We need to send subs down into the waters between the islands. I remember a few years back when a local sailor scanned the ocean floor off the the Azores and discovered what appeared to be a pyramid. The secrets are all there to be discovered.
Yup i have that same video on my drive right now, it was an interview by RTP but weirdly enough no one has ever spoken about it… I plan to use it on my next video
I remember when I found Cody'sLab channel, he had 2k subs like you have now mate. Now he has over 2M. Hope your channel will be also so much successful.
@@Culturiosity I will send this video to my friends so they can see it, I currently can't help you directly financially but getting a few more subs and comments can help a little
Look @ the eye of the Sahara Desert. Then look @ everything around it. Look at all the water scaring after the water retreated. Think about a Tsunami. It's not under water anymore. But everything has been washed away. The time when shorelines were elsewhere. It right in front of you, and over looked. Good luck!
The cave with the little cubbies is a dove cot. There are many examples of this type of dove cot around the world. It's obviously a dove cot, and the fact that archeologists are trying to pretend it's a columbarium seems disingenuous to me, or perhaps they really haven't studied at all. People used to eat squabs (baby pigeons) and of course carrier pigeons could be used to send messages over long distances very fast. I'm not suggesting Neolithic people were training carrier pigeons, but they must have been eating them, because that's a dove cot in the Azores, and it looks like it's probably Neolithic.
I am more interested in the theory represented by Jimmie on the Bright Insight. Richat structure is the most ideal location of Atlantis, geographically both through history and by scale. Azores, Malta, and Bimini, all seem very minuscule by comparison.
@@JoshuaRolen I meant the scale of the structures found there, not the landmass. On the other hand, Richat structure do not boast any, since it mus've been 'destroyed'. Fragments of acrtifects are scattered their though, as per the documentry featured in the first video about this by Bright Insight.
@@JoshuaRolen you need to watch the recommended video to see what Jimmy has to explain in that, from every perspective! th-cam.com/video/r9Gj_6dmNcM/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/wbUujL6ypKg/w-d-xo.html It's not hearsay...
@@SMakhdoom Maybe there are larger structures in the Azores that are burried beneath the sea floor. I would say the scale of tracks carved in stone that are found in the Azores, that can also be found in malta, is quite significant. Regardless of what remaining structers there are, the distance between the similar tracks shows the possibility of prominence within the mediteranian.
His-tory- what if atlantis is the same as the garden of eden which is the district earth? What if the story of civilisations who had their name changed by each civilisation from beings called the annu-naki, sumerians, greeks, egyptians, romans? what if they are all the same civilisations. You name a country and then along comes an invader who changes it's name to that civilisation ruler? Similar to where a street, a district, a monument, a suburb etc has an english name but is changed because it represents colonisation and so changed to the original according to that generation? What if the annu-naki are the same rulers but in our generation they have disguised their identity under another name? What if the belief of their time has changed name and characteristics but is the same belief of their time but different in our generation? What if the story of the mark of the beast is his-tory of an invader many years ago after a great war and the ruler implemented a mark on the citizens of their time and that ruler and mark is still alive today in our generation under a different name. What if the invaders who brought their belief into the land we call china and have held the country in their grips of dictatorship for many years and the ccp is a part of that belief left by the injvaders and that generation carried it over to this day? The govern-mankind or government is a private corporation who is ruling on our land/country/nation/corporation and has taken over like a corporate take-over? What if we have already been invaded and what THEY said, " when THEY reveal themselves, it will be too late". This is not our govern-ment but a foreign corporation ruling over the citizens on foreign land- this island. What if the annu-naki are the same rulers but in our generation they have disguised their identity under another name? the beast/corporation? What if atlantis is the same as the garden of eden which is the district called earth?
First: who coined the word of Atlantis? What was the original name? Was it a metropolis or a garden? Was it a civilisation? What was the language that was spoken before they edited and translated it into english? I spoke about this before and there is an interesting passage in the diary of his-tory where the waters covered the surface and the waters subsided and went through the crust by an opening...In the Bible, it doesn't take long for water to be mentioned. Right away in Genesis 1:2, "The earth was a formless void and darkness covered the face of the deep, while a wind from God swept over the face of the waters." Genesis 7:24 And the waters prevailed upon the earth for 150 days. The waters receded steadily from the earth, and after 150 days the waters had gone down. Genesis 8:1 But God remembered Noah and all the animals and livestock that were with him in the ark. And God sent a wind over the earth, and the waters began to subside. Before any building of such, waters had to subside to bring forth dry land. There is a problem here, in Genesis chapter 1:27 we have a plan being created by these gods to create beings in their image and likeness-- give them dominion over all the creatures--"God saw all that He had made, and behold, it was very good. And there was evening and there was morning, the sixth day". but along comes chapter 2: lord god forms not creates as in chapter 1:27, and places the man in a garden---but here is where there is a discrepancy: Genesis 2: 5 Now no shrub of the field was yet in the earth, and no plant of the field had yet sprouted, for the LORD God had not sent rain upon the earth, and there was no man to cultivate the ground. 6: But a mist used to rise from the earth and water the whole surface of the ground. 7: Then the LORD God formed man of dust from the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being. 8: The LORD God planted a garden toward the east, in Eden; and there He placed the man whom He had formed. Chapter 1 says he created all things even man and female and animals but in chapter 2, "Now no shrub of the field was yet in the earth, and no plant of the field had yet sprouted, for the LORD God had not sent rain upon the earth, and there was no man" How come? So was there a civilisation before or after the waters upon the earth? Why we have God and then lord god? Chapter 1: " Let Us" is a planning for creation and chapter 2 is to form man. "Now no shrub of the field was yet in the earth, and no plant of the field had yet sprouted, for the LORD God had not sent rain upon the earth, and there was no man " So was there was a plan chapter 1: “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the cattle and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” 27: God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them". So before anyone starts calling out about a fable of a civilisation or place called Atlantis, these questions have to be answered.
It was a protogreek civilization and they spoke Greek, we know that because the Egyptian priests who told solon about atlantis also told him that atlanteans worshipped the god Poseidon and thought of him as their king
@@prime4939 Who were the Greeks? Before or after or whilst Atlantis? Once again, ‘ who told Plato? Who were the Egyptians? before or after or during the his-Tory of Atlantis? Who or what is the real name of this fabled civilisation? Is it the story of before the garden in eden?
Meteor crashes into an ice sheet on top of Michigan debris creates the Carolina bays. Tidal wave wipes out Atlantis in the azores and ends up hitting Africa creating the richat structure and a biblical flood in the Mediterranean. Noah builds an ark lol.
@@Culturiosity no problem are u ready, to know it ? 1: vibrations of atoms 2: light sound earth water rock all vibrations . a rainbow is way... WAY more then just colors. 3: humans are a creation and evolution at the same time . 4 : everything, has end and begin is human invention. 5: humans in atlantis had to be destroyed . 6: humans will be once again reset. 7: god is everything.
It is so hilarious how people take an obvious fictional story used as an allegory as fact by cherry picking a few aspects from it. Funny how they never have include the part where Athenes is able to destroy Atlantis (yes, Athenians first destroyed Atlantis before it sunk to the sea) 6,000 years before Athenes existed. You would think that would be step one in the journey because we know where Athenes is. Funny how they don’t dig there to find the 9,000 year old version of the city that was so advanced that they were able to destroy the super advanced Atlantis civilization.
@@Culturiosity No I’m saying if Athens existed 9,000 years ago then we should look there first because as far as we know the first city that later became Athens only started to appear 5,000 years later than the story of Atlantis
According to ancient Egyptian temple records the Athenians fought an aggressive war against the rulers of Atlantis some nine thousand years ago and won, but the records also state that Atlantis was in the middle of the Atlantic ocean and not near Athens or greece it was the atlanteans who went and attacked the Athenians, and not the Athenians that attacked them.
@Culturiosity por que Eu acho que realmente podia ser evidencia por civilizacões antigas funda do mar. Sou Amerciano cuioso e creo que seria posivil abrir os olhos de todo mundo se achavamos algo claramente obras humanos - como um pyramid. Ja descubrimos coisas misteriosas como Rua Bimini, e obras de pedras gigantes abaixo as aquas por perto de Japao. Mas pouco ja está explorido por que estes ideas estão taboo pra comunidade scienticifo. Deixe a evidencia fala por se mesmo.
You need to re-read Plato's description. Apart from the circular shape and rings the Richat structure fails most requirements including location, it's almost 600 km from the coast, and sinking into the sea, it's approx 450 m above sea level. Another point to consider is in the time that Atlantis was meant to have existed the Sahara desert and much of Northern Africa was green with lakes, inland seas and many river systems. If the Richat structure was Atlantis then trade and access would have been possible and easier via the river systems etc and not through the (then) perilous journey of sailing through the pillars of hercules into the unknown.
Help me find Atlantis by becoming a channel member ;) or buying some merch: lusitanoofficialstore.myspreadshop.co.uk/
The underground of Azores is where it's at
We need to send subs down into the waters between the islands. I remember a few years back when a local sailor scanned the ocean floor off the the Azores and discovered what appeared to be a pyramid. The secrets are all there to be discovered.
Yup i have that same video on my drive right now, it was an interview by RTP but weirdly enough no one has ever spoken about it… I plan to use it on my next video
Randall carlson goes in more detail in other videos, make sure to check them out 👍
I remember when I found Cody'sLab channel, he had 2k subs like you have now mate. Now he has over 2M. Hope your channel will be also so much successful.
Thank so much! I wish you all the best too 👊🏻
This seems actually fascinating, I hope you can actually discover Atlantis and have millions of subs in the future!
Thank you so much @octopus 👊🏻
@@Culturiosity I will send this video to my friends so they can see it, I currently can't help you directly financially but getting a few more subs and comments can help a little
Look @ the eye of the Sahara Desert. Then look @ everything around it. Look at all the water scaring after the water retreated. Think about a Tsunami. It's not under water anymore. But everything has been washed away. The time when shorelines were elsewhere. It right in front of you, and over looked. Good luck!
Exactly, 12,000 years ago there could very well be a lake in the sahara like some theories I’ve read
The cave with the little cubbies is a dove cot. There are many examples of this type of dove cot around the world. It's obviously a dove cot, and the fact that archeologists are trying to pretend it's a columbarium seems disingenuous to me, or perhaps they really haven't studied at all. People used to eat squabs (baby pigeons) and of course carrier pigeons could be used to send messages over long distances very fast. I'm not suggesting Neolithic people were training carrier pigeons, but they must have been eating them, because that's a dove cot in the Azores, and it looks like it's probably Neolithic.
They claim it was there before the portuguese though, and the azores are too far away for pigeons to send messages don’t you think?
I live on Faial Island - you're welcome to pop in when you visit our island.
Thank you very much irmão!
I am more interested in the theory represented by Jimmie on the Bright Insight. Richat structure is the most ideal location of Atlantis, geographically both through history and by scale. Azores, Malta, and Bimini, all seem very minuscule by comparison.
They where much larger before they sunk. Thats the point.
@@JoshuaRolen I meant the scale of the structures found there, not the landmass. On the other hand, Richat structure do not boast any, since it mus've been 'destroyed'. Fragments of acrtifects are scattered their though, as per the documentry featured in the first video about this by Bright Insight.
@@SMakhdoom The Richat structure is quite far away from the ocean for the capital of a maritime based civilization.
@@JoshuaRolen you need to watch the recommended video to see what Jimmy has to explain in that, from every perspective!
th-cam.com/video/r9Gj_6dmNcM/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/wbUujL6ypKg/w-d-xo.html
It's not hearsay...
@@SMakhdoom Maybe there are larger structures in the Azores that are burried beneath the sea floor. I would say the scale of tracks carved in stone that are found in the Azores, that can also be found in malta, is quite significant. Regardless of what remaining structers there are, the distance between the similar tracks shows the possibility of prominence within the mediteranian.
His-tory- what if atlantis is the same as the garden of eden which is the district earth? What if the story of civilisations who had their name changed by each civilisation from beings called the annu-naki, sumerians, greeks, egyptians, romans? what if they are all the same civilisations. You name a country and then along comes an invader who changes it's name to that civilisation ruler? Similar to where a street, a district, a monument, a suburb etc has an english name but is changed because it represents colonisation and so changed to the original according to that generation?
What if the annu-naki are the same rulers but in our generation they have disguised their identity under another name? What if the belief of their time has changed name and characteristics but is the same belief of their time but different in our generation? What if the story of the mark of the beast is his-tory of an invader many years ago after a great war and the ruler implemented a mark on the citizens of their time and that ruler and mark is still alive today in our generation under a different name.
What if the invaders who brought their belief into the land we call china and have held the country in their grips of dictatorship for many years and the ccp is a part of that belief left by the injvaders and that generation carried it over to this day?
The govern-mankind or government is a private corporation who is ruling on our land/country/nation/corporation and has taken over like a corporate take-over?
What if we have already been invaded and what THEY said, " when THEY reveal themselves, it will be too late".
This is not our govern-ment but a foreign corporation ruling over the citizens on foreign land- this island.
What if the annu-naki are the same rulers but in our generation they have disguised their identity under another name? the beast/corporation?
What if atlantis is the same as the garden of eden which is the district called earth?
First: who coined the word of Atlantis? What was the original name? Was it a metropolis or a garden? Was it a civilisation? What was the language that was spoken before they edited and translated it into english?
I spoke about this before and there is an interesting passage in the diary of his-tory where the waters covered the surface and the waters subsided and went through the crust by an opening...In the Bible, it doesn't take long for water to be mentioned. Right away in Genesis 1:2, "The earth was a formless void and darkness covered the face of the deep, while a wind from God swept over the face of the waters."
Genesis 7:24 And the waters prevailed upon the earth for 150 days.
The waters receded steadily from the earth, and after 150 days the waters had gone down. Genesis 8:1 But God remembered Noah and all the animals and livestock that were with him in the ark. And God sent a wind over the earth, and the waters began to subside.
Before any building of such, waters had to subside to bring forth dry land. There is a problem here, in Genesis chapter 1:27 we have a plan being created by these gods to create beings in their image and likeness-- give them dominion over all the creatures--"God saw all that He had made, and behold, it was very good. And there was evening and there was morning, the sixth day".
but along comes chapter 2: lord god forms not creates as in chapter 1:27, and places the man in a garden---but here is where there is a discrepancy:
Genesis 2: 5 Now no shrub of the field was yet in the earth, and no plant of the field had yet sprouted, for the LORD God had not sent rain upon the earth, and there was no man to cultivate the ground. 6: But a mist used to rise from the earth and water the whole surface of the ground. 7: Then the LORD God formed man of dust from the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being. 8: The LORD God planted a garden toward the east, in Eden; and there He placed the man whom He had formed.
Chapter 1 says he created all things even man and female and animals but in chapter 2, "Now no shrub of the field was yet in the earth, and no plant of the field had yet sprouted, for the LORD God had not sent rain upon the earth, and there was no man"
How come?
So was there a civilisation before or after the waters upon the earth? Why we have God and then lord god? Chapter 1: " Let Us" is a planning for creation and chapter 2 is to form man. "Now no shrub of the field was yet in the earth, and no plant of the field had yet sprouted, for the LORD God had not sent rain upon the earth, and there was no man "
So was there was a plan chapter 1: “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the cattle and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” 27: God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them".
So before anyone starts calling out about a fable of a civilisation or place called Atlantis, these questions have to be answered.
It was a protogreek civilization and they spoke Greek, we know that because the Egyptian priests who told solon about atlantis also told him that atlanteans worshipped the god Poseidon and thought of him as their king
@@prime4939 Who were the Greeks? Before or after or whilst Atlantis?
Once again, ‘ who told Plato? Who were the Egyptians? before or after or during the his-Tory of Atlantis? Who or what is the real name of this fabled civilisation? Is it the story of before the garden in eden?
Bible is a jewish amalgam of pre-existing geomythology. Nothing groundbreaking, just jews doing what they do best, usury.
Meteor crashes into an ice sheet on top of Michigan debris creates the Carolina bays. Tidal wave wipes out Atlantis in the azores and ends up hitting Africa creating the richat structure and a biblical flood in the Mediterranean. Noah builds an ark lol.
Jimmy is sharp! He reminds me of what told me When I was a boy. He told me.
Its amazing how he keeps finding new evidence almost every month
The Richat structure.
That’s currently in my top 3 possibilities
i have the exact center of atlantis...
Share your secrets 😉
@@Culturiosity no problem
are u ready, to know it ?
1: vibrations of atoms
2: light sound earth water rock all vibrations .
a rainbow is way... WAY more then just colors.
3: humans are a creation and evolution at the same time .
4 : everything, has end and begin is human invention.
5: humans in atlantis had to be destroyed .
6: humans will be once again reset.
7: god is everything.
It is so hilarious how people take an obvious fictional story used as an allegory as fact by cherry picking a few aspects from it.
Funny how they never have include the part where Athenes is able to destroy Atlantis (yes, Athenians first destroyed Atlantis before it sunk to the sea) 6,000 years before Athenes existed.
You would think that would be step one in the journey because we know where Athenes is. Funny how they don’t dig there to find the 9,000 year old version of the city that was so advanced that they were able to destroy the super advanced Atlantis civilization.
You’re saying Atlantis is underneath Athens?
@@Culturiosity No I’m saying if Athens existed 9,000 years ago then we should look there first because as far as we know the first city that later became Athens only started to appear 5,000 years later than the story of Atlantis
According to ancient Egyptian temple records the Athenians fought an aggressive war against the rulers of Atlantis some nine thousand years ago and won, but the records also state that Atlantis was in the middle of the Atlantic ocean and not near Athens or greece it was the atlanteans who went and attacked the Athenians, and not the Athenians that attacked them.
They destroyed the atlanteans who attacked them and not Atlantis itself
@@prime4939 So Plato was wrong?
There are ancient texts which speak of Atlantis being the entire world in the past. The ring cities were just capitals.
A worldwide culture? Wow
I think you're on to something. Can i join you?
Yes of course, you are more than welcome
@@Culturiosity Eu falo, tambem, cara!
@@bjjolley como é que achas que me consegues ajudar irmao do Brazil? :)
@Culturiosity por que Eu acho que realmente podia ser evidencia por civilizacões antigas funda do mar. Sou Amerciano cuioso e creo que seria posivil abrir os olhos de todo mundo se achavamos algo claramente obras humanos - como um pyramid.
Ja descubrimos coisas misteriosas como Rua Bimini, e obras de pedras gigantes abaixo as aquas por perto de Japao. Mas pouco ja está explorido por que estes ideas estão taboo pra comunidade scienticifo.
Deixe a evidencia fala por se mesmo.
th-cam.com/video/Q9C0VabifwY/w-d-xo.html Nossa.
You will find evidence of the same civilization, not Atlantis itself
Same as who?
West of Borneo, youre welcome
Surely it’s too far away
@@Culturiosity check out what that area looked like in the ice age
Ancient Atlantis is the Richat Structure in what is now Mauritania. Case closed.
We’ll see 😉
A myth is a story or legend based on facts. There may have been a central Allanton city but the antlantis civilisation was a world wide culture.
That is harder to prove but could very well be true
Ha! Jimmy joke.
Joe
it's the eye of the Sahara en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richat_Structure it's bang on to platos description.
You need to re-read Plato's description. Apart from the circular shape and rings the Richat structure fails most requirements including location, it's almost 600 km from the coast, and sinking into the sea, it's approx 450 m above sea level. Another point to consider is in the time that Atlantis was meant to have existed the Sahara desert and much of Northern Africa was green with lakes, inland seas and many river systems. If the Richat structure was Atlantis then trade and access would have been possible and easier via the river systems etc and not through the (then) perilous journey of sailing through the pillars of hercules into the unknown.
@damo might be right here
@joerogan
@powerfulJRE
Cheers for that! I wish I could speak with any of these gentlemen