قال رسول الله ﷺ : " أحب الكَلام إلى الله أربع: سبحان الله، والحمْد لله، ولا إله إلّا الله، والله أكبر، لا يضرّك بأيهن بدأت." وقال تعالى﴿ فَاذكُرُونِي أَذْكُرْكُم و اشْكُرُوا لِي وَلَا تَكْفُرُونِ ﴾
@@sammylong3704why u assuming that the injeel was a book written down? The injeel is the revelation revelead by God unto Jesus and is the revelation that Jesus taught and preached and practiced its not harder than that
@Hamza's Den:---Notice how Zakir Hussein talks about (Q)---Souce. Like anyone has ever laid their hands on such "source". The correct position is that (Q)--Source never existed. It is a hypothetical construct as an Aid to scholastic research and propositions.
What is the testimony of Jesus, whether these are his statements in red letters in the Bible or people have changed them, we can only judge if we look at the Quran.
Ask the Vatican Were is the injeel they have it . Why keep asking the Muslim who never made the claim on the existence of the injeel it was the lord of the heavens. Asking a Muslim were is the injeel to make it look like, you have an amazing point 😂 You don't have nothing but to gaslight a Muslim to answer something what only Allah the lord of the heavens can answer.
The Vatican did purchase an Aramiac 4th century Gospel of Barnabas in 2010 that found in Turkey for $50 million. So I personally believe the Vatican library has the Injeel locked in its vault..Catholic church is hiding it...
Let’s take the Gospel of John, the fourth Gospel. Is there good evidence to believe that what we read in John’s Gospel is a true account of what Jesus actually said and did? Up until a few hundred years ago, no-one really questioned whether John’s Gospel was historical. But with growing scepticism over the reality of God and the supernatural (a philosophical and cultural movement known as the Enlightenment), scholars began to suggest other explanations for the origins of the Gospel. Against the traditional view of the Gospel having been written by a disciple of Jesus and eyewitness to his life, death and resurrection, they argued that the Gospel was, in reality, written by someone living hundreds of years later, and hundreds of miles away. And the concepts in John, they said, were too Greek, and not Jewish enough (as the other three Gospels, Matthew, Mark and Luke, were). John’s idea that Jesus was ‘God in the flesh’, for example, was said to reflect much later developments in Christian theology. So for these reasons, by around 1900, most New Testament scholars believed that John’s Gospel could not be considered as reliable history.
The Catholic Encyclopedia, II, page 263: “The baptismal formula was changed from the name of Jesus Christ to the words Father, Son, and Holy Spirit by the Catholic Church in the second century.” Edmund Schlink, The Doctrine of Baptism, page 28: “The baptismal command in its Matthew 28:19 form can not be the historical origin of Christian baptism. At the very least, it must be assumed that the text has been transmitted in a form expanded by the [Catholic] church. wake up! they had to add the trinity later Many Christians use this verse to prove the existence of the Trinity. For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. (1 John 5:7) The issue with this verse is that it is universally recognized by Biblical scholars and historians, including thirty-two Christian scholars of the highest eminence backed by fifty cooperating Christian denominations, as being inserted by the Church later. Since it was proven that this verse is a fabrication, it has been deleted from some of the later Bibles, such as the Revised Standard Version and the New Revised Standard Version...,,.,
Ttthe doctrine of Alpha and Omega is a sad and unfortunate example of mankind’s tampering with the Word of God. It shows how doctrine is contracted by men to justify false beliefs. The phrase “Saying, I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last” (Revelation 1:11) which is found in the King James Version was not in the original Greek texts. Therefore, the Alpha Omega phrase is not found in virtually any ancient texts, nor is it mentioned, even as a footnote, in any modern translation., This phrase does NOT occur in NA28, UBS5, W&H, Souter, Majority Text, THGNT, SBL, R&P Byzantine Text, Orthodox Text, Jerome's Latin Vulgate, & the Clementine Text. The phrase only occurs in the Textus Receptus. This phrase is not even footnoted in UBS5 and UBS4. The only MSS listed as having this phrase in NA28 is the manuscript of the commentary on Revelation by Andreas of Caesarea. However, "I [am] the first and the last" occurs in P025. Therefore, there appears to be very little dispute that "I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last" is not part of the original text of Revelation at Rev 1:11. in many places, the trinitaria scribes mistraslate. e.g. they translate words that mean 'revere' or 'homage' into worship. this is truly sad that they mislead many to eternal fiya Matthew 2:11 - The NRSV correctly reads “and they knelt down and paid him homage.” The NIV has the magi worship Jesus instead of merely paying homage, most likely reflecting the piety of the translators and their audience: “and they bowed down and worshipped him.” The NIV does, however, correctly translate the same word (proskuneō) as “pay homage” in Mark 15:19, where the soldiers pay mock homage to Jesus as king. [See BeDuhn, Truth in Translation, pp. 44-45.] John 7:53-8:11, often described as “The Passage of the Woman Caught in Adultery” (passage de adultera), is famous for several reasons. The pleasant reason is that it is one of the most dramatic displays of the grace of God in the Bible. But there is also a more difficult reason that needs to be addressed: this passage was likely not in the original version of the Gospel of John, but was added later at an undeterminable time and for an unknown reason. How should the church treat this passage? The text-critical evidence is overwhelming: this passage was almost certainly not in the original version of the Gospel of John. This is hardly an answer, however, but an entirely new question. For nearly every contemporary Bible, even if the text is given double-brackets or italicized or given a smaller font, contains this passage, thereby declaring to today’s reader that it is part of the Gospel of John
Bruce Metzger, the premier New Testament textual critic, writes: “Matthew and Luke suppress or weaken references in Mark to such human emotions of Jesus as grief and anger and amazement as well as Jesus’ unrequited love; they also omit Mark’s statement that Jesus’ friends thought he was beside himself”. He explains further, that: “The later gospels omit what might imply that Jesus was unable to accomplish what he willed…and also omit questions asked by Jesus which might be taken to imply his ignorance.”[3] Metzger continues further by enumerating instances where Matthew and Luke soften Mark’s statements which might minimize the majesty of Jesus and replaced it with illustrations of a more alluring and authoritative Jesus. In the story of the fig tree as found in Mark, the disciples did not notice the withering of the tree until next morning. For Matthew, this seemed less dramatic and unimpressive, and hence in his narrative the tree withered at once, leaving the disciples in shock and amazement. Matthew and Luke were adamant in changing the words of Jesus. They wanted to make Jesus say what they wanted people to believe, “reflecting a later stage of theological understanding than that in Mark.” (Metzger, pg 83) It seems quite clear that during both the pre and post gospel stages of the gospel traditions transmission, the available material was molded, filtered and changed in direct correlation to the Christological convictions of those who handled the traditions. It is important to stress that this is not a case of the evangelists’ mere differing in emphasis; rather there are numerous occasions when the later gospel writers go out of their way to modify and alter the earlier version. Therefore, if we wish to come close to the historical Jesus in the gospels, it is a good starting point to compare the stories in the various gospels, to discern where the story has altered.
Bruce Metzger, the premier New Testament textual critic, writes: “Matthew and Luke suppress or weaken references in Mark to such human emotions of Jesus as grief and anger and amazement as well as Jesus’ unrequited love; they also omit Mark’s statement that Jesus’ friends thought he was beside himself”. He explains further, that: “The later gospels omit what might imply that Jesus was unable to accomplish what he willed…and also omit questions asked by Jesus which might be taken to imply his ignorance.”[3] Metzger continues further by enumerating instances where Matthew and Luke soften Mark’s statements which might minimize the majesty of Jesus and replaced it with illustrations of a more alluring and authoritative Jesus. In the story of the fig tree as found in Mark, the disciples did not notice the withering of the tree until next morning. For Matthew, this seemed less dramatic and unimpressive, and hence in his narrative the tree withered at once, leaving the disciples in shock and amazement. Matthew and Luke were adamant in changing the words of Jesus. They wanted to make Jesus say what they wanted people to believe, “reflecting a later stage of theological understanding than that in Mark.” (Metzger, pg 83) It seems quite clear that during both the pre and post gospel stages of the gospel traditions transmission, the available material was molded, filtered and changed in direct correlation to the Christological convictions of those who handled the traditions. It is important to stress that this is not a case of the evangelists’ mere differing in emphasis; rather there are numerous occasions when the later gospel writers go out of their way to modify and alter the earlier version. Therefore, if we wish to come close to the historical Jesus in the gospels, it is a good starting point to compare the stories in the various gospels, to discern where the story has altered.
Many Christians use this verse to prove the existence of the Trinity. For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. (1 John 5:7) The issue with this verse is that it is universally recognized by Biblical scholars and historians, including thirty-two Christian scholars of the highest eminence backed by fifty cooperating Christian denominations, as being inserted by the Church later. Since it was proven that this verse is a fabrication, it has been deleted from some of the later Bibles, such as the Revised Standard Version and the New Revised Standard Version.
What about “He who is without s77n, should k4st the f1r5t”? On the other hand, every other early manuscript omits it, notably including two of the earliest and most reliable manuscripts, called Papyrus 66 and Papyrus 75 that date from the second or early third century and were found in Egypt (closer to where John wrote). Codex Sinaiticus, the oldest complete copy of the New Testament (c. 325 CE), does not include it either. No pastor or theologian from the eastern side of the early church references it until the tenth century. In their commentaries and sermons, they go directly from John 7:52 to 8:12 (keep in mind that current chapter and verse breakdowns were added later). Finally, all the earliest translations of the Greek New Testament (Syriac, Coptic, Armenian, Old Latin, and Georgian) skip this story as well.
My question to the Muslims... In your opinion, what was the purpose of Allah revealing the Injil to Jesus when the Injil couldn't even outlast the letters of Paul? The Injil has to have the shortest shelf life out of all the revelations Muslims believe Allah revealed.
Jesus was sent not but to the lost sheep of house of Israel. not up to us to preserve it. go ask christians what they did with eveangelion (Injeel, the Gospel Jesus was preaching not Mark, Luke, John, Mathew nobody's biographies). since they corrupted their scripture. God sent another to preserve the teachings in Quran.Quran is preserved with radio carbon dated menu scripts in original language and memorized from cover to cover.
@@Noble_One Your response didn't answer the question I asked. Any other Muslim giving this guy a thumbs up for his useless comment want to give an answer?
the injeel was a revelation that was revealed to jesus the purpose of that revelation is to guide the isrealites at the time of jesus the isrealites at that time are the ones who meant to preserve that revelation but rather they throw it away or sell it or even destored it just like it's mentioned in the quran same thing goes with the torah that was revealed to moses so they not only failed when it comes to one revelation but also with another revelation hope you get the message
@@areshensem My question is specifically about the span of time that the Injil was relevant. Almost 2000 years have passed since Jesus preached his message, and according to Muslims, there is no trace of the Injil that the Qur'an mentions outside of the Qur'an itself, yet Paul's letters, which were written during the same period as the Injil, were copied and are preserved to the present day. So what was the purpose of Allah revealing the Injil to Jesus when the Injil couldn't even outlast the letters of Paul?
My message to every Muslim, my brother or sister, the owner of the channel, I know that I do not have the right to comment on your channel, but as God bears witness, our circumstances are harsh and you forced me to do this, something. Please forgive me. I honor you because you are men. We are women. You cannot go out or work like you, my brother. Where is the brotherhood of faith in your hearts? We are women. Brotherhood. There is no mercy, no compassion, no humanity. Giving good news to the patient is the greatest hope of waiting for what we want.'''''''''''''''' ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' how much. I called, how many words I spoke, and how hard we are, but there is no life to whom you call. Brother, we are with us. My mother orders us food from the restaurant. Zawidah and today. My mother went. She was crying. She said why is Yami crying? You said, my daughter. I'm asking. God is mine. He consoles me with death. She said it. why. Yami. You claim against us. She said: My daughter, today is a friend. The restaurant. Why? The most beautiful people in terms of people. I ask God, my daughter. God is gathering me. Death alone is a better insect. Who is this foolish and this insignificant? True, true. I am saying this. It diminishes my value and my respect. But, brother. I swear to God that I did not say this, kiss your boots. I was so hungry that my conscience no longer allowed me to let her go and ask us for food. I kiss your boots, brother, and I ask you by God Almighty and in the Book of God, brother, I kiss your boots, brother. We have nothing to do with it, brother. Even a thousand Yemeni riyals. We can buy us a kilo of minutes. 00967717018744. Have mercy on him. He who is in the show will have mercy on you. He who is in heaven will have mercy on you. Brother. This is my number. The one who can help us. Message me on WhatsApp. We will send it. The full name will transfer us as much as he can. May God reward you well. God knows that the owner of the house takes us out in the street in the rain because of... Please see my condition for yourselves, I ask you by God, the Ever-Living, the Ever-Subsisting, to help me, and God is the Great, even at night we cannot sleep from fear. We have neither mattresses nor blankets to keep us warm from the cold. Everything has been drowned by the rain, and we have no one but God. Then you, my brothers, kiss your boots. Do not let me be disappointed. Help us as much as you can. So, do you please us that we live in this place? We are girls and we have no one. Our father died in a car accident. Consider us your daughters and offer and help me as much as you can. May God reward you well =>[[}>] ^][°] €] €] €] €...' ',,,,,,,,;-'-"!;'(')"\|\(/()\|¶€(/)'|\€\>|\≧≫;;/:; -/;;!;?;"????✓]}>>]}]}]\>]}>×}✓\🎉🎉😢😢!;";!":!!:!😢🎉::!!:"::😢🎉..,.,.,.,..
You know that Muslims look for proof in people's claims because of their experience throughout history, so if you are honest, make a live stream and show who you are and what kind of situation you are in, otherwise....
@@IboGetsuu well actually yes that's actually true (whether you like it or not) Should we remind you what's the Aramaic word the Jesus used for god almighty ???
@@ryder-m5r iknow Allaha. But the stupid Christians believe in 3Gods and they believe that Jesus is God astachfuallah! So Dont talk with me, ik what i'm talking about!!!
Well no in the sense that we dont worship Jesus but yes as in there is only 1 God so if a Christian worships and a Muslim worships its directed to the one God. Where that God accepts the Christians or Muslims worship is a seperate detail
Nobody has ever asked me about the Injeel whipe doing dawah. Nobody can definitively tell me what it is because nobody knows. It's simpler to stick to the Quran. The Injeel is like the conspiracy theorists holy grail......
Listen weasel obviously you have a problem with lying. Otherwise you wouldn't assume or accuse everyone else of lying. Make an argument! Make an argument what did he lie about. And where is the proof that he lied. Otherwise shut up
![[Live] : ONE 169 วันนี้!! "อนาโตลี vs อูมาร์"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IK3YZVWuFJg/mqdefault.jpg)
@ 13:00 hamza quoting the Qoran the same as " the need for creed"
Very powerfull
2:28, 5:25, 9:45,
11:48 (a), 12:14, 13:53,
Injeel, jesus 14:45, 15:30 (c), 16:04
Manuscruot 23:35
Very informative ❤
Simply great stuff...
جزاكم الله خيرا
قال رسول الله ﷺ : " أحب الكَلام إلى الله أربع: سبحان الله، والحمْد لله، ولا إله إلّا الله، والله أكبر، لا يضرّك بأيهن بدأت."
وقال تعالى﴿ فَاذكُرُونِي أَذْكُرْكُم و اشْكُرُوا لِي وَلَا تَكْفُرُونِ ﴾
Subhana Allah -Glory be to God
Alhamdulilah -Praise be to God
La ilaha il'Allah-there is no god but God
Allahu Akbar-God is the Greatest
☝️✅
ماشاءاللہ
nice, thank you guys, may Allah forgive us.
Answering the title. NO THEY NEVER GET ANYTHING.
What is the Injeel and who wrote it. For 1400 years no Muslim can answer these simple questions.
@@sammylong3704 The book given to Jesus by God. I don’t know what ‘Muslims’ you were talking to
@@sammylong3704why u assuming that the injeel was a book written down? The injeel is the revelation revelead by God unto Jesus and is the revelation that Jesus taught and preached and practiced its not harder than that
Alhamdulillah for Islam. everything makes sense
@Hamza's Den:---Notice how Zakir Hussein talks about (Q)---Souce. Like anyone has ever laid their hands on such "source". The correct position is that (Q)--Source never existed. It is a hypothetical construct as an Aid to scholastic research and propositions.
The Injeel or Gospel is about the kingdom of God and not about Jesus. Christians got the wrong book.
The God of Abraham in the Quran condemns the trinity and that God has taken a son. Obviously God didn’t mean christian scriptures as it stand today.
When did the new testemant start and when did Old Testament start and finish?
لا اله إلا الله محمد رسول الله
orangutan vs bonobo vs chimpanzee
talking to this guy like talking to a Christian AI...
Ok Hamza if we don't need a testament of Jesus life and ministry, if we got it all wrong. Can you tell us what the good news is please ?
Read the Quran.
What is the testimony of Jesus, whether these are his statements in red letters in the Bible or people have changed them, we can only judge if we look at the Quran.
_Can you tell us what the good news is please?_
The revelation given to Jesus.
Do you have it?
Quran alone is the way.
Ask the Vatican
Were is the injeel they have it .
Why keep asking the Muslim who never made the claim on the existence of the injeel it was the lord of the heavens.
Asking a Muslim were is the injeel to make it look like, you have an amazing point 😂
You don't have nothing but to gaslight a Muslim to answer something what only Allah the lord of the heavens can answer.
The Vatican did purchase an Aramiac 4th century Gospel of Barnabas in 2010 that found in Turkey for $50 million. So I personally believe the Vatican library has the Injeel locked in its vault..Catholic church is hiding it...
Hamzah really what's the proplem on eathiast
Huh
salaam
in this life you’re either intelligent or christian may Allah facilitate the understanding
Jesus turned the water into wine John 2 1-11
And Allah turned disbelievers into apes and swine (S. 5.60). What's your point?
Let’s take the Gospel of John, the fourth Gospel. Is there good evidence to believe that
what we read in John’s Gospel is a true account of what Jesus actually said and did?
Up until a few hundred years ago, no-one really questioned whether John’s Gospel was historical. But
with growing scepticism over the reality of God and the supernatural (a philosophical and cultural
movement known as the Enlightenment), scholars began to suggest other explanations for the origins
of the Gospel. Against the traditional view of the Gospel having been written by a disciple of Jesus
and eyewitness to his life, death and resurrection, they argued that the Gospel was, in reality, written
by someone living hundreds of years later, and hundreds of miles away. And the concepts in John,
they said, were too Greek, and not Jewish enough (as the other three Gospels, Matthew, Mark and
Luke, were). John’s idea that Jesus was ‘God in the flesh’, for example, was said to reflect much later
developments in Christian theology. So for these reasons, by around 1900, most New Testament
scholars believed that John’s Gospel could not be considered as reliable history.
The Catholic Encyclopedia, II, page 263:
“The baptismal formula was changed from the name of Jesus Christ to the words Father, Son, and Holy Spirit by the Catholic Church in the second century.”
Edmund Schlink, The Doctrine of Baptism, page 28:
“The baptismal command in its Matthew 28:19 form can not be the historical origin of Christian baptism. At the very least, it must be assumed that the text has been transmitted in a form expanded by the [Catholic] church.
wake up! they had to add the trinity later
Many Christians use this verse to prove the existence of the Trinity. For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. (1 John 5:7) The issue with this verse is that it is universally recognized by Biblical scholars and historians, including thirty-two Christian scholars of the highest eminence backed by fifty cooperating Christian denominations, as being inserted by the Church later. Since it was proven that this verse is a fabrication, it has been deleted from some of the later Bibles, such as the Revised Standard Version and the New Revised Standard Version...,,.,
Ttthe doctrine of Alpha and Omega is a sad and unfortunate example of mankind’s tampering with the Word of God. It shows how doctrine is contracted by men to justify false beliefs. The phrase “Saying, I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last” (Revelation 1:11) which is found in the King James Version was not in the original Greek texts. Therefore, the Alpha Omega phrase is not found in virtually any ancient texts, nor is it mentioned, even as a footnote, in any modern translation.,
This phrase does NOT occur in NA28, UBS5, W&H, Souter, Majority Text, THGNT, SBL, R&P Byzantine Text, Orthodox Text, Jerome's Latin Vulgate, & the Clementine Text. The phrase only occurs in the Textus Receptus.
This phrase is not even footnoted in UBS5 and UBS4. The only MSS listed as having this phrase in NA28 is the manuscript of the commentary on Revelation by Andreas of Caesarea. However, "I [am] the first and the last" occurs in P025.
Therefore, there appears to be very little dispute that "I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last" is not part of the original text of Revelation at Rev 1:11.
in many places, the trinitaria scribes mistraslate. e.g. they translate words that mean 'revere' or 'homage' into worship. this is truly sad that they mislead many to eternal fiya
Matthew 2:11 - The NRSV correctly reads “and they knelt down and paid him homage.” The NIV has the magi worship Jesus instead of merely paying homage, most likely reflecting the piety of the translators and their audience: “and they bowed down and worshipped him.” The NIV does, however, correctly translate the same word (proskuneō) as “pay homage” in Mark 15:19, where the soldiers pay mock homage to Jesus as king. [See BeDuhn, Truth in Translation, pp. 44-45.]
John 7:53-8:11, often described as “The Passage of the Woman Caught in Adultery” (passage de adultera), is famous for several reasons. The pleasant reason is that it is one of the most dramatic displays of the grace of God in the Bible. But there is also a more difficult reason that needs to be addressed: this passage was likely not in the original version of the Gospel of John, but was added later at an undeterminable time and for an unknown reason. How should the church treat this passage?
The text-critical evidence is overwhelming: this passage was almost certainly not in the original version of the Gospel of John. This is hardly an answer, however, but an entirely new question. For nearly every contemporary Bible, even if the text is given double-brackets or italicized or given a smaller font, contains this passage, thereby declaring to today’s reader that it is part of the Gospel of John
Bruce Metzger, the premier New Testament textual critic, writes:
“Matthew and Luke suppress or weaken references in Mark to such human emotions of Jesus as grief and anger and amazement as well as Jesus’ unrequited love; they also omit Mark’s statement that Jesus’ friends thought he was beside himself”.
He explains further, that:
“The later gospels omit what might imply that Jesus was unable to accomplish what he willed…and also omit questions asked by Jesus which might be taken to imply his ignorance.”[3]
Metzger continues further by enumerating instances where Matthew and Luke soften Mark’s statements which might minimize the majesty of Jesus and replaced it with illustrations of a more alluring and authoritative Jesus.
In the story of the fig tree as found in Mark, the disciples did not notice the withering of the tree until next morning. For Matthew, this seemed less dramatic and unimpressive, and hence in his narrative the tree withered at once, leaving the disciples in shock and amazement.
Matthew and Luke were adamant in changing the words of Jesus. They wanted to make Jesus say what they wanted people to believe, “reflecting a later stage of theological understanding than that in Mark.” (Metzger, pg 83)
It seems quite clear that during both the pre and post gospel stages of the gospel traditions transmission, the available material was molded, filtered and changed in direct correlation to the Christological convictions of those who handled the traditions.
It is important to stress that this is not a case of the evangelists’ mere differing in emphasis; rather there are numerous occasions when the later gospel writers go out of their way to modify and alter the earlier version.
Therefore, if we wish to come close to the historical Jesus in the gospels, it is a good starting point to compare the stories in the various gospels, to discern where the story has altered.
The injeel was a pamphlet that got misplaced
Bruce Metzger, the premier New Testament textual critic, writes:
“Matthew and Luke suppress or weaken references in Mark to such human emotions of Jesus as grief and anger and amazement as well as Jesus’ unrequited love; they also omit Mark’s statement that Jesus’ friends thought he was beside himself”.
He explains further, that:
“The later gospels omit what might imply that Jesus was unable to accomplish what he willed…and also omit questions asked by Jesus which might be taken to imply his ignorance.”[3]
Metzger continues further by enumerating instances where Matthew and Luke soften Mark’s statements which might minimize the majesty of Jesus and replaced it with illustrations of a more alluring and authoritative Jesus.
In the story of the fig tree as found in Mark, the disciples did not notice the withering of the tree until next morning. For Matthew, this seemed less dramatic and unimpressive, and hence in his narrative the tree withered at once, leaving the disciples in shock and amazement.
Matthew and Luke were adamant in changing the words of Jesus. They wanted to make Jesus say what they wanted people to believe, “reflecting a later stage of theological understanding than that in Mark.” (Metzger, pg 83)
It seems quite clear that during both the pre and post gospel stages of the gospel traditions transmission, the available material was molded, filtered and changed in direct correlation to the Christological convictions of those who handled the traditions.
It is important to stress that this is not a case of the evangelists’ mere differing in emphasis; rather there are numerous occasions when the later gospel writers go out of their way to modify and alter the earlier version.
Therefore, if we wish to come close to the historical Jesus in the gospels, it is a good starting point to compare the stories in the various gospels, to discern where the story has altered.
Many Christians use this verse to prove the existence of the Trinity. For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. (1 John 5:7) The issue with this verse is that it is universally recognized by Biblical scholars and historians, including thirty-two Christian scholars of the highest eminence backed by fifty cooperating Christian denominations, as being inserted by the Church later. Since it was proven that this verse is a fabrication, it has been deleted from some of the later Bibles, such as the Revised Standard Version and the New Revised Standard Version.
What about “He who is without s77n, should k4st the f1r5t”?
On the other hand, every other early manuscript omits it, notably including two of the earliest and most reliable manuscripts, called Papyrus 66 and Papyrus 75 that date from the second or early third century and were found in Egypt (closer to where John wrote). Codex Sinaiticus, the oldest complete copy of the New Testament (c. 325 CE), does not include it either. No pastor or theologian from the eastern side of the early church references it until the tenth century. In their commentaries and sermons, they go directly from John 7:52 to 8:12 (keep in mind that current chapter and verse breakdowns were added later). Finally, all the earliest translations of the Greek New Testament (Syriac, Coptic, Armenian, Old Latin, and Georgian) skip this story as well.
My question to the Muslims... In your opinion, what was the purpose of Allah revealing the Injil to Jesus when the Injil couldn't even outlast the letters of Paul? The Injil has to have the shortest shelf life out of all the revelations Muslims believe Allah revealed.
Jesus was sent not but to the lost sheep of house of Israel. not up to us to preserve it. go ask christians what they did with eveangelion (Injeel, the Gospel Jesus was preaching not Mark, Luke, John, Mathew nobody's biographies). since they corrupted their scripture. God sent another to preserve the teachings in Quran.Quran is preserved with radio carbon dated menu scripts in original language and memorized from cover to cover.
@@Noble_One Your response didn't answer the question I asked. Any other Muslim giving this guy a thumbs up for his useless comment want to give an answer?
@@dawahproof3030 he did answer the question. In summary, Injeel was meant for specific group and time, that's the purpose.
the injeel was a revelation that was revealed to jesus
the purpose of that revelation is to guide the isrealites at the time of jesus
the isrealites at that time are the ones who meant to preserve that revelation but rather they throw it away or sell it or even destored it just like it's mentioned in the quran
same thing goes with the torah that was revealed to moses
so they not only failed when it comes to one revelation but also with another revelation
hope you get the message
@@areshensem My question is specifically about the span of time that the Injil was relevant. Almost 2000 years have passed since Jesus preached his message, and according to Muslims, there is no trace of the Injil that the Qur'an mentions outside of the Qur'an itself, yet Paul's letters, which were written during the same period as the Injil, were copied and are preserved to the present day. So what was the purpose of Allah revealing the Injil to Jesus when the Injil couldn't even outlast the letters of Paul?
V
My message to every Muslim, my brother or sister, the owner of the channel, I know that I do not have the right to comment on your channel, but as God bears witness, our circumstances are harsh and you forced me to do this, something. Please forgive me. I honor you because you are men. We are women. You cannot go out or work like you, my brother. Where is the brotherhood of faith in your hearts? We are women. Brotherhood. There is no mercy, no compassion, no humanity. Giving good news to the patient is the greatest hope of waiting for what we want.'''''''''''''''' ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' how much. I called, how many words I spoke, and how hard we are, but there is no life to whom you call. Brother, we are with us. My mother orders us food from the restaurant. Zawidah and today. My mother went. She was crying. She said why is Yami crying? You said, my daughter. I'm asking. God is mine. He consoles me with death. She said it. why. Yami. You claim against us. She said: My daughter, today is a friend. The restaurant. Why? The most beautiful people in terms of people. I ask God, my daughter. God is gathering me. Death alone is a better insect. Who is this foolish and this insignificant? True, true. I am saying this. It diminishes my value and my respect. But, brother. I swear to God that I did not say this, kiss your boots. I was so hungry that my conscience no longer allowed me to let her go and ask us for food. I kiss your boots, brother, and I ask you by God Almighty and in the Book of God, brother, I kiss your boots, brother. We have nothing to do with it, brother. Even a thousand Yemeni riyals. We can buy us a kilo of minutes. 00967717018744. Have mercy on him. He who is in the show will have mercy on you. He who is in heaven will have mercy on you. Brother. This is my number. The one who can help us. Message me on WhatsApp. We will send it. The full name will transfer us as much as he can. May God reward you well. God knows that the owner of the house takes us out in the street in the rain because of... Please see my condition for yourselves, I ask you by God, the Ever-Living, the Ever-Subsisting, to help me, and God is the Great, even at night we cannot sleep from fear. We have neither mattresses nor blankets to keep us warm from the cold. Everything has been drowned by the rain, and we have no one but God. Then you, my brothers, kiss your boots. Do not let me be disappointed. Help us as much as you can. So, do you please us that we live in this place? We are girls and we have no one. Our father died in a car accident. Consider us your daughters and offer and help me as much as you can. May God reward you well =>[[}>] ^][°] €] €] €] €...' ',,,,,,,,;-'-"!;'(')"\|\(/()\|¶€(/)'|\€\>|\≧≫;;/:; -/;;!;?;"????✓]}>>]}]}]\>]}>×}✓\🎉🎉😢😢!;";!":!!:!😢🎉::!!:"::😢🎉..,.,.,.,..
scammer
You know that Muslims look for proof in people's claims because of their experience throughout history, so if you are honest, make a live stream and show who you are and what kind of situation you are in, otherwise....
Muslims and Christians share the same God.. Argue over the details.
No thats not true😂😂😂
@@IboGetsuu well actually yes
that's actually true (whether you like it or not)
Should we remind you what's the Aramaic word the Jesus used for god almighty ???
Not true.
It is true there is only one true God.
Christins believe a man is God.
We don't.
@@ryder-m5r iknow Allaha. But the stupid Christians believe in 3Gods and they believe that Jesus is God astachfuallah! So Dont talk with me, ik what i'm talking about!!!
Well no in the sense that we dont worship Jesus but yes as in there is only 1 God so if a Christian worships and a Muslim worships its directed to the one God. Where that God accepts the Christians or Muslims worship is a seperate detail
Nobody has ever asked me about the Injeel whipe doing dawah. Nobody can definitively tell me what it is because nobody knows. It's simpler to stick to the Quran. The Injeel is like the conspiracy theorists holy grail......
The Injil is also like the great wall of Dhul Qarnayn which is mentioned in Surah Al-Kahf. Neither of them ever existed.
I wonder if Hamza is declaring this income plus his shop work to the Inland Revenue?
Hamza lives rent free in your mind lol
what do you care? you on welfare anyway.
I'm sure he is but it's none of your damn business
Hamza doesn't Lie, he just changes his opinion when caught being untruthful
Where do we go when we die?
Listen weasel obviously you have a problem with lying. Otherwise you wouldn't assume or accuse everyone else of lying. Make an argument! Make an argument what did he lie about. And where is the proof that he lied. Otherwise shut up
And I'm sure you have a book full of evidence which for some reason you won't ever share with anyone.
@@hhyhnh9335 There is a video on TH-cam of him doing exactly that, not a book true just video evidence.
@@hhyhnh9335 Also everyone is allowed to be ugly, he just abuses the privilage.
جزاكم الله خيرا