Trump's victory: What does it mean? - A communist analysis with Alan Woods

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 32

  • @BrongCommunist
    @BrongCommunist 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +6

    ✊ excellent analysis by Alan as usual

  • @Keasarr
    @Keasarr 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +7

    Very good analysis, comrades. While conservatives dance in joy thinking they are gonna finally fix things (by repeating insanely the same ”solutions” again) and liberals bury their heads in their hands wondering what went wrong, we communists look and understand that this was no great surprise. We remember history and see where things lead and understand why.

  • @wolfcookerBack
    @wolfcookerBack 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This interview is great. 🚩✊️

  • @ScytheOfBelial
    @ScytheOfBelial 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Another great video!

  • @MonicoMolinar
    @MonicoMolinar 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    Great analysis 👍

  • @ambrosemalone1891
    @ambrosemalone1891 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    Excelente! Serious analysis and perspectives. We are living in interesting times

  • @RaeKearns
    @RaeKearns 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Welsh Secret Service propaganda, hidden Welsh Imperialist ambitions…….

  • @tanujSE
    @tanujSE 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Books are as useful to a stupid person as a mirror is useful to a blind person.
    -Chanakya

  • @derantiobskurant
    @derantiobskurant 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    One thing is that the US, which, as the strategy paper “Overextending Russia” by the think tank RAND-Cooperation reveals, has won a small victory with the Ukraine war: They have become the worlds largest supplier of energy, which has allowed them to postpone the crisis a little. However, as we can see today, this was nothing more than a Pyrrhic victory. Becoming the largest energy supplier can only expand US capitalism a little, make it more flexible, postpone the crisis, but not resolve the real contradictions. The contradictions will only intensify after Russia's victory. We know this and are patiently doing our job. Bolshevism has more Standfestigkeit.

  • @FakeNewsHunter
    @FakeNewsHunter 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Oh please come to the point! 7th minute and still no answer to What does it mean?

  • @lochnessmunster1189
    @lochnessmunster1189 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    Not a fan of Trump myself, but I think the Workers who live and vote in the US were sick of continuously having to have their wages reduced to pay for endless people arriving, getting free money.

    • @B_Estes_Undegöetz
      @B_Estes_Undegöetz 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +7

      Dude! That’s not the interpretation Marxists choose. Pushing that on a Marxist channel is cringe false consciousness. Go back and read a book. Might I suggest … Lenin’s “Imperialism, The Highest Form of Capitalism” and R. Palme Dutt, “Fascism and Social Revolution”

    • @lochnessmunster1189
      @lochnessmunster1189 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@B_Estes_Undegöetz I have read a book- many in fact, and I used to be a Marxist. But let me ask you: should the taxpayers of the US be forced to pay for endless people who arrive illegally?

    • @ecvande2859
      @ecvande2859 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You’ve been brainwashed by neoliberal propaganda. Identity politics is what the bourgeoisie uses to split the working class along different lines. Actually smooth brain takes in this comment section..

    • @Deebz270
      @Deebz270 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@lochnessmunster1189 That is a straw-man argument. Especially for one who purports to be an 'ex-Marxist'. You are using ''illegal'' immigration as the primary reasoning the moron won the US election - essentially on the racism ticket.
      The ONLY reason Trump won this election was down to a third runner - Jill Stein - who seriously should have been the 47th POTUS - who garnered some serious portion of votes away from both the Reps and the Dems....
      It is exactly the same paradigm here in the UK and over most of Europe.
      True INTERNATIONAL COMMUNISM, like the living (and now dying) biosphere itself does not recognise national 'sovereignties', or exclusive ethnicity even.
      The current bi-party state apparatus is archaic and outmoded. Ill-equipped to address the needs of an ever-expanding global population, on a planet with with ever-dwindling resources and at a time where biospheric dynamics are in flux....
      What you should be asking is - should the American taxpayer (or the UK or average EU taxpayer) be forced to pay for on over-bloated military and to fund pointless conflicts - all in aid of personal profit? The abolition of the US nuclear arms alone would improve the living standards of ALL Americans and make the world SAFER..... Surely....?

    • @BrongCommunist
      @BrongCommunist 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@lochnessmunster1189 the question is not about those who enters the country "illegally". That has occurred because US capitalists are looking for cheap labor. They become an easy scape goat because the rightwing can say "look, immigrants are coming and taking your jobs at a lower wage." But who is paying them? Who destroyed their countries with IMF loans and and tariffs? Overthrew their democratically elected officially to put in place puppet governments with pro-US business interests. The United States did that in-fact.
      The real problem is not immigrants, but the need to organize immigrants into the trade unions alongside American workers to fight the bosses together.

  • @tanujSE
    @tanujSE 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    It means nothing for you
    Although you can end up creating lots of books for it
    I don't know if books is the example of communist?