics, that all life is related
It's actually an unintellect thought to think and believe that humans evolved from 'nothing'. The movie is worth watching and worth to share to youngsters who are under the captivity of the devil's 'scientific' lies!
th-cam.com/video/pZyRgYZe6tM/w-d-xo.html
Athiests don't belive we evolved from nothing. We know the Big Bang is the act of the universe expanding, but we don't know the cause, or if that event even needs a cause. And we aren't afraid to say we don't know instead of making up myths to comfort us in the absense of knowledge.
It never says that they came from nothing
@@elchanguas9499them where does that thing( whatever it is called) that expands (which is why it's called the big bang) come from if it didn't came nothing? Same question for the first life that evolved to humans.
@@jehielmutia1744 the "Big bang" definetly has a cause, one that hasn't been discovered or Maybe one wich we have know since we existed (yes, im talking about God), the same goes for the first life forms.
I believe in God, im Christian
Yay! Years after I watched this with my dad on dvd, I found it on TH-cam! 😃
God bless you😁❤
And I've watched it with my 11 yr. old daughter. How old were u watched it w ur dad.
@@merrr9738 God bless you, too. 🤗
@@israelrodriguez6986 That's awesome. ☺ I was in my early 20's. 😁
@@israelrodriguez6986watch out the schools teach on evolution and it makes kids like me confused I'm 13yrs
*"Its not God vs Evolution. God created the universe to be evolutionary in everything"* But God created human beings at the beginning - He did not create a world of suffering and death, where populations of fish evolved over generations eventually into amphibians, then reptiles, then mammals, then apes, then human beings. Huge difference. God makes it clear in His Word He did no such thing.
Absolutely brilliant comment.
When God Created the Earth, He Created everything Full Sized. The trees, the mountains and animals, everything.
I believe He created the Earth to look much older than it truly was. A little God patina if you will.
Someone asked my Preacher, "What came first the chicken or the egg?"
He explained that God did indeed create the chicken first and full size.
Love your comment. :)
@@timgiles9413 Why did he need a worldwide flood to murder innocent babies and animals then? Couldn't he have just banished all the 'sinful' people and started over? No need for a flood.
CG but everyone was sinful. It was stated in the Bible. Even the babies would grow up to be sinful since they had sinful parents, and God knew that. We can’t ever forget that God is all-knowing and he had a plan. It’s not blind faith, it’s just faith that leans on the fact that God is good and cares for all humans, even though we are all sinful and in desperate need of help.
@@bennettoneill203 I'm sorry but murdering innocent babies is disgusting. Think about what you just said again.
@@bennettoneill203 A plan to allow an innocent child to be born to be murdered by him soon after ( which he would have known ) a plan to allow children to be born with permanent disabilities and illness from birth. What kind of sick monster do you worship?
The title should have been:
"The art of using fallacious arguments and pseudoscience to argue against actual science."
Hello. Common descent from a first cell evolution is the claim that populations of living things that never had brains 'evolved' brains over generations. Same for eyes, or ears, hearts, lungs, digestive systems, reproductive systems and so much more. Ask them to cite evolution doing any of this over generations. They can't, proving this belief of theirs is contrary to all of biology / science. Be not deceived, friend.
I implore people to re-read the gospels yet again and forget what any religion / church claims they say, and see for yourself. God / Jesus Christ did not come here to create a world-wide organized religion to control all churches. He saves individuals and they form/join local churches.
Oh my go, finally someone with an actual frontal lobe
“Should be able to whip me up a rose real quick”
I was crying the way he said it
Golden moment 😆
Why? It was silly at best.
@@ethelredhardrede1838 someone sounds angry lol
@@DisticTV
Someone must be projecting because there is not only no sign of anger from anyone, besides you, on this thread, I never get angry at anything online. Nor does stupidity anger me, it's normal.
It took billions of years of evolution by natural selection for roses to come about. Only a complete idiot would think that was clever. It's the sort nonsense that I expect from people that work this hard at being ignorant.
Now whipping up an imaginary god is what only takes a moment.
@@ethelredhardrede1838 I could tell tou were triggered from the video
What I wouldn't give to sit down and talk to Ray. All of these people are unprepared for his mental gymnastics.
WOW! I was shocked at those people who would think about saving a dog over a human being! Atheism really messes you up!
ForumLight
Still not answering my questions. You are just telling more lies.
That is not a coincidence. Bible believers normally have no explainable moral, they are rotten to the core, so what they try to do is to tell lies about others like "killing people" and so on.
When someone explains that humans are similar to other animals that would cause exact the opposite. We would become vegetarians, because that we are not mentally handicapped like mice for example is caused by random selection. That means: We would stop murdering our animal cousins etc. BECAUSE it would be MURDER.
Humans are mammals like dogs, horses, pigs etc. But dogs and the most other animals are mentally handicapped, because of the lack of brain development.That means we need to show enormous empathy to those (all life on this world) because it is like helping mentally handicapped humans - someone we should help. That is a reason why Dawkins and Co. know that to be vegan is from an ethical point of view the best way to life. They are just to lazy like bible believers like ForumLight are to lazy to throw his fear about hell fairy tales.
Angelmou
While I personally am not an expert on the subject matter, I feel the need to bring something up. I have several questions. If vegan is ethical, why is it ethical? Who says it is ethical, and on what grounds are they allowed to say that it is ethical? What are you basing your ethics on? I bring these questions up, because the major flaw in your argument is that if you do not have an Objective (or outside based) set of morals, then it is necessary for you to have a Subjective (or personal) set of morals. If your morals are subjective, they vary from person to person, stating that so long as a person is content with their actions, the actions are ethical. I don't mean to rant, but I cannot see how something is ethical or moral to the entire world unless there are objective morals.
If you can answer the questions logically and present a valid argument for those questions, your statement about "They are just to lazy like bible believers like ForumLight are to lazy to throw his fear about hell fairy tales." might be considered. Thank you.
Humans created the dogs we see today, otherwise they would still be wolves. they are like our furry little children...
ForumLight
"that I'm just an animal," You are so confused that you even think the word "animal" is some sort of insult or offense.
Animal is an absolute neutral term.
It is not an offense nor it is a compliment - It is a description of what we are nothing more.
The interviewer is so frustrating! He keeps interrupting them and misunderstanding what they’re saying. The professors keep on trying to tell them that in order to see observable changes in species (or “kinds” as the interviewer puts it) there needs to be a larger time frame.
And since obviously the modern human hasn’t been around for amount of time needed for species to species change, theres is no “observable” changes.
But the example the professors are giving, the finches and bacteria, are proof that change still does happen, but in smaller ways because of the smaller time frame
tldr: human life is short, thus cannot see the billion years of evolution. But can still see the small changes in the decades of observation.
so basically micro evolution.. which the interviewer will say is real. No proof at all for macroevolution.
Microevolution is a loss of information can you give me an example of additional information in the genome(macroevolution)?
@@VictoriaLeigh1990 Microevolution is literally macroevolution but on a smaller scale. For example we know for a fact that the solar system, the milky way galaxy exists, the solar system is just on a smaller scale compared to the milky way galaxy.
@@VictoriaLeigh1990 we can imply from the micro-evolution that macro evolution is real based on fossil records and trends
@Justin Gary Of course it does man , but we can infer from the trends and small changes in the small time frame to make an estimate of how much has already changed. It's like how you can graph a line just by using two points close to each other.