Stephanie Meeks: The Past and Future City

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 9

  • @marcelmoulin3335
    @marcelmoulin3335 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Preservation makes perfect sense. Those charming, lovely, special architectural gems provide our communities with an identity--soul. We delight in cities like Brugge that teem with unforgettable ambiance and warmth. Gigantic, monolithic modern architecture too often is soulless, cold, and stark. Such architectural feats may impress from the air; however, at ground level, they do very little or nothing to create a happy, meaningful environment for the pedestrian. We can do better. We must do better. Keep up the invaluable work, CNU. (Perhaps you can encourage the Dutch to stop with their massive urban sprawl projects. Since 1970, they have seemingly replicated the very worst aspects of American cities. A colossal pity!)

  • @ivanoffw
    @ivanoffw 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The one out of five who believe that their city is quaint and needs more modern buildings are from the architecture profession.

  • @tomb4575
    @tomb4575 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes old buildings can be reused but will a high tech company spend amounts of money to rewire a building. I am always reminded of the house painter on the old Murphy Brown show when architect's think they have an unlimited budget.

  • @jiainsf
    @jiainsf 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    the old designs are difficult to recreate from a mass production economy: Architects used to be artisans, now they are economists

    • @LoveDayandAge
      @LoveDayandAge 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm studying architecture and I totally agree.

  • @AstroMagi
    @AstroMagi 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not to take away from her point but the city at 19:58 is Chicago not LA.

  • @keltiboissonneault4263
    @keltiboissonneault4263 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bumping for the algorithm

  • @quackersgaming7936
    @quackersgaming7936 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Unbelievable historical

  • @derekmarkovic
    @derekmarkovic 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'd totally get with her.