How this Talking Heads Rhythm Masterpiece Remains Unsolved in 2022

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ก.ย. 2024
  • Like 'Once in a Lifetime' from Talking Heads Remain in Light, 'Crosseyed and Painless' is a masterpiece of rhythm, guitar, and music. The band is still waiting to see if anyone can solve this rhythm riddle created by David Byrne and Brian Eno.
    Does the song start on the 1 beat and the 3 beat?
    Talking Heads are Tina Weymouth, David Byrne, Jerry Harrison, and Chris Frantz.
    Talking Heads song Crosseyed and Painless includes an unresolved rhythm on bass guitar. I also explore the meaning and musical structure of the 'crosseyed and painless' song.
    Please like and subscribe to support the channel!
    Comment your favorite thing about the Talking Heads!
    Check out the Crosseyed and Painless covers by Phish and Goose.
    Phish and Goose are excellent jam bands!
    Talking Heads are the most underrated band of all-time!
    #talkingheads #davidbyrne #musicmoments
    Links:
    David Byrne youtube : / @davidbyrneofficial
    Once in a Lifetime : • Talking Heads - Once i...
    David Byrne website : davidbyrne.com/
    Phish website : phish.com/
    Goose (band) website: www.goosetheba...
    Who is this video for?
    My music theory lesson appeals to any fans of the Talking Heads or David Byrne. You may enjoy the awesome video if you are a drummer and guitar player and taking drum lessons or guitar lessons. This video Talking Heads' "Once in a Lifetime," from the 1980 album Remain in Light. This exploration also interests people who want to know 'who are the talking heads' or 'what is the talking heads most famous song.' I love the band name but perhaps you want to know 'why are they called the talking heads'. Will the Talking Heads ever reunite. Can you make a Talking Heads cover?

ความคิดเห็น • 20

  • @CMI2017
    @CMI2017 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Listen to Fela Kuti's Afrodisiac. It was the album Eno played it to them and they basically poached the entire rhythmic arrangements for Remain in Light. Brilliant nonetheless.

  • @Baribrotzer
    @Baribrotzer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    A musician I met who'd played in an Afrobeat band told me that the Africans in the band thought of each part in the rhythmic pattern as having its own "1". Which might, or might not coincide with anyone else's "1". So in this case, the bass and drums' "1" could be seen as half-a-bar away from the guitar's "1", and both your descriptions are true at the same time.

    • @musicminute2004
      @musicminute2004 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That is mindblowing!

  • @SongthatJDlikes
    @SongthatJDlikes 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Talking heads are a good band, thanks Tom for showing us how they do it so good in the band

  • @KleversonRoyther
    @KleversonRoyther 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'm trying, but I just can't hear the bass as being on the 3. I shift my ears, but my brain snaps back to "bass on 1"right after. Great analysis as always, Tom!

  • @freddyfettuccine
    @freddyfettuccine ปีที่แล้ว

    I love this video thanks for this ❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @Andrew_M_Ward
    @Andrew_M_Ward 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Respectfully: Rhythmically ambiguous is a bit of s stretch. When unanalyzed and simply "felt" the song naturally settles in and clicks out like a funky 4/4 and eventually the rap section completely identifies the ONE in plain sight... No over-analysis required just let it happen.

  • @marxug1
    @marxug1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Does anybody know what guitar David Byrne is playing in this live performance?

    • @zachc.9565
      @zachc.9565 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Roland Guitar Synth
      GR-300

    • @marxug1
      @marxug1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@zachc.9565 Awesome, thanks. A sharp-looking instrument!

  • @ernie8419
    @ernie8419 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    the rap is stolen from tom tom club song wordy rappinghood.

  • @ephraimlessell
    @ephraimlessell 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What I'd like to see "solved" is why so many people think that their presumptuous, sterile, and academic analysis adds anything to music.

    • @ephraimlessell
      @ephraimlessell 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I suppose they offer analysis, because they don't have any original musical offerings.

    • @kevinshea3028
      @kevinshea3028 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      While academic type analysis lends nothing to the pure pleasure of music in general, the different world musical views, structure, innovation, creativity and formation gives many people an interesting and educational appreciation of the arts without all the tedious hard work that it actually requires. I see Eno, like I see Coltrane like I see Zappa because of different musical intricacies not seen everywhere.

    • @ephraimlessell
      @ephraimlessell 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tom_esquire Sorry Tom, not only was I in a bad mood when I wrote that, I have a psychiatric disorder that makes me fail to filter things. Write me if you want and I'll pull the remark. Honestly, I'm a bit jealous of people who can read and otherwise analyze musically technically. I write and play totally be ear essentially out of necessity. Again sorry.

    • @ephraimlessell
      @ephraimlessell 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kevinshea3028 I get your point. Please see my apology to original poster. I wish that I could understand music technically, though writing and performing music is my life and I think there is something to being "lost" as to technical stuff. That said, I could never play LIKE Zappa, Eno, or Coltrane. Hell, it takes me minutes to find a sample on a keyboard when all I have is the note and octave (i.e. G2). Best to you

    • @kevinshea3028
      @kevinshea3028 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ephraimlessell I am the same and there's nothing wrong with that. I think that some of the best material ever written is the simplest 12 bar blues. I'm a huge Stones fan and I'll listen to 4/4 time all day! I can count that high.😉 I just admire the person who can take it to another creative level saying "to hell with conventional". Now while to me that means Coltrane and Eno, it also means Sex Pistols! 😄 No apology needed. Albums like Remain in Light, Close to the Edge by Yes, Coltranes Love Supreme, all things Stravinsky, and so many others just astound me. I personally describe it as layering because what I hear are so many completely distinct and different rhythms, Chord and note progressions, percussions and sometimes just assorted sounds that despite being able to stand on their own and sometimes carrying completely different time signatures, rhythms and even volumes, still just meld seamlessly together to create something incredible. Have a good one! Sorry I'm so long winded when discussing music. 😄