Space Exploration and NASA Colonization Plans, Documentary on Our Future Voyages to the Universe

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024
  • Is it time for another 'giant leap?'
    In 2080, NASA scientists believe we can and must send people to Jupiter's and Saturn's moons.
    Space Travel Timeline of NASA:
    Exoplanet robotic missions and base camps on the Moon in the (late) 2020s.
    A crewed mission to Mars is planned for the late 2030s.
    Robotic missions to Tau Ceti (11.9 light-years away) in the 2030s.
    In the 2040s, robotic missions are launched to the TRAPPIST-1 system 40 light-years away.
    Robotic missions to distant stars in the 2050s.
    In the 2060s, a crewed mission will be launched to the Asteroid Belt between Mars and Jupiter.
    Mission to Jupiter (probably Callisto because it is sufficiently removed from Jupiter's intense radiation fields) in the 2070s.
    Crewed missions to Saturn's moons (likely Titan and/or Enceladus) in the 2080s.
    We will conduct a crewed mission in 2250 to locate exoplanets such as Proxima Centauri (4.2 light years away).
    In 2300, a robotic mission is launched to TRAPPIST-1, a system 40 light-years away.
    A crewed mission to distant stars halfway to the Milky Way's center in the late 2400s.
    Off-world colonization is a fascinating prospect, but it also carries a dire warning about humanity becoming a multi-world species.

ความคิดเห็น • 207

  • @natefontana5757
    @natefontana5757 ปีที่แล้ว +107

    “Sending the first woman and person of color” How about just saying first humans?

    • @michaelcopper7635
      @michaelcopper7635 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Amen !!!

    • @SkarKingg
      @SkarKingg ปีที่แล้ว

      Played out narrative unfortunately it's not going away anytime soon

    • @donaldwantz4071
      @donaldwantz4071 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      They were talking about landing those firsts on the moon. But yeah, I'm afraid these types of priorities show just how serious they aren't about space travel.

    • @vec306
      @vec306 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Agreed

    • @vidyaishaya4839
      @vidyaishaya4839 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      That's already been done. Space exploration is only interesting when there's a first something. The real tipping point in space will be when it becomes profitable. That's when we can stop worrying about hype.

  • @ConnorHanratty-on4fh
    @ConnorHanratty-on4fh หลายเดือนก่อน

    As a 25 year old who just might see a moon 🌖 landing in my lifetime makes me feel blessed to be a part of this generation and of humanity in general. So excited can’t wait.

  • @liamwoodman4950
    @liamwoodman4950 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    what about the human species becoming a multi world species needs a "Dire warning" DTTV?

  • @KingOfPatiala
    @KingOfPatiala ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I love this channel. No crazy background sound effects or music. I like these compared to others that have useless music.
    I listen to these while I am awake and at night. Puts me right to sleep.

  • @DonovanManny
    @DonovanManny 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks for sharing this massage, congratulations nassa for exploration and colonization

  • @PlanetXMysteries-pj9nm
    @PlanetXMysteries-pj9nm 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Very impressed with this video. I have always been interested in astronomy and physics. It was things like this that drove me to enter those professions. Thank you for feeding my insatiable curiosity about the universe and the wonders that we discove

  • @ShannaJosiah
    @ShannaJosiah 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    May the force be with you always and forever.Amen.

  • @Vile_Entity_3545
    @Vile_Entity_3545 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    It’s funny as I have got older, the thought of man going to Mars has lost its appeal. Even if in my lifetime they do go there, the best bit will be the landing and then pretty much just whether they get back or not. All they will be doing is testing a rock or soil and if they find a microbe hiding under a foot of crust....so what.
    There is obviously other life out there somewhere.
    2 trillion galaxies with all the stars in them and we are the only ones? I very much doubt it.

    • @vidyaishaya4839
      @vidyaishaya4839 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Only one what? Planet with life on it or advanced life capable of developing a civilization or species with interplanetary or interstellar space travel?

    • @daviddoherty7171
      @daviddoherty7171 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@vidyaishaya4839 agreed exciting

    • @michska53
      @michska53 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@daviddoherty7171 Not for our lifetimes i'm afraid unless something revolutionary gets invented or other more advanced species actually make contact with us, which is a shame. I was born too early

  • @blaircolquhoun7780
    @blaircolquhoun7780 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    We should consider FTL travel and make science fiction series like Star Trek, and science fiction novels like Starship Troopers, possible. That could mean actually building a true spaceship.

    • @crapisnice
      @crapisnice ปีที่แล้ว +3

      starship troopers is a disgusting metaphoric joke about american peoples genocide trough german forts. enough of german good christian slave, chosen one crap

    • @oldmanfromscenetwentyfour8164
      @oldmanfromscenetwentyfour8164 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What if the material we need to do that is on the Moon or Mars?

    • @vidyaishaya4839
      @vidyaishaya4839 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      FTL travel may or may not be possible. Even if possible it will likely be so energy intensive as to not be practical for more than sending radio communications.

    • @richardcaves3601
      @richardcaves3601 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Sorry, FTL is fiction and not possible in the real world. That's the physics. Even if it were possible, consider the relativity question.

  • @michaelcopper7635
    @michaelcopper7635 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Let’s try to tackle Venus’s atmospheric problems. I hope we’ve not giving up on this task “ Venues “ just because it’s hard. I thought that the nature of humans is to solve issues like this ! ??
    What the hell. I hope not !!!
    World Citizen

    • @rewar5870
      @rewar5870 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Better yet , solve the problems here on earth, then you really have no need to go anywhere else.
      Not to mention , you cannot hope to solve problems abroad if you cannot fix your home.

    • @formershadow
      @formershadow ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rewar5870 No, we will eventually need to go elsewhere. We don't have to do one or the other exclusively. Understanding Venus would absolutely help us, especially with global warming. If we don't figure out greenhouse effects, Earth will end up just like Venus.

    • @grgmetube
      @grgmetube 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rewar5870 Well humans have been trying to solve problems on Earth for millenniums but have hardly made any progress in overcoming our most basic problem: our animal nature. We can be intelligent but not very moral or concerned for the well-being of others outside our nation or tribe. We tend to just exploit them. Evolution has allowed us intellectual development but not moral development. In fact moral is like a dirty word when issues about abortion and sexual gender rights get caught up with politics. We will never really be able to sort ourselves out on fundamental things but ironically be able to sort ourselves out on far more complex technological and science things. That is provided that the fundamental blockers don't become so large that they block the science/technology in the end. I am all for trying to sort out problems on the Earth but I think we might become extinct if we focus on those alone. We need other civilizations separated from each other, so laws of natural selection can select the fittest. That way humanity may have the greatest chance. Some of those civilizations would become extinct others may thrive. Some others may be in between and if there could be very limited contact between them the ones that were only just existing might learn from those that were thriving. It is only the huge distances in space that would allow no contact or limited contact.

  • @garybobst9107
    @garybobst9107 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No cradle lasts forever, every bird must learn to fly. Yes, we're heading for the stars, watch our fire in the sky!

    • @qa1e2r4
      @qa1e2r4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not so fast. Rockets don't make us interplanetary civ. Currently you are living in a massive scam. Where everything you produce is used to keep you producing not to enhance your and future humans lives. We never go anywhere without first start thinking much past your own biological decay aka. Death. The reason we are not already on moon, Mars, Europe and the rest is because people prefer to drink themselves to death and deny anything they can to feel "achievement " you can't progress at such pace. This civilization is over already. Hopefully the next will be better.

    • @9852323
      @9852323 ปีที่แล้ว

      Unfortunately I’ll be long dead and forgotten by the time any of this happens.

  • @claudelebel49
    @claudelebel49 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Getting way ahead of ourselves.

  • @dumitrulangham1721
    @dumitrulangham1721 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    ❤❤❤❤❤ there ifs or buts! We have become interplanetary species! If we went to survive!!!

  • @jssomewhere6740
    @jssomewhere6740 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    If we can find faster ways to travel it will certainly speed up our expansion out into the solar system.
    Instead of focusing on establishing colonies on the planetary bodies, we should concentrate on building space habitats. For permanent residents. Habitats will meet our needs better than trying to adapt to different gravity, living inside very small domes or underground. We will also move out into the solar system much quicker if we establish a space economy. If people can get rich out in space they will push to get there.
    Its my opinion that humans will be mining asteroids in the belt by 2050s there will be a couple habitats orbiting in the belt by 2100. We will have habitats and mining operations in the Kiper belt. By 2150 there will be a huge laser habitat that is specially designed to accelerate and decelerate deep space ships. Using the laser to bring a ship up to speed it can achieve 20-30% SOL. That speed will allow us to send people to the closest systems. We will continue building large habitats at certain distances from each of the others. By 2250 we will have habitats up to almost a LY out by 2300 there will be a space economy that will rival that of earth. There will be large number of people on Mars, Ceres in astroid belt habitats, probally 1 of the moons of Jupiter, and another around Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. More Habitats in the outer belt and possibly on a dwarf planet or two. There will be habitats planned or being built in the Ort Cloud. We will build our way to the nearest solar systems. To get this far will take time id say 2500. I'm certain by that point we will have achieved much faster speeds. I don't believe we will ever have FTL travel. We will however find a way to achieve speeds that will near the speed of light, and we will discover shielding to allow us to travel at those speeds. Mining, farming, all the same things that drive Earths economy will drive the space economy. By 2500 or earlier those in space will declare themselves another nation or world. Mars will have also become independent from Earth establishing their own world nation. By 4000-5000 humans will basically live forever from this point forward.

  • @MargorieSarconi
    @MargorieSarconi 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice long term plans.

  • @derivative7117
    @derivative7117 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    This is cool but it depends on if humans on this planet don’t nuke each other out of existence in the next 20 years.

  • @RavishingSailor
    @RavishingSailor หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We are literally having a hard time bringing back two stranded astronauts in 2024. Trust me, we aren’t going to be doing any of this.

  • @paulbates1653
    @paulbates1653 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What I don't get is we can't even live in Antarctica.
    never mind Venus that's -170 at night and 300+ mid day. Am i missing something here?

    • @richardcaves3601
      @richardcaves3601 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, you're dead right and the vast majority of these comments are pie in the sky, or derivatives of sci-fi. We won't be going to Mars until we solve the toxic dust problem. Analysis of the robotic probes we've sent show that the dust on Mars is highly toxic and extremely small. Even a few specks of it are fatal. Until we invent a means of completely removing such dust, down to the atomic level, Mars is out for humans. Then there's the bone density problem, the human waste problem and the radiation exposure problem. For interplanetary travel, there's the time to travel the vast distances and the craft repair and maintenance problems. Sorry, but force fields, replicators and inertia dampeners are fiction.

  • @TheturtlesageWill
    @TheturtlesageWill ปีที่แล้ว

    Cheers from De Rider man

  • @JonathanRoss-jw6jc
    @JonathanRoss-jw6jc 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love science and space travel im a super nerd geek i guess

  • @NicholasNerios
    @NicholasNerios ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice long term plans. 👌

  • @JasonPaul-l6r
    @JasonPaul-l6r 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I agree 💯

  • @baldassarealessi1007
    @baldassarealessi1007 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you video interesting.

  • @tobyihli9470
    @tobyihli9470 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I believe that the future is more like huge space stations in lunar and Mars orbit, that spin, creating gravity.
    We could send people down to the surface of the moon and mars to work in shifts, and then bring them back home to the space station after a 12-24 hour shift. This way we can preserve our bodies in gravity.
    It doesn’t take much energy to push huge structures through space, especially if you are patient. We could build an enormous station here on earth, and send it into orbit with Starships. Then, we build them out here, in earth’s orbit. After that, we simply push it to mars. So what if it takes a long time to get there? The passengers could be living and working, in gravity. Starships could easily catch up to it for shift change and resupply. The center hub won’t spin, so the Starship could dock at anytime, while the rest of them are still under gravity.
    We’ll never adapt to life without one G gravity. It will take thousands, maybe millions of years to evolve. We need to give up, and build huge cities in the skies.
    On planet will need to be done in shifts. We’ll have to learn to optimize how much time we spend in low gravity. We will learn how long we can spend in it without harm, and then stick to it.
    We will never be able to live permanently in low gravity, without it doing permanent, grave damage. So don’t. Give up. Build cities in orbit that have artificial gravity. It’s THE ONLY WAY! Who knows, maybe we can go to planet daily, so long as we return to 1 G gravity every night. We just never know!

    • @RichardCourtney-
      @RichardCourtney- 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Adaption to lower gravity would be easier for the human body than adapting to the massive amount of radiation and charged particles that happens every time the sun lets loose. At least on the surface you can shelter underground. Launching tons of lead into space is impractical, and as of yet lightweight shielding isn't a thing. Right now, space station inhabitants suffer the highest potential amounts of radiation possible, unless of course you'd like to live close to the Chernobyl reactor.

  • @daviddean707
    @daviddean707 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    But beware the Antarctic roving vehicle which leaked heat overnight until its interior temperature was down to only 0 degrees.

  • @jasmineblack9778
    @jasmineblack9778 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    funny that people will look back in a hundred years and chuckle how little we are developed re technology in the 2020s

  • @jamesbarry1673
    @jamesbarry1673 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We're 200 years away from going to Mars

  • @2010jshafer
    @2010jshafer ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sure nice to imagine our survival. I dont think it will happen with whats going on today.

  • @allannakhle8555
    @allannakhle8555 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Pffft the slow state of the space industry wont even have a base on the lunar surface before 1240 even less travel to our closest solarsystem

  • @klove5765
    @klove5765 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    To many ads.

  • @FirestarHarrie
    @FirestarHarrie ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mars > Venus
    How can the Oceans content be tasted?

  • @jega157
    @jega157 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Everyone cool your jets.... we aren't going anywhere. Did you guys forget about water, O2, food?

  • @duncanwebb9450
    @duncanwebb9450 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I'll just wait until 5 April 2063.

  • @zeppelinbrown8347
    @zeppelinbrown8347 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why not just send the most qualified.

  • @MrAlkanet-nt9ic
    @MrAlkanet-nt9ic ปีที่แล้ว

    it is very suspicious that more than half a century and ginormous advance in computers and technology we are still unable to 'repeat' lunar landing... i am not at all convinced that we ever landed there

    • @richardcaves3601
      @richardcaves3601 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Don't say that in Buzz Aldrin's hearing - he punched out the last person who mentioned that debunked myth.

  • @icescrew1
    @icescrew1 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Elon certainly thinks so. Waiting on a Governmental organization... ?

  • @cliffordsantos9101
    @cliffordsantos9101 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Look we are having problems going back to the moon ..but why?

    • @nineofnine
      @nineofnine ปีที่แล้ว +2

      What problems is that??? Everything is going perfect with the Artemis mission... Step by step, although we will run out of a viable planet by then sooooooo...

  • @dooogy69
    @dooogy69 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Man there is alot adds 😠

    • @kenchesnut4425
      @kenchesnut4425 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      U got to get premium..u can't listen to TH-cam without it bro

  • @giorgosarifoglu953
    @giorgosarifoglu953 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great plan but unfortunately we live in a time where global economy is crashing fast so the good old days of Apollo and the shuttle where billions was flowing are well over. Maybe all this a pipe dream

  • @garybobst9107
    @garybobst9107 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mars has no magnetosphere, and life there would be short, ending with terminal radiation poisoning.

    • @vidyaishaya4839
      @vidyaishaya4839 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not if it's shielded under structures with thick walls or underground. Radiation on the Moon is a way bigger problem than on Mars.

    • @TVQuantumUniverse
      @TVQuantumUniverse  ปีที่แล้ว

      Precisely

  • @suissdagout5153
    @suissdagout5153 ปีที่แล้ว

    NASA , Kennedy center

  • @nicktaylor8032
    @nicktaylor8032 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Your time lines are wildly inaccurate mate. If these are your best guesses, I'd love to hear on what you based them.

  • @parrot1221
    @parrot1221 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why would you ever send it out and just not orbit the moon? Why you not send metals to drop? Wasted mission.

  • @SolarizeYourLife
    @SolarizeYourLife 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We cant even get all homes with solar panels on the roofs, and we want to send men to mars, what a joke...

  • @MERAJULJuL-g5i
    @MERAJULJuL-g5i 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Laesk

  • @kooncat9552
    @kooncat9552 ปีที่แล้ว

    They are never gonna do this,,never! Good talking point and money grubben scam though

  • @xyrenaxypot9100
    @xyrenaxypot9100 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    funny, nasa will never get anywhere.

  • @jamesruscheinski8602
    @jamesruscheinski8602 ปีที่แล้ว

    God's free will sovereign central authority.

  • @robertmayfield8746
    @robertmayfield8746 ปีที่แล้ว

    🤣🤣😂😂

  • @marktime48
    @marktime48 ปีที่แล้ว

    Such a poor representation of real scientific efforts being made daily by brilliant people. The garbage AI bot dialogue and synthetic narration at best makes this video marginally entertaining science fiction, and at worst a misleading representation of what the scientific community can actually achieve.

  • @shiplife2282
    @shiplife2282 ปีที่แล้ว

    تقول مكة إن يوجنا الإسلامية ستمنحك 80000 + 3 كرور + 4000 + 5 كرور روبية لك

  • @williamburroughs9686
    @williamburroughs9686 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Mars mission in the LATE 2030's?!?
    Frankly I will be supremely disappointed and surprised if we don't land on Mars before 2030.

    • @derekscanlan4641
      @derekscanlan4641 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      humans will absolutely NOT land on mars before 2030
      2040 is doubtful, at best

  • @mannymunoz4868
    @mannymunoz4868 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    May the force be with you always and forever.Amen.

  • @MasoudNyoni-g8o
    @MasoudNyoni-g8o 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks 👍 for sharing this massage, congratulations nassa for exploration and colonization

  • @JackDivision
    @JackDivision ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Such quality content guys, thanks and happy new year !

  • @antonnym214
    @antonnym214 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Fun fact: Uranus is colder than Neptune , even though it is closer to the Sun.

  • @likes2gofast
    @likes2gofast ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Say arteemus one more time😂

    • @nineofnine
      @nineofnine ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He's got a speach impediment... don't pick on him or he will have to explain AGAIN why he speaks like he does.

  • @JBrd79
    @JBrd79 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    But, is Sedna 3 times further out than Neptune or not???

  • @lightartis228
    @lightartis228 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    you need 3 things to be able to travel from between different solar systems and stuff:
    1)freeze sleep system that would preven you from getting old
    2)artificial gravity that would prevent your health from going down the crapper over long periods of time
    3)ai advanced enough to control and self repair ship for many years while humans would be sleeping...
    once those 3 things gets invented technically any part of universe will be within reach for humans...

    • @vidyaishaya4839
      @vidyaishaya4839 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Building a large cylinder spacecraft solves one and two. If large enough to be self sustaining, people will live there whole lives there wherever it goes. Artificial gravity is done by rotating the spacecraft at the right speed. Building such craft happens when we have mining and manufacturing technology on the Moon. From there it's only a matter of time. AI will be required to do that, so not a problem as AI technology is currently developing rapidly.

    • @alabamasteve8748
      @alabamasteve8748 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No, just need to develope a large spaceship that is able to stay sustain life and be of a strong enough material and technology to withstand the forces in space and space travel. From there a discovery will come that will allow us and the ship to move throughout the universe in a convenient way. The priorities are not there right now, it will take one man that will find, have the funds and make possible this. This universe is not what people think it is, and it will be within the next 60 years .

    • @michska53
      @michska53 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think you people are forgetting the most important issue. We simply don't have a fuel source to get that far, we would need to invent something that goes forever. Renewable fuel, we can't pack enough fuel that we know of in our time to get that far.

  • @jamesbarry1673
    @jamesbarry1673 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    200 years until we get to mars

  • @HanumanGahneshi
    @HanumanGahneshi ปีที่แล้ว +2

    ❤❤❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😂😂😂😂 AWESOME JOB AWESOME 💯💯💯💯 📃📄 DOCUMENTARY..... DREAM IS GOOD 💯 ON.....

  • @ViqiMuhammad
    @ViqiMuhammad 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Percepat nafigasi Agassi agesifkan seknifikan armada Agassi ciptakan nagasi sifkinus Agassi modrelisai armada terimakasih hebatkan ya sayang rada tertinggal nafigasi agassi❤❤❤

  • @cordaro8014
    @cordaro8014 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    How are we going to become multi planet species and we can't stop fighting?

    • @garybobst9107
      @garybobst9107 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      We'll take our baggage with us to the stars, but we'll have a better chance of beating extinction.

    • @vidyaishaya4839
      @vidyaishaya4839 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We'll go because both sides don't want the other to be first. It took the Cold War to get to the Moon the first time. Fortunately we're entering another cold war, and that will get us to Mars. It will also het us mining and manufacturing on the Moon. That's when space travel will become profitable, and that's the only way it can be sustained.

  • @davezentner7384
    @davezentner7384 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It may be a safer and wise choice send advanced A.I. programed Robotics to do Recon and build life support systems and habitats before allowing Humans on these long and unpredictable Journeys to Mars and other Planets.

  • @josenighthawk
    @josenighthawk 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    ALL Hollywood Science until you explain a viable faster-than-light, or Alcubierre, drive. .. If not, all these conjectures is like imagining cube-shaped planets!

  • @illusiveturtleix3884
    @illusiveturtleix3884 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    so what does everyone think about the likelihood of musk using the leo mass cap of starship to construct an orbital shipyard? to remove the need for planetary pollution, explore various new ship designs, specific vacuum propulsion systems etc...

  • @monicamattox72
    @monicamattox72 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    terraforming...exoplanet robotic missions...terraform Mars....Trappist One System, Alpha Centauri and beyond....I vote with the HUMANS.... :)

  • @smartwaffels
    @smartwaffels ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The only way for space travel to work. Is for a super advanced ai to solo trip it’s way to said destination and to have human dena on board so when they get to said destination the grow said human and implant the memories of the original. So there would be two of the same people one on earth and one on some other planet far far away

  • @nerdglider
    @nerdglider 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It’s always funny seeing star citizen concept art in videos like these lol

  • @jssomewhere6740
    @jssomewhere6740 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The idea of habitable worlds around M dwarf stars may be asking more than the little guys can currently deliver. M dwarf stars are touted to last for trillions to tens of trillions of years. That means this universe and those stars are still in diapers. There will be habitable planets around those stars come talk to me about it again in 3-400 billion years. If we are looking for habitable now for life now orange and yellow dwarf stars seem like the best spots to me. Orange dwarf stars depending on size could see double our stars existence up to 50 billion years or so. Any longer and your into the M dwarves. If we want to find life technology using life. I'd fo us on the orange dwarf stars that are substantially older than our star. Say 8-10 billion years. It took humans 4.4-4.6 billion years to evolve and develop into us. So we should look at stars that are the same age or older. This is why we dont see other intelligent life. At the beginning of the universe stars were exploding too much raidation. The second round of stars there were a few but not until the 3rd round did a large number become life friendly. Once again talk to me in 2-500 billion years when all the M dwarfs reach maturity and calm down, then comets and asteroid collisions will resupply water to the dried out worlds the collisions may get a vast number of the planets spinning even if very slowly.

  • @EfrenWolgamot
    @EfrenWolgamot 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    terraforming...exoplanet robotic missions...terraform Mars....Trappist One System, Alpha Centauri and beyond....I vote with the HUMANS.... :)

  • @ThomasDillon-z6u
    @ThomasDillon-z6u 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We have spilt the atom we are doomed.

  • @nineofnine
    @nineofnine 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nahhhh...its all c.g.i...🎉🎉🎉

  • @branislavtrninic4505
    @branislavtrninic4505 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hahahahahahahaha

  • @deepsy4587
    @deepsy4587 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I prefer that satellite or statellite should be modified,advanced etc........Humans are counting on technology.....e,g data internet etc....

  • @Jett_Heller
    @Jett_Heller ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Did you ask Robert Space Industries / Cloud Imperium for permission to use their Space Station image?

  • @jamessutherland762
    @jamessutherland762 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I just don't understand.....Artimus 1 sent dummies around the moon to check stress yet man has walked on the moon. Why???

  • @ЭлизаБайитова
    @ЭлизаБайитова ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Salkovskiy 🌏 Dobriy skazal🇰🇬🌎🇺🇸🌧️🇰🇿🌏🇦🇺🌧️🚀🌎🚀🌧️🕐👍

  • @ryoung1111
    @ryoung1111 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "Art-ee-mis"? Really? C'mon, guys. This is the age of Google!

  • @victorian-dad
    @victorian-dad 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Can't wait for the first TV reality survival show on the moon!😂

  • @cosminpatulea9518
    @cosminpatulea9518 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Vikings found the New World in years of 800-900. The next explorations happened in 1492, with many failed experiments. Now 50 years passed with the first landing on the Moon and no other human expeditions. The nations have different priorities as wars, conflicts, espionage, satellites, economic crises, new technologies, etc. The human progress is not linear ascendent as is presented in this documentary.

    • @stewiesaidthat
      @stewiesaidthat ปีที่แล้ว

      The Romans invented the steam engine in the 1st century AD.
      The first commercially successful engine that could transmit continuous power to a machine was developed in 1712 by Thomas Newcomen.
      Who knows how long before moon bases will be commercially viable.

    • @richardcaves3601
      @richardcaves3601 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@stewiesaidthatno that was the Greeks.

  • @JosephDent-qd9ih
    @JosephDent-qd9ih 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Get all the safety measures in place on Mars and would build a rescue principal on Venus/ a rapid deployment force already on Mars. Dr Dent astrophysicist Rocketeledyne owner.

  • @JosephDent-qd9ih
    @JosephDent-qd9ih 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There are more Moons than planets and seems to be the agriculture mighty food supplies move. Dr Dent astrophysicist Rocketeledyne owner.

  • @michaelcopper7635
    @michaelcopper7635 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I know this is getting way ahead of mankind. But we already have the means to make a Dyson sphere, with the astroid belt it’s between Mars and Jupiter. Let’s just get some robotic welders out there couplers to couple those metallic chunks of astroid together in one giant link energy or bread around the Sun. then make offices and research facilities inside of these asteroids the penguins are perfect. I hope we do this sometime in the future with humanoids or androids and support ships to keep them going.
    World citizen

    • @vidyaishaya4839
      @vidyaishaya4839 ปีที่แล้ว

      It will be easier to develop the Moon for operations to build space habitats in Earth orbit. Once built they can go anywhere. Near Earth asteroids will be used first, then the asteroids in the Ceres Belt, then the moons and asteroids in the Jupiter system, and so on.

  • @johnmahon1619
    @johnmahon1619 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sending the first woman and person of color..very nice of Nasa..i agree..just say humans for peat sake!

  • @AnthatiKhasim-i1e
    @AnthatiKhasim-i1e หลายเดือนก่อน

    The SmythOS can do so many things Multi it means creating content , backlinks etc #SmythOS

  • @user-ep3ck5re4o
    @user-ep3ck5re4o 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nothing new - boring 🤨😖😖😖

    • @TVQuantumUniverse
      @TVQuantumUniverse  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That could be the most beautiful comment we ever had yet! Thank you so much

    • @user-ep3ck5re4o
      @user-ep3ck5re4o 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Your welcome - no need for sedatives - just view you content and fall asleep in 5 minutes - especially with that pathetic AI dialogue - damn boring 🤨🤨🤨🤨😊

  • @JeremyHuff-e8t
    @JeremyHuff-e8t 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Space the final frontier we need to start to do more in space stop all the wars come together and build space stations and space ships and all races need to go to not only the moon and places in our system but outer space

  • @jamesbarry1673
    @jamesbarry1673 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We're 200 years from getting to Mars

  • @pomfennworks1
    @pomfennworks1 ปีที่แล้ว

    in 3000 years.... whos makeshift plan was this.

  • @baldassarealessi1007
    @baldassarealessi1007 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you

  • @dacnguyen1499
    @dacnguyen1499 ปีที่แล้ว

    if NASA want to build My own technology Invention ideas Designs aerospace Engineering Space Shuttle Bay Saucers project

  • @philisbell1457
    @philisbell1457 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amen why!

  • @alistairreed3514
    @alistairreed3514 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A MARS bar

  • @williamburroughs9686
    @williamburroughs9686 ปีที่แล้ว

    Missions to systems 40 LY's away?!? Why? We have a star system that is 4 light years away.
    Also it would take forever without FTL drives.

  • @helenelliott2375
    @helenelliott2375 ปีที่แล้ว

    they best invent gravity plating then

  • @mannymunoz4868
    @mannymunoz4868 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    May the lord be with you always and for ever

  • @dijonstreak
    @dijonstreak ปีที่แล้ว

    " Could it be HOSTILE. " ??!! ya gotta be kidding. !!!!!!

  • @rewar5870
    @rewar5870 ปีที่แล้ว

    2070s ,2080s....2200s....I really dont care....I will be dead.

    • @vidyaishaya4839
      @vidyaishaya4839 ปีที่แล้ว

      By the end of the next decade we'll be on the Moon, Mars, and have artificial habitats in Earth orbit. By the end of the century we'll be sending probes to other star systems. We've only just begun, but we've already lived through going to the Moon. That was a big deal. Permanent settlements are next. You'll likely only see the start of that, but that's also a big deal.

    • @gumpforest3073
      @gumpforest3073 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      finally someone with common sense..

  • @johndavid7065
    @johndavid7065 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ok but when are they actually gonna go to the moon?

    • @vidyaishaya4839
      @vidyaishaya4839 ปีที่แล้ว

      Soon, but certainly not on schedule.