The Din Pac CC 7200 roller is impressive, but I couldn’t help but chuckle at the idea of it only going 11 km/h. In some ways, it feels like a giant boulder slowly rolling down a hill! However, its sheer weight and ability to compact asphalt effectively really highlight the importance of having the right tools for the job. But it raises an interesting point about the scale of machinery in construction. With advancements in technology, are we moving toward a future where mega machinery becomes the norm? I’m curious if there’s a point where the size and power of these machines might outstrip the need for them. What do others think about the trend towards larger equipment in construction?
I found the segment on the ACO 1700 grader quite nostalgic as it represents a bygone era of construction machinery. The fact that it was never used due to commercial restrictions is a real missed opportunity for the industry. It raises an interesting point about how certain innovations can become obsolete before they even get a chance to shine. With technology advancing so rapidly, how do we ensure that we're not overlooking groundbreaking designs simply because they don't fit current market needs? Perhaps a discussion on the potential revival of retro designs with modern technology could lead to some innovative solutions. Are there older machines that you think could be re-engineered for today’s construction needs?
@@ExtremeMachinesZone Haha, exactly! The Din Pac CC 7200 roller is massive, but that 11 km/h top speed is almost comical. It's like watching a giant tortoise bulldozing through a construction site! But you’re right, it's the sheer weight and compacting power that make it essential. I sometimes wonder, though, are we reaching a point where the size of these machines will plateau? There must be a practical limit to how big we can go, or will innovation keep pushing those boundaries even further?
@@HeavyMachineryEquipment That’s a good question! When I saw the ACO 1700 grader, it reminded me of how sometimes the industry moves on before a machine even has its day in the sun. The fact that it was shelved due to market restrictions just shows how quickly things change. Imagine if we could take some of those retro designs and rework them with today’s technology. Who knows? Maybe some of those “outdated” concepts would actually meet modern needs perfectly. What older machines would you bring back, if you could?
@@ExtremeMachinesZone Good point! I can think of some older machines, like the Bucyrus-Erie 2570 dragline excavator, that might still have something to offer with a few upgrades. It was a beast for mining, and I wonder if adding modern tech, like autonomous features, could bring it back in a new way. Sometimes old designs just need a little modernization to be relevant again. Do you think the industry is open to reviving these classics?
@@HeavyMachineryEquipment Exactly! The draglines are legendary. They could be retrofitted with sensors and new materials to reduce weight, maybe even improve fuel efficiency. But I think the industry’s obsession with “bigger is better” sometimes overshadows these ideas. We focus on size and horsepower, but maybe there’s room for revisiting some classic designs. Or is it too much of a risk for companies to invest in old concepts?
lástima que diga tantos absurdos,como decir que la pavimentadora mide 24metros de ancho,cuando en realidad no tiene más de diez,o esa pendejada de caballos de vapor,o por ahí también dice que la motoniveladora tiene 26centimetrosde ancho
![เจ็บที่ยังฮัก - ม่อน วรวิทย์ [ Official Mv ] จอนนี่มิวสิค](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/KALIGSRSjFs/mqdefault.jpg)
Genial😊
Por favor al próximo video añada el costo de cada máquina.gracias
7:25 en Puerto Rico, se tira el asfalto por carril, y muchas veces,el otro carril días después. Esto hace que no se unan y aparezcan grietas
No le veo sentido en referir sobre maquinas que no estan operativas en la actualidad, como lo haces en algunas maquinas
❤😮
Genial !!
Primero en comentarios y tercero en dar like 😅
The Din Pac CC 7200 roller is impressive, but I couldn’t help but chuckle at the idea of it only going 11 km/h. In some ways, it feels like a giant boulder slowly rolling down a hill! However, its sheer weight and ability to compact asphalt effectively really highlight the importance of having the right tools for the job. But it raises an interesting point about the scale of machinery in construction. With advancements in technology, are we moving toward a future where mega machinery becomes the norm? I’m curious if there’s a point where the size and power of these machines might outstrip the need for them. What do others think about the trend towards larger equipment in construction?
I found the segment on the ACO 1700 grader quite nostalgic as it represents a bygone era of construction machinery. The fact that it was never used due to commercial restrictions is a real missed opportunity for the industry. It raises an interesting point about how certain innovations can become obsolete before they even get a chance to shine. With technology advancing so rapidly, how do we ensure that we're not overlooking groundbreaking designs simply because they don't fit current market needs? Perhaps a discussion on the potential revival of retro designs with modern technology could lead to some innovative solutions. Are there older machines that you think could be re-engineered for today’s construction needs?
@@ExtremeMachinesZone Haha, exactly! The Din Pac CC 7200 roller is massive, but that 11 km/h top speed is almost comical. It's like watching a giant tortoise bulldozing through a construction site! But you’re right, it's the sheer weight and compacting power that make it essential. I sometimes wonder, though, are we reaching a point where the size of these machines will plateau? There must be a practical limit to how big we can go, or will innovation keep pushing those boundaries even further?
@@HeavyMachineryEquipment That’s a good question! When I saw the ACO 1700 grader, it reminded me of how sometimes the industry moves on before a machine even has its day in the sun. The fact that it was shelved due to market restrictions just shows how quickly things change. Imagine if we could take some of those retro designs and rework them with today’s technology. Who knows? Maybe some of those “outdated” concepts would actually meet modern needs perfectly. What older machines would you bring back, if you could?
@@ExtremeMachinesZone Good point! I can think of some older machines, like the Bucyrus-Erie 2570 dragline excavator, that might still have something to offer with a few upgrades. It was a beast for mining, and I wonder if adding modern tech, like autonomous features, could bring it back in a new way. Sometimes old designs just need a little modernization to be relevant again. Do you think the industry is open to reviving these classics?
@@HeavyMachineryEquipment Exactly! The draglines are legendary. They could be retrofitted with sensors and new materials to reduce weight, maybe even improve fuel efficiency. But I think the industry’s obsession with “bigger is better” sometimes overshadows these ideas. We focus on size and horsepower, but maybe there’s room for revisiting some classic designs. Or is it too much of a risk for companies to invest in old concepts?
Chongon banda chingon
el pana quiere comprar por docenas...😂😂
😮
😮🎉❤
Denme like 😢
4k HAVE A LITTLE BIT LAG
Es mejor la lleva de una solar vez y lleva bue nivel slds graciadokl
Las gruas torres no cargan tanto
lástima que diga tantos absurdos,como decir que la pavimentadora mide 24metros de ancho,cuando en realidad no tiene más de diez,o esa pendejada de caballos de vapor,o por ahí también dice que la motoniveladora tiene 26centimetrosde ancho