Why don’t they use does tractors to fight the Russian’s why are they screaming for tanks and infantry fighting vehicles🤣…facts is Ukraine doesn’t have any military equipments they are at least 68% demilitarized thats me been fair because at the moment no fuel for their tanks😂
You know Russia is not that rich but they are full of resources so they are able to build many modern powerful vehicles but the can not mass produce it bc of money
More recent T90 variants actually deserve the name T90. Early variants of the T90 were simply the next modification of the T72 and were supposed to be named accordingly. After the total annihilation of T72s during the iraq war they decided to rename it T90 cause the T72s reputation was completely ruined while being their main tank to export.
The Russians have great and powerful equipment... sadly how they were tactically used and internal issues with the military morale is a major weakness.
How about a list of top 10 Russian vehicles that don’t rely on repurposed American microprocessors. It might be a short list though limited to old Soviet era equipment.
@@redblueyankee8343 Each tank and each armored vehicle has small narrow openings either on the side of the vehicle or on the upper side which serve to draw in air due to engine cooling. The Molotov cocktail is liquid like water and can reach every and the smallest opening on the tank, so it can very easily reach the engine and set the tank on fire. No vehicle is immune to a Molotov cocktail.
I thought this was an april fools joke at the first, saying the SU-57 and T90 were actually good vehicles (SU-47 has a big radar signal compared to the f-16 and f-15. T90 was destroyed by a Bradley.)
not enough amount and preventing abandoned T14 get captured and sended to US, China reversed engineer alot soviet technology from abandoned tank during the Sino-Soviet border conflict.
I'm just going to comment WHILE watching this. Not saying this stuff isn't good military hardware BUT.........none of this is holding up well,in the current conflict. I'm confused. The Russians are known for quality stuff. I used to think the destruction of their equipment in previous conflicts was because someone else was using it and if the Russians were using it,it would be a different story. Judging by the current state of affairs,I was wrong. And I have a question. If the Armata is so great,why isn't it being used? Now would be a great time to find out!
There are only a dozen or two of these tanks that are built. Further production is not possible since these tanks require import parts that are banned to sell to russia. Even if russians could produce this tank under the current circumstances, it would not be a mass-production. The price is too high and the technology is too complicated to have the actual mass-production. We won't see these tanks at all
@@antonmakarenko3271 I heard,years ago,that only 200 were planned. I would like to see it action against NATO mbts. I don't think it would fair any better than the others,actually. Undoubtedly,the Russians would hold them close to Moscow as a last defense. The point is,the Big Red Machine is a paper bear and the time to settle this once and for all is fast approaching. All this talk about them using Nuclear weapons is hot air.
@@djkinetic2020 more like Soviet tanks. Some russian tanks are captured, but the numbers might be not significant. Also Ukraine has a lot of Soviet tanks that are modernized with Ukrainian parts (Bulat, for example, which is Ukrainian modification of T-64)
Yep, it was the same shit with the Soviets when they convinced the rest of us that their Mig-25 was the best jet around...until a pilot defected and the jet was reverse engineered to reveal a clunky piece of junk
Then what are all those fancy anti-tank weapons that NATO is using in that war against Russia? That Javelin and others that NATO is giving to Ukraine are not fancy expensive toys? Of course that fancy, new and effective weaponry is one of the factors.
@@mosnicolae1678 Every country that is giving weapons to one side of a conflict that is not concerning them is giving the full moral right to the other country (Russia) to give some nasty weapon to the enemies of that country which is putting its nose there. And those NATO countries, they sure have enemies...My country is in NATO too, but we refuse to give any weapon to Ukraine, and by our law, any citizen of my country that will go to fight as a volunteer in some war will be punished with prison time.
@@ozymandiasnullifidian5590 a dictator left unchecked won't stop there. History tells us that. They will go further and further until it is YOUR country that's on the block. What's next? Poland, Germany, France, Sweden? If everyone sits back and turns a blind eye this won't stop. History tells us dictators don't stop until they are stopped. Sitting back saying nothing or doing nothing does not help solve brutality.
People really don't know that russia is using 20% of it's power to defeat an enemy using more men these vehicles however are useless sometimes in some cases
@@rumble5352 Has done nothing to russia? sorry but you forgot Nazis harassing russians in ukraine violent overthrow of the pro russian gov in 2014, they did nothing wrong Azov war crimes in donbas While yes russia is doing something bad with the invasion, it has the right to protect it's civillians and stop nazis from bullying the donbas
So Russia gets to take a piece of someone else's country, implement some random government that answers to Russia and doesn't expect the people of that country to try to figh back to over throw them? Are you serious? And even if there were some bad people in Ukraine committing crimes against Russians who live there, Russia thinks that's justification for bombing the entire country and killing innocent citizens of that country? Guess what? There are likely certain segments of Russia's population that are committing crimes against some other groups of people. Would a country be justified in destroying Russian cities over that? This was just a lame excuse for Putin to start a huge war just because he felt like it.
As someone who fought in wars for the US yes their equipment is made to win battles. They get it. They never listened to us infantry and what we needed Russia whatever they need they get them and adapt for their soldiers. If you think they don't you're listening to the wrong people.
Russian armor is the best in the world as long as it's in Red Square on parade, real pretty and such, put it in a battlefield with inept crews and crappy logistics and it's not worth a S*%# as the current conflict is proving.
@@thaminduKavinda I hope that some solution will be found. Ukraine can't be in NATO, that's the main thing, NATO cant expand to Russia by force, maybe Russia showed signs of weakness, but that is still the country with the biggest arsenal of nuclear weapons, and only someone insane will go and probably trigger globar thermonuclear war in which there will be no winners. But, it will be interesting if Russia expresses a wish to be a member of NATO...that was done at the beginning of this century, but of course, they were refused, because the USA wants to be the strongest country in NATO.
@@thaminduKavindayou do know how invasion works? Obviously ukriane can’t defeat Russia so Tehy send their military to its cities so it’s own civilians can join the war also Russia is attacking its military but since it’s all over the city they have no choice but to bomb it’s people and military also u don’t take useless land you first take down your enemy military then you go take everything else what’s Russia right now it’s doing dosent want to take all they want to be there and let Ukrainian military get to them so they can run out and once that happens Tehy take everything else that’s how invasion works you take all the military or you stay in one place and let them come to you so once their gonna you take everything they got now since their defense have been wasted up and their attack troops as well
@@geesehoward700 Son ukraine is only getting old gen T-90s and T-72s those are shit but the T-14 is very hard to fight No amount of javelins or stingers will save you from a Su-57 and a T-14
Ukraine has soviet era vehicles they are doing well because they are the defender and they have western supp If Russia used most of these on the list (t-14, Su-57) ukraine would never see the light of day
Best military channel
Storing the ammo with the crew has been proven a major design flaw I think..
First version of Borey had 16 slbms and newer Boreys have 20 slbms
Yes they' re so great the tractors are feasting on their carcasses.
Why don’t they use does tractors to fight the Russian’s why are they screaming for tanks and infantry fighting vehicles🤣…facts is Ukraine doesn’t have any military equipments they are at least 68% demilitarized thats me been fair because at the moment no fuel for their tanks😂
@@elozinoemeovrode9779 how’s winning the wars in 5 days man? Lol you Russian sympathizers are so sad.
They make GREAT targets!
@@elozinoemeovrode9779 dude calm down were just making fun of it
You know Russia is not that rich but they are full of resources so they are able to build many modern powerful vehicles but the can not mass produce it bc of money
Wonderful weapons,very capable and easy to use and maintain.Principal of pragmatism.
The gaz is not the licensed copy of the italian Iveco Lince?
You should never put Russia and great in the same sentence. Russia and below average is more like it.
😂😂😂 who told you this? Western propaganda
Fantastic. Pity about the tyres.
More recent T90 variants actually deserve the name T90. Early variants of the T90 were simply the next modification of the T72 and were supposed to be named accordingly. After the total annihilation of T72s during the iraq war they decided to rename it T90 cause the T72s reputation was completely ruined while being their main tank to export.
I highly doubt the engine in the Gaz 2975 is air cooled...
Love 🇷🇺 Russia from india🇮🇳
The Russians have great and powerful equipment... sadly how they were tactically used and internal issues with the military morale is a major weakness.
cry more ,The hypocritical and cowardly West, 40 countries combined fear Russia
От куда это взяли с духом.У нас сила духа очень мощна поверьте.
How about a list of top 10 Russian vehicles that don’t rely on repurposed American microprocessors. It might be a short list though limited to old Soviet era equipment.
Dolboeb?
Nice joke 😂
Ural trucks are iconic
SUPER...
Why do we still think the T-90 is remotely decent? You can disable it with a molotov cocktail
I'm basing that off the thumbnail
You can also disable Leopard and Abrams with a Molotov cocktail.
@@igorzlatanovic8286 Proof?
What M1 Abrams was stopped by a molotov cocktail?
It cannot
Merkavas however yes the only MBT
@@redblueyankee8343 Each tank and each armored vehicle has small narrow openings either on the side of the vehicle or on the upper side which serve to draw in air due to engine cooling. The Molotov cocktail is liquid like water and can reach every and the smallest opening on the tank, so it can very easily reach the engine and set the tank on fire. No vehicle is immune to a Molotov cocktail.
Can this pro-ukraine dudes can leave ? It's military education channel not a political one . 🙄
TIGR uses rws 12.7 mm Kord...
You spoke a bit too soon for the Slava Class😂
The new Russian horse and bugie bow and arrow was excluded.
I thought this was an april fools joke at the first, saying the SU-57 and T90 were actually good vehicles (SU-47 has a big radar signal compared to the f-16 and f-15. T90 was destroyed by a Bradley.)
f22 RCS is 0.0001
SU57 RCS is 0.01
What is RCS
@@sakethvarma5079 means radar cross section
also SU57 doesn't exist they only have like 2 of them
@@michelmilaneh8963😂They got more then two they have 74 do research kid 😂
T90 is the best sales agent for Bayraktar :)
Do you know how many Bayraktars were shoot down ?
No Bayraktar TB2 has destroyed any ghost T-90
Well majority of them are T72 and T90A
Kronshtadt Orion drones of Russia is more than an equivalent of Bayraktar TB2 drones.
@@rinneganitachi4840 Do you know how cheap they are in comparison to a tank?
Next Do a greatest
"tractor of all time"
why hasnt the t14 been used in ucraine
Because they don’t have enough of them to create a proper unit
not enough amount and preventing abandoned T14 get captured and sended to US, China reversed engineer alot soviet technology from abandoned tank during the Sino-Soviet border conflict.
@@yarnickgoovaerts they don't even have enough of T-90. Most of the burned russian tanks in Ukraine are T-72.
It’s been used in Syria
@@mbtenjoyer9487no it hasn’t 😂 why would they deploy a vehicle when they only have 12….
I'm just going to comment WHILE watching this. Not saying this stuff isn't good military hardware BUT.........none of this is holding up well,in the current conflict. I'm confused. The Russians are known for quality stuff. I used to think the destruction of their equipment in previous conflicts was because someone else was using it and if the Russians were using it,it would be a different story. Judging by the current state of affairs,I was wrong. And I have a question. If the Armata is so great,why isn't it being used? Now would be a great time to find out!
There are only a dozen or two of these tanks that are built. Further production is not possible since these tanks require import parts that are banned to sell to russia. Even if russians could produce this tank under the current circumstances, it would not be a mass-production. The price is too high and the technology is too complicated to have the actual mass-production. We won't see these tanks at all
@@antonmakarenko3271 I heard,years ago,that only 200 were planned. I would like to see it action against NATO mbts. I don't think it would fair any better than the others,actually. Undoubtedly,the Russians would hold them close to Moscow as a last defense. The point is,the Big Red Machine is a paper bear and the time to settle this once and for all is fast approaching. All this talk about them using Nuclear weapons is hot air.
Ukraine also uses Russian tanks.
@@djkinetic2020 true, but nice videos of T64's putting a hurting on their counterparts from Russia. All in how you use them"I guess.
@@djkinetic2020 more like Soviet tanks. Some russian tanks are captured, but the numbers might be not significant. Also Ukraine has a lot of Soviet tanks that are modernized with Ukrainian parts (Bulat, for example, which is Ukrainian modification of T-64)
They're food for ukrainian tractors!
they will choke on that food.
I don't think next gen tanks are food
Well they are good weapons but Logistics, Training and Communication is what matters.Look at US weapons in Yemen🤣
Ahahahah! Top Ten military vehicles? From Rússia? Ahahahahahahahha
If they are taking losses from a strong enemy there is nothing wrong
Israel lost 33 merkavas to lebanese kornets
Uraaaaa
Tell that to St. Javelin
Saudi's also have javelin but can't defeat Yemen. Javelin is only a defensive weapon.
Top 10 Greatest Target Practices.
Paper military, all these ,,fearsome" vehicles are russian propaganda
Yep, it was the same shit with the Soviets when they convinced the rest of us that their Mig-25 was the best jet around...until a pilot defected and the jet was reverse engineered to reveal a clunky piece of junk
you are saying next gen top of the line vehicles are prop?
Air cooled Cummins🤦🏻♂️
Fancy and expensive toys, don't make an effective military, as we've seen in Ukraine.
Then what are all those fancy anti-tank weapons that NATO is using in that war against Russia? That Javelin and others that NATO is giving to Ukraine are not fancy expensive toys? Of course that fancy, new and effective weaponry is one of the factors.
@@ozymandiasnullifidian5590 Bayraktar is not new&fancy, but is effective.
@@mosnicolae1678 Every country that is giving weapons to one side of a conflict that is not concerning them is giving the full moral right to the other country (Russia) to give some nasty weapon to the enemies of that country which is putting its nose there. And those NATO countries, they sure have enemies...My country is in NATO too, but we refuse to give any weapon to Ukraine, and by our law, any citizen of my country that will go to fight as a volunteer in some war will be punished with prison time.
@@ozymandiasnullifidian5590 a dictator left unchecked won't stop there. History tells us that. They will go further and further until it is YOUR country that's on the block. What's next? Poland, Germany, France, Sweden? If everyone sits back and turns a blind eye this won't stop. History tells us dictators don't stop until they are stopped. Sitting back saying nothing or doing nothing does not help solve brutality.
We know how Abrams is good under Yemen Rebels
Pl keep it at less then 3 minutes
😆 😂 🤣 😅
💪🇺🇦
Z
@@bazz6490 Bayraktar!
Lol you have no idea how Yemeni Rebels even without Javelins, NLAWs and TB2 have M1 Abrams loo
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 💪 Russia 🇷🇺
People really don't know that russia is using 20% of it's power to defeat an enemy using more men
these vehicles however are useless sometimes in some cases
Why is Russia using any percentage of its power to destroy a country that has done nothing to Russia? Evil?
@@rumble5352 Has done nothing to russia? sorry but you forgot
Nazis harassing russians in ukraine
violent overthrow of the pro russian gov in 2014, they did nothing wrong
Azov war crimes in donbas
While yes russia is doing something bad with the invasion, it has the right to protect it's civillians and stop nazis from bullying the donbas
So Russia gets to take a piece of someone else's country, implement some random government that answers to Russia and doesn't expect the people of that country to try to figh back to over throw them? Are you serious? And even if there were some bad people in Ukraine committing crimes against Russians who live there, Russia thinks that's justification for bombing the entire country and killing innocent citizens of that country?
Guess what? There are likely certain segments of Russia's population that are committing crimes against some other groups of people. Would a country be justified in destroying Russian cities over that? This was just a lame excuse for Putin to start a huge war just because he felt like it.
The Russians had more than 60% of their available combat power set up for the Ukrainian invasion.
@@jeffreyprezalar220 how 60%???? only 200k men are deployed
Russia has great military vehicles? 🤣
Ukriane is gettin clapped 😂😂😂
As someone who fought in wars for the US yes their equipment is made to win battles. They get it. They never listened to us infantry and what we needed Russia whatever they need they get them and adapt for their soldiers. If you think they don't you're listening to the wrong people.
@@WorldPeaceiu89that's like being down by 100 and bragging about getting a field goal.
us 👎👎👎👎
@@YankeeCommieSomething got lost in the translation. Try again.
Russian armor is the best in the world as long as it's in Red Square on parade, real pretty and such, put it in a battlefield with inept crews and crappy logistics and it's not worth a S*%# as the current conflict is proving.
That's the Russia's problem: excellent engineering but horrible management
Russian armor is also the one being used by Ukraine.
Great only in Russia. Bang average in Ukraine.
I love western propaganda
Russians manning their equipment show very poor performance. Poor training & leadership
American components.
😂😂😂
Dolbaeb
Next is tractor battalion of ukraine😆😆😆slava ukraina
Can some one please proof read the script pre-post? It takes kill the immersion. lol
Latest in the factory, obsolete on the battlefield
Yet cannot defeat Ukraine. Lol
They cannot defeat NATO, Ukraine is just a puppet, a pawn of NATO, the USA is arming them and making them fight in a dirty war instigated by the USA.
@@ozymandiasnullifidian5590 i hope Russia win the war. If not NATO will expand to Russia too.
@@thaminduKavinda I hope that some solution will be found. Ukraine can't be in NATO, that's the main thing, NATO cant expand to Russia by force, maybe Russia showed signs of weakness, but that is still the country with the biggest arsenal of nuclear weapons, and only someone insane will go and probably trigger globar thermonuclear war in which there will be no winners. But, it will be interesting if Russia expresses a wish to be a member of NATO...that was done at the beginning of this century, but of course, they were refused, because the USA wants to be the strongest country in NATO.
@@thaminduKavindayou do know how invasion works? Obviously ukriane can’t defeat Russia so Tehy send their military to its cities so it’s own civilians can join the war also Russia is attacking its military but since it’s all over the city they have no choice but to bomb it’s people and military also u don’t take useless land you first take down your enemy military then you go take everything else what’s Russia right now it’s doing dosent want to take all they want to be there and let Ukrainian military get to them so they can run out and once that happens Tehy take everything else that’s how invasion works you take all the military or you stay in one place and let them come to you so once their gonna you take everything they got now since their defense have been wasted up and their attack troops as well
Gee, it's suuuch a shame any Nato shoulder fire missile can wipe out whole columns of these...
Top 10 russian military vehicles Ukraine now have more of
Most of these on the list are next gen
most of them aren't used in this war
@@BIGDADDUI so when will russia be re-arming ukraine with these new types?
@@geesehoward700 Son ukraine is only getting old gen T-90s and T-72s
those are shit
but the T-14 is very hard to fight
No amount of javelins or stingers will save you from a Su-57 and a T-14
@@BIGDADDUI all 5 Su-57?
@@geesehoward700 Not 5 once they are in production these war machines will eat up tracktors and enemy vehicles
Z
This all very weak against Ukrain
Ukraine has soviet era vehicles
they are doing well because they are the defender and they have western supp
If Russia used most of these on the list (t-14, Su-57) ukraine would never see the light of day
@@BIGDADDUI Russia has no money to build enough T14s and Su57s. Not before the war and certainly not after the war.
@@mosnicolae1678 indeed
The Ukrainian army must see this as the funniest thing on utube. Most of These weapons are littering the Ukrainian country side as junk.
Actually these Russian military vehicles are great, although the operator are the one who made these vehicles look weak.
Gaz Tigr destroyed in big Numbers in Ukraina
Z