@Sweet James Maybe in your part of the world its ok. But here in my place (South East Asia), we are already suffering from negative impacts. Billions of dollars lost during typhoons every year, food shortage, etc. Maybe its better if you get out of your high horse and see the world as a whole rather than your small safe space bubble. I'm also a farmer for 17 years (Pechay, Lettuce, Potatoes, Strawberries, and Roses). I have already adapted to Vertical farming. Gave me 5-8 times more output.
@@dallassegno When you trust no one and be cynical about everything, it doesn't make you a happier person. Isn't it an amazing thing that people still believe in good things instead of distrust each other?
@Sweet James Well, you may have your reasons. I understand how much the wolrd sucks, there are full of liars etc.. But to me I don't think buying wrong products can hurt me in any form, unless they are poisonous. Even if they are real liars, I've still got inspired. Maybe I'll try to be a better person myself, it doesn't hurt. The reason why the world sucks is because of everyone of us (not everyone but me). While I can't change others' way of life, I'm still gratful to see positive ideas that makes me want to change.
This was a heart warming video. It really shows how hard these farmers have to work for the future of mankind, for OUR future. It's truly inspirational.
It's noted that the farmers will feel the effects of climate change long before we do. However, WE consumers have the future of mankind. We have to redraw the food system, especially in the developed west, and the Standard American Diet that we have established as the marker for middle-class consumption. If the next Billion people born (and over 95% of them will be born in Africa and Asia) were to eat like Americans, our species is dead. We need to become more plant-based like the developing world, not the other way around!
I just came here because I would like to say that while they raised some important issues in this video, the solutions they portrayed are not at all solutions. I'm a student of Agroecology in university so I can say with some property that organic farming as it was portrayed here does not at all changes how we produce and distribute food, it's only difference from conventional agriculture is that it ceases to use chemicals. This is a problem, as is the very system of food production that it keeps that must be replaced in order for meaning change to happen. We need a much more deep and complex change. A system change. Organic farming is not that! It still has a high degree of machinery use (and so fossil fuel), water usage and outside input (for example the manure he talks about in the video, where is this coming from? Organic agriculture does not adress that) usage. It doesn't get better with hydroponics. So no, this is NOT the future of farming, because if it is, funnily, it will not be on longer future. As those two kinds of farming portrayed do not address the reasons why we are in the situation of climate change in the first place and so it cannot sustain life in the planet on a long-term. So we actually need a cultural and spiritual change, a fundamental change in the way humanity understands itself and see its place in this world and our interactions with it. To begin with, I recommend a read on Permaculture.
"...So we actually need a cultural and spiritual change, a fundamental change in the way humanity understands itself and see its place in this world and our interactions with it." very true.
David Lopez Aquaponics, smaller pollyculture operations and vertical farming will be needed to replace the soil people will use up for housing. They are on the right path but not off the path yet. I farm .78 urban acres and can produce almost 10,000 lbs of food every year. With their monoculture row techniques I would be lucky to produce 1000 lbs.
Nobody If you take into account the area of each row and number of levels, it's quite large how much food you can produce is such a small space of land by stacking on top of each other. For example, if you can grow an acre of land and produce 10,000 pounds of food every year why can't you take an acre of land, stack 30-40 levels with hundreds of rows and produce 40,000 - 60,000 pounds per year?
Notice that there aren't any animal pens in these operations. Can you imagine steers grazing on these plants? It illustrates the non-sustainability of meat production. Eat low on the food web.
Decomposing/oxidizing cow manure is probably the largest greenhouse gas contributor world wide... I live in a country that also uses it on every field but the best way to use it will be always mixed up in a ratio with other decomposing matter like 30% leafs,fruits,peals etc 30% cow manure 30% recycle paper,cardboard,wood chips, sticks etc in that way the soil will be way more balance in terms of holding moisture and nutrition. Also too much cow manure can essentially "burn" your crops.
very true, composting is the way to go for this. we need to produce less waste closing more and more the cycle of production until it becomes a natural system
It is also possible to get fuel from manure using anaerobic digesters. This traps the methane that would have been released so it can be used for fuel. The leftover is a good manure/compost substitute.
Let's not forget the C:N ratio should be 24:1 for soil microbes to compost efficiently. Cattle Manure is 17:1 so they could pea straw to help raise it.
+Wo Long most of the viewers are brainwashed by the MSM and the ones that lead and manage these huge websites. It's their fault for being gullible but it's also the fault of the people that own these websites for not stopping the brainwashing because of greed, imagine if all the environment around us would be designed to make us smarter, wiser, to increase our IQ, instead of doing the opposite, or at least not promoting stupidity and low IQ content.
A correction for 2:13 For these farmers all this effort is worth it, because for them the future of food has alot to do with the premium price of organic crops
I absolutely love that you made the soil a focus. Soil is so critically important. Concentional farming destroys millions of acres of heirable land every year.
the best solution its gmos in vertical farming because then we can let that land previously used to crops to grow forest less space, less price, less impact
I want a farm that no one can see because if the manure ever hits the fan, people will go to great lengths to eat. I’ve been really interested in what Kimbal musk is doing & other aquaponic farmers are doing. This family is so sweet & knows it is better to prepare than doing nothing at all, much respect & love to them.
05:13 "That's because the human race will consume more food in the next 50 years than it has in the past 10,000 years combined." This is admittedly terrifying, but it signifies what a unique point in history we occupy. We must understand all that history has taught us, but all the rules have changed. We are at the nexus of many powerful forces, including technology, overreliance on technology, a globalization via the Internet wherein the younger generation has more in common with people their age in faraway countries than they do with their parents; a globalization that makes corporations more powerful than countries. We have the ability to solve things that never before could be solved, and the ability to end our civilization with our sheer population of mindless consumer units voting for mindless populist governments. The human race hasn't faced extinction in a long time. Let's hope we find our survival instinct and awaken to our challenge.
Great video and good luck to these farmers, I hope big Agra doesn’t try to destroy their optimism and innovation. The future is about food more than the latest iPhones I think.
@@miriareu tech innovation is not all there is to innovation. Tech innovation encourages us to consume and consume. That is not compatible with having a habitable planet.
This comment is filled with maaa frieeeeends! Like everyone else I am stoked on the quality of this video and it's inspirational message. Great work Quartz!
Its a shame they didn’t mention the upcoming phosphate crisis of running out of essential nutrients for plants to grow, this is in the next few decades!!
The organic farmers that we saw in the beginning and at the end are what the best conventional farmers are doing today. Constant monitoring of the soil’s nutrients and organic matter in essential to sustainable farming. On our conventional farm since we switched to a no till operation 15 years ago we have noticed big difference in our organic matter and the soil’s ability to hold moisture has increased. We seed wheat, barley, canola, and peas in a four year rotation to help manage disease, weeds and insects so that we are not 100% reliant on pesticides. This also reduces our input costs. What I’m trying to say is that you don’t have to farm organically and drive food prices up at the consumer level to farm sustainability and ethically.
My family aren't farmers anymore, it never was. My Dad was a computer salesman. Half the time unemployed or half the time employed. Mom was a veterinarian and later a high school science teacher then an R.O.P. veterinary teacher.
I find it interesting how Bayer is still aggressively pursuing green revolution agriculture in the third world (and displacing and impoverishing peasant farmers in the process) even as we're coming to understand how unsustainable it is.
@Kaushal Batavia If we switched the world to organic agriculture which 2 billion people would you pick to starve due to the substantially lower yields?
@Kaushal Batavia Organic is the expensive and lower yielding way of "doing Agriculture". Organic farmers long have used compost and natural pesticides but they DO NOT reduce the per hectare cost. There is not enough compost/manure for a completely organic world. There are seed banks all over the world. Why should all seeds be free? Growers and plant breeders have introduced thousands of improved traits over the decades and they should be paid for that.
There's a movie called CODE46 I don't know how many people ever saw it,but it is worth a watch because there is a part that illustrates the female character supporting(really lead character) who has a vertical farm in her place. Acouple other dystopians all mention thee importance of having a vertical farm in one's home. Unfortunately, this is your future.
I feel another solution to aid in this is that people consume the necessary amount of food they need to live with the occasional treat. Also having less kids or no children could help since there are so many of us to begin with.
How to calculate. Say you buy a farm for 100000$ and every year maintenance and labor is 5000$. Then minimum return of investment is 5%. Say 10000$ per year.
5:48 "Feeding the future will require us to grow a lot more food" Wrong, we already produce enough plants to feed over 10 billion humans, the problem is that we use that to feed animals we eat and that we waste food.
You know we could just limit population growth, then we wouldn't need so much food and the farland could replenish itself more easily while slowly learning how to make it completely sustainable.
05:35 "And we've got to remember that overlying it all is the consumer, and the consumer is king and queen. And they ultimately will decide what they're going to eat, and therefore, what the future of agriculture is going to look like." It was a great profile on the responsibility of farmers, but they have none greater than to follow the demands of the consumer. We don't get to a sustainable, plant-based agriculture because farmers recognize the need and stop feeding all the plants to animals -- we consumers have to send that message to the marketplace, and the farmers need to respond. And I DON'T mean respond by demanding more subsidies to maintain obsolete flesh industries! Farmers can save the world by following the plant-based shift and not resisting until we have no choice but to stop subsidizing unsustainable production. Every farmer who feels the tradition of passing on their ranch or hog farm is more important than following necessary trends isn't gifting their children at all.
Very nicely done video. Glad to see a farmer growing organically and diversifying. We live in West-central MN and it's all mono crop around here; either field corn or soy beans. I see some grasses grown for hay. Thanks!
If those monocrops that surround you were all organic there would be substantially less yield. That means to make up for that lost yield many more acres would have to be ripped from nature. Regards.
02:43 "You look at the history of the spread of western civilization, it's in many regards, a story of people moving on after degrading the land. Individual droughts, or political events, or war with the neighbors; those kind of events are the kinds of things that will actually take down civilizations." Except now, the droughts are caused by 300 million people eating cows, which drink more water than they do, political events are indistinguishable from scientific truths, and war is a global prospect; nations that have oppress the have nots. The choices ahead are sumarized in the movies Mad Max: The Road Warrior, where society is in ruins, or The Hunger Games, where we have an ultra rich class lording over billions of poor. There's no "moving on" for agriculture anymore -- we have to adopt the plant-based future today, while we have sufficient food to end poverty and political ability to recognize humans of every race and animals of every species sharing the same fate. Nothing less than a social revolution will save us, and that means reshaping attitudes towards consumption and perpetual economic growth. "...a story of people moving on after degrading the land." This harkens to William F. Ruddiman's Early Anthropocene Hypothesis, where 10,000 years of animal agriculture has taken more carbon out of the earth than 350 years of fossil fuel combustion. Shaping plant-based food production and ending animal husbandry is our most powerful tool to optimize our land use, regrow forests and start pulling the carbon out of the atmosphere.
"The consumer is king....." and until we address that destructive conditioning nothing will change. King and consumer must be eliminated. Otherwise it's all just lip service with zero change. Farming practices will not make a difference if we don't attack the root causes. We aren't, and will not do that.
Zeitgeistboxee he's right in his sentiment, he said the consumer is king because they're the one's who dictate through purchases what they want the farmers to grow. Nothing wrong with that
Can anybody help me? I have this on-going argument with someone that if really "a vertical farming" would benefit us. He said it's just a waste profit. His look of future is kind of dumb for me you know. I want to believe that vertical farming is indeed one of the solution to the modern agriculture! But I'm quite having a trouble with the feasibility of this farming system... Hoping to find some answers here! If my explanation is quite not clear to you, feel free to ask with the reply.😀
5:20 I like how they just extrapolate that graph, as though it's a given that the human population will simply grow without bound forever. Same thing with climate change, nobody thinks about how we might just hit a plateau. The climate might become just humid and hot enough to provide huge crop yields for decades, but then never go any hotter (like in the Roman Climate Optimum)
Organic farming is nice, it is the way my family farmed when I was a child. The problem with that is it takes a tremendous amount of physical labor, therefore, limiting production. I do not believe in climate change as something new the earth has and always will continue to change. You are right in stressing the need for increased production with world population projected to push 9 billion by 2050. The thing that bothers me most about increaseing production is the takeing out of production of our most productive soils through urbanizatoion, with absoluately no regard for future generations, all in the name of progress "greed".
It should be organic but people shouldn't give up on GMOs, open source Gmo companies that aren't monopolized and that don't use pesticides or fertilizers is the future.
They are! monopolized nearly 50% of the world's seed supply is owned by chemical and pharma companies, 21% of gmo food's is owned by monsanto/Bayer pharmaceutical also own Roundup and 25% is owned by Dupont also greases your car
Space Monkey Yes! I hate this guilt by association. GMO technology is not inherently bad and we'd be damn stupid not to use every tool and technology at our disposal.
@@EnDSchultz1 be pro GMO labeling, if you're so proud. But you haven't allowed for being "damn stupid" for thinking every tool and technology is better than logic. We keep 1.5 billion cow which are double our biomass and outeat us 5:1. Overcoming shareholder greed is what saves the day, not rich assholes whom we can't seem to stop putting patents on our food.
GO VEGAN, and you won't need to worry about mono-cropping. Also stop wasting food and start composting in ALL CITIES. Here in Harlem people barely know how to recycle properly and no one bats an eye about it. Such a stupid culture.
@@devonrusinek5807 You do you but I know that you know you are wrong because you are trying to psychologically confuse people into seeing things your way and not learning of the truth.
Food production is mostly from massive corporations, family farms are disappearing. Just ask the rep at your local grocery store where your produce came from... Could be the other side of the planet... Especially with beef.
5:15 Hey, this graph looks familiar. What's it called? "Exponential growth?" What's he say? "We're going to need it all." I'm glad he finds this a problem that "we" can deal with.
you know that were actually growing more food per person than ever before, mainly in part thanks to fertilizers , produced by oils and that the earth is getting greener
Sadly, GMO massive farming corporations can sell the food wayyyy cheaper. The high tech farming & processing machinery probably didn't cost them anything either, due to incentives and discounts.
There are a number of other problems, the construction homes and neighborhoods on farm land, the destruction of vegetation, forests around the world, the soon be shortage of water due mostly from over population and then the end comes from pollution which we seem to control fairly well here in the U.S. but the rest of the world has yet to accept and apply any controls. We can die from any of these issues, nit juts because of climate change. I do believe we contribute but also believe we as a planet are doing nothing.
We speak about 9 Billion People but in reality, we are not feeding half of that even when we are having excess crops or food, we need to change first to appreciate Human lives and improving lifestyle, culture of sharing over the culture of selling or burning food before we exaggerate the numbers to drive new technologies who are only going to cater to restaurants and 5 star hotels
"Farmers will feel the impacts in their fields before we feel them in our grocery stores" is such a good line, and definitely true. Great video.
@Sweet James
agree
@Sweet James Maybe in your part of the world its ok. But here in my place (South East Asia), we are already suffering from negative impacts. Billions of dollars lost during typhoons every year, food shortage, etc. Maybe its better if you get out of your high horse and see the world as a whole rather than your small safe space bubble. I'm also a farmer for 17 years (Pechay, Lettuce, Potatoes, Strawberries, and Roses). I have already adapted to Vertical farming. Gave me 5-8 times more output.
"this is the ark we're building before the rain" - that hit me hard
How sweet.
@@dallassegno When you trust no one and be cynical about everything, it doesn't make you a happier person. Isn't it an amazing thing that people still believe in good things instead of distrust each other?
@Sweet James Well, you may have your reasons. I understand how much the wolrd sucks, there are full of liars etc.. But to me I don't think buying wrong products can hurt me in any form, unless they are poisonous. Even if they are real liars, I've still got inspired. Maybe I'll try to be a better person myself, it doesn't hurt. The reason why the world sucks is because of everyone of us (not everyone but me). While I can't change others' way of life, I'm still gratful to see positive ideas that makes me want to change.
@Sweet James պ
1:13 What song were they singing?
When it’s a farmer not a scientist talking about climate change, you should know it had gong too far
This was a heart warming video. It really shows how hard these farmers have to work for the future of mankind, for OUR future. It's truly inspirational.
It's noted that the farmers will feel the effects of climate change long before we do. However, WE consumers have the future of mankind. We have to redraw the food system, especially in the developed west, and the Standard American Diet that we have established as the marker for middle-class consumption. If the next Billion people born (and over 95% of them will be born in Africa and Asia) were to eat like Americans, our species is dead. We need to become more plant-based like the developing world, not the other way around!
@Sweet James your the kind of farmer I would drink beer with
I just came here because I would like to say that while they raised some important issues in this video, the solutions they portrayed are not at all solutions. I'm a student of Agroecology in university so I can say with some property that organic farming as it was portrayed here does not at all changes how we produce and distribute food, it's only difference from conventional agriculture is that it ceases to use chemicals. This is a problem, as is the very system of food production that it keeps that must be replaced in order for meaning change to happen. We need a much more deep and complex change. A system change. Organic farming is not that! It still has a high degree of machinery use (and so fossil fuel), water usage and outside input (for example the manure he talks about in the video, where is this coming from? Organic agriculture does not adress that) usage. It doesn't get better with hydroponics.
So no, this is NOT the future of farming, because if it is, funnily, it will not be on longer future. As those two kinds of farming portrayed do not address the reasons why we are in the situation of climate change in the first place and so it cannot sustain life in the planet on a long-term.
So we actually need a cultural and spiritual change, a fundamental change in the way humanity understands itself and see its place in this world and our interactions with it. To begin with, I recommend a read on Permaculture.
"...So we actually need a cultural and spiritual change, a fundamental change in the way humanity understands itself and see its place in this world and our interactions with it."
very true.
@Sweet James way to boast :) 20 years and still didn't learn
Well Said!! Watch The SOIL SOLUTION. Nature is the answer.....
Indoor vertical farming is the future. Less water, no soil, artificial lighting, and local.
David Lopez Aquaponics, smaller pollyculture operations and vertical farming will be needed to replace the soil people will use up for housing.
They are on the right path but not off the path yet.
I farm .78 urban acres and can produce almost 10,000 lbs of food every year.
With their monoculture row techniques I would be lucky to produce 1000 lbs.
A nuclear power plant of 1 GW may power the lighting to feed 100.000 people (complete supply of calories).
Nobody If you take into account the area of each row and number of levels, it's quite large how much food you can produce is such a small space of land by stacking on top of each other. For example, if you can grow an acre of land and produce 10,000 pounds of food every year why can't you take an acre of land, stack 30-40 levels with hundreds of rows and produce 40,000 - 60,000 pounds per year?
Are you an expert in organic soil-based vertical agriculture?
Notice that there aren't any animal pens in these operations. Can you imagine steers grazing on these plants? It illustrates the non-sustainability of meat production. Eat low on the food web.
Decomposing/oxidizing cow manure is probably the largest greenhouse gas contributor world wide... I live in a country that also uses it on every field but the best way to use it will be always mixed up in a ratio with other decomposing matter like 30% leafs,fruits,peals etc 30% cow manure 30% recycle paper,cardboard,wood chips, sticks etc in that way the soil will be way more balance in terms of holding moisture and nutrition. Also too much cow manure can essentially "burn" your crops.
very true, composting is the way to go for this. we need to produce less waste closing more and more the cycle of production until it becomes a natural system
At least some part of the global food waste could go to more compost
It is also possible to get fuel from manure using anaerobic digesters. This traps the methane that would have been released so it can be used for fuel. The leftover is a good manure/compost substitute.
Let's not forget the C:N ratio should be 24:1 for soil microbes to compost efficiently. Cattle Manure is 17:1 so they could pea straw to help raise it.
Cow manure is better off processed as biogas first. Use the methane as fuel, and then use it for soil conditioning.
I feel sad when the *World's 2nd most visited* website doesn't have issues like this on trending, instead typical Hollywood baloney. 😔
+Wo Long most of the viewers are brainwashed by the MSM and the ones that lead and manage these huge websites. It's their fault for being gullible but it's also the fault of the people that own these websites for not stopping the brainwashing because of greed, imagine if all the environment around us would be designed to make us smarter, wiser, to increase our IQ, instead of doing the opposite, or at least not promoting stupidity and low IQ content.
idiocracy .. was right
watch the movie and you will see
@Wo Long TH-cam MANUALLLY PUT VIDEOS THEY THINK WILL GET ATTENTION ON TRENDING. Educate yourself, because you surely need it
A correction for 2:13
For these farmers all this effort is worth it, because for them the future of food has alot to do with the premium price of organic crops
This is really high quality... Nice job
in new york organic farmers are using sewage. imagine the toxins in that...
James if it’s treated. There are none.
4:55 i am really angry about how this man ruined his opportunity to make the "all eggs in one basket" pun
I absolutely love that you made the soil a focus. Soil is so critically important. Concentional farming destroys millions of acres of heirable land every year.
i see a close family with full belly and hearts. thats rare
05:52 um excuse you that was perfectly good pasta
Innovation is awesome
the best solution its gmos in vertical farming because then we can let that land previously used to crops to grow forest
less space, less price, less impact
A lot more energy too dumbass.
Az4212 knowledge thirsty most of our crops go to feed animals. Get off ur fatass and go buy some lentils.
TGiSH IllidanServer and with enough renewables you could probably achieve net zero in energy costs
That or grass land for more efficient and better producing livestock as well
leebog31 link to the study please? I'd like to make sure I'm looking at the one you're talking about
3:46 That's my Minecraft sugarcane farm
Lol nice!
They got the idea...we like permaculture and food forest too!
Awesome, clean, editing 😍
I get an Interstellar vibe, nicely done!
I want a farm that no one can see because if the manure ever hits the fan, people will go to great lengths to eat. I’ve been really interested in what Kimbal musk is doing & other aquaponic farmers are doing.
This family is so sweet & knows it is better to prepare than doing nothing at all, much respect & love to them.
05:13 "That's because the human race will consume more food in the next 50 years than it has in the past 10,000 years combined."
This is admittedly terrifying, but it signifies what a unique point in history we occupy. We must understand all that history has taught us, but all the rules have changed. We are at the nexus of many powerful forces, including technology, overreliance on technology, a globalization via the Internet wherein the younger generation has more in common with people their age in faraway countries than they do with their parents; a globalization that makes corporations more powerful than countries. We have the ability to solve things that never before could be solved, and the ability to end our civilization with our sheer population of mindless consumer units voting for mindless populist governments.
The human race hasn't faced extinction in a long time. Let's hope we find our survival instinct and awaken to our challenge.
You can’t just say “knock on wood” you have to actually do it. Otherwise the gods just roll their eyes.
I love videos like this. very informative
Great video and good luck to these farmers, I hope big Agra doesn’t try to destroy their optimism and innovation. The future is about food more than the latest iPhones I think.
This is the opposite of innovation.
Why not both?
@@miriareu tech innovation is not all there is to innovation. Tech innovation encourages us to consume and consume. That is not compatible with having a habitable planet.
The minute 7:13, reminded me of my dad when I was a kid.
Better to embrace change on your own terms than wait until it embraces you by force. Beautiful
This comment is filled with maaa frieeeeends! Like everyone else I am stoked on the quality of this video and it's inspirational message. Great work Quartz!
have to use led grow light or can not keep balance as will consume huge power.
I’m watching this because of online school lol
Its a shame they didn’t mention the upcoming phosphate crisis of running out of essential nutrients for plants to grow, this is in the next few decades!!
Beautifully edited and superbly shot Video.💯 Very Inspiring too.
"It's not just another gadget" - that hit me hard Save the world Food and Water!
The organic farmers that we saw in the beginning and at the end are what the best conventional farmers are doing today. Constant monitoring of the soil’s nutrients and organic matter in essential to sustainable farming. On our conventional farm since we switched to a no till operation 15 years ago we have noticed big difference in our organic matter and the soil’s ability to hold moisture has increased. We seed wheat, barley, canola, and peas in a four year rotation to help manage disease, weeds and insects so that we are not 100% reliant on pesticides. This also reduces our input costs. What I’m trying to say is that you don’t have to farm organically and drive food prices up at the consumer level to farm sustainability and ethically.
Follow me on Twitter @AGRICade for more information.
My family aren't farmers anymore, it never was. My Dad was a computer salesman. Half the time unemployed or half the time employed. Mom was a veterinarian and later a high school science teacher then an R.O.P. veterinary teacher.
I find it interesting how Bayer is still aggressively pursuing green revolution agriculture in the third world (and displacing and impoverishing peasant farmers in the process) even as we're coming to understand how unsustainable it is.
Buffoonish comment.
@@DukeGMOLOL takes a buffoon to project at the level you are
@@tacoslegit1556 --Found another one who believes that organic agriculture is sustainable.
@Kaushal Batavia If we switched the world to organic agriculture which 2 billion people would you pick to starve due to the substantially lower yields?
@Kaushal Batavia Organic is the expensive and lower yielding way of "doing Agriculture". Organic farmers long have used compost and natural pesticides but they DO NOT reduce the per hectare cost. There is not enough compost/manure for a completely organic world.
There are seed banks all over the world.
Why should all seeds be free? Growers and plant breeders have introduced thousands of improved traits over the decades and they should be paid for that.
There's a movie called CODE46 I don't know how many people ever saw it,but it is worth a watch because there is a part that illustrates the female character supporting(really lead character) who has a vertical farm in her place. Acouple other dystopians all mention thee importance of having a vertical farm in one's home. Unfortunately, this is your future.
High quality Content front Quartz as always.
Climate changes regardless, they ship strawberries to Michigan form California, when did Michigan stop being able to grow plants?
3:44 What kinda farm is this? Where are all the GPU's
Hello how do I get into contact with the vertical farm info as well as the otormans
Very pleasing to see kids just being kids instead of device zombies
Cleaner healthyer food. Whats not to love. No pesticides or fertiliser clean fresh
What the hell? Only 2k likes? Deserves waaay more for this high quality.
I feel another solution to aid in this is that people consume the necessary amount of food they need to live with the occasional treat. Also having less kids or no children could help since there are so many of us to begin with.
How to calculate. Say you buy a farm for 100000$ and every year maintenance and labor is 5000$. Then minimum return of investment is 5%. Say 10000$ per year.
Thought provoking... clarity and quality of the content is truely amazing as always... good job Quartz... eager for more...
5:48
"Feeding the future will require us to grow a lot more food"
Wrong, we already produce enough plants to feed over 10 billion humans, the problem is that we use that to feed animals we eat and that we waste food.
ggzh a Argue With Everyone 😂
????
This channel is just epic, keep up the good work guys
what if the seeds itself is genetically modified? Is there still purely organic plant seeds that are being sold? I really hope someone can tell me
Advance green house may be good for micro growth but hight refresher rate
There are all these warning signs when I was a kid, and my dad just looked the other way, and now look at what I have to deal with.
So many abandoned malls, parking Garages, Manufacturing plants
You know we could just limit population growth, then we wouldn't need so much food and the farland could replenish itself more easily while slowly learning how to make it completely sustainable.
05:35 "And we've got to remember that overlying it all is the consumer, and the consumer is king and queen. And they ultimately will decide what they're going to eat, and therefore, what the future of agriculture is going to look like."
It was a great profile on the responsibility of farmers, but they have none greater than to follow the demands of the consumer. We don't get to a sustainable, plant-based agriculture because farmers recognize the need and stop feeding all the plants to animals -- we consumers have to send that message to the marketplace, and the farmers need to respond. And I DON'T mean respond by demanding more subsidies to maintain obsolete flesh industries! Farmers can save the world by following the plant-based shift and not resisting until we have no choice but to stop subsidizing unsustainable production. Every farmer who feels the tradition of passing on their ranch or hog farm is more important than following necessary trends isn't gifting their children at all.
Share this on social media
Just finished watching what happens next season 1. It made me think more of the basic things. Thanks guys. 🙏🙏
Watch season too! We have one more episode coming out tomorrow. th-cam.com/play/PLWHhRzSHrMU-pUX_R8creEG6gq3LI_69q.html
What was that orange salad dressing they used??
Very nicely done video. Glad to see a farmer growing organically and diversifying. We live in West-central MN and it's all mono crop around here; either field corn or soy beans. I see some grasses grown for hay. Thanks!
If those monocrops that surround you were all organic there would be substantially less yield. That means to make up for that lost yield many more acres would have to be ripped from nature. Regards.
Does plowing the land not release carbon?
This video produced a lot of good proverbs.
02:43 "You look at the history of the spread of western civilization, it's in many regards, a story of people moving on after degrading the land. Individual droughts, or political events, or war with the neighbors; those kind of events are the kinds of things that will actually take down civilizations."
Except now, the droughts are caused by 300 million people eating cows, which drink more water than they do, political events are indistinguishable from scientific truths, and war is a global prospect; nations that have oppress the have nots. The choices ahead are sumarized in the movies Mad Max: The Road Warrior, where society is in ruins, or The Hunger Games, where we have an ultra rich class lording over billions of poor. There's no "moving on" for agriculture anymore -- we have to adopt the plant-based future today, while we have sufficient food to end poverty and political ability to recognize humans of every race and animals of every species sharing the same fate. Nothing less than a social revolution will save us, and that means reshaping attitudes towards consumption and perpetual economic growth.
"...a story of people moving on after degrading the land." This harkens to William F. Ruddiman's Early Anthropocene Hypothesis, where 10,000 years of animal agriculture has taken more carbon out of the earth than 350 years of fossil fuel combustion. Shaping plant-based food production and ending animal husbandry is our most powerful tool to optimize our land use, regrow forests and start pulling the carbon out of the atmosphere.
I was reminded of the film Diet for a New America. Their content is complimentary .
"The consumer is king....." and until we address that destructive conditioning nothing will change. King and consumer must be eliminated. Otherwise it's all just lip service with zero change. Farming practices will not make a difference if we don't attack the root causes. We aren't, and will not do that.
Zeitgeistboxee he's right in his sentiment, he said the consumer is king because they're the one's who dictate through purchases what they want the farmers to grow. Nothing wrong with that
Can anybody help me? I have this on-going argument with someone that if really "a vertical farming" would benefit us. He said it's just a waste profit. His look of future is kind of dumb for me you know. I want to believe that vertical farming is indeed one of the solution to the modern agriculture! But I'm quite having a trouble with the feasibility of this farming system...
Hoping to find some answers here!
If my explanation is quite not clear to you, feel free to ask with the reply.😀
7:13 Such bliss...
5:20 I like how they just extrapolate that graph, as though it's a given that the human population will simply grow without bound forever. Same thing with climate change, nobody thinks about how we might just hit a plateau. The climate might become just humid and hot enough to provide huge crop yields for decades, but then never go any hotter (like in the Roman Climate Optimum)
1:13 What song were they singing?
Source for the calories graph they showed?
Organic farming is nice, it is the way my family farmed when I was a child. The problem with that is it takes a tremendous amount of physical labor, therefore, limiting production. I do not believe in climate change as something new the earth has and always will continue to change. You are right in stressing the need for increased production with world population projected to push 9 billion by 2050. The thing that bothers me most about increaseing production is the takeing out of production of our most productive soils through urbanizatoion, with absoluately no regard for future generations, all in the name of progress "greed".
0:03 🚸🤝🚨 0:31 Why? Because instant gratification society seeks it. 1:07 🎯 2:20 🌱🍀 4:38 🚨🤝🚸 5:39 Nope 6:10 💡
It should be organic but people shouldn't give up on GMOs, open source Gmo companies that aren't monopolized and that don't use pesticides or fertilizers is the future.
They are! monopolized nearly 50% of the world's seed supply is owned by chemical and pharma companies, 21% of gmo food's is owned by monsanto/Bayer pharmaceutical also own Roundup and 25% is owned by Dupont also greases your car
why don't you make your own GMO seed then? Instead of bitching about it. You know, CRISPR/CAS9 is quiet affordable.
Space Monkey Yes! I hate this guilt by association. GMO technology is not inherently bad and we'd be damn stupid not to use every tool and technology at our disposal.
@@EnDSchultz1 be pro GMO labeling, if you're so proud. But you haven't allowed for being "damn stupid" for thinking every tool and technology is better than logic. We keep 1.5 billion cow which are double our biomass and outeat us 5:1. Overcoming shareholder greed is what saves the day, not rich assholes whom we can't seem to stop putting patents on our food.
GO VEGAN, and you won't need to worry about mono-cropping. Also stop wasting food and start composting in ALL CITIES. Here in Harlem people barely know how to recycle properly and no one bats an eye about it. Such a stupid culture.
If that works for you, then great. However, I'm a believer that some meat is good to have in the diet (eg elk, salmon, shellfish).
@@devonrusinek5807 You do you but I know that you know you are wrong because you are trying to psychologically confuse people into seeing things your way and not learning of the truth.
Food production is mostly from massive corporations, family farms are disappearing. Just ask the rep at your local grocery store where your produce came from... Could be the other side of the planet... Especially with beef.
sir can I know the cost of soil less farming, what are the foods to be grown in that can anyone tell me about that
building up is best for indoor farming
but the problem is that not enough people like this family realizes the problem of the climate change
5:15 Hey, this graph looks familiar. What's it called? "Exponential growth?" What's he say? "We're going to need it all." I'm glad he finds this a problem that "we" can deal with.
when did we eat 355B calories
Excuse me, where can I get the datasheet of the chart showing estimated daily calories consumed in this videos?
you know that were actually growing more food per person than ever before, mainly in part thanks to fertilizers , produced by oils and that the earth is getting greener
One of the best farming videos I have seen! Great job!
Sadly, GMO massive farming corporations can sell the food wayyyy cheaper. The high tech farming & processing machinery probably didn't cost them anything either, due to incentives and discounts.
Well I mean GMO isn't bad...
this is the real content .
Nice report...thanks for sharing!
There are a number of other problems, the construction homes and neighborhoods on farm land, the destruction of vegetation, forests around the world, the soon be shortage of water due mostly from over population and then the end comes from pollution which we seem to control fairly well here in the U.S. but the rest of the world has yet to accept and apply any controls. We can die from any of these issues, nit juts because of climate change. I do believe we contribute but also believe we as a planet are doing nothing.
The Ortman family are awesome.
We speak about 9 Billion People but in reality, we are not feeding half of that even when we are having excess crops or food, we need to change first to appreciate Human lives and improving lifestyle, culture of sharing over the culture of selling or burning food before we exaggerate the numbers to drive new technologies who are only going to cater to restaurants and 5 star hotels
Living in Patagonia, where food barely grows, owing a farm, I can say that complaining and growing fake food indoors will destroy food as we know it.
i like the egg sorting thing
What about Rudolf Steiner?
Looks like there are now colossal crop failures around the world now. Too much rain and too much cold weather.
"New York City will be underwater by 2012" Totally true
Yes.
Wonderful. Thanks
Outstanding productions....just found your channel!
So grow food using permaculture techniques like we did centuries ago lol ok great glad you guys figured out what us homesteaders already knew
It's not so much about "organic" it's about biodiverse agriculture.
Good quality video right here.
I want an episode just about that indoor farm
where do I sign up?
Can I get the references please!!