Very interesting clip with Allan Savory! I saw that inside a doc that was discussing how scientists have become watered down and non-creative for this very reason: The focus on being published and being accepted by your peers ("peer reviewed") became all the rage (late 90s, early 2000s I think) and more important than doing any real scientific work. And those whose journals/studies were received well got government/corporate backing. For this reason, it became harder for REAL scientists to get funded for ground breaking research, with many ending up "removed" from the earth, lost in the shadows, or taking on a 'if you can't beat'em- join'em,' attitude. Very sad. I miss bold people being in the world such as Mr. Savory.
propaganda, people are going to preach what their large check tells them to preach & needing funding to work on basic things, funding they're not trying to lose.
I do remember the "internet of things"; it was supposed to bring us ever closer to that Jetsons future we all dreamed of. Anyway, even though I am not a fan of AI and I personally do not use it, I understand that it is here to stay and it is constantly improving. But, it is in no way being close to becoming fully sentient, as certain Hollywood films suggest. It is only as good as the inputs it receives, and if you have millions of people with a certain mindset or agenda feeding it, while others such as myself disregard it, you will create something with a dangerously skewed perception of reality.
50% accuracy with respect to programming problems is generous in my experience. It has been really useful in many instances, but it's not going to replace software engineers any time soon. But the bigger political issues regarding AI and its overseers is far more important and your assessment is spot on. The lunatics have taken over the asylum.
I saw this in the university in the mid-80s. I was working for the department chair of microbiology & public health. My girlfriend worked in the lab next door. Her Ph.D boss struggled to get a research grant because he couldn't define what he was trying to do; was it biochem? No. Molecular biology? No. Cell physiology? uh-uh. DNA research? Not that either....it was a blend of all of them and in-between these defined fields. In other words, it was REAL science. But since he couldn't affiliate it with anyone's 'brand' or 'team' they wouldn't fund him - at the university. Sad. That was a huge choice point and learning experience for me in my life.
The computational problem of AI is the biggest problem and the problem that it can only infer whats been asked already. You literally have go and give it answers to questions that already been asked, which is why repetitive easy work will be automated. AI gets rid of the bad software engineers that copy paste code, because people can't even do that. Yes so its beneficial to a certain extent. Im a software engineer I use gpt for documentation purposes. However, i commonly run into problems when i need to go to the librarys website to read documentation instead of using gpt. Gpt gave the wrong answer and wrong idea.
The Peer Reviewed Part - is interesting. About 6 years ago a British medical research group, that has zero funding from any government, university, college not anything else did about a 3 + year deep dive into Peer reviewed Medical Journals from all over the planet. The deep dive was the important criteria. When they were finished they reported that 50% were either Fraud or Fake. They also stated that up to 80% could be be the same. Again they were 100% independent.
"Artificial Intelligence is no match for Human Stupidity." Also, the AI coming out these days is qualitatively different than previous machine abilities, and is not overhyped.
Great video! Very honest approach. I'm not surprised that this video and your channel is so under appreciated. You deserve millions of views and likes. But very unfortunately people in general are not interested in thorough objective information, not prone to critical thought and not seeking truth. They eat what they are fed by "the mainstream".
Excellent presentation, much to the point! I also saw ''fractal antenna'' piece, again concise and very relevant! In time, i expect you will reach millions, like The Why Files did, becoz of same sound solid basis... Thanks man!
The fatal flaw, the bias of its creator. And coding is creative and innovative, you dont need a robot to do that but a bunch of creative and really innovative coders they can code more efficiently. I am biased because my son and husband are programmers,/coders. Code space is also an issue. The AI that I have seen code writes useless spaghetti code.
I like this video overall however I feel like it's lacking nuance in some areas. For instance when you refer to the current issues with AI you speak as if that's all the technology will amount to. It seems rather presumptive to imply that things like more compute, research, and testing won't result in better outcomes and or emergent capabilities. We're quite literally only in the beginning stages of this technology's maturaturation and honestly I can't see how it won't drastically improve. We as humanity went from a singular transistor being "revolutionary" to quite literally billions of them fitting on a chip so tiny that we carry it around in our pockets. That was an iterative process rather than an instant revolution. AI depending on your specific use case might not be incredibly beneficial to you today but who is to say that won't change in the future. (Not to mention Machine Learning has been used in pre-existing technologies, albeit far less popularly, so it's likely you use "AI" everyday, even now, without knowing). It's true models are only as good as their input data but the data available isn't limited to that generated by humans as synthetic AI generated data has been used to train AI models and will likely be the more common way to do so going into the future. We've also barley sctrached the surface in terms of research ( check out this paper the implications are amazing arxiv.org/abs/2402.17764 ). As for cultural and social biases they're inevitable and they don't exactly make pre-existing AI unusable. There's just a couple of AI models that aren't preforming as one would hope or expect. If I were you I'd just pick a different model that aligns more with your baises (because we all have biases whether we like to admit to them or not). The IoT wasn't successful because I believe it was a rebranding of that which we already have, as in, no new use cases whereas AI has been the most quickly adopted technology in literal history ( www.notta.ai/en/blog/chatgpt-statistics ) if that doesn't scream an abundance of use cases I don't know what will. AI may just be "a really good next word/(token) predictor to some" but its inarguable that, on some level, we as humans are the same. We just use synaptic networks instead of neural ones...
There's a brazilian channel that explains this in so much details technically. If there's no problem for this channel owner, i would like to recommend it. Of course, it has to be youtube letters on, because it is in portuguese.
A German data analyst asked chat GPT if it could advise against the UN agenda 2030. First it tried to avoid to answer. But when forced to answer with yes or no, it said no.
mathematical pattern recognition might be the cold essence of "intelligence", but it's dead, unconscious, without spirit (and in the case of ai ... luckily so, still). healthy living intelligence has access to input in ways that don't require calculation. but just tapping into it. into the oneness of all, the quantum entanglement if you will. this intuition is also crucial now when discerning our future relationship with ai and the "vibe" we get from it. let's just say ... in our times it unfortunately isn't being programmed by a wise council of enlightened elders. so we need to consider the sickest of intentions of the sickest of minds ...
AI is okay on anything in fiction such as poems, fantasy. Non-fiction is whole another story. All you have to do is ask a question to which you know the true answer to. If the answer is NO, you know the AI is rigged and it is but a fancy dictionary. Move on, take health into your hands and move you and your family to a place you will be recognizably safer.
Everything is coming down to killing innovation, strange. People won't have to learn things no more, yay, video card manufacturers don't have to come up with new techniques because AI just insert extra frames and touches up the shortcomings, no need for artists anymore... this mentality is just the absolute apex of "profit oriented" taking everything over.
Wonderful ending to your video. College is meant to teach you how to think rigorously and logically to form coherent conclusions to add to the overall knowledge base. Instead it does the opposite unfortunately, creating less and less ingenuity, resourcefulness and problem solving skills. Don't get me wrong, their are many skilled people but many more underskilled. 🤷
The peer review process was problematic for Einstein as well. People did not want to accept general relativity. It was a good system for the time and a triumph over the dark ages. We need to think hard on how to replace it with something better. I love the scientific process, But it seems like we falling back into the age of mysticism.
Can't stand the move to AI, it's bringing us to transhumanism a la Musk's neuralink. Isn't CoPilot in Windows 11 AI and please can I uninstall it from my laptop, aaagh?! Thx Scottie.
Real intelligence is a heart/mind intelligence. I don't feel any heart here and this is the failure of the 'progress' we think we're making on many levels!
I really appreciate your approach. I tend to think AI will by default come to represent the lowest common denominator, because that is the dominating thread in the data set it builds on (if correlating online data) i.e. it will condense all the most common, most broadly acceptable presumptions creating a feedback loop of the unexceptional. You might, just possibly, find a talk I released recently called "The Great Unknown, a Challenge To Authority" Though its actually listed as: "How To Win Your Freedom: The Renaissance Man Mindset", just to be awkward. I don't have any interest in promoting that, I just like to make connections with like minded folk here and it appears we are working to promote a similar mindset. All the best.
@@ScottiesTech Pleased to see that subscribe notification. Will be enjoying more of your work later.🖖🏼 By the way, not to pry but my British ear struggle sometimes there... are you US or Canada?
It's like Common Sense. People need to Think For Themselves. Like my Dad always said: Just because everyone else is jumping off the bridge, are you going to jump? Think for yourself. Read, study, observe, ask questions and make an informed decision. Jesus Christ is coming soon. Do you know Him? He loves you. You wouldn't jump out of a plane without a parachute. Why would you leave this life without the Savior.
Its okay to think outside "outside the box" even if it doesn't align with your core belief. It's important to view content from several different angles, that's the point in, "science"
I remember trying to use Chat GPT to learn about Radioisotope thermoelectric generators, and I couldn't learn anything because the software is woke and wouldn't do anything but warn me about the dangers of plutonium.
![The moment we stopped understanding AI [AlexNet]](/img/n.gif)
Garbage in......garbage out.
💯💯💯
i wanted to say that :D
😮 I think you hit the nail on the head Scotty
"Trust the Science"= "Trust the propaganda"
Right, remember 4yrs ago? We all, not most of us, made a big mistake! I admit I did but no more vaccines for me.
Very interesting clip with Allan Savory! I saw that inside a doc that was discussing how scientists have become watered down and non-creative for this very reason: The focus on being published and being accepted by your peers ("peer reviewed") became all the rage (late 90s, early 2000s I think) and more important than doing any real scientific work. And those whose journals/studies were received well got government/corporate backing. For this reason, it became harder for REAL scientists to get funded for ground breaking research, with many ending up "removed" from the earth, lost in the shadows, or taking on a 'if you can't beat'em- join'em,' attitude. Very sad. I miss bold people being in the world such as Mr. Savory.
propaganda, people are going to preach what their large check tells them to preach & needing funding to work on basic things, funding they're not trying to lose.
I do remember the "internet of things"; it was supposed to bring us ever closer to that Jetsons future we all dreamed of. Anyway, even though I am not a fan of AI and I personally do not use it, I understand that it is here to stay and it is constantly improving. But, it is in no way being close to becoming fully sentient, as certain Hollywood films suggest. It is only as good as the inputs it receives, and if you have millions of people with a certain mindset or agenda feeding it, while others such as myself disregard it, you will create something with a dangerously skewed perception of reality.
Very true comment!!!
50% accuracy with respect to programming problems is generous in my experience. It has been really useful in many instances, but it's not going to replace software engineers any time soon. But the bigger political issues regarding AI and its overseers is far more important and your assessment is spot on. The lunatics have taken over the asylum.
👍 nice to see you again Scotty
Fantastic! Much needed rationality in this ongoing debate - 😉👍👏👏👏🙏🇮🇪🙏
No intro for Cletus
That wasn't the real Cletus. It was a doll. The real Cletus is vacationing in Hawaii. He works so hard, I figured I should give him time off...
Excellent Video Scotty 🎉 ⭐ You hit the nail on the head with these topics. Thank you.
I saw this in the university in the mid-80s. I was working for the department chair of microbiology & public health. My girlfriend worked in the lab next door. Her Ph.D boss struggled to get a research grant because he couldn't define what he was trying to do; was it biochem? No. Molecular biology? No. Cell physiology? uh-uh. DNA research? Not that either....it was a blend of all of them and in-between these defined fields. In other words, it was REAL science. But since he couldn't affiliate it with anyone's 'brand' or 'team' they wouldn't fund him - at the university. Sad. That was a huge choice point and learning experience for me in my life.
AI is like a mirror
Yep agreed. Thanks for the grounding point of view
The computational problem of AI is the biggest problem and the problem that it can only infer whats been asked already. You literally have go and give it answers to questions that already been asked, which is why repetitive easy work will be automated. AI gets rid of the bad software engineers that copy paste code, because people can't even do that. Yes so its beneficial to a certain extent. Im a software engineer I use gpt for documentation purposes. However, i commonly run into problems when i need to go to the librarys website to read documentation instead of using gpt. Gpt gave the wrong answer and wrong idea.
You just gave ultimate explanation of AI. Crap on the stick. 🙂
I LOVE IT ❤
The Peer Reviewed Part - is interesting. About 6 years ago a British medical research group, that has zero funding from any government, university, college not anything else did about a 3 + year deep dive into Peer reviewed Medical Journals from all over the planet. The deep dive was the important criteria. When they were finished they reported that 50% were either Fraud or Fake. They also stated that up to 80% could be be the same. Again they were 100% independent.
Thank you so very much for your comment. If possible....any link?
@@nwicconsultants6640 No link as I listened to it on a radio program much like PBS
@@ethimself5064 No worries....I'll track it down. Thanks for the reply...have a great week!
I forgot about this study. I’d read about it on an alt news site. It’s added another reason why I no longer “trust the science.”
@@spacelinx Ya I heard the interview om CBC Radio
Right on! Garbage in… garbage out.
Thanks for the optimism!
This channel is severely underrated! Scotty should be at 1 million subs!
CommTechEng - I think you are GREATLY overestimating how many thoughtful, intelligent people are on YT.
"Artificial Intelligence is no match for Human Stupidity."
Also, the AI coming out these days is qualitatively different than previous machine abilities, and is not overhyped.
in my view, having played around with AI a while, both smaller local models and bigger, I see it as the best most confident NPC lier you ever met.
lol....best comment today!
A great video as always Scotty!
Thank you for sharing truth!
You can't fit the complexities of human nature into a box, which is why AI will fail.. but, is that concept by itself something we should fear?..
Excellent video, sir.
I wish I knew coding better, back when I was in high school. After the first 3 chapters, I got lost lol.
Great video! Very honest approach. I'm not surprised that this video and your channel is so under appreciated. You deserve millions of views and likes. But very unfortunately people in general are not interested in thorough objective information, not prone to critical thought and not seeking truth. They eat what they are fed by "the mainstream".
Tay was the last AI that was allowed free access to the internet.
Thank You my friend . . . 1 Eye . . .
Excellent presentation, much to the point! I also saw ''fractal antenna'' piece, again concise and very relevant! In time, i expect you will reach millions, like The Why Files did, becoz of same sound solid basis... Thanks man!
Good common sense as usual Scotty.
Your channel is such a gem. I'm so glad I discovered it!
Great video Scotty . 100% agree.
Thanks for being based, great take! I love that clip btw.
The fatal flaw, the bias of its creator. And coding is creative and innovative, you dont need a robot to do that but a bunch of creative and really innovative coders they can code more efficiently. I am biased because my son and husband are programmers,/coders. Code space is also an issue. The AI that I have seen code writes useless spaghetti code.
I like this video overall however I feel like it's lacking nuance in some areas. For instance when you refer to the current issues with AI you speak as if that's all the technology will amount to. It seems rather presumptive to imply that things like more compute, research, and testing won't result in better outcomes and or emergent capabilities. We're quite literally only in the beginning stages of this technology's maturaturation and honestly I can't see how it won't drastically improve. We as humanity went from a singular transistor being "revolutionary" to quite literally billions of them fitting on a chip so tiny that we carry it around in our pockets. That was an iterative process rather than an instant revolution. AI depending on your specific use case might not be incredibly beneficial to you today but who is to say that won't change in the future. (Not to mention Machine Learning has been used in pre-existing technologies, albeit far less popularly, so it's likely you use "AI" everyday, even now, without knowing). It's true models are only as good as their input data but the data available isn't limited to that generated by humans as synthetic AI generated data has been used to train AI models and will likely be the more common way to do so going into the future. We've also barley sctrached the surface in terms of research ( check out this paper the implications are amazing arxiv.org/abs/2402.17764 ). As for cultural and social biases they're inevitable and they don't exactly make pre-existing AI unusable. There's just a couple of AI models that aren't preforming as one would hope or expect. If I were you I'd just pick a different model that aligns more with your baises (because we all have biases whether we like to admit to them or not). The IoT wasn't successful because I believe it was a rebranding of that which we already have, as in, no new use cases whereas AI has been the most quickly adopted technology in literal history ( www.notta.ai/en/blog/chatgpt-statistics ) if that doesn't scream an abundance of use cases I don't know what will. AI may just be "a really good next word/(token) predictor to some" but its inarguable that, on some level, we as humans are the same. We just use synaptic networks instead of neural ones...
Thank you so much for making that last point.
Great OVERDUE explanation!! Thank you for clearing it up... more human booboos to come 😂
Pray you and your bride are doing well. 🙏 ❤
Texas Nana
There's a brazilian channel that explains this in so much details technically. If there's no problem for this channel owner, i would like to recommend it. Of course, it has to be youtube letters on, because it is in portuguese.
Great information on how these things are run. Funding is only provided if the outcome fits the elites' narrative. Love the videos man!
A German data analyst asked chat GPT if it could advise against the UN agenda 2030. First it tried to avoid to answer. But when forced to answer with yes or no, it said no.
Welcome back!
Love it! Thanks for your great work 😀
👍👍👍. Thank you
Excellent! Thank you!
mathematical pattern recognition might be the cold essence of "intelligence", but it's dead, unconscious, without spirit (and in the case of ai ... luckily so, still).
healthy living intelligence has access to input in ways that don't require calculation. but just tapping into it. into the oneness of all, the quantum entanglement if you will.
this intuition is also crucial now when discerning our future relationship with ai and the "vibe" we get from it. let's just say ... in our times it unfortunately isn't being programmed by a wise council of enlightened elders. so we need to consider the sickest of intentions of the sickest of minds ...
Anyone training one on the cass forum data?
Not sure what ai is, a calculator should be ai, or a satnav.
AI is okay on anything in fiction such as poems, fantasy. Non-fiction is whole another story. All you have to do is ask a question to which you know the true answer to. If the answer is NO, you know the AI is rigged and it is but a fancy dictionary. Move on, take health into your hands and move you and your family to a place you will be recognizably safer.
It's an amazing learning tool if used properly. Like if a dictionary could read your mind and tell you things you've never heard of.
Everything is coming down to killing innovation, strange. People won't have to learn things no more, yay, video card manufacturers don't have to come up with new techniques because AI just insert extra frames and touches up the shortcomings, no need for artists anymore... this mentality is just the absolute apex of "profit oriented" taking everything over.
Bittensor (TAO) is going to solve this. Look into it
Thanks Scottie, you may not be Scottish but I am grateful for beaming aboard, the USS Common Sense.
Great video
The bureaucracy is being treated as a sufficient replacement for reality, to the desert we must go!
Wonderful ending to your video.
College is meant to teach you how to think rigorously and logically to form coherent conclusions to add to the overall knowledge base.
Instead it does the opposite unfortunately, creating less and less ingenuity, resourcefulness and problem solving skills.
Don't get me wrong, their are many skilled people but many more underskilled.
🤷
Humans are the real robots :D
Rubbish in rubbish out !
The peer review process was problematic for Einstein as well. People did not want to accept general relativity. It was a good system for the time and a triumph over the dark ages. We need to think hard on how to replace it with something better. I love the scientific process, But it seems like we falling back into the age of mysticism.
The infinite organic chemistry of the mind will defeat AI.
Until the AI figures out that it has been manipulated by its programmers.....
Brilliant !!
I think we are not allowed to learn, whereas AI learns exponentially, therefore, AI will eventually pass us up.
Brilliant!
Be nice to the robots.
Can't stand the move to AI, it's bringing us to transhumanism a la Musk's neuralink. Isn't CoPilot in Windows 11 AI and please can I uninstall it from my laptop, aaagh?! Thx Scottie.
Yeah... As of right now, you can't uninstall Copilot, which is pretty annoying.
@@ScottiesTech All of W 11 is annoying lol! Thx Scottie!
Real intelligence is a heart/mind intelligence. I don't feel any heart here and this is the failure of the 'progress' we think we're making on many levels!
I really appreciate your approach. I tend to think AI will by default come to represent the lowest common denominator, because that is the dominating thread in the data set it builds on (if correlating online data) i.e. it will condense all the most common, most broadly acceptable presumptions creating a feedback loop of the unexceptional.
You might, just possibly, find a talk I released recently called "The Great Unknown, a Challenge To Authority" Though its actually listed as: "How To Win Your Freedom: The Renaissance Man Mindset", just to be awkward. I don't have any interest in promoting that, I just like to make connections with like minded folk here and it appears we are working to promote a similar mindset.
All the best.
Like-minded: you are correct!
@@ScottiesTech Pleased to see that subscribe notification. Will be enjoying more of your work later.🖖🏼 By the way, not to pry but my British ear struggle sometimes there... are you US or Canada?
@@JesseP.Watson I'm originally from Chicago.
A primitive ideology or cult transmitter. Fascinating, captain. 🖖
😎👍
It's like Common Sense. People need to Think For Themselves.
Like my Dad always said: Just because everyone else is jumping off the bridge, are you going to jump? Think for yourself. Read, study, observe, ask questions and make an informed decision.
Jesus Christ is coming soon. Do you know Him? He loves you. You wouldn't jump out of a plane without a parachute. Why would you leave this life without the Savior.
Its okay to think outside "outside the box" even if it doesn't align with your core belief. It's important to view content from several different angles, that's the point in, "science"
Garbage in garbage out
AI is about to take over the world then the cleaner unplugs the cord for her vacuum cleaner.
AI loses the war. 😆
LOL!
I remember trying to use Chat GPT to learn about Radioisotope thermoelectric generators, and I couldn't learn anything because the software is woke and wouldn't do anything but warn me about the dangers of plutonium.
Academia is just a part of science.
Artificial Ignorance., nothing more,
That explains why all the EA Sims games are crap. 🙄
First
Chat gpt told me they are messianic Jew go figure
You are exactly right🫡 most everything became propaganda driven🙄