Sir I believe you may have passed beyond "amateur" rocketry, and I am an engineer. Your SRB based soft-landing has significant impacts in drone and rocket based cargo delivery.
I know you used quotes but amateur is mean to signify why you are doing work rather than how good you are at it. Same as professional but opposite. Expert vs inexpert, or Expert vs unqualified are suppose to be about experience. They have definitely passed beyond inexpert and are on the way to an expert in small scale rocketry.
@@Real28 Who reaches his goal first? Artemis to the Moon or Space-X to Mars? Everything else is trial and error, fall down, stand up and continue after taping your boo boos.
That transition for the OnShape sponsorship message was sooooo smooth. These little things are icing on the delicious cakes that are your videos. As a master’s student specializing in control systems, the way your approached the flight control is so inspirational. It’s one of the prime real life examples I have seen where you iteratively tweaked the parameters to make it more and more robust. Thank you for being a great teacher. So excited for the upcoming projects!
@@Indonesia01ian The fundamentals of control theory is same for all sorts of applications be it industrial robotics or model rockets. Only the system dynamics, objective, and environment change, so you have to adapt your controller to effectively work in that scenario. If you are an absolute beginner, start with Brian Douglas’ control system lectures and study about classical and modern control theory for Linear Time Invariant systems.
For the Big Scout, you can actually remove the springs from the RC car shock absorbers. If they are the oil type (not the friction type), you will get a nice long travel linear damper out of them. They're also easy to take apart and sometimes have a set of discs that can vary the dampening effect.
Many years ago when I was racing indoor RC cars, we also felt the need for dampers. For us, we used a solid rod (nylon) that fit inside another nylon tube. Then we put various thicknesses of silicon grease on the rod/tube to create a lightweight simple damper. After each race, you had to disassemble, clean, and regrease. You should easily get 3~6" of landing gear movement. Also, point the landing pads with the outside edges pointing up. You want to land on your heels, not your toes. Your rocket is stumbling on touchdown. Practice in the house dropping the rocket from .5m with a slight swing to practice landing. Use your camera at high speed to review exactly what is happening. Check the flight data recorder to review and adjust the damper length and thickness. Currently, your dampers have such little throw, they almost do nothing.
When you do a larger version of this, I hope you will consider putting in a cold gas thruster system to correct attitude on landing :) would allow you to fix those tilt and asymmetrical leg loading problems! You could use a butane gas canister if your rocket airframe is relatively heat resistant (I foresee the exhaust igniting it lol) as they are not so heavy for the gas volume unlike CO2. Using a heater circuit will allow for flashing liquid butane into gaseous to give you a good thrust level!
I think legs problem is - small sizes . Legs sizes smaller than the height of the rocket (>h/2). And it is dosent fixed to center of the rocket by support legs lines. To remove F-lever legs must looks like umbrella mechanism (with support lines).
Use propane instead of butane, it has more pressure and therefore produces more thrust, so you just need half the amount of gas and you can save weight. But it think using shock absorbers with a lot more travel may also solve the issue
Bravo to all of your efforts. As someone who designed, built and launched a simple two stage home-made (i.e. not a kit) rocket with a mouse payload, with heart rate radio telemetry, in my High School Physics class in 1972, I’m amazed at what you’re doing.
You might benefit from the VL53L1X - which is a very tiny laser rangefinder chip. I am in the Bay Area and I could help produce a PCB for you with wiring (for free :) that would allow you to hook it up into a small JST connector or something, it just uses an i2c bus. This way you can give your flight computer very highly accurate altitude data when it is about to land
What about the giant plumes of smoke in the way? I don't think that would work. Maybe an external low latency camera could track it down and forward its position estimate.
@@calloutman Generally the smoke is diffuse enough to not be a problem. The smoke has to be thick enough that multiple pulses return shorter values. Now the VL53L1X is only a 50hz chip max so yes its more susceptible to interference including just general IR emissions from the environment. Which reduces max range and accuracy I have used the sensor before and its best not to push it past 3 meters. However even a 3m/9.8ft range is long enough given BPS needs, there is more than enough to sacrifice some range by measuring at a slant. The weight of each sensor is also so low that multiple can be easily used for redundancy. If the mass budget grows and speeds increase there is also large lidars like the lidar light 3 hp that reliably get 40 meters at 5000hz and still even that unit only weights 38 grams including its housing, and is cheap at 150 USD.
@@nocare that is a really great point. One other idea could be to use RTK GPS to get centimeter level positioning. I don’t know if it would continue to work at the distances and accelerations of a rocket though. But ground stations you could possibly calibrate to the launch pad and if it lands in the same spot it should know within a centimeter where the ground is.
Great to see you moving to a different project right after you've successfully achieved a proper landing! I'm sure the Starship project will have you busy for a long time. Definitely not 7 years though lol. You've come a long way - this project should be much easier with all the knowledge you have now. In the long run though, are you going to make a liquid rocket engine? I'm not talking about a 'real' one with a turbopump and everything, but you could make a pressure-fed engine pretty easily nowadays, considering the fact that metal 3D printing is widely available and so are carbon-composite high pressure tanks. Obviously you can't achieve this now (or maybe you can, who knows!), but in 2-4-6 years you could have enough income to actually make a liquid fueled model rocket. Maybe even SpaceX would finally recognize you after all these years of trying to get a job there.
The biggest issues with liquid engines are that the propellants that give you easy engineering, are a pain to get (Hydrogen Peroxide, RFNA), and the easy to get ones are a pain to engineer (hydrocarbon/oxygen stuff, it gets hot)
@@rocketcello5354 well, pressure-fed liquid engines at a model scale have only one significant problem - a proper and non-destructive ignition sequence. Combustion instability is almost unheard of at such scales, so after startup the engine should work just fine. It is more than possible to make a small liquid rocket engine without having to use fuels/oxidizers that are hard to get. I've designed one as a student - I am a solid and liquid rocket engine design engineer after all. I'm sure Joe can figure it out as well!
Love your work and thanks a lot for the content. Just an FYI. An RC car coil over doesn't just spring back. It actually has adjustable rebound by changing the disc's/Pistons. It has holes to control it. Since you have 4 of them you could use very small ones. I would definitely research them before discounting them. If you have any questions I race them and have a business where I invented parts for them to make them tougher. Thanks again.
Blows my mind that you put that much work into the rocket and are still able to create quality videos. They feel very…calm and exciting both at the same time. I love the style!
Idea here!! I think the flex in the legs is fine because it absorbs the impact but it’s the rebound that bounces the rocket to the other side. So you could try letting the legs flex with a rebound damper to keep the legs from springing the rocket to the opposite side. So somehow design a linkage that flexes as the strut compresses then the strut will slow how quickly that flex returns. Just applying some bike knowledge here.
I am a newcomer to your channel and feel compelled to sing your praises. Your videos are well put together, interesting and fun. I also appreciate how you break things down for the layman. Good luck on the large rocket build!
I good way to release things under tension is with a three-ring release, as used on parachute cutaways. They reduce the force on your actuator significantly, allowing a small device to release a large load. Better than the nichrome solution.
The similarity of the audio between flight 6 and the Xombie in-air relight is amazing. There is a distinct noise of doppler shifting a rocket that is slowly moving away from the camera, and then coming back.
According to me, Possible solutions for this rocket's Instability are- 1) Keep Leg attached at higher top than lower end, due to which center of gravity will remain under pivot point. 2) While landing, instead using one trust propulsion, use four small trust propulsion's which will end turning/rotating moment of pillar like structure of rocket. 3) Use of liquid dampener than solid one, will absorb more sudden shocks.
For the legs: To avoid the issue of one leg hitting the ground before the other legs you might try one of two solutions: Some sort of linkage attaching to the leg on the opposite side to counteract similar to the philosophy of anti-roll-bars on car suspensions Another solution following the KISS method would be to have one single damper that all four landing legs act on instead of a separate damper for each leg. This way a single leg hitting first has a relatively stiffer damping force counteracting than all four legs at once.
Anything you can learn from is a successful flight. Even if it explodes. Learning from the failed flight imo is the best data you can get!. Keep up the amazing work!
I don't know shit about what you're doing but you present it all so enthusiastic and professional that i love watching you talking abracadabra ... keep it up because i can't wait ... Greetings from The Netherlands 👍😁
It just clicked what your Scout rockets reminded me of. The landers used in Robert L. Forwards sci-fi series "Roche World". His are a little stouter and only use a tripod landing gear configuration, because one of those landing legs is used to lower an airplane to the ground out of the side of the descent stage.
I completely forgot that Linear Dampeners are a thing you can just buy when suggesting the concept on the last video; glad they (somewhat) worked out! A (somewhat) simple way you could include them in the Scout design, would be to make the rods that lock in when extending the legs into dampeners. You could, basically, find a pipe that fits over the rod, plug up one end and give it a small air outlet. An improvised cylinder is, admittedly, not as reliably symmetrical as the ones you used in this, but it would give significantly more travel which could really help with those landings on one or two legs.
Thank you for letting us participate in your journey to landing a model scale rocket - I'll definitely call it a success! Looking very much forward to the model starship story. Will the full stack take off before the real one? The race is on!
One thing to take into account, is that if one leg touches the ground first, then the correction of the vectored thrust should be higher, because it now fighting along/against the efforts that bear upon this specific leg. And i don't think isn't neglectable, but if the its spring is loaded, then maybe you could have here a way to know 'how much' it is loaded. Not saying i could do it myself... Gl&HF, waiting for the scout F vid :)
Huh, onshape does indeed sound pretty cool, with real time collaboration. Just this week my colleague was working on an assembly, I had to wait to contribute so I couldn’t progress with it.
For the legs a longer damper can be created by using a tube that slides very tightly into another tube. Then use a thick grease or paste between the tubes to slow their movement. I've used these a few times in different models. If you had a longer damper that was a few inches, it likely would solve your problem with tipping over.
There's tunable oil piston dampeners too. Some you have to open and change a disc for the right resistance, others just twist. There's a trade off with tunability of a higher failure potential. The only thing I can think of to synch the legs is a cable drive linking them. Lot of torsion though.
I think if you look into the idea behind sway bar links and how they work on automotive suspension and apply this idea somehow to the legs so the legs are always more level to the ground than the body of the vehicle. This was my first immediate idea for a possible solution. Maybe a type of four way sway bar if that’s possible? I love your videos and how ambitious your projects are. Keep up the great work!
Amazing work!! A few ideas that might come handy on future revisions/ on the BFR :) Shock absorbers close to the body instead of on the tip of the arms, should help with bouncing and removes inertia from the legs for better deployment! Thrusting vectoring can help with throttle management with two or more motors so on the bigger rocket consider using more than one motor 😄
Watching the latest slow-mo shots, its clear that the tipping is the result of the legs opening. The rocket always tips towards the last leg to deploy due to its inertia. An additional damper close to the body should do the trick, but it would require a bit more time for full deployment tho.
You can still use the RC coilovers shock without the spring and it will behave as a regular damper with the added benefit of changing the silicone oil thickness to better control damping rates. Plus it has longer travel make it easier to compensate when a single leg touches the ground first
You, Sir, have destroyed my fascination of rockets going into the air. It's like watching a rerun of Harry Potter after watching Game's of Thrones. Now it's your videos that is capturing my fascination and the love for how long/far you can push a hobby. I applaud you. Thank you for your great videos and may your rockets go up, AND land safely on all 4 feet's (with the pointy side up) Cheers from Norway 🇧🇻
I like this constant improvement and great explanations. Somehow this whole rocket start and landing shows a huge amount of grace how smoothly things develope or tranistion. And each time it catches me again even though I had never been that rocket guy except for the early V2 Wernher von Braun developed and firework rockets. Great video and also a really nice sponsor that fits to the content seriously, not another cheap trick squarspace or eco flow bluetti poweroak crap
Brilliant project !!! To me, it's a raving success. As you say, this is a solvable problem with the legs and your time will be better spent when you build a scaled up version of this vehicle. The larger mass will likely help towards solving the issue.
Nice work as always Joe!!! Congrats again! For how saw all your work since the beginning and your problem solving skills this video was comforting. It gives as an idea of the great accomplishments this is. And we know for the background that you already started another amazing proyect! Keep the great work! PD. Now you deserve a grate vacation trip man! You rock! If you want we are glad to receive you here in Argentina for a grate vacation trip. 🇦🇷 🚀
You could use just the strut portion of the rc shocks. You had the entire coil over setup in the video, but it’s called a coil over because it’s over a linear shock. So might be an easier to access part going forward. Might’ve been what people were trying to suggest.
The rocket still seems to be tilted as it come into land. My first thought is that maybe the imu orientation is getting messed up by the rapid movements after you light the landing motor, but I imagine you would see that in the flight data. My suggestion would be to see if you can come up with a better way to measure the rocket's tilt relative to the ground so you're not reliant on the imu calculations, even if it's not as accurate as a high precision level or the imu. And yes, I realize that's very easy for me to say, but I do think that would help. Very cool to see all this progress Joe, and can't wait to see what comes next!
Good stuff! I think you are correct that with a larger version, some of these issues will work themselves out. I am curious whether you looked at using a 3-legged version.
I would move to a larger pad. Look into Teflon like larger pads. Secondly I am sure if you landed on smooth finish concrete - that alone has mom slope of 1” per 10’ min avg. soil is crazy, it could bounce out on a .75” rock. Kudos and awesome job on this project!!
I wanted to mention that when your legs are relased from the rubber band they fall with a very high velocity and this also increases the descent speed of your rocket and bounce and the heavier your legs are the more bounce it will create I am not an engineer It just came up in my mind I may not be correct but I think it was worth writing in comments
The "bouncy" was supposed to be replaced with a shock absorbance stabilizer. The leg stands needed to utilize at first into umbrella 🌂 unfolding fail terminal velocity resistance, before a kick stand poise. The rocket only needed to sustain a first fall high, a very low consistent long term flow of mini thrusters, to avoid that last moment acrobat crazy landing stunt. Avoiding fuel over burns. At low gravity or longer fall in planets. (China style.)
The Lunar Module used a metal honeycomb that would crush on landing to adsorb the energy of landing. The DynaSoar X-20 used a stretching wire damper to adsorb the energy of landing. I'd go with one of those two approaches.
Sir I believe you may have passed beyond "amateur" rocketry, and I am an engineer. Your SRB based soft-landing has significant impacts in drone and rocket based cargo delivery.
I know you used quotes but amateur is mean to signify why you are doing work rather than how good you are at it. Same as professional but opposite.
Expert vs inexpert, or Expert vs unqualified are suppose to be about experience.
They have definitely passed beyond inexpert and are on the way to an expert in small scale rocketry.
@@nocare He's doing it for youtube which is his job so technically it probably counts as professional rocketry :D
Significant impacts? Not good!
Aqui no Brazil voce pode ser o Elon Musk mas sem certificado eles nem te ouvem, e não é uma piada
Imagine he starts delivering packages with scout... hehe
Dude your commitment is insane. I gotta give it you man. You're amazing
What launches first. BPS Starship stack or the actual starship stack?
Better question: BPS Starship or Artemis?
@@Real28 LOL!
I dont think Artemis is ever going to launch. The Starship Human Landing System will probably get to the Moon first.
the REAL race xdd
@@Real28 Who reaches his goal first? Artemis to the Moon or Space-X to Mars? Everything else is trial and error, fall down, stand up and continue after taping your boo boos.
idk. But it seems that BPS will get to orbit before Blue Origin does
That transition for the OnShape sponsorship message was sooooo smooth. These little things are icing on the delicious cakes that are your videos. As a master’s student specializing in control systems, the way your approached the flight control is so inspirational. It’s one of the prime real life examples I have seen where you iteratively tweaked the parameters to make it more and more robust. Thank you for being a great teacher. So excited for the upcoming projects!
Hi do you know what forum that discuss and share about flight control? I am really interest and want to learn from basic 0
@@Indonesia01ian The fundamentals of control theory is same for all sorts of applications be it industrial robotics or model rockets. Only the system dynamics, objective, and environment change, so you have to adapt your controller to effectively work in that scenario. If you are an absolute beginner, start with Brian Douglas’ control system lectures and study about classical and modern control theory for Linear Time Invariant systems.
THE STARSHIP MODEL IN THE BACK LOOKS AMAZING! CANT WAIT :D
For the Big Scout, you can actually remove the springs from the RC car shock absorbers. If they are the oil type (not the friction type), you will get a nice long travel linear damper out of them. They're also easy to take apart and sometimes have a set of discs that can vary the dampening effect.
Imagine what this world would be like if everyone had this kind of work ethic, drive and dedication...
Idk I have none of those things
It’s called China 🇨🇳
And a huge Patreon community
@@NanoTLG they do look rather dedicated on genocides in their owm country and mine so, gotta give them that.
*time
Many years ago when I was racing indoor RC cars, we also felt the need for dampers. For us, we used a solid rod (nylon) that fit inside another nylon tube. Then we put various thicknesses of silicon grease on the rod/tube to create a lightweight simple damper. After each race, you had to disassemble, clean, and regrease. You should easily get 3~6" of landing gear movement. Also, point the landing pads with the outside edges pointing up. You want to land on your heels, not your toes. Your rocket is stumbling on touchdown. Practice in the house dropping the rocket from .5m with a slight swing to practice landing. Use your camera at high speed to review exactly what is happening. Check the flight data recorder to review and adjust the damper length and thickness. Currently, your dampers have such little throw, they almost do nothing.
Congratulations on the first landing! Can't wait for more flights! As always keep up the outstanding work👏👏
hi man!
sfs and ksp? Oh yeah!
@@Peardud KSP Coming Soon
@@Spaceflightinc Nice! I don’t even play ksp
At 4:52 I literally mouthed the words KA-BOOM and to my amazement we indeed had a big ka-boom on screen lol
I met Joe a few weeks ago and he was great to talk to. The upcoming projects sound so interesting and I can't wait for new updates to come out.
When you do a larger version of this, I hope you will consider putting in a cold gas thruster system to correct attitude on landing :) would allow you to fix those tilt and asymmetrical leg loading problems!
You could use a butane gas canister if your rocket airframe is relatively heat resistant (I foresee the exhaust igniting it lol) as they are not so heavy for the gas volume unlike CO2. Using a heater circuit will allow for flashing liquid butane into gaseous to give you a good thrust level!
I think legs problem is - small sizes . Legs sizes smaller than the height of the rocket (>h/2). And it is dosent fixed to center of the rocket by support legs lines. To remove F-lever legs must looks like umbrella mechanism (with support lines).
Use propane instead of butane, it has more pressure and therefore produces more thrust, so you just need half the amount of gas and you can save weight.
But it think using shock absorbers with a lot more travel may also solve the issue
Heavy
@@Henning_S. Plus Butane is a bastard gas!
Bravo to all of your efforts. As someone who designed, built and launched a simple two stage home-made (i.e. not a kit) rocket with a mouse payload, with heart rate radio telemetry, in my High School Physics class in 1972, I’m amazed at what you’re doing.
Huge congratulations for the Scout programs! The flights look so smooth now. Can’t wait for the next flights!
The RC shock absorber will work for you! You just need to put oil in them. They always comes dry. But once you put oil in it they stop being "springy"
You might benefit from the VL53L1X - which is a very tiny laser rangefinder chip. I am in the Bay Area and I could help produce a PCB for you with wiring (for free :) that would allow you to hook it up into a small JST connector or something, it just uses an i2c bus. This way you can give your flight computer very highly accurate altitude data when it is about to land
What about the giant plumes of smoke in the way? I don't think that would work. Maybe an external low latency camera could track it down and forward its position estimate.
@@calloutman Generally the smoke is diffuse enough to not be a problem. The smoke has to be thick enough that multiple pulses return shorter values. Now the VL53L1X is only a 50hz chip max so yes its more susceptible to interference including just general IR emissions from the environment. Which reduces max range and accuracy I have used the sensor before and its best not to push it past 3 meters.
However even a 3m/9.8ft range is long enough given BPS needs, there is more than enough to sacrifice some range by measuring at a slant. The weight of each sensor is also so low that multiple can be easily used for redundancy.
If the mass budget grows and speeds increase there is also large lidars like the lidar light 3 hp that reliably get 40 meters at 5000hz and still even that unit only weights 38 grams including its housing, and is cheap at 150 USD.
@@nocare that is a really great point.
One other idea could be to use RTK GPS to get centimeter level positioning. I don’t know if it would continue to work at the distances and accelerations of a rocket though. But ground stations you could possibly calibrate to the launch pad and if it lands in the same spot it should know within a centimeter where the ground is.
Yup VL53L1X is an excellent suggestion. Easy to interface, and you can change some settings with the sensor arrays to suit your requirements.
What programming language does he use
Think of all of the things that worked perfectly every time on that rocket. The staging, the TVC, throttle control. All reliably working. So epic!
Great to see you moving to a different project right after you've successfully achieved a proper landing! I'm sure the Starship project will have you busy for a long time. Definitely not 7 years though lol. You've come a long way - this project should be much easier with all the knowledge you have now.
In the long run though, are you going to make a liquid rocket engine? I'm not talking about a 'real' one with a turbopump and everything, but you could make a pressure-fed engine pretty easily nowadays, considering the fact that metal 3D printing is widely available and so are carbon-composite high pressure tanks. Obviously you can't achieve this now (or maybe you can, who knows!), but in 2-4-6 years you could have enough income to actually make a liquid fueled model rocket. Maybe even SpaceX would finally recognize you after all these years of trying to get a job there.
The biggest issues with liquid engines are that the propellants that give you easy engineering, are a pain to get (Hydrogen Peroxide, RFNA), and the easy to get ones are a pain to engineer (hydrocarbon/oxygen stuff, it gets hot)
@@rocketcello5354 well, pressure-fed liquid engines at a model scale have only one significant problem - a proper and non-destructive ignition sequence. Combustion instability is almost unheard of at such scales, so after startup the engine should work just fine.
It is more than possible to make a small liquid rocket engine without having to use fuels/oxidizers that are hard to get. I've designed one as a student - I am a solid and liquid rocket engine design engineer after all. I'm sure Joe can figure it out as well!
@@rocketcello5354 You can do okay with NOS and salami.
I think he actually got an offer a little while ago but turned them down to pursue his future youtube projects
Love your work and thanks a lot for the content. Just an FYI. An RC car coil over doesn't just spring back. It actually has adjustable rebound by changing the disc's/Pistons. It has holes to control it. Since you have 4 of them you could use very small ones. I would definitely research them before discounting them. If you have any questions I race them and have a business where I invented parts for them to make them tougher. Thanks again.
Blows my mind that you put that much work into the rocket and are still able to create quality videos. They feel very…calm and exciting both at the same time. I love the style!
Amazing how far you have come! Great Job!
Idea here!!
I think the flex in the legs is fine because it absorbs the impact but it’s the rebound that bounces the rocket to the other side. So you could try letting the legs flex with a rebound damper to keep the legs from springing the rocket to the opposite side. So somehow design a linkage that flexes as the strut compresses then the strut will slow how quickly that flex returns. Just applying some bike knowledge here.
I am a newcomer to your channel and feel compelled to sing your praises. Your videos are well put together, interesting and fun. I also appreciate how you break things down for the layman. Good luck on the large rocket build!
Good stuff
I good way to release things under tension is with a three-ring release, as used on parachute cutaways. They reduce the force on your actuator significantly, allowing a small device to release a large load. Better than the nichrome solution.
Wait..wait..WAIT
A SUPER HEAVY-STARSHIP THAT DOES WHAT?!
I only recently found your channel and must say I love seeing rocket science on a small scale.
The similarity of the audio between flight 6 and the Xombie in-air relight is amazing. There is a distinct noise of doppler shifting a rocket that is slowly moving away from the camera, and then coming back.
Nice stuff Joey B
According to me,
Possible solutions for this rocket's Instability are-
1) Keep Leg attached at higher top than lower end, due to which center of gravity will remain under pivot point.
2) While landing, instead using one trust propulsion, use four small trust propulsion's which will end turning/rotating moment of pillar like structure of rocket.
3) Use of liquid dampener than solid one, will absorb more sudden shocks.
RIP to my ears at 4:52.......... you my friends are a damn genius
That starship is gonna be SICK
I've been watching your videos since scout D, keep it up!
For the legs:
To avoid the issue of one leg hitting the ground before the other legs you might try one of two solutions:
Some sort of linkage attaching to the leg on the opposite side to counteract similar to the philosophy of anti-roll-bars on car suspensions
Another solution following the KISS method would be to have one single damper that all four landing legs act on instead of a separate damper for each leg.
This way a single leg hitting first has a relatively stiffer damping force counteracting than all four legs at once.
Amazing progress! Quick solution for the legs dampening - connect 2 dampeners in series.
Thank you.
Your Scout is a thing of beauty.
HELLO JOE BARNARD THANKS FOR THE VIDS
YOU ARE WELCOME TJ
Anything you can learn from is a successful flight. Even if it explodes. Learning from the failed flight imo is the best data you can get!. Keep up the amazing work!
It's nice one and your consistent approach made your project sucessfull. Thanks for sharing.
I don't know shit about what you're doing but you present it all so enthusiastic and professional that i love watching you talking abracadabra ... keep it up because i can't wait ... Greetings from The Netherlands 👍😁
Your combination of enthusiasm, optimism and pragmatism is inspiring and infectious, never stop what you're doing!
great work and showing how design development works
It just clicked what your Scout rockets reminded me of. The landers used in Robert L. Forwards sci-fi series "Roche World". His are a little stouter and only use a tripod landing gear configuration, because one of those landing legs is used to lower an airplane to the ground out of the side of the descent stage.
Got my BT-80 body tube last night, I have some 3d prints, but I might go with a laser cut balsa wood mount. Can't wait!
I wish I had found your channel sooner but going backing and watching this journey was crazy inspirational. Looking forward to future content!
Your work gives me crazy inspiration and more reasons why I should go into this science field
Joh, you are realy clever man. Good luck for your work!
Hmmm... Background Starship looks promising!
IT BIG, IT REALLY REALLY BIG
@@BPSspace can you make it bigger
@@BPSspace Make it bigger
Came across your channel randomly this month and started from the beginning. finally made it to the latest!
I completely forgot that Linear Dampeners are a thing you can just buy when suggesting the concept on the last video; glad they (somewhat) worked out!
A (somewhat) simple way you could include them in the Scout design, would be to make the rods that lock in when extending the legs into dampeners. You could, basically, find a pipe that fits over the rod, plug up one end and give it a small air outlet. An improvised cylinder is, admittedly, not as reliably symmetrical as the ones you used in this, but it would give significantly more travel which could really help with those landings on one or two legs.
Lol love the explosion. Love the idea of landing a rocket. It's not natural but can be done. Keep up the great work.
Thank you for letting us participate in your journey to landing a model scale rocket - I'll definitely call it a success! Looking very much forward to the model starship story. Will the full stack take off before the real one? The race is on!
One thing to take into account, is that if one leg touches the ground first, then the correction of the vectored thrust should be higher, because it now fighting along/against the efforts that bear upon this specific leg. And i don't think isn't neglectable, but if the its spring is loaded, then maybe you could have here a way to know 'how much' it is loaded. Not saying i could do it myself... Gl&HF, waiting for the scout F vid :)
Huh, onshape does indeed sound pretty cool, with real time collaboration. Just this week my colleague was working on an assembly, I had to wait to contribute so I couldn’t progress with it.
For the legs a longer damper can be created by using a tube that slides very tightly into another tube. Then use a thick grease or paste between the tubes to slow their movement. I've used these a few times in different models. If you had a longer damper that was a few inches, it likely would solve your problem with tipping over.
There's tunable oil piston dampeners too.
Some you have to open and change a disc for the right resistance, others just twist.
There's a trade off with tunability of a higher failure potential.
The only thing I can think of to synch the legs is a cable drive linking them. Lot of torsion though.
Thanks for the great summary. Scout has done its job.
Scout F has been a amazing experience. You are ready to scale the vehicle to larger version.
I think if you look into the idea behind sway bar links and how they work on automotive suspension and apply this idea somehow to the legs so the legs are always more level to the ground than the body of the vehicle. This was my first immediate idea for a possible solution. Maybe a type of four way sway bar if that’s possible? I love your videos and how ambitious your projects are. Keep up the great work!
Amazing work!! A few ideas that might come handy on future revisions/ on the BFR :)
Shock absorbers close to the body instead of on the tip of the arms, should help with bouncing and removes inertia from the legs for better deployment!
Thrusting vectoring can help with throttle management with two or more motors so on the bigger rocket consider using more than one motor 😄
Watching the latest slow-mo shots, its clear that the tipping is the result of the legs opening. The rocket always tips towards the last leg to deploy due to its inertia. An additional damper close to the body should do the trick, but it would require a bit more time for full deployment tho.
My goodness that camera/lens and lighting you use for your studio shots is amazing
Just love what you're doing mate ☺️
Pretty incredible work there.
This is absolutly amazing.
lookin forward to your future projects!
You can still use the RC coilovers shock without the spring and it will behave as a regular damper with the added benefit of changing the silicone oil thickness to better control damping rates. Plus it has longer travel make it easier to compensate when a single leg touches the ground first
You, Sir, have destroyed my fascination of rockets going into the air.
It's like watching a rerun of Harry Potter after watching Game's of Thrones.
Now it's your videos that is capturing my fascination and the love for how long/far you can push a hobby.
I applaud you. Thank you for your great videos and may your rockets go up, AND land safely on all 4 feet's (with the pointy side up)
Cheers from Norway 🇧🇻
The ascent and descent engine gimbaling is amazing!
I like this constant improvement and great explanations. Somehow this whole rocket start and landing shows a huge amount of grace how smoothly things develope or tranistion.
And each time it catches me again even though I had never been that rocket guy except for the early V2 Wernher von Braun developed and firework rockets.
Great video and also a really nice sponsor that fits to the content seriously, not another cheap trick squarspace or eco flow bluetti poweroak crap
Well done Joe. Looks like you had a blast.
They come in haaaaard 😂😂 beautiful!
Looks like the legs flipping out affects the stability too.
I love what this guy does so much that i watch the ads for full revenue, Keep up the hard work!
Incredible
Awesome rockets
Great poster in the background! I took the photo of Nexø II. 👍🏻
Brilliant project !!! To me, it's a raving success. As you say, this is a solvable problem with the legs and your time will be better spent when you build a scaled up version of this vehicle. The larger mass will likely help towards solving the issue.
Nice work as always Joe!!! Congrats again! For how saw all your work since the beginning and your problem solving skills this video was comforting. It gives as an idea of the great accomplishments this is.
And we know for the background that you already started another amazing proyect! Keep the great work!
PD. Now you deserve a grate vacation trip man! You rock!
If you want we are glad to receive you here in Argentina for a grate vacation trip. 🇦🇷 🚀
I would have loved to do something like this, but way easier to watch someone else do a great job of it instead. Keep it up, I love it!! 😄
Great stuff Joe!
Really well done good job. :)
Oh yes let’s go I see starship!
I love the starship taking shape in the background
I'm happy your moving on. A lot of your instability problems are definitely due to size, bilinear (def do trilinear) throttle control.
Such a cool project.
Loving the larger scale starship tease.
Just awesome!!! Been watching from the beginning. It is amazing watching your progress. Keep it up Joe!!!!
Have you thought about using hybrid engines to be able control thrust more precisely. Might help with reusability too.
Amazing work thanks for the inspiration
You could use just the strut portion of the rc shocks. You had the entire coil over setup in the video, but it’s called a coil over because it’s over a linear shock. So might be an easier to access part going forward. Might’ve been what people were trying to suggest.
The rocket still seems to be tilted as it come into land. My first thought is that maybe the imu orientation is getting messed up by the rapid movements after you light the landing motor, but I imagine you would see that in the flight data.
My suggestion would be to see if you can come up with a better way to measure the rocket's tilt relative to the ground so you're not reliant on the imu calculations, even if it's not as accurate as a high precision level or the imu.
And yes, I realize that's very easy for me to say, but I do think that would help.
Very cool to see all this progress Joe, and can't wait to see what comes next!
Good stuff! I think you are correct that with a larger version, some of these issues will work themselves out. I am curious whether you looked at using a 3-legged version.
3:36, That's only half the quote: "A good landing is any landing you can walk away from. A great landing is one where they can reuse the [rocket]"
Hella keen on the starship rocket!
This is so cool.
Thank you from China🇨🇳 I love you vdo 👍👍👍
This is not a hobby, this is passion
I would move to a larger pad. Look into Teflon like larger pads. Secondly I am sure if you landed on smooth finish concrete - that alone has mom slope of 1” per 10’ min avg. soil is crazy, it could bounce out on a .75” rock.
Kudos and awesome job on this project!!
I wanted to mention that when your legs are relased from the rubber band they fall with a very high velocity and this also increases the descent speed of your rocket and bounce and the heavier your legs are the more bounce it will create
I am not an engineer It just came up in my mind I may not be correct but I think it was worth writing in comments
love the projects and if you don't end up working for spacex or your own company I'll be disappointed you are very talented.
The "bouncy" was supposed to be replaced with a shock absorbance stabilizer. The leg stands needed to utilize at first into umbrella 🌂 unfolding fail terminal velocity resistance, before a kick stand poise. The rocket only needed to sustain a first fall high, a very low consistent long term flow of mini thrusters, to avoid that last moment acrobat crazy landing stunt. Avoiding fuel over burns. At low gravity or longer fall in planets. (China style.)
The Lunar Module used a metal honeycomb that would crush on landing to adsorb the energy of landing.
The DynaSoar X-20 used a stretching wire damper to adsorb the energy of landing.
I'd go with one of those two approaches.