Mine are the later ones with turbofan engines. Amazing that Mig managed to get its propellerless jet fighters to run on airliner engines! They must have been several em ems big.
A thing that many do not know: In practice all western fighers nowadays have ability to use pilot helmet HUDs and lock a target just by looking into it. This is considered a new feature however, "first seen" at the 2010s. However, the MiG-29 had both features already when it was commissioned, though the locking only worked with the R-27, which was a poorly working fail missile.
The MiG-25 is an astonishing bird. A jet figther developed over 50 years ago capable of Mach 3 and its still able to outrun the vast majority of modern fighters.
@@KillerSniper55 Interceptors of the time were built specifically for speed, ceiling, and rate of climb at the expense of all other concerns. Midair refueling was in its absolute infancy and purebred interceptors, defending home air space, could reliably be sure that they'd only be flying to counter high altitude supersonic bomber threats. Irony is, the U.S. believed the MiG-25, in development, to be an aircraft more like the Su-27. The U.S. developed the F-15 in response, resulting in the Soviets developing the actual Su-27.
It needs to be fast in order to run away when F-15 or F-16s show up. The MiG-25 was developed to intercept the SR-71 and failed every time. It is an interceptor that has done very little intercepting. It's a good-looking plane, no doubt.
@@KillerSniper55 no actually it had a lot more issues than that, the MiG-25 was a very ineffective aircraft. Sure it could go Mach 3+ but only for a couple minutes max, and it would cause permanent damage to the engine and airframe, the engine usually had to be replaced once they landed. It also did not have the fuel capacity to work well, even going at a low cruising speed, it had a very low range. Not to mention that it turned like a boat.
@@MESSI13573 Well yes but my man I'm not taking about the 5th-Gen F22 Raptor I'm taking about the Pakistani F16 Block 15 (80's model + it didn't have the complete F16 weapons package) which was chased and and shot down by an Indian MIG 21 BISON (UPG standard upgraded, this upgrade gave the MIG 21a better Radar, avionics, upgraded cockpit etc and enabled it to use air-to-to missiles from the MIG 29's arsenal)
@@sanktrobel2421 It could be because all MiG fighters since 1946 have been jet-powered? I'm not entirely sure if English is The Buzz's first language, as I've only just come across this channel, but it could be a slip of the tongue/ lost in translation. Everything in this video is pretty damn accurate otherwise - a mistake in one line doesn't discount the rest of the video. Although, I have a feeling I know why you're so angry about it...
Some side notes to the video : 1) as you see there were no more piston-engined fighters after Mig-3. This is due to the fact that Mig-3 was overspecialised as a high-altitude interceptor, and was a relatively poor dogfighter. Throughout WW2 the Soviets have been very confined in resources, so the decision was made to abandon production and development of Migs and focus on that of Ilyushin IL-2 ground attack and Yakovlev Yak-3 fighter aircraft. 2) Mig-9 and Mig-15 have been developed and built when the Soviet jet engine R&D was in its infancy. Mig-9 engine was based on the reverse engineered BMW engines captured from the defeated Nazi Germany, and Mig-15 engine was based on Rolls Royce Nene engine purchased from the UK. 3) Mig-15 was developed with the threat of American B-29 bombers in mind, so it was optimised for shooting down large and tough aircraft (the use of 37mm cannon). As a side effect, it had a slightly poorer shooting accuracy than that of its counterpart, F-86 Sabre. 4) The picture of Mig-15 actually depicts Mig-15 Uti, the twin-seated trainer version of Mig-15. 5) Mig-27 is based on the same platform as Mig-23, in fact, it has originally been developed as a variant of Mig-23. 6) An interesting feature of Mig-23 and Mig-27 is a foldable ventral fin, which increases directional stability at high speed. 7) Mig-29 was actually never intended to counter F-15, Sukhoi Su-27 was. Mig-29 is a light fighter and was meant to fulfil the same role as F-16.
The MiG-29 wasn't designed to fufil the same role as the F-16. That's another myth. The MiG-29 was designed as a short range interceptor aircraft directed by ground controllers. The F-16 was designed as a cost effective, lightweight multi role air superiority fighter and ground strike aircraft.
Babs Rahman you are clearly confusing it with Mig-25. Please go read Mig-29 design history. It was designed based on “Advanced Frontline Fighter” specification and acquired mostly by Soviet VVS (air force) and not PVO (air defence force). The plane was integrated with helmet mounted sights and dogfight missiles. Does such armament make any sense for an interceptor?
@@romank4905 My terminology was misleading. The MiG-29 is an air superiority fighter but its role was that of a short range frontline fighter jet guided by GCI, fire off its R-27 and then return to base. But it could also dogfight with its HMD, R-77 missiles and cannon should the need arise. Compared to the F-16, the MiG-29 had a shorter range and inferior situational awareness. It wasn't a datalinked multirole fighter jet like the F-16, at least not originally. They have different roles. My original point was that the MiG-29 and F-16 are not like each other, they had different missions. F-16 suited US offensive air warfare doctrine. The MiG-29 was a defensive fighter, guided by ground control to intercept incoming NATO aircraft. The F-15 and Su-27 were similar though.
@@gruzza9000 obviously, the main space plane that the commies were gonna send up there was the Po-2 since it has the best zero gravity performance(may or may not have been tested)
Antonov was Russian constructor Russia send him for making work place and industry upgrade in Ukraine tolmachov created an225 he was from kursk Russia build in Soviet republics institutes and industry upgrade .
I like MIG-25 Foxbat and MIG-29 Fulcrum most. MIG-25 was developed to stop American Blackbirds from intercepting and it was very successful. It used to be called the iron fist of the Soviets. Then comes MIG-29 which is such a legendary fighter. When Germany was reunited, some of the Fulcrums from East Germany took part in NATO manoeuvres and used to outperform the best American fighters (e.g. F-15 Eagle). Yeah...that's the way it was
B3TAGabriel no? All organisms ancestrally started off in the ocean. While that doesn’t technically classify them as fish the evolution generally went fish -> monkey -> human. Skipping a bunch of stuff in between. But my point still stands. The ancestry of something is not called the same name as it’s descendant.
I know I'm repeating the same message here but, MiG-1 and MiG-3 weren't jet fighters. And no, you don't call a propeller-driven fighter a jet fighter, simply because it is a fighter aircraft.
@@sylamy7457 that's an x from me on first statement pal. It was a very conservative design (and contemproray thnologically f-100 was introduced like a year earlier. From design standpoint su-7 was more innovative with it's variable wing geometry ( lenght) and a cone accomodating proper radar. When it cones to esthetics it's my least favorite of all jets.
@@sylamy7457 The Chinese copy, Shenyang F-6, actually served into the 21st century (retired PAF 2002). North Korea probably still has many examples mothballed although their F-5 (Chinese copy of MiG-17) is far less cost/labor intensive for regular training/propaganda purposes. Most abundant Russian "made" aircraft in North Korean service is MiG-23 - MiG-21 and earlier, they have mostly Chinese copies.
It makes sense to inude the altitude when talking about the speed. The mig 23 to my knowledge was not capable of reaching higher speeds than roughly mach 1.1 at sea level. But at 13000m it went up to 2300 km/h or roughly mach 2.3
@@devendra_singh_rathore Digital Combat Sim. It’s hyper-realistic video game, real pilots play it when they’re on break and some air forces have been rumored to use it for pilot training.
The image of Mig-3 has clearly been rotated by 180 degrees since the title on the side of the aircraft is a mirror image of the word "Родина" (Motherland). I fully understand why you had to rotate some of the images though.
I love seeing the cockpit view when they fly in formation, you can't appreciate how much work is going jnto not crashing into each other from the ground but when you see the cockpit view its a whole different story hahaha
Big respect for the 17. Dueling with our best stuff over a decade older than. Maneuvering little cannon killer with a good pilot. I think more than one reason the 21s in 'Nam hit and ran and left the 17s to fight..
@@A-G-F- Not exactly ... level flight capability is pretty crucial as it takes a much greater amount of energy to simply break the sound barrier (e.g. mach 0.9 to 1.1) than it does to, say, accelerate from mach 1.3 to 1.5. In passing the sound barrier, all those sound waves build in front of the aircraft ... creating a spike in resistance to overcome (a real physical barrier of sorts). A plane that can break mach 1 in level flight can then-maintain that speed much more efficiently as it won't be pushing all of those sound waves in front.
Equally true is, according to the specifically stated title of the video, jet fighters did not just appear out of thin air: they EVOLVED from earlier aircraft.
I guess it's Mig-15 Uti, a twin-seat fighter-trainer. And speaking about Bis, isn't it just a variant ? Then we would have ended up with all the variants of Mig-23, Mig-27, Mig-29 as well, and those are really really lot of. It would have been quite a burden for the author and quite a bore for the audience. And the flames... I don't see any
The MiG-21 might well out last most on the list in terms of remaining in active service. With modern technology becoming more compact, you do not need a 'larger' aircraft to have more power as was the trend for several design generations. Modern upgrades and rebuilds (MiG-21-2000 etc.) enable it to carry modern sensors and the latest in both Russian and western armament, making the MiG-21 a pseudo fourth gen' in terms of its capabilities (largely eliminating the incentive for current MiG-21 operators to buy entirely new aircraft to replace it).
@@nrdy8221 Well, I did say "current MiG-21 operators" didn't I? A lot of its current operators wouldn't have even been able to afford the MiG-21 on their own except that large numbers were written of by the Russian Air Force and left with the various Soviet Socialist Republics in which they'd been based after the dissolution of the U.S.S.R. Those operators will likely be keeping their MiG-21 flying, through upgrades, for decades whereas the aircraft types in developed nations' service with continue to evolve. So, yes, the MiG-21 will probably out last many later aircraft in terms of how long it remains in active service "somewhere" in the world. Due to sanctions preventing the delivery of new military technology to Franco's regime, Spain was still flying the Messerschmidt Bf-109 as late as 1965.
Of course, because jet aircraft were developed from scratch and did not "evolve," as per the very specifically worded title of the video, from earlier aircraft.
Hollywood weren't completely stupid, however: they knew that MiG always applied odd number designations (i.e. they knew a MiG-28 would never be a misrepresentation of any real MiG aircraft).
I LOVE YOUR VOICE. MY FAVORITE MIGS FROM OLD TIMES ARE THE MIG 21 AND THE MIG 25 GREAT PLANES AND THE MIG 25 IS STILL IN USE. EXCELLENT RUSSIAN PLANES. GREAT VIDEO. THANKS.
yeah, she also included the Foxbat which is not in its name that is what nato called it when it first came out because they didn't know whether it was a fighter or bomber. makes me feel like a lot of the data is wrong. not a good sign.
A mig 25 looks remarkably similar to a mig 31. The main difference between the airframes on the ground are larger road wheels for the mig 25, other differences are internal in nature
The title specifically states "evolution" of the jet fighter. Not every aircraft from which the first generation jets were derived were, themselves, jet fighters.
Amazing Allahumma shali wa salim wa barikh ala Sayyidina Muhammadin wa'ala ali Sayyidina Muhammadin fil awwalin wal akhirin wa fil mala'il a'la ila Yaumiddin
@@tommcglone2867 Only liability is the AA-6 missile was, like the AIM-54, a large high-yield weapon designed with massive 'bomber' targets in mind. It wasn't the kind of missile you'd expect to be able to catch a high agility fighter in the midst of conducting evasive maneuvers.
Could not fly Mach 3 without damaging its engines. By the time you got to M2.8 at 35000 feet, you were out of fuel. Could not sustain speeds above M2.4 for any amount of time without warping its flimsy aluminum skin. Radar was so labor-intensive, a pilot was not able to properly fly the plane, simultaniously. In other words, a big, flying shitball.
@@Pussilover56 Каждый понимает на столько, на сколько ему позволяет образование. Покойничек это как раз ты, потому-что ты уже похоронил свою безликую сущность 😂
@@_Baccap_ Сходи в американский Гугл на американском компьютeре и проверь на гугловский карте, в каком месте мира находится Советский Союз? Но если у тебя нет Гугла то я тебе скажу словами, Покойничек, Советский Союз находится в аду.
@@Pussilover56 Ну я же и говорю насколько интеллекта хватает, настолько и тупое мышление ...😂😂😂 -... какой-то ад в голове вообще ... В дальнейшей никчёмной переписке не вижу никакого смысла. Американец Юрий🤣🤣🤣
So after the MIG-25 they started to go slower and have less range until 11 years later with the MIG-31 which was again able to reach the top speed and range.
The MiG-31, while not as fast as the MiG-25, did not suffer all that great a "loss" of speed considering its primary mission changed completely. It is no longer concerned primarily with the threat of non-existent mach 3-capable bombers (XB-70) but rather, with its AESA radar, radar/weapons operator, and look-down/shoot-down capability (allowing it to see terrain-skimming targets even directly below it...a blind spot to most aircrafts' sensors), is tasked with the interception of submarine-launched cruise missile attacks coming in from the vast expanses of Russia's ice-locked North.
Ah yes, my favourite jet fighters, the MiG-1 and MiG-3
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Jet fighter?
Mine are the later ones with turbofan engines. Amazing that Mig managed to get its propellerless jet fighters to run on airliner engines! They must have been several em ems big.
My favorite jet fighter is the Bf 109.
lmao im dying here
Poor Gurevich, you completely left him out.
Mikoyan, one of my favorite fighter jet manufacturers of all time
Especially the Mig-29
A thing that many do not know:
In practice all western fighers nowadays have ability to use pilot helmet HUDs and lock a target just by looking into it. This is considered a new feature however, "first seen" at the 2010s.
However, the MiG-29 had both features already when it was commissioned, though the locking only worked with the R-27, which was a poorly working fail missile.
But still impressive
The MiG-25 is an astonishing bird. A jet figther developed over 50 years ago capable of Mach 3 and its still able to outrun the vast majority of modern fighters.
only issue was its turning circle was the size of the US.
@@KillerSniper55 pretty much all the interceptors suffered from that
@@KillerSniper55 Interceptors of the time were built specifically for speed, ceiling, and rate of climb at the expense of all other concerns. Midair refueling was in its absolute infancy and purebred interceptors, defending home air space, could reliably be sure that they'd only be flying to counter high altitude supersonic bomber threats. Irony is, the U.S. believed the MiG-25, in development, to be an aircraft more like the Su-27. The U.S. developed the F-15 in response, resulting in the Soviets developing the actual Su-27.
It needs to be fast in order to run away when F-15 or F-16s show up.
The MiG-25 was developed to intercept the SR-71 and failed every time.
It is an interceptor that has done very little intercepting.
It's a good-looking plane, no doubt.
@@KillerSniper55 no actually it had a lot more issues than that, the MiG-25 was a very ineffective aircraft. Sure it could go Mach 3+ but only for a couple minutes max, and it would cause permanent damage to the engine and airframe, the engine usually had to be replaced once they landed. It also did not have the fuel capacity to work well, even going at a low cruising speed, it had a very low range. Not to mention that it turned like a boat.
MIG-17 and MIG-21 were legendary fighters of the 20th century!
Vietnamese pilots flying MIG-21 shot down B-52 in 1972 in Hanoi
There is more
In 2019 a Indian Mig21 shot down a Pakistani f16
😎 damn this mig 21 is such a legend
@@darthvader5558mig 21 was a legend
If the safety issues were revised then it might be the best one
@@darthvader5558if it was against the F22 Nah the mig21 won't survive bro
@@MESSI13573 Well yes but my man I'm not taking about the 5th-Gen F22 Raptor
I'm taking about the Pakistani F16 Block 15 (80's model + it didn't have the complete F16 weapons package) which was chased and and shot down by an Indian MIG 21 BISON (UPG standard upgraded, this upgrade gave the MIG 21a better Radar, avionics, upgraded cockpit etc and enabled it to use air-to-to missiles from the MIG 29's arsenal)
Is anyone gonna talk about how the MiG-15 on the thumbnail is labeled as a MiG-9
She doesn’t know what she’s talking about :/
Or how the video says the mig15 is faster than it actually was by about 100km/h.
Ohh I saw that comment too late
And she is saying that the mig 17 has an afterburner
Some variants of the MiG-17 had an afterburner, like the MiG-17F or the Chinese produced Shenyang F-5
Why do you call the piston engine equipped MIG-1 one for a jet fighter????
Bc she has no clue what she is talking about. This is completely Fubar.
@@sanktrobel2421
hi S R...
'
who is a word - SHE -...
where is she now
@@bestamerica So you are telling me that she knows where she is at all times bc she knows where she isn't?
@@sanktrobel2421 It could be because all MiG fighters since 1946 have been jet-powered? I'm not entirely sure if English is The Buzz's first language, as I've only just come across this channel, but it could be a slip of the tongue/ lost in translation. Everything in this video is pretty damn accurate otherwise - a mistake in one line doesn't discount the rest of the video.
Although, I have a feeling I know why you're so angry about it...
@@adelaidejones2346 Because she said it twice? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Good Wikipedia read. Love to see the MiG-3 Jet fighters and the non descript models for which you got the statistics for
yeah dude found that myself too, I was just looking for some images
Some side notes to the video : 1) as you see there were no more piston-engined fighters after Mig-3. This is due to the fact that Mig-3 was overspecialised as a high-altitude interceptor, and was a relatively poor dogfighter. Throughout WW2 the Soviets have been very confined in resources, so the decision was made to abandon production and development of Migs and focus on that of Ilyushin IL-2 ground attack and Yakovlev Yak-3 fighter aircraft. 2) Mig-9 and Mig-15 have been developed and built when the Soviet jet engine R&D was in its infancy. Mig-9 engine was based on the reverse engineered BMW engines captured from the defeated Nazi Germany, and Mig-15 engine was based on Rolls Royce Nene engine purchased from the UK. 3) Mig-15 was developed with the threat of American B-29 bombers in mind, so it was optimised for shooting down large and tough aircraft (the use of 37mm cannon). As a side effect, it had a slightly poorer shooting accuracy than that of its counterpart, F-86 Sabre. 4) The picture of Mig-15 actually depicts Mig-15 Uti, the twin-seated trainer version of Mig-15. 5) Mig-27 is based on the same platform as Mig-23, in fact, it has originally been developed as a variant of Mig-23. 6) An interesting feature of Mig-23 and Mig-27 is a foldable ventral fin, which increases directional stability at high speed. 7) Mig-29 was actually never intended to counter F-15, Sukhoi Su-27 was. Mig-29 is a light fighter and was meant to fulfil the same role as F-16.
The MiG-29 wasn't designed to fufil the same role as the F-16. That's another myth.
The MiG-29 was designed as a short range interceptor aircraft directed by ground controllers.
The F-16 was designed as a cost effective, lightweight multi role air superiority fighter and ground strike aircraft.
Babs Rahman you are clearly confusing it with Mig-25. Please go read Mig-29 design history. It was designed based on “Advanced Frontline Fighter” specification and acquired mostly by Soviet VVS (air force) and not PVO (air defence force). The plane was integrated with helmet mounted sights and dogfight missiles. Does such armament make any sense for an interceptor?
@@romank4905 My terminology was misleading. The MiG-29 is an air superiority fighter but its role was that of a short range frontline fighter jet guided by GCI, fire off its R-27 and then return to base. But it could also dogfight with its HMD, R-77 missiles and cannon should the need arise.
Compared to the F-16, the MiG-29 had a shorter range and inferior situational awareness. It wasn't a datalinked multirole fighter jet like the F-16, at least not originally. They have different roles.
My original point was that the MiG-29 and F-16 are not like each other, they had different missions. F-16 suited US offensive air warfare doctrine. The MiG-29 was a defensive fighter, guided by ground control to intercept incoming NATO aircraft.
The F-15 and Su-27 were similar though.
Yqll nerds , mig 29 is a spce craft , meant to take communism to mars and stalinate the solar system
Duh
@@gruzza9000 obviously, the main space plane that the commies were gonna send up there was the Po-2 since it has the best zero gravity performance(may or may not have been tested)
Sukhoi : *develops supermanueverability against missiles
Migs : Lulz *speeds up
Tupolev, Yakovlev, We love Russian plane....
Lavochkin, Messershmitt, Tank, no only russian
@@Мировойчеловек-в3г *Messerschmitt
@@Lxcx311 russian pronouncing and english rules give sh
Thank you
Antonov was Russian constructor Russia send him for making work place and industry upgrade in Ukraine tolmachov created an225 he was from kursk Russia build in Soviet republics institutes and industry upgrade .
@@Мировойчеловек-в3г Чего несешь ? Messerschmitt - немецкая фирма. Какой еще английский ?
I like MIG-25 Foxbat and MIG-29 Fulcrum most. MIG-25 was developed to stop American Blackbirds from intercepting and it was very successful. It used to be called the iron fist of the Soviets. Then comes MIG-29 which is such a legendary fighter. When Germany was reunited, some of the Fulcrums from East Germany took part in NATO manoeuvres and used to outperform the best American fighters (e.g. F-15 Eagle). Yeah...that's the way it was
Top technology, respect and congratulations....!!
MiG designs are so beautiful
The MiG-27 is an upgrade of the MiG-23, so there is no reason to list them in ascending order of number in the title.
Yes
The engine , radar and tail design were changed and improved
Awesome! You always deliver great content. Thank you for noticing those request for the MiGs 😎😎😎
Yeyyy, ROAF MIG-21 picture ! :))))
Балалайка
It would have been nice to see the weapons details & power plant specifications displayed.
Mig 21 is an emotion 😇
"Jet fighters" ok, and what about the propeller of the mig-1 and mig-3?
It's the evolution of the jet fighter. When we talk about the evolution of humanity we include fish and monkeys :P Unless your religious of course lol
Louis Leedham but you call the fish fish and the monkeys monkeys. You don’t call the species that came before us humans too
@@Et-chan of course not humans are related to them not evolve from them all these species are reletaed to an ancient ape
B3TAGabriel no? All organisms ancestrally started off in the ocean. While that doesn’t technically classify them as fish the evolution generally went fish -> monkey -> human. Skipping a bunch of stuff in between. But my point still stands. The ancestry of something is not called the same name as it’s descendant.
- Granny... - You got that right!!! Be sure that your health are okay!!! I am starting to worry about you!!! Do you taking your pills course now!?
I know I'm repeating the same message here but, MiG-1 and MiG-3 weren't jet fighters. And no, you don't call a propeller-driven fighter a jet fighter, simply because it is a fighter aircraft.
Oh c´mon, the kid did a good job. Yes they´re props, so what...
I love all the MiGs but the MiG 19 Farmer for me is one of the nicest looking aircraft ever for me it's the 57 Chevy of the Russian jets
Why!? You like the design!?
@@vens_USSR_19 It´s absolutely beautiful. The single aircraft that can beat it is the A32 of the swedes
@@erzhaider It was ahead of it's time. The mig 19 didnt serve long, but adopted the first modern jet body look.
@@sylamy7457 that's an x from me on first statement pal. It was a very conservative design (and contemproray thnologically f-100 was introduced like a year earlier. From design standpoint su-7 was more innovative with it's variable wing geometry ( lenght) and a cone accomodating proper radar. When it cones to esthetics it's my least favorite of all jets.
@@sylamy7457 The Chinese copy, Shenyang F-6, actually served into the 21st century (retired PAF 2002). North Korea probably still has many examples mothballed although their F-5 (Chinese copy of MiG-17) is far less cost/labor intensive for regular training/propaganda purposes. Most abundant Russian "made" aircraft in North Korean service is MiG-23 - MiG-21 and earlier, they have mostly Chinese copies.
It amazes me that the russians can make the most advanced aircraft , spacecraft and weaponry but have never been able to make a decent family car...
Well... Recently Someone made fully working batman car, complete with the armaments in Russia
priorities
Hey,su-27 is a good family car
probably the same reason the germans cant make a reliable car
Gaz, Volga, Lada www.vortexmag.net/en/soviet-cars-6-brands-that-made-history-in-the-soviet-union/#:~:text=3.-,Lada,was%20known%20as%20a%20Zhiguli.
It makes sense to inude the altitude when talking about the speed. The mig 23 to my knowledge was not capable of reaching higher speeds than roughly mach 1.1 at sea level. But at 13000m it went up to 2300 km/h or roughly mach 2.3
Russian planes are just like russian girls.... Hot, perfect,beautiful ,elegant but extremely dangerous
You've seen enough Hollywood movies. Russian girls are affectionate and malleable and believe any bullshit you put in her ears.
@@Pussilover56 hahahahahha xD
Hee hee, you're right)
@@Pussilover56 no, never bruh
Ummm... ikr
I’ve always liked the yak fighters since playing iron aces as a kid. Man that game takes me back
MiG21 my love ♥️ I wish I was a fighter pilot..., just to fly the MiG-21
Mig 21 Bison of IAF?
Try DCS MiG-21!
@@Ioan_Iorgu DCS means?
The Dorito chip wing!
@@devendra_singh_rathore Digital Combat Sim. It’s hyper-realistic video game, real pilots play it when they’re on break and some air forces have been rumored to use it for pilot training.
The image of Mig-3 has clearly been rotated by 180 degrees since the title on the side of the aircraft is a mirror image of the word "Родина" (Motherland). I fully understand why you had to rotate some of the images though.
Good eye :-)
"За Родину", если быть точным.
I love seeing the cockpit view when they fly in formation, you can't appreciate how much work is going jnto not crashing into each other from the ground but when you see the cockpit view its a whole different story hahaha
Big respect for the 17. Dueling with our best stuff over a decade older than. Maneuvering little cannon killer with a good pilot. I think more than one reason the 21s in 'Nam hit and ran and left the 17s to fight..
Ikr, with no missiles.
3:18 what is a high subsonic plane?
It means that's the plane can't fly supersonic in level flight but in an dive it can go supersonic
A fancier way of saying "pretty much supersonic"
@@A-G-F- Not exactly ... level flight capability is pretty crucial as it takes a much greater amount of energy to simply break the sound barrier (e.g. mach 0.9 to 1.1) than it does to, say, accelerate from mach 1.3 to 1.5. In passing the sound barrier, all those sound waves build in front of the aircraft ... creating a spike in resistance to overcome (a real physical barrier of sorts). A plane that can break mach 1 in level flight can then-maintain that speed much more efficiently as it won't be pushing all of those sound waves in front.
Universal truth is " Flying objects with Propeller aren't Jet!! "
Equally true is, according to the specifically stated title of the video, jet fighters did not just appear out of thin air: they EVOLVED from earlier aircraft.
There she is!! 🙌🏾😎🙌🏾❤
hi S P...
'
who is a word - SHE -...
where is she now
MiG 17 always been my favourite.
2 questions:
On title, why do MiG-1/3 have jet flames?!
How about MiG-15bis?Also The MiG-15 shown here is Polish modyfied one, not original one
I guess it's Mig-15 Uti, a twin-seat fighter-trainer. And speaking about Bis, isn't it just a variant ? Then we would have ended up with all the variants of Mig-23, Mig-27, Mig-29 as well, and those are really really lot of. It would have been quite a burden for the author and quite a bore for the audience. And the flames... I don't see any
To roast wieners.
Thanks loved seeing that old magnificent legends
yes the mig15 uti in the thumbnail is a mig 9
😎 MiG 41 Number one 100 year!...🤩 💪💪💪
i hate when they cut out numbers from numerical order and go from 1,2,56,84,89 😂
Why are you putting MiG-15UTI instead of MiG-15 at 2:40?
Because its 🇵🇱
nice video❤❤
Ive gotten 3 ads, first was for World of Warships, second was for Reeses Chocolate, and last was War Thunder.
One is not like the others.
The laws of targeted ads tell me you are angry with a sweet tooth! lol
Отличный обзор!👍 Ждём Миг 41!
Thank you, I built these beautiful planes.
I'll take 2 please!
@@louisleedham3422 😂
How about the Mig 41 which we hear has already been produced, or is it just hearsay?
The MiG-21 might well out last most on the list in terms of remaining in active service. With modern technology becoming more compact, you do not need a 'larger' aircraft to have more power as was the trend for several design generations. Modern upgrades and rebuilds (MiG-21-2000 etc.) enable it to carry modern sensors and the latest in both Russian and western armament, making the MiG-21 a pseudo fourth gen' in terms of its capabilities (largely eliminating the incentive for current MiG-21 operators to buy entirely new aircraft to replace it).
obviously? do you think the russian airforce would use yak 9s?
@@nrdy8221 Well, I did say "current MiG-21 operators" didn't I? A lot of its current operators wouldn't have even been able to afford the MiG-21 on their own except that large numbers were written of by the Russian Air Force and left with the various Soviet Socialist Republics in which they'd been based after the dissolution of the U.S.S.R. Those operators will likely be keeping their MiG-21 flying, through upgrades, for decades whereas the aircraft types in developed nations' service with continue to evolve. So, yes, the MiG-21 will probably out last many later aircraft in terms of how long it remains in active service "somewhere" in the world. Due to sanctions preventing the delivery of new military technology to Franco's regime, Spain was still flying the Messerschmidt Bf-109 as late as 1965.
There is more
In 2019 a Indian Mig21 shot down a Pakistani f16
😎 damn this mig 21 is such a legend
AH YES MY FAVOURITE AFTERBURNER ENGINE JET THE MIG 3
Of course, because jet aircraft were developed from scratch and did not "evolve," as per the very specifically worded title of the video, from earlier aircraft.
Can the older ones not in used be turned into an unmanned disposable bomber?
It's like MiG-15UTI (double-seat combat-training version of MiG-15) with Polish Air Forces markings
Because it is Polish MiG-15UTI )) They made an error in the video!
Hans Schmotke They made LOTS of errors in this video. Should be getting A LOT more then just 10% downvotes.
Can they be used as unman decoys while using artillery?
Ah yes, Em Em is my favorite form of measurement
Great 😊
The nomenclature made sense up until Mig-31... then it jumped to Mig-35... Where did the Mig-33 go to?
My favourite is MiG 28 which appears in topgun 1 but i didn´t see it in this video
"In the previous video, we've shown you guys the evo-ilyushin..."
Hahaha dad jokes be rolling out
The brute looking MiG-25 Foxbat.
wrong why is the mig 1 and the mig 3 has jet afterburner behind them ?
For me WW2 planes and tanks were much better than today's jets, tanks etc.
Very impressive aircraft.
What about the MiG 28? I've missed that one.
What about mig-7 (i-225)??
Where is Mig-28? I saw it in the Hollywood movie.
Mig 28 nota exist this plane is fake is f-5
у русских истребителей в названиях всегда нечётные номера
(translate.google.com)
Russian fighters always have odd numbers in their names
Lol it is funny how some people take it as serious comment
@@RussianFabjan lol. True
Hollywood weren't completely stupid, however: they knew that MiG always applied odd number designations (i.e. they knew a MiG-28 would never be a misrepresentation of any real MiG aircraft).
Can these older migs be refitted and armed for unman flights and used as missiles?
So , were the propellers of mig 1 and mig 3 there just to confuse germans ?
My Favourite Aircraft is Mig 25 Foxbat and Mig 35 !!!
I LOVE YOUR VOICE. MY FAVORITE MIGS FROM OLD TIMES ARE THE MIG 21 AND THE MIG 25 GREAT PLANES AND THE MIG 25 IS STILL IN USE. EXCELLENT RUSSIAN PLANES. GREAT VIDEO. THANKS.
You kept calling the Mig-31 a Mig-25... Then there's the whole Mig-1 & 2 "Jet" reference....
yeah, she also included the Foxbat which is not in its name that is what nato called it when it first came out because they didn't know whether it was a fighter or bomber. makes me feel like a lot of the data is wrong. not a good sign.
A mig 25 looks remarkably similar to a mig 31. The main difference between the airframes on the ground are larger road wheels for the mig 25, other differences are internal in nature
@@MrStasyan2013 yeah, thats just nitpicking
The title specifically states "evolution" of the jet fighter. Not every aircraft from which the first generation jets were derived were, themselves, jet fighters.
Mig 17 didnt have afterburner , it was the shenyang f5
Yes it did..
Shut up..
The F5 is a copy of the Soviet MIG17F, which had an afterburner, that's all.
yakovlev series next?
One of my favorites
When the accountant gets to do the thumbnail...
Isn’t the mig 9 in the thumb nail a 2 seater mig15?
17 is the most beautiful machine
What's the difference between MiG 35 and MiG 29?
you should add mig 41 to the list so MiG-41 as a 5 ++ or 6th generation project
The Fulcrum is a fantastic design aerodynamically but I do love the Foxhound, seen them at Monino and MAKS, and they are magnificent machines!
why is there a picture of a mig 15 labelled as mig 9 on the thumbnail
2:41 this is SBLim 1or SBLim 2
Нам разум дал стальные руки -крылья!
MiG-1 +600km/hr speed? I checked Wikipedia and Britanica they say much less. I noticed wrong specs specially speed in many of your other videos.
So ..
Egypt won the the 1973 against israeli phantom and mirage
Using mig 17 and mig 19
Amazing
Allahumma shali wa salim wa barikh ala Sayyidina Muhammadin wa'ala ali Sayyidina Muhammadin fil awwalin wal akhirin wa fil mala'il a'la ila Yaumiddin
Brilliant video - I just wish you had included the NATO reporting names! :)
You mean cringy names?
The mig 21 looks so cool
I think the person that wrote the script didn't know what a jet engine is.
THE FREAKING TITLE IS WRONG. THEY PUT THE MIG-15 2 seater named MIG-9
Make a video on fighter jets pilots who destroyed most jets in 10 minutes.
Mig 21 is a GOAT!
PROVED IN COMBAT A TRUE LEGEND!!!!
My favourite mig 25 it was a beast sill in some countries
Same here. It would have rinsed the American F-4s and F-14s.
@@tommcglone2867 Only liability is the AA-6 missile was, like the AIM-54, a large high-yield weapon designed with massive 'bomber' targets in mind. It wasn't the kind of missile you'd expect to be able to catch a high agility fighter in the midst of conducting evasive maneuvers.
Could not fly Mach 3 without damaging its engines. By the time you got to M2.8 at 35000 feet, you were out of fuel. Could not sustain speeds above M2.4 for any amount of time without warping its flimsy aluminum skin.
Radar was so labor-intensive, a pilot was not able to properly fly the plane, simultaniously.
In other words, a big, flying shitball.
Спасибо за историю Мигов, с приветом из СССР!!!))
Ты хотел сказать- "Привет с того света"? Привет- привет, покойничек.
@@Pussilover56 Каждый понимает на столько, на сколько ему позволяет образование. Покойничек это как раз ты, потому-что ты уже похоронил свою безликую сущность 😂
@@_Baccap_ Сходи в американский Гугл на американском компьютeре и проверь на гугловский карте, в каком месте мира находится Советский Союз? Но если у тебя нет Гугла то я тебе скажу словами, Покойничек, Советский Союз находится в аду.
@@Pussilover56 Ну я же и говорю насколько интеллекта хватает, настолько и тупое мышление ...😂😂😂 -... какой-то ад в голове вообще ...
В дальнейшей никчёмной переписке не вижу никакого смысла. Американец Юрий🤣🤣🤣
The fact that they called a MIG-1 a "Jetfighter" tells you how much they fact check.....
You do understand what "evolution," as specifically stated in the title, means right?
First Modern MiG-29 , MiG-31 , MiG-35 , next it's SECRET PROJECT MiG-141 ... flaying in space and back ... pilot MileR 001 ...
You got the wrong information. Indian produce Mig 29 ground attack AC not mig27 . Also mig 21 was made in India under license.
So after the MIG-25 they started to go slower and have less range until 11 years later with the MIG-31 which was again able to reach the top speed and range.
speed isn't always as important anymore also supersonic is very stressful on the plane
The MiG-31, while not as fast as the MiG-25, did not suffer all that great a "loss" of speed considering its primary mission changed completely. It is no longer concerned primarily with the threat of non-existent mach 3-capable bombers (XB-70) but rather, with its AESA radar, radar/weapons operator, and look-down/shoot-down capability (allowing it to see terrain-skimming targets even directly below it...a blind spot to most aircrafts' sensors), is tasked with the interception of submarine-launched cruise missile attacks coming in from the vast expanses of Russia's ice-locked North.
why do you read millimeters as mm
What about the Mig 28?
Hope the video quality gets better than the thumbnail
I love the jet fighter b17 I know it’s not a MiG but still
MiG-25/maximum speed - 2171mph/3500 kph
Mig 1? Isn’t all piston migs , mig 3?