Some have pointed out that the X1DII has a eshutter capable of 1/10000. This is true as of a firmware update, but it was not true at the time I completed my evaluation here.
I went with the 50R about a year ago - the X1D not having a shutter was a deal breaker for me. I shoot almost primarily old, adapted lenses, so I needed a body that could use those to the best ability. I don't want to have to deal with the negative effects of an electronic shutter all the time.
Love my X1D ii, 3 lenses in I am heads over heels about it. People's minds explode when they see me in the wild with a Hasselblad. I love the range I can get with it, just the gradation I can capture with it and the wrapping of light around the subject its so awesome. Any equipment that inspires you to shoot is the one for you. It's different for everyone. For me its the Hasselblad.
@@rosetta-stxned still nothing u cant do in post with RGB curve to color match and u make a quick preset of the curve adjustment if u want it to look like a hasselblad so bad. besides youre gonna change HSL in post anyways since its gonna be shot in raw. different glass not a big deal unless u like pixel peeping 100% crops
@@szmulek different glass is a huge deal for rendition, flaring, sharpness , and contrast. There is a difference in images, even if it’s not huge. That being said, it’s not worth the extra money IMO
For me (having also a GFX 100), the main reasons I keep going back to my X1d ii are: 1) above all, its color. like you said, colors are just stunning. Skin tones are amazing, its just gorgeous. And that just saves tons of post processing workflow etc... Nothing beats it hands down. 2) the portability. Nothing beats that either 3) optics quality. 80mm 1.9, 30mm 3.5 are enough reason to get a x1D to shoot with them. Nothing compared today. Fuji is coming with a 30 and 80 as well but not as compact. So far nothing on the market that matches it. 4) Like Leica, the camera doesnt get in the way. My GFX 100 is great but man, so many options, menus, etc... too many choices, decision making...... All that gets int the way of shooting IMO.... And again SOOC colors being so awesome reduces the post processing and also doesnt get in the way. You dont have to think how you will edit etc...
Also, keep in mind the xcd lenses are much better than any lens Hasselblad produced before. Even the H. By miles. Believe it or not the AF on the X1 is still better when you come from H lol.... so personally I think the X system has a great future. If you shoot H6D, the X1D feels like a treat and it’s easy to integrate to your workflow. HB color is consistent across all their digital cameras. So now you have a much more portable HB for some location travel etc. I don’t think they suddenly decided to go after a whole new market with that system.
I am sold on the hasselblad system myself after a VERY long period where the H2 was my last camera I purchased. I still used my 500's shooting film but I am back with 2 XCD lenses, an X1D, and my favorite at the moment the 907x and CFV ii which I use regularly with the XCD 45P and on my 500 series cameras which is a fantastic shooting experience for all of the work I personally like to do.
I a gree and from my POV although comparable, the FUJI cannot compete with Hasselblad. You said it perfectly in "1)" the colors: The X1D (II) or X2D delivers these perfect neutral, yet sharp and authentic images. Color, shadow & highlights in perfect harmony. Fuji technically completely up to date, doesn't seem to be the right tool in a commercial setting. Like Leica, these two are either wedding photographer tools or someone who does reportage. The Hasselblad is the commercial B2B Camera.
About the X1D on/off button This button has two functions cold and hot start/stop When turning on the camera that is completely shut down you have to make a long button press (a short press will not start the camera) the action is confirmed by the led lighting up at the back of the camera. Same to shut the camera completely down, one long button press. When you are in a shooting pause, you just make a short button press and the camera goes to sleep mode with almost no power consumption, when you want to take a frame you just make a short on button or release button press and the camera awakes without any lag. If you want to have full control of this function, best is to deactivate the auto sleep mode in the menu.
X1D camera control with buttons is most about first press, then choose with one of the wheels. values selection is shown on the rear screen or in the EVF when you scroll with the wheel Somme buttons ave double functions, with sort press and long press. This control method appeared to my too, weird and messy the first times I had the camera in the hands. After some weeks of use it appeared very confortable : few buttons that you can find immediately without searching or showing at them, while having the eye on the viewfinder. I too have cameras with a lot of dedicated buttons everywhere and the problem for me is to find the right button on the right place while having the eye on the viewfinder. For more complicated menu camera configurations you simply store them in the C1, C2, C3 memories that you select with the big round upper knob.
Here in Norway you can purchase one GFX and GF45mm GF110mm for the same price as the Hasselblad alone. And if you take one Hassy lens with the Hassy, you can take two more GF lenses, in total 4 lenses and a camera, for the same price as the Hassy and one lens...
@@trondhelgehie6771 Oh okay, then it must be even worse than my X1d ii outside the Studio :D I only use Canon RF and Leica for on Location etc. hence speed is important to get the shot.
The hassy looks like something that belongs in the studio only. Whereas with the fuji, I'd still feel comfortable hitting the street with it. Also unrelated, I commented a few weeks back about moving from Sony to fuji. You along with a few other fuji TH-camrs really helped me decide on a camera and lens. Very Happy owner of an xt-3 and a 35 f/2. And happily done with Sony. Thank you for the great information that helped me find a camera Im excited to use. Fuji really is different.
Hi Bhurnal...I also moved from Sony to Fuji, started with the XT-2 and now I have the 50R, of course Andrew help me out decided with his videos and knowledge about the Fuji system.
@@Eduardo_Aguirre Funny, I'm also strongly contemplating making the same move myself. Coming from an A6300 and having an impossible time deciding between the right XT-X or X-Pro X model. Really *really* want a rangefinder, but really want all of the features that come with the XT-X models... choices!
The best feeling...is knowing that you are fortunate. Being Thankful these days is a rare blessing. Savor it. :) I am thankful that I got my Fuji GS645S working again. I love it more than my digital gear. Great video.
So why on earth would anyone obliterate the background in the original. Takes a minute to re-arrange the background in photoshop. Bokeh will be seen as gimmickry in future,
About the lack of flipscreen on the X1D. You can see the liveview image and press the shutter on your iPhone/iPad with the Phocus Mobile application that connects automatically to the camera when turned on.
1:34, yes, they do offer better cropping options, but don't forget, they also offer better NOT cropping options for many who never output to 3:2. If you do mostly 4:3, or even 1:1, you actually use all/more of those pixels you paid for.
Thanks for doing this video. I have, like you, been full format curious for some time. :) I did evaluate the Fujifilm 50r with one of the f2.8 lenses and did absolutely love it. I enjoy shooting Fujifilm and Leica for pleasure but I typically use Sony for my full frame portrait, landscape, etc serious projects. Context aside, instead of buying a Fujifilm 50r and appropriate starter glass, I opted to upgrade my Sony to A7riv && and a Sony 135mm f1.8 for roughly the same coin. While I feel I would have enjoyed the 50r more, I still have my XPro3 and Leica lenses to mess around with. In the end, the Sony 60mp and absolutely beautiful 135mm solves 90% of my higher res needs. I await the day the Fujifilm GFX 100 goes on sale along with some of those lenses.
Thanks man! I appreciate the video. I have a feeling Fujifilm will continue to heavily invest in the GFX system. The video functionality of the GFX100 for instance is remarkable. If that trickles down to the more compact GFX’es... and dare I hope, an even more compact GFX model at some point? Would be gold.
As a Sony a9 shooter and Fuji xt’s and 100 I find Fuji for its price point someone comes near the hassy look but I’ve seen real large prints from all those and canons and specifically for portraiture the Hassy just has a magic look that has put it on my bucket list to own in the near future..great review btw mate👍
I use a Smallrig halfcase with the GFX 50r and it solves the grip issue perfectly and allows for easy use with a tripod in both portrait and landscape orientation. I am intrigued by Hasselblad’s colour science though and very much like the quest for in-camera perfection of colours and tonality. For the Fuji system, I am very much looking forward to the 80mm 1.7. I think that will be the perfect combo with the GFX50r. Looking forward to your in-depth videos on the Hasselblad lenses!
My thing about ISO is: auto works. If you want to adjust the depth of field then you change the aperture. If you want to change the motion blur, adjust the shutter. ISO is just a compensation for the other two. With new cameras you can set a limit on auto iso. So I know my camera doesn't look good above 6400, so I set a limit on 6400 and leave it on auto. Why would you need to adjust it?
My favorite camera is the Hasselblad XPan. Nothing compares to it. I liked the DP0 (21:9) Quattro by Sigma, but prefer the older DP Merrell series for the Foveon Sensor. The Foveon on the Quattros is not the same.. Unfortunately, they do not make a 21:9 version for the Merrell, just have to crop it like that in Photoshop. Prefer the Fuji X series much more over Hassie these days.
Glad to see you back! I love the idea of owning a Hasselblad - because Hasselblad(!)... That being said, I have already decided, I won't buy any more cameras until I have saved up for a high end 35mm rangefinder. I guess medium format digital cameras for me, are to photography, what Formula 1 race cars are to cars in general (said the cyclist). Anyway, thank you for another very interesting video.
Hmm I think Fuji GFX has more affordable lenses so makes a lot differences when you buy into „fuller“ frame. But I would fancy a digital back on my Hasselblad 500cm. And use old Zeiss lenses 😍 proper medium.
I get that. I love the look I get with Portra 160 and my 500cm. It’s unrivalled in the overall look and the flextight scans are beautiful. Alt least in my taste. I hope Hasselblad is going further into their heritage. First step is the 907x. In the end an XCD-Camera like the X1d, but with the possibility to use it as a v-System digital back. I tried it and I was amazed. There is some mojo about Hasselblad which they seemed to have lost for a while. The only reason I won’t buy one is the price tag and the sensor size. Hope they‘ll do a 907hv where they use the larger sensor of the h6d. Or even a square one matching the 6x6 format. I don’t even care about megapixels. Everything above 50MP is enough for my taste. I just want the sensor size combined with the pixel-quality of low pixel density sensors. A 6x6 907x equivalent, where you can use HCD lenses stand alone and the v-System lenses with my 500cm would be my dream system.
Just as a side-note. The flash-sync is not really that important. Modern studio strobes have either the ability to use HSS or - just as important - they have a very short flash duration, so you freeze movement anyway. Outside it's a different matter but you can still use HSS. The problem with LS lenses is that they require regular maintenance and that's very expensive, much more expensive than a camera service for the 50R/50S.
HSS is not at all the same in terms of power. Different needs for different jobs and if you depend on lighting control on location a leaf shutter and 1/2000s even 1/500s sync is the difference between needing 500w/s 1000w/s 2000w/s 4000w/s etc... HSS makes your 500w/s strobe more like a speedlight in terms of power which limits distance, modifiers, etc, etc, etc... HUGE difference. Thank goodness there's actually a choice which will not be the same for everyone.
Thank you for the in-depth awesome review ! I had both camera as well, and I have to say I got the 50r after seeing your video and I find much much deeper connection with the 50R it is honestly one of the best camera that I have ever used, it just makes you want to shoot , and the image quality is simply stunning ! 50R is simply amazing ! I can't believe I have been missing out on the FUJI world for so long, selling ALL my other cameras and switching to Strictly FUJIs and Ricoh GRIII !
Thanks for sharing your experience and shots. It feels like Fuji has spent more time trying to understand their end users and Hasselblad has let visual design come before function... Both are amazing though, but I'd probably go for a 50r as a step up from my X-T2.
Nice comparison of these 2 systems, Andrew! In your opinion, if you were a 100% stills only, landscape, and small product photographer, which system do you think would work best, including evaluating lens sharpness and detail rendition, assuming one shoots 100% tripod-mounted, and 10 second self timer for optimum sharpness? Thank you!
Three quick comments. 1. The first thing I thought as I hit play was "Can these be cropped to emulate the X-Pan look that Andrew loves? Apparently, Yes. 2. Hasselblad putting the shutter in the lens seems wasteful. You would be re-buying an expensive component with each lens. I don't understand that. 3. If Fujifilm could get a GFX sensor in something closer to an X100 series format (including leaf shutter!) it would be game over.
1. Yes! 2. Leaf shutters are extremely popular in the studio. 3. Oh man. I would sell plasma on a daily basis to be able to buy an X100V with a GFX size sensor. :)
The advantages of leaf shutter against focal plane shutter are: Full flash sync for all shutter speeds up to 1/2000s, no necessity of HSS or HS flash sync that looses a lot of power, this is a big advantage for outdoor flash in bright sunlight and big apertures. Much lower shutter vibrations than focal plane curtains, because modern leaf shutters have 4 tiny carbon leaves, in each leaf pair the vibrations of one leaf is subtracted from the vibrations of the opposite leaf.
Having used both these cameras, although rented!. Just one thing that totally makes X1D II worth it over Fuji 50R/S. 16Bit RAW! The colours are out of this world and with right post processing techniques the 16Bit RAW files truly shine. The kind of highlight gradation it holds is truly astounding. 16Bit alone is worth the premium, the next MF camera price wise that shoots 16Bit is Fuji GFX 100, and that's roughly 10k.
Although X1D2 is 14bit upsampling to 16bit. The colour output from X1D2 really amazing. I love the advantage of its lens leaf shutter that enable high speed flash sync to 1/2000 that I can shoot with fill flash in daylight (Nikon compatible flash). Long time exposure can be insanely up to 68 minutes. Most other cameras cannot do that. I have the camera so I know.
Even though these systems are great, I've been looking at older medium format cameras. Yes, the tech is a lot older but the resolution, depth and color, I think is still there. I saw a Leica S2 (37mp) with a 70mm 2.8 Leica lens with two batteries and CF card for $2800. I couldn't believe my eyes. Should have purchased it. My loss. Even some older digital Mamiya 645s, and Hasselblads are priced under $3000 with a lens and other accessories. You just have to continually be on the hunt on eBay to find these great deals. Nice vid as usual.
Thanks Andrew. I’ve been hoping for this vid ever since I noticed the tags on your Instagram photos recently! Great stuff. That Hasselblad design has so much potential.
I absolutely agree with your experience on the Gfx 50R. As much as I would love to keep it, comming from X-Pro2 this was a big quality downgrade at the time as I bought the GFX. It feels horrible in the hands, and that carry over buttons and joystick from the XT line apear tiny on this camera. Also the thick sticking out frame around the screen was a disapointment for me. If Fuji gives this system as much love as they do for the X-Pro line, then I would invest in it again!!!
This was great. Thanks! And, for what it’s worth, I agree with you on the 3 dial thing. In fact, I’ve been dreaming of 4 dedicated dials; one each for shutter, aperature, iso, and white balance. First world problems, I know, but I hate fiddling to find secondary buttons for adjusting iso and WB. One can only dream! Cheers.
Glad you are back. Sweet emotions is why most of us shoot, so keep it up. I am still working on getting the most of my S1r, so I am not ready for the full frame. Cool leather case, I miss them in modern cameras.
the reason hassy lenses are so expensive is they have leaf shutter mechanism good for high speed flash sync. fuji don't i have the gfx 50r and some gf lenses sync speed 250sec blaaah
Good video. But I get the feeling there is a variable missing in that equation. With the same sensor there is also the Pentax 645Z. It's a bulkier camera but a real tool and fun to work with because of the grip and the OVF.
The Pentax is also a true medium format camera, which neither the Hassy nor the GFX aspire to, if "only" a 645. It is, however, twice the weight of the X1D II (1550 gr vs 770 gr). The price drop to $5000 helps, though.
@@leonardnorwitz3537 Mirrorless is in today. It makes sense for cameras to become significantly lighter and smaller, at least for me. Sometimes, however, I get the impression that this is quickly compensated for by the size and weight of modern lenses. Everyone must determine for themselves the essential factors to make the decision on which camera it should be. The OVF and the handling, the grip of the Pentax were decisive for me in direct comparison to the Fuji. And there are plenty of very good and inexpensive used lenses for the Pentax on the market.
2:51 fyi Panasonic S-series also have 65:24 ;) And the Sigma fp has some truly funky inline aspects like "√2:1" (Golden Ratio, I think?), 7:6 + 7:3 Bless you :)
Great review. Totally agree with on the OOC colors of the X1Dii. Best colors from any camera, I struggle to move one slider in LR. I ended up selling it though, couldn’t live with the lead shutter and terrible electronic one that not only creates banding, but terrible jello effect. Keep up the good work.
I used MK1 version of Hassie before Fujifilm. Did Hasselblad finished the product ? I did not notice last time when I had mk2 for a few day's. For designer seems to be more important that the one must stare in to Hasselblad logo for 5 seconds then to take photo of the momentum. It might be nice camera and system for someone who does not shoot photos.
I've owned both and just could never like the 50R... I respected it but never liked shooting with it. It felt huge, clumsy and not at all streamlined from the 50S to call it a travel camera like some do. The X1D2 is more expensive but I would rather pay the money and be happy. If the Fuji Omega comes out I would consider that for studio work but for now Fuji remains my ultralight travel gear (XE3) and the X1D2 is my everyday home gear and no compromise gear that I will pack if the trip is worth it.
I think the Hasselblad is a much higher build quality, it’s menus system is industry leading and very similar to Leica. The Hasselblad lenses are far far superior and leaf shutters always out perform focal plane shutters, the processor produces better colors and together they produce far superior images. Fuji build is fair, interface is fair, lenses are at bottom for MF systems, while cheaper than Leica S or Hasselblad lenses they bring up the rear. If image quality is the goal with MF, Fuji may not punch that ticket with those lenses.
What are your thoughts on the Leica Q2? I know its a fixed lens but its 45MP and sorta pushes in the medium format range without being there.... and its a Leica. Would love to see you review that and get your thoughts.
@Prashanth Panicker I don't want to be that "guy" but are you really comparing Fuji to Leica in quality? I have had a number of Fuji cameras myself for years and I don't even think this is a real conversation to be had... Just being honest. I'll say that most people that have an issue with Leica (I've found) are the ones that either can't afford to buy them and are very stern on having multiple lenses (in their price range). Additionally, in the case of the Q2 most have issue with the fixed lens... and I see that as a limitation on many of the reviews and photographers imagination. In short, from a current fuji user, Hasselblad and Leica do belong in the same conversation (in my opinion) but Fuji doesn't have a seat at that table. Just my opinion.
@@rodsilva80 what's your current kit? and/or are you just responding with specs from different manufacturers? Do you have both the Sony A7R4 and the GFX50R?
My fix for this crave of the medium format look: Lumix S5ii + Voigtlander Nokton 40mm f1.2 VM aspherical. The lens is tiny, with the leica M to L mount adapter which is also tiny it provides a very compact and good looking setup. @AndrewGoodCamera you should give it a shot, it really produces awesome photos and lots of people told me it feels like medium format :)
If you take some time to study how the X1D works you will find that you can change focus point with the dials. You can also reprogram buttons to what you want.
Oui, tu as raison sur la partie ergonomique. Mais Hasselblad offre d’incroyables résultats photographiques, ce n’est pas le cas de Fuji dont les résultats ne sont pas la hauteur de la taille du capteur !
Enjoy your video and I plan on getting the GFX50R. I also have a Pentax 6 x 7 system and I’m very curious if I can use the 6 x 7 lenses with the DFX 50R and if so with what adapter?
When deciding on the Hass speed shouldn’t be your consideration because it’ll just leave you frustrated. Having said that the X1D II is far from slow, it takes a couple seconds to load up when first switched on but that’s not an issue for me. It’s a thing of beauty. Oh and re the lcd screen being unresponsive .. mine is super responsive so I’m not sure why you had that issue. The Fuji is just fugly and it’s a reason I dumped my Sony alpha’s, Sony glass is phenomenal but their bodies lack imagination. The colour science on the Hass too, magical pics all the time.
When you shoot in 24x65 mode in the Hasselblad, do you see this aspect ratio in the viewfinder and in the display too? Second question... are the images already cropped in this proportions when you import them in the software for post processing or do you need to crop them again?
Yes. It is a built-in aspect ratio option. If you shoot in JPG, it will come out cropped. If you shoot in RAW, depending on your RAW editor, it will crop to the 24:65 by default, but you can still uncrop it to the full resolution.
I compared these cameras and bought Hasselblad. Hasselblad is slower but the quality of the images are considerable. The colors are more natural and has a huge advantage if you have to convert them to CMYK, especially in a color managed workflow. I love the leaf shutter also as I used to use flash outdoor also. Adapting lenses: Cambo has a special Canon/XCD adapter. I used it with Canon TS24 lens and it gave me better results than with the Canon 5DsR. Another breathtaking experience came with the Otus 85…
It would be awesome if you could make a video about those Mamiya 645 lenses on the Fuji GFX system, I just got the 80mm f1.9 for the GFX50r, can't wait
Great comparison and insight! As a swede it's quite funny how you say "Hassel" in a Swedish accent(kinda) and then "blad" in an American accent, and after a few minutes you switch it up and do the opposite 😁
Im waiting on something like 45 P but one wider around 35 and one more tele around 65 then I'll burn cash for them. For the love of god the hassy is super sexy.
Always enjoy your videos. Let me ask you, couldn't a mirror-less camera be programmed through firmware to accept a leaf shutter? Essential it's just on off?
Hey Andrew --- any reason why the Pentax 645 wasn't included in this head-to-head?? (apologies if it was mentioned - I'm going to look at the video now but that was my immediate question after seeing the title - lol ).
Totally agree with your comment on ISO adjustment. But to go one step further. You should also be able to immediately see, in a mirrorless camera EVF, the changes ISO makes to the image. And however the camera indicates the under to over exposure should be live during ISO dial adjustment. Just like changing the shutter and aperture dials. And in my opinion even on a DSLR where you have to press a button to get to ISO adjustment, changing ISO should change the under to over exposure indicator live.
Love the channel and am thinking of selling my M6 and buying a GFX 50R. Is it well built? Says ‘magnesium body’ but can’t seem to find whether it has a metal chassis as per XPro3?
@@AndrewGoodCamera Thanks...it's helped me as I want a robust, well made camera that has longevity. Images look fantastic. By the way, keep doing what you're doing on youtube - your's is my favourite youtube channel - find it really informative and helpful. Stay safe,
I've been using the GFX50R with the 23mm and 32-64mm f4 for 18 months now. I am always amazed by the IQ (I shoot landscapes). I thought a while back that maybe it was too much camera for me and nearly sold it, but it was when I looked back at the images that I just couldn't part with it. I really wish they made a 16-35mm equivalent (so a 20-45) wide-angle zoom, then it'd be the perfect landscape camera - for me anyway.
I totally agree. I wasn't thinking the GFX IQ would be all that big a difference, but I'm addicted to the freedom the resolution provides and how gorgeous the micro contrast is.
@@AndrewGoodCamera for me it's the detail and the "look". the only camera I'v enjoyed as much IQ wise was / is a Nikon D700. Both cameras have that "something". Haed to pinpoint, just a well look I guess.
The fuji Xtrans is isolated only to the X series crop sensor bodies, and actually not all of the X series bodies. The GFX line uses a standard Bayer color array. Still, using both systems, the GFX 50R is way more versatile. I still ended up going with the X series Hasselblad because I had too much invested in the H series cameras. It was a logical move, but I really miss using the fuji for alternative lenses. Using the X1dII in electronic shutter mode is just not that great.
Excellent comparison! You gave me a lot of user insight, which I didn't know and as I am about to move to medium format, your video came as a ring to my finger :) Best wishes and regards from Uruguay. Suscribed!
Some have pointed out that the X1DII has a eshutter capable of 1/10000. This is true as of a firmware update, but it was not true at the time I completed my evaluation here.
Great video, wish I could afford one of these, so expensive. I hope to use one of these in the future some day for my career.
me looking at 5 grand cameras with a percent of that in the bank
We all are 😂
I went with the 50R about a year ago - the X1D not having a shutter was a deal breaker for me. I shoot almost primarily old, adapted lenses, so I needed a body that could use those to the best ability. I don't want to have to deal with the negative effects of an electronic shutter all the time.
I do that and consider getting GFX. How's manual focus assist? Eye aren't as good as they used to 😊
Love my X1D ii, 3 lenses in I am heads over heels about it. People's minds explode when they see me in the wild with a Hasselblad. I love the range I can get with it, just the gradation I can capture with it and the wrapping of light around the subject its so awesome. Any equipment that inspires you to shoot is the one for you. It's different for everyone. For me its the Hasselblad.
Yeah I also LOVE the way the X1D ii renders my desert wasteland. It's something special.
@@AndrewGoodCamera same sensor as gfx50 lol
@@szmulek glass + processor is different.
@@rosetta-stxned still nothing u cant do in post with RGB curve to color match and u make a quick preset of the curve adjustment if u want it to look like a hasselblad so bad. besides youre gonna change HSL in post anyways since its gonna be shot in raw. different glass not a big deal unless u like pixel peeping 100% crops
@@szmulek different glass is a huge deal for rendition, flaring, sharpness , and contrast. There is a difference in images, even if it’s not huge. That being said, it’s not worth the extra money IMO
Finally!!! A second video comparing the GFX with another medium format camera instead of a DSLR! I applaud you! Thank you!
For me (having also a GFX 100), the main reasons I keep going back to my X1d ii are:
1) above all, its color. like you said, colors are just stunning. Skin tones are amazing, its just gorgeous. And that just saves tons of post processing workflow etc... Nothing beats it hands down.
2) the portability. Nothing beats that either
3) optics quality. 80mm 1.9, 30mm 3.5 are enough reason to get a x1D to shoot with them. Nothing compared today. Fuji is coming with a 30 and 80 as well but not as compact. So far nothing on the market that matches it.
4) Like Leica, the camera doesnt get in the way. My GFX 100 is great but man, so many options, menus, etc... too many choices, decision making...... All that gets int the way of shooting IMO.... And again SOOC colors being so awesome reduces the post processing and also doesnt get in the way. You dont have to think how you will edit etc...
Really great points. Hasselblad is making it a harder decision than I would like it to be.
Also, keep in mind the xcd lenses are much better than any lens Hasselblad produced before. Even the H. By miles. Believe it or not the AF on the X1 is still better when you come from H lol.... so personally I think the X system has a great future. If you shoot H6D, the X1D feels like a treat and it’s easy to integrate to your workflow. HB color is consistent across all their digital cameras. So now you have a much more portable HB for some location travel etc. I don’t think they suddenly decided to go after a whole new market with that system.
I am sold on the hasselblad system myself after a VERY long period where the H2 was my last camera I purchased. I still used my 500's shooting film but I am back with 2 XCD lenses, an X1D, and my favorite at the moment the 907x and CFV ii which I use regularly with the XCD 45P and on my 500 series cameras which is a fantastic shooting experience for all of the work I personally like to do.
I a gree and from my POV although comparable, the FUJI cannot compete with Hasselblad. You said it perfectly in "1)" the colors: The X1D (II) or X2D delivers these perfect neutral, yet sharp and authentic images. Color, shadow & highlights in perfect harmony.
Fuji technically completely up to date, doesn't seem to be the right tool in a commercial setting. Like Leica, these two are either wedding photographer tools or someone who does reportage. The Hasselblad is the commercial B2B Camera.
About the X1D on/off button
This button has two functions cold and hot start/stop
When turning on the camera that is completely shut down you have to make a long button press (a short press will not start the camera) the action is confirmed by the led lighting up at the back of the camera. Same to shut the camera completely down, one long button press.
When you are in a shooting pause, you just make a short button press and the camera goes to sleep mode with almost no power consumption, when you want to take a frame you just make a short on button or release button press and the camera awakes without any lag.
If you want to have full control of this function, best is to deactivate the auto sleep mode in the menu.
Thanks for the note. I still wish it was a switch rather than button.
X1D camera control with buttons is most about first press, then choose with one of the wheels.
values selection is shown on the rear screen or in the EVF when you scroll with the wheel
Somme buttons ave double functions, with sort press and long press.
This control method appeared to my too, weird and messy the first times I had the camera in the hands.
After some weeks of use it appeared very confortable : few buttons that you can find immediately without searching or showing at them, while having the eye on the viewfinder.
I too have cameras with a lot of dedicated buttons everywhere and the problem for me is to find the right button on the right place while having the eye on the viewfinder.
For more complicated menu camera configurations you simply store them in the C1, C2, C3 memories that you select with the big round upper knob.
I have only tried them for a brief amount of time, but I far preferred the feeling of the Hasselblad.
Here in Norway you can purchase one GFX and GF45mm GF110mm for the same price as the Hasselblad alone. And if you take one Hassy lens with the Hassy, you can take two more GF lenses, in total 4 lenses and a camera, for the same price as the Hassy and one lens...
on the other hand people will call you a Fuji Shooter when you could be called a hasselblad photographer otherwise ;-)
DeKarle1992 And when I am using my Phase One IQ4 150, what are people calling me then? An excellent photographer 🙈😂
@@trondhelgehie6771 they won't call you anything cause you're stuck to the studio ^^
DeKarle1992 Dont have a studio, I am photographing in the nature, and on location 😂
But I see Hasselblad users are in studio all the time...
@@trondhelgehie6771 Oh okay, then it must be even worse than my X1d ii outside the Studio :D I only use Canon RF and Leica for on Location etc. hence speed is important to get the shot.
The hassy looks like something that belongs in the studio only. Whereas with the fuji, I'd still feel comfortable hitting the street with it.
Also unrelated, I commented a few weeks back about moving from Sony to fuji. You along with a few other fuji TH-camrs really helped me decide on a camera and lens. Very Happy owner of an xt-3 and a 35 f/2. And happily done with Sony. Thank you for the great information that helped me find a camera Im excited to use. Fuji really is different.
Glad to hear you found our videos helpful Bhurnal!
Hi Bhurnal...I also moved from Sony to Fuji, started with the XT-2 and now I have the 50R, of course Andrew help me out decided with his videos and knowledge about the Fuji system.
Just a question, what Sony did you come from?
@@Eduardo_Aguirre Funny, I'm also strongly contemplating making the same move myself. Coming from an A6300 and having an impossible time deciding between the right XT-X or X-Pro X model. Really *really* want a rangefinder, but really want all of the features that come with the XT-X models... choices!
G P if you were asking me...I came from A7RIII
The best feeling...is knowing that you are fortunate. Being Thankful these days is a rare blessing. Savor it. :)
I am thankful that I got my Fuji GS645S working again. I love it more than my digital gear. Great video.
“Obliterate the background” haha, guilty as charged. Dedicated dials on the Fuji wins it for me too.
So why on earth would anyone obliterate the background in the original. Takes a minute to re-arrange the background in photoshop. Bokeh will be seen as gimmickry in future,
FX f1.4 lenses do just as well at blurring backgrounds . Use Barnak software to compare
About the lack of flipscreen on the X1D.
You can see the liveview image and press the shutter on your iPhone/iPad with the Phocus Mobile application that connects automatically to the camera when turned on.
1:34, yes, they do offer better cropping options, but don't forget, they also offer better NOT cropping options for many who never output to 3:2. If you do mostly 4:3, or even 1:1, you actually use all/more of those pixels you paid for.
Good to see you back! Hope all is well or at least getting better. Times are hard right now but your community appreciates you!
Thanks Noah
Thanks for doing this video. I have, like you, been full format curious for some time. :) I did evaluate the Fujifilm 50r with one of the f2.8 lenses and did absolutely love it. I enjoy shooting Fujifilm and Leica for pleasure but I typically use Sony for my full frame portrait, landscape, etc serious projects. Context aside, instead of buying a Fujifilm 50r and appropriate starter glass, I opted to upgrade my Sony to A7riv && and a Sony 135mm f1.8 for roughly the same coin. While I feel I would have enjoyed the 50r more, I still have my XPro3 and Leica lenses to mess around with. In the end, the Sony 60mp and absolutely beautiful 135mm solves 90% of my higher res needs. I await the day the Fujifilm GFX 100 goes on sale along with some of those lenses.
Thanks man! I appreciate the video. I have a feeling Fujifilm will continue to heavily invest in the GFX system. The video functionality of the GFX100 for instance is remarkable. If that trickles down to the more compact GFX’es... and dare I hope, an even more compact GFX model at some point? Would be gold.
Agreed! Good to hear from you, my friend.
Gfx 100s 😁
As a Sony a9 shooter and Fuji xt’s and 100 I find Fuji for its price point someone comes near the hassy look but I’ve seen real large prints from all those and canons and specifically for portraiture the Hassy just has a magic look that has put it on my bucket list to own in the near future..great review btw mate👍
I use a Smallrig halfcase with the GFX 50r and it solves the grip issue perfectly and allows for easy use with a tripod in both portrait and landscape orientation. I am intrigued by Hasselblad’s colour science though and very much like the quest for in-camera perfection of colours and tonality. For the Fuji system, I am very much looking forward to the 80mm 1.7. I think that will be the perfect combo with the GFX50r. Looking forward to your in-depth videos on the Hasselblad lenses!
I absolutely love the GFX 50R design. Using it every day. Don't have any problem with the grip.
My thing about ISO is: auto works.
If you want to adjust the depth of field then you change the aperture. If you want to change the motion blur, adjust the shutter. ISO is just a compensation for the other two. With new cameras you can set a limit on auto iso. So I know my camera doesn't look good above 6400, so I set a limit on 6400 and leave it on auto. Why would you need to adjust it?
My favorite camera is the Hasselblad XPan. Nothing compares to it. I liked the DP0 (21:9) Quattro by Sigma, but prefer the older DP Merrell series for the Foveon Sensor. The Foveon on the Quattros is not the same.. Unfortunately, they do not make a 21:9 version for the Merrell, just have to crop it like that in Photoshop. Prefer the Fuji X series much more over Hassie these days.
Glad to see you back! I love the idea of owning a Hasselblad - because Hasselblad(!)... That being said, I have already decided, I won't buy any more cameras until I have saved up for a high end 35mm rangefinder.
I guess medium format digital cameras for me, are to photography, what Formula 1 race cars are to cars in general (said the cyclist).
Anyway, thank you for another very interesting video.
Hmm I think Fuji GFX has more affordable lenses so makes a lot differences when you buy into „fuller“ frame. But I would fancy a digital back on my Hasselblad 500cm. And use old Zeiss lenses 😍 proper medium.
I get that. I love the look I get with Portra 160 and my 500cm. It’s unrivalled in the overall look and the flextight scans are beautiful. Alt least in my taste. I hope Hasselblad is going further into their heritage. First step is the 907x. In the end an XCD-Camera like the X1d, but with the possibility to use it as a v-System digital back. I tried it and I was amazed. There is some mojo about Hasselblad which they seemed to have lost for a while. The only reason I won’t buy one is the price tag and the sensor size. Hope they‘ll do a 907hv where they use the larger sensor of the h6d. Or even a square one matching the 6x6 format. I don’t even care about megapixels. Everything above 50MP is enough for my taste. I just want the sensor size combined with the pixel-quality of low pixel density sensors.
A 6x6 907x equivalent, where you can use HCD lenses stand alone and the v-System lenses with my 500cm would be my dream system.
I decided to get a 50R, can't wait for it to arrive. Will be using a few Pentax 67 lenses with it.
Christian Lainesse it’s amazing my friend. Hope you enjoy it as much as I have. Would love to see the work you create!
Just as a side-note. The flash-sync is not really that important. Modern studio strobes have either the ability to use HSS or - just as important - they have a very short flash duration, so you freeze movement anyway. Outside it's a different matter but you can still use HSS.
The problem with LS lenses is that they require regular maintenance and that's very expensive, much more expensive than a camera service for the 50R/50S.
They doo?
HSS is not at all the same in terms of power. Different needs for different jobs and if you depend on lighting control on location a leaf shutter and 1/2000s even 1/500s sync is the difference between needing 500w/s 1000w/s 2000w/s 4000w/s etc... HSS makes your 500w/s strobe more like a speedlight in terms of power which limits distance, modifiers, etc, etc, etc... HUGE difference. Thank goodness there's actually a choice which will not be the same for everyone.
Thank you for the in-depth awesome review ! I had both camera as well, and I have to say I got the 50r after seeing your video and I find much much deeper connection with the 50R it is honestly one of the best camera that I have ever used, it just makes you want to shoot , and the image quality is simply stunning ! 50R is simply amazing ! I can't believe I have been missing out on the FUJI world for so long, selling ALL my other cameras and switching to Strictly FUJIs and Ricoh GRIII !
Love your videos, just switched to Fuji and got an X-T30. Your videos really made me fall in love with the brand and the system!
16:24 X1Dii has three levels of touch sensitivity in the menu setting. Have you try it? I found my X1Dii touch screen very responsive and sensitive
Thanks for sharing your experience and shots. It feels like Fuji has spent more time trying to understand their end users and Hasselblad has let visual design come before function... Both are amazing though, but I'd probably go for a 50r as a step up from my X-T2.
Nice comparison of these 2 systems, Andrew! In your opinion, if you were a 100% stills only, landscape, and small product photographer, which system do you think would work best, including evaluating lens sharpness and detail rendition, assuming one shoots 100% tripod-mounted, and 10 second self timer for optimum sharpness? Thank you!
+1 Awesome review/comparison, still relevant in 2024.
With which camera Hasselblad or Fuji was the 1:47 portrait of young girl made?
Three quick comments. 1. The first thing I thought as I hit play was "Can these be cropped to emulate the X-Pan look that Andrew loves? Apparently, Yes. 2. Hasselblad putting the shutter in the lens seems wasteful. You would be re-buying an expensive component with each lens. I don't understand that. 3. If Fujifilm could get a GFX sensor in something closer to an X100 series format (including leaf shutter!) it would be game over.
1. Yes! 2. Leaf shutters are extremely popular in the studio. 3. Oh man. I would sell plasma on a daily basis to be able to buy an X100V with a GFX size sensor. :)
The advantages of leaf shutter against focal plane shutter are:
Full flash sync for all shutter speeds up to 1/2000s, no necessity of HSS or HS flash sync that looses a lot of power, this is a big advantage for outdoor flash in bright sunlight and big apertures.
Much lower shutter vibrations than focal plane curtains, because modern leaf shutters have 4 tiny carbon leaves, in each leaf pair the vibrations of one leaf is subtracted from the vibrations of the opposite leaf.
Scott Magoon if you did much studio work you would realise the need for a high shutter speed.
Having used both these cameras, although rented!. Just one thing that totally makes X1D II worth it over Fuji 50R/S.
16Bit RAW!
The colours are out of this world and with right post processing techniques the 16Bit RAW files truly shine. The kind of highlight gradation it holds is truly astounding. 16Bit alone is worth the premium, the next MF camera price wise that shoots 16Bit is Fuji GFX 100, and that's roughly 10k.
It's only 14 bit raw, oversampled to 16 bit in post processing... from what I understand.
Although X1D2 is 14bit upsampling to 16bit. The colour output from X1D2 really amazing. I love the advantage of its lens leaf shutter that enable high speed flash sync to 1/2000 that I can shoot with fill flash in daylight (Nikon compatible flash). Long time exposure can be insanely up to 68 minutes. Most other cameras cannot do that. I have the camera so I know.
My friend owns the Hass, I own the 50R it wins hand down! 😁 Fuji ☝️
Until you hit that flash sync limit. Plus 16bit vrs 14bit A/D conversion. But ok
@@dustylense do you own the Hass?
@@memcrew1 yes
Is it possible to get your classic chrome profile you created? Interested to see what it brings :)
Even though these systems are great, I've been looking at older medium format cameras. Yes, the tech is a lot older but the resolution, depth and color, I think is still there. I saw a Leica S2 (37mp) with a 70mm 2.8 Leica lens with two batteries and CF card for $2800. I couldn't believe my eyes. Should have purchased it. My loss. Even some older digital Mamiya 645s, and Hasselblads are priced under $3000 with a lens and other accessories. You just have to continually be on the hunt on eBay to find these great deals. Nice vid as usual.
Thanks Andrew. I’ve been hoping for this vid ever since I noticed the tags on your Instagram photos recently! Great stuff. That Hasselblad design has so much potential.
Indeed!
I absolutely agree with your experience on the Gfx 50R. As much as I would love to keep it, comming from X-Pro2 this was a big quality downgrade at the time as I bought the GFX. It feels horrible in the hands, and that carry over buttons and joystick from the XT line apear tiny on this camera. Also the thick sticking out frame around the screen was a disapointment for me. If Fuji gives this system as much love as they do for the X-Pro line, then I would invest in it again!!!
This was great. Thanks! And, for what it’s worth, I agree with you on the 3 dial thing. In fact, I’ve been dreaming of 4 dedicated dials; one each for shutter, aperature, iso, and white balance. First world problems, I know, but I hate fiddling to find secondary buttons for adjusting iso and WB. One can only dream! Cheers.
Glad you are back. Sweet emotions is why most of us shoot, so keep it up. I am still working on getting the most of my S1r, so I am not ready for the full frame. Cool leather case, I miss them in modern cameras.
No question Fuji. Based upon lens cost and selection. Hassy much more expensive.
the reason hassy lenses are so expensive is they have leaf shutter mechanism good for high speed flash sync. fuji don't i have the gfx 50r and some gf lenses sync speed 250sec blaaah
@@tedtedsen269 yeah, there ya go. Fuji much more budget friendly, plus you have better range of lenses to choose from.
I think you have eyes for the Hasselblad,Do you see a problem attaching Canon tilt shift lenses on the Hasselblad?
Good video. But I get the feeling there is a variable missing in that equation. With the same sensor there is also the Pentax 645Z. It's a bulkier camera but a real tool and fun to work with because of the grip and the OVF.
The Pentax is also a true medium format camera, which neither the Hassy nor the GFX aspire to, if "only" a 645. It is, however, twice the weight of the X1D II (1550 gr vs 770 gr). The price drop to $5000 helps, though.
@@leonardnorwitz3537 Mirrorless is in today. It makes sense for cameras to become significantly lighter and smaller, at least for me. Sometimes, however, I get the impression that this is quickly compensated for by the size and weight of modern lenses. Everyone must determine for themselves the essential factors to make the decision on which camera it should be. The OVF and the handling, the grip of the Pentax were decisive for me in direct comparison to the Fuji. And there are plenty of very good and inexpensive used lenses for the Pentax on the market.
2:51 fyi Panasonic S-series also have 65:24 ;) And the Sigma fp has some truly funky inline aspects like "√2:1" (Golden Ratio, I think?), 7:6 + 7:3
Bless you :)
How did they arrived at that brick design? It looks like the old fujifilm medium format cameras the 6x7 and 6x9. Those were bigger though.
Extrememy informative ! I was sure you and David Hancock are friends. Hugs to both of you ! Congrats !
I never had any issue with my x1d 2 toutch screen.
Great review. Totally agree with on the OOC colors of the X1Dii. Best colors from any camera, I struggle to move one slider in LR. I ended up selling it though, couldn’t live with the lead shutter and terrible electronic one that not only creates banding, but terrible jello effect. Keep up the good work.
I used MK1 version of Hassie before Fujifilm. Did Hasselblad finished the product ? I did not notice last time when I had mk2 for a few day's. For designer seems to be more important that the one must stare in to Hasselblad logo for 5 seconds then to take photo of the momentum. It might be nice camera and system for someone who does not shoot photos.
Panasonic S1R also has the 65:24 X-Pan ratio. Used to have the 50R. Now using an X1D 4116.
How come you left out the Pentax 645Z 51mp MF which is priced between the X1D and GFX?
How about the GFX50R vr the 50S??
Any comments on the Fuji lenses? Thanks
I've owned both and just could never like the 50R... I respected it but never liked shooting with it. It felt huge, clumsy and not at all streamlined from the 50S to call it a travel camera like some do. The X1D2 is more expensive but I would rather pay the money and be happy. If the Fuji Omega comes out I would consider that for studio work but for now Fuji remains my ultralight travel gear (XE3) and the X1D2 is my everyday home gear and no compromise gear that I will pack if the trip is worth it.
what's the point of mechanical shutter in an mirrorless digital camera?
I think the Hasselblad is a much higher build quality, it’s menus system is industry leading and very similar to Leica. The Hasselblad lenses are far far superior and leaf shutters always out perform focal plane shutters, the processor produces better colors and together they produce far superior images. Fuji build is fair, interface is fair, lenses are at bottom for MF systems, while cheaper than Leica S or Hasselblad lenses they bring up the rear. If image quality is the goal with MF, Fuji may not punch that ticket with those lenses.
Сlaim that Fuji lenses are the bottom is insane, especially since Fujifilm has always made optics for Hasselblad.
Thanks for this video. I have been seriously considering the GFX for a while now. Great to see this comparison video. I hope all is well!
What are your thoughts on the Leica Q2? I know its a fixed lens but its 45MP and sorta pushes in the medium format range without being there.... and its a Leica. Would love to see you review that and get your thoughts.
I have a Q2 and while I love that camera, I would like to have one of these cameras to have access to panoramic formats.
Overpriced, overhyped, megapixels alone don't mean much. Sony A7R4 has 64mp and still delivers less than the GFX50R.
@Prashanth Panicker I don't want to be that "guy" but are you really comparing Fuji to Leica in quality? I have had a number of Fuji cameras myself for years and I don't even think this is a real conversation to be had... Just being honest. I'll say that most people that have an issue with Leica (I've found) are the ones that either can't afford to buy them and are very stern on having multiple lenses (in their price range). Additionally, in the case of the Q2 most have issue with the fixed lens... and I see that as a limitation on many of the reviews and photographers imagination. In short, from a current fuji user, Hasselblad and Leica do belong in the same conversation (in my opinion) but Fuji doesn't have a seat at that table. Just my opinion.
@@rodsilva80 what's your current kit? and/or are you just responding with specs from different manufacturers? Do you have both the Sony A7R4 and the GFX50R?
@@smichaelpridgen do your homework, there are lots of reviews comparing both. I own the medium format GFX50R.
Dynamic range is better on the Hasselblad Files vs Fuji. So it is superior for Nightscapes or Fashion with Extravagant Lighting.
My fix for this crave of the medium format look: Lumix S5ii + Voigtlander Nokton 40mm f1.2 VM aspherical. The lens is tiny, with the leica M to L mount adapter which is also tiny it provides a very compact and good looking setup. @AndrewGoodCamera you should give it a shot, it really produces awesome photos and lots of people told me it feels like medium format :)
If you take some time to study how the X1D works you will find that you can change focus point with the dials.
You can also reprogram buttons to what you want.
Right. I am aware. That's even more kludgy though. And reprogramming dials is great, but I can't reprogram a third dial out of thin air.
Andrew & Denae if you are aware, why neg comment
@@nigelroberson8911 not sure what you mean.
Oui, tu as raison sur la partie ergonomique. Mais Hasselblad offre d’incroyables résultats photographiques, ce n’est pas le cas de Fuji dont les résultats ne sont pas la hauteur de la taille du capteur !
Looks like perfect cameras for selfies and vacation photos.
Guess I won't know why the absence, but just can't join every YT channel that I follow...
Enjoy your video and I plan on getting the GFX50R. I also have a Pentax 6 x 7 system and I’m very curious if I can use the 6 x 7 lenses with the DFX 50R and if so with what adapter?
I may get the the next Hasselblad X1D but I need about 4fps and much better AF.. ( Fuji should buy Hasselblad and make it their Deluxe division )
What strap do you have on the 50r? Thanks!
I do appreciate this video. Thinking of getting a GFX for a two week road trip later this year.
Hasselblad should take part of this video and use it for an ad! Is there a setting for panoramic aspect ratio, do you just crop the photo that way?
Have you ever seen an ad from Hasselblad?
When deciding on the Hass speed shouldn’t be your consideration because it’ll just leave you frustrated. Having said that the X1D II is far from slow, it takes a couple seconds to load up when first switched on but that’s not an issue for me. It’s a thing of beauty. Oh and re the lcd screen being unresponsive .. mine is super responsive so I’m not sure why you had that issue.
The Fuji is just fugly and it’s a reason I dumped my Sony alpha’s, Sony glass is phenomenal but their bodies lack imagination. The colour science on the Hass too, magical pics all the time.
The colors out of the X1D is what would be the selling point. But either is way out of my budget.
Thanks for the review. Would you mind sharing what camera this video was shot with?
Orange shutter button is perfect !
When you shoot in 24x65 mode in the Hasselblad, do you see this aspect ratio in the viewfinder and in the display too? Second question... are the images already cropped in this proportions when you import them in the software for post processing or do you need to crop them again?
Yes. It is a built-in aspect ratio option. If you shoot in JPG, it will come out cropped. If you shoot in RAW, depending on your RAW editor, it will crop to the 24:65 by default, but you can still uncrop it to the full resolution.
@@AndrewGoodCamera Thanks for the info! ;-)
Firstly, welcome back. Secondly, as ever, a great in-depth review. 👍
Hi, did you find any difference betweern the 14 and 16 bit raws?
I can't say that I did. I prefer the Hasselblad raw files though, if I'm honest. But that's more of a color and feel than anything scientific.
I compared these cameras and bought Hasselblad. Hasselblad is slower but the quality of the images are considerable. The colors are more natural and has a huge advantage if you have to convert them to CMYK, especially in a color managed workflow. I love the leaf shutter also as I used to use flash outdoor also.
Adapting lenses: Cambo has a special Canon/XCD adapter. I used it with Canon TS24 lens and it gave me better results than with the Canon 5DsR. Another breathtaking experience came with the Otus 85…
It would be awesome if you could make a video about those Mamiya 645 lenses on the Fuji GFX system, I just got the 80mm f1.9 for the GFX50r, can't wait
How long does it take to read the whole sensor on silent Electronic mode?
Great comparison and insight!
As a swede it's quite funny how you say "Hassel" in a Swedish accent(kinda) and then "blad" in an American accent, and after a few minutes you switch it up and do the opposite 😁
No effort was made to supply an accurate accent. ;)
Im waiting on something like 45 P but one wider around 35 and one more tele around 65 then I'll burn cash for them. For the love of god the hassy is super sexy.
Always enjoy your videos. Let me ask you, couldn't a mirror-less camera be programmed through firmware to accept a leaf shutter? Essential it's just on off?
Never heard of anyone trying this. But that'd be cool.
Hey Andrew --- any reason why the Pentax 645 wasn't included in this head-to-head?? (apologies if it was mentioned - I'm going to look at the video now but that was my immediate question after seeing the title - lol ).
Little older camera, but with the same sensor is the 645z and it has a TON of great glass!
Waiting for the hass HD mk3 to come out then the mark 2 used market price should make them a great pickup
Is it true you could adapt hasselblad lenses having leaf shutter on the gfx?
I've not heard that. But unless the adapter you use has an aperture ring built-in, you'd have to shoot the hasselblad's wide open all the time.
Actually, no that wouldn't work because the flange distance is too long.
@@AndrewGoodCamera how does this guy does it? th-cam.com/video/dp6E3HrzZOo/w-d-xo.html
x2dとgfx100s共に
所有して比較しました
自分の撮影にはgfxが合ってるかなx2dもコンパクトでデザインも素晴らしいから良かったんだけどシャッターレリーズの不具合なのか設定なのかシャッターのトラブルが多いので処分しました
How many pixel Size XIDII had ?
Totally agree with your comment on ISO adjustment. But to go one step further. You should also be able to immediately see, in a mirrorless camera EVF, the changes ISO makes to the image. And however the camera indicates the under to over exposure should be live during ISO dial adjustment. Just like changing the shutter and aperture dials. And in my opinion even on a DSLR where you have to press a button to get to ISO adjustment, changing ISO should change the under to over exposure indicator live.
For my style X1D better, most beautiful camera in the world. And best colour accuracy in the world.
Love the channel and am thinking of selling my M6 and buying a GFX 50R. Is it well built? Says ‘magnesium body’ but can’t seem to find whether it has a metal chassis as per XPro3?
I sold the M6 TTL for the GFX50R and very happy. I think it's magnesium, yes.
Correct. Magnesium alloy. It does feel well-built to me. Nothing feels cheap and I've had no issues relating to build quality or durability.
@@AndrewGoodCamera Thanks...it's helped me as I want a robust, well made camera that has longevity. Images look fantastic. By the way, keep doing what you're doing on youtube - your's is my favourite youtube channel - find it really informative and helpful. Stay safe,
Where is that strap from? Not the case, just the strap. It looks like the perfect thickness for the 50R
same place
I've been using the GFX50R with the 23mm and 32-64mm f4 for 18 months now. I am always amazed by the IQ (I shoot landscapes). I thought a while back that maybe it was too much camera for me and nearly sold it, but it was when I looked back at the images that I just couldn't part with it. I really wish they made a 16-35mm equivalent (so a 20-45) wide-angle zoom, then it'd be the perfect landscape camera - for me anyway.
I totally agree. I wasn't thinking the GFX IQ would be all that big a difference, but I'm addicted to the freedom the resolution provides and how gorgeous the micro contrast is.
@@AndrewGoodCamera for me it's the detail and the "look". the only camera I'v enjoyed as much IQ wise was / is a Nikon D700. Both cameras have that "something". Haed to pinpoint, just a well look I guess.
The fuji Xtrans is isolated only to the X series crop sensor bodies, and actually not all of the X series bodies. The GFX line uses a standard Bayer color array. Still, using both systems, the GFX 50R is way more versatile. I still ended up going with the X series Hasselblad because I had too much invested in the H series cameras. It was a logical move, but I really miss using the fuji for alternative lenses. Using the X1dII in electronic shutter mode is just not that great.
Have you tried mounting the Xpan lenses in the Hasselblad? Would you get banding issues when you mount those lenses?
It wouldn't matter. Any non-native Hasselblad XC lens will get you banding when used at certain shutter speeds in artificial lighting.
Excellent comparison! You gave me a lot of user insight, which I didn't know and as I am about to move to medium format, your video came as a ring to my finger :) Best wishes and regards from Uruguay. Suscribed!
Great video even if don't plan to buy an medium format camera...
I really really miss your photo duels. Hope you can do some more in the near future.
Us too. Hard without daycare these days. :(
The X1D II 50C is an absolute beast. Hands down the best camera i've ever shot with. 100mp would be nice though.
It will come early next year - also with tilting screen - do not ask me how I know
Camera Prize is just one but also the lenses on Hasselblad are quite expensive, aren`t it?
Can we do touch and drag to focus on GFX while having eyes on evf?
Yes. Fuji calls it the "Touch screen area setting"