YEAH! RIGHT OUTTA A HORRIFIC SCI FI MOVIE. THE WORST THING ABOUT THIS IS ITS REAL LIVE ! IDIOT'S ! INTELLECTUAL ONES AT THAT ! THAT GO TOO FUCKIN FAR ... .....
@keith moore You know what amazes me the most? People keep whining about Dem run cities. Yet, refuse to get off their lazy fat arses and go and vote. That is all you people have to do, is get out and vote. And do not carry on about a stolen election and all that crap. because that is all there is, crap. No evidence, and a Million Dollars waiting to be collected if that person can provide evidence. Funny that, no one has come forward to provided evidence and collect. So, get of your bum, and get all your other peoples bums off the seats and go and Vote GOP, and then see what they can do. EASY!!!
@keith moore That is right, all they care about is their seats in Govt where they get rich. In Australia, it is compulsory to vote, so we get a 96% turnout, so they have to appeal to most people to win their seat in Govt. Too few Americans vote, a record 66% voted in 2020, what happened to the other 34%? As Ben Franklin said, "I have given you a Republic, it is up to you to keep it.". You get the Govt you deserve. Remember that. Cheers
@Robert Sears "Clean" nukes are a myth. The high-energy ionizing radiation from the nuclear detonation and fireball activates ordinary elements in the soil, making them radioactive. The more matter you have next to the detonation or sucked up into the fireball, the more radio-isotopes are activated. Blow them up high in the air, and there's _little_ fallout; blow them up on the ground, or _in_ the ground, and they make thousands or millions of tonnes of the stuff.
@@akizeta Neutron-induced radiation (fallout) is a relatively short-lived phenomenon. The isotopes are highly unstable and degrade quickly. It varies on the type of substrate that is irradiated but generally follows the 7/10 rule (after seven time periods, dose rate decrease by 10 times). Of course, mathematically it is asymptotic so it will never be zero, but it will be biologically insignificant in days to weeks. If there is radiation still left at the site, it is probably caused by incomplete fission remnants, not neutron-induced radiation.
RIP to the guys who drank that water and swam in that lake.... Reminds me of the time my friends bet me $20 to swim across a 30ft long, abandoned, stagnant sewage pond.
Sorry to burst your bubble but drinking that water is not going to kill you, nor swimming in it. People have a hugely overinflated understanding of the danger of radiation. You can pretty safely even walk around Chernobyl today despite it releasing much more radiation than this thermonuclear blast did. The most danger from radioactivity is when particles are inhaled and they get permanently embedded in the lungs. The long term exposure is the dangerous thing.
"OK, here's my idea. We use a thermonuclear device to blow a big crater in the middle of a river, and this will form a lake which, in just 10,000 years, will be able to be used for recreational and commercial purposes." "Da, let's do it!"
How many scientists ALWAYS say something new isn't going to work... They thought a nuke would destroy the entire world, they thought it was impossible to survive in space, they thought germs weren't real, etc. If people never did things that someone else said wouldn't work, we'd still be living in caves and using rocks for tools
@keith moore According to Professor Chris Buzby and the celebrated Italian Physicist Emilio Del Giudice 9/11 was a 4th Generation Nuclear Event. The weapon used Uranium charged "soaked" with Deuterium to a point just below the critical threshold then pressure was imposed upon it to trigger nuclear FUSION. Its uses the principles of Pressure Fusion first discovered by Percy Williams Bridgman who received the 1946 Nobel Prize in Physics for his work on the effects of extreme pressure on materials. Dust samples USGS - United States Geological Survey (Department of the Interior) Barium = 765-3670ppm Strontium = 1000-3130ppm Uranium = 3.92-7.57 Thorium = 30.7 Barium & Strontium are not trace, but highly dangerous amounts. The steel beam coatings contain up to 93Bq/Kg Uranium - Professor Chris Buzby Tritium at 55x normal in the water run off - Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Elevated levels of Uranium in the air 4,000ng/g (EHP) & correlated by Dr Cahill (UCLA Davis) Iodine 131 which has a very short half-life of only 8 days was also discovered - Oktay and Partners
@@Kpopzoom Busby is a health scientist, an expert on what ionizing radiation does to to your insides. His conclusions are controversial and he is abusive to people who disagree with him. Del Giudice was a theoretical physicist known mostly for his work on string theory. Bridgman did indeed win the 1946 Nobel Prize in Physics but his work had nothing to do with fission or fusion. He was trying to create diamonds, mostly. None of them worked on weapon design. 4G nuclear weapons are fusion only. They don't use uranium and are only theoretical at this stage. 3G thermonuclear weapons use a fission reaction to produce the heat and pressure necessary to ignite a fusion reaction. A thermonuclear weapon would not leave residue at it's detonation point. Any uranium not fissioned would be vaporized and would be contained within the fireball which creates the mushroom cloud. It would later condense and fall-out somewhere else. I suggest you work on your grammar first then work on fission/fusion physics and weapon design.
@@captainscarlett1You think its "theoretical" because of what - they didn't tell you about it? Did you expect they would publicize their use of stealth weapons on CNN or something?? I suggest you upgrade your firmware from 1960's 3rd generation era nukes to the present day. 4th generation Fusion nukes have been proven to exist and are covered in Emillio Del Giudice's book and by others. And, if you are more knowledgeable than a Celebrated Nuclear Physicist then please post the link to your Wikipedia page entry and let us know where you got your Phd ? I'll wait shall I...
I know you meant that the attempts to harness nuclear explosives for peaceful purposes were failures, but for the benefit of anyone less familiar with the peaceful uses of nuclear power, I just wanted to make the following points briefly: A growing consensus among the overlapping scientific and environmentalist communities is that nuclear power is sorely needed in any comprehensive plan to slow and eventually halt manmade climate change. Tiny amounts of plutonium created in nuclear reactors power the deep space missions that have expanded our understanding of our place in the universe and shown us, by way of comparison with the beautiful but unremittingly hostile other worlds of our Solar System, how unique and precious our home the Earth truly is. The field of radiomedicine, often performed with isotopes of technetium or with gold molecules irradiated in small reactors like the one operated by students at MIT, has vastly enriched our diagnostic and treatment options for some of the most dreaded illnesses known to medicine, saving many lives. Like the rockets that may ultimately make it possible for humans to preserve the seed of life and plant it in new gardens, nuclear power has sinister applications. Something of a test for us to pass before we can emerge from this world as better versions of ourselves. But ultimately, the universe runs on nuclear power. Both are capable of creating, or facilitating the creation of, beautiful things as well as mind-bending horrors.
If made to choose between Morgan Freeman or “Dark Narrator” to narrate my life I’m taking “Dark Narrator” hands down! The guys tone, his speed, etc. is top notch! I’ll call him “Dark Narrator” since we have never seen nor heard a name but a name nor a picture is needed when you’re as awesome of a narrator as he is! I’m not even gonna start to say how much I love the “family” of Dark Channels bc that’ll go on forever but suffice to say I’ve been subscribed to “Dark5” for so long that I was around when there was zero narration & you just read the info but even then the content was as great as it is now! So naturally when he expanded the Dark channels I immediately subscribe regardless of name or content choice bc I know whatever it is it’ll be literally the tippy top cream of the crop! I’ve never seen a bad video on any of these channels!
Omg are you talking about morgan freeman from that old tv show called XGames where they played games and expressed the pro's and con's of anygame? Or wait nvm just realised her name is morgan web..and also just realised morgan freeman is the black sexy voice guy 🤦
@@filonin2 the sixties is exactly were promiscuity and slacker mentality was normalized. Remember why it was called "sexual" revolution. Also MOST of your "Rights" had already been solidified into the constitutions of most nations by the start of the 20th century.
@@h.cedric8157 The 1960's is the "back then" we are talking about so you are undermining the OP's point about society being tougher back then, not mine. The sexual revolution is when women gained their sexual independence, which was a right. You incels sure are a sad pathetic bunch. Can't even get laid when women can choose.
I had trouble locating the image of the lake and person on the thumb nail so thanks for the giant red arrow and circle, otherwise I wouldn’t have been able to find the lake and person.
What about the radioactive water leaching into the aquifer and polluting the surrounding area for hundreds if not thousands of miles in every direction.
As good as that may sound, if he did start narratingfulk length documentaties, he would immediately be in such high demand he would no longer have the time for doing these short films. He would be asked to voiceover everything from food ads to medication. I would really like to hear him narrate for the A.H.C. channel from Discovery, doing the WWll themed documentaries.
@@hamletksquid2702 Just a shovel takes ages, an excavator will get the job done faster, but there is no way to build a 100km tunnel in a couple of days.
@@madmax2069 no i think that at the time period this was done the only people who had a clue at all to what the aftermath would be is the physicist who designed and constructed the weapons the people that had the authority to use them probably didnt have much more than a rudimentary understanding of physics and thought of it as a really powerful conventional bomb possibly with a few new after affects it would be like giving a super car to a teenager on the day they got their license when they learned to drive with a prius and then expect them to not only be able to handle the power but to also use it wisely looking back in this manor it seems like humanity got really lucky that by the time other countries had gotten atomic weapons the affects of using them were becoming more commonly know and the consequences of using them became one of the main reasons not to use them
The coolest and most useful implication the Russians had for nukes was capping aflame oil wells. If we (USA) did that to the BP gulf spill it would have been over in about a month. The russians also have that crazy MIG jet powered water cannon mated to a T34 tank
Yeah! You just need one (or two) small devices with very powerful gamma radiation to melt the steel structures without causing a real blast, a few airplanes for diversion, and you get the perfect excuse to invade a couple of oil-rich countries! :D
So was the US... you just don't hear about it as often. Also worth mentioning that USA actually detonated not one, but TWO devices on civilian-populated cities. Talk about atrocity...
@@ananthropomorphictalkinggo6641 You just don't know it when you do it, buddy. The amount of nuclear tests and incidents in USA during the Cold War is amazing. Even more amazing how they always managed to cover it up! On a side note: USA did most of the testing abroad, blowing up other people's lands, as is the custom for Americans.
Typical anti-american lies. Worry about your own country, where covid has a 10% mortality rate because of how awful your country's health is. As for these imaginary nuclear disasters, you really need to stop getting your news from Russian propaganda. There are no nuclear disasters in the US, because we didn't cut corners like the Russians did. Plain and simple.
Lets not forget, that back in this period there were nuclear tests everywhere. Nevada desert and pacific islands were blown up by the US, french also tested on their pacific territories. Soviets used Kazahstan (and other places) for their space program and nuclear testing
I never would have found the human or the lake in the thumbnail without the big red arrow and circle, thank you, lol. Interesting video, I wish they could have just asked us instead of running all those tests. Soviet people didn't need that, it makes me so upset!
I'm amazed that no one seemed to foresee this radiation problem before even the first bomb was detonated far less 156 of them! It seems inconceivable that people can be smart enough to build such a weapon but then be too dumb to realise what the effect would be.
So they knew these bombs gave off massive amounts of radiation but still thought it would be a great idea to make these huge craters so they could fill them with water to use for crops and human consumption. What could possibly go wrong with that idea. 😂
Lake created in 1965. 55 years later the area is still too radioactive to be used. Makes me think they were testing something else in that bomb to see how dirty they could make an area and how long it would naturally last.
Many like to dismiss Russia as unintelligent. At 150+ "peaceful tests" it is reasonable to believe they were exploring more than nuclear excavation techniques. The isotopes half life was pretty well understood by then. The effects were pretty well known as well. At the same time Russia has little trust in data sourced outside its borders...They are good intelligent people with a really bad government.
But what happened to the horses that drank the water and the person that jumped into the lake and drank the water?? Huge disconnect to the content flow because the next scene is about visitor having the wear protective gear to visit the lake.
On the 3rd day of Christmas, the atomic crater filled with 3 million cubic meters of water.....On the 6th day of Christmas the atomic crater filled with 6 million cubic meters of water....On the 12th day of Christmas Santa took to snorkeling on the atomic lake and never delivered gifts anymore!
"Hey hows it going?" "Great and good morning, today we make nuclear lake " "Awesome! can I watch" ? in russian: "Эй, как дела?" «Прекрасное и доброе утро, сегодня мы делаем ядерное озеро» «Круто! Можно посмотреть»?
USA experimented in similar ways for a long time. They knew about it, they just didn't care. There are still plenty of guys tuning their Duramax diesels until they vomit sooth all over the place! People are dumb and careless, everywhere in the world.
It would need an insane amount of explosives to replicate that. The Tsar Bomba (not the one used in this test) is a 100 megaton bomb, that means you need 100 million tons of TNT to get a similar explosion. That's 100,000,000,000 kg of TNT, just to put it in perspective.
@@FedericoLucchi I know what it is, but we have a lot of conventional explosives that are going to sit unused. These were what, 4 kiloton bombs for a lake? 400,000kg of tnt if I'm no mistaken? It is doable.
![เปิดใจ “ต้นหอม ศกุนตลา” หลังโดนพาดพิงธุรกิจที่เคยทำ และผลกระทบทำถูกปลดฟ้าผ่า! | แฉ 24 ต.ค.67 [2/3]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vCi5OIqlxaE/mqdefault.jpg)
Points of interest:
France - Eiffel tower
Italy - Colosseum
Kazahstan - Abandoned nuclear test sites
good thing France dumps their radioactive waste in the ocean
@@MrTaxiRob you are fake news
I'm pretty convinced that the "duck" is just a guy swimming lol
In soviet russia, duck creates wake!
@@RayKinard in mother russia duck no create wake. Wake create duck
That is a poor, "misinformed" human-being....
*(Where'd the narrator get "duck"....?)
I’m pretty convinced you’re correct sir...😆
Correct
Artificial lakes from thermonuclear detonations, yeah sounds about right...
Who could've forseen the outcome huh.
Gee what could go wrong
If you like 3 eyed fish
YEAH! RIGHT OUTTA A HORRIFIC SCI FI MOVIE. THE WORST THING ABOUT THIS IS ITS REAL LIVE ! IDIOT'S ! INTELLECTUAL ONES AT THAT ! THAT GO TOO FUCKIN FAR ... .....
The word Thermonuclear always makes me thing of the movie War Games( the 1st one not the remake bs). Would you like to play a game?
"It was quickly abandoned when _holy fuck this thing glows like a lite-brite_ !"
No electricity needed.... forever
'Grim ambiance'.
First thing that came to mind was Detroit.
Word
Plenty of other Cities in the good ole USA that match Detroit.
@@ryanspalding875 sure, anywhere that a "projects" but Russia was considerably worse.
@keith moore You know what amazes me the most? People keep whining about Dem run cities. Yet, refuse to get off their lazy fat arses and go and vote.
That is all you people have to do, is get out and vote. And do not carry on about a stolen election and all that crap. because that is all there is, crap. No evidence, and a Million Dollars waiting to be collected if that person can provide evidence. Funny that, no one has come forward to provided evidence and collect.
So, get of your bum, and get all your other peoples bums off the seats and go and Vote GOP, and then see what they can do. EASY!!!
@keith moore That is right, all they care about is their seats in Govt where they get rich. In Australia, it is compulsory to vote, so we get a 96% turnout, so they have to appeal to most people to win their seat in Govt. Too few Americans vote, a record 66% voted in 2020, what happened to the other 34%? As Ben Franklin said, "I have given you a Republic, it is up to you to keep it.". You get the Govt you deserve. Remember that. Cheers
USSR: "I've made a huge mistake."
USSR: "Ive made a huge success!"
On a really long list of many. But this one truly takes the cake, and nukes it.......
Da.
Erm, "Duh."
Seems like they wouldve know the radiation would be a problem.
Yeah, W T F ?????? Although thinking about it further it was probably a facade for a test during a ban.
In the eyes of your government, everything harmful to us “isn’t a problem”
@Robert Sears "Clean" nukes are a myth. The high-energy ionizing radiation from the nuclear detonation and fireball activates ordinary elements in the soil, making them radioactive. The more matter you have next to the detonation or sucked up into the fireball, the more radio-isotopes are activated. Blow them up high in the air, and there's _little_ fallout; blow them up on the ground, or _in_ the ground, and they make thousands or millions of tonnes of the stuff.
@@akizeta Neutron-induced radiation (fallout) is a relatively short-lived phenomenon. The isotopes are highly unstable and degrade quickly. It varies on the type of substrate that is irradiated but generally follows the 7/10 rule (after seven time periods, dose rate decrease by 10 times). Of course, mathematically it is asymptotic so it will never be zero, but it will be biologically insignificant in days to weeks. If there is radiation still left at the site, it is probably caused by incomplete fission remnants, not neutron-induced radiation.
This is easy to say in hindsight but at the time the exact effects were unknown, this is how we found out what we now know
Soviets just love to use nukes on every problem lmao
Project Plowshare was the original!
@Jack King we talking bout Russia rn
You should see The Soviet fly swatters
@@bobthebuilder1360 Russia has never used a nuke to end a war ... yet!
Remember when Trump wanted to nuke hurricanes?
🤣🤣🤣
Good times, good times.
you need to narrate feature length documantaries my man.. top work as always
Yeah I like him, but I miss when Dark5 made us read the creepy shit...
I agree. Specifically, they should do a feature on the Korean War..
The next David Attenborough
@@PaladinOfNerds I dont think that would work for a long documentary
Nah. He needs to talk more slowly like he did in his older videos. He made way fewer errors and pronunciation mistakes back then.
RIP to the guys who drank that water and swam in that lake....
Reminds me of the time my friends bet me $20 to swim across a 30ft long, abandoned, stagnant sewage pond.
Did... did you do it?
@@baker099 Bro, it's $20. Of course I did it.
Sorry to burst your bubble but drinking that water is not going to kill you, nor swimming in it. People have a hugely overinflated understanding of the danger of radiation. You can pretty safely even walk around Chernobyl today despite it releasing much more radiation than this thermonuclear blast did. The most danger from radioactivity is when particles are inhaled and they get permanently embedded in the lungs. The long term exposure is the dangerous thing.
@@marttiinnanen4911 and you do what for a living ? ?
@@heyrod59 I'm an IT specialist. What does it have to do with this discussion?
"OK, here's my idea. We use a thermonuclear device to blow a big crater in the middle of a river, and this will form a lake which, in just 10,000 years, will be able to be used for recreational and commercial purposes."
"Da, let's do it!"
4:13 the duck looks suspiciously like a person with fins and a snorkel. Damn soviets.
Russians, nuking backyard to make a pool or smthn
he talks at 1.25 speed
I set all his videos to 0.75 cuz it's too fast
@@Commandoman97 same
@@Commandoman97 i still set it at 1.25x
Guys watch at 0.25
I wonder how many scientists told them that wasn’t going to work before they started.
One-and after he was shot, the rest said it was a great idea!
How many scientists ALWAYS say something new isn't going to work...
They thought a nuke would destroy the entire world, they thought it was impossible to survive in space, they thought germs weren't real, etc.
If people never did things that someone else said wouldn't work, we'd still be living in caves and using rocks for tools
@Robert Sears It absolutely would not work today. I don't even know where you get that idea from. "less radiation" does not equal "no radiation".
@Robert Sears "cleaner" does not mean "no radiation".
Wonder how many knew the effects but still wanted to collect data that they knew couldn't be collected in any other country.
Great video. Also by far my favorite narrator of the couple you use. The voice is just so good and really connects and immerses me in the videos.
Making lakes with thermonuclear bombs. What could possibly go wrong,?
Absolutely; I'd use a bomb for my swimming pool only it'd take out every living organism for 100,000 years.
“Friendly Nuclear Explosion” is an oxymoron...
But its friendly
4th Gen Fusion is fairly clean - worked out about OK for the Twin Towers.
@keith moore According to Professor Chris Buzby and the celebrated Italian Physicist Emilio Del Giudice 9/11 was a 4th Generation Nuclear Event.
The weapon used Uranium charged "soaked" with Deuterium to a point just below the critical threshold then pressure was imposed upon it to trigger nuclear FUSION. Its uses the principles of Pressure Fusion first discovered by Percy Williams Bridgman who received the 1946 Nobel Prize in Physics for his work on the effects of extreme pressure on materials.
Dust samples USGS - United States Geological Survey (Department of the Interior)
Barium = 765-3670ppm
Strontium = 1000-3130ppm
Uranium = 3.92-7.57
Thorium = 30.7
Barium & Strontium are not trace, but highly dangerous amounts.
The steel beam coatings contain up to 93Bq/Kg Uranium - Professor Chris Buzby
Tritium at 55x normal in the water run off - Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Elevated levels of Uranium in the air 4,000ng/g (EHP) & correlated by Dr Cahill (UCLA Davis)
Iodine 131 which has a very short half-life of only 8 days was also discovered - Oktay and Partners
@@Kpopzoom Busby is a health scientist, an expert on what ionizing radiation does to to your insides. His conclusions are controversial and he is abusive to people who disagree with him. Del Giudice was a theoretical physicist known mostly for his work on string theory. Bridgman did indeed win the 1946 Nobel Prize in Physics but his work had nothing to do with fission or fusion. He was trying to create diamonds, mostly. None of them worked on weapon design. 4G nuclear weapons are fusion only. They don't use uranium and are only theoretical at this stage. 3G thermonuclear weapons use a fission reaction to produce the heat and pressure necessary to ignite a fusion reaction. A thermonuclear weapon would not leave residue at it's detonation point. Any uranium not fissioned would be vaporized and would be contained within the fireball which creates the mushroom cloud. It would later condense and fall-out somewhere else. I suggest you work on your grammar first then work on fission/fusion physics and weapon design.
@@captainscarlett1You think its "theoretical" because of what - they didn't tell you about it?
Did you expect they would publicize their use of stealth weapons on CNN or something??
I suggest you upgrade your firmware from 1960's 3rd generation era nukes to the present day. 4th generation Fusion nukes have been proven to exist and are covered in Emillio Del Giudice's book and by others.
And, if you are more knowledgeable than a Celebrated Nuclear Physicist then please post the link to your Wikipedia page entry and let us know where you got your Phd ?
I'll wait shall I...
the red circle around the guy was a hilarious touch for the thumbnail
And we wonder why cancer is so prominent
It took 27 tests for US scientist to figure out that this was a bad idea. Geniuses. Super geniuses.
Exactly. Just more “experts”. We need to stop listening to these government “experts” on everything.
@keith moore I'll bet that's the truth. 😂🤣😅
im so glad the arrow and circle were there, i couldnt see the person standing and the lake in the background
I know you meant that the attempts to harness nuclear explosives for peaceful purposes were failures, but for the benefit of anyone less familiar with the peaceful uses of nuclear power, I just wanted to make the following points briefly:
A growing consensus among the overlapping scientific and environmentalist communities is that nuclear power is sorely needed in any comprehensive plan to slow and eventually halt manmade climate change.
Tiny amounts of plutonium created in nuclear reactors power the deep space missions that have expanded our understanding of our place in the universe and shown us, by way of comparison with the beautiful but unremittingly hostile other worlds of our Solar System, how unique and precious our home the Earth truly is.
The field of radiomedicine, often performed with isotopes of technetium or with gold molecules irradiated in small reactors like the one operated by students at MIT, has vastly enriched our diagnostic and treatment options for some of the most dreaded illnesses known to medicine, saving many lives.
Like the rockets that may ultimately make it possible for humans to preserve the seed of life and plant it in new gardens, nuclear power has sinister applications. Something of a test for us to pass before we can emerge from this world as better versions of ourselves. But ultimately, the universe runs on nuclear power. Both are capable of creating, or facilitating the creation of, beautiful things as well as mind-bending horrors.
"It was here, by the shores of this peaceful lake, where Borat was born..."
If made to choose between Morgan Freeman or “Dark Narrator” to narrate my life I’m taking “Dark Narrator” hands down! The guys tone, his speed, etc. is top notch! I’ll call him “Dark Narrator” since we have never seen nor heard a name but a name nor a picture is needed when you’re as awesome of a narrator as he is! I’m not even gonna start to say how much I love the “family” of Dark Channels bc that’ll go on forever but suffice to say I’ve been subscribed to “Dark5” for so long that I was around when there was zero narration & you just read the info but even then the content was as great as it is now! So naturally when he expanded the Dark channels I immediately subscribe regardless of name or content choice bc I know whatever it is it’ll be literally the tippy top cream of the crop! I’ve never seen a bad video on any of these channels!
Omg are you talking about morgan freeman from that old tv show called XGames where they played games and expressed the pro's and con's of anygame? Or wait nvm just realised her name is morgan web..and also just realised morgan freeman is the black sexy voice guy 🤦
Love al your channels! For years now
I feel like society is so soft compared to society back then. Nowadays people would be protesting and crying about someone else's opinion.
The 1960's were nothing but an entire decade of protests. It's how people got rights. Learn your history ffs.
@@filonin2 the sixties is exactly were promiscuity and slacker mentality was normalized. Remember why it was called "sexual" revolution.
Also MOST of your "Rights" had already been solidified into the constitutions of most nations by the start of the 20th century.
@@h.cedric8157 The 1960's is the "back then" we are talking about so you are undermining the OP's point about society being tougher back then, not mine. The sexual revolution is when women gained their sexual independence, which was a right. You incels sure are a sad pathetic bunch. Can't even get laid when women can choose.
I had trouble locating the image of the lake and person on the thumb nail so thanks for the giant red arrow and circle, otherwise I wouldn’t have been able to find the lake and person.
Ducks don't have Geiger counters.
Not yet at least. Keep exposing them to fallout and who knows what could happen!
No, they have Aflac
LOL can’t they rap themselfs in duck tape and armor?
“Due to environmental concerns...”
Dark viewers go brrrrrr
What about the radioactive water leaching into the aquifer and polluting the surrounding area for hundreds if not thousands of miles in every direction.
You should narrate documentarys on history channel. Good work as always.
As good as that may sound, if he did start narratingfulk length documentaties, he would immediately be in such high demand he would no longer have the time for doing these short films. He would be asked to voiceover everything from food ads to medication. I would really like to hear him narrate for the A.H.C. channel from Discovery, doing the WWll themed documentaries.
I like this channel very much
Duck Duck Goose had a totally different meaning in the USSR.
Kazakhstan: "Very Nice!"
very entertaining indeed, been watching for a while. keep it up :)))
Too bad we dont have anything like a clean geoengineering tool to create lakes, tunnels, valleys,...
We do. It's called a shovel. Expensive method, though.
@@hamletksquid2702 Just a shovel takes ages, an excavator will get the job done faster, but there is no way to build a 100km tunnel in a couple of days.
sounds like the people who came up with this idea had no clue what the aftermath of detonating an atomic weapon entails
or they did, and played if off
@@madmax2069 no i think that at the time period this was done the only people who had a clue at all to what the aftermath would be is the physicist who designed and constructed the weapons the people that had the authority to use them probably didnt have much more than a rudimentary understanding of physics and thought of it as a really powerful conventional bomb possibly with a few new after affects it would be like giving a super car to a teenager on the day they got their license when they learned to drive with a prius and then expect them to not only be able to handle the power but to also use it wisely looking back in this manor it seems like humanity got really lucky that by the time other countries had gotten atomic weapons the affects of using them were becoming more commonly know and the consequences of using them became one of the main reasons not to use them
WOW! @2:06 look at how close people are standing next to a underground nuclear explosion.
Why didn’t you say anything about him dying a year later from radiation poisoning after swimming in the lake?
Is that true that he died from swimming in the lake?
Because it apparently didn't happen
The Minister of the Ministry of Medium Machine Building at the time was Efim Slavsky, and he died in 1991
The coolest and most useful implication the Russians had for nukes was capping aflame oil wells. If we (USA) did that to the BP gulf spill it would have been over in about a month. The russians also have that crazy MIG jet powered water cannon mated to a T34 tank
Dude, every video you narrate, I have to slow it down
Same. It's really irritating.
Now you know radiation is everywhere
@03:06 Great footage!! 💥
I bet they could bring down sky scraper buildings with explosions like that in the basements.
Yeah! You just need one (or two) small devices with very powerful gamma radiation to melt the steel structures without causing a real blast, a few airplanes for diversion, and you get the perfect excuse to invade a couple of oil-rich countries! :D
@@FedericoLucchi I bet with enough underground testing you would know just the right yeald for the bombs.
@@FedericoLucchi but that would also melt cars between the street and the melting device
How could someone think that this is a good idea? They know about fallout and radiation? They had to know this would just create atomic crater's!
My god, the soviets with their nukes were kids with cherry bombs, just blowing up random things for fun.
The Amerikans started it several years before.
@@ellayararwhyaych4711 nobody is swimming in atomic lakes over here buddy.
So was the US... you just don't hear about it as often. Also worth mentioning that USA actually detonated not one, but TWO devices on civilian-populated cities. Talk about atrocity...
@@ananthropomorphictalkinggo6641 You just don't know it when you do it, buddy. The amount of nuclear tests and incidents in USA during the Cold War is amazing. Even more amazing how they always managed to cover it up!
On a side note: USA did most of the testing abroad, blowing up other people's lands, as is the custom for Americans.
Typical anti-american lies. Worry about your own country, where covid has a 10% mortality rate because of how awful your country's health is. As for these imaginary nuclear disasters, you really need to stop getting your news from Russian propaganda. There are no nuclear disasters in the US, because we didn't cut corners like the Russians did. Plain and simple.
This video deserves more views
Yea because with something so destructive and truly terrifying always brings peace
Great dark work upload documentary and video thank you again whats the backing music please brilliant narrator
Looked good on paper.
GREAT DOC!!!!
Lets not forget, that back in this period there were nuclear tests everywhere. Nevada desert and pacific islands were blown up by the US, french also tested on their pacific territories.
Soviets used Kazahstan (and other places) for their space program and nuclear testing
Environmental concerns. Is this before or after the upper atmospheric detonations?
Good video as always.
I never would have found the human or the lake in the thumbnail without the big red arrow and circle, thank you, lol.
Interesting video, I wish they could have just asked us instead of running all those tests. Soviet people didn't need that, it makes me so upset!
I'm amazed that no one seemed to foresee this radiation problem before even the first bomb was detonated far less 156 of them! It seems inconceivable that people can be smart enough to build such a weapon but then be too dumb to realise what the effect would be.
So...they didn't know about the radiation I guess.
No fish, humans, live nearby. Sounds peaceful.
So they knew these bombs gave off massive amounts of radiation but still thought it would be a great idea to make these huge craters so they could fill them with water to use for crops and human consumption. What could possibly go wrong with that idea. 😂
Lake created in 1965. 55 years later the area is still too radioactive to be used. Makes me think they were testing something else in that bomb to see how dirty they could make an area and how long it would naturally last.
Many like to dismiss Russia as unintelligent. At 150+ "peaceful tests" it is reasonable to believe they were exploring more than nuclear excavation techniques. The isotopes half life was pretty well understood by then. The effects were pretty well known as well. At the same time Russia has little trust in data sourced outside its borders...They are good intelligent people with a really bad government.
That “duck” is a man swimming wearing a snorkel
USA: Stop nuking your rivers!
Also USA: Let's nuke the Van Allen belt.
At first we are told that no-one lives in the area of the artificial crater lake, then we are shown abandoned apartment buildings.
“Nuclear explosions for the national economy program “?😀
Very nice!
How many tests did it take for either side to reach the same conclusion? Un-freakin-believable.
Sounds like a tourism promotional video for lake Chagan.
Those building look like the buildings in call of duty morden warfare all gullied up
So what happened to the guy who drank the water and swam in it?!
So, not actually blowing up an atomic lake, but setting off an atomic bomb to create a lake that later got called Atomic Lake.
Friendly and nuclear explosion don't exactly go well together in the same sentence
that was clearly a person swimming not a duck lmfao
Alternate title: ALTERNATE Russian Vodka Lake (This Video Has 100 Times The Normal Amount of Radioactive Nucleotides)
Interesting video. The USSR fell apart in 1991 not 1989.
hey @Dark Footage i quite enjoy the background music in this one, i got lost!
When people are so intelligent that they're actually dumb.
And we are supposed to believe either side was doing anything but skirting test ban treaties.
But what happened to the horses that drank the water and the person that jumped into the lake and drank the water?? Huge disconnect to the content flow because the next scene is about visitor having the wear protective gear to visit the lake.
I did not think water could be radio active, isn’t it an insulator to radiation? The rocks and earth surfaces certainly can be radioactive.
On the 3rd day of Christmas, the atomic crater filled with 3 million cubic meters of water.....On the 6th day of Christmas the atomic crater filled with 6 million cubic meters of water....On the 12th day of Christmas Santa took to snorkeling on the atomic lake and never delivered gifts anymore!
"Hey hows it going?"
"Great and good morning, today we make nuclear lake "
"Awesome! can I watch" ?
in russian:
"Эй, как дела?"
«Прекрасное и доброе утро, сегодня мы делаем ядерное озеро»
«Круто! Можно посмотреть»?
The duck is clearly a man with a snorkel lol
No views or comments dang
Combining water with radiation. Bruh
How did they not know radiation might be a side-effect of nuking to create your water reservoir?!!
🙄
Bald and Bankrupt hasn't been there yet. I hope he tours the area, it's pretty Soviet era.
You kinda wonder if that guy that went swimming in this lake lived to a ripe old age........
Do some research ,he’s dead
aight im subbing
IVAN says, lake stay warm even im vinter time.
It is very likely the lake is very clear today.
Dark "nonetheless" footage
LOL, scientists?! Didn't think using a nuclear bomb, would produce NUCLEAR FALLOUT? 🤦♂️
USA experimented in similar ways for a long time. They knew about it, they just didn't care. There are still plenty of guys tuning their Duramax diesels until they vomit sooth all over the place! People are dumb and careless, everywhere in the world.
Info is fine what's with the thumbnail?
Nice.
How long did the guy live that drank the water?
The man who drunk the water & jumped in to swim, what was his name or medical condition after
I wonder what would happen if you detonated a tsar bomb sized thermonuclear bomb underground
Hey dude we are glowing sweet..
Now it needs to be retried, but with conventional explosives! Maybe air drop some MOP and use their craters? Idk
It would need an insane amount of explosives to replicate that. The Tsar Bomba (not the one used in this test) is a 100 megaton bomb, that means you need 100 million tons of TNT to get a similar explosion. That's 100,000,000,000 kg of TNT, just to put it in perspective.
@@FedericoLucchi I know what it is, but we have a lot of conventional explosives that are going to sit unused. These were what, 4 kiloton bombs for a lake? 400,000kg of tnt if I'm no mistaken? It is doable.