BM5. Naive Set Theory

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 22

  • @MathCuriousity
    @MathCuriousity ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for your kindness! I now you may be “retired” from offering new videos on here but I’d like to reinvigorate your passion to help others: I think the ONLY thing your playlist needs here to be complete: is a nice couple videos on elementary linear algebra and vector spaces! Analogous to how you beautifully laid out set theory! PLEASEEEEEEEE! I can’t find anybody that teaches the way you do with static information on the board forcing both the teacher and the learner to absorb info as opposed to PowerPoint or videos with graphics that can overwhelm and force us to fly thru stuff under the false impression that we learned the material !

  • @integralmath
    @integralmath 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    And yet another excellent video. I really like your casual, matter of fact delivery - to include the gesticulations.

  • @nimaaj9650
    @nimaaj9650 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very much for your time and your videos... They are a goldmine for me(not a math major). I really wish there were more people like you in the world =)

  • @robertosobalvarro9233
    @robertosobalvarro9233 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for uploading these videos. They're very helpful.

  • @MathDoctorBob
    @MathDoctorBob  12 ปีที่แล้ว

    You're welcome, and thanks for the kind words! It's still early - I can't imagine what teaching will look like in 5-10 years.

    • @patbateman69420
      @patbateman69420 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's been 5 years! Thanks for all your videos. I've been having a really rough time with my self study and your videos are a big help.
      Maybe one day you'll have the resources to make more videos!

  • @boughouabdou605
    @boughouabdou605 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very useful Doc:) well done

  • @ChenMakesVids
    @ChenMakesVids 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm already familiar with this material but it was still helpful to watch. thank you!

  • @MathDoctorBob
    @MathDoctorBob  12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks! That makes sense. Of course, it's useful to warn that it varies by source. - Bob

  • @MathDoctorBob
    @MathDoctorBob  13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @paul1964uk Yes. It's annoying that we don't have right word for group theory. We often want to exclude both the trivial subgroup and the entire group from statements. Non-trivial suggests excluding only the trivial group, and proper should include the trivial group. Ay! - Bob

  • @paul1964uk
    @paul1964uk 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ah, the 'proper subset' symbol consists the 'is a subset of' symbol over a modified 'is not equal to' (the crossed bar) symbol

  • @teacherjennofficial7328
    @teacherjennofficial7328 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good day Sir. Can you recommend me a best book or PDF of Set Theory? Thank you in advance Sir.

  • @pmpritamnayak5744
    @pmpritamnayak5744 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can someone please send me the PDF of Neive set theory

  • @tanaka7391
    @tanaka7391 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ty sir

  • @MathDoctorBob
    @MathDoctorBob  13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @ICarnag3I Thanks! There are some really counterintuitive results at the foundations of math. I'm definitely wired better for physics-based math. - Bob

  • @MathDoctorBob
    @MathDoctorBob  12 ปีที่แล้ว

    You're welcome!

  • @nephtie
    @nephtie 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If bob has the body of a god.
    Bob -> body of a god
    Bob = god.
    Holy cow bob, you're a god.

  • @teacherjennofficial7328
    @teacherjennofficial7328 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much Sir :-)

  • @teacherjennofficial7328
    @teacherjennofficial7328 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hoping that you will notice me Sir. God bless you always.

  • @lumin9385
    @lumin9385 ปีที่แล้ว

    Naive..? Add a "t" between "a" and "i"

  • @robertwilsoniii2048
    @robertwilsoniii2048 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is great.

  • @MathDoctorBob
    @MathDoctorBob  13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks! I'm getting used to the new studio. Low ceiling, but it could be worse. The hands drive some people crazy; they are lucky I'm holding something. I occasionally slip into Clinton/Obama. - Bob