ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก

Evolution of Mikoyan MiG Jet Fighter (1940-2019)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ธ.ค. 2019
  • ► More Military videos on ‘THE BUZZ’: • 10 Most Powerful Howit...
    🏆 Video Information:
    In today’s video, we would like to present you guys, the evolution of the MiG jet fighter right from 1940 to 2019. Our list will only include military production aircraft. We will not include those which are not yet in service or the experimental aircraft
    Enjoy watching. Cheers!
    🔝 Sources & Credits:-
    military.wikia.org/wiki/
    www.wikipedia.org/
    www.militaryfactory.com/
    www.naval-technology.com/weap...
    www.military-today.com/
    www.simpleplanes.com/
    The Buzz does not own the rights to these pictures or video clips. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others. However, if any content owners would like their images/clips to be credited or removed, please contact us by email at-thebuzz938@gmail.com.
    #MiG #jetfighter #aircraft #military

ความคิดเห็น • 695

  • @Reyeoux
    @Reyeoux 4 ปีที่แล้ว +714

    Ah yes, my favourite jet fighters, the MiG-1 and MiG-3

    • @Rey-vh7qw
      @Rey-vh7qw 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

    • @-nomi-6516
      @-nomi-6516 4 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      Jet fighter?

    • @dylanlawsonbrown5283
      @dylanlawsonbrown5283 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Mine are the later ones with turbofan engines. Amazing that Mig managed to get its propellerless jet fighters to run on airliner engines! They must have been several em ems big.

    • @mattiasilverii3188
      @mattiasilverii3188 4 ปีที่แล้ว +62

      My favorite jet fighter is the Bf 109.

    • @lizzyfur125
      @lizzyfur125 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      lmao im dying here

  • @eriksab1609
    @eriksab1609 4 ปีที่แล้ว +106

    Poor Gurevich, you completely left him out.

  • @Lancer9_270
    @Lancer9_270 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Mikoyan, one of my favorite fighter jet manufacturers of all time
    Especially the Mig-29

    • @TextualTennis28
      @TextualTennis28 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      A thing that many do not know:
      In practice all western fighers nowadays have ability to use pilot helmet HUDs and lock a target just by looking into it. This is considered a new feature however, "first seen" at the 2010s.
      However, the MiG-29 had both features already when it was commissioned, though the locking only worked with the R-27, which was a poorly working fail missile.

    • @TextualTennis28
      @TextualTennis28 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But still impressive

  • @tommcglone2867
    @tommcglone2867 4 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    The MiG-25 is an astonishing bird. A jet figther developed over 50 years ago capable of Mach 3 and its still able to outrun the vast majority of modern fighters.

    • @KillerSniper55
      @KillerSniper55 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      only issue was its turning circle was the size of the US.

    • @A-G-F-
      @A-G-F- 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@KillerSniper55 pretty much all the interceptors suffered from that

    • @xlotyliciux
      @xlotyliciux 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@KillerSniper55 Interceptors of the time were built specifically for speed, ceiling, and rate of climb at the expense of all other concerns. Midair refueling was in its absolute infancy and purebred interceptors, defending home air space, could reliably be sure that they'd only be flying to counter high altitude supersonic bomber threats. Irony is, the U.S. believed the MiG-25, in development, to be an aircraft more like the Su-27. The U.S. developed the F-15 in response, resulting in the Soviets developing the actual Su-27.

    • @garfieldfarkle
      @garfieldfarkle ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It needs to be fast in order to run away when F-15 or F-16s show up.
      The MiG-25 was developed to intercept the SR-71 and failed every time.
      It is an interceptor that has done very little intercepting.
      It's a good-looking plane, no doubt.

    • @python3215
      @python3215 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@KillerSniper55 no actually it had a lot more issues than that, the MiG-25 was a very ineffective aircraft. Sure it could go Mach 3+ but only for a couple minutes max, and it would cause permanent damage to the engine and airframe, the engine usually had to be replaced once they landed. It also did not have the fuel capacity to work well, even going at a low cruising speed, it had a very low range. Not to mention that it turned like a boat.

  • @dms110D
    @dms110D 4 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    Good Wikipedia read. Love to see the MiG-3 Jet fighters and the non descript models for which you got the statistics for

    • @gammersunity4117
      @gammersunity4117 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      yeah dude found that myself too, I was just looking for some images

  • @feedgaming1331
    @feedgaming1331 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    MIG-17 and MIG-21 were legendary fighters of the 20th century!
    Vietnamese pilots flying MIG-21 shot down B-52 in 1972 in Hanoi

    • @darthvader5558
      @darthvader5558 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      There is more
      In 2019 a Indian Mig21 shot down a Pakistani f16
      😎 damn this mig 21 is such a legend

    • @14abhisekmahapatra41
      @14abhisekmahapatra41 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@darthvader5558mig 21 was a legend
      If the safety issues were revised then it might be the best one

    • @Legoboy453
      @Legoboy453 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@darthvader5558if it was against the F22 Nah the mig21 won't survive bro

    • @darthvader5558
      @darthvader5558 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Legoboy453 Well yes but my man I'm not taking about the 5th-Gen F22 Raptor
      I'm taking about the Pakistani F16 Block 15 (80's model + it didn't have the complete F16 weapons package) which was chased and and shot down by an Indian MIG 21 BISON (UPG standard upgraded, this upgrade gave the MIG 21a better Radar, avionics, upgraded cockpit etc and enabled it to use air-to-to missiles from the MIG 29's arsenal)

  • @cappuccinogoodfinger
    @cappuccinogoodfinger 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Sukhoi : *develops supermanueverability against missiles
    Migs : Lulz *speeds up

  • @romank4905
    @romank4905 4 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    Some side notes to the video : 1) as you see there were no more piston-engined fighters after Mig-3. This is due to the fact that Mig-3 was overspecialised as a high-altitude interceptor, and was a relatively poor dogfighter. Throughout WW2 the Soviets have been very confined in resources, so the decision was made to abandon production and development of Migs and focus on that of Ilyushin IL-2 ground attack and Yakovlev Yak-3 fighter aircraft. 2) Mig-9 and Mig-15 have been developed and built when the Soviet jet engine R&D was in its infancy. Mig-9 engine was based on the reverse engineered BMW engines captured from the defeated Nazi Germany, and Mig-15 engine was based on Rolls Royce Nene engine purchased from the UK. 3) Mig-15 was developed with the threat of American B-29 bombers in mind, so it was optimised for shooting down large and tough aircraft (the use of 37mm cannon). As a side effect, it had a slightly poorer shooting accuracy than that of its counterpart, F-86 Sabre. 4) The picture of Mig-15 actually depicts Mig-15 Uti, the twin-seated trainer version of Mig-15. 5) Mig-27 is based on the same platform as Mig-23, in fact, it has originally been developed as a variant of Mig-23. 6) An interesting feature of Mig-23 and Mig-27 is a foldable ventral fin, which increases directional stability at high speed. 7) Mig-29 was actually never intended to counter F-15, Sukhoi Su-27 was. Mig-29 is a light fighter and was meant to fulfil the same role as F-16.

    • @babsrahman
      @babsrahman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The MiG-29 wasn't designed to fufil the same role as the F-16. That's another myth.
      The MiG-29 was designed as a short range interceptor aircraft directed by ground controllers.
      The F-16 was designed as a cost effective, lightweight multi role air superiority fighter and ground strike aircraft.

    • @romank4905
      @romank4905 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Babs Rahman you are clearly confusing it with Mig-25. Please go read Mig-29 design history. It was designed based on “Advanced Frontline Fighter” specification and acquired mostly by Soviet VVS (air force) and not PVO (air defence force). The plane was integrated with helmet mounted sights and dogfight missiles. Does such armament make any sense for an interceptor?

    • @babsrahman
      @babsrahman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@romank4905 My terminology was misleading. The MiG-29 is an air superiority fighter but its role was that of a short range frontline fighter jet guided by GCI, fire off its R-27 and then return to base. But it could also dogfight with its HMD, R-77 missiles and cannon should the need arise.
      Compared to the F-16, the MiG-29 had a shorter range and inferior situational awareness. It wasn't a datalinked multirole fighter jet like the F-16, at least not originally. They have different roles.
      My original point was that the MiG-29 and F-16 are not like each other, they had different missions. F-16 suited US offensive air warfare doctrine. The MiG-29 was a defensive fighter, guided by ground control to intercept incoming NATO aircraft.
      The F-15 and Su-27 were similar though.

    • @gruzza9000
      @gruzza9000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yqll nerds , mig 29 is a spce craft , meant to take communism to mars and stalinate the solar system
      Duh

    • @molstad182
      @molstad182 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gruzza9000 obviously, the main space plane that the commies were gonna send up there was the Po-2 since it has the best zero gravity performance(may or may not have been tested)

  • @Reyeoux
    @Reyeoux 4 ปีที่แล้ว +99

    Is anyone gonna talk about how the MiG-15 on the thumbnail is labeled as a MiG-9

    • @matteochiesurin2365
      @matteochiesurin2365 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      She doesn’t know what she’s talking about :/

    • @fattyMcGee97
      @fattyMcGee97 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Or how the video says the mig15 is faster than it actually was by about 100km/h.

    • @aangxazor5759
      @aangxazor5759 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ohh I saw that comment too late

    • @aangxazor5759
      @aangxazor5759 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      And she is saying that the mig 17 has an afterburner

    • @Reyeoux
      @Reyeoux 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Some variants of the MiG-17 had an afterburner, like the MiG-17F or the Chinese produced Shenyang F-5

  • @micheldaveau8827
    @micheldaveau8827 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Top technology, respect and congratulations....!!

  • @gunsnrosesforever100
    @gunsnrosesforever100 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love seeing the cockpit view when they fly in formation, you can't appreciate how much work is going jnto not crashing into each other from the ground but when you see the cockpit view its a whole different story hahaha

  • @siamaktahaeiyaghoubi897
    @siamaktahaeiyaghoubi897 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I like MIG-25 Foxbat and MIG-29 Fulcrum most. MIG-25 was developed to stop American Blackbirds from intercepting and it was very successful. It used to be called the iron fist of the Soviets. Then comes MIG-29 which is such a legendary fighter. When Germany was reunited, some of the Fulcrums from East Germany took part in NATO manoeuvres and used to outperform the best American fighters (e.g. F-15 Eagle). Yeah...that's the way it was

  • @xxw379k
    @xxw379k 4 ปีที่แล้ว +245

    Why do you call the piston engine equipped MIG-1 one for a jet fighter????

    • @sanktrobel2421
      @sanktrobel2421 4 ปีที่แล้ว +67

      Bc she has no clue what she is talking about. This is completely Fubar.

    • @bestamerica
      @bestamerica 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@sanktrobel2421
      hi S R...
      '
      who is a word - SHE -...
      where is she now

    • @sanktrobel2421
      @sanktrobel2421 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@bestamerica So you are telling me that she knows where she is at all times bc she knows where she isn't?

    • @adelaidejones2346
      @adelaidejones2346 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@sanktrobel2421 It could be because all MiG fighters since 1946 have been jet-powered? I'm not entirely sure if English is The Buzz's first language, as I've only just come across this channel, but it could be a slip of the tongue/ lost in translation. Everything in this video is pretty damn accurate otherwise - a mistake in one line doesn't discount the rest of the video.
      Although, I have a feeling I know why you're so angry about it...

    • @sanktrobel2421
      @sanktrobel2421 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@adelaidejones2346 Because she said it twice? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • @lonelybullet1
    @lonelybullet1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    MiG designs are so beautiful

  • @featheredserpentofthewest2049
    @featheredserpentofthewest2049 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Awesome! You always deliver great content. Thank you for noticing those request for the MiGs 😎😎😎

  • @Haecqal
    @Haecqal 4 ปีที่แล้ว +108

    Tupolev, Yakovlev, We love Russian plane....

    • @user-ds5ef4oy4y
      @user-ds5ef4oy4y 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Lavochkin, Messershmitt, Tank, no only russian

    • @Lxcx333
      @Lxcx333 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@user-ds5ef4oy4y *Messerschmitt

    • @user-ds5ef4oy4y
      @user-ds5ef4oy4y 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Lxcx333 russian pronouncing and english rules give sh
      Thank you

    • @timurtimur53
      @timurtimur53 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Antonov was Russian constructor Russia send him for making work place and industry upgrade in Ukraine tolmachov created an225 he was from kursk Russia build in Soviet republics institutes and industry upgrade .

    • @sergejx7261
      @sergejx7261 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@user-ds5ef4oy4y Чего несешь ? Messerschmitt - немецкая фирма. Какой еще английский ?

  • @overbank56
    @overbank56 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    It would have been nice to see the weapons details & power plant specifications displayed.

  • @GauravKumar-ep6ym
    @GauravKumar-ep6ym 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Mig 21 is an emotion 😇

  • @MarcAle07
    @MarcAle07 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Yeyyy, ROAF MIG-21 picture ! :))))

    • @LK911
      @LK911 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Балалайка

  • @tgsgardenmaintenance4627
    @tgsgardenmaintenance4627 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Fulcrum is a fantastic design aerodynamically but I do love the Foxhound, seen them at Monino and MAKS, and they are magnificent machines!

  • @nileshmohanty6369
    @nileshmohanty6369 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Great 😊

  • @thefuzzysheep3859
    @thefuzzysheep3859 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’ve always liked the yak fighters since playing iron aces as a kid. Man that game takes me back

  • @alcoyne3333333333333
    @alcoyne3333333333333 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks loved seeing that old magnificent legends

  • @CS_Mango
    @CS_Mango 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It makes sense to inude the altitude when talking about the speed. The mig 23 to my knowledge was not capable of reaching higher speeds than roughly mach 1.1 at sea level. But at 13000m it went up to 2300 km/h or roughly mach 2.3

  • @Sky_Ellie
    @Sky_Ellie 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The MiG-27 is an upgrade of the MiG-23, so there is no reason to list them in ascending order of number in the title.

    • @darthvader5558
      @darthvader5558 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes
      The engine , radar and tail design were changed and improved

  • @renatocamurca2713
    @renatocamurca2713 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    MiG 17 always been my favourite.

  • @MiKeMiDNiTe-77
    @MiKeMiDNiTe-77 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I love all the MiGs but the MiG 19 Farmer for me is one of the nicest looking aircraft ever for me it's the 57 Chevy of the Russian jets

    • @vens_USSR_19
      @vens_USSR_19 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why!? You like the design!?

    • @erzhaider
      @erzhaider 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vens_USSR_19 It´s absolutely beautiful. The single aircraft that can beat it is the A32 of the swedes

    • @sylamy7457
      @sylamy7457 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@erzhaider It was ahead of it's time. The mig 19 didnt serve long, but adopted the first modern jet body look.

    • @radosaworman7628
      @radosaworman7628 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sylamy7457 that's an x from me on first statement pal. It was a very conservative design (and contemproray thnologically f-100 was introduced like a year earlier. From design standpoint su-7 was more innovative with it's variable wing geometry ( lenght) and a cone accomodating proper radar. When it cones to esthetics it's my least favorite of all jets.

    • @xlotyliciux
      @xlotyliciux 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sylamy7457 The Chinese copy, Shenyang F-6, actually served into the 21st century (retired PAF 2002). North Korea probably still has many examples mothballed although their F-5 (Chinese copy of MiG-17) is far less cost/labor intensive for regular training/propaganda purposes. Most abundant Russian "made" aircraft in North Korean service is MiG-23 - MiG-21 and earlier, they have mostly Chinese copies.

  • @RikthDcruze
    @RikthDcruze 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    MiG21 my love ♥️ I wish I was a fighter pilot..., just to fly the MiG-21

    • @devendra_singh_rathore
      @devendra_singh_rathore 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mig 21 Bison of IAF?

    • @ioaniorgu5662
      @ioaniorgu5662 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Try DCS MiG-21!

    • @devendra_singh_rathore
      @devendra_singh_rathore 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ioaniorgu5662 DCS means?

    • @davidmcmichael8843
      @davidmcmichael8843 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Dorito chip wing!

    • @t65bx25
      @t65bx25 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@devendra_singh_rathore Digital Combat Sim. It’s hyper-realistic video game, real pilots play it when they’re on break and some air forces have been rumored to use it for pilot training.

  • @featheredserpentofthewest2049
    @featheredserpentofthewest2049 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    There she is!! 🙌🏾😎🙌🏾❤

    • @bestamerica
      @bestamerica 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      hi S P...
      '
      who is a word - SHE -...
      where is she now

  • @miikatapanimatiastuhkiaine4057
    @miikatapanimatiastuhkiaine4057 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I know I'm repeating the same message here but, MiG-1 and MiG-3 weren't jet fighters. And no, you don't call a propeller-driven fighter a jet fighter, simply because it is a fighter aircraft.

    • @yves3560
      @yves3560 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh c´mon, the kid did a good job. Yes they´re props, so what...

  • @drjorgeluiz
    @drjorgeluiz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    "Jet fighters" ok, and what about the propeller of the mig-1 and mig-3?

    • @louisleedham3422
      @louisleedham3422 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's the evolution of the jet fighter. When we talk about the evolution of humanity we include fish and monkeys :P Unless your religious of course lol

    • @Et-chan
      @Et-chan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Louis Leedham but you call the fish fish and the monkeys monkeys. You don’t call the species that came before us humans too

    • @b3gabriel66
      @b3gabriel66 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Et-chan of course not humans are related to them not evolve from them all these species are reletaed to an ancient ape

    • @Et-chan
      @Et-chan 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      B3TAGabriel no? All organisms ancestrally started off in the ocean. While that doesn’t technically classify them as fish the evolution generally went fish -> monkey -> human. Skipping a bunch of stuff in between. But my point still stands. The ancestry of something is not called the same name as it’s descendant.

    • @vens_USSR_19
      @vens_USSR_19 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      - Granny... - You got that right!!! Be sure that your health are okay!!! I am starting to worry about you!!! Do you taking your pills course now!?

  • @nikelinq2899
    @nikelinq2899 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Ah yes, Em Em is my favorite form of measurement

  • @sanskarkumar6484
    @sanskarkumar6484 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice video❤❤

  • @chopperking007
    @chopperking007 4 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    It amazes me that the russians can make the most advanced aircraft , spacecraft and weaponry but have never been able to make a decent family car...

    • @naff9n435
      @naff9n435 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well... Recently Someone made fully working batman car, complete with the armaments in Russia

    • @DrillEntertainmentNetwork
      @DrillEntertainmentNetwork 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      priorities

    • @figurativeride2258
      @figurativeride2258 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Hey,su-27 is a good family car

    • @mitri5389
      @mitri5389 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      probably the same reason the germans cant make a reliable car

    • @aguilayserpiente
      @aguilayserpiente 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Gaz, Volga, Lada www.vortexmag.net/en/soviet-cars-6-brands-that-made-history-in-the-soviet-union/#:~:text=3.-,Lada,was%20known%20as%20a%20Zhiguli.

  • @serenyarrr
    @serenyarrr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you, I built these beautiful planes.

    • @louisleedham3422
      @louisleedham3422 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'll take 2 please!

    • @ayushades
      @ayushades 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@louisleedham3422 😂

  • @omigaikwad5936
    @omigaikwad5936 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Universal truth is " Flying objects with Propeller aren't Jet!! "

    • @xlotyliciux
      @xlotyliciux 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Equally true is, according to the specifically stated title of the video, jet fighters did not just appear out of thin air: they EVOLVED from earlier aircraft.

  • @romank4905
    @romank4905 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    The image of Mig-3 has clearly been rotated by 180 degrees since the title on the side of the aircraft is a mirror image of the word "Родина" (Motherland). I fully understand why you had to rotate some of the images though.

    • @otyliciu
      @otyliciu 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Good eye :-)

    • @grigol101
      @grigol101 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      "За Родину", если быть точным.

  • @icewaterslim7260
    @icewaterslim7260 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Big respect for the 17. Dueling with our best stuff over a decade older than. Maneuvering little cannon killer with a good pilot. I think more than one reason the 21s in 'Nam hit and ran and left the 17s to fight..

    • @UncleHoCM
      @UncleHoCM ปีที่แล้ว

      Ikr, with no missiles.

  • @wenbo595
    @wenbo595 ปีที่แล้ว

    One of my favorites

  • @electronicallyscannedarray
    @electronicallyscannedarray ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The brute looking MiG-25 Foxbat.

  • @MarioEsquivel
    @MarioEsquivel ปีที่แล้ว

    My favourite is MiG 28 which appears in topgun 1 but i didn´t see it in this video

  • @one-metallica4156
    @one-metallica4156 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very impressive aircraft.

  • @Moxie_278
    @Moxie_278 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    yes the mig15 uti in the thumbnail is a mig 9

  • @ashleyoasis7948
    @ashleyoasis7948 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    i hate when they cut out numbers from numerical order and go from 1,2,56,84,89 😂

  • @take-off7812
    @take-off7812 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    It's like MiG-15UTI (double-seat combat-training version of MiG-15) with Polish Air Forces markings

    • @hansschmotke6060
      @hansschmotke6060 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because it is Polish MiG-15UTI )) They made an error in the video!

    • @Barabel22
      @Barabel22 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hans Schmotke They made LOTS of errors in this video. Should be getting A LOT more then just 10% downvotes.

  • @Ropen_
    @Ropen_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    AH YES MY FAVOURITE AFTERBURNER ENGINE JET THE MIG 3

    • @xlotyliciux
      @xlotyliciux 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Of course, because jet aircraft were developed from scratch and did not "evolve," as per the very specifically worded title of the video, from earlier aircraft.

  • @ap_astrix
    @ap_astrix 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Ive gotten 3 ads, first was for World of Warships, second was for Reeses Chocolate, and last was War Thunder.
    One is not like the others.

    • @louisleedham3422
      @louisleedham3422 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The laws of targeted ads tell me you are angry with a sweet tooth! lol

  • @destroyerstar5674
    @destroyerstar5674 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    2 questions:
    On title, why do MiG-1/3 have jet flames?!
    How about MiG-15bis?Also The MiG-15 shown here is Polish modyfied one, not original one

    • @romank4905
      @romank4905 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I guess it's Mig-15 Uti, a twin-seat fighter-trainer. And speaking about Bis, isn't it just a variant ? Then we would have ended up with all the variants of Mig-23, Mig-27, Mig-29 as well, and those are really really lot of. It would have been quite a burden for the author and quite a bore for the audience. And the flames... I don't see any

    • @nicholasjanosy2214
      @nicholasjanosy2214 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      To roast wieners.

  • @newwarrior1581
    @newwarrior1581 ปีที่แล้ว

    My Favourite Aircraft is Mig 25 Foxbat and Mig 35 !!!

  • @user-tj8fm4uf4n
    @user-tj8fm4uf4n 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Нам разум дал стальные руки -крылья!

  • @palwinder_kaler
    @palwinder_kaler 4 ปีที่แล้ว +75

    Russian planes are just like russian girls.... Hot, perfect,beautiful ,elegant but extremely dangerous

    • @Pussilover56
      @Pussilover56 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You've seen enough Hollywood movies. Russian girls are affectionate and malleable and believe any bullshit you put in her ears.

    • @tomkrueger6556
      @tomkrueger6556 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Pussilover56 hahahahahha xD

    • @mrcrown6191
      @mrcrown6191 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hee hee, you're right)

    • @St.Matthew422
      @St.Matthew422 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Pussilover56 no, never bruh

    • @TotRuAv0015
      @TotRuAv0015 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ummm... ikr

  • @AliKhan-sj3qp
    @AliKhan-sj3qp 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Make a video on fighter jets pilots who destroyed most jets in 10 minutes.

  • @darkknightbatman8269
    @darkknightbatman8269 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    What about mig-7 (i-225)??

  • @negativeone7151
    @negativeone7151 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "In the previous video, we've shown you guys the evo-ilyushin..."

    • @gruzza9000
      @gruzza9000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hahaha dad jokes be rolling out

  • @thetoanlam124
    @thetoanlam124 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    😎 MiG 41 Number one 100 year!...🤩 💪💪💪

  • @mustafaemirtercan5722
    @mustafaemirtercan5722 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you should add mig 41 to the list so MiG-41 as a 5 ++ or 6th generation project

  • @user-wd4qs4zs3c
    @user-wd4qs4zs3c ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Отличный обзор!👍 Ждём Миг 41!

  • @lorenandre63
    @lorenandre63 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can they be used as unman decoys while using artillery?

  • @otyliciu
    @otyliciu 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    The MiG-21 might well out last most on the list in terms of remaining in active service. With modern technology becoming more compact, you do not need a 'larger' aircraft to have more power as was the trend for several design generations. Modern upgrades and rebuilds (MiG-21-2000 etc.) enable it to carry modern sensors and the latest in both Russian and western armament, making the MiG-21 a pseudo fourth gen' in terms of its capabilities (largely eliminating the incentive for current MiG-21 operators to buy entirely new aircraft to replace it).

    • @nrdy8221
      @nrdy8221 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      obviously? do you think the russian airforce would use yak 9s?

    • @otyliciu
      @otyliciu 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@nrdy8221 Well, I did say "current MiG-21 operators" didn't I? A lot of its current operators wouldn't have even been able to afford the MiG-21 on their own except that large numbers were written of by the Russian Air Force and left with the various Soviet Socialist Republics in which they'd been based after the dissolution of the U.S.S.R. Those operators will likely be keeping their MiG-21 flying, through upgrades, for decades whereas the aircraft types in developed nations' service with continue to evolve. So, yes, the MiG-21 will probably out last many later aircraft in terms of how long it remains in active service "somewhere" in the world. Due to sanctions preventing the delivery of new military technology to Franco's regime, Spain was still flying the Messerschmidt Bf-109 as late as 1965.

    • @darthvader5558
      @darthvader5558 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      There is more
      In 2019 a Indian Mig21 shot down a Pakistani f16
      😎 damn this mig 21 is such a legend

  • @AniMageNeBy
    @AniMageNeBy ปีที่แล้ว

    The nomenclature made sense up until Mig-31... then it jumped to Mig-35... Where did the Mig-33 go to?

  • @hawker131
    @hawker131 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love the jet fighter b17 I know it’s not a MiG but still

  • @lorenandre63
    @lorenandre63 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can the older ones not in used be turned into an unmanned disposable bomber?

  • @Raage.
    @Raage. 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The mig 21 looks so cool

  • @mohamedmohamud9691
    @mohamedmohamud9691 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How about the Mig 41 which we hear has already been produced, or is it just hearsay?

  • @mileristic2084
    @mileristic2084 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    First Modern MiG-29 , MiG-31 , MiG-35 , next it's SECRET PROJECT MiG-141 ... flaying in space and back ... pilot MileR 001 ...

  • @mardikermardiker8514
    @mardikermardiker8514 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What's the difference between MiG 35 and MiG 29?

  • @calmcometsuop5746
    @calmcometsuop5746 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    My favourite type of plane

  • @savvaavdonin5925
    @savvaavdonin5925 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Why are you putting MiG-15UTI instead of MiG-15 at 2:40?

  • @thailand6989
    @thailand6989 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The owner of the channel is very beautiful.

    • @brucewelty7684
      @brucewelty7684 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      piss poor announcing voice though

  • @barbadolid5170
    @barbadolid5170 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    When the accountant gets to do the thumbnail...

  • @MrWtonckens
    @MrWtonckens 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about the MiG 28? I've missed that one.

  • @mdzanurirazali4856
    @mdzanurirazali4856 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mig 21 super evergreen.. Great jet All time

  • @jimig.688
    @jimig.688 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice propeller jet fighter you got there

    • @xlotyliciux
      @xlotyliciux 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      ...because, naturally, all jet aircraft "evolved" (as per the specific wording of the title) from gliders.

  • @colebiggs7296
    @colebiggs7296 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Isn’t the mig 9 in the thumb nail a 2 seater mig15?

  • @martinkovski5704
    @martinkovski5704 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    For me WW2 planes and tanks were much better than today's jets, tanks etc.

  • @marcussv661
    @marcussv661 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you - !!! and N - 1 SU - 57 - !!!!

  • @hinakotakami3463
    @hinakotakami3463 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I remember a lot of MIG planes when I was in Syria

  • @bushyfromoz8834
    @bushyfromoz8834 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hope the video quality gets better than the thumbnail

  • @tanvirrahman8122
    @tanvirrahman8122 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Mig 21 and 29 are the best .

  • @lorenandre63
    @lorenandre63 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can these older migs be refitted and armed for unman flights and used as missiles?

  • @timothyimmanuel570
    @timothyimmanuel570 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    wrong why is the mig 1 and the mig 3 has jet afterburner behind them ?

  • @logannally9660
    @logannally9660 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Man it’s almost like the propellers in the cover don’t do anything

  • @aspireautomobile6315
    @aspireautomobile6315 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So , were the propellers of mig 1 and mig 3 there just to confuse germans ?

  • @zoranstojkovic9560
    @zoranstojkovic9560 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mig 21 is a GOAT!
    PROVED IN COMBAT A TRUE LEGEND!!!!

  • @user-pk2ht2me2v
    @user-pk2ht2me2v 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    MiG-25/maximum speed - 2171mph/3500 kph

  • @Surferman29
    @Surferman29 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think the person that wrote the script didn't know what a jet engine is.

  • @donataskervelis1009
    @donataskervelis1009 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    17 is the most beautiful machine

  • @marcoschivico11
    @marcoschivico11 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Love the voice...!!!

  • @an4rey459
    @an4rey459 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    music?

  • @andrikurniawan6459
    @andrikurniawan6459 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing
    Allahumma shali wa salim wa barikh ala Sayyidina Muhammadin wa'ala ali Sayyidina Muhammadin fil awwalin wal akhirin wa fil mala'il a'la ila Yaumiddin

  • @stephentyas4698
    @stephentyas4698 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What do the numbers mean?

  • @sparnglbarngl7244
    @sparnglbarngl7244 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes, because the MiG-15 is named the MiG-9
    Edit: I mean in the thumbnail

  • @axonoxa
    @axonoxa 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    why do you read millimeters as mm

  • @potatoplayz3018
    @potatoplayz3018 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    yakovlev series next?

  • @lorenzo9895_
    @lorenzo9895_ ปีที่แล้ว

    why is there a picture of a mig 15 labelled as mig 9 on the thumbnail

  • @spinch1638
    @spinch1638 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Я работал на заводе МИГ.
    I worked at the MIG plant.

  • @user-zt2do5ft9d
    @user-zt2do5ft9d ปีที่แล้ว

    عمل ممتاز لكم الشكر الجزيل
    الرجاء الترجمة بالعربية

  • @Newdivide
    @Newdivide 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mig 9 never saw combat because it faces a lot of issues mostly with the engines

  • @machdaddy6451
    @machdaddy6451 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about the Mig 28?

  • @louisleedham3422
    @louisleedham3422 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Brilliant video - I just wish you had included the NATO reporting names! :)