Is a Fetus a Living Person?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 27

  • @danielleeper8719
    @danielleeper8719 4 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Fetus in Latin means little child.

    • @TheLivy81
      @TheLivy81 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I did not know that. Thank you for sharing.

  • @PetrusJosephus
    @PetrusJosephus 4 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    You are doing wonderful work all you at Catholic Answers!

  • @guillelainez
    @guillelainez 4 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    It bothers me how people can be so ignorant.

    • @ironymatt
      @ironymatt 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The most insidious lies are the ones they tell themselves

    • @TheLivy81
      @TheLivy81 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You used the right word

    • @wordforever117
      @wordforever117 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I used to be pro-abortion. I was ignorant for sure, but it did not occur to me to do any research because I thought I already knew everything I needed to know.

  • @dominicedwin5067
    @dominicedwin5067 4 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    Babies lives matters(BLM)
    Pro life for life 💪🏻 💓
    Our lady of guadalupe , pray for the unborn. Amen

  • @ethanjsc
    @ethanjsc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Omg just that first line by Trent was straight fire

  • @a.k.4486
    @a.k.4486 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Yes she/he is a living person!

  • @lynncw9202
    @lynncw9202 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Simple answer....yes

  • @selcukkaradag1596
    @selcukkaradag1596 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    trent you are well-educated person I love catholic answer they are like a walking library

  • @crobeastness
    @crobeastness 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Sadly I don't think most people can understand the virtue and wisdom of that, even religious ones (referring to your last quote).

  • @ginlydon4891
    @ginlydon4891 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    At the beginning, unique DNA is present. At 12-19 weeks, unique fingerprints fully form (not even identical twins share this). Not one aborted baby had a day in court, no appeals permitted. Their DNA and fingerprints never entered into evidence. ... Innocent little human lives intentionally and mercilessly ended, how many thousands of times every day in our world?

  • @mnmmnm925
    @mnmmnm925 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    0:50, 5:00, 6:45, 9:13

  • @bernierico33
    @bernierico33 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Pro-Life all the way! May God bless you all! ❤️

  • @ProLifeChloe
    @ProLifeChloe ปีที่แล้ว

    🔥🔥🔥

  • @boncatholique
    @boncatholique 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    People will justify abortion by arguing that fetus it is not living thing.

  • @andrefouche9682
    @andrefouche9682 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If a baby is just left on it's own without parent support it will die, so a baby is just as dependent on it's mom than a fetus.

  • @amaliegarsia
    @amaliegarsia 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    🙏🏼

  • @reggiestickleback7794
    @reggiestickleback7794 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is this a satisfactory proof, Catholic Answers?
    Generally, all cells have the complete information necessary for a human being, both gametes and somatic cells. The genetic material is complete, though limited via gene expression controls. In other words, the information is present, but only some of the code is activated.
    A zygote is the only cell where the information is activated as to the development of an entire human organism, rather than the production of a single tissue. A human being, a human person, is a WHOLE comprised of a multicellular composite of living parts “cells” which are known as PARTS.
    Since, as proven above, a zygote is the only cell genetically ordered to the production of a human WHOLE, we can consider the zygote to be a WHOLE in itself. As it is a WHOLE in intrinsic actualization of the emergent properties known to a human whole (arms, legs, consciousness). A zygote is not a PART but a whole that generated its own PARTS. Furthermore, it is not a potential WHOLE, as we see the actualization of a human WHOLE continues well beyond birth.
    This argument assumes, philosophically, that BEING is the definition of a human person, rather than “possessing consciousness”. And a human WHOLE begins to “be” (grow, develop, homeostasis) at conception.
    Is there any literature that can improve my understanding of the personhood of a zygote, if my proofs are weak? Thank you for reading. God bless

  • @TheVir1177
    @TheVir1177 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    No, it is not a person at all, inside a mother can the mother decide to have or not to have a baby is inside of a person. People and science call a fetus without the mother is just a fusion, living because the mother.

  • @charnelallan7159
    @charnelallan7159 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Preach the gospel the world needs right now omg u have a platform to reach millions of viewers yet ur topics of discussion r sooo shallow use ur platform to bring people to christ we r living in the apocalypse days the world needs the gospel the preachings of the holy spirit sanctification not this omg

  • @airmav64
    @airmav64 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    your not considered really alive until you breathe the breath of life

    • @js96111
      @js96111 ปีที่แล้ว

      So if a baby is born choking on its umbilical cord and hasn't breathed air through his lungs yet, can I stab him in the head? That's pretty silly. Embryos still take in and filter oxygen from the very early stages of development, just not with their lungs.