Very clear explanation. I was always attaching the links of examsolution video for my students to look into a topic again. Research says that students are engaging more when the teacher works everything on the board. This is what is missing. Working out in real-time is very powerful. It is what made the older video soooo good. Thank you
in the question u can see there r arrows above the letters (like OA has an arrow on top of it). that arrow shows the direction, like from O -> A. then u can put the arrow on the diagram from O to A
OABC is a parallelogram. By definition a parallelogram's diagonals intersect each other at their common midpoint. Boom done. It doesn't need proving. some properties of geometric shapes are simply axioms and you'd have to rely on other properties to be able to deduce these properties too so you're essentially trying to prove an assumption by making another assumption. Absolute bollocks i tell you
i mean hes still conveying what he has to say well so i dont really see the issue personally. doesnt make much of a difference to me, but yea the previous guy has i guess a soothing quality to his voice but tbh it rlly doesnt do much, this guy is just as good at explaining
Very clear explanation. I was always attaching the links of examsolution video for my students to look into a topic again. Research says that students are engaging more when the teacher works everything on the board. This is what is missing. Working out in real-time is very powerful. It is what made the older video soooo good. Thank you
fantastic video. been struggling with this in maths and this video has helped lots. cheers
Thanks for this video, now can apply it to some tricky questions in my homework!
Glad it was helpful! :)
Cheers mate so clear the textbook had me lost
No problem buddy.
clear explanation thank youu. keep doing great job
Well done. Good, clear explanation.
Very clear. Thanks.
Very useful hack thanks !
Thank you!
Great video can you show how to prove that two vectors have a certain ratio
great, systematic method. thanks my guy
Well done Michael, my brain hurts, but well done.
😅
@@ExamSolutions_Maths Clear explanations. Thanks
How do I identify a focus point inorder for me to equate mu and lambda and solve simultaneously?
Thank you Sir
Thank you so much :)
Thank you
amazing video young sir! is this the hardest a vector question can get? also how many marks is this?
no there r more harder questions in vector
@@salwaimran3455 Please could you link some more questions bro! . I wanna try some as I have exams coming up. Cheers
Thanks 😁
How do you know what direction to put the arrow in?
if its like AB is a, then the arrow should point to B as its going to B
in the question u can see there r arrows above the letters (like OA has an arrow on top of it). that arrow shows the direction, like from O -> A. then u can put the arrow on the diagram from O to A
Thanks guys
amazing
Damn bro u OG
hi i thought exam solutions was an old man? miss him.
Don't worry the new guy is just as good
@@Trus-Ty where did he go :(((((
@@shresthashreya5418 he died ☹
@@JustRealAsf no way :o
@@shresthashreya5418 he left, now michael is taking over.
I don’t understand any of this at all can someone recommended me what I should look at to conceptualise this
Please I don't undestand why you are using scalar constants
bcos theres an unknown coefficient, hence we are using scalar constants to prove it
I thought Lamba was a car?
thank u
this made no sense
Why is there non maths stuff in this vectors playlist? 😭 (after this video)
There's maths in the next video in the playlist for me.
❣️
OABC is a parallelogram. By definition a parallelogram's diagonals intersect each other at their common midpoint.
Boom done. It doesn't need proving.
some properties of geometric shapes are simply axioms and you'd have to rely on other properties to be able to deduce these properties too so you're essentially trying to prove an assumption by making another assumption. Absolute bollocks i tell you
relax my friend, you talk so stiff. the reason why the original gentleman was so good is that his tone, voice and words were relaxed and informative.
i mean hes still conveying what he has to say well so i dont really see the issue personally. doesnt make much of a difference to me, but yea the previous guy has i guess a soothing quality to his voice but tbh it rlly doesnt do much, this guy is just as good at explaining
why u longing the explanation